Slate's Agenda

What could possibly be more comedic than a bunch
of crowing liberals? I’ll tell you! A bunch of
cowering liberals, afraid that some unnamed, virtually
unknown conservative might put them in their place
...... with FACTS.......... something that they seem
completely helpless against!

I posted to Slate for years, under my assumed name,
and took heat from the best that the cowards could
muster, usually four and five at a time. Still, I
managed to stand my ground, when Slate was run
by men with integrety. For the past year or so, I saw
many a good pal banned from the site for speaking
his or her mind, for the sole reason that it didn’t
conform to the leftist regime’s "approved" agenda
of blindly accepting any liberal thought, and instantly
destroying any conservative one.

Recently, I posted some simple common sense
opinion, which was just too much for the leftists
to handle, and so I was shouted down by a bunch
of over-inflated, self-important, bullies, who
refused to have any dissent whatsoever on "their
" Slate. One puppet responded to ANY post that I
made with the words, "ban the troll"............ since
his limited capacity and total lack of facts left him
with nothing to fight with. Not an unusual thing for
a liberal to begin with........... to a liberal Slate poster,
it is commonplace..

Eventually, he garnered the support of several more
drones, who called for my banning, and lo and
behold, the next time I visited Slate,, all my previous
posts had disappeared, and I got the message that my
new post had not been accepted for publication. Slate
offered only the explanation that if I wanted to
question WHY it wasn’t posted, or why I had been
banned, I should email "this" address. Needless to say
that there is no way on this earth, that ANY post makes
it to a non-existent addy.

Of course I never got the opportunity to challenge the
editors of Slate to produce even one shred of evidence
as to the inappropriateness of any of my posts............
..... except maybe for the fact that they are totally
incapable of responding to a single one.

Well Slate...........you can continue on your puppet
training run by killing dissent and purging any posts
that oppose your opinion. That does not make you a
winner by any standard, nor does it make a site that
encourages discourse and discussion. In your infinite
"wisdom" you may blow your own horn, claim
fairness, and practice prejudice, but when all is said
and done, it merely shows that your thinking and your
typing postures are identical.

brooklyn

The No Confidence Congress

(L-R) US Senators Mel Martinez, Lindsey Graham and Ted Kennedy (AFP/Chip Somodevilla)

It's like a punchline in a bad joke. Whose approval ratings are lower than President Bush’s? Why Congress’ are!

Congress’ approval ratings are at a low, low 29% now that’s a vote of no confidence from the American people.


It spite of recent polls showing America's no confidence in this Congress, this group of Bush hating political opportunists are set to stage a vote of no confidence in the Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.


Having no evidence of wrong doing against Mr. Gonzales this Democratic controlled Congress has resorted to attempting to shame the attorney general from office. Gonzales should not step down. To bad that Democrats have no shame.

Senator Feinstein would be shamed for the “Milcon” Iraq war profiteering Scandal, Speaker Pelosi would be shamed for the recent San Francisco $15 billion Water Resources Development Act scandal, Rep. John Murtha would be shamed for the Abscam scandal and his recent House ethics rules scandal and Senator Harry Reid would be shamed for $30,500 Jack Abramhoff related moneys, his land deals and his recent the “war is lost” pronouncement while our troops are in harms way scandals.

But, irony of ironies a Congress the American people has no confidence in is going to vote that they have no confidence in AG Alberto Gonzales.

Why that’s like former Clinton National Advisor Sandy Berger announcing that he has no confidence in our National Archives’ security. (Now that’s funny!)

What’s next the Congress deciding that they have no confidence in President Bush? Oh that’s right they’ve already done that. Or that they have no confidence in our soldiers at war in Iraq? I’m pretty sure that failure to fund them while they’re in the field of battle is as close to a vote of no confidence as you can give them Speaker Pelosi and Senator Reid!

This is political buffoonery of the highest sorts; Democrats are in no position to be voting no confidence in anyone. 64% of American’s don’t approve of Congress' job performance. If Democrats wish to vote for something let them vote for equipping and supplying funding for our soldiers and send a war funding bill to the President before Congress goes on vacation for Memorial Day recess so that our troops will not be fighting unfunded in Iraq.

Senators I hate to break it to you but there is a reason that used car salesmen enjoy more popularity than the U.S. Congress right now and though you Democrats have worked so hard to drag the President’s popularity down even he is polling higher than Congress.

So go ahead and have your little meaningless vote just know that this Congress is no longer trusted by the American people. That’s right; America has no confidence in you Congress!

It must feel good to know that those of you who tried have accomplished your goal of destroying the people’s faith in their government and look it only took you eight years in which to do it!

Congress you’all must be so proud!

Who's Destroying America?

A song by the Milton Friedman Choir

Video Link

Corporate tyranny the one tyranny that the founding fathers failed to protect us against. As well corporations are the ultimate purveyor of Orwellian Worldview!

Bush and Congress Commit Identity Thief

Today Americans are plagued by the phenomenon of criminals who steal their names, numbers and personal information to gain access to their money and personal accounts, identity thief but no criminal has been able to steal what President Bush and certain members of Congress have just agreed to steal, they have agreed to steal the identity of a nation,the American National Identity.

The President and Congress have agreed to grant 12 to 20 million Mexican Nationals all of the rights and privileges of natural born Americans. These Mexican Citizens will be able to work; vote and change the social-political landscape of America and for that President Bush, certain key Republicans and a Democratic controlled Congress are patting themselves on the back like they’ve done a good thing. The President says that this legislation will treat people with respect however it fails to treat 301.1million already American citizens and their ancestors with any respect.

What this legislation is bound to do Mr. President and you few Republican Congressmen who brokered this deal is to ensure that Hillary Clinton will be the next President of the United States. Republicans will not support this latest blatant disregard for the rule of law in America no matter how many bows you put on this bad legislation.

301.1 Million Americans will have the most sacred trust stolen from them if the President and his co-conspirators have their way. And what is that trust, it is protection from foreign invasion. For two years Mexican foreign invaders and their enablers marched in the streets of America while waving Mexican flags and demanded rights that the constitution only guarantees to citizens of these United States. For years foreign nationals have been breaking American laws while increasing their numbers and stealing the sacred trust that Americans gave their lives for. Americans died for America and Americans.

President Bush has enabled this lawlessness encouraging illegality by offering what he calls Comprehensive Immigration Reform and suggesting that the current laws are broken.

However the current laws are NOT broken as the President would have Americans to believe what is broken in the political will of politicians like the President and the few weak kneed Republicans and their Democrat cohorts who for reasons that will soon be revealed have disrespected over 301.1 Million Americans by making being an American something that you can steal and then pay for on the installment plan.

For a country that is supposed to be nation of laws we have become a nation that changes its laws at the whim of elected representatives who no longer represent the interest of the citizens of the United States of America. This whole ugly breaking of American immigration laws, stealing of American’s identity by selling American citizenships to Mexican nationals is repugnant. These Mexican citizens have no allegiance to the flag, the institutions of this country or this country’s customs, they are here to take from America, they take her resources and send those resources back to a corrupt broken country which will never be corrected because no effort is directed to change what is broken in Mexico all political efforts are focused on changing what is NOT broken in America.

