Obama’s Darfur Solution to Russia

Sen. Obama in Hawaii

RUSSERT: He's 42 years old, he's a former law professor. He is Mr. Putin's campaign manager. He is going to be the new president of Russia. And if he says to the Russian troops, you know what, why don't you go help Serbia retake Kosovo, what does President Obama do?

OBAMA: Well, I think that we work with the international community that has also recognized Kosovo, and state that that's unacceptable. But, fortunately, we have a strong international structure anchored in NATO to deal with this issue. --The New York Times

Senator Obama wants to say that he told us so concerning Russia’s war on Georgia. Obama claims that he was been warning the world for months about Russian aggression however when asked directly in an hypothetical by the late Tim Russert in the Democrat primary debates held earlier this year what he would do if Russia helped Serbia to invade Kosovo Senator Obama gave the Darfur response.(see video)

As many as 200,000 to 400,000 innocent people have been killed and more than 2.5 million more have been driven from their homes. These refugees now face starvation, disease, and rape, while those who remain in Darfur risk torture, death, and displacement.

What has the United Nations done to stop the violence? What have the high profile Movie stars and peace activist done to stop the killing?

Let Darfur be a warning to all people. If a nation or a state needs protection against violence, murder, genocide or injustice do not wait on Liberals or their institutions to do anything to fight against the persecutors. Liberals will make a country like Darfur a cause celebre but they will not wage war to save you. They will not lift a actual finger to help.—Alaphiah

(see video)



What is the Darfur solution? What has the United Nations or any European country done to stop the 5years of murder and ethnic cleansing in Darfur? NOTHING! Oh they’ve condemned the violence, in fact they’ve passed three resolutions against the violence so after five years of the international body doing nothing for Sen. Obama to offer NATO as an answer against Russian aggression is laughably ignorant.

The 21 year Sudanese civil war between the Arab Muslim Khartoum government in the north and the black African Christian rebels in the south has spurred the world's greatest humanitarian crisis since the Rwandan genocide in 1994 and the World community is doing literally nothing about it. (see here)

1500 reported killed in the Russian Georgia Battle. Russia has bombed Georgia and has taken Georgian territory in blatant acts of war and aggression. Sen. Obama told Tim Russert that if he were President his answer to the situation would be to hide behind NATO yet he criticized the Bush administration’s handling Russian relations.


Can we expect any Liberal to actually respond to aggression in the world? If the U.N.'s response to Darfur and Sen. Obama response to the Russian attack against Georgia is any indication all we can expect from Liberals or a Democrat President is talk.

And frankly Sen. Obama there are some situations that we can’t just talk our way out of.

Back to the U.S.S.R.

From left: Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov, President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin (AP Photo/ RIA Novosti, Vladimir Rovionov, Presidemtial Press Service )

They’ve built Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Payment for that work and oil revenues on the global free market has not only made the middle east flush with wealth Russia is now regaining it’s status as a superpower and what better way to demonstrate their renewed oil generated power than by punishing the pro Western state of Georgia for all the world to take note.

Iran expects its first Russian-built nuclear power plant in the southern port city of Bushehr to come on stream in early 2009, reported Press TV.—Business Intelligence

The United States often credits President Ronald Regan for bringing down the Soviet Union by an escalation of military spending thus defeating the U.S.S.R. and ending the cold war between the Soviet Communist and America.

You think that the breakup of the Soviet Union, years of economic down turn and lose of world esteem might have been a little embarrassing for Russia?

Do you think that Russia regaining its economic strength would be good for America or the Western world?

The excuse for the Russian attack is South Ossetia, a breakaway province bordering Russia that Georgia claims as its own but whose heavily Russian-speaking population is supported by Moscow in its bid for independence.

But the more likely cause is Moscow's determination to demonstrate to Georgia and Ukraine, another pro-Western member of the old U.S.S.R., that the West, especially Washington, can't help them. And that membership in NATO is a no-no.—John Farmer, The Star-Ledger

Well considering that it is Russia and China that opposes the United States on the United Nations Security Council continually and it is Russia that is propping up Iran we could be right in the midst of Cold War II and not even aware of it.

How did the Georgian war begin? According to the Council on Foreign Relations Russia started it;

This “war”—and I think that is a more appropriate term than “conflict”—began in earnest at the end of last week when the Georgians responded to shelling from the Russian-controlled part of South Ossetia into their own portion of the province and maybe into Georgian territory proper. But this was only the spark that produced the big fire.

The confrontation has been building for several months, and one might even say for several years. The big increase in tension came in April when the Russians announced that they would upgrade their relations with the two breakaway provinces of Georgia—Abkhazia and South Ossetia. They followed that by increasing the troop contingent that they had in those provinces, essentially a peacekeeping force.

They increased military pressure, shooting down Georgian drones and sending Russian aircraft over Georgian territory. The expectation of many observers was that they were looking to exert a kind of pressure that would cause the Georgians to respond in some way that would then make it possible for Russian forces to come in and strike.-- Stephen Sestanovich, CFR senior fellow for Russian and Eurasian studies (see here)

Georgian Deputy Prime Minister Giorgi Baramidze believes that Russia started this war too: (See Video about 6 mins)



Whether it’s Cold War or Oil Wars Russia has halted its military action in Georgia for now with a message to the world.

Economy strength is back in Russia and boy how lucky we are.

There’s No Such Thing as “Moderate Islam”!

I had my doubts about the muslim religion, so I tried to
educate myself. What I found out is not only chilling,
but damning of both the so-called “religion”, and it’s
maniacal founder, Muhammad!

I could probably fill dozens of pages, but it just seems
easier and more accurate to give you a website that will
truly open the eyes of not only the “tolerant” but the
“forgiving”.

Don’t believe the spin you hear from the muslim apologists,
that Islam is a “peaceful religion”. In actuality, it
preaches death to all who are not devout muslims, no
exceptions!!!! It not only condones, but actually encourages terrorism and the murder of wives, sisters and daughters, for
the simplist “infractions” of tyrannical and archaic “muslim
Law”..... presently called "honor killings".

