Schwarzenegger Next?

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger

If the Electoral College appoints [Barack Obama] as President of The United States of America on December 15, 2008 and Congress ratifies that choice, and it is later proven that he is not a US citizen, then not one single word he utters will be valid as representing this country. –Mark S. McGrew, Pravda

Arnold Schwarzenegger wants to be President of the United States of America we’ve known it for years and who can deny him? The Federal courts, the U.S. Supreme Court, the Electoral College, the Senate? Fact is there is no controlling legal authority that could stop Arnold if he would just go for it!

The only thing that could stop someone like Arnold would be his own personal code of ethics but providing that he didn’t have any then even he an Austrian born naturalized U.S. citizen could just disregard the constitution and became President. (see story)

Talk of amending the Constitution was a hot topic in California and Washington during Schwarzenegger's first couple of years in office--Michael Rothfeld

Isn’t it a coincidence that an associate lawyer in a Chicago-based firm whose partner served on a finance committee for then Sen. Barack Obama has advocated for the elimination of the U.S. Constitution's requirement that a president is be a "natural-born" citizen, calling the requirement "stupid" and asserting it discriminates, is outdated and undemocratic.

The paper was written in 2006 by Sarah Herlihy, just two years after Obama had won a landslide election in Illinois to the U.S. Senate. Herlihy is listed as an associate at the Chicago firm of Kirkland & Ellis. A partner in the same firm, Bruce I. Ettelson, cites his membership on the finance committees for both Obama and Sen. Richard Durbin on the corporate website.(see story) and (see paper)

If there is one thing that President-elect Barack Obama has proven is one shouldn’t allow a little thing like the U.S. constitution stop one from following his or her dream Arnold. Just think of all of the little foreign born boys and girls who are dreaming to one day become President of the United States of America.

According to Mark S. McGrew President elect Barack Obama has successfully ignored a Federal Lawsuit asking him to produce a valid Birth Certificate. When the time to respond to a lawsuit filed by attorney Philip Berg expired, under Federal Court Rules, they all admitted that he was not a citizen of The United States of America and deemed to have committed fraud. A normal man would have been found to have admitted he was not a US citizen but not Obama and so far the Supreme court has allowed the obliteration of the constitution. (see story)

The U.S. Supreme Court has denied 2 request by citizens of this country who were attempting to do the job that American judges and justices won’t do, that is protect and defend the U.S. constitution. The Court is scheduled for a third conference concerning PE Barack Obama’s eligibility, a conference is a meeting at which the justices discuss the merits of a case and whether to accept the case for trial. The Supreme Court is scheduled to consider the case filed by Philip Berg January 9th.

In the meantime the Electoral College met on December 15th and gave PE Obama the constitutional required electoral votes so all that is left is Congressional ratification of the Electoral College vote on January 6th 2009 and the formal inauguration on January 20th and the first other an natural born citizen will be President of the United States of America.

If Arnold really wants to be president Obama has already proved that there is nothing in America that can stop him! No Court, not the Electoral College, not the Congress and neither can the American people stop someone who willingly disregards the blind and flawed founding fathers and the outdated document that they created.

Look at whose intolerant now!

President elect Barack Obama and Pastor Rick Warren

Look homosexuals are always attempting to identify their crazy political grab for power and legitimization with Black people and the civil rights movement which was largely created by Blacks and others who risked their lives for racial equality, but where in the 60 years of Black people working for equal rights did anyone see Blacks demanding that White people just simply jump off of the planet? You didn’t.

Through it all Blacks worked with Whites, some of the same Whites that hated them, disrespected them, discriminated against them and carried on the legacy of 250 years of oppression of the Black race. Blacks didn’t demand that White vanish or be otherwise ostracized for slavery and the sequential Jim Crow discrimination that followed for at least another 150 years after slavery.

So why it is that homosexuals, who are attempting to mimic the Black experience, have it so wrong when it comes to the 97% of the population that believes normal heterosexual relations are the foundation on which humanity is built? Homosexuals can not ask 97% of the heterosexual population to go away and neither should heterosexuals feel compelled to stand aside while homosexuals attempt to reinvent definitions of civil rights, marriage and family.

Yet for whatever the reason Barack Obama has asked Rick Warren, Pastor of the Saddleback Church (which Obama and Sen. John McCain had their historical faith meeting earlier this year) to do the honors of the invocation at the Presidential inauguration January 20, 2009.

However according to Politico.com homosexuals have gone absolutely livid that such an inclusive invitation was extended to a Christian who believes the teachings of his faith regarding homosexuality. (see story)

The rapid, angry reaction from a range of gay activists comes as the gay rights movement looks for an opportunity to flex its political muscle.--BEN SMITH & NIA-MALIKA HENDERSON, Politico

After the somewhat surprising and historic support for marriage in California homosexuals are attacking anyone and everyone who dare oppose their agenda of redefining social and culture norms through Orwellian language and legal coercion.

According to the Politico homosexuals are attempting to force either Obama to change his selection from Warren or they hope Warren will be intimidated into shrieking away from the invitation. In an Orwellian speak laced letter the President of the Human Rights Campaign wrote Mr. Obama:

“Your invitation to Reverend Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at your inauguration is a genuine blow to LGBT Americans,” the president of Human Rights Campaign, Joe Solomonese, wrote Obama Wednesday. “[W]e feel a deep level of disrespect when one of architects and promoters of an anti-gay agenda is given the prominence and the pulpit of your historic nomination.”

There is so much wrong with this type of thinking and on so many levels that I will devote time in the upcoming days on how homosexuals use language to confuse their agenda with the civil rights movement and also how they intend to infuse their deviancy with language of normalcy in order to advance their cause.

Calling for the exclusion of Warren from the inauguration is what one would expect from anti-religionist bigots not a group which is suppose to be advocating for total acceptance and tolerance. To which I say: My, my look at whose intolerant now!

Maybe homosexuals don’t see Christians in this “new era that’s dawning.” Maybe just maybe only those who have been left behind will be in the homosexual vision of a new era!

We can always hope can’t we!

Scandal plagued Obama should show Birth Certificate and fire Emanuel

Rahm Emanuel (right) and Gov. Rod Blagojevich

An Emanuel source said it was "possible" that Emanuel discussed the appointment with Harris and that a specific date was mentioned. "Valerie was deciding whether she wanted to go the Senate. Others had talked to her about it. There were plenty of people who talked to her about it and thought she would be a good choice," the source said. -- NATASHA KORECKI AND FRAN SPIELMAN,ChicagoSunTimes

Apparently its one thing to stand behind a blue placard pretending that you are the Office of the President-elect while naming people to fill your future cabinet post and then it is quite another thing to send your emissaries into the sewer of Chicago politics, from whence you came, to negotiate the bequeathal of your vacated senate seat to a confidante and loyal ally.

