Monday, March 16, 2009

Do you really want to know where the Bailout moneys went?

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced the deal on the financial bailout bill. With her (from left) are Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, Senate majority leader Harry Reid, and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson. (Lauren Victoria Burke/ Associated Press)


As you know Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson made the Congress agree to give him complete immunity regarding the $700 Billion dollar bailout in section 8 of the legislative proposal from Treasury Department for authority to buy mortgage-related assets, and they did. He also asked for and got complete secrecy as to where the money would go.

So your Congress is as culpable as Paulson for what happen to this unaccounted for money.
Sec. 8. Review.

Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency. (see proposal)
Congressman Dennis Kucinich says that he knows where some of the money went and why the government doesn’t want you to know.

Following is an March 13, 2009 interview in which Congressman Kucinich tells Fox News just where he’s discovered the money went. (see video)



If this is true then your Democrat controlled Congress allowed U.S. citizens’ tax dollars out of the country to the tune of $700 Billion dollars, to prop up the world economy. Which means that no matter what President Obama says we are in worst trouble than we could have ever imagined.

What this also means is that the United States of America ’s economy and the world's global economy are so convolutedly and inextricably linked together that we no longer exist as a sovereign nation. We, in fact, have already lost our national sovereignty!

Of course you aren’t supposed to know that because you might take notice and rise up to fight for your country before it’s too late.

My fear is it may already be too late!

Following is a September 21, 2008 video in which Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson double speaks his way through an interview with ABC’s this week host George Stephanopoulos in the last 6:55 of this 8 min. video Paulson confirms Congressman Kucinich’s claim by stating that the intent of the Treasury Department was to bailout Foreign banks all along. (see video)



The fact that the American people have been put on the hook for a world economy that private bankers, Internationalist and Globalist created means that America is no longer a free and sovereign nation. Henry Paulson, Ben Bernanke the media and the Congress of the United States of America have made the American people slaves, mere serfs of the private bankers and International Globalist.

Global Foreign Interest own us now because they have the American people tied to a debt that we can not possibly repay.

Where did your bailout money go? Your money went down the dark deep hole of the Global financial system. And because we are now a debtor nation with no possible way of ever repaying our debt we are no longer a free and sovereign nation.

We are the slaves of International Bankers and foreign nations that hold our debt.

Friday, March 13, 2009

Democrats worked openly to make Bush Fail

Democrat pollster Stanley Sammon and Democrat strategist James Carville
On the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, just minutes before learning of the terrorist attacks on America, Democratic strategist James Carville was hoping for President Bush to fail, telling a group of Washington reporters: "I certainly hope he doesn't succeed."—Bill Sammon
Come on we all know it! Democrats worked openly throughout the Bush presidency to make him fail.

Democrats not only wanted Republican President George W. Bush to fail they did everything in their power to ensure his failure.

Whatever President Bush’s presidency was, and whatever his legacy is he was sabotaged by Democrats. Democrats connived and colluded for eight solid years against Bush waging an American political war against the president of the United States of America.

They did this most of the time in outright blatant disrespect for this country, disrespect for our constitution, disrespect for our military and they did this when most of the time president Bush was defending this nation from Islamic terrorists who also declared war against America. Bush was constantly fighting on three fronts, al Qaeda terrorists, Democrat political terrorists and media terrorists.

On the morning of 9/11 Democrat operatives and the press where plotting to bring down George W. Bush. Democrat strategist James Carville and Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg were meeting with their fellow co-conspirators in the Washington press, subject how to turn public opinion against Bush. (see story)

All Democrats where and are culpable in this diabolical treachery. They all used the same talking points as they repeated the same anti-Bush rhetoric. You must remember Obama using anti-Bush rhetoric quite liberally and abundantly in his campaign to become president.

Democrats used a number to tactics to turn public sentiment away from Mr. Bush. It started with Bush stole the 2000 election. As I posted previously what happen in 2000 was completely Al Gore’s and Democrats’ operatives’ fault.

If Al Gore cared anything about this country he would have conceded the 2000 election instead of showing off his un-statesmanship like behavior which stirred the whole country up with the nonsense of Chad-gate and taking the 2000 election to court. (see previous post)
Al Gore’s gift to the world! It’s a sort of global warming if you will. Al Gore’s legacy will be that he alone ushered in a new era of doubt in the democratic process, no longer will free and open elections be enough. Due to Mr. Gore every election result from this point forward will be doubted by the losing party and legally scrutinized whether they are cast manually or whether they are electronically posted.—Alaphiah
Even Justice Antonin Scaila says that Al Gore was responsible for the 2000 election mess. (see story)

Next Democrats, in large numbers, voted to go to war in Iraq. But when they found it politically expedite to do so Democrats began using the war to beat George Bush about the head, unjustly and un-fairly of course but nevertheless they mis-characterized the war, they mis-characterized the president’s intentions for going to war and they mis-characterized the fact that they voted for the war. As well Democrats voted several times to fund the war every time they were asked.

And now there is proof positive that 51% of Democrats wanted President Bush to fail.

So President Obama don’t talk about the failed policies of the Bush administration or any other failure of president Bush because if he failed it was because Democrats and the American media worked tirelessly to made failure the only option for president Bush. (see previous post)

When Barack Obama fails it will be because Democrats and the Media propped up this teleprompter reading street organizer from the corrupt politics of Chicago Illinois whose one and only gift of deceptive rhetoric will begin to fail him as the America people begin to see that the talk doesn’t match the walk.

It should be quite clear to all Americans that it was Democrats who reside in the House and the Senate of Congress and now the White House that has set this nation on its present course of failing economic markets, failing jobs, and failing politics.

All because Democrats wanted to see one man fail they destroyed a nation, this nation and maybe even the world.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

9,000 reasons why Obama has no moral high ground with Earmarks

"We need earmark reform, and when I'm president, I will go line by line to make sure that we are not spending money unwisely."—Barack Obama
"It will be a little embarrassing for the president if he signs a bill with that many earmarks on it," said Stan Collender, a veteran Washington budget analyst. "He'll say they're left over from the Bush years, and he as to say that next year the bill will be clean."— William Douglas and David Lightman miamiherald.com
He’s done it! Not only did he sign the $410 billion omnibus spending bill that Democrats filled up with 9,000 earmarks and pet projects the president attempted to displace blame by embracing the earmarks. And then he attempted to give the impression that he wasn’t in the least embarrassed for doing it. And you know what, he wasn’t. It’s like whatever he says at the time is what he expects the American people to believe. Our President is a psychopathic liar. (see story) (see video)



All those promises, and it’s becoming apparent even to Liberal partisans that he didn’t intend to keep even one of them. Barack Hussein Obama is conscience-free and he has no guilt or shame. Many of you mistook his psychosis for coolness, for calmness but it’s not. Obama just doesn’t give a damn what you or I think.

Obama promised to go through any bill line by line to make sure that he and Democrats weren’t going to spend our money unwisely, remember he promised that on the campaign trail. Now tell me do you seriously think that he went through this $410 billion dollar pork barrel to prevent wasteful spending? I seriously doubt it and you do too!

But here the pathetic part, as he signed the bill Obama blame President Bush for leaving 9,000 Earmarks around which he and Democrats were forced to sign into law! Is that crazy or what?

