“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”--Declaration of Independence
Imagine that you’re the president of the United States of America and you’re reading your teleprompter, quoting a verse from the Declaration of Independence, but suddenly you see a defect in the quote you’re about to read what do you do? Well here’s what president Barry Hussein Soetoro did. He batted his eyes several times like he couldn’t believe the defect that he was seeing and he just ignored it. He didn’t read it.
Just what was the defect? Well it been a defect in the Declaration for over two hundred years, but it took this special president to find it. Watch the president’s reaction when the defective word “Creator” appears on his teleprompter as it has always appeared in the Declaration of Independence and see his refusal to say the word. (see 1:12min video)
The line is supposed to read: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
But Obama’s recitation left out an important part: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are crated equal. [Long Pause] Endowed with certain inalienable [sic] rights: life and liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”
After President Obama says, “created equal...” there is a long pause during which he scowls and blinks several times.
This has to be the very first time that president Soetoro did not read everything on this teleprompter. It is interesting that the word he chose to misapply or ignore was a reference to God!
“Like a lot of people in my generation, I was really inspired by you and by your campaign and the message that you brought, and that inspiration is dying away. It feels like the American dream is not attainable to a lot of us, is the American dream dead for me?” —Ted Brassfield
The American Dream is essentially Dead and Barry Hussein Soetoro killed it on purpose.
The American Dream essentially was the promise of upward social and economic mobility irrespective of one’s station in life or bloodline.
In other words, the dream was that one could achieve anything, based on ones intellect, ingenuity and the sweat of one’s brow.
In the president’s weekend CNBC staged town hall meeting, he attempted to defer all blame from himself and his Party and place that blame squarely on his political foes.
However if one remembers Sen. Soetoro campaigned for the presidency on the theme of the death of the American dream, don’t you remember? He told Americans that we could no longer drive the car’s that we wanted, eat the food that we want and air condition our homes the way that we want and the rest of the world would stand by and be OK with that.
What the Senator Soetoro was advocating for was a more austere America, one with less energy, less jobs and less dreams. (:35sec video)
Senator Soetoro also threatened to bankrupt coal producing energy companies in the United States. If his threat is realized another 200,000 Americans will be out of work . (see 1:33min video)
Since Soetoro has been president he has put a “cap” on the American dream and “traded” it away by his trillions of dollars of spending, not only taking the American dream away from you and me but taking it away from our children our children’s children. For example, American Thinker's Randall Hoven points out the following:
* Obama's stimulus, passed in his first month in office, will cost more than the entire Iraq War -- more than $100 billion (15%) more.
* Just the first two years of Obama's stimulus cost more than the entire cost of the Iraq War under President Bush, or six years of that war.
* Iraq War spending accounted for just 3.2% of all federal spending while it lasted.
* Iraq War spending was not even one quarter of what we spent on Medicare in the same time frame.
* Iraq War spending was not even 15% of the total deficit spending in that time frame. The cumulative deficit, 2003-2010, would have been four-point-something trillion dollars with or without the Iraq War.
* The Iraq War accounts for less than 8% of the federal debt held by the public at the end of 2010 ($9.031 trillion).
* During Bush's Iraq years, 2003-2008, the federal government spent more on education that it did on the Iraq War. (State and local governments spent about ten times more.) (see source)
The President needs to stop lying about what he inherited was the cause of the mess we are in. On the contrary, it is what Soetoro and Democrats did when he and they gained power that caused this mess. They knew that the country didn’t have any money yet they spent trillions anyway to get us into this crisis.
The President and the Democrats spending spree was not for job creation as he promised it was advancing the most social Liberal agenda in the history of the United States.
President Soetoro’s Party and policies are making things worst, not better, in America. Everyone knows it! If you don’t then maybe the fact that, the president’s entire economic team, the one that came up with the stimulus plan, just quit. Every last one!
Things are so bad under Soetoro’s watch that in his staged CNBC town hall meeting people who voted for him and support him are asking him this question, “ Is the American Dream dead for me?” (see 1:57min Video)
Yes Virginia, with what Democrats have done to this country since they have been in total control, the American Dream is Dead for us all! Though president Soetoro tells Ted Brassfield different the reality is what Mr. Brassfield has stated. After trillions of failed stimulus. Stimulus one, two and three there are no jobs.
To prevent furthering the damage we must vote all Democrats and RINOs out in 2010 and 2012.
"I'm one of your middle class Americans. And quite frankly I'm exhausted. I'm exhausted of defending you, defending your administration, defending the mantle of change I voted for, and deeply disappointed with where we are right now,"—CNBC Townhall Supporter of president Soetoro
In a stagecrafted setting and out of a handpicked selected pro-Soetoro crowd president Barry Hussein Soetoro was put on the defensive in what was supposed to be a cutesy propaganda outing where he could tout his “accomplishments” and extend his coattails for Democrats running for reelection this November. (see article)
Instead, what happened next was an incredible PR nightmare. Out of the belly of a sycophantic assemblage… criticism and from a most unexpected source, an educated professional middle class African-American woman who says that she is exhausted of defending the president, his administration and his hope and change program that has resulted in no discernable improvement for the middle class. (see 1:21min video)
What we are supposed to forget is Democrats forced Trillions of dollars of taxpayer liabilities on the American people when America was already out of money this according to the president himself. (see previous post)
In addition, after getting their Liberal agenda through Congress Democrats spent over a Trillion dollars in stimulus dollars that were actually payoffs to Democrat constituencies and money to aid in reelecting Democrats. The fact is Democrats asked for additional $23Billion dollars for job creation and now billions of dollars more to stimulate American small businesses it has become clear that even to the most ardent Soetoro supporter the president is not looking out for the middle class.