President-elect Barack Hussein Obama has unequivocally stated that neither he nor any of his team has been involved in the Gov. Blagojevich scandal of quid pro quo politics.(see story)

“I have never spoken to the governor on this subject. I am confident that no representatives of mine would have any part of any deals related to this seat. I think the materials released by the U.S. attorney reflect that fact,” —President-elect Barack Obama

Yet sources say that Congressman Rahm Emanuel, PE Obama choice for Chief of Staff of the Obama administration, contacted Gov. Blagojevich people 21 times, recorded on court ordered wiretap probably unknown to him or Blagojevich, to ensure that PE Obama would get his personal pick of Valerie Jarrett place in the Senate spot. (see story)

According to the Noquarter blog an Obama advisor only identified as “Advisor A” on at least two occasions spoke to the Obama team about receiving something for the Senate seat. In a November 5, 2008 conversation;

• Blagojevich speaks to Advisor A
• Blagojevich mentions how Obama could remove someone from the Board of a private foundation and appoint Blagojevich
• Blagojevich voices demands for something for the seat, and he reiterates an intention to appoint himself to the seat

Then on November 7, 2008 the follow conversation ensues;

• Blagojevich speaks with Advisor A
• Blagojevich tells Advisor A he will offer the seat to Jarrett if he is appointed Secretary of Health and Human Services

If Advisor A is indeed Rahm Emanuel and if Congressman Emanuel relayed Gov. Blagojevich’s request to his boss, PE Obama then that completes the Quid pro quo circuit and contrary to Mr. Obama’s assertions his office was deeply involved in this conspiracy. (see story)

Whether or not the US attorney will go after a man that is days away from being inaugurated the 44th President of the United States of America is the question that remains to be answered.

But in all likelihood Obama will enter office with this another taint on his Presidency.

What an auspicious start for the first Black President. To enter office thought of by half of the electorate as a conman who usurped power by run for the office knowing that he is ineligible to do so because he is not a natural born citizen of the United States of America and second being involved in Chicago styled corrupt politics of Quid Pro Quo up to days of his inauguration.

So much for openness and transparency that Obama promised. If Obama wishes to be believed by anyone at all he needs to show that he is a natural born citizen before January 20, 2009 and fire Emanuel for his part in the Senate Seat for Sale scandal!

December 15, 2008

Electoral Colleges across the country voted 12/15/08

As mandated by the United States Constitution at noon December 15, 2008 state electors all across the country voted and signed their names in all 50 states and the District of Columbia making official the election results of November 4, 2008, that Barack Hussein Obama and Joseph Biden will be the 44th President and the 49th Vice President of the United States of America. Did you miss it? (see story)

One would think that the significance of this occasion would have been widely heralded but it went largely unnoticed by media and political pundits alike who seemed to be smitten with the Blagojevich corruption watch, the Iraqi farewell news conference and shoe drive held for President Bush and the finding of what could be little Caylee Anthony’s remains.

With all of that important news who would notice that Barack Obama is mere steps closer to achieving his goal of become the Nations first openly Black President, who by the way, is not at all open about his constitutional eligibility to hold the office. (No original birth certificate produced yet!)

In spite of the questions and clouds of corrupt that surround the Illinois politician regarding his Senate seat, his associations and his origin of birth, one of the last constitutional provisions which are meant to protect the American people, the Electoral College sanctioned Obama-Biden. (see story)

The process as reported by ANDY BARR of politico, Electors must cast ballots for both president and vice president and sign six “Certificates of Vote” and “Certificates of Ascertainment” that report the results to the nearest federal judge, each Secretary of State, the National Archives and Vice President Dick Cheney. On January 6, Cheney will read the results and certify the election in front of a joint session of Congress before Obama is sworn in on January 20.

Therefore the only steps remaining after the December 15th Electoral College will be the Electoral College’s results will be certified on January 6, 2009 by Vice President Dick Cheney before a join session of Congress leaving only Obama’s and Biden’s swearing in ceremony on January 20, 2009.

A historic accomplishment? I’ll say! The first non-natural U.S. born person elected President of the United States of America.

Now that’s Constitutional fundamental change! Change which indicates that the Constitution is no longer the controlling authority of this nation.

America your end is near December 15, 2008 is but one benchmark of that dreaded faithful end, January 6, 2009 is another and January 20th 2009 is another.

Finally, shoes thrown at your President who is supposed to be the most powerful man in the world is the strongest indication to date that America’s power is waning and your end America is near!

Obama’s own Investigation Clears Himself

Congressman and Presidential Chief of Staff to be Rahm Emanuel

President-elect Barack Obama said Monday a review by his own lawyer shows he had no direct contact with Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich about the appointment of a Senate replacement, and transition aides did nothing inappropriate.-- CHICAGO (AP)

Is that right Obama conducted his own investigation? You can’t make this kind of stuff up! Conducting his own investigation on himself President elect Barack Obama found that not he or any of his staff did anything wrong. Hmm, Okay!

So you there, just move along there is nothing here for you to see there was no criminal activity committed by the Obama transaction team. So move on. (see story)

However it is interesting that Chicago AP reported that Obama, fielding questions at a news conference, sidestepped when asked whether his Chief of Staff to be, Rahm Emanuel had spoken with aides to the governor about potential Senate appointees.

Then according to the Chicagotribune.com one source confirmed that communications between Emanuel and the Blagojevich administration were captured on court-approved wiretaps. The Chicagotribune reports that Obama Chief of staff Emanuel did in fact have multiple talks with Gov. Blagojevich. (see story)

Another source said that contact between the Obama camp and the governor's administration regarding the Senate seat began the Saturday before the Nov. 4 election, when Emanuel made a call to the cell phone of Harris. The conversation took place around the same time press reports surfaced about Emanuel being approached about taking the high-level White House post should Obama win. (see 1:56min video)



Emanuel delivered a list of candidates who would be "acceptable" to Obama, the source said. On the list were Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett, Illinois Veterans Affairs director Tammy Duckworth, state Comptroller Dan Hynes and U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky of Chicago, the source said. All are Democrats.

Sometime after the election, Emanuel called Harris back to add the name of Democratic Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan to the approved list, the source said.

Among other things, a government affidavit filed with the charges claimed that Blagojevich had kicked around the idea of using his Senate selection to leverage an appointment to an ambassadorship or Cabinet post in the Obama administration.

We need to know how much of this was broached with the Obama team.

Unlike Obama Emanuel who is now working full-time on Obama's transition, has yet to resign his congressional seat. Illinois law has a different process for filling vacant House seats than Senate seats. But remember Vice President elect Joe Biden hasn’t resigned his Senate seat either only Obama has. When Emanuel resigns, a special election will be held for his replacement.

One alleged scheme outlined in the charges against Blagojevich involves the special election for Emanuel's seat when it becomes vacant. The government affidavit said Blagojevich and others were recorded talking about an unnamed "president-elect adviser" concerned about the election for Emanuel's congressional seat who might help the governor land a new job at a non-profit organization. If this is true we have the conspiracy to sell Obama's Senate seat and also a conspiracy around Emanuel's Congressional seat as well.

