Barack’s vision of a Changed America?

"Whatever we once were, we're no longer a Christian nation. At least not just. We are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, and a Buddhist nation, and a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers,"—Sen. Barack Obama

Here’s a phrase that Senator Barack Obama is obviously unfamiliar with, “E Pluribus Unum.” Someone really should explain the term to presumptive Democrat nominee for president and Illinois Senator Barack Obama.

It means, “Out of the many one.” What it doesn’t mean is a balkanized nation of multiculturalism and multi-theism maybe someone should explain that to Sen. Obama.

Oh that’s right, silly me American’s want change, so I guess such an out dated concept as coming out of many backgrounds and cultures to become one America is no longer the goal for this country, no that was an invention of dead old white men an invention that is no longer relevant for a progressive America right?

According to Sen. Obama America is no longer operating under the tenet of E Pluribus Unum, America has changed, America wants change. So much so that if that change required America from ceasing from being America well that’s all good too!

According to Sen. Obama America has became a religious and cultural balkanized nation in the similitude of the nations of the east Nations that people have and are fleeing from by the hundreds of thousands to come to a nation that they were told believes in E Pluribus Unum and freedom. (see story)

Where else in the world (except a dieing Europe) could a presidential hopeful boast that the traditions that have made their nation what it is are no longer needed?

Think about it. Most nations’ traditions are so oppressive that people flee from those places to come here to America. Yet we don’t see anyone in the world so willing as Sen. Obama to give up on the traditions that they are fleeing from, even if those traditions have bankrupted their nation.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would never stand up to declare that Iran is no longer a Muslim nation. No Saudi Arabian royal would claim that Saudi Arabia is not longer a Muslim nation; No Egyptian president would ever say that Egypt is no longer a Muslim nation; Hu Jintao the Chinese president would never assert that China is no longer a Communistic Atheistic nation. Ironically these nations are looking for change too, only the change they seek is to impose their tyrannical wills on other nations, like America for instance.

Yet in America, the shining beacon on the hill, a once great nation because people like the old dead white men, I previous referred to, believed in traditions that made this nation uniquely a great nation. Yet we have fallen so low as to have a man running for president who obviously doesn’t understand what tyrannical and oppressor nations know?

What they know is that for any nation, free or dictatorial, to keep operating they must keep and stay true their original traditions their systems of government must be upheld not undermined if they are going to continue to exist.

Someone should tell Sen. Obama that America has always been a nation that has accommodated others of different faiths and backgrounds, because we are a Christian nation not in spite of that fact. America has not always been perfect in this but nothing’s perfect.

We can and must always be traditionally America the home of the free and the land of the brave. That distinction must be maintained no matter who comes here, no matter their beliefs or their faith because the American tradition was made possible because we are who we are, a Christian nation.

Sen. Obama you show me another nation, Muslim, Hindu, or an atheist nation, that is like America; free, welcoming of other faiths and beliefs and I will gladly agree with you that America needs to change from being a Christian nation to just being one of the many multicultural and multi-theistic nations of the world!

You have only to look to Europe and see that when a country forgets its own traditions and allows other traditions and religions to set up as equal residents the other religions are generally not as tolerate as the faith and traditions that welcomed them.

Contrary to your belief Sen. Obama, America is not a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation or a nation of nonbelievers.

Yes people who practice those beliefs came to America and are apart of the American dream of freedom and they are free to practice their beliefs however they see fit.

That notwithstanding, one only has to read the documents that began this nation, the Mayfair compact for instance, Sen. Obama you should read it and others like it and you will discover that the ideas that made this nation what it is today come from a unique root and if that root is ever severed that would be the death of the freedoms that we all enjoy today.

Is that the change that you offer Sen. Obama? Do you offer the change that is the death knell that has multicultural Europe in its last throes?

To wit a look to Europe is evidence enough that multiculturalism and multi-theism does not work and if we are as Sen. Obama says no longer a Christian nation then the root has indeed been severed and we are no longer America!

More Homosexual Oppression by Fascist Homosexuals

Fred Karger, homosexual organizer and oppressor of non-homosexuals

When is the last time you heard of a minority group attempting to deny someone of their rightful constitutional rights?

Legitimate minority groups have always fought for their own rights but never have I heard of a minority group fighting to deny a citizen or citizens from exercising his, her or their constitution guaranteed rights to legitimately participant in this society the way that they see fit.

That is what freedom is all about right, being able to do, say, believe, support or oppose whatever one chooses to.

Not so to Homosexual Oppressors who just recently used the California state Supreme Court to deny millions of California voters their right to a constitutional valid and legitimate voted on proposition 22 that defined marriage as it had always been since the genesis of man and womankind.

Now homosexual oppressors are targeting Doug Manchester who contributed $125,000 to Proposition 8, a proposition that is attempting to reestablish the people’s 2000 vote on proposition 22 which only became necessary because of the corporate funded Supreme Court homosexual attack against California's voters in the first place! (see story)

This fascist attack against Manchester is meant to intimate citizens who disagree with the unconstitutional California Supreme Court judicial fiat from exercising their constitution rights to dissent against the powerful government/special interest group partnership of corporate/government homosexual oppressors.

Millions of California put up the firewall of proposition 22 in 2000, 61 percent of California voters approved the proposition, which defined marriage as it had always been between one man and one woman, ahead of the advancing corporate funded homosexual Orwellian court sanctioned court invention of homosexual marriage.

This well funded corporate homosexual movement is backed by corporations and investors that you know and trust. Corporations that have undermined and devalued marriage in this country, the following corporations are: (list credited to Worldnetdaily)
• Aetna
• Agilent Technologies
• Alston & Bird
• American Airlines
• American Express
• Apple Computer
• AT&T
• Avaya
• Bausch & Lomb
• Best Buy
• Borders Group
• BP America
• California State Automobile Association
• Capital One Financial
• Cargill
• Charles Schwab
• Chevron
• ChoicePoint
• Chubb
• Cisco Systems
• Citigroup
• CMP Media
• Corning
• Credit Suisse First Boston
• Cummins
• Daimler Chrysler
• Dell
• Deutsche Bank
• Dominion Resources
• Dow Chemical
• Eastman Kodak
• Ernst & Young
• Estee Lauder Companies
• Faegre & Benson
• Ford Motor Co.
• Freescale Semiconductor
• Gap Inc.
• General Mills
• GlaxoSmithKline
• Global Hyatt
• Goldman Sachs Group
• Hewlett-Packard
• Intel
• IBM
• Intuit
• J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
• Jenner & Block
• Johnson & Johnson
• Kaiser Permanente
• Keyspan
• Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group
• KPMG
• Kraft Foods
• Lehman Brothers Holdings
• Levi Strauss & Co.
• Lexmark International
• Lincoln National
• Lucent Technologies
• Mellon Financial
• Merrill Lynch
• MetLife
• Microsoft
• Miller Brewing
• Mitchell Gold and Bob Williams
• Molson Coors Brewing
• Morrison & Foerster
• Motorola
• Nationwide
• NCR Corp.
• New York Times Co.
• Nike
• Nordstrom
• Northern Trust
• The Olivia Companies
• Owens Corning
• Pepsico
• Pfizer
• PG&E
• Prudential Financial
• Raytheon
• Replacements
• SBC Communications
• SC Johnson & Son
• Sears, Roebuck and Co.
• Southern California Edison
• Sprint
• Sun Microsystems
• SunTrust Banks
• Tech Data Corp.
• Toyota
• UBS
• Unisys
• US Airways
• Viacom
• Walgreens
• Washington Mutual
• Wells Fargo
• Whirlpool
• Worldspan Technologies
• Wyndham International
• Xerox

If you ever wondered why homosexuals were able to achieve the total undermining of marriage in California the answer is funding from these corporations is the reason why!

