Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Obama’s Original Birth Certificate has been Destroyed



Barack Hussein Obama’s long-form birth certificate no longer exists! It was destroyed in 2001 when Hawaii went paperless. This startling revelation was reported by Joseph Farah, founder, editor and CEO of Worldnetdaily.com in his article questioning whether or not the story regarding Obama’s eligibility is still relevant.

Farah reports that CNN researchers contacted the Hawaii Public Health Department about the missing long-form birth certificate and they were told that the original no longer exists. According to Farah Hawaiian authorities’ story to CNN was that it was destroyed in 2001 when Hawaii went paperless. (see story)

If this is true then Hawaii Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino lied when she claimed in October 2008 that she personally inspect the original birth certificate. Not to mention that the Annenberg organization Factcheck.org also lied when it claimed as early as August 2008 that their staffers had seen, touched , examined and photographed the original birth certificate. Neither of these incidents could be true if the Hawaii Public Health Department is now saying that the original birth certificate was destroyed in 2001. (see Fukino’s statement below):
For Immediate Release: October 31, 2008

STATEMENT BY DR. CHIYOME FUKINO
"There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obama's official birth certificate. State law (Hawai'i Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record.

"Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai'i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai'i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama's original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.

"No state official, including Governor Linda Lingle, has ever instructed that this vital record be handled in a manner different from any other vital record in the possession of the State of Hawai'i."
(source)
The Annenberg Foundation is a Chicago based organization with connections to Obama and that supports Obama. They also employed Obama at one time. Here they argue against those who say Obama's birth certificate is a fraud. (See Annenberg’s statement on their facts check page below):
August 21, 2008
Updated: November 1, 2008

...We beg to differ. FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal or a signature are false. We have posted high-resolution photographs of the document as "supporting documents" to this article. Our conclusion: Obama was born in the U.S.A. just as he has always said.
(see source)
This development does not help Obama rather it hurts him. If the document that was reportedly under lock and key and has been the center of the most intense scrutiny all of this time is reported suspiciously destroyed and this is the same document that several individual sources said that they saw in 2008 while it was yet under lock and key Barack Hussein Obama has a problem if now it is reported destroyed in 2001.

The fact is Barack Obama can not prove that he meets the constitutional requirement that he is a Natural Born Citizen of the United States of America.

So therefore he is deemed ineligible to serve and act as President of the United States of America and to the extent that he is not removed from office by impeachment during his first term there is no possible chance that he will be reelected if he attempted to seek a second term.

4 comments:

  1. I love that baby picture!. ROFL LMAO!
    The socialists critisized Bush for
    eight years, now it is their turn.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous8:06 AM

    The paper copy was destroyed. The record of his birth is electronically archived. No one is lying. No story here.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anon,
    Now CNN is retracting their claim. They now say that the original was not destory see link.

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105233

    What this means is someone needs to filter through all of the controversy concerning Obama's eligilibility.

    Bottom line there is a story here!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Here’s Obama’s dilemma in a nutshell (READ VERY CAREFULLY AND DIGEST):

    If BHO shows his original long form birth certificate, indeed showing he was born in Hawaii, it will also show his father was American citizen, Frank Marshall Davis, not the Kenyan/British citizen, Barack Obama Sr. While that would allow Barack Jr. to be POTUS eligible as BOTH a “citizen”/“native born citizen” AND an Article 2 “natural born citizen” — that is, born to two American citizens on American soil — it would simultaneously show he is a fraud hiding his real father — an unacceptable political debacle.

    If, on the other hand, BHO keeps hiding his original long form birth certificate — while simply repeating, without showing, he was born in Hawaii — he can still CLAIM BOTH he was born in Hawaii AND his father was the Kenyan/British Barack Obama Sr. This would enable Barack Jr. to claim he’s a “citizen”/“native born citizen” but it would mean (if a federal court would ever get around to declaring and thus far no one has standing to bring the suit) that he’s NOT an Article 2 “natural born citizen” and thus not eligible to be POTUS — a legal/constitutional debacle since all acts under an illegal POTUS are void.

    So it seems, BHO has elected option one until forced to go option two because for now it looks like no federal court will ever find a plaintiff with standing. (Of course, there’s the additional issue of BHO losing American citizen status if/when he became an Indonesian citizen — that is, IF he returned and was naturalized he would be a legal citizen, but would lose both native and natural born status, and, IF he returned and was not naturalized, he would be an illegal immigrant unlawfully in this country — but we’ll leave that for another day.)

    ReplyDelete