But just disregard anything that you might hear that might incriminate Obama, his Chief of Staff or his transaction team, Obama has done a thorough job investigation himself and his personal attorney says that neither Barack Obama nor his transaction team were involved in the play for pay scheme to sell the Senate seat that Obama resigned early to allow Gov. Blagojevich to “fill.”

Finally, in the follow video radio talk show host Michael Savage gives background on Rahm Emanuel and the corruption that has come out of Chicago and is now released into the world of American politics. (see 5:33min video)




Yeah Obama came out of the cesspool of Chicago politics but we are to believe that he is completely pristine and untouched from the corruption which is Chicago politics.

INSULT!

Shoe thrown at President Bush

"This is a gift from the Iraqis; this is the farewell kiss, you dog. This is from the widows, the orphans and those who were killed in Iraq." –Iraq shoe throwing Journalist

It was an Insult against American! The sole of the shoe is an ultimate insult in the middle eastern world. Two years ago at the toppling of Saddam Hussein’s statue one of the ways that the Iraqi people celebrated was by striking the statue with shoes as a sign of disrespect. (see 2:02min. video)



In an ironic turn of events as President Bush visits Iraq on Sunday to highlight the recently completed security agreement between the United States and Iraqi government the United States is insulted by an attack against its president. (see 2:10min.video)



After all of the efforts the United States made under the leadership of President Bush to mitigate collateral damage and after all of the efforts to be as respectful of Islam and the Iraqi people that the United States could possibly be this highly vetted Iraqi reporter is able to hurl insults at America by disrespecting our President. (see story)

Do not think for a moment that president elect Barack Obama will escape such disrespect Al Qaeda's No. 2 leader, Ayman Zawahiri has already called Obama a Malcolm X pejorative, a “House Nigger” or House Negro. (see story)

If this latest slight of president Bush is allowed because its only perceived as an isolated insular attack against Bush instead of the international act of aggression against America that it was then President elect Obama will be weakened as all Americans, even as high as the American president, are viewed as vulnerable targets throughout the world.

The Automotive Mess!!!!

Ok, we have a mess on our hands. But why do the American taxpayers have to foot the bill for yet another bailout? And one with no guarantees no less.

Pass some 15 Billion dollars of our money off to the imcompetent idiots who have been running the business, and it will only stave off total bankruptsy for maybe a few months.

Oh, and it's not just the management of the Big 3 who are at fault! Take a close look at the UAW's record of demanding more and more over the past thrity years. Remember who it was who actually sowed the seeds of today's problems, when things were still actually running pretty well.

When the robotics technology was introduced (by American developers)and presented to the Big 3, the UAW was the first to complainthat it was going to force layoffs of their workers. Never mind that the workers were employed by Ford, GM and Chrysler, the unions and often the members, feel that they work for the union.Immediately, they threatened "Strike!" if the technology was
introduced. Of course the UAW wasn't worrying about the workers,
but about the huge dues that would be lost if anyone were let go.
Unions have always worried about their "special funds" and top leaders, with the needs of the members coming second.
This is just a continuation of "business as usual"

I say, let the auto makers sink!!!......... we can't be responsible for greedy unions and poor management. They made their beds, so let them fall out of them if they want. It's time to cut the cord, and let them go. For years, they were warned to produce cars that were practical, inexpensive and safe........... those three things never came together. Not in American cars at least. Then they wonder why the Japanese have beaten their pants off. I can tell you why in a few simple words. Greed, greed, greed! Greedy union executives. Greedy business executives. The unions worried about their golden contracts, and the executives worried about their golden parachutes. It's OVER!!!!

Bankruptsy is the solution. Let them collapse, and then the courts will dictate the union contracts. Make them viable with a working company, that can produce a worthy car at a fair price. That is the only way out of this mess!

The Japanese manufacturers are producing cars, with labor costs at one third of what the American makers do. Between actual salary, contributions to pension, medical and other union-demanded benefits, the American worker is earning approximately $60 per hour. OBSCENE! How could anyone expect Ford, Chrysler or GM to produce affordable cars with expenses like that? Add to that the overpaid excecutive expenses at these plants, and there is not a doubt in my mind, that the courts could do it better!

U.N. Pushes New Warming Treaty In spite of Global Cooling

Dr. Rajendra Pachauri

“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” - Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.

Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, told The Associated Press in an interview Tuesday December 9, 2008 that there was no conclusive evidence the world is in imminent danger [due to Global warming].

"I don't think we should jump to conclusions if we get material that is based on the last one or two years," the Indian scientist said. The IPCC issues its reports every five or six years.

This statement was neatly tucked away in an article reported by Arthur Max of the Associated Press December 10, 2008 announcing that a UNIPCC panel is set to negotiate a new climate treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012. (see story)

But wait one Global warming catastrophic moment; isn’t the whole Al Gore inconvenient lie based on the scare that we and the planet are in imminent danger? And hasn’t scientific warnings of potential catastrophe been the impetus that has keep Media and the “Go Green” environmentalist at the forefront of tilting at Global warming windmills which, by the way, make them part and parcel of this Global warming fallacy. Because it is their efforts that are key to ginning up support from misinformed earth environmental do-gooders.

This is all an effort to place humanity on environmental lockdown while Internationalist control the planet with environmentally friendly draconian international edicts called Kyoto protocol or some other fascist anti CO2 international environmental treaty.

“CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another….Every scientist knows this, but it doesn’t pay to say so…Global warming, as a political vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver’s seat and developing nations walking barefoot.” - Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology Research at Chubu University in Japan.

Furthermore, this is all a United Nations plan to create a global environmental tax a new stream of global money which will give unelected U.N. representatives the resources they need to govern the world from a centralized base of power.

“The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification in the fact that it is something that generates funds.” - Award-winning Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo Tonni, of the Committee for Scientific Research in Buenos Aires and head of the Paleontology Department at the University of La Plata.

The U.N. will build an Empire on a treaty to control the emission of greenhouse gases and President Barack Obama’s people of the world will be the U.N.’s loyal chattel from which to extract fees and taxes to implement this one world rule. This will all be enacted under pseudo scientific claims that these actions are needed to save the planet.

Lawrence E. Buja, a climate change researcher for the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado claims that there now is ironclad proof of anthropogenic global warming so the way should be cleared to proceed with plans and solutions.

Is that true? Is there now irrefutable proof of anthropogenic catastrophe global warming/climate change?

Mr. Buja is referring to a IPCC study published last year of the collected the work of more than 2,000 scientists, which states that climate change is "unequivocal, is already happening, and is caused by human activity."