Despite the fact that congressional Democrats crafted much of the bill after Obama was elected, the White House argues that the pork-laden bill — which increases federal spending across a range of Cabinet departments by 8% — is part of the prior Administration's legacy.-- Jay Newton-Small and Michael Scherer (see story)

President Bush did not waste tax payers money on 9,000 Earmarks so according to the Obama administration that’s a bad thing (unfinished business). And not only that, we are supposed to believe that it is actually a good thing that President Obama has signed this Democrat Christmas tree into law.
Let see that’s;

• $200,000 for “Tattoo Removal Violence Prevention Outreach Program,” pg. 283;
• $188,000 for Maine lobster earmark in the omnibus, pg. 173;
• $5.8 million earmark for the “Ted Kennedy Institute for the Senate…for the planning and design of a building & an endowment,” pg. 232;
• $473,000 for National Council of La Raza, earmark from Sens. Bingaman and Menendez, pg. 212.
• $2 Million for Children's Wooden Arrow Makers
• $1.9 million for the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service
• $1 Million for New York Woodstock Museum
• $192 Million for U.S. Territories' Rum Industries
• $98,000 to Develop a Walking Tour of Boydton, Virginia
• $50,000 for the National Mule and Packers Museum in Bishop, California
• $583,000 for the Montana World Trade Center
• $460,752 for Beer Ingredient
• $150,000 for "Rat Island"
• Money for improving blueberry products in Georgia
• Money a solar highway in Oregon
• Money a pleasure taxi service in Connecticut
• And Money for Mormon cricket control (source)
President Obama checked this bill for wasteful spending just as well as he vets his picks for Cabinet positions for his administration.
"Done right, earmarks have given legislators the opportunity to direct federal money to worthy projects that benefit people in their districts. And that's why I've opposed their outright elimination."—President Barack Obama
Beer, Rum and wooden arrows I’d say that’s doing earmarks right president Obama!

The unfortunate political ploy that Democrats and the Obama administration are attempting to sell to the American people is that President Bush is responsible for this earmark infested bill. That’s right you heard me, if President Bush would have signed these 9,000 Earmarks into law then President Obama would not have had to. What a load!

The Obama administration has said it will recommend changes for future spending and appropriations measures, but that the president viewed this bill as essential. Obama has "no second thoughts" about signing it, White House spokesperson and Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said.

"I bet many presidents have signed bills that may not meet 100% of their desires," Gibbs told reporters in the televised briefing. "This stuff should have been done before Sen. Barack Obama became President-elect Barack Obama and certainly before he became President Barack Obama."

Gibbs said the bill was not perfect, but that the president was committed to changing the process. "There'll be some new rules of the road," Gibbs said.
Now that’s just insulting to our collective intelligence President Obama funds 9,000 earmarks for billions of dollars and at the same time promises a future fix for pork barrel spending.

I would call that the audacity of stealing tax payers’ money in the middle of the worst economic times since the great depression or you might call it a president who is a psychopathic liar and a Democrat controlled Congress that is complicit in thief of taxpayers’ money.

How does the Obama administration justify this bill? By deception of course, just as they always do.

Notice the pattern first sign it, and then promise to do something different in the future, then justify wrong action by stating that it is an emergency or that it is critical that something wrong be allowed just for the moment, express that you are not ashamed of doing the wrong thing. Point out the fact everyone is doing it and finally if all else fails or even if it doesn’t, Blame Bush.

There’s no moral high ground here Mr. Obama only Psychopathic behavior Mr. President.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Be Careful What You Wish For

If it's unpatriotic and supposedly treasonous for conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh to want Barack Obama's policies to fail in the middle of a serious recession, is it similarly so for Democrats who wished President Bush wouldn't succeed while the nation was at war?-- Noel Sheppard
I want Barack Obama to Fail. Since I wrote that in November of 2008 a famous radio personality has pick up the sentiment and Liberals have gone sanctimoniously apoplectic in their affront at the thought.

Why even one such person of the Liberal persuasion who knows my political views walked up to me and said, “Hey, we’re all in this together we all have to hope that President Obama succeeds, right?” He obviously concerned by the poor political start of his favorite Socialist-Marxist of choice.

As Bugs of Bunny said to Elmer Fudd, “He don’t know me very well do he?”

Boy did I lay into that Alzheimer’s suffering hypocrite. I began to recant Murtha, Reid, Clinton, Kerry, Dean, Gore and Obama who all at the height of the Iraq war and for eight solid years of the Bush presidency made it known in no uncertain terms that they wanted President Bush to fail, they wanted the Iraq war to fail and by extension they wanted America to fail. (see story)

Oh, but he couldn’t or didn’t remember Democrats ever wanting (or saying that they wanted) President Bush to fail.

Lucky that anonymous person who said that a picture is worth a thousand words (or actions for that matter) must have had the August 2006, Fox News/Opinion Dynamics poll in mind. This poll is solid evidence that Democrats of every and all persuasions wanted President Bush to fail. (see poll)

10. Regardless of how you voted in the presidential election, would you say you want President Bush to succeed or not?
SCALE: 1. Yes, want him to succeed 2. No, do not want him to succeed 3. (Don’t know)






YesNo(Don’t Know)
8-9 Aug 0663%32 5
Democrats40%519
Republicans90%77
Independents63%343


Does be careful what you ask for apply here? It certainly does! There is a god-awful lot of Democrats responsible for the mess that we are in as a country, heck you asked for it by wishing for President Bush’s failure.
Yes, that says 51 percent of Democrats and 34 percent of Independents didn't want President Bush to succeed...even though our nation was at war in Iraq and Afghanistan.-- Noel Sheppard
51% of you Democrats wanted President Bush to fail you, according to your 2006 polling, wanted it bad and your politicos on Capitol Hill worked tirelessly to that end ensuring that everything that a sitting president did was perceived by the America people and the people of the world as failed policy.

So how dare any of you hypocritical anti-Bush psychotics pitch a fit. It was you who created this climate in which the Party out of power works to make the President of the Party in power fail.
I disagree fervently with the people on our side of the aisle who have caved and who say, "Well, I hope he succeeds. We've got to give him [President Obama] a chance." Why? They didn't give Bush a chance in 2000. Before he was inaugurated the search-and-destroy mission had begun. –Rush Limbaugh (see previous post)
Conservatives believe that Liberals are taking this country in the wrong direction and just like Liberals we are going to fight tooth and nail to prevent that from happening.

While it’s true that we don’t have the same Jack booted allegiance that the Democrats used to win in 2006 and 2008. No, we have Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe, Arlen Specter, John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Mel Martinez all Mavericks in their own right. What we do have is an up and coming grassroots movement that will vote out all of these enablers of Democrats.

We want everyone who is even remotely connected with the Democrat agenda to fail after all that’s what Democrats wished on America and where we are right now is a result of Democrats wishing the worst for America when they wished for the failure of George W. Bush.

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Al Gore Proved Wrong about Global Warming Gets Obama’s Support Anyway

Albert Arnold Gore, Jr.
The CO2 wars have begun. Presumably following White House directions, the EPA is ready to issue an "Endangerment Finding" on carbon dioxide, paving the way for regulations to control CO2 emissions.—Dr. S. Fred Singer
Al Gore has discovered that one can use the former prestige of being the Vice president of the United States of America couple that with bad science and turn them into phenomenal fame and riches. Gore has won a Grammy, an Oscar, and a Nobel Peace Prize but I’m sure that he would give it all back if he could have the one prize that has eluded him thus far, taxing billions of dollars of your money.

For years Mr. Gore has been heavily leveraged on the front end of cap and trade investments. He was hoping for windfall profits when he first started his campaign in 2000 denouncing anthropogenic Global warming due to man-made CO2 emissions. (see here, here and here)

In Gore’s vision the world would simply panic persuaded by his cataclysmic pronouncements and dire warnings to act immediately or face the irreversible consequences of melting ice caps, dieing Polar Bears, rising sea levels and the CO2 induced warming of Earth that would be so extreme that the Earth would soon resemble the terrain on Mars. Only one thing though, Al Gore is wrong! (see video)




Well after nine years of Gore’s Global Warming Prophecies, the Earth is still standing, we are all still here. And the fact that you didn’t allow the government to willy-nilly run off and join the Kyoto agreements and other European cap and trade schemes which would have forced American tax payers and their children’s children to pay for Al Gore’s and his children’s C02 investments has Gore perplexed and a bit angry.

Don’t you get it? Going green is all one giant scam! Oh there are some lowly environmentalist and college students that are in it to save the planet but by-in-large this is a big money venture on the scale of creating a second Federal Reserve. This is an Energy Federal Reserve and like the original there is money for nothing to be made coming directly from a permanent source the American tax payer.