“We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times … and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK,”—president Barry Hussein Soetoro
And yes Miss to answer your question, your future, as is all of ours that of the hot dogs and beans era under the Soetoro administration just as the president said we can’t eat as much as we want.
The worst deficit comes from a recession. And if we can take the proper action at the proper time this could be the most important step that we could take to prevent another recession that is the right kind of a tax cut both for your family budget and the national budget resulting from a permanent basic reform and reduction in our rate structure. A creative tax cut, creating more jobs, income and eventually more revenue. And the right time for that kind of bill, it now appears, in the absence of an economy crisis today, and if the job is to be in a responsible way is January 1963. —John F. Kennedy
Sometimes answers to our problems must come from the grave. Since Democrats seized Congressional power in 2004 and hijacked the presidency in 2008, they have been unwilling to listen to rational and reasonable voices concerning the economy. Instead, they have implemented policies and legislation that will produce the greatest tax increases in U.S. history.
Charles Dickens’ story, ‘A Christmas Carol’ told of a man impervious to the reality of people suffering all around him. So self-absorbed was he that it virtually took an other-world experience from ghost of the spirit world to reach him.
Today we have YouTube and video from the past instead of our more ethereal friends to contact us from the past. After Democrats have saddled the American people with Trillions upon Trillions of dollars of debt by their Stimulus packages/jobs bills, bank bailouts, etc. etc. etc. there is a voice from the past that tells president Barry Hussein Soetoro that everything that he is doing is all wrong. That voice is President John Fitzgerald Kennedy. (see 2:03 min video)
Such a bill will be presented to the Congress for action next year. It will include a across the board, top to bottom tax cut in both corporation and personal income taxes. It will include long need tax reform that logic and equity demands…The billions of dollars that this bill will create will place in the hands of the consumer and our businessmen will have both immediate and permanent benefits to our economy.
Every dollar that is released from taxation that is spent or invested will help create a new job and a new salary and these new jobs and new salaries can create other jobs and other salaries and more customers and more growth for an expanding American economy.—President John F. Kennedy
Imagine that across the board tax cuts not the middle class only, class warfare, tax cuts that president Soetoro is promoting. I guess some president want to fix our country’s problems while others only wish to fundamentally change our country for the worst.
This is but one of many, many reasons that all Democrat candidates should be turned out of office this November. Democrats have bad mouth Republicans for over 10-straight-years only to bring their failed ideas to the table, which are resulting in the ruination of the country. And no, having Conservatives in office will not be worst than what Democrats are doing, have done and will do! Past, Present and Future.
If John F. Kennedy where here that is what he would say. And he was a Democrat.
White House science adviser John Holdren speaks at the National Press Club in Washington Oct. 8, 2009.
The White House wants the public to start using the term "global climate disruption" in place of "global warming" -- fearing the latter term oversimplifies the problem and makes it sound less dangerous than it really is. –Foxnews.com
There is the story of Lemmings that went on a group run. Before the run the lead Lemming gathered the group together for some instructions.
Stay in the pack he warned and if any of you should feel that the earth is no longer underneath your feet just shout Geronimo.
One of the other Lemmings protested, “That sounds pretty suicidal to me maybe we should change the way we approach this run.”
The lead Lemming thought about it, and after a minute or two of contemplating he pronounced to the group, “We will no longer shout Geronimo while running if we feel the sensation of no ground underneath our feet. Instead you are all to shout, “Just do it!”
“Nothing suicidal sounding about that now is there!” The lead Lemming chirped. To which the other Lemmings nodded their heads collectively in affirmation and started their run.—Alaphiah
Terrorism is a “man-caused disaster”. The Global war on terror is the "overseas contingency operations" And Global warming first became “Climate Change” and now the Obama administration is asking us to call it, "global climate disruption.” Enough!I won't do it. I’m not going to stop calling global warming—global warming because Al Gore and proponents of this nonsense don’t want to be reminded just how wrong they were about the Earth heating up due to CO2 emissions.
Re-branding is a tool that is used often to deceive or cover up or cause one to forget about an error or failure.
In the early 2000’s SUV tire blowouts dominated the News. The tire most closely associated with the blowouts was Firestone tires. Remarkably Firestone did not stop making tires they simply rebranded. Firestone changed the way that they referred to their tire. Firestone became Bridgestone, exactly like the Soetoro administration wishes Global warming to become global climate disruption, same old debunked retreaded theory but with a different name.
After reading White House science adviser John Holdren stated reason for wanting to change the language with which we refer to the debunked theory of greenhouse CO2 gases getting trapped into the earth’s atmosphere causing the rays of the sun to also be trapped heating up the atmosphere to ever increasing temperatures. There is no wonder why the Soetoro administration wishes to abandon the de-bunked theory of Global warming in name; they wish to do this because the evidence clearly shows the theory is wrong. (see article)
It could be worst the Soetoro administration could use NASA’s suggestion, which is re-branding Climate change to, "inadvertent climate modification." Inadvertent Climate Modification? Yeah right. I’m sure that along with NASA’s new mission to make Muslims feel good about Muslim contributions to the history of humanity rebranding Global warming is also a top priority in Soetoro’s New NASA.
Barack Obama is the most antibusiness president in a generation, perhaps in American history. Thanks to him the era of big government is back. Obama runs up taxpayer debt not in the billions but in the trillions. He has expanded the federal government's control over home mortgages, investment banking, health care, autos and energy. The Weekly Standard summarizes Obama's approach as omnipotence at home, impotence abroad.