However the scientific evidence shows a much different outcome than the failed theory of global warming. In actuality scientific data show that the earth is cooling and that 2008 will be the coolest year this decade despite objection from biased scientists that make their livings from the pop scientist of global warming the evidence shows cooling not warming. (see story)

Also as reported by Lorne Gunter, Don Easterbrook, a geologist at Western Washington University, says, "It's practically a slam dunk that we are in for about 30 years of global cooling," as the sun enters a particularly inactive phase.

His examination of warming and cooling trends over the past four centuries shows an "almost exact correlation" between climate fluctuations and solar energy received on Earth, while showing almost "no correlation at all with CO2." (see story)

I think Comedian George Carlin says it best about anti CO2 fanatics and Environmental Global warmist (See 7:39min video)



Listening to a Comedian’s take on Global warming beats voting for a Comedian to be Senator of Minnesota any day! One you can take serious the other is a literal joke Minnesota!

Much like the joke that Al Gore and his Dr. James Hansen produced, U.N. backed preposterous theory of anthropogenic Global warming turned out to be!

Yo Ho Ho and a Tanker of Oil

Somali pirates in small boats hijacked the arms-laden Ukrainian freighter Faina

[T]he world’s legal apparatus is woefully confused as to how to respond to piracy. Are the Somali pirates ordinary criminals, or a quasi-military force?-- DOUGLAS R. BURGESS Jr., The New York Times

Blimy me buckoos where's international law when ye need it?

Piracy on the high seas me maties. Argh, and the seas are governed by international laws and absolutely no wooden leg seadog is enforcing it.



DOUGLAS R. BURGESS Jr.’s, “Piracy is Terrorism” gives us all a look at what life will be under international law and if we choose to pursue terrorist with subpoenas and arrest warrants under the Obama administration and Globalist treaties. (see story)

In clear acts of war against the civilized world, Somali pirates brazenly exploit the dovish course that the western world is on as Islamofascist terrorism escalates its assault against the western world’s economic power.

According to Burgess, the question [of whether these acts are a violation of international law or acts of war] is not insignificant. It has virtually paralyzed the navies [of countries] called to police the Gulf of Aden. The German Navy frigate Emden, on patrol this spring to intercept Qaeda vessels off the Somali coast, encountered pirate vessels attacking a Japanese tanker. But since it was allowed to intervene only if the pirates were defined as “terrorists,” the Emden had no choice but to let the pirates go.

Currently, 13 vessels are held by pirates in the Gulf of Aden, while the navies of a dozen nations circle almost helplessly.

13 vessels are held by pirates in the Gulf of Aden laden with everything from oil to military weapons and the world’s internationalist don’t know what to do?

I heard that the pirates are asking for multi-millions of dollars in ransom moneys to help fund international terrorism. Recent evidence indicates that the Somali pirates hand over a part of their millions in ransom money to Al Shabaab, the Somali rebel group that has been linked to Al Qaeda.



I say pay them! American taxpayers were just ripped off of 3 to 6 trillion dollars in the largest hijacking of a financial economy in world history a few multi-millions to get the Saudi oil back, which helps fund terrorism, is a small price to pay for a people who are going to be put on the hook for international taxes on Global warming as we are all headed for in a one world rule global economy under the control of terrorist whether they wear facial hoods and carry semi-automatic weapons or whether they hide behind laws and treaties as they exploit their booty from law abiding taxpayers.

Unlike Burgess I don’t think international law, treaties or courts are the answer to terrorism by piracy. As Burgess demonstrates by his arguments there is already hundreds of years of international law enough to deal with the Somali pirates but no one is doing anything but paying the demanded ransom. Unless international attorneys trade in their briefcases for armament or some country or countries declare war on these scoundrels hapless internationalist will continue to stand by as they always do as threats go unchallenged in the world.

Remember Darfur anyone? What has international law done about Darfur?

Obama's Chicago Three Card Monty

Gov. Rod Blagojevich and President-elect Obama

"I know he's talked to the governor," David Axelrod, 11/23/08 on Fox News

Like trying to beat a fast talking Chicago street thug in a game of Three Card Monty you can't pick the right card to win against Barack Obama.

Pick a card any card now watch Obama mix 'em. You picked birth certificate. Sorry that's not the card U.S. Supreme Court says so. Next!

You picked the card corrupted associations that's William Ayers, Tony Rezko, Saul Alinsky and Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Sorry Obama was elected in spite of his relationships with these men. Besides Obama didn't know what these men were up to! Sorry that's not the card.

You picked the card Acorn, Moveon.org, George Soros and Chicago styled corrupted politics. Sorry again total malfeasance and corrupted politics but once again you can't blame Barack Obama for the actions of others. Wrong card again.

Okay you getting wise you following the cards you think you can get it now? Its only three cards so let Obama mix 'em and now you pick okay you picked Chicago Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich a criminal complaint and arrest against him for corruption, attempting to sell Obama's Senate seat and swearing that Obama was going to have to pay him big time for the favor of putting Obama's choice and long time confidante Valerie Jarrett (who has now withdrawn her name from consideration) in the Senate seat Quid Pro Quo. (see story)



On November 23, you even got Obama adviser David Axelrod saying. "I know he's talked to the governor," Axelrod said this on Fox News Chicago in response to a question about Obama's involvement in filling his Senate seat but in classic Obama Orwellian scrubbing of the news to reinvent the truth the smoking gun video of Axelrod actually saying that Obama knew has been taken off of You Tube! (see story)

The vids been scrubbed and Axelrod another highly trained Con man is saying that he misspoke in this best Orwellian Wilson Smith impersonation.

But wait you remember former Special prosecutor PATRICK FITZGERALD? Fitzgerald is now the Illinois U.S. Attorney. He steps in and halts the investigation on Gov. Blagojevich saying that his office is making "no allegations" that President-elect Barack Obama was aware of any alleged scheming and then he promptly arrests Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich before a visible link can be established to Obama. Fitzgerald said that Gov. Blagojevich was on a crime spree and Obama didn’t know anything about it? Oh please!

This is classic Obama everyone around him is either a criminal, a radical or a malcontent and he knows or knew nothing about any of it!

Obama himself is making the round and guess what he’s saying… that’s right he knew nothing about Gov. Blagojevich, in the words of Peter the denier of Jesus, Obama never knew the man! Yeah that and a ham sandwich will make you a Muslim! (see story)

Might I remind you that after winning the General Election Obama moved his whole operation to Chicago. At first I scratched my head and thought now that's strange. But I guess Rod Blagojevich Chicago politics is what Obama knew best.

Yet once again Obama is being shielded from any appearance of guilt. Sorry this too is the wrong card if you thought that Obama was selling his Senate seat Quid pro quo. That of course is according to Patrick Fitzgerald another Chicagoan, David Axelrod who can't seem to get his story straight and the Con man der-in-Chief elect Barack Hussein Obama!