When will it stop? Not until homosexuals are de-funded of multimillion dollar donations that they extort from corporations

Finally, buoyed by homosexual’s recent California victory a Michigan homosexual man is suing bible publishers for $70 million dollars for what he calls “homophobic language” that the bible has used over the years that he claims has personal caused him emotional distress and endangered his safety.

Outrageous you think? No so much, if homosexuals can find a court in California to listen to their bogus Civil rights arguments and thereby invent homosexual marriage why not a court to condemn the Christian Bible as unconstitutional on equally bogus civil rights claims of emotional distress and endangerment.

The just cited example only goes to show if homosexual oppressors and their corporate and government backers are not resisted now we can only expect more of the same.

Homosexuals didn't stop at their fake argument that the government should stay out of the bedroom what two people do in privacy is their business. No that argument was only just the beginning because they proudly parade what they do in the nation's streets and in it's the courts now.

Homosexuals will not stop until every man, woman and child in America, no in the world, is force to chant, "Homosexuality is good, anyone who opposes homosexuality is bad!"

Now that's creating Orwellian worldview by Machiavellianism at its very best!

The Man Can't Help It!

Here is a very interesting article that I came across today. Rather then send you to the website, I copied it here. I hope that it enlightens some, and gratifies those of us who saw this coming.

Flipping and Flopping
It's getting difficult to tell whether Obama stands for anything

By Jack Kelly, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
July 10, 2008

It's a good thing many of Barack Obama's supporters don't care much about issues, because their candidate has been changing his position on them with dizzying speed.

"Barack Obama aligned himself with welfare reform on Monday, launching a television ad which touts the way the overhaul 'slashed rolls by 80 percent,' " ABC News reported July 1. "Obama leaves out, however, that he was against the 1996 federal legislation which precipitated the caseload reduction."

When the Supreme Court overturned the District of Columbia ban on handgun ownership June 26, Mr. Obama said he supported the decision of the 5-4 majority. But last November he told the Chicago Tribune he thought the D.C. handgun ban was constitutional. While in the state legislature, he proposed legislation that would, in effect, have banned handguns in Illinois.

Mr. Obama said he disagreed with another 5-4 Supreme Court decision the day before, which struck down a Louisiana law that had authorized the death penalty for someone who rapes a child. When he first ran for the state Senate in 1996, Mr. Obama said he opposed capital punishment, and in the legislature he opposed applying the death penalty to gang murders.

Campaigning in Ohio before the Democratic primary there, Mr. Obama said the North American Free Trade Agreement should be renegotiated. One of his economic advisers, University of Chicago professor Austan Goolsbee, told a Canadian official that Mr. Obama's anti-NAFTA rhetoric "should be viewed as more about political positioning than a clear articulation of policy plans."

When the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. reported this, the Obama campaign initially denied that Mr. Goolsbee had met with the Canadian consul in Chicago and then claimed he had been misquoted. After the CBC provided conclusive proof both of the meeting and what Mr. Goolsbee had said, Mr. Obama distanced himself from his economic adviser.

No longer. In an interview with Nina Easton of Fortune magazine published June 18, Mr. Obama said he didn't want unilaterally to reopen negotiations on NAFTA. "Sometimes during a campaign the rhetoric gets overheated and amplified," he said.

Last August, Mr. Obama called for easing the economic embargo on Cuba. When he was running for the U.S. Senate in 2003, he indicated he favored lifting it entirely. But in a speech to the Cuban American National Foundation May 23, Mr. Obama said he'd maintain the embargo.

Last September, Mr. Obama said he would accept federal matching funds for the general election campaign if his GOP opponent did the same. But on June 19, he announced he wouldn't. The reason was simple. The Obama campaign thinks it can raise more than twice as much as the $85 million he'd get from the feds. The flip-flop probably would have gone down better if he hadn't offered a transparently phony rationale for it.

"Mr. Obama had an opportunity here to demonstrate that he really is a different kind of politician, willing to put principles and the promises he has made above political calculation. He made a different choice," said The Washington Post in an editorial. "Fine. Politicians do what politicians need to do. But they ought to spare us the self-congratulatory back-patting while they're doing it."

Mr. Obama said on Jan. 28 that he would "strongly oppose" an intelligence surveillance bill that provided retroactive immunity from lawsuits to telephone companies that cooperated with the U.S. government. But on June 20, he announced he'd support a bill that does just that.

Supply and Demands

Abdalla Salem El-Badri, left, the OPEC secretary general, met in April with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran. (Morteza Nikoubazl/Reuters)

The head of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries warned Thursday that oil prices would see an "unlimited" increase in the case of a military conflict involving Iran…

"We really cannot replace Iran 's production - it's not feasible to replace it," Abdalla Salem El-Badri, the OPEC secretary general, said during an interview.—James Kanter, IHT

Gasoline is just under $5.00 a gallon in some parts of the United States and you’re probably driving less, I know I am, do you still believe in the theory of supply side economics?

I’m thinking that current gasoline prices have very little to do with the supply of oil and a lot to do with demands made by oil producing Nations. (see here)

OPEC pumps about 40% of the world oil supply which seems to make them feel that they are entitled to make demands on the world! Its supply side economics gone jihad, here’s why I say that.

OPEC just pronounced that if there is any attack on Iran gas prices would raise precipitously without any restraint. This somewhat oblique warning seems to test just were the balance of world power resides. Given that there has been no equal warning or restraint demanded on Iran’s calls for Israel’s destruction by President of Iran Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

No longer should there be any doubt as to who is in control of the world. Oil is the life’s blood of the world and in a not so veiled threat OPEC has declared its protection of Iran and demands that those who threaten Iran back off.

So it would seem that it is OPEC that is controlling the price of oil in world markets and equally it would seem that they are at fault for the high gasoline prices in consumer nations, but not so says OPEC.

OPEC has been saying, as early as 2007 that increased oil supply will not bring the price of gasoline down. OPEC says there are causes for high gas prices other than supply and demand.

As reported in October 2007 in the International Herald Tribune representatives from top oil producing countries Tuesday blamed the steady advance of oil toward $100 a barrel on a combination of financial speculation, geopolitical instability and a shortfall in refining capacity.

The president of OPEC, Mohammed bin Dhaen al-Hamli, who is also the oil minister of the United Arab Emirates, pledged to keep markets amply supplied. But at an oil industry conference in London, he said there was only so much OPEC could do in the current circumstances to keep a lid on prices.

"Increasingly oil markets are being driven by forces beyond OPEC's control, such as geopolitical events and the growing influence of financial investors," Hamli said. "We are of course concerned about the high level of oil prices."

This directly contradicts proponents of supply side economics. According to CNN crude oil prices are driven largely by fluctuations in the global supply and demand.

Gas price increases in recent years have been due in part to crude oil production limits set by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, and rising demand across the globe, especially in countries like China and India. Instability in key oil-producing countries can also affect the supply of crude oil.

The purchasing power of the dollar also has an impact because oil is bought in dollars in every world market. If the dollar is cheaper against foreign currencies, U.S. consumers will pay more at the pump.