If the President is successful his comprehensive immigration reform act or (CIRA) will fix what is not broken in America and as a result of CIRA America will be as broken as Mexico is now. Here‘s why:

The proposed agreement would allow illegal immigrants to come forward and obtain a "Z visa" and - after paying fees and a $5,000 fine - ultimately get on track for permanent residency, which could take between eight and 13 years. Heads of households would have to return to their home countries first.
They could come forward right away to claim a probationary card that would let them live and work legally in the U.S., but could not begin the path to permanent residency or citizenship until border security improvements and the high-tech worker identification program were completed.
A new crop of low-skilled guest workers would have to return home after stints of two years. They could renew their visas twice, but would be required to leave for a year in between each time. If they wanted to stay in the U.S. permanently, they would have to apply under the point system for a limited pool of green cards.—JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS, WASHINGTON (AP)

However CIRA as now written provides for three categories of status for Mexican Nationals.
1. Temporary Status: Persons in this category enter the U.S. temporarily and are required to leave after a period of time.

2. Near-Permanent, Convertible Status: Persons in this category enter the U.S. and are given the opportunity to “adjust” or convert to legal permanent residence after a few years.

3. Legal Permanent Residence (LPR): Persons in this category have the right to remain in the United States for their entire lives. After five years, they have the right to naturalize and become citizens. As naturalized citizens, they have the constitutional rights to vote and to receive any government benefits given to native-born citizens.

CIRA and existing immigration law is that immigrants in convertible or LPR status have the right to bring spouses and minor children into the country. Spouses and dependent children will be granted permanent residence along with the primary immigrant and may also become citizens. In addition, after naturalizing, an immigrant has the right to bring his parents into the U.S. as permanent residents with the opportunity for citizenship. There are no numeric limits on the number of spouses, dependent children, and parents of naturalized citizens that may be brought into the country. Additionally, the siblings and adult children (along with their families) of naturalized citizens and the adult children (and their families) of legal permanent residents are given preference in future admission.

What the numbers really represent is that 12 to 20 million Mexican Citizens can eventually metastasize into 100million to 300million Mexican citizens who have the same rights to vote as Americans but who have completely different loyalties and purposes.

These people will have no sense of the heritage of this country and no reason to keep and protect it. The strongest argument for that claim is that they have not kept or protected their own country so why would they protect America?

The truth is Americans who will not do as much to protect their country as Mexican Nationals will do to take America will lose this country through complacency.

20million Mexican Nationals, the President, Congress and others are conspiring to devalue your rights and your citizenship. Mexican Nationals are already voting in this country. If you won’t march in the streets, like the brazen lawbreakers of Mexico, then maybe you will email the Republican Congressmen who are responsible for selling your American rights to foreign nationals. Take time to do it now!

John McCain
Arlen Specter
Jon Kyl
Lindsey Graham
Chuck Hagel
Mel Martinez
Saxby Chambliss and
Johnny Isakson

Tell these Senators that you will not vote for them if Mexican Citizens are granted amnesty for breaking America’s immigration laws and you will not vote for them if they make it possible for 20million to became 300 million Mexican Nationals who to be granted rights that have hereto been the birthright of Americans citizens. These Senators need to know that most American believe that Comprehensive Immigration Reform is amnesty no matter how it is phrased.

Tell your Senators that they are committing identity thief by take your American rights and privileges and giving those rights to undeserving Mexican citizens who have broken our laws. It is identity thief of America’s National Identity and identity thief is punishable by law and voting Congressmen out of office!

Welcome brooklyn

I have invited my long time posting buddy brooklyn to join me. I believe that you will enjoy his insights and perspective on current events and political news.

We are at a cricitial juncture in our nation one in which we must be vigilant and protect the hertiage which maded this country great.

Here's hoping for a long and productive relationship. Welcome brooklyn!

Pelosi Breaks the House

Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi

She’s only been in power for about 4 months but like a bull in a China cabinet she has managed to break up the already frayed working relationships in the House of Representatives.

Frustrated that the House is not a dictatorship Nancy Pelosi signaled that she would act to make it one and in an outrageous authoritarian act moved to change House rules that have been in place since 1822.

The house rules that Pelosi as decided to change are current House rules regarding the minority party’s right to the Motion to recommit or the test of germaneness on the motion to recommit.

It is called the Germaneness Rule, which gives the minority party the ability to challenge provisions in a bill on the floor. What this rule does is it insures that the no bill is brought up for vote in the House that the minority has not been able to read

According to the Drudge Report this Pelosi’s decision to change the 185-year rule developed after Democrats continued to lose a string of embarrassing votes on the House floor because of procedural maneuvering. Democrats had bragged that a new Congress was in town and things were going to be different.

So according to Drudge Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has decided to change the current House Rules to completely shut down the floor to the minority. Dictatorship instead of democracy I’d say that, that is definitely different Ms. Pelosi!

Mind you, the Democrats were in the minority recently for twelve years and the Republican Majority did not even think to enact such a draconian measure.

“This is an astonishing attempt by the majority leadership to duck accountability for tax-and-spend policies the American people do not want.”

“The majority leadership is gutting House rules that have been in place for 185 years so they can raise taxes and increase government spending without a vote.” -- House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio)

Pelosi has shown panache to travel halfway across the world to speak with enemies of the United States, it is indeed surprising that she cannot negotiate or talk to fellow American Congresspersons.

No doubt Democrats would be crying through the media if the situation were reversed and the media would be calling the Republicans the second coming of the third Reich but this Democrat deconstruction of American democracy will be reported as a mere bending of the rules by the Democrats at the least or some Republican threat to shut down the government at worst.

Understand that this act by a Pelosi lead Democrat control House of Representatives is typical of a tyrannical and ideological run political party that wishes to force its beliefs on the American people at the cost of destroying the American institution of democracy in order to achieve the Democrat’s goal of power and control in America.

After two elections France and Germany are America’s Friends again

President George W. Bush and German Chancellor Angela Merkel

In his victory speech, Sarkozy said he wanted to tell his "American friends that they can rely on our friendship ... France will always be next to them when they need us."

Gone is Germany’s former Chancellor Gerhard Schröder and leaving is France’s lame duck President Jacques Chirac and foreign relations with America are on the mend.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President-elect Nicolas Sarkozy have both extended a hand of friendship to President Bush.

It is quite ironic how these two countries attempted to unite with Russia to economically trash the United States of America are now under new leadership and now their foreign policy is to distance themselves from Russia and embracing President Bush.

The French have put their money on a politician who has always vowed to radically and swiftly liquidate France's historic mortgage -- the civil servant apparatus, the privileges of teachers and social workers, and the influence of the unions.

During a recent visit to the United States German Chancellor Angela Merkel rejected Senator Hillary Clinton’s request for a breakfast meeting. The German President did not desire to be entangled in US domestic politics which is a clear sign that our allies and not anti-Bush!

The astonishment over Angela Merkel is all the more immense when one considers that she has not only managed to tromp across the world's red carpets without mishaps, but, in the short time of her chancellorship, she has also taken the country back to where it belongs -- at America's side.

To be clear, the world, after experiencing the failed policies of the left, is shifting to the right and as usual the America Left is behind the world movement with its radical movement to the far political left.