That’s the bottom line, that’s the truth about Al Gore’s Global warming and climate change scheme, what Gore is really about is tax payer’s money going to him and his associates under the guise of saving the planet.
Tom Randall of Winningreen LLC reports (Feb 5): Steven Chu, President Obama's new Secretary of Energy, held his first news conference last Tuesday, urging a propaganda campaign to scare the public into spending additional billions of dollars to combat mythical global warming.—SEPP
After eight years of being rebuffed by George W. Bush Gore finally has someone in the White House who cares even less than he does about the tax payer’s money and now he is sure that all of his investments will begin to take off once President Obama’s White House signs off on all of Gore’s Global warming initiatives. (see story)
[A] full-blown application of the Clean Air Act would be the equivalent of an atomic bomb directed at the US economy — all without any scientific justification. Hence there is speculation that the White House strategy is to use the threat of EPA regulation to force Congress to take action.—Dr. S Fred Singer
The only thing between Gore and his big payday now is the current state of the economy. President Obama will enact Clean Air policies and EPA regulations which residually will make Al Gore wealthier than the country of Venezuela but Obama has got to get money flowing in the economy again so that tax payers won’t notice the siphoning off of more billions of their dollars.

We all know that Global warming is not the Earth killer that Gore said it was in 2000 so why are they still doing this? Your money, it couldn’t be anything else because according to Dr. Singer CO2 is not even a pollutant!

But why reduce CO2 emission at all?
• CO2 is not a "pollutant." The best evidence we have from climate science shows that any warming from the emission of greenhouse gases is insignificant — contrary to claims by the UN-IPCC. See the NIPCC report, Nature Not Human Activity Rules the Climate, at www.sepp.org.
• The climate has not been warming since 1998 — in spite of steadily rising CO2 levels. But even if it were warming, reputable economists have shown that it would yield overall benefits. For details, see the NIPCC report.
• Finally, the level of CO2 is now largely controlled by emissions from China. But even if all nations were to cut emissions according to the Kyoto Protocol, CO2 levels would continue to rise, albeit at a slightly slower rate.
Global warming/Climate Change has never been about the planet it has always been about creating a new revenue stream for the Global economy. The Global warming agenda is economic slavery for the 21st century and beyond, and that my comrade fits in quite well with Obama's plan of “Change” also known as fascist socialism for the United States of America.

Monday, March 09, 2009

In the Midst of National Crisis Democrats Advance Agenda Ignore Causes

"Never let a serious crisis go to waste. What I mean by that is it's an opportunity to do things you couldn't do before."-- White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel
"Yes, this is a moment of challenge for our country, but we've experienced great trials before. And with every test, each generation has found the capacity to not only endure, but to prosper - to discover great opportunity in the midst of great crisis."—President Barack Obama
Whether it’s Rahm Emanuel or Barack Obama both men believe that crisis is good! Good that is, for putting forth a concurrent covert Liberal Democrat agenda. In President’s Obama weekly address the president outlined a bold Democrat agenda in spite of the fact that the nation is suffering on the brink of an economic catastrophe.

It is President Obama’s and Democrats’ plan to expand their power and control over the government while you and I worry about the manufactured economic crisis which the United States is in the middle of. (see story)

This country is suffering from 20 to 30 years of Corporations outsourcing middle class jobs to the global economy in order to maximize their own profits free from U.S. taxes and regulations. In addition to that of course we also suffer from Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Chairmen of the Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke, front men of international money interest, sacking of the U.S. Economy.

All the while president Obama is talking about enacting government funded Health Care that will be yet another tax on the American people because realistically it is the American people who are paying for it all.

In Obama’s 3/7/09 weekly address he outlines his “bold” plan to retrofit American into the Euro-socialist model. (see video)



If the president truly wanted to pull America out of its crisis he would take control of America’s monetary system, he then would pull America out of all of its international commitments. Like for instance if American is in such grave crisis (which we are), why did Secretary of State Hillary Clinton just commit the American tax payer on Thursday March 5th to $900 million dollars in aid to the Palestinians? Where is that money coming from?(see story)

And lastly if the President really wanted to help America and Americans he would stop spending not increase it!
"Government spending is always a “tax” burden on the American people and is never equally or fairly distributed. The poor and low-middle income workers always suffer the most from the deceitful tax of inflation and borrowing." -Congressman Ron Paul
The Republicans are no better in this regard. Instead of Republicans forcefully opposing Democrats and defending the American people against the tyranny of Obama’s agenda of, changing the American system to one of de facto Socialism, Republicans answer in their weekly address sheepishly and timid. (see video)

Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., Republican 3/7/09 weekly radio address

"A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated in the hands of a few men.

We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the world--no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men."
— President Woodrow Wilson
So just what did people who voted for Obama and change get? They got a new administration that will deconstruct all American foundational tenants.

Tenants that made this country uniquely exceptional and free to exercise God-given rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, plus they will be severely strapped with the burden of paying for global economic reform in the form of carbon taxes as well as paying for the world and American economic debt for generations to come.
The Money Power! It is the greatest power on earth; and it is arrayed against Labour. No other power that is or ever was can be named with it... it attacks us through the Press - a monster with a thousand lying tongues, a beast surpassing in foulness any conceived by the mythology that invented dragons, were wolves, harpies, ghouls and vampires. It thunders against us from innumerable platforms and ,Yes, so far as we are concerned, the headquarters of the Money Power is Britain.

But the Money Power is not a British institution; it is cosmopolitan. It is of no nationality, but of all nationalities. It dominates the world. The Money Power has corrupted the faculties of the human soul, and tampered with the sanity of the human intellect...
Editorial from 1907 edition of The Brisbane Worker (Australia)
If President Obama were concerned about the Middle Class as he pretends all he would have to do is demand that all corporations that have exposed America to economic ruin for the cheap un-unionized labor of India and Asia reorient themselves to support the American worker over their greed for usurious profits of the last 20 to 30 years. One would think that these international geniuses would have figured out by now that it isn't wise to attempt to kill the goose that lay the golden egg!

That said, Obama should wretch control of the American economic system away from the money lenders and internationalist who have enslaved the America people with trillions of dollars of debt.
"Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and
commerce."
— James A. Garfield, President of the United States
If the Obama Socialists are true populists as they campaigned that they were to win the election then off with the heads of the ruling moneyed aristocracy like the 1790 revolution of France.

The French Revolution killed about 40,000 predator elites in the name of Liberty, about 14 percent of the 27.7 million French population.

The killing of the predator elites happened after the ordinary people realized that (1) ordinary people were the nation's sole producers of real wealth, (2) the small number of predator elites had grabbed most of the wealth, (3) the predator elites gained wealth through cheating and corruption, and (4) the predator elites directed much of their corruption at destroying the French middle classes to gain obscene profits.

History is now repeating itself with regard to predator elites vs. ordinary people. There's an historical echo in here.

If Americans kill about 400,000 elites, they will nearly equal the French's approximately 14 percent of the population. As with the French, the targets would be feckless and fascist politicians, corruption-minded corporate boards and CEOs, anti-Constitutional legislators, elites-favoring judges, greed-driven medicrats, usurious bankers and financiers, anti-Constitutional military chiefs, state-level govt officials of all anti-Constitutional stripes, etc., etc.
-- Stephen Neitzke (see source)
Today the way to kill off the elites is to cut off their money supply. Everyone knows it but will those in the Obama administration who came into power on the populist mantle actually do it or are they only interest in advancing their agenda under the status quo?
"People who will not turn a shovel full of dirt on the project (Muscle Shoals Dam) nor contribute a pound of material, will collect more money from the United States than will the People who supply all the material and do all the work.

This is the terrible thing about interest ...But here is the point: If the Nation can issue a dollar bond it can issue a dollar bill. The element that makes the bond good makes the bill good also. The difference between the bond and the bill is that the bond lets the money broker collect twice the amount of the bond and an additional 20%.

Whereas the currency, the honest sort provided by the Constitution pays nobody but those who contribute in some useful way. It is absurd to say our Country can issue bonds and cannot issue currency. Both are promises to pay, but one fattens the usurer and the other helps the People. If the currency issued by the People were no good, then the bonds would be no good, either.