The President's actions are so bizarre that they mystify his critics and supporters alike. —Dinesh D’souza
Or It isn’t because he’s Black Stupid!
When Barry Hussein Soetoro first burst upon the campaign trail he was too cute by half pointing out the fact that he was a Black candidate. He claimed Senator John McCain and Republicans where saying, “You know, he's not patriotic enough, he's got a funny name, you know, he doesn't look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills." When Senator McCain called Senator Soetoro on it, by saying that Mr. Soetoro was using the “Race Card,” first Soetoro’s campaign denied it but later on they did own up to it. Yes Soetoro was alluding to his Race by those remarks (see source)
You see it has always been about Race but not because of the Republicans or White people, no the Race conversation that we’ve been engage in these last 20 months of the Soetoro presidency has been one that President Soetoro has been haunted by in his head. A haunting which he is so obsessed with that he wrote an entire book about it entitled, “Dreams From my Father a story of Race and Inheritance.”
Dinesh D’souza in his article, “How Obama Thinks” attributes all that we have seen president Soetoro do, though out of sync with the traditions and beliefs of America, are totally in line with the traditions and dreams of his Kenyan born Luo Tribesman and anti-Colonists father Barack Obama Sr. (see article)
Anticolonialism is the doctrine that rich countries of the West got rich by invading, occupying and looting poor countries of Asia, Africa and South America. As one of Obama's acknowledged intellectual influences, Frantz Fanon, wrote in The Wretched of the Earth, "The well-being and progress of Europe have been built up with the sweat and the dead bodies of Negroes, Arabs, Indians and the yellow races."
Anticolonialists hold that even when countries secure political independence they remain economically dependent on their former captors. This dependence is called neocolonialism, a term defined by the African statesman Kwame Nkrumah (1909--72) in his book Neocolonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism. Nkrumah, Ghana's first president, writes that poor countries may be nominally free, but they continue to be manipulated from abroad by powerful corporate and plutocratic elites. These forces of neocolonialism oppress not only Third World people but also citizens in their own countries. Obviously the solution is to resist and overthrow the oppressors. This was the anticolonial ideology of Barack Obama Sr.—Dinesh D’souza
We in fact have a president that is an Anticolonist. But what is important to understand is he views America as a Colonial power that has oppressed non-White people and stolen it’s wealth from the non-White people of the third world.
What this means is, and we get this from president Soetoro’s own writings, the conversation that we are having about Race is not because Mr. Soetoro skin color is black.
No, the conversation we are having is because the dreams from president Soetoro father, Barack Obama, Sr. are dreams of taking back from the White man everything that he has stolen from non-White people of the world, in other and more familiar words, “To fundamentally change America.”
This conversation has nothing to do with president Soetoro’s skin color. But it has everything to do with the way he thinks. Everything that the president has done up to this point suggests that he is hell bend on putting the dreams of a Luo Tribesman who was an avowed Anticolonist into full affect in America.
What that means is America will be summarily stripped of it’s wealth and that wealth will be transferred back to its rightful non-White owners. Bottom line Soetoro plans to spread the wealth around. In fact, he’s already doing that. What this president is doing isn’t because he’s Black in the sense of a Black African-American.
No what this president is doing is because he has loyalties to the third world and Africa in ways that the Founding Fathers tried to prevent when they wrote Article II of the U.S. Constitution stating that only a natural born citizen can be president of the United States of America. The Founding Fathers were attempting to prevent the case of dual loyalties that we see conflicting in the person of Barry Hussein Soetoro. (see previous post)
President Soetoro’s father’s dreams, the dreams of a dead African who hated White economic and political power are being actualized in the White house in the form of his son, his son is acting on dreams to take back from the White man and give back to the non-White people.
The problems that we are facing in America today ain’t because president Soetoro is Black, it’s because he doesn’t think like us.
This president, the one, that doesn’t look like the other presents on the dollars bills doesn’t think like them either. Again, he doesn't think like us either.
He doesn’t think like those of us who believe in America, love America and those of us who will defend and fight for the American dream, which incidentally is a dream from our Founding Fathers and every generation of American fathers after them.
[Democrat]Representative Mark Schauer of Michigan does not dwell on the legislation he has voted for during his first term in Congress, which includes the Democratic stimulus plan and health insurance overhaul…
Representative Glenn Nye of Virginia does not mention in his television advertisements that he is a Democrat. But he expresses a deep worry about the national debt…
[Democrat] Representative Suzanne M. Kosmas of Florida looks straight into the camera during her latest commercial and declares, “People in this district are mad, and I’m mad, too.”
The advertisements from these three vulnerable Democrats offer a window into the party’s strategy to try to keep control of the House in November—Jeff Zeleny
They were so proud to be a part of the Progressive movement when they shoved comprehensive health care reform down the throats of Americans. It was as if a wooden tongue depressor was shoveled down way to deep. And with “Tiger Woods” fist pumps they celebrated the passage of the law, which forced Americans to say “ahhh,” a gag response to a foreign implement.
Are they proud now? Mmmm not so much.
They were flying high like twin tower bound Boeing 767’s when they passed the $787Billion dollar to $1 Trillion dollar stimulus package. Don’t forget that, Democrats passed the $26Billion dollars Jobs Stimulus package. The $700Billion dollar Bank bailouts were pasted and when they took over the Auto Industry
Are they proud now? Mmmm not so much.