America would do good to heed the lessons learned from France and Germany, countries which railed against America with their leftist leaders in place but extraordinarily these countries have rejected those leaders and have come back to the United States in friendship.

This is but a reminder of what a disaster American politics would be in if in spite of the examples of France and Germany the American people elected leftists such as the Democrats.

Democrats hold the same old antiquated ideologies that the European left formerly held and is now running from.

France and Germany’s recent turn to the right will be the remedy to most of their ills and if in 2008 America chooses to turn to the left we will once again hear those immoral words, “How can 57 million people be so stupid!”

But, this time those words will be right!

Democrat controlled Congress approval level lower than the President’s

New Direction? Yes try tanking in the polls. It’s the old saw if you throw dirt on people you got to get some dirt thrown on you! And boy have the Democrats been throwing dirt!

President Bush is polling at a steady 33% approval rating where as the Dems who see themselves as representative of the people of the Blue States of America are polling at 29% according to Gallup polls.

Even though Democrats now control both houses of Congress, the poll shows that only 37% of Democrats approve of the job Congress is doing right now. These marks are, however, significantly better than those given to Congress by independents (24%) and Republicans (25%).

That’s right even Democrats say that Democrats stink! Why, only 39% of Democrats approve of the job that the Democratic controlled Congress is doing.


Democrats New Direction – Gridlock

What has highly touted first 100 days of Democrat controlled Congress produced? War. Oh not the Iraqi war, heck even though a majority of Democrats voted to give the President authority to go to war against Iraq, these partisan warriors are not as ferocious against the ideologues and Islamist who vow to destroy America, no these 21st century grey coat soldiers are attempting to stop America’s progress against terrorism by first declaring that the Iraqi war is lost (for purely political reasons) hoping to gain power in America by losing the Iraq war and then place blame on a conservative President.

However there is a war that Democrats are interested in and are willing fight that war is the war against President Bush and Conservatives.

Democrats believe that they have a mandate from the Blue States of America to wage a civil war against Red States America and now that they have a platform from which to launch their social scud missiles against the so-called religious zealots of the Red States let’s step back to understand what it would mean to have Democrats in total power in the United States.

In the first 100 hours of their House leadership, Democrats pushed through a domestic agenda of six measures -- dubbed the "Six for 'O6" -- including elevating the minimum-wage increase, funding stem-cell research, funding alternative energy development, implementing the recommendations of the September 11 commission, changing Medicare's drug plan and cutting student loan interest rates.

A new direction? No it’s more like gridlock, none of the Democrats mandate for change has become law and three face a presidential veto.

Speaking of veto the party which “supports the troops” forced a Presidential Veto of the War funding bill by filling it with excess domestic spending and troop withdraw timelines.

Democrat party radicals probably think it pretty cool that they can fight with the President over who has the political power in the United States. And at the same time they’re using the American troops in the field like a rope in a game of tug-0-war.

From $400.00 haircuts to larger Airforce one planes befitting of the new Speaker of the House’s jounts from San Francisco to Washinton to Syria (in violation of the Logan Act) the Democrats are showing America just what a crazy place America would be if the puerile and paranoid Democrats where fully in control of America.

What did we learn from the French?

Nicolas Sarkozy, France's newly-elected President

Just because you’re a woman doesn’t mean that you deserve to be President!

And Liberals are liars all over the world. Are just a few things that we learned from the French. They even used their own version of “anybody but Bush”, their version was, “tous sauf Sarkozy" (anyone but Sarkozy) which by the way didn’t work there either.

But, Honey chid… you think Hillary noticed that the French socialist Segolene Royal who ran almost exclusively on her feminist credentials only received 48 percent of the female vote in France’s Presidential elections Sunday.

Some women said Royal, a mother of four, had focused too much on the symbolism linked to becoming France's first female president. Does any of this sound familiar?

"Just because you're a feminist, you don't vote for a woman who does not have the ability. We're talking about the presidential election here ... It's too serious to link this to a phenomenon of femininity or feminism," said Tita Zeitoun, founder of the Action de Femme group which fights to get more women into top business positions.

First lesson, people of a country that would elect a Presidential candidate on the basis of gender or popularity are not even as smart as the French!

Ironically French president-elect Nicolas Sarkozy a combative conservative, won a strong mandate for political and economic change by winning 53.06 percent of the vote in Sunday's presidential run-off against 46.94 for Socialist Segolene Royal. In a world and a country were conservatism is supposed to be dead a conservative won.

All jelly-kneed American conservatives need to take note. Continue with the, “Can’t we just all get along,” Democrat boot licking and you all will be looking for new jobs.

President Bush tried to get along with Democrats and they destroyed his Presidency. You want the backing of American conservatives show that you’re willing to fight for conservative principles or you give conservatives no reason to come out to vote in 2008.

Second lesson, moderate and liberal Conservatives need not apply. No more consorting with people who have declared you the enemy. The ideology of Conservatism is under attack and only someone who is willing to vigorously fight for conservative principles, with the same or greater willingness that Democrats have demonstrated, will be able to lead conservatives and win in 2008.

Finally Conservatives can not continue to stand back and allow the President or any fellow conservative to be lied on, disrespected or attacked as if the attacks are not meant for each and every Conservative. Conservatives must protect conservatives like Democrats protect one another.

There is a majority of Conservatives in this country that will vote for a fighting conservative. France is not an anomaly, France is a reminder that we have been lied to by the “Dan Rather” main stream media and Democrat politicos about the President, the war, the political state of this country. For 8 years Democrats have lied to the America people about everything!

France is the proof that a strong fighting Conservative can win against feminism, socialism and liberalism.

A Combative Conservative will fight for the principles of conservatism as the Democrats have fought for their beliefs. Anything else will bring different results than what was experienced by the French, anything less means America will be lost to people who hated on America, who have called truth lies and lies truth and who have pulled down America’s institutions for 8 years.

If Republicans have not taken note of the lessons demonstrated by French voters there will be a feminist socialist in the White house in 2008 and her name will not be Segolene Royal.

Pelosi Malfeasance Glossed over by Media

California corruption in the Senate of the United States is like California Sunshine; the sun is always shining in California so one learns to put on a sunscreen. Apparently California corruption is so glaringly obvious in the Senate that apparently the press has learned to put on sunshades in order to avoid reporting it.

The Press has done something like that with California Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi and California Senator Dianne Feinstein, instead of investigating allegations of California Democratic U.S. legislator corruption the press simple glosses over any possible story as just another Republic attempt to “stir up controversy.”

When is the last time that you read a story regarding Republicans that started off, “Democrats are accusing Republicans of…” like the one by Erica Werner in the Washingtonpost?

Or do you remember reading any day to day accounts in the press of Senator Dianne Feinstein’s multi-million dollar self enrichment conflict of interest when she was chairperson and ranking member of the Military Construction Appropriations subcommittee (MILCON) from 2001 through the end of 2005. Feinstein supervised the appropriation of billions of dollars a year for specific military construction projects.

Two defense contractors whose interests were largely controlled by her husband, financier Richard C. Blum, benefited from decisions made by Feinstein as leader of this powerful subcommittee. Feinstein enriched herself by millions of dollars and at tax payers expense, did you read about any of this?