It is a terrible situation when the Government, to insure the National Wealth, must go in debt and submit to ruinous interest charges at the hands of men who control the fictitious value of gold. Interest is the invention of Satan."
— THOMAS A. EDISON
If president Obama pursuits his Liberal Democrat agenda under the present economic structure he is no better than George W. Bush a man that Obama railed against for putting this country in the economic mess that we are in.

Bush didn’t do it, it was the International money interests and corporations that have America on the brink of failing.

The question is will Obama do something about it or will he give speeches and then go back and move papers around on his desk in the White House while America is dismantled by the avarice of people who are well on their way to destroying the greatest economic engine that the world has ever produced. Such is the National crisis which we face.

Enough of rearranging the deck chairs on the USS Titanic of our economic crisis Mr. Obama. The People want you to stop exchanging Liberal Democrat ideology in place of Conservative ideology. The people want you to stop holding high school and college conferences and do something real about the economy Mr. Obama or… you are no better Mr. Obama than the man that you reviled and sent packing to Dallas Texas.

Friday, March 06, 2009

Moderates are to Blame for Obama

Moderate David Brooks
Those of us who consider ourselves moderates — moderate-conservative, in my case — are forced to confront the reality that Barack Obama is not who we thought he was.

His words are responsible; his character is inspiring. But his actions betray a transformational liberalism that should put every centrist on notice.

As Clive Crook, an Obama admirer, wrote in The Financial Times, the Obama budget “contains no trace of compromise. It makes no gesture, however small, however costless to its larger agenda, of a bipartisan approach to the great questions it addresses. It is a liberal’s dream of a new New Deal.”
—David Brooks
Moderates are sniveling little politicos who vacillate between political ideologies like undecided underachieving high school graduates who can’t decide between a job at McDonald’s or signing up for the Armed Services.

David Brooks is such a Moderate, he and Moderates like him are the reasons that we have a far left radical in the White House and the best that Brook can say now in his mea culpa entitled, A Moderate Manifesto” is , Oops my bad! (see story)

Too little to late Mr. Brooks but I would be remiss if I didn’t say that Conservatives tried to warn you about Obama but you wouldn’t listen to reason.

Brooks and Moderates wouldn’t hear it when Conservatives warned them that Barack Hussein Obama is the job at McDonald’s. Mr. Brooks is only realizing that point now in his admission that the President is not who he and his fellow Moderates thought he was.

Well Mr. Obama told you exactly who he was in two years of campaigning we all heard it but it was Moderates who chose to hear what they wanted to hear regarding Obama.

Let me be clear Barack Obama did not deceive in this case. He is doing exactly what he said that he was going to do, that is fundamentally change America, if he were elected president Mr. Brooks.

So for Mr. Brooks or any Moderate to imply that they didn’t know who Obama was or what he would do is emblematic of the problem with Moderates.

And it is for this reason all Moderates should be striped of the illusion that they are rational fair-minded individuals who attempt to see both sides of an issue and will always come down on the correct side of said issues.

A Moderate is a Liberal who for faulty imprinting or fear is afraid to totally claim his or her Liberal tendencies. As Republicans discovered in the 2006 and 2008 elections a Party that houses Moderates is a Party that will be defeated by the opposing radical Party who harbors no such perfidy.

There is a biblical scripture that describes a Moderate as vomit.
I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other!

So, because you are lukewarm--neither hot nor cold--I am about to spit you out of my mouth.
–NIV Revelations 3:15-16
Mr. Brooks’ realization of what America has become under an Obama administration is like a young girl explaining a pregnancy as, “It just happened!”

No it didn’t just happen Mr. Brooks this was the plan all along.

Democrats have been planning for this day since they lost the Congress in 1994 in the Contract with America revolution.

It took them until 2006 to reclaim Congress and 2008 to reclaim the White house and Barack Obama is only the face of the Democrat Liberal agenda to remake America Mr. Brooks.

One would think that a syndicated columnist like you would be better informed Mr. Brooks.

Brooks says that he didn’t realize that an Obama administration would mean; Social programs piling up on top of each other, a gargantuan $3.6 trillion budget, and deficits that, when considered realistically, are $1 trillion a year or an agenda that represents a social-engineering experiment.

Brooks says that the U.S. has never been a society riven by class resentment. Yet the Obama budget is predicated on a class divide.

Brooks points out that the president issued a read-my-lips pledge that no new burdens will fall on 95 percent of the American people. All the costs will be borne by the rich and all benefits redistributed downward.

Brooks further laments the following; the U.S. has always been a decentralized nation, skeptical of top-down planning. Yet, the current administration concentrates enormous power in Washington, while plan after plan emanates from a small group of understaffed experts.

The U.S. has always had vibrant neighborhood associations. But in its very first budget, the Obama administration raises the cost of charitable giving. It punishes civic activism and expands state intervention.

The U.S. has traditionally had a relatively limited central government. But federal spending as a share of G.D.P. is zooming from its modern norm of 20 percent to an unacknowledged level somewhere far beyond.
***


I only have one question for you Mr. Brooks what is it about fundamental “Change” that you don’t understand?

Oh I do have another question, What is it about Socialism and radical Liberal agenda that the Democrats have represented for well over 50 years that you didn’t understand Mr. Brooks?

What Democrats have achieved is Democratic Nirvana; this is the total Democrat program the total Democrat package.

This whole Democrat Liberal program is what Moderates voted for when they supported and voted for Barack Hussein Obama so to write that you didn’t know or it just happened or what is happening isn’t what you thought was going to happen is not acceptable because the damage that you and your fellow Moderates have afflicted on the country is a Pandora’s Box of radical Liberalism which cost to this Country’s integrity will be more than we can pay.

Obama never would have been elected had it not been for the Moderates in the media and in the Republican Party.

So take a look at your handy work Mr. Brooks and know that what Moderates bring to our politics is vomit.

It would be better if you where either hot or cold, Liberal or Conservative because according to your article even you Mr. Brooks can’t stomach what you’ve brought on the American people by supporting Barack Hussein Obama!

Thursday, March 05, 2009

I Hope You Are Happy Now!

This post is directed to all those college students
who voted for Barack Obama.
You wanted change,
you got it............... and definitely not for the better.

You criticized older, wiser parents and other adults,
for “messing up the country”. But long after I am
gone, you are the ones who will be stuck with the burden
of your own stupidity.
“Change you can believe in”, became more than just a slogan. It effectively chained you, your children, and your grandchildren, to generations of
insurmountable debt
, lowering your standards of living,
and consuming most of your household’s two-incomes for
taxes.

You can’t say that you weren’t warned. Older, wiser voters had tried to inform you that programs like Obama’s
just don’t work.
Socialism is not the American way, and
you will soon see why, and live to regret it.

I remember a story that someone told me, about a female
college student and her dad. They had been discussing
political parties, and the daughter stated that she was a
staunch Democrat,
and belittled the father for being a
Republican, saying that he favored benefits for the “rich”,
rather than “entitlements” for the middle class.


The father asked her how things were going at school, and
told her that he missed her coming home on weekends as
she had previously done. She began to bemoan the fact that
she was carrying a more than normal credit load, and that
plus her part-time job on campus, kept her busy all the time.

She said that she missed all the campus parties, because she
just didn’t seem to have any time to have fun, and was proud
that she was able to maintain a 4.0 grade.


Dad asked about her roommate and whether she was in the
same boat. The daughter said, “no way dad...... she parties
all the time, never does her assignments and is close to failing.
Laura can barely maintain a 2.0, because half the time she is
either late for class or misses it entirely”.


Dad said, “you really like her, don’t you?” The daughter said,
“yes dad, she is my best friend”. “Well”, said dad, “why don’t
you give Laura just one of your credits
........... that way, each of
you will have a 3.0?

Daughter hit the ceiling!!!! “What???.......... I should give her
one of my credits, that I worked so hard for, when she has been
partying every night since term began? No way!!! Those
credits are mine, I earned them and I will not share them!”