See you can't beat a playa doing his thug thizzle with the Chicago Three Card Monty! The Gov. of Illinois Rod Blagojevich may be as guilty as hell for attempting to sell the open Senate seat of Barack Obama and Blagojevich may have been waiting for some kind of Quid pro Quo from Barack Obama but fool this three card Monty is Obama's game you can’t bet a playa at his own game so Sorry suckers you lose again. You just can't pick the right card against the next Con Man der-in-chief.

Conmander-in-Chief

Pravda a Russian news paper referred to President-elect Obama as a Conman. Question, who would want his presidency tainted with the aspersion that he conned his way into the Whitehouse? Pravda reports that our enemies are already ready to discount a tainted president. (see story)

This is supposed to be an historic Presidency, upwards of 4 million people to attention the January 20th 2009 inauguration and the President-elect doesn’t care enough to quiet his distracters by producing a birth certificate and have the biggest I told you so this side of the millennium?

Here is a man who obviously cared enough about getting elected he put up a stop the smears website to answer each and every allegation against him.

Obama did not allow one John McCain charge to go unanswered on the campaign trail he hired a rapid response team to answer every assault or insult against his person or his image in a quick rapid fire 24 hour manner.

So why would Barack Hussein Obama allow the honestly asked questions about his citizenship and his constitutional eligibility go hanging about like big ugly albatrosses around his neck?

Half of the American electoral populist that’s 58.3 million people who voted against him think that there could be something wrong with the way the first Black President got elected. That is a disgrace for Black people and that is a disgrace for America.

Fortunately for Mr. Obama there is a simple fix, much simpler than fixing the distressed almost bankrupted U.S. economy. All that Obama would have to do is call a press conference and stand behind that official looking cool blue “Office of the President-elect” placard and show the American people that he didn’t actually con his way into the White house he is indeed eligible for the office that he is about to take. Look see, here my original birth certificate, he should say. What’s so hard about that?

The fact that Obama has this information all locked up takes away any argument that he has shown a valid original birth certificate. The fact that Barack Obama has as of November 27th 2008 spent over $500,000 and has dispatched an small army of attorneys to Hawaii to keep a $10 dollar Birth Certificate from being seen by the American people should give even the most ardent of blind Obama backers pause.

To date Mr. Obama as not disclosed any of the following information:

Certificate of Live Birth

Columbia College records
Columbia Thesis paper
Certification of Live Birth showing where born
Harvard College records

Illinois State Senate records
Illinois State Senate schedule
Law practice client list and billing records/summary
Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mothers
Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)
Occidental College records

Parent's Marriage Certificate
Record of baptism
Selective Service Registration
Trips schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007
Scholarly articles
Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups (source)

In spite of the above the Supreme Court Monday has turned down an emergency appeal from Leo Donofrio who says Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because he was a British subject at birth and they will not intervene in the presidential election.

Donofrio contended that Obama is not a "natural born citizen," as the president is required to be under Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution. The case, referred to the court by Justice Clarence Thomas after Justice David Souter had rejected it, argued that because Obama's father was a citizen of Kenya, at the time a British colony, the president-elect was born with dual citizenship.

This failure of the U.S. Supreme Court to enforce the Constitution represents a failure of American constitutional system at all levels. All any court along the way had to do was order Mr. Obama to show proof of eligibility, the fact that none did indicate a breech in the American system that any unscrupulous individual(s) could work for their own personal gain.

Lynn Stuter reports that the FBI has a file on Barack Obama that proves he is not an American citizen. If this is true no government agency feels the responsibility to protect the constitution. (See story)

This means that America will have its very first Conmander-in-Chief sworn in on January 20th.

An Obama Presidency a National Security Risk?

Barack Obama, Timothy Geithner and Christina Romer behind the non-existent Office of the President-elect

Barack Obama may just win his place in history as the greatest con man of all time.

A hundred million people believed him and spent 600 million dollars to get him “elected” to the highest office in America, without ever knowing if he is or is not eligible to even run as an American citizen. It is either amazing that he will pull it off or it is amazing that so many millions of people believed him.

If the Electoral College appoints him as President of The United States of America on December 15, 2008 and Congress ratifies that choice, and it is later proven that he is not a US citizen, then not one single word he utters will be valid as representing this country.

The Courts, our police, our military will have no duty to obey anything he signs. It is also possible that certain people, who were part of and promoted the con, may be charged with Treason. –Mark S. McGrew, Pravda

Like the Office of the President-elect absolutely nothing seems real about Barack Obama.

A Russia newspaper calls President-elect Barack Hussein Obama a conman. The Paper is predicting that if Obama is appointed by the Electoral College to be President of the United States on December 15, 2008 and if that appointment is ratified by Congress the world will see the President of the United States of America as illegitimate and America as an illegitimate world power.

The enemies of America will be able for the first time to say, “America you don’t honor your own constitution how dare you attempt to lead or represent yourselves as representatives of Democracy and Freedom.”

A Barack Obama presidency will signal the breakdown of the American system for the whole world to see. One man and his co-conspirators within his Political Party conned the American people and dissed the constitution. This means the world will view America as a failing hypocritical declining power that can’t enforce its own constitution; it own laws and has no business attempting to lead the world with its newly installed fraudulent government headed by a conman for President.

OBAMA ADMITTED THAT HE IS NOT A UNITED STATES CITIZEN

The Russian paper mocks the U.S. in that it reports that, Barry Sotero, AKA Barack Obama, along with the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission have successfully ignored a Federal Lawsuit asking him to produce a valid Birth Certificate. When the time to respond to that lawsuit expired, under Federal Court Rules, they all admitted that he was not a citizen of The United States of America and deemed to have committed fraud. A normal man would have been found to have admitted he was not a US citizen. (see story)

Barack Obama’s inauguration on January 20th 2009 will mark the end not the beginning of respectability for the United States of America as the world will see how the American people no longer either respect or understand their own Constitution.

The balance of power is already shifting in the world, in was reported that Russia warships are in the western hemisphere for the first time since 1944 via the Panama Canal (see story)

Federal Judge, R. Barclay Surrick dismissed the case, PHILIP J. BERG v BARACK OBAMA, THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION and DOES 1-50 INCLUSIVE, pending in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, three weeks after President-elect Obama’s non-response was proof that he is not a US citizen, thus showing to the world that the United States of America is no longer able or willing to protect its traditions, its laws or its Constitution.

In its current weaken economic and political condition brought on by the Democrat Party the very Party that the American People just elected to the Executive Branch and just reinforced in the Congress, America is well on this way to a political and economic depression that will leave it exposed to attacks from its enemies as Vice President Joe Biden as already forecasted will occur under an Obama administration.

Therefore a fraudulently placed Obama administration, itself, will pose its own daily National Security Risk!

The United States Supreme Court is currently considering whether or not they will consider just one of the many cases filed to protect the Constitution against this fraud.