This is a bunch of BS, and cannot and will not be tolerated
in the United States. For your sake, and the sake of your
children, grandchildren and their descendants, educate
yourself before it is too late. There is nothing in this
false religion that preaches love...........only hate, death
and destruction. This is Islam’s big bone of contention with
Christians and Jews....... who’s religions are built on love.

In the words of Islam’s founder:........‘They say we are terrorists? They are right—of course we are. That is what we
do for a living’ — Khalid Shaikh Muhammad

Read this and weep!!!
http://www.islamundressed.com/B-Diary%20of%20Muhammad.htm

The Messiah is an Empty Suit

Or the Messiah has no Clothes

“America is …, uh, is no longer, uh … what it could be, what it once was. And I say to myself, I don’t want that future for my children.”—Democrat presumptive nominee Sen. Barack Obama

Not since the little boy in Hans Christian Anderson’s fairly tale, “The Emperor has no Clothes” has a child brought about such enlightenment for the village.

We of this village, the village of the United States of America can now see what asking the right question can do to open unsuspecting eyes to the truth.

That is just what a 7 year old little girl in Elkhart Indiana did last week when she asked a question of Sen. Barack Obama on Obama's campaign stump. This little girl’s question exposed Sen. Obama for the empty suit that he is. I’m even now more resolute in knowing that Sen. Clinton had it wrong. On the contrary Sen. Clinton it takes a child to raise a village particularly if the village is given over to false worship.

In Anderson’s fairy tale two huckster tailors come to the village with sophistic tales of invisible looms and golden thread all to make an invisible suit for the Emperor to wear.

As the story goes anyone who did not see the visible cloth that the golden thread produced or the suit that they tailored from the invisible cloth were too stupid to live in the village and certainly too stupid to advise the Emperor, so everyone in the village pretended to see the pretend invisible suit.

These two peddlers would have gotten clean away with their farce too had it not been for a little boy that cut through all the pretence and said what he saw. “THE EMPEROR HAS ON NO CLOTHES” The little boy shouted when the Emperor paraded down the middle of the village with his ignorance showing adored in nothing but underwear and lies.

The whole village and even the Emperor himself had allowed highfalutin words to dazzle them into a group psychosis making the whole village susceptible to the wiles of the two predatory conmen.

In like fashion, Sens. Clinton’s and Obama’s campaigns to be the Democrat nominee for President of the United States of America has paralleled Anderson’s fairly tale. Both campaigns where filled complete with sophistry and highfalutin words of a failed America woven into an anti-American tapestry like so much invisible cloth.

So naturally their candidacies begged the question why do you what to be President?

But only a 7-year-old little girl was smart enough to ask it. When this question, elegant for its simplicity, was asked of the presumptive Democrat nominee, Sen. Barack Obama, Obama sputtered out perhaps the most appallingly revealing answer he said, “America is …, uh, is no longer, uh … what it could be, what it once was. And I say to myself, I don’t want that future for my children.”

Doesn’t make any sense does it? But oh contraire it does!

Sen. Obama the Democrat Party and the Senator’s wife have been weaving this dark dank picture of America for going on 7 years now. America the war monger, America the immigrant hater, America the homophobic, America the Global polluter, America the racist, America the sexist, America the greedy, America the imperialist, America the vast right-wing conspirator, etc.

When Sen. Obama, Democrats or Sen. Clinton, for that matter look at America they see the worst of what America has been and even the worst of some things that we have not been.

That is their reality or they could not possible say the things that they say about America. What is so breathe takingly ironic is that Sen. Obama for all intents and purposes will be the first openly Black man to be voted as nominee of a major American political Party a historic feat and tribute to the change that America has undergone.

Yet the Senator has looked right passed this historical time in American history to complain about an unjust America, a figment of his own deluded hatred for this Country.

How could the first openly Black presumptive nominee of a major political Party in the United States of America miss the gravity and the historic important of this time, his time, the time that he, his wife and his followers have been waiting for?

How could Sen. Obama tell a 7-year-old little girl that he’s running for President basically because America sucks and he doesn’t want that for his children?

I think twenty years of sitting in Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s Church of Black Liberation Theology combined with the normal ideology of Democrat’s hate America first is woven right into the very fabric of who Barack Hussein Obama is.

He could not have answered that 7-year-old’s question any other way. For Sen. Obama to look past all of the progress that America has made, progress that is responsible for his political rise and success is indicative of the self deluded blindness and emptiness of his political views.

For Sen. Obama politically, there is no balm in Gilead, there is no rose of Sharon. And as for he who would presume to speak to the people of the world as he did in Germany, a 7-year-old little girl has revealed to that world that the Messiah has no clothes.

The Fraud that Al Gore took the initiative to create

Former Vice President, Nobel Peace Prize winner and Oscar winner Albert A. Gore,Jr.

PERSONAL ENERGY ETHICS PLEDGE

As a believer:
-that human-caused global warming is a moral, ethical, and spiritual issue affecting our survival;
-that home energy use is a key component of overall energy use;
-that reducing my fossil fuel-based home energy usage will lead to lower greenhouse gas emissions; and
-that leaders on moral issues should lead by example;
I pledge to consume no more energy for use in my residence than the average American household by March 21, 2008.”

Al Gore won’t sign it. Sen. Jim Inhofe has asked anyone who advocates going green to sign a personal pledge that they wouldn’t consume more energy than the average American household.

Movie and Rock Stars, Actors and Actresses, anyone of fame and fortune that has told us to turndown the heat, raise the thermostat or over inflate our tires please sign a pledge that you madam and you sir will do the same.

Any takers? 506 days and Al Gore won’t sign. Why because he uses what has been reported as up to 20 times more energy in this residence than the average American household.

Gore has been criticized for excessive home energy usage at his residence in Tennessee. His electricity usage is reportedly 20 times higher than the average American household.—U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works

So mister "Global warming" is doing his part to ensure that we all die from anthropogenic global warming but he’s doing nothing to end his exorbitant use of energy.