In addition to that in 1999 OPEC worked to convince all oil producing nations to cut the world supply of oil by 3%

With remarkable speed and unity, OPEC clinched a far-reaching agreement with four independent oil-producing nations today to cut world output by 2.1 million barrels a day. The move, if carried out, would significantly reduce the supply of crude oil and drive up the price of gasoline and other fuel.

The pact, announced here, is to take effect on April 1 and last for a year. It would reduce daily world oil production of 70 million barrels by about 3 percent.

The deal was reached despite resilient skepticism about the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries' ability to stop cheating by its own members. On the contrary, there is now considerable optimism that the cutbacks will work.

One would think that if OPEC believes that cutting supply would raise the price of oil then increasing supply would lower prices.

This too, OPEC controls the output of its members through a production quota system designed to influence the price of oil. Quotas are set at regular meetings.

But contrary to the reality of what is happening Saudi economist Ali al-Dakkak said world prices were being driven by "wild speculation" and a lack of refining capacity in consumer countries, especially the United States.

Al-Dakkak adds, "Consumer demands for increasing output are politically motivated." —Worldnews Australia

Consumer demands for increasing output are politically motivated? And here I thought that not being able to drive my car and feed my family at the same time motivated me and millions of American consumers of gasoline to demand more output of oil, silly me!

In Venezuela gasoline is $0.12 a gallon in Kuwait it is $.078 a gallon, in Saudi Arabia it is $0.91 a gallon so why doesn’t fluctuations in the global supply and demand affect these prices to the extent that the U.S. prices are affected? (see here)

I’ll tell you why because it is just the reverse of Saudi economist Ali al-Dakkak’s statement, the exorbitant increases in oil and gasoline prices are politically motivated not the other way around.

Finally there has been a 25% reduction in combined expenses to produce oil for the OPEC nations and a 181.15% increase in price to consumer nations that’s a 206.15% increase in profitability over the period 2000-2007 to April 2008 (see here)

This means that lower cost to produce the oil, higher profits based on higher pricing and political posturing point to OPEC manipulation of oil supplies and prices to make demands to control world events and world politics which is very bad for the Western world.

A virtually new OPEC spin on supply and demand to the Western world. "If you don't do what I demand, then I won't supply the oil that you need!"

Another Stupid Remark!

That’s a boy, Obama.......... Sometime’s its better to
remain silent and have people think you are stupid,
than to open your mouth and remove all doubt!

Add this one to his long, long list of ridiculous or
supremely impractical proposals, and you have an
improving picture of who this man Obama really is!

Today’s Rasmussen Reports states............Barack
Obama said yesterday that “instead of worrying about
whether immigrants can learn English,” Americans
“need to make sure your child can speak Spanish.”
Nothing like a blatant attempt to garner the Spanish
vote in the US.

A national telephone survey conducted last month by
Rasmussen Reports found that U.S. voters overwhelmingly
disagree with the presumptive Democratic presidential
nominee.

This man is a total danger to America, and would drag
us down to the level of a Third World Country, by among
other things, forcing a multi-lingual society on us.
It’s bad enough now, that you can’t converse with half
the people who are in “customer service” in many companies,
can you imagine what his proposal would bring? Chaos would
be putting it mildly!

Obama is heavily influenced by Europe, but have you noticed
that in France they wont speak English to you, even as a visitor? French for the French! That is even reflected in Quebec....... where they turn their noses up if you try to
speak English to them. HOWEVER...... Obama totally ignores
the GOOD from France. Like the fact that they get 87% of
their electricity from nuclear power....... a fact that he conveniently ignores.

It is now obvious that those who were so enamored by this
“flash in the pan” contrived and created candidate, are
beginning to see where he is coming from. Finally, a
light at the end of the tunnel, which IS an oncoming train.

New polls show Obama slipping in many states.... among
them one of the Democratic strongholds.................
my home state, New Jersey. The Party of failure has always
called this one of their “guaranteed” wins. Well guess what?...........it is no longer the unwritten rule that if
you are Republican or Conservative and live in New Jersey...
don’t bother to vote, because the Electoral Votes belong to
the Democrats. More and more the Republican strongholds
within the state are making their voices heard......... and
I doubt that Lautenberg will make it to Congress after November this year.

I predict that McCain will trounce Obama on Election Day,
and take back some of the Congressional seats deceptively
taken by the Democrats in the last cycle. Pelosi and Reid had their chance to back their lies and empty promises with action, which obviously didn’t come! This Congress holds the all-time record as the least capable and productive in history........9% approval rating. And they have the gall to point to President Bush, who holds a 25% rating.

When it comes right down to it, the voters will see through
this ruse that the Democrats and the Main Stream Media have fostered upon the American people. This Obama is not the
“savior of the country” as he has been promoted. He is
divisive and controversial and cut from the same lowly public servant cloth as all the other ambitious politicians that
have come up from the liberal ranks. The only difference
between him and them was the ‘perceived’ one, that he would
be the instrument of change, because he was not a
“Washington insider”. Well.............guess what? He not
only hid his true self from the voters, he may even have
fooled his own party.......................(but I doubt it)!

Scaring Kids to Save the Planet!

Kevin Rudd, Australian Prime Minister

PSYCHIATRISTS have detected the first case of "climate change delusion"—Andrew Bolt, reporter for the Herald Sun

A Seventeen year old adolescent (which Mr. Bolt referred to as a man) was admitted to the psychiatric unit at Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne in Melbourne Australia.

The boy was diagnosed as depressed, delusional and given to visions of apocalyptic events.

According to Bolt the boy also developed the belief that, due to climate change, his own water consumption could lead within days to the deaths of millions of people through exhaustion of water supplies." He became too terrified to even drink according to the report. (see story)

So now Global warming fear mongers have succeeded in scaring the water out of a 17 year old kid with their incessant droning-ons about “apocalypse now” also known as climate change, well that was their intent. Right!

There is nothing like a scared global population when you are attempting to impose a global taxation scheme to the tune of $45 trillion dollars.

You thought we had it bad in America? You do realize that Australia has newly elected Prime Minister Kevin Rudd on his platform to fight global warming unlike the Conservative John Howard he defeated.

Under Rudd’s leadership the whole government of Australia has given in to global warming hysteria to which some of its children are now afraid to drink water for fear that, that too will cause climate change.

Rudd paints his own picture of earth’s doom:

"If we do not begin reducing the nation's levels of carbon pollution, Australia's economy will face more frequent and severe droughts, less water, reduced food production and devastation of areas such as the Great Barrier Reef and Kakadu wetlands."—Kevin Rudd, Prime Minister of Australia

Rudd has a James Hansen like Al Gore has, he is Professor Ross Garnaut and he is also in the climate change scare business.

"Australians must pay more for petrol, food and energy or ultimately face a rising death toll . . ."—Professor Ross Garnaut

No wonder the children in Australia are peeing in their pants!


In the United State both candidates, Senator Barack Obama and Senator John McCain have indicated that they too will back the theory of anthropogenic climate change which only means that they too are willing to scare teens and babies for the huge moneyed interests who are promoting global warming for dollars.

Climate change delusion, we already knew that Al Gore, James Hansen and the like were delusional but now they are affecting and scaring our kids and that is not acceptable.

The media needs to cease and desist in aiding these fear monger’s attempts to extort money from the world’s people and tell the truth concerning the cooling earth that scientist say that is actually occurring.