Dad smiled, looked at his daughter and said,................”welcome
to the Republican Party honey”

A Conservative Primer

Jonathan Krohn


Jonathon Krohn, 13, author, speaker and Conservative addressed CPAC February 27, 2009 reminds us what it is to be a Conservative. Enjoy! (see Video)




Define Conservatism Hat tip to:Ms Placed Democrat

Wednesday, March 04, 2009

Is it because he’s…a Tax Cheat?

Ron Kirk President Obama’s nominee as U.S. Trade Representative


President Barack Hussein Obama enjoys comparing himself with historical presidents and their administrations. He often makes some sort of claim that his administration is the first or the most of any administration in American history.

But oops those pesky taxes again, and don’t be hatin’! You just wish you could cheat on your taxes and be nominated for some prestigious job instead of going to jail like the regular tax frauds.

Ron Kirk has just got it like that you’ all. Kirk owes an estimated $10,000 dollars in back taxes.

According to STEPHEN OHLEMACHER and DAVE ESPO of the Associated Press, […] the taxes arise from Kirk's handling of speaking fees he donated to a scholarship fund that he set up at his alma mater, and for his deduction of the full cost of season tickets to the Dallas Mavericks professional basketball team.

Kirk also agreed to make changes in his accounting of charitable deductions, including reducing the claimed value of a donated television from $3,000 to $1,500. (see story)

Uh that’s tax fraud, I’m I the only one seeing this? But after sailing through President Obama’s top notch highly rigorous vetting process the Senate Finance Committee doesn’t think that a little tax indiscretion will stop Obama’s pick for Trade Representative. Open and accepted corruption this maybe a first for any U.S. administration!
Committee chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) issued a statement expressing support for Kirk, calling him “the right person for this job and I will work to move his nomination quickly.” --KENNETH P. VOGEL, Politico (see story)
What is this the 4th tax evader to be nominated to the Obama administration? That has got to be some kind of record!

A third of the Senate voted against Tim Geithner's confirmation as treasury secretary after it was disclosed that he had to pay more than $34,000 in back taxes and interest on income he made while working for the International Monetary Fund. (He was confirmed anyway)

Former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle then withdrew as a nominee to become Health and Human Services after it was disclosed that he failed to pay $128,000 in taxes. Nancy Killefer, Obama's pick for chief performance officer, also bowed out amid tax problems.

This has got to be the world’s record for the absolute worst vetting process of any administration in the history of the Presidency or this has got to be the most corrupt start any President has ever had selecting a cabinet in the entire history of the United States of America! Old honest Abe must be turning in his grave!

The White House is confident that Kirk will be confirmed by the Senate. That’s right, let’s see, a Democrat in the White House and a Democrat controlled Congress, and yes I’ll say that the White House’s confidence is well placed.

When Senator Obama promised to fundamentally change America did you have any idea that he meant changing America from a Country of honestly and integrity into a Country of tax cheaters and liars all on his cabinet?

One should ask, “Why does this President continue to surround himself with William Ayers, Jeremiah Wrights and Tony Rezkos types. We should have seen this lack of character flaw of Obama’s. Before the election, Hillary Clinton tried to warn us but we didn’t listen.

With the nomination of Kirk, President Obama has established his administration as the Anti-Ethics Administration. Obama is well on his way of having the worst ethically run presidential administration in American history.

Are you regretting your vote yet? You will!

Tuesday, March 03, 2009

In a Country of Morons!

It amazes me that with each passing day,
we go deeper and deeper into this financial quagmire.
Why? It might be because those “in charge”
can’t find their posteriors with two hands and a flashlight.

To me, it’s a no-brainer, that raising taxes will only push us further down into the rut. What are these idiots thinking?Rather than “fix” the problem by mortgaging our great-grandchildren’s future, working with what we have available to us today, would have been too simple for them.

Look!........... recessions come and go. They are the natural phenomena of a free-working capitalistic society. They weed out the weak, and reinforce the strong. If you don’t like that,
then you are living in the wrong country.

What Obama wants to do, with the help of the liberal Democrats
in Congress, and a few misguided “Republicans”
, is steer the
country directly into Socialism.!He is determined to tear down the very fabric of the United States, and convert us into a member of a “world government”, built on socialism, income redistribution,
and “cradle to grave care”.
Very admirable! But totally
unworkable,
as witnessed by the great success of the Soviet Union,
that had to build walls, not to keep people out of the country, but
to keep their own citizens in. Can you imagine a “Union of Socialist American States”? This is Obama’s ultimate aim. He has deceived
the fools who didn’t see through his pie-in-the-sky rhetoric,
and they
are the ones responsible for bringing this incompetent to the highest
office of the United States.

The bills that President Obama signs, it seems on a daily basis, will
do nothing for us.
...........neither today nor a year from now. These
are “welfare” bills, not investments in our future.

Mr. President............ a first year economics student could see what
has to be done. You keep adding insult to injury, with your massive
spending programs. Instead of mortgaging our great-great-grandchildren’s
futures, do the only sensible thing that can be done. Put a nine month
moratorium on all federal income taxes
. No personal income tax, no business tax, no corporate tax. Simple..... and I am willing to bet that our problems will be solved within that time frame. The companies that
are presently in trouble, will get the chance to dig out. The workers
will have that extra cash to pay down debt, or invest in the markets.

Oh, ......................”we will lose revenue”, did you say? You will lose a
lot less revenue than the trillions that you are draining from our national
wealth. The economy will turn around, without all these stimulus
packages
that have no hope of accomplishing that, because most of
what is in those packages is pure pork or payback to your ultra-left constituents.

By this time next year, we could be well on the way back to where we
were a year ago. The government would begin taking in sufficient
revenue from all the new jobs that would be created, to cut that
“awesome Bush deficit
which you have now tripled.

So President Obama.............please don’t continue to insult the
intelligence of most of the American voters
. You got into office by
misrepresenting your intended purpose.
I did believe that you
were going to bring “change you can believe in”
which is why I didn’t
vote for you.
If only the ones that you conned had felt the same as
I did, I think that this country would be better off today.

NASA Scientist James Hansen Called for Global Warming Civil Disobedience

Dr. James Hansen at a Capitol Hill press conference in 2008.
"Oh my goodness, I'm not surprised ... The fact that Jim Hansen has gone off the deep end here is sad because he's a good fellow."-- Dr. John Theon NASA Scientist and Hansen’s former supervisor


Yesterday March 2, 2009 in an event that was supposed to draw thousands of protestors and other subversives in Congress like Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Ed Markey, Chairman of the Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming was a bust. Only 500 radical leftists marched on Washington D.C. and Pelosi and Markey didn't show according to CNSNews.com.

However the 500 that braved frigid snowy temperatures to demand an end to Global warming and the end of the use of coal and other fossil fuels seems to have gotten at least something of their wishes fulfilled. (see story)

One wonders if God was listening because there was not the slightest hint of Global warming yesterday in fact there has not been any Global warming since 1998! (see previous post)

And here's another shocker there was absolutely no need for this march because according to scientist the effects of 100 years of green house gases, the cause of global warming, have be wiped out last year so everybody can just ease up on the Global warming/Climate change mantra! (see previous post)

Scientists now say that in one year’s time one century of warming has been wiped out. The argument is over. Everyone who has promoted the theory of Global warming was and is terribly wrong.--Alaphiah


How ironic that a freezing snowy day in Washington D.C. would punctuate the fact that the Global warming theory is a farce, a charade. So why were those 500 brave souls braving the frigid wintry weather to protest Global warming in Washington D.C. you ask? They are egged on by Dr. James Hansen who has used his position at NASA to gin up support for his failed theories of Global warming. (see story)
Against all empirical evidence that the Earth is cooling not warming NASA scientist Dr. James Hansen is still issuing Al Gore like cataclysmic predictions that CO2 in the atmosphere is trapped and is producing a greenhouse effect that is melting polar icecaps.—Alaphiah (see previous post)
There are noted scientist such as Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal who have refused Hansen’s claims of carbon dioxide induced Global warming in addition to Dr. John Theon. (see story)
“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.”- Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.
Joshua Rhett Miller of Foxnews.com reports Dr. Theon, a former senior NASA atmospheric scientist, rebuked Hansen last month in a letter to the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee, saying Hansen had violated NASA's official position on climate forecasting without sufficient evidence and embarrassed the agency by airing his claims before Congress in 1988.