No you didn’t because MSM doesn’t investigate Democrat corruption it only exposes Republican wrong doing.

Speaking of corruption, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi who engineered the 2006 sweep of Republican Senators and Congressmen based on her mantra “A Culture of Corruption” which was incidentally borrowed from the 1994 Newt Gingrich Contract with America has been caught attempting to enrich herself just like her colleague Senator Dianne Feinstein. Instead of being the new sheriff in town that she promised Pelosi is more like a bandit with a badge. But instead of the press investigating Pelosi and Feinstein they are attempting to provide cover for these Democrats.

Here’s what we know now; in a $15 billion dollar Water Resources Development Act that passed the House in April, House Speaker Pelosi slipped a $25 million dollar measure into the bill that would affect her home, the San Francisco port area about 1 mile away from four rental properties owned by her husband.

Pelosi’s cover story is that she added the $25 million dollar project to the $15 billion dollar bill at the request of the Port of San Francisco.

Is this a baseless attack by Republicans? Or is this Democratic Culture of Corruption that the press won’t investigate?

Pelosi’s promises of cleaning up the culture of corruption in Washington D.C. places her to a higher standard, she above anyone should understand that she couldn’t afford even the appearance of a conflict of interest so early on in her period in office unless of course she feels that she doesn't have to fear that anyone in the media would expose her.
Since Pelosi became speaker in January she has violated the Logan Act with her trip to Syria, forced a Presidential Veto of the War funding bill that she filled with excess domestic spending and troop withdraw timelines and now this $25 million dollar project which she could personally benefit from.

Yet, we get more coverage of the missing Natalie Holloway and the deceased Anna Nicole Smith than we’ve received of Congresswoman Pelosi’s misdeeds on Capitol Hill.

MSM has dropped all pretense regarding objectively and fairness in reporting when you see a headline like, “GOP Criticizes Pelosi’s…” or a story start by saying, “Republicans are accusing…” you pretty much know that the report or the news service is not presented in an objective, fair or responsible matter.

Republicans are Not Ready to Make Nice Compromise

Compromise used to mean that half a loaf was better than no bread. Among modern statesmen it really seems to mean that half a loaf; is better than a whole loaf. --Gilbert Keith Chesterton (1874-1936) British journalist, novelist and poet.

Compromise makes a good umbrella, but a poor roof; it is temporary expedient, often wise in party politics, almost sure to be unwise; in statesmanship. --James Russell Lowell (1819-1891) American poet, critic and editor.

Interestingly the latest advice to Republicans coming from Liberals is in order to win elections you must compromise your values. That is the gist of the Daniel Finkelstein Times online piece. That is exactly what Liberals would want Conservatives to do which is also one of the crucial differences between the two political philosophies.

Liberals believe that Conservatives should compromise Conservative values in order to win elections because those values are wrong, unyielding and inflexible. Though Liberals would never compromise their, written in stone, core issues Roe, Homosexuality or the War.

Yet there is a Liberal belief that Republicans must compromise conservative values before Republicans will appeal to the independent voters that Liberals managed to peel away from Conservatives in the 2006 mid-term elections. Wait a minute don’t panic just yet!

That idea is completely at odds with Conservative ideology. If Conservativism is the adherence to the traditional and to the status quo, then to change or compromise would be… would make Conservatives no better than Liberals who believe that any compromise is worthy if the desired goal or goals are achieved.

Liberals did many things to Compromise their own ideologies in the 2006 elections. They run Democrat “Conservative” war veteran candidates against Republican incumbents. These so-called Democrat “Conservatives” promised to support the war if elected however after being elected into office they proved that it was all a lie. They actually supported Pelosi’s and Reid’s farce of a war funding bill which declares legislatively as Senator Harry Reid announced to al Qaeda and the world, “The war is lost!” That is the real meaning behind the pull out dates attached to the bill that was sent to the President by partisan Democrats. “The war is lost.”

The President immediately dispatched the “cut and run” bill with a veto. Democrats argue that it wasn’t cut and run it was actually cut and walk because of the dates requiring a slow pull down of troops. One thing one has to admit and that is Democrats do have a sense of humor, playing around with American troops funding, now that’s just hilarious.

I bet the troops think it’s down right slap stick the way President Nancy Pelosi and Vice President Harry Reid of the Blue states of America are sticking it to President Bush of the United States of America, after all that’s what the people wanted when they elected Democratic control of Congress right?

It ought to be a real laugh riot when Democratic playing around with troop funding results in lack of supplies and or armament for our fighting personnel on the front line in Iraq.

Conservatives must disregard Liberal’s attempts to call for change in Conservative ideology. If this advice was any good Liberal’s would have changed after their two major defeats in the 2000 and 2004 elections. The fact of the matter is they only changed strategy but they did not forsake any Liberal core ideology.

As for changing Conservative tactics and strategies try these:

Never let your opponent define the language and the terms of the debate.

Let no spurious charge go unanswered you never know what weak minded independent is listening

Remember politics is war

Come to fight and keep fighting because they are

Democrats are not your friends, countrymen or colleagues (well maybe they are your countrymen but just barely)

Just because a Democrat says that a Republican should step down from office doesn’t necessarily mean that he or she should

Democrats invented the politics of hate; don’t let anyone tell you otherwise

Any Republican voting along with Democrats is not a Republican

Co-operate with Democrats just like they co-operate with Republicans

Don’t worry about the moral high ground unless you can get a clear shot from there

Democrats will always view kindness as weakness

Being called a liar by a Democrat is like being called a liar by the Clintons

Don’t try to be “better” than they are, answer each and every slander, insult and mischaracterizing with an equal and forceful slander, insult and mischaracterization of the Democrat and or his or her position

And never ever take advice from a Liberal on what Republicans need to do to win anything!

It wasn’t to long ago that Democrats and Liberals where wringing their hands wonder what they were going to do to gain power. The fact that they accomplished their goal in eight years without following any advice from Republicans is an indication that political trends are circular and that political fortune is serendipitous.

Voters have been mislead by the Democrat party over the last eight years and the only change needed is change to the hearts and minds of an electorate that has been duped by the politics of personal destruction and the politics of hate.

Voters simply need to be educated as to why their interests are best served by people who care for traditional values and keeping America safe and strong.

To panic now and jettison Conservative values just to garner a few votes will have long term effects and political office would make Conservatives no better than Democrats who have show themselves to be nothing more than political nappy headed hos who are willing to sell themselves out for votes and who manipulates circumstances and people for political gain.

It’s much too early to make nice and as Conservatives, it’s never time to compromise what we believe. It’s time to wake-up the hearts and minds of those who have been deceived by the racial far left.

Only with God’s help can we do it!

Citizens of Mexico Demand Rights in America

Here is some straight talk about the citizens of Mexico, who invaded American streets across this nation yesterday, on the one year anniversary marking the first showing of foreign anarchy in the streets of America. Mexican citizens demanded American rights and American privileges based on the rule of finders keepers. You know finders keepers, is the fact that Mexicans believe that because they managed to enter into this country illegally there is nothing that anyone should do about it. Mexicans have found a good thing and they’re determined to keep it!