At the very least, stop scaring our kids with bogus climate change claims!

The G8 Tilts at Solar Windmills

Chinese and Indian leaders have been reluctant to make commitments on cutting gases, arguing that they are not responsible for decades' accumulation of carbon levels in the atmosphere, and that developed countries have a moral obligation to lead in cutting emissions. -- Don Lee

How does one do battle with the bogeyman? How do you slay a dragon? Or why would you spend 45 trillion dollars to tilt at windmills?

Don Quiote believed that windmills were dragons, could the most power men and woman in the world believe in anthropogenic Global Warming?

Apparently the G8 is considering the answers to all of the above. That is the undertaking that they have agreed to as they have pledged to seek, to consider and adopt as a goal the cutting in half of greenhouse gases and the reduction of carbon emissions by 2050 but only if China and Indian agree that their countries will do the same. (see here)

China and Indian looking to their own economic self interests wish to remain unencumbered by any agreement on economy restrictive emission reduction regulations voicing the point that all ready developed nations have caused the problem, their countries are only just beginning to pollute the atmoshere.

This argument falls flat when people understand that China now has become the single worst emitter of so-called green house gases.

Even so, the simple pledge that the G8 made has infuriated environmentalist that front for Investment speculators who are using Global warming/Climate Change as the next multi-trillion dollar commodities trading market. The world’s leader’s cautious approach is just not fast enough for those who are lining up to cash in on Global warming. (See video)



It doesn’t matter that it has all been disproved, carbon emissions are not heating up our planet, our planet has not heated up since 2003 and scientist say that it may not heat up again until 2015. There is no carbon emission caused global warming so why are the heads of the industrial free world swearing on their sacred honor to seek, to consider to adopt as a goal binding resolutions to cut carbon emissions?

Pressure! The whole world has gone after Al Gore’s debunked theory and rather than show leadership and denounce the folly world leaders do what politicians are good at doing, giving in to what is popular but wrong.
As founder of the weather channel John Coleman has said Global warming is a fraud.

Here are John’s own comments on the subject:

Hello Al Gore; Hello UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Your science is flawed; your hypothesis is wrong; your data is manipulated. And, may I add, your scare tactics are deplorable. The Earth does not have a fever. Carbon dioxide does not cause significant global warming.

The focus on atmospheric carbon dioxide grew out a study by Roger Revelle who was an esteemed scientist at the Scripps Oceanographic Institute. He took his research with him when he moved to Harvard and allowed his students to help him process the data for his paper. One of those students was Al Gore. That is where Gore got caught up in this global warming frenzy.

Revelle’s paper linked the increases in carbon dioxide, CO2, in the atmosphere with warming. It labeled CO2 as a greenhouse gas.

Charles Keeling, another researcher at the Scripps Oceanographic Institute, set up a system to make continuous CO2 measurements. His graph of these increases has now become known as the Keeling Curve. When Charles Keeling died in 2005, his son David, also at Scripps, took over the measurements. Here is what the Keeling curve shows: an increase in CO2 from 315 parts per million in 1958 to 385 parts per million today, an increase of 70 parts per million or about 20 percent.

All the computer models, all of the other findings, all of the other angles of study, all come back to and are based on CO2 as a significant greenhouse gas. It is not.

Here is the deal about CO2, carbon dioxide. It is a natural component of our atmosphere. It has been there since time began. It is absorbed and emitted by the oceans. It is used by every living plant to trigger photosynthesis. Nothing would be green without it. And we humans; we create it. Every time we breathe out, we emit carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. It is not a pollutant. It is not smog. It is a naturally occurring invisible gas.

Let me illustrate. I estimate that this square in front of my face contains 100,000 molecules of atmosphere. Of those 100,000 only 38 are CO2; 38 out of a hundred thousand. That makes it a trace component. Let me ask a key question: how can this tiny trace upset the entire balance of the climate of Earth? It can’t. That’s all there is to it; it can’t.

The UN IPCC has attracted billions of dollars for the research to try to make the case that CO2 is the culprit of run-away, man-made global warming. The scientists have come up with very complex creative theories and done elaborate calculations and run computer models they say prove those theories.—John Coleman, Founder of the Weather Channel

The G8 would do good to steer away from the politically correct debunked non-science of Global warming and address real problems like restraining free market economies that are attempting to take over the world.

But that’s just my opinion!

It Amazes Me!!!!!!

It never ceases to amaze me that so many liberals,
and Democrats in particular, continue to hang onto
the myth that a Democratic Congress was going to do
anything to improve the lives of Americans.

For the most part, they are just a bunch of self-serving
hypocrits, who created a tsunami of criticism aimed at
any Republicans who held office during the last election
cycle. Needless to say, most of what they played on the
national stage, was either totally fabricated or blown
so totally out of proportion, that the American voter
was led to believe that all Republicans and conservatives
were involved in graft, corruption and sex scandals.

Actually.......... the opposite is true! Check any
website that lists and elaborates on Congressional scandals
going back to Boss Tweed, to present. There have been
more Democrats involved in corruption and sex escapades
than any Republicans ever could be.

In addition to the myth that the Democrats created about
Republican congressmen, they forever pound the "approval
rating" of President Bush..... as the lowest of any
President in memory. Well guess what???? This particular
Congress holds the ALL TIME RECORD for the LOWEST APPROVAL
RATING of ANY CONGRESS IN HISTORY. According to Rasmussen's
political polls, Nancy Pelosi's and Harry Reid's gang, has
a SINGLE DIGET approval rating.

Read it and weep you creeps!!!!!!...........

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/congressional_performance/congressional_performance

California’s Fools Gold!

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger

As Californians brace for big reductions in government services, the possibility of tax hikes and a long summer of budget bickering, they may be under the impression that everyone else is slogging through the same financial misery.

Not so.

Analysts say the state's troubles stem largely from its budget system -- the most dysfunctional in the country -- and they look to California as an example of how not to do things. In a recent ranking of state policies by the Pew Center on the States, California scored D+ on fiscal management. The average grade was B-.--Evan Halper, Los Angeles Times

California the State that is primarily concerned with Homosexual mock-marriages, Global warming, providing sanctuary to illegal aliens, and a multi-million dollar voter initiative stem cell research tax payers grant is in fiscal trouble, hum I wonder why?

Tax payers don’t usually like being ripped off unless of course it is for a good purpose like stem cell research. If it is stem cell research then please take 3 billion dollars that’s what the state of California is being fleeced for.

Did I say fleeced? Are the tax payers of the state of California going to be ripped off? Usually when one speaks of stem cells it is in noble terms as in regenerating damaged nerves for someone like Christopher Reeves to walking again, growing vital organs, and even producing body parts. That’s the misdirection, the reality is the real backers of stem cell research are profiteers who plan to use publicly-funded government research to yield usurious private profits for themselves.--Alaphiah

The state of California recalled one Governor, Gray Davis, only to replace him with a RINO, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Schwarzenegger gives one an indication of how John McCain would govern as President of the United States with a Democrat controlled Congress. McCain has already embraced most of the non-Conservative issues that Schwarzenegger governs by.

A Republican in name only and a liberal Democrat controlled state legislature presides over the dysfunctional almost bankrupted government of California, which by the way is a virtual Liberal’s Nirvana, and is a model of where the United States is headed. As the saying is, “As California goes so goes the nation.”