"Why he has not been fired I do not understand," Theon said. "As a civil servant, you can't participate in calling for a public demonstration. You may be able to participate as a private citizen, but when you go on the Internet and call for people to break the law, that's a problem."


Miller also reported that, Chris Horner, author of "Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You Misinformed," also denounced Hansen's latest call to arms against climate change.

"He's providing ample cause to question his employment on the taxpayer dime," Horner told FOXNews.com. "He's clearly abused his platform provided to him by the taxpayer, principally by the way he's been exposed of manipulating and revising data with the strange coincidence of him always found on the side of exaggerating the warming."

Horner claimed that Hansen doctored temperature data on two occasions in 2001 and once in 2007 in attempts to show an impending climate catastrophe.
"He's creating an upward slope that really wasn't there," Horner said. "At some point you have to say these aren't mistakes."


It is clear that the over 90 groups in the so-called progressive Liberal movement who that were expected to participate see this as their time now that the most Liberal member of Congress is president.

The saddest part of is once again college students are being used as pawns to advance some radicals’ version of political correctness whether they realize it or not.

As for James Hansen, he should be summarily fired!

Monday, March 02, 2009

Just because it looks like quid pro quo doesn’t mean it is

President Obama’s pick for Urban Czar Adolfo Carrion
Bronx Borough President Adolfo Carrion often received contributions just before or after he sponsored money for projects or approved important zoning changes, records show.

Most donations were organized and well-timed.
Benjamin Lesser and Greg B. Smith
We have a new Department of Urban Affairs as I reported on Friday. Today we have a new head of that Department he’s former Bronx Boro President Adolfo Carrion. Carrion starts his job, as President Obama’s Urban Czar, in a wake of speculation that he is up to his eyeballs in political corruption that would make even former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich blush.

In Carrion’s world pay for play or quid pro quo is just one great big coincidence and according to Benjamin Lesser and Greg B. Smith of nydailynews.com there are an awful lot of coincidences in the way that Carrion conducts business in the Ghetto (or Urban area) we lovingly refer to as the New York Bronx. (see story)

Just by pure coincidence almost every building project that needs to be approved by Carrion, which means that millions of dollars of taxpayers money would be used to fund said projects, there are quite timely but unrelated donations that fill the coffers of the Carrion political machine.

Quite remarkable political talent wouldn’t you say? In fact so remarkable that such talent didn’t escape the eye of the President of the United States but just how did Mr. Carrion get pass that crackerjack team of vetters that the Obama administration is so proud of we’ll never know?

You remember the vetters in the Obama administration were supposed to guarantee that the Obama administration was to be the squeakiest cleanest most ethical administration in the history of administrations. (see previous post)

I guess pay for play or quid pro quo must not be an offense to the Obama administration. For that matter none payment of taxes doesn’t seem to bother them either, they must be reserving the vetting process for anyone who has ever had or has any ties to the Republican Party.

As the new Czar of Urban Affairs settles into the Obama administration today here are a list of the coincidences that the Obama administration obviously overlooked or didn’t feel that these appearances of political criminality were out of place in the Obama government.

• Last year Jonathan Coren and a partner wanted to build 166 units of affordable housing in Parkchester.
Coren, for the first time in his life, became a registered fund-raiser - for Carrion. He raised $2,577 from multiple donors in the three weeks before Carrion approved the project on March 26.

• A top source for Carrion's campaign cash comes from a publicly funded project to build 679 units of housing and a 14-story college tower in Melrose.
Top officials at the Atlantic Development Group, the project's developer, and Boricua College contributed nearly $70,000 to Carrion during the time the project, called Boricua Village, moved through the system
College President Victor Alicea has been a fund-raiser for Carrion. Alicea insisted all Boricua donations came from "individuals," not the college. "We're very careful about anything that could be construed as a tradeoff or a quid pro quo."
• In 2004, a real estate group moved to build affordable housing on the site of an old Mott Haven brewery on St. Ann's Ave. The project stalled.

In April 2007, dozens of employees of Jackson Development Group started donating to Carrion. There were 23 contributions in two months, including $1,000 from a construction worker.

By November 2007, 41 donations from Jackson employees to Carrion totaled $35,650. In May 2008, Carrion approved the project. Two months later, he announced he was sponsoring $3 million in taxpayer funds for the project.

• One of Carrion's largest donors and fund-raisers is Jose Velazquez, owner of Tri-Line Contracting Inc. of Manhattan. Between his employees and developers and other donors, he has raised $83,700 for Carrion.

Tri-Line is working at two of the biggest developments Carrion has championed, including the new Yankee Stadium.

Carrion signed off on it in 2005 with the caveat that the Yanks hire a big percentage of local contractors and workers. One of the contractors was Tri-Line, which is building a conference center and museum in the stadium.

• Developer Related Companies' subsidiary, BTM Development Partners, needed Carrion and the city Planning Commission to change zoning, modify height restrictions and approve permits for parking spaces.

As the project moved forward, the neighborhood railed about increased traffic and the impact the chain stores would have on local businesses. All the while Related executives wrote campaign checks to Carrion.

• In March 2008, Carrion sponsored $1 million in public funds for the Ader Group's plan to build 177 low-income rental units. On June 17, owner Israel Neiman gave Carrion $4,950, a donation Neiman said was "just coincidental."


For an administration that has promised to shun the very appearance of impropriety to bring Adolfo Carrion into the administration on the heels of the none vetting of Gov. Bill Richards, Sen. Hillary Clinton, Timothy Geithner, Eric Holder, Tom Daschle, and Nancy Killefer shows that President Obama never intended to run an ethical administration. He just said he would because he knew that is what you wanted to hear.

Note to Obama whatever you're doing in your vetting process do the opposite! You'll find it'll work better!

So much for honesty and integrity from Barack Hussein Obama, now that small matter of your original vaulted birth certificate would put us back on the path of integrity Mr. Obama! Why don’t you release it from under lock and key?

Friday, February 27, 2009

Obama creates a Department of Ghetto Affairs

Obama and Ludacris


    UNDER HERE’S SOMETHING THAT YOU DIDN’T KNOW:


Yay Boy! Luda would be proud of his boy Obama who is lookin out for the peeps in the Ghetto. It seems the first black prez just dropped by executive order the first Department of Ghetto Affairs (DOGA). Okay, okay the Office of Urban Affairs but same difference fool! (see Order)

Yea old boy didn’t even pass it through Congress he just bit-h slapped the order on America ‘cause he can do whatever he likes! This calls for a celebration (see video)



Say what? Obama is Here! Now the only thing left is that paint job on the White House! And you know that!



Obama raising the roof ya’ll

You think we can get a Department of Malt Liquor too? DOGA! Roof, roof!

Thursday, February 26, 2009

Obama’s Orwellian Address to Congress

AP – President Barack Obama addresses a joint session of Congress in the House Chamber of the Capitol in Washington,D.C.



JIM VANDEHEI and MIKE ALLEN are hereby awarded the 1st Creating Orwellian Worldview Award for outstanding reporting!

Although I, through this blog, am attempting to educate you on how to recognize Liberals and Democrats who are attempting to use language to change reality in America by legal, political and social coercion often I felt alone in this pursuit.