What is now being called Comprehensive Immigration Reform is not that at all. What it is is changing America’s laws so that Global Capitalist can use Mexican citizens as cannon fodder for cheap labor right here in America.

This is the grand design of these Capitalist whose efforts are froth with greed for record profits. Their plan is to cut the cost of exporting jobs out of the United States by bringing (attracting) cheap labor into the U.S. a kind of bringing a mountain of people to a capitalist Mohammad.

It is much cheaper for Capitalist to attract cheap Mexican labor to America than to pull up stakes and rebuild in a foreign country that is economically and politically unstable. After all the safe dollars are here in America not in Mexico.

You probably thought that none of the discussions about illegal Mexican labor made any sense. How could Mexican foreign nationals think that they are entitled to rights in America? How could their American supporters think the same thing?

Yet it makes sense in light of fact that the American Government is aiding and abetting the felonious criminal enterprise of smuggling human cargo into America by willingly allowing the laws that govern entering this country to be broken. It is reported that the Government has prevented its own border patrol officers from carrying out the duties of protecting the border from this foreign invasion.

Comprehensive Immigration Reform will give the Government and Global Capitalist legal standing and the cover that they need. It’s becoming quite uncomfortable for them to continue to blatantly breaking their own Immigration laws so a comprehensive change of laws will do much to bring the appearance of legality to the 21st century slave trade that is the government’s Comprehensive Immigration Reform.

Incredibility Mexicans are perfectly willing to be bought and sold by coyotes and steal across the border via “el ferrocarril subterráneo.”

A life of slavishly low wages in America is 100 times better than a life in the failed corrupt country of their origin. Make no mistake the average Mexican that is spirited across the border is after one thing only. Money!

Citizenship for them or their children is but a ticket, a pass to come and go as they please they don’t really care about the health of the institutions of this country they are here to get paid. If worst came to worst and disaster were to befall America they’d be back in Mexico, the country of their allegiance before the smoke cleared.

Mexican citizens are not adopting America as their own, for example many are not even interested in learning our language and customs. Mexicans are using America, Capitalist are using Mexicans and the American people are being straight played as the masters of the commanding heights stratifies the American economic classes into two distinct and separate groups, upper class and lower class.

If twenty years ago someone would have prophesized that one day foreign nationals would be marching in the streets of America demanding the rights of American citizens while still holding allegiance to their country of origin you would have said, Yeah right when hell freezes over.

Well scientist have recently discovered that Global warming is attributable to climate change in hell and because of the severe freezing taking place there it is now hotter on the outside of the planet.

You believe that? Well if you can believe that citizens of Mexico deserve rights in America simply because they have managed to break and elude the laws regarding this nation’s sovereignty you just might believe that hell just froze over too!

At least they put away most of those ratty Mexican flags this year… now maybe they’ll learn the language.

Vergüenza de César Chávez

César Chávez would be ashamed of the demonstrations that are spread across the United States today because these protest are the antithesis of what his life work was all about.

Today’s rallies are meant to support illegal aliens who crossed into this country breaking the laws of this country and now are demanding that American laws be disregarded or changed to make their lives more comfortable. Yet many Americans are opposed to illegal entry into the United States.

However according to Steve Sailor, Chávez, for many years, was a ferocious opponent of illegal immigration.

In 1979, Chávez bitterly testified to Congress:
… when the farm workers strike and their strike is successful, the employers go to Mexico and have unlimited, unrestricted use of illegal alien strikebreakers to break the strike. And, for over 30 years, the Immigration and Naturalization Service has looked the other way and assisted in the strikebreaking. I do not remember one single instance in 30 years where the Immigration service has removed strikebreakers [illegal aliens]. … The employers use professional smugglers to recruit and transport human contraband across the Mexican border for the specific act of strikebreaking…

One wonders when the schools lovingly teach about César Chávez do they include that César fought against illegally entering the United States of America?

Steve Sailor further reports that, in 1969, Chávez led a march to the Mexican border to protest illegal immigration. Joining him were Sen. Walter Mondale and Martin Luther King’s successor as head of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, Ralph Abernathy.

Or again one wonders if the tales are ever told of Chávez’s organization The United Farm Workers that picketed INS offices to demand closure of the border. Chávez also [reported] on illegal alien scabs to la migra.

Columnist Ruben Navarrette Jr. reported in the Arizona Republic, “César Chávez, a labor leader intent on protecting union membership, was as effective a surrogate for the INS as ever existed. Indeed, Chávez and the United Farm Workers Union (UFW) he headed routinely reported, to the INS, for deportation, suspected illegal immigrants who served as strikebreakers or refused to unionize.”

According to Sailor, like today’s Minutemen, UFW staffers under the command of Chávez’s brother Manuel patrolled the Arizona-Mexico border to keep out illegal aliens. Unlike the well-behaved Minutemen, however, Chávez’s boys sometimes beat up intruders.

Today’s protest stands in complete opposition of what it is to be a freedom loving and law abiding American and only ignorance of the past and ignorance of American traditions would allow so many to openly lend support to the continuing criminal enterprise of smuggling people into the United States and those people setting up squatter rights as they claim this land for their home country by using our laws and our rights to help facilitate their invasion of this once sovereign nation.

For Americans that believe that it is too late to do anything to save America do not lose heart this issue was effectively dealt with before by President Dwight Eisenhower and it can be done again if you show your willingliness to fight for your country by voting for leadership that will protect America’s sovereignty.

Unlike the current sentiment everything is not free in America. There is a heavy cost being paid for this present illegal alien invasion, César Chávez knew it as all working Americans know it.


As illegal aliens and their supporters wave their flags of Mexico and America proudly this day, the irony is César Chávez would be ashamed of this day as he would be ashamed of the people who celebrate it!

Why aren’t Democrats taking any blame for Iraq?

Senator “The War is Lost” Harry Reid

It occurred to me as I watched the Democrats debate, for the nomination for their party to be President of the United States of America, that these candidates think that they can get away with not taking responsibility for the war in Iraq.

I give you that some of them did not vote for the war because they were not in the Senate at the time by the fact is their party did in remarkable numbers and Democrats can not just abdicate their responsibility in this chapter of American history.

Think about it, if all of the Democrats who blame the Bush administration for the war in Iraq would not have voted to give the President authority to invade Iraq we would not be in Iraq today. However Democrats did vote for the war and subsequently they have voted to fund the war so why is this in Democrat’s mind, “Bush’s war”

Simple answer is Democrats say this is Bush’s war because Democrats seized on the growing dissatisfaction with the war (part of which they manufactured for political purposes) they did this to engineer a winning political strategy against the Bush administration and Conservatives, which makes for good anti-Bush politics. As you know for eight years Democrats have obsessed on defeating George Bush and Conservatives.

The Red state Blue state divide that became so prominent in the 2000 and 2004 Presidential elections marked the beginning of the Civil war that is presently raging in this country, liberals against conservatives, Democrats against Republicans.

But what is unconscionable, I think, is that Democrat Presidential candidate hopefuls are allowed by the media and their constituents to disassociate themselves from their own personal choices to invade Iraq. Have we forgotten the –Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq— and the House and the Senate votes that authorized the war?