If one ever wished to see what the world would be like if Liberals ran everything one only has to look to California. Liberals have run the state of California into the ground for decades and it’s only getting worst! In a recent Pew research study California’s fiscal management comes in dead last!

California starts the new budget year today -- and once again no budget is in place.

Legislators are making little progress closing a $15.2-billion shortfall. Democrats demand new taxes. Republicans say that is out of the question. Meanwhile, their inability to strike a deal threatens millions of Californians who rely on the government for healthcare and other services.—Evan Halper

California the once golden state, the state where speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi and Senators Diana Feinstein and Barbara Boxer all hail from, the state that’s golden luster has been tarnished by special interest control over its Supreme Court, Governor and Legislative branch is a study in what not to do in government.

California is a study of what not to do at any and all levels of government, fiscal or social

Of the 46 states that began their fiscal year on Tuesday, California is one of just four that still have no spending plan. Lawmakers are nowhere near agreement on how to patch a $15.2-billion shortfall, and the budget will probably include borrowing, accounting shifts and other maneuvers that make money managers cringe.

An outdated tax code, voter-approved initiatives that lock in billions of dollars for programs, inadequate oversight of spending and the lack of a substantial rainy-day fund all add to California 's financial ills. Other states have addressed such issues with impressive results. But attempts at similar changes here routinely fall flat.-- Evan Halper, Los Angeles Times

Nationally Democrats are succeeding in convincing the people that more Democrats would solve the nation’s ills but a reality check of the ultra-Democratic state of California which is a strong-hold for Liberal Democrats in and outside of government is a reminder to us all that too many Liberals means dysfunction and a government wrought with overspending and high taxes.

Let California’s troubles be a warning to the rest of the Nation.

IT’S THE STUPID PEOPLE, STUPID!

Rick Shenkman author of the book, “Just How Stupid Are We? Facing the Truth About the American Voter”

Has a five point Duncecap score card to test just how stupid American politics has become.

Shenkman’s five points are as follows;

First, is sheer ignorance: Ignorance of critical facts about important events in the news, and ignorance of how our government functions and who’s in charge.

Second, is negligence: The disinclination to seek reliable sources of information about important news events.

Third, is wooden-headedness, as the historian Barbara Tuchman defined it: The inclination to believe what we want to believe regardless of the facts.

Fourth, is shortsightedness: The support of public policies that are mutually exclusive, or contrary to the country’s long-term interests.

Fifth, and finally, is a broad category I call bone-headedness, for want of a better name: The susceptibility to meaningless phrases, stereotypes, irrational biases, and simplistic diagnoses and solutions that play on our hopes and fears.

The Democrat Party first coined the phase, “It’s the economy, stupid” used by Bill Clinton in his presidential campaign.

Since then the phrase has taken on a life of its own and like the franchise “(insert name here) for Dummies,” the bright yellow book that would lead us stupid dummies around by the hand on any given subject, the phrase,"It's the(blank)stupid" means to tell us that everything from the economy to our politics are the obvious reasons for our troubles, so plan is it that we have to be stupid not to understand it.

Speaking of stupid I’m thinking of the last three offerings for President that the Democrats have made to the American people; Al Gore, John Kerry and now Barack Obama (or Hillary Clinton who has just suspended her campaign just in case something were to happen) and I’m thinking there must be a reason that the American people rejected Democrats twice and potentially a third time.

It then became so obvious to me that the reason Barack Obama is running as the candidate of change is because the American people can’t and couldn’t stomach the political bile and socially corrupting policies that Democrats offer every Presidential election cycle. Democrats, It your politics, stupid!

That gives me great optimism that Democrats will have the same results in this election year as they had in 2000 and 2004 even if the Republican candidate is an old white guy.

That old white guy, in my opinion, is better than Democrat’s stupid politics and this guy. (See videos)

Barack Obama at Bristol Va. Townhall meeting June 5, 2008



And this!



I think these truths are self evident that our politics have become stupid, stupid!

Not to mention that Democrat candidates need plenty of sleep!

Happy 232 birthday America

HBO’s mini series John Adams scene thirteen colonies vote for independence

Global warming is not Science

Last week marked the 20th anniversary of the mass hysteria phenomenon known as global warming. Much of the science has since been discredited.

NASA now begrudgingly confirms that the hottest year on record in the continental 48 was not 1998, as previously believed, but 1934, and that six of the 10 hottest years since 1880 antedate 1954. Data from 3,000 scientific robots in the world's oceans show there has been slight cooling in the past five years, never mind that "80% to 90% of global warming involves heating up ocean waters," according to a report by NPR's Richard Harris.-- BRET STEPHENS

Bret Stephens’ “Global Warming as Mass Neurosis” explains that Global warming is not science and that its proponents offer religious like claims about Global warming which are to be believed by faith in spite of the physical evidence that the Earth is actually cooling.

Stephens offers three reasons why Liberals blindly follow Global warming propaganda.

Ideological convenience, theological replacement, and Munchausen syndrome

According to Stephens, global warming is a hodge-podge of all Left leaning Ideological beliefs conveniently wrapped up into and ultimately resulting in a cataclysmic eco- disaster.

Then Stephen seems to suggest that global warming allows the Liberal to replace belief in God and God’s judgment on the earth and man with an animist paganism which ironically has nature pronouncing judgment on man via itself.

Lastly Munchausen syndrome according to the Cleveland clinic, is a type of factitious disorder, or mental illness, in which a person repeatedly acts as if he or she has a physical or mental disorder when, in truth, they have caused the symptoms. People with factitious disorders act this way because of an inner need to be seen as ill or injured


Likewise, Global warming proponents have an unhealthy need to see the earth as injured by mankind (more correctly that would be Munchausen syndrome by proxy). So they have created the perfect multi-symptom conflicted affliction in which the phenomena of cooling or heating, storms or lack of storms, floods or droughts are all symptomatic of Global warming.

Stephens concludes that global warming is not science at all and its adherents are merely sick-souled believers in a theory that is a sick-souled religion.

Somebody’s been listening to too much Al Gore

Senator Harry Reid (D-Nevada)
He’s the gift that keeps on giving, if there were ever a reason we needed to be reminded that Democrats should not be empowered to put their ideas into action Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid convinces us once again that, “ No, I may not like the other guy but I’m sure in hell not going to let this guy out of the insane asylum!” (See Video)



Come on now, if Senate Major Leader Harry Reid really believed what he just stated it would be criminal for him and his fellow Democrats not to attempt to pass legislation to immediately stop all coal and gasoline (fossil fuel) production and consumption in the United States.

If Reid actually though coal and gasoline is making us sick shouldn’t he and his fellow Democrats stop wasting time attempting to cancel out the second amendment and simply ban all gas using engines? After all gas engines are not a guaranteed constitutional right and more people are killed by cars than guns in America.

But as yet not one piece of legislation has been written and put forth to stop all coal and gasoline produce.

Since there is no legislation pending in the Democrat controlled Congress to stop and end all gasoline and coal production I would have to assume that Sen. Reid is not really sincere about his assessment regarding coal and fuel.

Unless he does believe what he says but he doesn’t care about the American people’s welfare.

Now I’m not advocating a ban on gasoline run engines that would be silly almost as silly as Senator Reid talking about Global warming and putting carbon in the air.

I’m just saying as a Carbon-based life form that 100% of all life on earth is carbon based. Carbon is the primary building block for all life, animal, insect or plant.

Senator Reid where did you get your information that carbon is making us sick, because whether you realize it or not, Senator Reid, carbon is essential.