That may have changed! Vandehei and Allen of the Politico took time as the media to explain the Orwellian communications in the President’s Tuesday night’s address to Congress. In other words, they tell us just what Obama was really communicating. That of course, until now, would never have been done on the Obama fawning networks CBS, NBC, ABC, MSNBC, and Fox. (see story)

Obama’s nearly hour long message attempted to balance negative and positive messages while leaving all blame at the feet of President Bush and Republicans, thus allowing Obama to take up the mantle of problems that he has simply inherited due to no fault of Democrats or of his own. (see transcript)

Following are video excerpts of President Obama’s Orwellian coded rhetoric along with Vandehei’s and Allen’s translations of what the President really meant, which was published in their Politico Article entitled, “What Obama Really Meant” (see Video)



Follow is Vandehei and Allen’s article:

What Obama really meant

By JIM VANDEHEI & MIKE ALLEN | 2/25/09 12:53 AM EST

President Obama’s maiden speech to Congress was loaded with durable lines, many aimed with precision at specific audiences or political objectives. As is often the case, the most memorable lines were often written with subtlety and delicacy to keep the speech above petty politics and blame-casting.

(Note: Of course I disagree with what the authors stated here. I believe that the speech was written to give the appearance that the President is above petty politics and blame-casting when in actuality petty politics and blame-casting was exactly the speech’s intended purpose. A fact that the authors confirm that point in their very first critique --Alaphiah)

Here’s a translation of key passages:

“Now, if we’re honest with ourselves, we’ll admit that for too long we have not always met these responsibilities – as a government or as a people. I say this not to lay blame or look backwards.”

TRANSLATION: He said it precisely to lay blame right on top of George W. Bush. The entire speech was laced with shots, some more obvious than others, at the former administration. They were all harnessed to a single purpose: convince the public that every risk Obama takes or dollar he spends is to clean up the mess Bush either left behind or failed to address.

“It’s a plan that won’t help speculators or that neighbor down the street who bought a house he could never hope to afford but it will help millions of Americans who are struggling with declining home values.”

TRANSLATION: The essence of this message – “don’t listen to that blowhard Rick Santelli over at CNBC.” White House officials privately admit some reckless homeowners could benefit from their rescue package. But they want the public to see the housing rescue package as the best of many bad options for keeping property values from tanking further. They know they will lose the fight if the plan is seen as a sop to the undeserving.

“I know how unpopular it is to be seen as helping banks right now, especially when everyone is suffering in part from their bad decisions. I promise you — I get it.”

TRANSLATION: This was all about trying to prevent a populist backlash to the growing number of reckless Americans getting taxpayer bailouts. It was the chief aim of the speech. Again and again, Obama took shots at the risk-taking bankers, automakers and homebuyers. Obama wants to make sure the general public sees him as on their side – not on the side of undeserving folks who might get government money.

“You should also know that the money you've deposited in banks across the country is safe; your insurance is secure; you can rely on the continued operation of our financial system.”

TRANSLATION: This was Obama’s way of saying don’t take his recent doom and gloom language too darn seriously. Things are bad – but not devastatingly so. Bill Clinton said the president should be talking more optimistically about the country’s can-do spirit, and a big goal of the speech was to dial up the Obama version of hope. This was a start.

“History reminds us that at every moment of economic upheaval and transformation, this nation has responded with bold action and big ideas. In the midst of civil war, we laid railroad tracks from one coast to another that spurred commerce and industry.”

TRANSLATION: As Rahm Emanuel often says, never allow a good crisis to go to waste. Obama wants to use this historic downturn to enact historic policies. They are never cheap and require public buy-in to this White House’s go-big-or-go-home mentality. History always provides a nice backdrop for such experiments.

“So let there be no doubt: health care reform cannot wait, it must not wait, and it will not wait another year.”

TRANSLATION: Obama is doing health care reform this year, despite deficits and its high costs. There will be a lot of pressure - mainly from Republicans but also some centrist Democrats - to pay more attention to deficits after the recent spending spree. Obama will ignore them – and is in fact considering a push for near-universal coverage in the second half of this year.

“Let me be absolutely clear, because I know you’ll end up hearing some of the same claims that rolling back these tax breaks means a massive tax increase on the American people. If your family earns less than $250,000 a year – a quarter-million dollars a year -- you will not see your taxes increased a single dime. I repeat: not one single dime.”

TRANSLATION: Rich people will get a big fat tax increase to pay for health care and other programs – and Obama will set the terms of the political fight. That tax-hike line was straight from the campaign trail, repeated countless times for a reason. He knows he will soon find out if it was an effective approach (but probably not until next year when the tax hike will start to take effect).

“To relieve the strain on our forces, my budget increases the number of our soldiers and Marines. And to keep our sacred trust with those who serve, we will raise their pay, and give our veterans the expanded health care and benefits that they have earned.”

TRANSLATION: We may be packing up in Iraq , but we’re not wimps. Obama, while focused mostly on domestic policies these days, knows Republicans will never stop trying to paint Democrats as soft on security. Two ways Obama has projected strength, both on the campaign trail and as president, is to emphasize his plans to expand the military and to put more troops in Afghanistan .

“I know that it's easy to lose sight of this truth -- to become cynical and doubtful; consumed with the petty and the trivial.”

TRANSLATION: That would be you, Republicans, reporters or anyone else who diverts attention from the big issues by jumping into conventional political fights. This is an attempt to elevate himself as the first president of the 21st century and diminish critics as whining carpers. This worked magically on the campaign trail. The task gets harder when the cynics and critics are those outside of Washington concerned about the spending and bailouts.

“We are not quitters.”

TRANSLATION: This was the emotional moment of the night. You’d have to have a cold heart not to appreciate a young girl from a poor town telling the president “we’re not quitters.” The line also summons the spirit the White House thinks Congress and the public will need in the tough months ahead.
****

As I have said before and as I will continue to explain, absolutely nothing can be taken a face value with this administration. There are symbolic meanings and language employed with every speech, or event, or pronouncement which is meant to convey a different truth or as President Clinton was so fond of suggesting A third way.

Everything that President Obama and his seconds say should be filtered or translated as the above example. If not one day we could all wake up in some semi-Oceania state of control.

Thank you JIM VANDEHEI and MIKE ALLEN you are the 1st recipients of the Creating Orwellian Worldview award for pointing out our government’s and President Obama’s attempt to create an alternate Orwellian reality through words!

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

The Obama Constitutional Crisis is Here!

2nd Lt. Scott Easterling
"As an active-duty officer in the United States Army, I have grave concerns about the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of president of the United States, [President Obama] has absolutely refused to provide to the American public his original birth certificate, as well as other documents which may prove or disprove his eligibility.

In fact, he has fought every attempt made by concerned citizens in their effort to force him to do so. "
–2nd Lt. Scott Easterling
Before the Democratic Convention in August of 2008 Democrat Attorney Phillip Berg warned his fellow Democrats not to nomination Sen. Barack Obama because of questions regarding his edibility. Berg even filed a suit to enjoin the DNC from allowing Obama run or receive the nomination, his reason? Berg stated that he feared that if Barack Obama were elected President of the United States there would ensue a Constitution crisis because Obama had not proved that the was eligible under the U.S. Constitution to be president.
The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."
Berg filed suit in the U.S. District Court of Pennsylvania where Obama failed to respond in time which legally deemed that Obama admitted Berg’s charges were in fact true.

But instead of the judge finding for Berg the judge mysteriously dismissed the case. (see story) and here


Subsequently Berg has filed several appeals with the U.S. Supreme court which has refused to get involved in perhaps the most important case in American history.

Regardless, no matter how the government attempts to shield for Obama this case is not going away. The people deserve to know if the Congress and the Supreme Court of the United States conspired to prevent the people from knowing the true status of their government.

If Barack Obama is a usurper then the whole U.S. government is illegitimate. The Courts are illegitimate for allowing a usurper to remain unchallenged on his way to becoming and finally obtaining the presidency when it was in their power to illegally order that Obama show proof. The Congress is illegitimate because they knew of this but no one, not one Congressman or Senator took up the issue for the American people. On the Contrary the Congress willingly accepted this illegitimacy. (see story)

And naturally the Executive branch is illegitimate meaning that none of Barack Obama’s appointments, Executive Orders or selections are legitimate. Not Vice President Joe Biden, not Obama’s Cabinet and not Obama status as Commander-in-Chief.