Yet Democrats continue to disingenuously claim that his or her vote for invading Iraq was Bush’s fault for whatever reason that Democrats make that claim, intelligent voters should rebuke it’s Bush’s fault arguments, why? Because not all Democrats voted for the war only those who chose too, so such claims should count as one more politician that does not take responsibility for his or her decisions. If some Democrats were not fooled by Bush then why were some?

Rather, any honest Politician would say, I voted for the war based on what we all thought was evidence to support such a vote. We now know that everyone based his or her decision to go to war on faulty intelligence information. Base on that we are all equally at fault.

The fact is there were plenty of Democrats who voted against the war. Out of nine Democrats who sat on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence deciding whether to recommend to the full body to go to war 5 voted for war and 4 did not.

For instance Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin, Illinois Democrat is now making the claim that he he knew that the American public was being misled into the Iraq war but remained silent because he was sworn to secrecy as a member of the intelligence committee. Durbin was not the only Democrat on that committee.

However, what Senator Durbin statement does is unwillingly support the Bush administration’s assertion that the Senate had the same information regarding the war as the administration did with which to base their decisions.

Mr. Durbin, said he and half the Democrats on the intelligence committee voted against the war over concerns of the White House's case for war. But what Mr. Durbin doesn’t tell you is that there were nine Democrats on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and five of them voted for the measure as did all eight Republicans to send recommendation to the entire body to vote for use of armed force against Iraq.

If as Senator Durbin contends, the White House’s case for war was not good then why did five Democrats vote to recommend to the Senate for war?

Think about it, if nine Democrats vote as Durbin did they out number eight Republicans and the authority for war in Iraq never gets out of committee. The fact is Democrats had the power to prevent this war all along. This is just as much the Democrats war as it is anyone elses.

Any Democrat that claim that he or she was deceived by the President about the war and that is why he or she voted for the war is merely a political opportunist and not worthy of voter support.

Congress authorized the 2003 use of armed force against Iraq by votes of 296-133 in the House and 77-23 in the Senate in a Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq. This is every bit the Congress’s war, the Democrats war and the people’s war.

So why aren’t the Democrats sharing in the blame?

Democratic Debate Made No Sense

From left: Mike Gravel, former U.S. senator from Alaska, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Ct., former Sen. John Edwards of South Carolina., Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson., and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio made the observation of the night when he said that it made no sense to oppose the war and then turn around and vote for more money to fund it.

Out of the eight presidential hopefuls that spent the initial moments of their first Democratic presidential primary debate blaming President Bush for the war in Iraq four candidates; Sen. Christopher Dodd, Sen. Joe Biden, Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. John Edwards all voted to give President Bush authority to invade Iraq four years ago.

And all Democrats House and Senate apparently except for Rep. Kucinich voted yesterday on a war funding bill that will be sent to the President early next week. Kucinich’s point strikes at the heart of Democratic hypocrisy. Yes indeed, what sense does it make to fund the war and at the same time say that you are against it?

Such is the case with Democrats who live in the nuanced world of conflicting positions and politics. Sens. Obama, Clinton, Biden and Dodd all cast votes yesterday in favor of funding the war in Iraq yet they all blame the President for the war.

Remember four of the candidates voted initially to invade Iraq and four of them voted to fund the continuation of the war yesterday yet Democrats feel perfectly comfortable criticizing the President while disassociating themselves from any responsibility for their decision to give authority to invade Iraq or their votes yesterday to continue to fund the war.

Inconsistent, makes no sense? Well of course this kind of “I voted for the war before I voted against it,” is a Democrat political essential. This is a formula that Democrats have invented, John Kerry clumsily attempt to invoke it in his Presidential bid of four year ago. When pressed on the fact that he voted against funding equipment for the troops. In Kerry’s famous nuanced way of putting things he said, “I actually voted for the $87 billion before I voted against it.”

One has to wonder, why such blatant inconsistencies are so acceptable to Democrat partisans when any Republican who’d had made similar statements before the press would be dragged before a Senate Judiciary hearing.

But alas if you are a Democrat you may always change your mind, change your position and you may always repent.

For instance, you need a $400 dollar hair cut? And you want to pay for it from campaign donations?

Well I won’t advise it if you are a Republican but if you happen to be a Democrat and if your name happens to be John Edwards why go ahead and get that trim, no problem. If you are ever asked about it just say, "That was a mistake, which we remedied," and all is forgiven. See how easily Democrat sycophants look pass partisan wrong doing?

Or did you ever notice how Democrats are so impressed with the labyrinthine phrasing of a clintonesque statement, one that starts in one directing but is so convoluted with legalese that when completed it is in absolute contradiction of its original intent? Slippery answers, words, phases and clauses refined and redefined to the point of surreal absurdity an example would be some of the candidates’ answers to a question about the Supreme Court.

The candidates were asked about the Supreme Court ruling that upheld a ban on partial birth abortions, many of them claimed that they would not impose a litmus test on their own nominees to the high court. But contradictorily, some of them stressed their support for abortion rights, and said their appointees to the bench would reflect that. So much for not imposing a litmus test and very clintonesque I must say.

In another example Dennis Kucinich challenged Barack Obama at one point for once having said all options were on the table with respect to Iran. "You're setting the stage for another war," the Ohio lawmaker said.

In Obama’s best clintonesque he shot back, "I think it would be a profound mistake for us to initiate a war with Iran," Obama replied. "But have no doubt, Iran possessing nuclear weapons will be a major threat to us and to the region."

Thus Obama was able to leave all options on the table with only the impression that he had addressed Kucinich’s concern.

If this debate portends to be what’s in store for the American people, if the Democrats win, we will not have learned anything in the last eight years of partisan attempts to make George Bush into a liar. We could be headed back to being governed by a Democrat party that made lying depend on what the meaning of is, is!

And that friend just doesn’t make any sense!

Bar the Constitution and Democrats will Speak

DNC Chair Howard Dean

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;--United States Constitution

The head of the Democratic Party said Wednesday that the best way to get presidential candidates to talk frankly about issues is to lock out the media. —Reported by AP Press

You have to wonder how anyone above a fourth grade education can be a Democrat or a Liberal that supports Democrat politics. Don’t these guys know anything about the Constitution?

As reported by the AP press DNC Chairman Howard Dean speaking before the Mortgage Bankers Association asserted that a media lock out would be the answer to get Democrats to speak candidly about the issues. So does that mean everything that we hear in the media spoken by a Democrat is…less than forthright?

Bar the press says Dean and hold closed meetings and Democrats will say all of the things that they’ve been holding back. Yeah things like, “The war is lost” a la Democrat Majority Leader Harry Reid? I wonder what Senator Reid was really thinking?

"The media has been reduced to info-tainment," Dean said. "Info-tainment sells, the problem is they reach the lowest common denominator instead of forcing a little education down our throats, which we are probably in need of from time to time."

Of course, You probably get your information from ABC, CBS or NBC or maybe you’re a hard-core information junkie and plug in to cable news, CNN, or MSNBC. Like many Americans you probably subscribe to the Times newspaper in your area but according the DNC chair you’re not as smart as you think!