What Mr. Gore plans to do is pay for the privilege of polluting by buy carbon offset credits. Now that wouldn’t make the air any cleaner in fact Gore’s offset credits won’t do anything for the environment at all. But he buys the privilege to say that he’s doing his part.

Sen. Jim Inhofe makes this all too apparent in this Senate hearing concerning Global warming. Remember Gore is supposed to be answering a, "Yes, No" question. (See video)



Personal hypocrisies aside there is just isn’t a man-made catastrophe Global melt down about to happen in fact every global warming commercial that you see should be taken off the air and the sponsors should be sued for mental cruelty and causing public panic.

And those carbon credits that Al Gore is hawking, The Financial Times of London says that is all a fraud. But you knew that didn’t you? (See story)and (here)

A recent investigation by the Financial Times found widespread profiteering and fraud in carbon trading, the main mechanism for greenhouse gas reduction proposed by the Kyoto treaty. Many schemes will produce only limited reductions in greenhouse gases and will have little or no effect on global warming.--Harry Nielsen

Going Green, oh that only means taking your green. So companies that are so positioned to do so will take your money for absolutely no services in return.

Senator Inhofe does every American a service by exposing the whole Global warming/Go Green movement as the fraud that it is. (See video)



The inconvenient truth is the Earth is getting colder not hotter and CO2 can not scientifically be linked to Global warming or climate change. (and here)

Pelosi says use your imagination to get gas and oil

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi

STEPHANOPOULOS: But why not allow votes on all that? When you came in as Speaker you promised in your commitment book "A New Direction for America," let me show our viewers, you said that “Bills should generally come to the floor under a procedure that allows open, full, fair debate consisting of full amendment process that grants the Minority the right to offer its alternatives.” If they want to offer a drilling proposal, why can't they have a vote?

PELOSI: They'll have to use their imagination as to how they can get a vote and then they may get a vote. –NewsBusters, transcript of Interview on “this week”

One question very simply posed by former Clinton White house aide and now “This week” news show host George Stephanopoulos to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi last Sunday on "this week."

If Mr. Stephanopoulos ask this question once he asked it a million times, Speaker Pelosi if you are right why don’t you allow a straight up or down vote in Congress on drilling oil as the American people want.

Mr. Stephanopoulos even showed the Speaker of the House her own words where she said that under her leadership the House would be run ethically and fairer than under Republican control prior to 2006.

A New Direct for America

Regular order for legislation

Bills should generally come to the floor under a procedure that allows open, full and fair debate consisting of a full amendment process that grants the Minority the right to offer its alternatives, including a substitute.--Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (See document)(See video about 8mins)

Clearly if the Congresswoman’s position was correct surely that would be born out by a Democrat majority House of Representatives would show the American people’s interest.

So why won’t the Speaker of the House allow a vote on whether America should be able to drill for oil in America to decrease American dependency on foreign oil?

Congresswoman Pelosi’s answers were insultingly stupefying and opaquely serpentine even for a Democrat. And like a political Fairy Godmother she pronounced, "They'll have to use their imagination as to how they can get a vote and then they may get a vote."

Then continuing in typically Democrat fare the Congresswoman blamed President Bush as the reason that she did not allow a vote for drilling for oil. Ridiculous! (See video about 7mins)



It is a further insult to the American people’s intelligence that 7 years of Democrats attempts to sabotage the Bush administration and Republicans at the risk of losing the Iraq war thereby making the world less safe could be understood in any way that what Democrats were really attempting to accomplish was to save the planet and make the world safer.

Congresswoman Pelosi and the Democrat majority should be ashamed of themselves and they should rush back to Congress and do their jobs like the Republicans who are fighting for the American people.

Something to think about in November I must say!

Yet More Deception from Pelosi!

The 'Politico' reports that Nancy Pelosi is
secretly advising Democratic Congressmen, who
are coming up for re-election, to "support"
off-shore drilling, if it will get them elected.

I guess she figures if she can keep the Democratic
majority in both houses of Congress, they will be
free to continue doing exactly as they please and
"screw you"!

NICE Nancy!!!!!!!............. lie to the people
again. You got some sweetheart deal there. Tell
the people what they want to hear, and slam it to
them later........... as you did with Election '06.

Anybody who votes these lying, good-for-nothing
maggots back into office this year, is a fool at
best. It's as though you are telling them that
"it hurts".......... but, "do it again, I like it"!

It depends on what ready is

President Bill Clinton

Bill Clinton regrets some things he said - and didn't say - on the campaign trail. But one thing he still can't bring himself to utter: Barack Obama is ready to be President.-- MICHAEL McAULIFF, DAILY NEWS

"You can argue that nobody is ready to be president. You can argue that even if you've been vice-president for eight years, that no one can be fully ready for the pressures of the office." —Former President William Jefferson Clinton

When asked point blank just days ago whether or not Democrat presumptive nominee and Senator Barack Obama was ready to be the President of the United States of America, former President Bill Clinton answered in his own erstwhile yet indomitable, that depends on what is, is, fashion. (see story) (Play video)



The former President said, “You can argue that nobody is ready to be president.” The former President when on to say that he felt that Obama would beat McCain.

So let me see if I understand this, the Democrat Party is willing to put forward candidates (Hillary Clinton included) who are not ready to be President thinking number one that the American people are stupid enough to elect them (which was disproved in the Democrat primary) and number two Democrats don’t have to believe in the credentials of their candidates they only want to win.

Yesterday was the third day that House Republicans called the nation’s attention to the fact that Democrats in control of Congress have been a political disaster and that Nancy Pelosi and her Democrat Majority would rather be vacationing rather than voting on a resolution for the oil crisis in America. (See story)

And now Bill Clinton can’t quite bring himself to answer a simple yes or no question about the quality and readiness of the candidate that the Democrats have all but chosen to be their nominee to be President.

I guess you can argue that no Democrat should be elected to office locally or nationally but I guess that doesn’t matter because apparently what matters to Democrats is only that they win no matter what they promise. Like in the 2006 elections when they promised a new direction and all we got was partisan warfare from Democrat which caused legislative gridlock and more of the same politics.