Carbon is not the problem Senator Reid only Carbon-based Democrat Senators and Carbon-based Liberals who are attempting to erase all carbon from the universe, they are the problem!

I Can’t Stop Laughing Must Be Silly Season Once Again

Ret. Gen. Wesley Clark

I have to say, Barack Obama has not had any of those experiences either—Bob Scheiffer, To Face the Nation

I almost fell out of my seat laughing watching Ret. Gen. Wesley Clark’s assault on Sen. John McCain.

I thought what temerity and out right brazenness the Democrats have. They offered up two candidates in Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton with absolutely no executive experience, with absolutely no military experience and now they want to attack a candidate that has that experience.

I’m still laughing at the look on Wesley Clark’s face when Bob Scheiffer interrupted him and said, “I have to say, Barack Obama has not had any of these experiences either”

And this is the funny part, in election 2004 it was all about who had the military experience Sen. Kerry even had home made videos as proof that he was in Vietnam commanding a little swiftboat. Interesting enough that was plenty of necessary experience for the Democrats then. Not to mention that according to Democrat’s President Bush’s military experience was fraudulent.

So now here’s Wesley Clark he can’t say that Sen. McCain didn’t actually fly combat missions in the war, and Clark can’t actually say that Sen. McCain didn’t actually have a large squadron Air command in the Navy but what he can say is what McCain did was not good enough for Democrats.

What Wesley Clark can say is that a two term Senate political neophyte with absolutely no credentials is better than any credentials that a Republican who has served in the Senate 21 years and has greater experience in politics, military and governess than Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama combined.

Well its silly season and Democrats have started the season up by taking aim at Sen. McCain’s strongest attribute his distinguished military service.

When fellow Democrat and rival Sen. Clinton took aim at Senator Obama’s life style and education in the Democrat primary by calling him an elitist Sen. Obama took note,

“When somebody makes that argument, particularly given that I've spent my entire life working with workers in low-income communities to try to make people's lives a little bit better, that's when you know you're in political silly season, [t]his is what we do politically when we start getting behind in races, and we start going on the attack.”—Sen Barack Obama

I guess Silly Season was declared early by Sen. Obama’s camp on Sen. McCain via Obama supporter Wesley Clark particularly given that Sen. McCain spent so much of his life in service to his country in the military and as a private citizen.

Quitters never Win

Fred Barnes

Might these Republicans one day regret their decision to retire? McCrery muses about a failed Barack Obama presidency, pulled down by tax hikes and excessive spending and too many favors for organized labor. If that happens, Republicans could do as well in 2010 as they did in 1994.

"If I thought I had a better than 50-50 chance of being chairman next year, I'd run," he says. But he's not running precisely because he doesn't think that. –Fred Barnes, the Weekly Standard

Fred Barnes reports on a phenomenon that I wrote about previously, Republicans who will not fight for Conservative principles. Here and here.

Unlike their Democrat counterpoints it seems that Republicans are selfish weak-hearted quitters that do not have the courage of their convictions.

And if America is on its way to hell in a hand basket you can thank these hapless Republicans for clearing the road to make a more safe and comfortable trip.

Jim McCrery of Louisiana, Ray LaHood of Illinois, Tom Reynolds of New York, and Tom Davis of Virginia are only a few Republicans who knowing the great peril that their country and their Party faces are quitting thereby making their Party’s prospects even bleaker.

Yes these men have served their country same for 20 to 35 years and now because they are out of power they are quitting.

Why? No elected Conservative leadership that’s why. All twelve years that Republicans were in power in both houses of Congress they were a fractured and splintered group.

At the same time that they were being undermined by the Democrats, who were in the minority for the twelve years that Republicans were in power, Republicans that were sympathetic to their Democrat rivals were also undermining their own Party.

Not to mention that Republicans rejected their own Conservative principles and fell subject to corruption, overspending and they rejected Republican Party loyalty for titles like maverick, moderate or compassionate.

Republicans have no one to blame. No one but themselves, they rather quit than fight that’s why I recommended that all incumbent RINOs be challenged in their primaries by Conservatives so that the rebuilding of the Party can begin.

Does this mean WAR?

Mexican Militia captured on U.S. soil

Your government failed you. Those entrusted with protecting you failed you. And I failed you.—Richard Clark, Clinton and Bush Counter-terrorism Advisor, before the 911 Commission

Richard Clark’s plaintive wail before the 911 commission was only a partial admission of guilt for the role that he played over two presidential administrations and his personal failure to help protect the American people from Islamic terrorism on 9/11/2001.

Pro Bush advocates have proudly proclaimed that there hasn’t been another terrorist attack on U.S. soil since 9/11 well there has been now!

Years of un-enforced borders has manifested in the unthinkable. Just as prior to 9/11 no one would have thought terrorist would hijack planes and commit acts of terrorism on American soil, but we should have learned a lesson from our mistakes right?

Wrong! Though the American people have pleaded with the Bush administration and a Democrat Controlled U.S. Congress to enforce the border between Mexico and the United States by wall, fence and/or increased government patrol the American people’s pleads largely have fallen on deaf ears.

This blatant disregard for border security from our government has resulted in a small group of 8 Mexican terrorists crossing over into the United States over the Phoenix Arizona border and assaulting a home with a 50 to 100 round assault rifle attack and killing the resident either on Sunday June 22, 2008 or on Monday June 23, 2008 as reported by Phoenix police. (see here)

This is an outrage. The first terrorist attack on U.S. soil since 9/11 and it is not being reported by the media? Check your sources you would not have known about this incident if you would not have read about it here! (See story)

This Mexican militia or military attack was planned to be a home invasion and murder and it was.

Need I say it again? A Mexican terrorist militia illegally crossed over into America invaded a home and killed an occupant after 50 to 100 assault rifle rounds were spent and no one is up in arms about it?

Allow me to speculate why, first this is an election year and it involves one of the presidential nominee’s home state. Second this nominee has been a proponent of illegal entry into the United States and open borders. And third this story totally destroys the media’s narrative of the poor illegal crossing to make a better life causing no harm to the mean old Americans who would construct a fence to keep him or her out.

Four of the Mexican terrorists were able to elude police officers and sneak back across the border and four were captured.

Information from one of the suspects on McDowell indicated all the suspects are Mexican Military coming into the United States with full tactical gear and police raid shirts to conduct home invasions. According to the same suspect, they were planning on ambushing the officers following them but, didn’t only because they didn’t have any ammunition left.

In addition, some of these terrorist where captured when their ammunition gave out but they claimed that their mission included killing police officers that interfered with their plans.

Following is an interview from a Phoenix radio station interviewing Mark Spenser Phoenix Law Enforcement Association (PLEA) listen here(may need to have QuickTime)9mins

After this story broke there were those who attempt to play it down as a drug related incident between feuding drug cartels that hire some of the Mexican military to do their bidding. That would indicate that the South American drug war has spilled across the border into the United States. update listen here 2:16mins


Even if this is true that doesn’t lessen the danger to Americans, that only increases it! Because Mexican drug cartels are in fact killing all who oppose them in Mexico, they have no fear of government officials or the police.

This is the first terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11 and because it may affect the outcome of the 2008 election the media isn’t covering it and you would not have heard of it if you did not read it here! See police interoffice memos here and here.

This is but another example, in Richard Clark’s words, that our government has failed us.

Countries have gone to war over lesser offenses! Ironically in this case it would be over no fences.