As a matter of fact you are being info-tained and you are the “lowest common denominator” who has an aversion to education.

Just remember that the next time you attempt to debate the issues with an opponent and you cite your mainstream media sources. Democrat National Chairman Howard Dean says that your sources are stupid and so are you!

Hey which mainstream media network is carrying tonights Democrat Presidential Debates?

Just thought I’d ask … You know there’s always Fox News!

A Tale of Two American Presidents

President Nancy Pelosi and Vice President Harry Reid of the Blue States of America

Ms. Pelosi rammed legislation through the House of Representatives that would strip Mr. Bush of his authority as commander in chief to manage troop movements in Iraq. Now she is attempting to introduce a new Middle East policy that directly conflicts with that of the president. …Ms. Pelosi's attempt to establish a shadow presidency is not only counterproductive, it is foolish.—Washingtonpost.com

Are Democrats acting as if the 2006 mid-term elections which put both houses of Congress in their hands is a political coup? It sure appears like it. Especially when Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi announces that there’s a new Congress in town. She only stopped just short of taking on a Texas twang and declaring that this town ain’t big enough for the both of us President Bush. Guess Pelosi is leaving all the southern twanging to Hillary.

Then Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid up and declares that the war in Iraq is lost. Which was news to our troops in the middle of fire fights in Iraq. I can see the men now; between M-16 rounds, Hey John did you hear Senator Reid just announced that the war is lost. John answers back, Yeah I just show him on Al Jazzera TV in that last house we just checked.

To top it off Senator Reid had the audacity to call the sitting President delusional about the war in Iraq. Wait a minute you call a war lost which was handily won and you do this with fighting men in the field and you’re calling the President delusional? …Yeah right!

Speaking of delusion the Democrats challenge to President Bush’s legitimate constitutional war authority makes them a government unto themselves.
The last I looked this was a Democratic Constitutional Republic. One which the people elect a President and she or he leads the nation with support from a cabinet of congressional approved administrators meant to conducts the affairs of state.

However there as been phenomena developing in this country as late as the 2000 presidential elections which is made more distinct by a closely divided House of Representatives and a closely divided Congress, that phenomena has been Democrats acting as if their political defeats entitled them to half of the political power in America.

Democrat behavior has been unprecedented in the way that they have demand equal time with the President of the United States so much so that they have created a dual leadership situation that has only been seen in America once before.

This situation is even more apparent now that Democrats control both the Congress and the House of Representatives. Democrats more than ever are acting as if they share a co- Presidency with President George Bush.

The Speaker of the House who is third in succession to the Presidency has demanded a larger Government Jet to jet her to and from her home in San Francisco and Washington D.C., a kind of Air Force plus 1.

If you haven’t noticed we are now functioning as two governments one controlled by President Nancy Pelosi the first woman President of the United States and her Vice President Senator Harry Reid. And the second legitimate government of President George Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.

Not since President Jefferson Davis of the Confederate States of America challenged President Abraham Lincoln has the United States had two Presidents simultaneously.

Democrats have effectively split the Government of the United States of America and now acting as Democrat President Nancy Pelosi along with her Vice President Harry Reid are governing a shadow government as an anti-Bush government alternative.

President Pelosi has made her first official diplomatic trip to Syria signaling that there is a new foreign policy in the United States and is planning her next trip to Iran.

Her Vice President Harry Reid has declared that he represents the people of the United States and the elected President, President Bush doesn’t. And to prove his point Democrats have decided to send President Bush legislation that will micro manage the war and then set a date to cut and run, establishing a dual Commander-in-Chief situation,between President Bush and the Democratic controlled Congress. Yeah that’s what the people want!

So how does a Democrat governed government fight a war? First declare that the war is lost and when the President of the United States ask for war funding you send him a bill that includes domestic spending, $6.9 billion for recovery along the Gulf Coast and allocates $650 million for children's health care, among other tertiary spending measures, why focus on winning the war?

And then be sure to set dates that your enemy can measure your limits. How long will Americans fight for freedom? Oh about four years and then please no more! Then maybe we can negotiate how much freedom we’re willing to give up to keep the peace. Cindy Sheehan could do that job; Sheehan would make one good ambassador for negotiating away our freedoms for peace.

As additional acts of Democrats inappropriate power grabbing become more and more apparent it should become clear to all Americans that Democrats are acting unconstitutionally.

The last time a shadow government was set up it the United States of America we fought a war over it and President Jefferson Davis was arrested.

That’s something to think about isn’t it President Pelosi?

Gonzales to Stay Over Democrat’s Best Laid Plans to Weaken Bush

Question, what can a Republican do to show that he or she is credible, competent, effective, or demonstrate worthiness for their job. According to Democrats and Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., answer; step down from office.

I think the President is finally getting it. He announced Monday that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales did not break any law or committed any wrongdoing, which is absolutely correct! Separately, a White House spokeswoman said, Gonzales is staying. Another good thing.

The President now understands how the fairy tale that is Democrat controlled politics operates.

Its open season on Republicans and Democrat “Big Bad Wolves” have been playing the game of three little pigs with the White house all along, huffing and puffing, and threatening to blow the Whitehouse down with scandal for almost eight years.

Yet the, “He lied us into Iraq,” huff was made of straw, the “He outed Valerie Plame” puff was made from sticks and now the Alberto Gonzales hearings before a Democratic controlled Senate Judiciary Committee is blowing and blowing but still can’t knock the White house down because its now out of wind.

Charles Schumer chief Democrat Big bad wolf is hoping that the President and his Attorney General will just cave in to his bolstering demands outside of the White house door and just throw AG Gonzales out to the partisan wolves. But recent hopeful statements from the President show that he is tiring of capitulating to false Democrat outcries of “wolf, wolf” and Republican wrong doings.

Democrats seem to think that they can compel Republicans out of office by demanding they step down from office. This is because Democrats are not approving of American’s political choices in the 2000 and 2004 Presidential elections. Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-VT and Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y. apparently seem to think that they can bad mouth Republicans, all Republicans and like the theory of “human caused Global warming” there is no more argument. Everyone agrees!

That is, to the Democrat way of thinking everyone agrees that Republicans including the President should all just quit for the good of the country.

Ah, wait just one minute Senators not everyone agrees that man is the cause of Global warming and you might be surprised to hear that not everyone agrees that the President should be impeached, or for that matter neither should Vice President Cheney. Not everyone agrees that Karl Rove stole the 2000 and 2004 elections and outed Valerie Plame these are all Democrat fairly tales. Fairly tales told to keep the radical “net root” left-wing partisans juiced up with enough hate to win the 2006 mid-term elections, take control of Congress and sever all connections with the values that once made America great

Let us not forget that underneath all of the Valerie Plame blame there was no crime Mr. Libby was not indicted for outing Ms. Plame no one was because even though Democrats held Congressional hearings no one in the White house outed Valerie Plame and likewise in these Gonzales hearings as the President said, “As the hearings went forward, it was clear the attorney general broke no law, there’s no wrongdoing.”

These hearing have lost their wind; the White house is not going to roll over on AG Gonzales just because Democrats wish it to be so. No body’s going to quit to satisfy Democrats false sense of morality and false concern for the country.