Now they have put forward a candidate that promises new hope and change, the only thing is he’s not qualified to produce either!

Not one honest Democrat, if you can find such a thing, is willing to say that Sen. Barack Obama is ready to be President of the United States of America. But you can find plenty who says that he’s not. (play video)



If the Democrat’s greatest icon of the twentieth century William Jefferson Clinton can’t bring himself to say that Senator Obama is ready to be President why do Democrats think that they have any chance with Independents and Republicans? And they need crossover from both to win this election.

Only the rabid ultra partisans who value Party over country will vote for Barack. Only the ignorant who are enthralled with the idea of , “The first Black President” will vote for Barack. Only the enemies of America who want change, they want to see America changed and unmoored from the traditions that once made this country uniquely great, will vote for Barack.

Will Bill Clinton vote for Barack Obama?

Yes, because Bill Clinton is all of the above. In President Clinton’s own words, “The Constitution sets qualifications for the president, and then the people decide who they think would be the better president. I think we have two choices. I think he [Obama] should win, and I think he will win.”

That classic Clinton nondirect response was to the question, “Do you think that he[Sen. Obama] is qualified?” Not exactly a ringing endorsement of the man who potentially could lead your country but it’ll have to do because to anyone on knows how to interpret Clintonese the President’s answer was NO! No, Barack Hussein Obama is not ready and he is not qualified but Democrats have to win.

That my friend was Clinton’s true response layered underneath all of his pretense.

Depending of course on what is, is!

Pelosi’s on Vacation: Republicans working for the People

Leader of the Democrat controlled House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi

While their colleagues returned home for vacation, a small group of conservative Republicans took to the House floor Monday to protest Speaker Nancy Pelosi's refusal to hold a vote on offshore oil drilling.-- JOHN RILEY / The Dallas Morning News (See story)

Its lights out in the U.S. House of Representatives because the Democrat lead Congress is on a 5 week vacation.

However not everyone has gone home. There are some who feel a sense of duty to the American people. These few would be Republicans who knowing the dire need to relieve the American People at the gas pump have decided to stay and fight on behalf of the American people.

With no C-Span cameras to record the Republican protest against Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s shut down, House Republicans have resorted to hall way interviews to bring attention to the fact that the Democrat leadership in Congress left Washington D.C. leaving the people’s business undone. (see video about 8mins)



Republicans have vowed to keep their protest up on behalf of the American people until Democrats return to Congress and complete the unfinished work that their job requires.

The more things change the more they remain the same

Democrats making a stink that Iraqi government took vacation in 2007

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and the Democrats adjourned the House and turned off the light and killed the microphones, but Republicans are still on the floor talking gas prices.

Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) and other GOP leaders opposed the motion to adjourn the House, arguing that Pelosi's refusal to schedule a vote allowing offshore drilling is hurting the American economy.

They have refused to leave the floor after the adjournment motion passed at 11:23 a.m. and are busy bashing Pelosi and her fellow Democrats for leaving town for the August recess.—CBS News as reported by The Politico 2008(See here)

Lawmakers divided over whether to keep U.S. troops in Iraq are finding common ground on at least one topic: They are furious that Iraqi politicians are considering a lengthy break this summer.—Associated Press 2007

May 3, 2007 Democrats blasted the Bush Administration and the Iraqi parliament because the Iraqi parliament voted to take a summer break even as U.S. troops fought in the desert heat in Iraq.(See here)

Democrats said that while American soldiers were suffering in the desert heat fighting for freedom in Iraq it was unacceptable for the Iraqi parliament to vacation.

However, how quickly events can change in a year’s time. Sectarian violence is down in Iraq and Shia government and Sunni militia are joining U.S. efforts in defeating insurgent al Qaeda in Iraq. In addition to those things, the U.S. led surge is working and has brought defeat to al Qaeda and stability to the region even if the presumptive Democrat nominee can not admit it!

Now amid record gas prices and Americans facing economic hardships our Congress has voted to go on vacation leaving an all important vote to drill for oil abandoned by this historically low single digit voter approval rated Democrat led, “Do nothing Congress.”



Ironically it was Republicans who attempted to force the Congressional Democrats to do the right thing and vote for the people’s interests but instead Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi turned off the lights, C-Span cameras, adjourned and left the Republicans in the dark to vainly fight for the rights of the people. (See here)

Apparently this is the change that the Democrats promised the American people. In one years time Democrats criticized the Iraqi parliament for taking a vacation while America soldiers suffered, only to turn around in a year’s time and do absolutely nothing to fulfill 2006 campaign promises to change America and work for the people.

Instead on some of the most important issues of the day, energy and oil prices, Democrats adjourn to leave the American people suffering in spite of the fact that Democrats could have remained and fought for the people as a few Republicans attempted to do.

The more things change the more they remain the same. Apparently America that’s the only change that you can believe in coming from a Democrat!

The Dems Trip Out (UP)!

Well, my friends. It's time to thank all those who
voted the "do-nothing" Democrats into control of
Congress in '06. I would like to say that you got
what you deserve, but unfortunately, it affects the
rest of us too!

Whatever made you think, with their past miserable
record, that any of those pie-in-the-sky promises that
they made to you prior to the 2006 elections, would ever
be kept. They did their best to smear the Republicans,
and then they come into power and thumb their noses at
all of us.

Now........... to add insult to injury, they leave on
vacation (5 weeks yet), and tell us all to buzz off.
Of course, they don't have to worry about the cost of
gasoline or any other costs, since they are pretty well
taken care of, BY US, with great salaries, awesome health
benefits (the best that our money can buy), very generous
penisons (even better than Wall Street), and all the graft
they can take!

I am more than pissed at these gross animals. They lie
through their teeth, and turn out to be 100 TIMES WORSE
than the representatives we had before election day '06.
They NEVER represent us the way we want them to, as
demostrated very strongly by their refusal to even vote
on lifting the offshore drilling ban. It's as though
they are telling us, "you put us in control, so shut the
hell up!".