Utah’s vote is a RINO killer

Rep. Chris Cannon

Republican voters in Utah ousted Rep. Chris Cannon in Tuesday’s GOP primary, expressing their dissatisfaction with the six-term congressman over his left-of-center positions on immigration by nominating a challenger who made crackdowns on illegal immigration a central part of his platform.--Josh Kraushaar, The Crypt

Utah’s Congressman challenger Jason Chaffetz beat 6 term incumbent Congressman Chris Cannon in their Republican primary battle by promising to do the job that no American Senator or Congressman will do.

Way to go Utah! By ousting Chris Cannon a proponent of amnesty and the Dream Act, legislation that would confer rights and privileges on the fruits of illegality, you have shown the rest of us in America how to get our country back.

Thank you Utah for setting an example that there are Americans who still care about this country and are willing to do the right thing rather than the politically expedite thing or the politically popular thing.

The Republican Party is at this crossroads where it is attempting to decide whether it is going in the direction of the John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and Arnold Schwarzenegger RINO Democrat mini-mes or whether it will keep to the traditional Ronald Reagan, Newt Gingrich Republican brand.

Utah your vote for Jason Chaffetz adds one more, true Conservative to the fight to wrestle our government back from the hands of special interests and Liberals who would change America for the worst not the better.

Becoming a citizen of the United States of America is earned and means something special. We are the envy of the world and it is no wonder why. We are the nation that empowers the individual with life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. We are also a nation of laws, guided by a Constitution, to ensure those rights.

The Constitution gives Congress the responsibility “to establish a uniform rule of naturalization.” We have a duty and responsibility to the legal citizens to set the terms of entry and exit. Currently, we are being unfairly asked to subsidize and tolerate a mass of illegal people flooding our country. This is a failure of Congress and an unprecedented unfunded mandate upon the states. –Jason Chaffetz

All Americans used to know things like this Congressman nominee Chaffetz, it is sad to say that you will be a minority in an institution that has lost its way.

But you will also be a great inspiration to the millions upon millions of Conservatives who had lost all hope and had resigned themselves to the inevitability of Liberal Democrats taking this country in the wrong direction without so much as a fight.

By Utah’s example we can still save this country from utter ruination by rejecting incumbents like Chris Cannon who because they are ensconced in their positions of power believe that they can look after the interests of lobbyist and special interest organizations rather than the interests of their constituents the American people.

Again, way to go Utah!

Here we go again!

Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, left, accompanied by Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass. The bearers of bad ideas

Funds and banks around the world have taken hits because they purchased bonds, or risk related to bonds, backed by bad [U.S.] home loans, often bundled into financial instruments called collateralized debt obligations, or C.D.O.’s.-- JENNY ANDERSON and HEATHER TIMMONS

How have we arrive at the Global mortgage crisis? That’s right I remember, banks and other loaning institutions made bad loans to people who couldn’t afford to pay for mortgages and here.

And how does the U.S. Congress intend to remedy the situation? Why by creating more bad loans that people can’t afford and passing that bad debt on directly to the American tax payer and calling that a housing rescue plan.

The mortgage aid plan would let the Federal Housing Administration back $300 billion in new, cheaper home loans for an estimated 400,000 distressed borrowers who otherwise would be considered too financially risky to qualify for government-insured, fixed-rate loans.-- JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS

Let’s see a Democrat lead Congress’s approval rating is at an abysmal 12%, that’s an historical low and that’s about 12 points lower than President Bush, and to give the stupid American people something that would make the people think better of Congress this Congress offers up more bad home loans!

"We need to demonstrate to people in this country that have lost an awful lot of faith in almost everything, but certainly in (Congress), that we can get something done, that we can put aside differences and make a difference in their lives,"—Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn)

Interestingly enough Democrat Sens. Dodd and Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., got preferential home loans from Countrywide Financial Corp. (CFC), a lender at the center of the subprime mortgage mess. Yeah that’s a faith restorer Sen. Dodd!

I say that we just call this what it really is Democrats attempting to buy the Presidency, instead of a chicken in every pot how’s about a new home to put that pot and chicken in!

But at what cost, it seems Democrats are not asking that question.

"They expect the federal government to turn their backs on responsible lenders and borrowers and renters waiting - waiting - to become first-time homeowners, and support those groups that have pushed our housing market into decline with bad loans and bad investments," said Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyo. "This bill is a federal government bailout."

This bill is a federal government bailout which means that Democrats in an election year are attempting to curry favor with the American people with a bill that will increase the U.S. deficit and further injure the U.S. economy.

Yes Americans need mortgage relief but not in this fashion Senators. What Americans need are the high paying jobs that we once had before Congress allowed American Corporations to outsource high paying jobs to India and China.

In case anyone in Congress is listening Americans don’t need more bad loans Senators. What Americans need is their jobs back; blue collar, white collar jobs, manufacturing jobs, farming jobs, and professional jobs.

All Congress needs to do is protect the American people from American Corporations that game the American economy. Corporations that put profit over people by moving jobs to foreign markets to capitalize on lower wages. You do that Senators and we’ll buy and pay for our own damn houses!

Graham wins primary: You’ve got to be kidding South Carolina!

U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) speaks as (L-R) Sen. Mel Martinez (R-FL), Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), and Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-MA)

South Carolina's Lindsey Graham is a flop. He pretends to be a conservative, but sells out conservatives and insults them while doing so. He pretends to be effective at reaching across party lines, but the only thing he effectively does is help the other party.

He inhabits the Senate seat of Strom Thurmond, legendary for great attention to his South Carolina constituents, but Graham spends most of his time trailing behind John McCain like a valet as McCain criss-crosses the country in pursuit of the presidency. He called Ted Kennedy "one of the most principled men I've ever met."

In sum, in the words of conservative movement stalwart Richard Viguerie, "Lindsey Graham is part of the problem."-- Quin Hillyer

How did Sen. Lindsey Graham win the South Carolina primary over Republican challenger Buddy Witherspoon? If Lindsey Graham is the best that South Carolina can do the rest of the nation should seriously reconsider South Carolina’s statehood.

Graham one of the Senators that I pronounced as a “ ex-Senator walking” because of his hand in helping destroy the Republican Party over illegal immigration also known as Comprehensive Immigration Reform was selected by South Carolina Republicans to go against the Democrat choice in November to represent South Carolinians.

Sen. Graham will face Democrat primary winner Bob Conley, 42, an engineer from North Myrtle Beach who is more of a Conservative than Lindsey Graham. Hell Hillary Clinton is more Conservative than Lindsey Graham. But Conley was once a registered Republican and South Carolina GOP official.

Graham on the other hand is a McCain Schwarzenegger Republican who holds no particular allege to Republican and/or Conservative ideas.

He praises liberals, but reserves particular venom for conservatives who disagree with him. The most infamous example came at a speech to the utterly radical Hispanic group La Raze -- it was bad enough that he spoke to them, much less what he said -- when he described what he would do to opponents of the awful immigration proposal he helped Ted Kennedy craft: "We're going to tell the bigots to shut up."

The idea that only a bigot could oppose the Kennedy amnesty plan was a recurring theme with Graham: On This Week, he told George Stephanopoulos that opponents were like those in earlier years who put up signs that said "No Catholics, no Jews, no Irish need apply."--Quin Hillyer

What a topsy-turvy South Carolina November election when the Democrat is the Conservative and the Republican is, well the Republican is "John McCain boot-licker" Lindsey Graham.