However Obama’s successful eluding of any controlling legal authority thus far does not bode well for Americans who pray for the rule of law to prevail in this matter unless there is some divine intervention. (An Open Letter to Obama)

Democrats and Obama Knowingly Are Causing Constitutional Crisis for Change

Democrats for Constitutional Crisis

An associate lawyer in a Chicago-based firm whose partner served on a finance committee for then Sen. Barack Obama has advocated for the elimination of the U.S. Constitution's requirement that a president be a "natural-born" citizen, calling the requirement "stupid" and asserting it discriminates, is outdated and undemocratic.--Bob Unruh, Worldnetdaily.com

Humm… now I don’t know but isn’t there some questions whether or not President-elect Barack Hussein Obama is Constitutionally qualified to be President of the United States of America? And weren’t there numerous court filings before the election questioning that fact. And wasn’t a paper advocating for the fundamental change of the constitution to allow other than U.S. natural borns to be President of the United States written two years after Obama won his senate seat in 2004 by an Obama associate? (see paper)

Is there a connection? You bet your sweet American birth right there is!


Today the Supreme Court is reviewing petitions as to whether President-elect Barack H. Obama is constitutionally qualified to be President of the United States of America. (see story)

This issue has been going on since before the Democrat National Convention and was filed in August of 2008. Hillary Clinton supporter and attorney Philip Berg filed suit asking someone, anyone to take responsibility and protect the American people and the U.S. constitution from possible fraud. Berg’s suit named Barack Obama, Howard Dean and the entire DNC his petition asked to enjoin the Democratic National Committee from nominating Obama. The petition stated that is was feared that if Obama were nominated as the Democrat Presidential candidate his questionable citizenship would at some point cause a constitutional crisis.

Do not be fooled they all knew well before the Democrat nomination process and well before the November 4 general elections that there was a major constitutional problem with Obama running but they did nothing!

Neither the DNC nor any lower courts would ask Obama for his birth certificate committing what I consider political and legal malfeasance and negligence. So now we find ourselves with a constitutional crisis just 46 days away from inaugurating a person which he and his entire Political Party possibly knowingly campaigned and fraudulently presented himself, Barack Hussein Obama, as someone eligible to be elected president of this country.

Nevertheless, this question is larger than Barack Obama. The question is should a Political Party that knowingly committed fraud in an election be awarded victory based on that fraud? In other words if Obama is found constitutionally ineligible to be President of the United States of America the constitution allows for the Vice president-elect to be designated President in the disqualified person’s place.

However if the entire Party knew directly or indirectly that Obama was not qualified to be president and knowingly defrauded the constitution and the American people by aiding and abetting Obama in his fraudulent pursuit of the presidency it is my sense that that Party logically should not be allowed to enjoy any of the fruits of their ill-gotten gains. (see story)

Simply stated no Democrat should benefit from the fraud perpetrated on the American people by Obama and the Democrat Party. And since we are in unprecedented waters here, in that, never has a national Party attempted to knowingly fraudulently run a candidate for president it would not be out of the question to undo what the Democrats have done by holding another national election and retain the current president until the taint of fraud over the national elections which Democrats cause is corrected.

This is the constitutional crisis that the Democrats and Barack Obama have perpetrated on the American people and none of them can say that they didn’t know.

As a web blogger suggested, "So it sure looks like Obama's people have looked into the matter of 'natural born' as far back as early 2006. What is even more disturbing is that it would appear that they are following the thought of: 'If the facts do not support the theory, Destroy the facts!"

If Obama and his people knew, as it appears, that he was not eligible to be President as far back as 2006 before he announced his candidacy in 2007 then it is apparent that he being a constitutional attorney knew or thought he would be able to perpetrate this fraud on the American people and there would be no controlling legal authority to stop him. It is every American’s hope that the U.S. Supreme Court proves otherwise.

So stated this would appear to be a criminal act as well as a direct affront to our constitution one which the Democrats and Mr. Obama should have to pay an exacting toll for!

May the Supreme Court find the wherewithal to protect and defend the constitution of the United States of America in spite of the fact that Barack Obama feels that to do so is stupid, biased, outdated, undemocratic and against current trends of globalization.

God save the Republic!

This is a Load of BS!!!!

Let's bail out everyone!!!!

This has become the national joke. Now the auto makers are looking for a minimum 34 BILLION...... and we all know that is the tip of the iceberg. Hand them that money, and within 3 months they will be back looking for three times that amount.

Listening to the arguments on both sides, it comes down the the same thing. More equals more, equals more!

Let them go into Chapter 11, total reorganization under the bankruptsy laws. That way, they will be forced to regoniate union contracts, which to my way of thinking are the primary cause of the overall problem. Add to that, the stupidity and stuborness of management and you have the current problem.

After WW2, when the industry was in it's heyday, the unions took serious advantage of the industry, and made unrealistic demands for its union menbers. Some of the workers make in one week, what workers in other industries make in a month. The union's view was to make it while they could...... as evidenced by the UAW's massive stone ediface in Washington DC.

When robotics were invented in the US, it was the unions, and not management of the auto industry that squawked. Under the guise of "job loss" they prevented the industry from adopting the latest and newest technologies, and therefore laid the groundwork for today's problems.

Frustrated in the US, the developers offered the technology to Japan, ................. and the rest is history. Now, Detroit complains that Japan has taken over the auto industry. Duhhhh.............. what kind of idiots.........both in management and in the unions,............ couldn't see that coming.

Both groups deserve what they are getting today, and the taxpayers should NOT be bailing them out. The unions pushed and pushed for more and more.............now it is time for them to give some of it up. Management has to give up the lucrative bonuses and the high salaries, in order to conform to the real world.

Payback time is here!!!!1

Is Clinton Experienced enough to be Secretary of State?

PE Obama naming Sen. Clinton Secretary of State

ORWELLIAN WORLDVIEW …to hold simultaneously two opinions which canceled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy…-- George Orwell, 1984

Remember all that stuff that President-elect Obama said about his opponent Sen. Hillary Clinton during the campaign? Naw I didn’t think you did… wait a moment I think that I may be able to help. (see 0:15 video)



According to CNSnews.com, during the campaign for the Democratic nomination, Obama mocked Clinton’s primary claim that she possessed the necessary foreign policy experience to be president. (see story)

Obama questioned Sen. Clinton’s foreign policy expertise while flying from a campaign event in Texas. Obama’s statement to reporters who were obviously attempting to gin up controversy between the two of them responded to the question of Clinton’s claim to be an expert on foreign policy in this fashion, “Was she negotiating treaties? Was she handling crises? The answer is no.”

President-elect Obama also questioned Sen. Clinton’s integrity and character during the days of the campaign, “Hillary Clinton will say anything to get elected,” Obama said in a January radio ad. “Hillary Clinton. She’ll say anything and change nothing.”