If they think that "more air in your car's tires, conservation,
wind power, solar power, and biofuels......... are going
to cure this country's energy problems....... they are far
more naive than I ever gave them credit for.

ALL those ideas are light years away from being practical,
and even making a dent in our problems. They claim that
lifting the offshore drilling ban will not help bring down
the cost of oil for about ten years. But experts in the
field say that if we tap where we KNOW there is oil, we can
start benefiting in as little as ONE year. Who knows
better.......the oil wildcats or the Congress. I will grant
that the Congress has the edge on wind power, but that is all.

Fellow voters......... REMEMBER THIS TRECHERY come election
day........ and throw the bums out. Keep throwing them out
unless they vote the way we want them too. They are supposed
to be OUR representatives, not the lobbies that throw millions
into their re-election campaigns.

You can check their voting records online. Go, and anybody
who isn't in your corner, VOTE AGAINST. Start with Menendez
in New Jersey.......... for trying to destroy the Immigration
Bill........... he hasn't listened to ONE WORD from any of us.

Obama Launches Preemptive Racist Strike

Sens. McCain and Obama: Not campaigning in perfect Harmony

Launching a Preemptive Racist Strike against Republicans the presumptuous presumptive Democrat nominee Barack Hussein Obama attempted to scare his audience with a tale of Republican racism by using racism of his own to do it! (See here)

Obama said, "[…] So what they're going to try to do is make you scared of me, You know, he's not patriotic enough, he's got a funny name, you know, he doesn't look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills."

That’s an outlandish political charge. The last I checked Sen. McCain has affirmed to wage a respectful campaign to the chagrin of may Republicans. (See here)

This is not the first time Sen. Obama has invoked this racist dialogue into the campaign. He originally projected racism onto Republicans June 2008 And in his Berlin speech before 200,000 people of Germany the Senator began by saying, “I know that I don’t look like the Americans who’ve previously spoken in this great city.

The journey that led me here is improbable. My mother was born in the heartland of America , but my father grew up herding goats in Kenya . His father – my grandfather – was a cook, a domestic servant to the British. “ (Speech Transcript)

It seems to me that Sen. Obama has racism on his mind and that he is attempting to project onto the Republicans his own inadequacies.

After all Sen. Obama did attend the Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s Black Liberation Theology Church for many, many years and raised his family in that anti-White atmosphere where anti-White and anti-American messages were normally spoken. (See related Fox news discussion below)




In addition to that how ironic that Sen. Obama’s own Party, the Democrat Party used race against him when Sen. Hillary Clinton her husband and surrogates all attempted to defeat Obama by scaring Democrats regarding Sen. Obama’s race in their Democrat primaries. (See here)and (here)

Using sex, race against each other

At the same time, each has used the issue against the other. Mr. Obama’s advisers suggested that Mrs. Clinton was playing the sex card last fall after a brutal debate where several male contenders criticized her.

Mrs. Clinton’s advisers and former President Bill Clinton suggested that black candidates like Mr. Obama had done well in South Carolina because of support among African-Americans there.

For Sen. Obama to continually attempt to invoke Racism where it isn’t is a slap in the face of every American. First look to your own Party Sen. Obama. People of the world look at the Democrat Party they are the new purveyors of Racism and they are using a Black candidate to promote it.

Sen. Obama it is time that you face the reality that you and your Party are the only ones stuck on Race and when you lose in November as Sen. Clinton said you will, (She told Gov. Bill Richards that you can’t win) it will not be because you are an inadequate Black male as Senator Clinton supporter Harriet Christian says.

No instead, you will lose because you are an inadequate Democrat candidate. One in a long line of inadequate Democrats who have attempted to became President of the United States of America but have failed.

You can’t blame Republicans for your inadequacies, neither should you attempt self-filing racist prophesies.

The only racism evident so far is not coming from John McCain, or the Republicans. The only racism thus far has emanated from you Senator Obama and the Democrat Party.

Following is Keith Olbermann’s commentary on the Democrat Party’s overt Racism following years of Geraldine Ferraro's racist comments. It seems to me Sen. Obama Democrats are the racist, yourself included.

The Candidate Formerly Known As Senator Barack Hussein Obama

The Symbol of the Artist Formerly Known as Prince who is now again Known as Prince

"I have become a symbol of the possibility of America returning to our best traditions" –Barack Obama

Just back from his European “I’m already the President of the United States” Tour, the Democratic candidate Senator Barack Hussein Obama announced in a closed door meeting of Democrats Tuesday that he has, “become a symbol of the possibility of America returning to our best traditions,” the candidate spoke this apparently still basking in the afterglow of his European Presidential pre-victory lap. (See story)

So in honor of President Obama’s announcement I shall refer to the great one as simply “Symbol” or “the candidate formerly known as Barack Hussein Obama” (TCFKABHO).

Not since John Lennon announced that the Beatles were more popular than Jesus Christ has a World personality felt more important.

And he should, It’s not every day that one has the ability to speak to the people of the world all at the same time as “Symbol” did last Thursday in Germany where he called for the world to come together as one under his 8 to 10 year term as President.

"the objective of this trip was to have substantive discussions with people like President Karzai or Prime Minister Maliki or President Sarkozy or others who I expect to be dealing with over the next eight to 10 years.—Symbol, the candidate formerly known as Barack Hussein Obama (See here)

Below is Symbol with his new symbol . Might look nice with a new and improved White house painted Black as Symbol’s favorite rapper Ludacris suggests in his new Obama rap.


“paint the White House black and I’m sure that’s got ‘em terrified”—Ludacris, from the new Obama rap, “Obama is Here” (See video below)



Yo America! Symbol is here and you know that! (Eat your heart out Obama girl!)

57 and One Left to Go

Sen. Barack Obama: Is he a stealth Socialist?

It is wonderful to be back in Oregon . Over the last 15 months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States . I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go. Alaska and Hawaii , I was not allowed to go to even though I really wanted to visit, but my staff would not justify it."—Democrat presumptive Nominee for President of the United States of America Barack Obama

Nothing else captures the essence of Barack Obama, I think, better than his remark on the campaign trail in Oregon a few months back where the junior Senator from the land of Lincoln added seven to eight states to the United States of America. Now that’s real change!