According to New York Times, JEFF ZELENY Democrats are running away from their historic “accomplishments.” (see article)
Two years after arriving in Washington on a message of hope and change, Democratic candidates are NOT extolling their party’s accomplishments, but rather they are distancing themselves from their party’s agenda.—Jeff Zeleny
The conundrum in which Democrats find themselves is after they pursued the most radical Progressive Socialist agenda in the history of the United States of America, an agenda that was against the will of the majority of the America people, how are they reelected. In town hall meetings in the summer of 2009, the American people warned Democrats all across the country and told them in no uncertain terms not to pass health care legislation.
Instead they decided to follow their radical Partisan leadership, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and President Barry Hussein Soetoro—leadership that mistook their voter fraud and voter deception laden presidential win as a mandate to divest America of all of its traditional moorings by trekking out on a purely European like failed model of big government Socialism.
Insultingly, Democrats believe that all they have to do is lie to the America people. Democrats believe Americans to be so stupid, that in an election year a simple change of Democrat messaging as well as the pretence that it isn’t Democrats who are spending America into oblivion. And then “hocus pocus” certain Democrats can disassociate from the Democrat Brand. That, Democrats believe, will be enough to return Democrats to power to continue their Progressive Liberal Socialist remaking of America.
Democrat Representatives Mark Schauer, Glenn Nye and Suzanne M. Kosmas are examples of how Democrats in November of 2010 will transform themselves into anti-Democrat incumbents and run against their own party. Here’s a thought if the Democrat Party isn’t good enough for Democrats to claim while running for office in November 2010 then why would any American vote for a Democrat?
The number of people in the U.S. who are in poverty is on track for a record increase on President Barack Obama's watch, with the ranks of working-age poor approaching 1960s levels that led to the national war on poverty. -- HOPE YEN and LIZ SIDOTI
Hispanics and Blacks were made poorer under president Barry Hussein Soetoro’s economic policies according to census demographers and poverty is making record historic gains under Soetoro as well. (see article)
Michael Savage calls it trickle up poverty. president Barry Hussein Soetoro says we’re on the right track. However demographers who track poverty trends say that poverty in the United States is on the increase like no other time since 1959. Is that really the right track Mr. president?
Should those estimates hold true, some 45 million people in this country, or more than 1 in 7, were poor last year. It would be the highest single-year increase since the government began calculating poverty figures in 1959. The previous high was in 1980 when the rate jumped 1.3 percentage points to 13 percent during the energy crisis.—Hope Yen and Liz Sidoti
It’s no wonder a desperate president Soetoro is finger pointing at Republicans.
But for what, all of the president’s backed failed fiscal policies have been forced through by a partisan Democrat Congress. This president has gotten everything that he’s asked for in terms of economic stimulus; $700billion dollar bailout, $787Billion dollar to $1Trillion dollar stimulus, $26Billion dollar jobs/Stimulus so just what is the president belly aching about?
Oh yes it’s two months from elections and there’s no president Bush to blame so blame John Boehner? Is John Boehner the new Bush Mr. president?
One thing about finger pointing Mr. Soetoro while you’re pointing one finger three fingers are pointing right back at you. Mr. Boehner has not been able to affect anything that you and Democrats have wanted to do Mr. Soetoro. You’ve gotten your policies passed you can’t blame their failure on anyone else.
Your policies, Mr. president, have created poverty the likes that we haven’t seen in America since 1959. Now it’s evident what fundamental change means. And now it’s evident that putting Democrats in complete control is a detriment to the economic health and freedom of our country.
Democrats must be voted out in November to stop the economic bleeding and the further erosion of the United States economic infrastructure.
And we are very engaged with the Muslim world, very engaged. And our security is really number one. Our National security our personal security is extremely important and this issue has become now a National Security issue therefore in our conversations, in our decision making process we have to weigh many, many factors and that has been dominate among them. —Imam Faisel Abdul Rauf, CNN interview why Ground Zero Mosque must be built
With a voice and delivery as smooth as black velvet Imam Faisel Abdul Rauf is a yellow happy face button pinned on the Muslim Salwar Kameez, the long blousy suit of radical Islam.
Proving that there are no moderates in Islam but only these who present a happy face for terrorists and fanatics who would just as soon kill so-called moderates as they would kill non-Muslims if “moderates” get in their way and do not serve these fanatics’ purposes as Imam Rauf does.
Imam Rauf is the sole reason that we have a Ground Zero controversy. It was his idea to build and promote a $100million dollar Mosque near the site of ground zero. Anyone who has been a part of a church with a building fund knows that there is no way that Faisel Abdul and his small congregation could fund such a project in a million years, obviously the Imam planned to solicit funds from outside his congregation and perhaps outside of the United States of America. Now I ask you what kind of country would have the resources and money to fund a $100 million dollar Islamic venture?
Maybe Nancy Pelosi should call for an investigation concerning where the money to fund this Mosque would come from, rather than her misguided call to investigate Americans who oppose this offense to everything that America represents.
Imam Rauf explains to Soledad O'Brien that the Ground Zero Mosque must be built as a matter of National Security to placate Islamism terrorists. This is the smoothest threat of Islamic terrorism that has ever been broadcast. O’Brien and her network obviously didn’t even notice the smooth threat of Islamic Fatwa if the Imam’s plans to build his $100 million monument to terrorism near ground zero are in anyway thwarted or hindered. Can you see the Imam’s veiled threats in his remarks below?