Last year the Obama campaign also charged that Sen. Clinton’s ideas about foreign policy were extraordinarily similar to President Bush’s policies, “Barack Obama doesn’t need lectures in political courage from someone who followed George Bush to war in Iraq,” the campaign said in a December 2007 statement about Sen. Clinton.

Obama further maligned Clinton by indicating that she did not represent real change, “Real change isn’t voting for George Bush’s war in Iraq and then telling the American people it was actually voting for more diplomacy,” he said about Clinton in March.

Greg Craig, incoming chief counsel, said of Clinton in a March conference call: “There’s no evidence that she participated or asserted herself in any of the crises that took place during the eight years of the Clinton presidency. White House records show that she was consistently absent when critical decisions were being made and that her trips abroad were largely ceremonial.”

Susan Rice, Obama’s choice to become U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, meanwhile, said that a First Lady doesn’t deal with international issues.

“There is no crisis to be dealt with or managed when you are First Lady,” Rice said in March. “You don't get that kind of experience by being married to a commander-in-chief.”

In the most hotly debated dust-up of the primary season – over Clinton’s famous “3 a.m.” ad asking which candidate would better handle a crisis call at three in the morning -- Obama himself said Clinton had already failed the foreign policy test.

“The question is, what kind of judgment you will exercise when you pick up that phone,” Obama said. “In fact, we’ve had a red-phone moment. It was the decision to invade Iraq. Sen. Clinton gave the wrong answer.”

Despite all of the above, President-elect Barack Obama designated Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) to be his next secretary of state on Monday.

In the similiartude of the immortal words of the 1948 film The Treasure of the Sierra Madre spoken by Gold Hat played by Alfonso Bedoya, “Experience, Democrats don’t need no experience, Democrats don’t have to show you no stinking experience!” (Those sentiments apply to the Presidency as well)

Does Sen. Clinton have the experience to be Secretary of State? Well after all she did take on Bosnian sniper fire didn't she?

It is an Orwellian world after all!

Good Obama Hunting

Stockholm Syndrome Republicans (SSRs) (Republicans who have been abused and psychologically defeated by their opponents the Democrats, for over twelve years commentating in both the 2006 and 2008 electoral defeats, who are therefore showing signs of loyalty and sympathy to their captors and vanquishers) are now looking, no are now hoping for some sign or signs that Barack Hussein Obama will not be the racial Marxist Socialist that defeated them with his anti-Bush, anti-Conservative and anti-Americanism rhetoric that seemed to resonate with so many American voters November 4, 2008.

These SSRs are demanding that Obama be given a chance as well as supported in enacting his government with hopes that the reality of governing might make the Neo-Marxist see the error of his ways and instead of governing from his Moveon.org base their hopes are that he will freely chose to move away from his base and govern to the center.

They see the so-called bipartisan Cabinet appointments as a sign of Obama's political benevolence. They are wrong.

But why would he? He didn’t need the center to be elected so why would he need them now? Democrats and the far left are so ensconced in their partisanship that nothing is going to make them vote Republican. Absolutely nothing, there is no alternative to Obama and the moves to fill his cabinet, the mainstream media fawning, and the general approval of his every move are all indicative that this country is ready to be taken over by nefarious forces while we all gaze hypnotically at the personification of the 1960’s radical anti-establishment burn baby burn affirmative action baby who will be President and who will radically change America as he has promised.

Or in the language of the 60’s, “Burn the whole “F”ing thing down!” The “F”ing thing in this case is America as based on the traditions of the Founders and its Constitution. Obama intends to Burn America down. Oh he'll refer to his radical plans as fundamental change as not to alarm anyone!

Any Republican who is fooled by Obama’s methodology doesn’t deserve to be listened to or followed in any capacity. Obama's moves are merely tactical. They are meant to assuage your fears as he places a straggle hold on power that will be irreversible.

Obama promised fundamental change of America, that goes to the ideas and the traditions that make this country uniquely exceptional. If Obama keeps his promises look in the coming days for America to become internationalized by treaties signed by the Obama administration which will appear benign and even helpful at first glance but underlying are filled with iniquitous complications that in essence will strip the United States of America of its sovereignty by putting this country under the control of foreign interest, i.e. The World Court, The World Bank, and World Environmental authorities (carbon regulators).

People of the world the world’s last best hope, America has been finally delivered to you now you can show us how humanistic international law is superior to divinely inspired constitutional law.

Losing America will be the ultimate price paid for looking, no for hunting for some good to come out of electing Barack Obama.

Can any good thing come out of Chicago? America you don’t even know what you’ve voted for!

Two Messages to Obama

Nov. 30: A man tries to cover a dead body as firefighters spray water at a blast site in Gauhati, India. A series of coordinated blasts tore through towns and cities in India's northeastern state of Assam on Thursday.

What does a white racist call a black man with a Ph.D.? A nigger!” --Malcolm X

See video 3:35minsAl Qaeda has sent two messages to President elect Obama. According to the Associated Press al Qaeda's No. 2 leader, Ayman Zawahiri, used a racial epithet to insult Barack Obama in a message posted Wednesday November 19, describing the president-elect in demeaning terms that imply he does the bidding of whites.

The message seems aimed at convincing Muslims and Arabs that Obama does not represent a change in U.S. policies. –The Associated Press

So what does al Qaeda call a Black President? Apparently the same thing as any racist would.

Al Qaeda using the words of Malcolm X sent a message to President elect Barack Obama that if he continued current U.S. policies then he was no better than White people who would continue those same policies. As a matter of fact he was even worst because he would be acting as White's slave.

Then in a second more powerful message 11 days following on November 30th an al Qaeda front group Lashkar-e-Taiba, a Pakistani militant group believed to be connected to Al Qaeda bombed several sites in Gauhati India in a coordinated synchronized killing of 61 people in an effort to kill 5,000 people targeting mainly Americans and Brits. (see story)

India apparently was targeted because India is being developed as one of the new frontiers of American and European capitalism as evident by the outsourcing of thousands of US jobs to India for cheaper labor over the last 10 or more years.

India’s economy is growing exponentially while Americans face an economic down turn that could be a recession leading to a depression. All brought about by corporate outsourcing of American middle class jobs.

Like 9/11 al Qaeda has chosen to strike at the economic strength of America and the free world using this recent bombing in India to do so.

This second message is aimed directly at President elect Obama signaling that American economic interest are not safe anywhere in the world and equally there will be no peace just because America elected a Black man, in al Qaeda’s opinion, to do the White man’s bidding.

The question is where is the world peace that Barack Hussein Obama promised? Both messages issued from al Qaeda indicate that there will be no peace simply because American policy has put on a Black face.

More Change than Americans could have ever imagined

Carbon footprint symbol

This is more change than the any American could have ever imagined when they elected Barack Obama as their President.

One day there will be an International Court composed of unelected and unanswerable judges who are not accountable to U.S. Citizens. These Judges will have the power over nations and peoples to mete out environmental rights and environmental justice over any nation, any international company or any citizen of an aggrieving nation or company.