Whether you consider what the senator said a mistake or a gaffe the more important question is how does a person with degrees from Columbia and Harvard Law School, and who is campaigning to become President of the United States not know something as fundamental as there are 50 states in the United States of America?

He’s a U.S. Senator for gosh sakes, is there not a handbook that they give out to new Senators that explains that each state has two senators which represents them and that there are a total of 100 senators?

Senator Obama’s apparent and stunning ignorance of the workings of his own country notwithstanding the Senator shows an equally startling revisionist attitude considering world history as displayed in his speech in Berlin last Thursday according to author and talk show host Dennis Prager as Mr. Prager’s, appraisal of “Obama’s naïve Berlin Speech” indicates. (See here)

To better understand Sen. Barack Obama, his speech before 200,000 Germans in Berlin is one good place to start. As we shall see, however, it does not leave one secure as to the senator's understanding of history, of America's role in the world, and what to do about evil, among other important issues.—Dennis Prager

Opinion Editorialist William Kristol’s “The Mask Slips” critiques Sen. Obama’s Marxist roots by education and association. (See here) Which makes one speculate whether going to Germany was more of an ideological home coming for Sen. Obama rather than the innocent but politically symbolic historic photo op that mass media reported the trip to be.

My occasion for spending a little time once again with the [book written by] old Communist [Karl Marx] was Barack Obama’s now-famous comment at an April 6 San Francisco fund-raiser. Obama was explaining his trouble winning over small-town, working-class voters: “It’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”—William Kristol

Finally Investor’s Business Daily warns America that Sen. Obama is a stealth Socialist who is attempting to beguile America with euphemisms and codified language to cloak the real intent of his agenda, which is to fundamentally change America’s social economic structure to that of Socialism. (See here)

[Sen. Obama’s phase]"Economic justice" simply means punishing the successful and redistributing their wealth by government fiat. It's a euphemism for socialism.—Investor’s Business Daily

Sen. Obama’s plan seems to be targeting people like him, who believe that America has 57 states and One to go…Hum that would be Liberals in the Democrat Party and their far left moveon.org netroots counterparts.

Obama’s plan to focus on those who are ignorant regarding American and World history seems to be working. Thank God we aren’t all Liberals!

Socialist of the World This is Your Moment

Barack Obama waves to the crowd after speaking in Berlin on Thursday.
" The walls between old allies on either side of the Atlantic cannot stand. The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes; natives and immigrants; Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down."—Sen. Barack Hussein Obama

Socialism
1. Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.
2. The stage in Marxist-Leninist theory intermediate between capitalism and communism, in which collective ownership of the economy under the dictatorship of the proletariat has not yet been successfully achieved.Dictionary.com

Now that we’ve all had time to digest what we saw in the last couple of days on President Obama’s world tour and now that Sen. Obama is safely back home convening his economic team like he really were the President he pretended to be in the Middle East and Europe I think this is a good time to analyze what we saw last Thursday in front of the Victory Column (Siegessaeule) in Berlin, Germany.

What we saw was not a speech in the American tradition of John F. Kennedy or Ronald Reagan even though the symbolism was meant to suggest to your mind that it was. No what we saw standing in front of the German people and calling out to the People of the world was more in line with Karl Marx and Vladimir Illich Ulyanov or Vladimir Lenin as you’ve heard of him.

Like a long lost wayward child the American leftist socialist movement lead by the Democrat presumptive nominee Sen. Barack Obama was accepted back home and embraced in its mother’s arms.

The acceptance that the Democrat’s presumptive nominee received in Europe therefore was symbolically the American socialist movement, in it’s present form the Democrat Party, connecting with its mother movement, the socialists movement of Europe ergo Sen. Obama’s, “People of the world.” The circle has been complete.

The struggle between the ideologies, the American socio-economic model and the European socialist model is obviously over and the European socialist model has won.

Sen. Obama’s call to his fellow socialists worldwide was a call which we will soon see manifested in America and after that happens, if Sen. Obama is elected to be President of the United States, we shall became the United Socialist States of America in a World governed by World socialist of Europe delivered into their hands of course by the American Socialist Barack Hussein Obama and the Democrat Party.

As Sen. Obama said, “People of the world look at Berlin,” because that is exactly where we are headed if Barack Obama is elected President.

You did want change didn’t you? This change will supersede the United States Constitution with the more progressive United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (See here) That’s only because American laws and America’s justice system are so passé now days, wouldn’t you say? All of the progressive justices know that European law is better than American law just ask Justice Anthony Kennedy and Justice Stephen Breyer

America will become just another socialist state of the world in addition to that her people will be asked to pay for all of the ills of the world, global warming and of course Sen. Obama’s Global Poverty Act.

That act could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States that’s American taxpayers’ money to fund the Senator’s world socialist dreams that is why I call this hard move to the left a socialist movement and if Barack Obama is elected I fear this will only be the beginning.

[The]bill called the "Global Poverty Act," sponsored by Democratic Senator Barack Obama, was quickly passed by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday and could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States… the major media's cover-up of the bill, which makes levels of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations, demonstrates the media's desire to see Senator Obama elected to the presidency. –Accuracy in Media

Obama is popular in Europe because he represents the leftist socialist movement that Europeans have embraced for decades and they are only too happy to see the United States has finally acquiesced to it.

Have we? Only you can decide that.

Obama Slaps America in the Face Amid World Tour

Sen. Obama in front of Number 10 Downing Street

Katie Couric revealed an Obama slap in America’s face, it’s hard to believe but she has! Of all people who would have guessed that Couric would uncover a greater controversy than the Rev. Jeremiah Wright controversy right in the middle of the Obama, “I’m the inevitable President of the United States” world tour? (See video)




Sitting down with Sen. Obama in Ammon, Jordan just after he had visited Iraq and Afghanistan Couric could not get Sen. Obama to admit that the surge was primarily responsible and that the surge was the catalyst for political and military improvements in Iraq or that it was America’s victories in Iraq which made his world tour possible.