This brings us to 2nd Lt. Scott Easterling who states that his oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America impels him to insure that he is following legitimate orders from a bona fided Commander-in-Chief, the same oath, by the way, to defend the Constitution that President Obama took but couldn’t possibly keep if he took the office knowing that he is ineligible, which he certainty must have. (see story)
"My conviction is such that I am compelled to join Dr. Orly Taitz's lawsuit, as a plaintiff, against Mr. Obama. As a citizen, it pains me to do this, but as an officer, my sworn oath to support and defend our Constitution requires this action," –2nd Lt. Scott Easterling
As President Obama is ramping up the hostilities in Afghanistan and ordering upwards to 20,000 troops into battle. (see story)

Our troops deserve to know whether or not they are following orders from a legitimate president or an imposer, an usurper who has used the Courts and the Congress to stage the strangest political coup d'état in history. And that is the taking of the United States of America without one single shot, no this coup was accomplish purely and wholly on the ignorance of the American people.

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Á la Harry Reid and John Murtha the Obama Stimulus is a Failure

Judged by his own standards, President Obama's $787 billion economic stimulus program is deeply disappointing. For weeks, Obama has described the economy in grim terms. "This is not your ordinary run-of-the-mill recession," he said at his Feb. 9 news conference. It's "the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression."

Given these dire warnings, you'd expect the stimulus package to focus almost exclusively on reviving the economy. It doesn't, and for that, Obama bears much of the blame.
So wrote Robert J. Samuelson of the Washington Post. The case for a huge stimulus Samuelson wrote, “Is to prevent a devastating downward economic spiral.” (see story)

Yet what President Obama has done according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is back load the Stimulus bill so that most of the spending occurs in 2011 or later to 2014. That’s during election years do I really have to explain why Democrats did this?

The CBO estimates that only a minuscule 3% of the money will be spent during 2009 and 2010 roughly $595 million dollars. Yet if you recall Obama said that we needed to rush and spend enough money immediately to advert impeding catastrophe possibilities. He said at his Feb. 9 news conference. It's "the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression."

But according to Samuelson Obama words are different than his actions. Hum, imagine that? Must be that deep thinking and nuance-thing that Democrats are so known for.

No it’s not, Samuelson diagnoses it as Obama’s politics are in conflict with and are compromising the economics of this country

This should have been a huge stimulus up front focused only to kick start the economy with good middle class jobs but what Obama has done, he has diluted the upfront power of the stimulus for political bragging rights in 2011 and 2014.

But what is even more devastating is what the money is being used for. According to Samuelson, [f]or starters, there's $8 billion for high-speed rail. "Everyone is saying this is [for] high-speed rail between Los Angeles and Las Vegas -- I don't know," says Ray Scheppach, executive director of the National Governors Association. Whatever's done, the design and construction will occupy many years. It's not a quick stimulus.

Then there's $20.8 billion for improved health information technology -- more electronic records and the like. Probably most people regard this as desirable, but here, too, changes occur slowly.


So what was up with all of that hurry up and now we’ve got to wait, didn’t Obama, the media and Democrats urge us all for the need too get this bill passed quickly? Yes they did.

But Samuelson writes that [b]ig projects take time. They're included in the stimulus because Obama and Democratic congressional leaders are using the legislation to advance many political priorities instead of just spurring the economy. Therefore the hurry was to get American people’s money before they knew what hit them.

Funny how Democrats always do that with any spending, remember how they attempted to load down President Bush funding of the war with their little pet pork projects, same thing! (see story)

Some politicians never learn. The purpose of the stimulus is to keep declines in one part of the economy from dragging down other sectors but to the Democrats it was just another bill to add their special little projects. Apparently no bill is too important to forego an opportunity for Democrats to add pork to it.

Finally if the economic problem is anywhere as sever as President Obama describes his stimulus package is not enough large enough to do the job. Samuelson believes that it only offers modest relief. While what it does do is centralize more power in Washington for Obama and Democrats.

Samuelson argues that no one knows how the results will bear out, but in any case it is Samuelson’s opinion that President Obama and Democrats allowed partisan politics to ran roughshod over pragmatic economic policy that this country needed in our time of crisis.

One must wonder why Obama has been so dire on the economy, so much so, that even past president Bill Clinton has asked him to lighten up. I’m thinking that Democrats know that what they’ve done will eventually fail. The Stimulus package was a failure from the start because it wasn’t designed to aid the U.S. economy. What it’s really designed to do is stimulate the Democrat election chances for 2011 and 2014.

If the economy is destroyed because of this blatant and unnecessary Democrat partisanship it’s going to take a whole lot of sweeping Democrats out of office to clean up this mess!

I say let’s get started at the very first opportunity! For Obama ONE AND DONE!
And for the midterm election in 2011 sweep corrupt and partisan Democrats out!

Monday, February 23, 2009

The President has no Clothes

Protestors line up for President Barack Obama's visit to Dobson High School Wednesday morning.
Some of the students attentively watched the speech, giving questioning looks and comments, shaking their heads and laughing at some of Obama’s words.

Other students listened, occasionally glancing up to watch, while texting on their cell phones, reading a book or finishing school work.
-- Hayley Ringle
Hans Christian Anderson’s remarkable 1837 the tale of swindlers coming into town to take advantage of people’s hubris and conformity is being played out in the Obama administration in this the 21st century.

The swindlers, tailors, thought if they could spin an elaborate ruse about fine clothing and exclusiveness (only the very enlighten would be able to see the clothing) they could make millions so the story goes.

They would have gotten clean away with the scam too without one person coming out of their politically correct imposed silence had it not been for a mere child a little boy who was not taken in by all the pretense and said it like he saw it.

“The Emperor has on no clothes!” The child proclaimed and the towns people were finally free to say what they all knew but were afraid to say from fear of appearing nonconformist and ignorant. Indeed the Emperor was parading before them in his underwear and expected them to believe that he had on clothes.

President Barack Hussein Obama recently visited Dobson High School in Mesa Arizona to tout his Economic Stimulus bill which he had just signed into law. The President and his advisors thought it wise for him to go on tour to sell the new law to the American people. (see story)
“Overall I think it’s a good idea, but he’s not addressing the issues of the economic crisis.

The spending bill he just passed is just progressing the Democratic agenda rather than addressing the economic issues in the country.”
— Syna Daudfar, Senior Advance Placement Student
Daudfar thinks Obama’s plan is backward and deals with the “less important stuff” first. “Bailing out businesses” and “providing better regulatory systems for giving out money to businesses” should have been first, he said.

“If businesses can’t afford to hire people, then people won’t be able to work and pay off their mortgages,” he said. “It’s kind of like putting money into a funnel.”


Ahh… the fresh insight of children when grown-ups are using such arguments like the President made before his loyal Democrat partisans, "So then you get the argument, well, this is not a stimulus bill, this is a spending bill. What do you think a stimulus is? (Laughter and applause.) That's the whole point. No, seriously. (Laughter.) That's the point. (Applause.) "(source)

You see President Obama readily admits "the whole point" of his "stimulus" bill is government SPENDING for Democrat purposes which many of us believe is partisan and wasteful spending! (see video)



Finally the students of Dobson High wondered why they where being used as political staging when what the President was speaking about had absolutely nothing to do with them.
The students also questioned why Obama chose their school for his speech since he wasn’t talking about education and wondered how much money the district spent on beautifying the campus while district positions and services are being cut.

District officials noted this week that the landscaping project completed over the weekend at Dobson was already in the works and was just expedited by the president’s visit. Funding came from voter-approved bonds.
-- Hayley Ringle
Get used to it kids because to this administration it seems that the whole world is a stage from which to parade naked partisanship, naked Democrat propaganda and $3.27Trillion dollar Democrat spending bills like invisible suits of clothes for the President to wear before the American people and before you at Dobson High school.

And you kids saw right though it and said, “This bill promotes the naked Democrat agenda!”

That’s right kids this President has no clothes other than naked partisanship!