For almost eight years Democrats have attempted to destroy the creditability of the Bush White house now to feign that they have some grave concern with Alberto Gonzales’ creditability being damaged or that he is damaging the White house’s creditability is simply laughable.

Democrats are solely responsible for polarizing Washington politics not Alberto Gonzales and not anything that Alberto Gonzales did. Gonzales’ remaining as Attorney General is a message that the Bush administration finally realizes where the real war is.

And it’s not in Iraq its right here in the Capital of the United States of America.

For the President’s remain two years it will serve him well to remember that!

Liberals Create Cloud over White house

President Bush standing in front of members of his Cabinet

Predictable!You had to see this one coming. Democrats and their supporters are attempting to label the Bush administration clouded and awashed with scandal using Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’ Democratic created troubles to launch what Democrats believe is a litany of Bush related Republican crimes and malfeasants.

True, President Bush did promise to "restore honor and integrity" to the White House. He also pledged to usher in a new era of bipartisanship. But for nearing eight years Democrats have successfully sabotaged the President’s every attempt to keep his promises.

However it is Democrats who have refused White house overtures for bipartisanship relations as they have disrespected the office of the Presidency and disrespected the President personally.

But in spite of Democratic attempts pay back for the Clinton impeachment President Bush has restored honor to the White house.

Nevertheless, how quickly they forget the Clinton legacy of corruption and scandal; I don’t think that anyone really wants to go there by attempting to equate the Bush administration with scandal, but in case you do here’s a reminder about the most scandal ridden corrupt Presidency in U.S. history.

Clinton legacy

47 individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine were convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes with 33 of these occurring during the Clinton administration itself. There were in addition 61 indictments or misdemeanor charges. 14 persons were imprisoned.

If we want to talk White house scandal that term is synonymous with Clinton not Bush, let’s be clear Clinton is only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance, Under his administration was the most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates, most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation, most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify, most number of witnesses to die suddenly, first president sued for sexual harassment, first president accused of rape, Hillary was the first, first lady to come under criminal investigation, largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case, first president to establish a legal defense fund, first president to be held in contempt of court, the Clinton presidential campaign had the greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions, greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad, and President Clinton holds the dubious honor of being the first president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court.

In spite of all of this not a peep from Democrats who now want you to think that they are concerned with corruption!

According to our best information, 40 government officials were indicted or convicted in the wake of Watergate. A reader computes that there was a total of 31 Reagan era convictions, including 14 because of Iran-Contra and 16 in the Department of Housing & Urban Development scandal. 47 individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine were convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes with 33 of these occurring during the Clinton administration itself. There were in addition 61 indictments or misdemeanor charges. 14 persons were imprisoned. A key difference between the Clinton story and earlier ones was the number of criminals with whom he was associated before entering the White House. –The Progressive Review, http:// prorev.com/legacy.htm

I don’t hate to say I told you so but I’ve been saying that this Senate hearing regarding Attorney General Gonzales was only to discredit the Bush White house and nothing more.

The real scandal is how a partisan media and a rival political party conspired to invent scandal and attempt to discredit a sitting President by politicizing everything from the war to President Bush’s attempts to keep the American people safe from terrorist attack.

The cloud, if you will, is really over U.S. media and the Democrat party. Americans are seeing more evidence of partisanship over patriotism everyday and Democrats and the media are awashed in it!

Topically the media in reporting about one side of the political spectrum will reference something about the other side to balance out and give some perspective to what they are reporting.

It is not surprising to me that in the two links that I’ve provided the writers attempt to make their point about scandal regarding the Bush White house but failed to mention the Clinton White house why do you suppose that is?

I’ll tell you why, it’s the cloud of scandal that is over this general media and its partisan supporters of the Democratic Party!

Adiós Alberto No Deja la Puerta Golpearle…

Senate Judiciary Committee in the 109th Congress, including incoming chairman Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont). (photo credit — Newsday)

“I went to a fight and a hockey game broke out!”—Rodney Dangerfield

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales went up to Capitol Hill to save his job but much to his surprise he found out that he was front and center at an impeach Bush by proxy hearing and he was the surrogate of the moment.

Liberals and Democrats riled that they could not defeat George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004 by lying on him and attempting to steal both elections have reverted to a more subtle strategic of kicking the legs from under the Bush administration by bush whacking the President’s lieutenants and thereby isolating him for the remaining less than two years of his term.

AG Gonzales totally unprepared for this ambush, thought that if he when before the Democrats and recognize his faults and apologize (a Democrat formula) that he would receive mercy and be thrown back for bigger fish. But as fate would have it Gonzales is the biggest fish that Democrats have netted thus far.

Oh not for lack of trying, Democrats attempted to net President Bush with, “He lied us into war” for the 2004 elections but failed. And then they used the “Who outed Valerie Plame” scenario to badger the President, Vice President and White house adviser Karl Rove for two whole years but alas that didn’t work either.

Dems have been more successful with relatively political big fish like John Ashcroft, Tom Delay, Mark Foley and of course the Jack Abramoff incident has helped net relatively political small fries Rep. John Doolittle (R., Calif.) and Sen. Conrad Burns (R., Mont.), Rep. Randy Cunningham (R-CA) and Rep. Bob Ney (R-OH).

However Gonzales is the closest strike at the heart of the Bush administration a hit here would mean that the President is at the Democrats mercy to confirm another Attorney General now that the Democrats control Congress, and we all know that Democrats are not feeling very merciful toward Republicans these days.

Republicans on the other hand are showing all the political savvy of a first time elected city council member who run on a bet made with friends and as chance would have it won.

Since the 2004 Presidential elections Republicans have been out politicized by their rivals. They make rank amateurs look like consummate professionals which brings me back to AG Gonzales who apparently thought that if he when up to Capital Hill acknowledged his wrong-doing that Democrats would treat him as a fellow politician spank his hand and let him go, what he didn’t realize was that Democrats are not interested in supporting the Bush administration they are only interested in the contrary its deconstruction.

What in the eight years of President Bush’s administration would make anyone believe that any Republican before a Democrat controlled hearing wouldn’t come out with his ears pinned back?

Come on does anyone really believe that Democrats care whether AG Gonzales hurt the Bush administration’s credibility? Hell Democrats have been trying to do that for going on eight years! In fact that is what these hearings are designed to do, hurt the Bush administration. That’s the real reason Democrats are holding them nothing else.

Are you listening Karl Rove? Señor Gonzales this was not a hearing to allow you to justify your actions whatever motivated them. This hearing was only to show you the door. The door to your exit and vicariously the whole Bush administration.


To which Democrats will say…”Vaya con el dios”

But actually they don’t really care how you go just as long as you are gone. And I’m sure that they wouldn’t mind if you take the President with you!

Gonzales should not resign nor should be fired but Republicans are not like Democrats whose money freezer storing,Abramoff moneyed,conflict of interest dealings and lying are business as usual for Democrats. Unfortunately Gonzales will leave office.


To which democrats will say…”Vaya con el dios”

But actually they don’t really care how you go just as long as you are gone. And I’m sure that they wouldn’t mind if you take the President with you!

Adiós Alberto no deja la puerta golpearle…