If we move [the Cordova Ground Zero Mosque] from that location, the story will be that the radicals have taken over the discourse. The Headlines in the Muslim world will be that Islam is under attack. And I’m less concerned about the radicals in American than I’m concerned about the radicals in the Muslim World [… ] The danger from the radical of the Muslim world to our National Security, to the National Security of our troops… I have a niece who works [unintelligible] serving in Iraq… the concern for American citizens who live and work and travel overseas would increasingly be compromised. If the Radicals are strengthen and if we do move it, it’ll strengthen the argument of Radicals to recruit, their ability to recruit and their increasing aggression and violence.—Imam Faisel Abdul Rauf (see 3:09min video)
We are now today where the Jewish Community and the Catholic community was maybe 70 years, a century ago and this is our time this is our turn to do that […]The biggest issue is a national security issue. Without making it look like both in this country and in the Muslim world… you must remember Soledad and Americans must remember that what we do is watch all over the world, all over the world.—Imam Faisel Abdul Rauf
Now if one wishes to see what is behind the “Happy Face” of Islam one most see what Muslims are saying behind our backs or if we are lucky enough a Muslim will actually tell us what they intend to do because unlike us Muslims are not afraid because their religion is the religion of terrorism. This is not what I say, this is what frank Muslims say.
In the United Kingdom, one such Muslim is Anjem Choudary, a leading Muslim radical. Choudary says Islam is NOT a "religion of peace", but rather that Jihad and the killing of Christians and Jews are authorized by the Koran. (see 6:32mins video)
What is disconcerting is that our president chooses to present the “Happy Face” of Islam on 9/11/10 to an unsuspecting American general public while Islam lays the seeds for the entire upheaval of the American way of life. (see 2:52 min video)
As Imam Rauf said, Muslims believe that now this is their time, this is their turn in human history. As we have seen in Darfur where Muslims have butchered and raped innocent African Christians and other non-Muslim countries once Islam gains a foothold into a country no other religion no other law and no other government is permitted or tolerated by Islam.
It is disgraceful that our President used 9/11/10 as a platform, a gateway, a dirty needle with which to introduce a social virus as deadly as HIV-AIDS into the American bloodstream of freedom and secular government.
Advocating for the terrorist religion of Islam is just what Barry Hussein Soetoro did at the Pentagon on September 11, 2010 when he surreptitiously advocated for the Ground Zero Mosque.
It is evident that Imam Rauf is not the only voice that speaks in smooth velvety tones for the religion of fatwa and jihads.
We have elected representatives in this country that use the same velvety glove which Imam Rauf uses to strike the American face.
Our own officials strike us with velvety rhetoric for the support of Islam setting up a future American Darfur situation, if not that then a Islam vs. European situation in the very near future.
As Democrats brace for a November wave that threatens their control of the House, party leaders are preparing a brutal triage of their own members in hopes of saving enough seats to keep a slim grip on the majority.
In the next two weeks, Democratic leaders will review new polls and other data that show whether vulnerable incumbents have a path to victory. If not, the party is poised to redirect money to concentrate on trying to protect up to two dozen lawmakers who appear to be in the strongest position to fend off their challengers. --Jeff Zeleny and Carl Hulse New York Times
If the people are dissatisfied with the leadership of their government should the government fight to thwart the will of the people?
If the legitimate source of authority of the government is the people (and it is) then any action that the government would take to foil the people’s will should be seen as inappropriately seditious.
Therefore, any talk of a “firewall” by Democrats or any actions by Democrats to use a collective pool of money, government or private, to fight against the people, interferes with the natural normal working of the election process. (see article)
This seemingly innocuous manipulation is in fact iniquitous because it disguises political contempt for the people’s will, while the political class shores up its power against the people by unscrupulous political machinations.
Case in point, Democrats stand to face electoral repudiation and possibly lose control of the House of Representatives for their “In yo Face” style of, we won the 2008 elections so we are going to fundamentally change America .
Americans are now seeing what it means to have Democrats control the country, Health Care Reform thrust upon us, bailout of Banks and Auto Industry that we did not want, $1Trillion dollar stimulus package that didn’t work to save or create jobs, stealing money from our posterity and corrupting the federal government.
Democrats are making the government a lawless tyrannous Fascist arm of an Oligarchy of special interest groups, Amerians have rejected this apocalyptic Progressive Socialist vision of America and all indications are people want to reject Democrats this November in mass.
There is no greater dis-respecters of religion than the United States and Islam. Just look at their mutual opposition to Christianity and Islams opposition other religions. Islam disrepects every other religion and even it's own religion as Sunni is against Shiite and al Qaeda Muslims will kill other Muslims. Therefore Islam should expect no special treatment. Your piss Mohammad, Elephant Dung Mohammad and homosexual Mohammad awaits. If Jesus whom Americans claim to venerate was so disrespected Americans will do it also to your Prophet (PBUH)--Alaphiah
What does the Piss Christ, the Elephant Dung Virgin Mary and the ground zero Mosque have in common? Actually they have several things in common.
First not one Muslim protested these events when they occurred. Second, in America though many many people disagreed with the expression of all three, an equal amount of, if not more, people defended the rights of all involved to express their rights of free speech or the right to build a Mosque at ground zero.
Though Jesus Christ is considered a prophet of Islam (PBUH) when the crucifix was submerged in urine not one Muslim riot broke out around the world. No shouts of, “Death to Art!” “Death to the Artist” could be heard. Not one! Yet when a cartoon caricature depicting the Prophet Mohammed was drawn the whole Muslim world rioted and issued death threats and Fatwahs against the cartoon artist.
Furthermore, the Quran honors the Virgin Mary as the Mother of Jesus but when her likeness was rendered in Elephant excrement not one Muslim riot broke out. Not one!
When an Imam unveiled plans to build a Mosque at the foot of ground zero to open on 9/11/11 nothing but arguments were heard from Muslims and non Muslims alike about the rights to have a Mosque built near ground zero no matter how may people such a thing would offend.