Obama instead attempted to credit only the Iraqi efforts; the Sunni fight against al Qaeda and the Shia government’s fight against al Qaeda, however, both would not have been possible without America’s resolve to stay in Iraq when Democrats, Sen. Obama included, insisted that America should leave Iraq or cut and run because the Iraq war could not be won and was in fact already lost.

In contrast Couric’s interview with Sen. McCain set a different tone on the success in Iraq. Sen. McCain on the other hand credits the American effort for the success that we presently see in Iraq.

Ms. Couric also showed statistics that bear out the fact that it was indeed the America surge that was primarily responsible for the turn around in Iraq.

Why couldn’t Sen. Obama just be honest and admit to Ms. Couric what she, and what we, already know?

Because Sen. Obama is tied to a radical leftist agenda which prevents acknowledging the truth and if that truth is positive and if that truth credits America or Republicans Sen. Obama nor any other partisan Democrat will acknowledge America’s or Republican success.

In fact Sen. Obama feels more comfortable speaking before the world as he did in Germany and fault America for past deed that Socialist throughout the world object to, even if those deeds lead to freedom and prosperity for the world.

To see just how reticent and resistance to speaking the truth Sen. Obama is I’ve posted the full interview with Katie Couric. You can see for yourself the Democrat tactic of only speak negative about Republicans, President Bush and the war in Iraq as employed by Sen. Obama and by doing so Sen. Obama’s unintentional slight of America in general.

Nevertheless, it is a slight and a startling revelation of the hyper-partisanship of Democrats and proof that Sen. Obama is the same old divisive politician that Democrats have tended to set forth in the last two Presidential elections. (See video about 23mins)

Can a Citizen of the World lead America?

U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama waves to the crowd after making a speech in front of the Victory Column (Siegessaeule) in Berlin July 24, 2008.

"Tonight, I speak to you not as a candidate for President, but as a citizen -- a proud citizen of the United States, and a fellow citizen of the world."—Senator and Democrat presumptive nominee Barack Hussein Obama

Sen. Barack Obama has not yet secured his Party’s nomination. Sen. Obama has not been elected President of the United States of America. Yet Sen. Obama stood in front of the Victory Column (Siegessaeule) in Berlin and lectured 200,000 German people and called out to the people of the world for all existing divisive walls of the world to be torn down. I think the Senator presumes too much!

"The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes, natives and immigrants, Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand,"—Sen. Barack Hussein Obama

What is so preposterous and hypocritical about a Democrat making such a plea is it was Democrats who have build the walls of partisan separation in this country. A Democrat has no business lecturing the world about tearing down walls that divide, if it were not for Al Gore and the 2000 elections and subsequently the likes of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Charles Schemer, Hillary Clinton, and Howard Dean American would not be stuck in the quagmire of a Red State Blue State divide.

Sen. Obama’s words were words coming from an ultra-Partisan that only beat out a super Partisan Sen. Hillary Clinton because the radical left wing netroots of George Soros and Moveon.org boosted his candidacy to a multimillion dollar campaign victory. This is the same radical far left wing arm of the Democrat Party which wishes to help Sen. Obama secure the Presidency now.

Sen. Obama’s Party is guilty of building walls of partisanship and separation in this country. For almost 8 years Sen. Obama’s Party undermined and demonized the leader of the Free world. So much so that leaders of oppressive theocratic and socialist nations felt welcome to come to the United Nations in New York and denounce our President before the world.

If the world hates America and America’s president it is because Democrats introduced and unleashed the venom of political hatred into the political mainstream of world politics. For Sen. Obama to call on the world to tear down walls epitomizes the sheer two-facedness of the Democrat party.

Sen. Obama’s hypocrisy notwithstanding the question that begs an answer is as a citizen of the world would Sen. Obama’s total allegiance be to the United States of America or would he feel that he is subject to the United Nations’ World Court at The Hague?

For that matter would a President Obama felt that he has two governing principles, the U.S. Constitution and the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to be equally followed?

Would a President Obama allow the World Court to try a U.S. citizen for any reason?

Would a President Obama, and citizen of the world, govern by superceding the U.S. constitution with International law if he felt that it was appropriate to do so?

I don’t know maybe I’m old-fashioned but I think that one should first be President of the United States of America before one goes around the world acting like it and lecturing the world. (Transcript of speech)

People of Berlin - and people of the world - the scale of our challenge is great. The road ahead will be long. But I come before you to say that we are heirs to a struggle for freedom. We are a people of improbable hope. Let us build on our common history, and seize our common destiny, and once again engage in that noble struggle to bring justice and peace to our world.—Barack Hussein Obama

Also, before you call on the people of the world Sen. Obama maybe you should be elected President of the World or some such magnanimous title befitting of someone of your vision to speak to the world’s masses.

I’m thinking that Americans would settle for someone who is an American first, last and always. America now faces challenges that will require the full attention and allegiance of its elected leader someone who will protect American from all enemies both foreign and domestic if that is not your vision as to what an American President is Sen. Obama then maybe you should run for President of the world.

Right now in America it is not the time for blurred citizenship we need a leader who can tell the difference between an American citizen and someone who uses the American citizens. We need a President who will protect America from those who have no allegiance to this great country and its traditions but continue to take her resources and wealth.

America is in serious need of a President, a citizen of America and in your speech before the German people and the world Sen. Obama you told America that, that person is not you! (see entire speech)about 20mins.

Global warming has made us stupid!

Dr. David Evans
I was in a meeting the other day (true story) and the presenter shot this Global warming round off on us a captive audience of about fifty people. She said, “Whether you believe in Global warming or not the climate is changing!”

I don’t know much else of what she said after that because my mind went into overdrive picking apart the logical fallacies of her little sneak assault on the reasoning capabilities of everyone in that room.

This was somewhat of an educated person, she took the time to name her degrees and her expertise, but somehow she didn’t quite understand just how ridiculously preposterous her statement was.

She might as well as said, “Whether you believe in Santa Claus or not there are men dressed in red suits at the mall.”