What is wrong with South Carolina Republicans? Lindsey Graham what a joke!

Homosexual Insurgents Assault California Voters Yet Again

What if you woke up tomorrow morning and you no longer had rights as an American citizen. What if someone or some group told you how to act and how to think. And what if you didn’t do as you where told and you were severely and harshly dealt with. Would that be America?

That is exactly what has happened in the state of California where the State Supreme Court of California struck down the People’s initiative proposition, 22 and replaced it with the opinions of four black robed individuals imposing their holier-than-thou will on 31.1 Million Californians.

California you are not in America anymore.– Alaphiah

The People in the majority in this country are under attack, but you knew that. Their traditions, their beliefs, and their way of life are being threatened by 3 to 4 percent of the Nation’s population and by that minuscule minority’s surrogates, supporters and attorneys.

This minority attacks the majority by using U.S. courts and laws as weapons of mass destruction, using the very institutions that were meant to uphold the traditions of our society against it and the majority’s lives, liberties and pursuit of happiness. This minority is waging this war against the majority in the same fashion that al Qaeda uses guerilla tactics and IED’s (roadside bombs) against U.S. troops in Iraq. But you knew that.

This minority uses their corrupt interpretation of law like al Qaeda uses their corrupt interpretation of Islam to wage jihad against all people who are not Muslims.

This minority uses Orwellian tainted words and ideas to confuse language and understanding so that their attacks on the majority have the appearance of benign civil rights causes and legislation, which confuses the ignorant and children, rather than appear to be the threats that they are, real devastating violent overturning societal changing events.

Just what I’m going on about? In an outrageous, unmatched and unbelievable act of arrogance and in-your-face disdain for the California voter, homosexual insurgents have once again declared a fatwa against California voter’s rights.

Lawyers for Equality California, a homosexual al Qaeda like front group, are attempting to block the new People’s marriage initiative, the Protection of Marriage Amendment, from the November 4 general election. This Initiative would add the definition of marriage that the people of California originally intended to be enforced by the People’s Supreme Court in proposition 22 sadly only to find that they must act by initiative once again to put the people’s will into the California Constitution itself.

It was the People of California’s will to protect the definition of marriage from such anticipated court attacks from invading homosexual hedonistic hordes and their attorneys.

That is why the people of California erected the great wall of proposition 22 in 1999 as protection from capricious and fanciful redefinitions of marriage, and as well to protect themselves from the tampering with of American and Western society that they anticipated would come and has come like the rising recent floods in Iowa and Mississippi river towns.

This tampering is not good change this tampering has weakened the family and has weakened American tradition the fundamental structures of American and of Western society.

Yet, homosexual insurgents convinced a majority on the high court of California with specious civil rights and politically correct arguments that had no basis in California Constitutional law to overturn and treat the people’s right to vote like so much flotsam based on these events.

Two years ago, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom thumbed his nose at California voters by illegally issuing marriage licenses to thousands of homosexual couples in open defiance of Proposition 22. Ultimately, the courts declared those so-called "marriages" to be invalid, but left the door open to a future constitutional challenge against traditional marriage.

• Additionally, the courts have undermined Proposition 22 and marriage by upholding an act of the Legislature that gave homosexual "domestic partners" the full legal status of married spouses. A San Francisco judge ruled that Proposition 22, a regular statute, violates the California was Constitution and ordered the licensing of same-sex "marriages." That decision is currently being appealed in the California Supreme Court.

• The Legislature twice passed legislation to allow licensing of homosexual "marriage." Both of these measures were vetoed by the governor.

• On May 15, 2008, the California Supreme Court found a "right" to homosexual marriage in the California Constitution and overturned Proposition 22..—ProtectMarriage.com

Chief Justice Ronald George writing for the majority acknowledged the fact that their ruling had no basis in the California Constitution for the Justice’s decision, yet in spite of that the Justices ruled in favor of homosexual al Qaeda on March 15, 2008 and homosexuals successfully ambushed voters using the California Supreme Court like an Iraqi roadside bomb to blow-up proposition 22 California’s definition of what the People say legalized marriage is in this state.

First, we must determine the nature and scope of the “right to marry” –a right that past cases establish as one of the fundamental constitutional rights embodied in the California Constitution. Although, as an historical matter, civil marriage and the rights associated with it traditionally have been afforded only to opposite-sex couples…”—Justice Ronald M. George

Noting in his written Judgment that historically civil marriage has always been understood in California Constitutional law to be between a man and a woman the court then reaches outside of the Constitution and the Court’s own rightful authority to invent an abomination to law, tradition and society, homosexual marriage.

Now with equally desperate arguments as used to justify the Courts ruling which deprived 31.1 million Californians of their vote. Equality California is again attempting to exclude the People of California from what could possibly be one of the most important votes in the history of this Country if not the history of the entire western civilization.

Equality California has petitioned a clearly prejudged California Supreme Court to prevent the Protection of Marriage Amendment, which was legally certified by California’s Secretary of State Debra Bowen for the November ballot which would add the definition of marriage to the California Constitution, from appearing on November’s California ballot.

California’s Supreme Court must recuse itself from hearing such a case that is the very least that a Court that has already involved itself in inappropriately legislating from the bench can do.

“I respect the Court’s decision and as Governor, I will uphold its ruling. Also, as I have said in the past, I will not support an amendment to the constitution that would overturn this state Supreme Court ruling.” --Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger

The People of California by now must realize that they are not only fighting California Courts and politicians, the Liberal Democrat controlled California Legislature and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, no Californians are also fighting against corporations that are funding this homosexual assault against our society, corporations which are only concerned with their revenue goals no matter that they are virtually destroying American culture to achieve them.

Everything that is wrong in America today can be blamed on an out-of-control corporate environment that will do anything and everything for the sake of the bottom line. Profit!—Alaphiah

The media is reporting this fiasco as if it is some sudden economic windfall for California.

Same-sex weddings could create hundreds of new jobs and pump hundreds of millions of dollars into California's economy, according to a new study released Monday.

Gay couples are projected to spend $684 million on flowers, cakes, hotels, photographers and other wedding services over the next three years - so long as voters don't put a halt to the same-sex marriage spree, according to a study by the Williams Institute at University of California, Los Angeles School of Law.

The study estimates that over the next three years, gay weddings will generate $64 million in additional tax revenue for the state, and another $9 million in marriage-license fees for counties. —The Associated Press reported by CBSNews.com

If California tax revenue is all that the government of California is concerned about then why not legalize prostitution, pornography and all forms of gambling, not just the California lottery. One could project at least a trillion dollars of tax and business revenue in these activities as well!

Homosexual insurgents and their supporters are hoping that they can create so much confusion in California law that their handiwork will be irreversible or they are hoping that the people of California can be totally excluded from the most important decision in California law by the implemented fascist ruling of the state Supreme Court, that established legal homosexuality and now they are attempting to protect that unconstitutional ruling by asking the Court involved in the middle of this controversy to again unfairly rule in their favor. (EQCA board of Directors)

Now once again and with equally desperate arguments as employed in their victory over proposition 22, Equality California is attempting to exclude the People of California from what could possibly be one of the most important votes in the history of this Country and the history of western civilization.

California’s Supreme Court is clearly prejudged in this matter and Creating Orwellian Worldview calls for them to recuse themselves immediately from hearing any case involving homosexuality, and the Court’s oxymoronic invention Homosexual Marriage!