This International Environmental Climate Change Court will have the ability to prosecute any world citizen and charge them with Environmental crimes. (see story)

One must ask why the world was so anxious to finally have the Democrat Party and the most Liberal member of that Party in power in the United States. Could it be that those who propose International Law to govern all world Nations and who also propose that the International Court at The Hague to be the highest court on the Planet see this as their best hope to achieving their goals of making The Hague Court and this new Environmental Court sovereign over all Nations and their peoples.

According to Louise Gray an Environmental correspondent with the United Kingdom Telegraph.co.uk; Stephen Hockman a deputy High Court judge in the UK is proposing a body similar to the International Court of Justice in The Hague to be the supreme legal authority on issues regarding the environment.

What this means is if the Internationalist have their way the United States will no longer be a sovereign self governed nation we will all be under a one world system with rights defined and or enforced by individuals that we did not select or elect.

The group Greenpeace has already been acquitted in a United Kingdom court of causing more than £35,000 ($53,820 USD) worth of damage to a coal-fired power station, a jury decided that under British Law, Criminal Damage Act 1971 allows damage to be caused to property to prevent even greater damage. In a verdict that shocked British ministers and British energy companies the jury at Maidstone Crown Court cleared six Greenpeace activists of criminal damages. How long will it be before American companies are attacked in like fashion? (see story)

That aside what seems to be inevitable is the United States is going to sign over its sovereignty to foreign powers by its new left wing Democrat controlled government it will do this by signing into treaties like the Kyoto Protocol which will grant powers to the International Courts which will then have the authority to charge, convict and try U.S. Citizens for Environmental crimes.

Debra Saunders of the San Francisco Chronicle reporters that NASA director James Hansen, testified in the London court in September in support of the six eco-vandals of Greenpeace. A jury then acquitted the six Greenpeace activists of charges of vandalizing a British coal-fired power plant based on the "lawful excuse" defense that their use of force would prevent greater damage to the environment after Hansen predicted the one Kingsnorth plant could push 400 species into extinction.

The Theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming has neither been proved nor accepted by all scientist yet if internationalist like Stephen Hockman and Global warmist James Hansen have their way they will use the momentum that the false cry of cataclysmic anthropogenic Global warming has generated as a excuse to create an One World Government.

The Global Warming Petition Project urges Washington to reject the Kyoto international global warming pact because there is "no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate. So far, the Politico reports, more than 31,000 scientists have signed it.—Debra J. Saunders

And there is no better time to do this then now that the United States is on board with their new Eber-Liberal government headed by Global warming supporter President elect Barack Obama.

The Office of the President-Elect

The President elect and appointees Treasury Secretary-designate Timothy Geithner, Council of Economic Advisers and Chair-designate Christina Romer to his Economic Team

Question, from where did, “The Office of the President Elect derive? Seriously I’ve been combing the Constitution and I haven’t been able to find it. In addition to that no one in American history has acted as President elect Obama is. Its as if he’s already assumed power with his cool new light blue Office of the president elect placard.

That’s because there is no office of the President Elect. According to the Constitution Mr. Obama will not officially be the President Elect until the Electoral College convenes after the second Wednesday in December, December 10th, and elects him based on the results of the Nov. 4 general election as stated in the Constitution. (see story)

He [president Bush] will be the president until January 20th. However, giving--given, really, the daunting challenges that we face, it's important that President-elect Obama is prepared to really take power and begin to rule day one. –Valerie Jarrett

Obama spokes person Valerie Jarrett, co chair of the Obama transition team explains that we only have one president at a time on Meet the Press with Tom Brokaw. Ms. Jarrett also seems to think that president elect Obama will begin to “rule” on January 20, 2009. Note to Ms. Jarrett presidents govern Kings and Dictators rule! (see MTP transcript)



So what in the Hell is Barack Obama doing parading about like he has some official capacity? It is all to create an illusion of power. It seems that Mr. Obama has studied from the 48 laws of power and has enacted these laws in this campaign and is now using them in his transition. (see laws)

You are seeing before your eyes a political operation predicated on a set of Laws of Power and control that many nefarious leaders have used to form States whose functioning was a result of the ability of leaders to dupe the masses!

As Greene states, it is all about ILLUSIONS! And who is the creator of these illusions? David Axelrod, Chief Strategist of the Obama Campaign, who has followed Greene’s text to the letter.—No Quarter

President elect Obama is creating what all past dictators have created in previous fascist state rules, an air or appearance of complete control and power.

The authority that Obama is using to be able to do this is called The presidential Transition Act created in 1963 and amended in 2000. The transition act establishes formal provisions for the transition period by outlining training and other assistance that the president-elect and his team of advisers can receive as they prepare to assume office and under Section 3(a)(7)(c) it also provides that Mr. Obama can be called the president elect. (see Act)

Under this Act President elect Obama has received 12 million dollars for transitioning into the presidency and he is given the authority to set up his administration but outside of that he has no real power. He has only the illusion of power which the media is all too happy to grant him.

Yeah Ms. Jarrett maybe you are correct President elect Obama will be ready to RULE on day one!

Obama’s first Official steps down the Orwellian Road

President-elect Barack Obama, second from the right, introduces his economic team during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 24, 2008, in Chicago. From left are, Treasury Secretary-designate Timothy Geithner, Council of Economic Advisers Chair-designate Christina Romer, and National Economic Council Director-designate Lawrence Summers.

…to hold simultaneously two opinions which canceled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy…-- George Orwell, 1984

It has begun as I have predicted it would and those in the media don’t even know what has befallen them. Welcome to the Orwellian world of the left where contradiction is as natural as speaking. Oh I attempted to warn you that electing Barack Obama would be the end to meaning and language as we know it but apparently you didn’t care or you just didn’t understand.

Allow me to show you one quick instance of what we will be seeing throughout the four years of a President Obama’s administration.

A recent headline reports: Obama promotes fiscal restraint, big spending, reported by Associated Press reporter JIM KUHNHENN

In his report Kuhnhenn lays out that President-elect Barack Obama wants to project fiscal restraint even as his economic team assembles a massive recovery package that could cost several hundred billion dollars. (see story)

These are two mutually exclusive goals which contradict yet according to Kuhnhenn, “The dual images - big spender and disciplined budget watcher - were designed to give both political and economic assurances to the public, the Congress and the financial markets.”

Yes it's called doublethink! One thing for sure in the coming years we will see plenty of created dual images and hear an abundance of dual messages, all mutually exclusive and all contradictory meaning that they could not possibly be true.

Yet those of us who are Obama Proles will cast all logic to the wind and believe in the image and in the creation which is President Barack Obama and when we come to our rational minds (if we come to our rational minds) it will be to late.

We will have left America for Oceania and we all will be the Proles. (see video 10mins)



Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama, Obama…