While it is true that men dress in red suits at the mall, particularity during the holiday season, that does not support nor does it prove that there is a Santa Claus!

Neither does drawing a false correlation between the fact that the earth’s climate does change to validate the erroneous claims of Global warming, prove the theory of Global warming!

Dr David Evans a one time proponent of anthropogenic global warming spent six years doing carbon accounting, building models for the Australian government to estimate carbon emissions from land use change and forestry. When he started that job in 1999 Evans says the evidence that carbon emissions caused global warming seemed pretty conclusive, but since then new evidence has weakened that case. Therefore he is now skeptical.

So scientific evidence changed the mind of Dr. Evans, which is quite extraordinary because global warming was Dr. Evans’ livelihood as he outlines in his article, “I was on the Global warming Gravy Train.”

Coming out against the political correct accepted model that man-made carbon dioxide emissions are the cause for raises in the earth’s temperature would put Dr. Evans out of a job. Yet he did just that with his paper entitled, “Carbon Emissions Don’t Cause Global Warming”

Some of us will continue to accept and support fallacious climate change arguments no matter what the scientific evidence. But according to a growing body of scientist and scientific evidence, “It’s not CO2 that causes Global warming, stupid!” (see video)

Congratulations!!!!!!

The Dems have just come up with a plan........... (finally),
but one that has no chance in hell, of ever working.

Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi intend to block the lifting of the
offshore drilling ban. In their infinite wisdom, and against
the wishes of a very large majority of American voters, the
congressional Democrats will do all they can to prevent
President Bush’s lifting of the offshore drilling ban from
becoming fact.

What is wrong with these morons? Are they that stupid
naturally, or did they have to take special “Congressional
Idiot” courses? With each passing day they show that
their heads and their asses are totally interchangable,
that they took office under false pretenses. As usual,
Democrats campaign promises in no way correlate to fact.

Talk to any first-year economics student, and he/she will
tell you that when the US federal government legislates or
regulates who may buy what on the world market, the trading
simply moves offshore. What good will it do to prevent
oil speculators from running up the market in the US, when
we can only “control” less than 15% of the world’s oil output.
The best that can happen is these speculators will move offshore,
out of reach of the US government, and the idiots who came
up with such a brilliant idea.

Of course it never occurred to them that by immediately
authorizing offshore drilling, opening up Anwar, using the
billions of barrels of shale oil in the Rockies, and authorizing
immediate construction of 45 new nuclear power plants......
we could see improving oil prices thoughout the world in a
couple of months. All that the markets need is the FEAR
that the US will become energy independent quickly, and
you will see prices fall like a lead balloon. The speculators
will tread cautiously, for fear of stepping into the deep end
of the pool, and the Saudis will have to increase production
in order to retain the income to which they have become
accustomed.

Once the urgency is addressed, we can proceed with research
into wind, solar, water and biofuels, which will take much
longer to become a reality, than tapping the oil we know is
in the ground.

In addition to moving toward energy independence, these actions
will create millions of new jobs, and prevent the “tax and spend”
liberals from completely ruining the country. The last thing we
need on top of the present oil crisis, is for some self-serving idiot like Obama to get into office and raise taxes on EVERYONE. If you take a look at his plan, IN DETAIL, his idea of “rich” is anyone making over $50,000 per year. Even if you believe the hype
that he is going to “reduce” your taxes by $1,000, he hides very
well, the undisputable fact that when he allows the Bush tax cuts
to expire...... your taxes will actually RISE by $1,500.00

Don’t blame me,..........I didn’t vote the Democrats into office,
you did!

Lights cameras, action!

Sen. Barack Obama and Afghan President Hamid Karzai in Kabul

It's all fake! It’s the making of the image of a President named Obama. One might call it high drama; I would call it fantasy on the scale of the new Batman movie the Dark Knight. I’m just waiting to see if Keith Ledger’s nomination for an Oscar will be in any way threatened.

Andrea Mitchell just blew up Sen. Obama’s foreign policy burnishing. Chris Matthew’s leg may tingle whenever he hears Barack Obama speak but even a tingling Chris Matthew’s leg wouldn’t help Sen. Obama now.

Obama’s campaign hoped a few pictures with foreign dignitaries and touring the war zone would give the Senator foreign policy credibility by osmosis not to mention the Senator took a plane load of reporters to record the Senators every step.

But wait according to Andrea Mitchell, Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent for NBC News up to this point no reporter has been allowed within arms length of the Senator.

Everything coming out of this trip is completely staged to ensure that the Senator doesn’t make one of the gaffes that he so frequently makes. There has not been one substantial interview by a real reporter. What’s so incredible about this is Mitchell breaks this story and Chris Matthews attempts to continue on with glowing accolades of his hero as if Ms. Mitchell didn’t just bring the whole house down on this made for TV Obama fiction. (see video)



Obama in Iraq a place that by all Democrat accounts Obama shouldn’t even be in, because according to Sen. Harry Reid, Congressman John Murtha and the good Sen. Obama himself the war in Iraq was lost. And Iraq is now under the control of al Qaeda.

What?!? That isn’t so? That’s not the reality of Iraq? The surge actually did work? Iraq is stable enough for a United States presidential hopeful to visit and tour with an entourage of news and campaign filmmakers who will use this trip as a campaign ad for Sen. Obama.

I can’t wait! But in all fairness, I must admit that any campaign ad that I see coming out of the middle east and Europe featuring Sen. Obama will only remind me of how wrong he, his Democrat allies and the Liberal leaning media was about Iraq and the surge. I will see any ad or news account as proof that the Republicans were right and that they alone are deserving of winning in the House, the Senate and the White house in November.

Oh wait a minute Obama’s not using the real reporters that he took to cover his trip, that’s almost as low as planting questions in a democrat debate to make one look good. I guess Obama and Clinton do have some things in common. Clinton plants questions and Obama fakes foreign policy tour movies.

Here’s another movie term, “cut.” Senator Obama will probably hear that term after the fake media and fake film crew wrap up filming his descent on Iraq, only thing is when the Democrats use that term “and run” is usually attached to it!