So now burning the Quran is proposed on 9/11/10 and you would think by all of the bawling from as far as General Petraeus in Afghanistan to the Whitehouse west of the Potomac that someone was proposing burning the American flag!
Speaking of the American flag I was looking at the News last night and saw it burning and being stomped on while shouts of “Death to America ” went up all around it. I’m still waiting on comments from the General and the Whitehouse concerning such disguising behavior as burning the American flag and shouting death to America. Of course, I won't hold my breath.
In addition to that the U.S. government has already particapated in burning Bibles in Afghanistan (see 2:02min video)
My understanding is that the Leadership confiscated these bibles so they could not be distributed here in Afghanistan. And it was their best judgment at the time that the best way to deal with it was to destroy them. And I understand that they were burned. --Colonel Greg Julian
Whether one supports the burning of the Quran or not, I think Mayor Bloomberg or some advocate of building the Mosque at ground zero should step forward and defend Pastor Terry Jones and his Church’s RIGHT to burn the Quran just as vehemently as they defended Muslim’s rights to build a Mosque at ground zero! That would be only fair.(see article)
Remember it’s the “right” that is important not the fact that people are offended. That’s what we’re being told regarding that Mosque near ground zero. So naturally one would expect the same attitude regarding the burning of the Quran. Right?
"Let me be clear: As a citizen, and as President, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country that includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan , in accordance with local laws and ordinances. This is America , and our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakeable."—president Barry Hussein Soetoro (source)
Muslims have the Right… Isn’t that what president Barry Hussein Soetoro said at his Iftar dinner during Ramadan? The president went on to say that allowing the Islamic center to be built so near the site of devastating attack is a hallmark of being American.
Well if you agree with the president then you must agree that burning the Quran on 9/11/10, too is a hallmark of being American.
We live in a Country of Rights. You build a Mosque at ground zero, someone burns Qurans and we all have exercised our “Rights” to be American. Nobody can be mad at that. Right?
Death to all who wishes Death on Americans expressing their Rights!
Vowing to find new ways to stimulate the sputtering economy, President Barack Obama will call for long-term investments in the nation’s roads, railways and runways that would cost at least $50 billion.—Washington AP
New ways? Why Mr. president you’re touting the same old rehashed infrastructure propaganda that got us into this mess in the first place! If Republicans drove the economy into a ditch as Mr. Soetoro pointed out then his stimulus packages has launch our economy on to an unknown asteroid which we may never see coming this way again.
When the president first announced the $787 Billion dollar stimulus package a year ago, which incidentally has ballooned to about $1Trillion dollars, he say it was for shovel ready good green jobs as well as building roads, bridges and the country’s infrastructure. (see 1:46min video)
Then he called for a second stimulus, called a jobs bill, which he got an additional $26Billion dollars (see previous post)
Now he’s calling for a third stimulus, at least $50billion more for starters, to do what? To start an infrastructure bank and create jobs in the near future (next year). I’m not kidding. This third bite of the apple would be for rebuilding 150,000 miles of roads; constructing and maintaining 4,000 miles of railways, enough to go coast-to-coast; and rehabilitating or reconstructing 150 miles of airport runways, while also installing a new air navigation system designed to reduce travel times and delays. Why the same old things that he said the first $1 Trillion dollars was for in the previous video (see 1:36min video)
If you don’t remember, the first stimulus was allocated as follows:
• $50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts
• $380 million in the Senate bill for the Women, Infants and Children program
• $300 million for grants to combat violence against women
• $2 billion for federal child-care block grants
• $6 billion for university building projects
• $15 billion for boosting Pell Grant college scholarships
• $4 billion for job-training programs, including $1.2 billion for “youths” up to the age of 24
• $1 billion for community-development block grants
• $4.2 billion for “neighborhood stabilization activities”
• $650 million for digital-TV coupons; $90 million to educate “vulnerable populations”
• $145 billion for “Making Work Pay” tax credits
• $83 billion for the earned income credit
• $150 million for the Smithsonian
• $34 million to renovate the Department of Commerce headquarters
• $500 million for improvement projects for National Institutes of Health facilities
• $44 million for repairs to Department of Agriculture headquarters
• $350 million for Agriculture Department computers
• $88 million to help move the Public Health Service into a new building
• $448 million for constructing a new Homeland Security Department headquarters
• $600 million to convert the federal auto fleet to hybrids
• $450 million for NASA (carve-out for “climate-research missions”)
• $600 million for NOAA (carve-out for “climate modeling”)
• $1 billion for the Census Bureau
• $4.5 billion for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
• $850 million for Amtrak
• $87 million for a polar icebreaking ship
• $1.7 billion for the National Park System
• $55 million for Historic Preservation Fund
• $7.6 billion for “rural community advancement programs”
• $150 million for agricultural-commodity purchases
• $150 million for “producers of livestock, honeybees, and farm-raised fish”
• $2 billion for renewable-energy research ($400 million for global-warming research)
• $2 billion for a “clean coal” power plant in Illinois
• $6.2 billion for the Weatherization Assistance Program
• $3.5 billion for energy-efficiency and conservation block grants
• $3.4 billion for the State Energy Program
• $200 million for state and local electric-transport projects
• $300 million for energy-efficient-appliance rebate programs
• $400 million for hybrid cars for state and local governments
• $1 billion for the manufacturing of advanced batteries
• $1.5 billion for green-technology loan guarantees
• $8 billion for innovative-technology loan-guarantee program
• $2.4 billion for carbon-capture demonstration projects
• $4.5 billion for electricity grid
Somewhere in all of the above Soetoro promised jobs to fix the jobs infrastructure one year ago. It didn’t happen so where is the money and why does Soetoro need over $50 billion dollars more when he already has over $136Billion Dollars held in reserve out of $275 Billion allotted for jobs creation from the original $1 Trillion dollars. (source)
The fact is, the [first] stimulus package has been a remarkable failure when it comes to creating new jobs. The Obama administration claims that the stimulus spending created or saved 640,329 jobs by the last quarter of 2009. Given the $275 billion from the stimulus devoted to programs to create jobs that means every new job costs the American taxpayer $429,000. According to Census Bureau numbers, in 2008 the median wage for full-time jobs was $37,115. With benefits, let’s round this up generously to $50,000. If the stimulus money were being spent as efficiently as private-sector money is, the stimulus should have created nearly 5.5 million jobs.
According to figures at the administration’s own Web site, recovery.gov, of that $275 billion originally allocated for job creation, as of today, only about half has been spent--$139 billion. --Mary Kate Cary (source)
All of the lies that are being told by this administration, “If we would just let a Democrat controlled Congress and a Democrat President spend the money of our children and our children’s children we would have good green shovel ready jobs that would repair our infrastructure and fix our economy.” Here, here, here and here.
It didn’t happen, the first stimulus didn’t work and now Soetoro is asking for more money, another Stimulus?
In addition to that, we’re being told that Soetoro’s handpicked top Economic advisor didn’t know what she was doing. Therefore, she’s quitting and going back to the profession one is employed in when one can’t do.
Christina Romer, chairman of President Obama's Council of Economic Advisers has quit effective September 3, 2010. She is going back to teaching.
According to Lori Montgomery reporter for Washington Post, Romer was instrumental in crafting the $862 billion economic stimulus package that Obama signed shortly after being sworn into office. She co-wrote a paper that predicted the stimulus would prevent unemployment rates from rising above 8 percent (source)
According to Washington Post’s Dana Milbank, Ms. Romer had no idea how bad the economic collapse would be. She still doesn't understand exactly why it was so bad. The response to the collapse was inadequate. And she doesn't have much of an idea about how to fix things. (source)
Her boss thinks he knows that’s why he’s calling for a third stimulus package in the amount of over $50billion dollars when the first two didn’t work. This one won’t either.
The video I’m about to share is disturbing to say the least. France is home to the Eiffel tower. There are no twin towers in France that Islamic terrorists can crash two Boeing767’s into but they do have a ground zero Mosque.
How is that possible you ask? It’s possible because like America France has allowed Islam to manipulate its laws and turn those laws against it. France’s Liberal politically correct laws have aided in its own sacking. France portends what is due to occur in the United States because the exact same Liberal politically correct thinking has ensconced itself firmly in the seats of power in the United States of America.
France’s ground zero Mosque has no walls like America’s ground zero Mosque will, at least not yet. The only thing that is left is for the French to allow an actual Mosque where Muslims have illegally decided to gather to pray, right in the middle of the streets of France. (see 5min video)
Alarming? Why should it be, after all Muslims have a Constitutional right to establish Islamic rule in the United States similar the Islamic rule that they’ve already established in the streets of France.
The ground zero Mosque in New York is the gateway from which Islamists will launch their Islamification of the United States. France’s ground zero, Muslims showing their power by publicly broadcasting the Azan, the Muslim call to prayer, followed by their illegal prayer in the streets of France foreshadows what the ground zero Mosque represent for the United States.
Americans seem to be oblivious to the phased timed-release attack on America by Islam, first by air, second by Constitutional exploitation and third by Sharia Law. Islamification of America can only be successful if Americans purposely ignore the forewarning in the country and the streets of France.
Islam means submission that is exactly what France is doing. America next?
U.S. Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-CA) and U.S. Congressman Charles Rangel (D-NY)
Charles Rangel (D-NY), Maxine Waters (D-CA) and Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-TX) are all facing ethic charges in a Democrat controlled Congress on charges brought by a Democrat controlled Ethics Panel. This is historic, never were ethic hearing held simultaneously in the history of Congress. Interestingly enough, it had to happen under Nancy Pelosi’s watch. In what Pelosi characterized as the most ethical Congress in history.
Rangel and Waters know Democrats will face possible defeat if these hearings go forward openly so they’ve purposely opted to have their hearings public in order to put pressure on their fellow Democrats. Rangel and Waters are hoping that Democrats will concede and withdraw the charges of corruption against them instead of jeopardizing control of the House in an election year, too late though, these charges are already public that makes it virtually impossible for Democrats to dismiss the cases.
It is so late for Rangel that president Barry Hussein Soetoro has already thrown the Congressman under the bus, following is a video-line of Democrats taking control of Congress, Democrat’s promise to be the most ethic Congress in history and the reality of Democrat corruption.
Nancy Pelosi: the most ethical Congress in history 3:14mins
Nancy Pelosi: Drain the Swamp :28secs
Charles Rangel (D-NY) Ways and Means Chairman: Charged with corruption 9:59mins
President Soetoro wishes Rangel would leave with dignity :24secs
Maxine Waters (D-CA): Charged with corruption 1:17mins
Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Tx) Charged with corruption 9:01mins
According to Austin Cline, Regional Director for the Council for Secular Humanism and a former Publicity Coordinator for the Campus Freethought Alliance, when Friedrich Nietzsche wrote those words, Nietzsche didn't mean the death of a literal god, but the death of the shared cultural belief in a god in Europe.
Certainly the empirically driven scientific method has not failed but thanks to Mr. Gore and the corporate interest that used the name of science attempting to force a multi-trillion dollar global tax scheme upon the world’s people, science has been forever knocked off of its pedestal of unquestionability .
Forever forward when one hears something presented as a scientific fact, one will be forced to ask, “Who’s behind the science and what is their motive?” Al Gore made apolitical science political.
There is no longer just science, Gore has introduce a virulent strain of hard Left wing science by which crazed manifesto writing eco-terrorist live and die by. (see articles here and here)
[Eco-terrorist James] Lee said at the time that he experienced an ‘‘awakening” when he watched former Vice President Al Gore’s environmental documentary ‘‘An Inconvenient Truth.”-- msnbc.com
Therefore, cultural belief that all science is above reproach as well as the belief that science should be regarded as the final authority in all things is dead.
God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?
—Nietzsche, The Gay Science, Section 125, tr. Walter Kaufmann
Matt Patterson’s article “Meltdown of the climate ‘consensus’” summarizes the tale of two scientific bodies that were and remain at the center of attempting the most cataclysm paradigm shift in recent history, “The Global Warming” scare.
Patterson explains how The United Nations’ IPCC and the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia attempted to fraudulently convince the world’s populace of the claim that if a world tax was not allowed, we would all die. These two “scientific bodies” presented this conclusion as a consensus of scientific fact supported by all legitimate scientists. (see article)
The “evidence” and argument was if mankind did not change the way we consume energy mankind would be the cause of the plant’s destruction was based on bogus science. It was all based on Left wing political science not empirical science.
Was science even a real concern for the IPCC? In January, the Sunday Times of London reported that, based in large part on the fraudulent glacier story, "[IPCC Chairman] Rajendra Pachauri's Energy and Resources Institute, based in New Delhi, was awarded up to 310,000 pounds by the Carnegie Corp. . . . and the lion's share of a 2.5 million pound EU grant funded by European taxpayers."
Science is Dead and Al Gore invented partisan political science to replace it. It’s all about money now. Thus making everything we know subject to one’s political subjective point of view instead of objective empirical research.
[What was the President’s Oval Office speech about?] Was it about Iraq , as we were led to expect, or was it about Afghanistan , as we were not led to expect? Was it about the economy, which the president mentioned, or education, which he also mentioned?
Could it have been directed at Iraqis, whom the president praised in terms they would not have recognized, or was it about our troops, whom the president praised over and over again -- a kind of rhetorical tick that suggested he had run out of things to say?
As a speech, Obama delivered a version of the pudding once served Winton Churchill. “Pray, remove it,” he supposedly said. “It lacks theme.”-- Richard Cohen (source)
If you are anything like me, after hearing the president’s Oval office speech you may be wondering why president Soetoro felt that he needed to give such a speech. As you probably surmised, this speech was not to announce the end of the Iraq war though he did certainly announce a “New Dawn” in the manner in which America, under his leadership, plans to invite attack from those who declared war on America .
Obviously the “turn the page” media meme echoing at us throughout the day suggest that.
No, this was a campaign speech broadcast from the Oval Office of the White house.
This was a campaign speech which was designed to make mention of all of the president’s “accomplishments”. But what this speech really was—was a chest thump and snort signifying to Americans that Mr. Soetoro fulfilled his campaign promise to end the war. (see 17:56mins
video)
This was my pledge to the American people as a candidate for this office. Last February, I announced a plan that would bring our combat brigades out of Iraq , while redoubling our efforts to strengthen Iraq ’s Security Forces and support its government and people.
That’s what we’ve done […] Ending this war is not only in Iraq ’s interest -- it’s in our own. The United States has paid a huge price to put the future of Iraq in the hands of its people. We have sent our young men and women to make enormous sacrifices in Iraq , and spent vast resources abroad at a time of tight budgets at home. We’ve persevered because of a belief we share with the Iraqi people -- a belief that out of the ashes of war, a new beginning could be born in this cradle of civilization. Through this remarkable chapter in the history of the United States and Iraq , we have met our responsibility. Now, it’s time to turn the page. –president Barry Hussein Soetoro
This was quintessential Barry Hussein Soetoro. He was attempting to extend his coattails to the, quivering in their boots, Democrat Party by looking America squarely in the eyes and by asking the America people the question, “Who you gonna believe, about how things are going, me or your lying unemployed American eyes. See I ended the war give me my due!”
This was a campaign speech and campaigning is what this president does best according to former DNC chairman Howard Dean. This president is always campaigning none stop if Dean is to be believed. Dean even named the phenomenon as the “Permanent Campaign” (see previous post)
Even though I know that president, Soetoro politicizes everything what bothered me the most is how this twisted political hack of a president used former president Bush. First Soetoro called president Bush earlier that day so that he could say in his speech that he spoke to president Bush and then he said this:
I’m mindful that the Iraq war has been a contentious issue at home. Here, too, it’s time to turn the page. This afternoon, I spoke to former President George W. Bush. It’s well known that he and I disagreed about the war from its outset. Yet no one can doubt President Bush’s support for our troops, or his love of country and commitment to our security. As I’ve said, there were patriots who supported this war, and patriots who opposed it. And all of us are united in appreciation for our servicemen and women, and our hopes for Iraqis’ future.—president Barry Hussein Soetoro
There are just so many things wrong with this mischaracterization of Bush, that president Soetoro borders on psychosis. First, there was not a disagreement between the two men as if they were mutual friends or colleagues. Bush was president and he was making decisions for the nation whereas Senator Obama was touting the partisan Democrat Party line of anti-war and anti-Bush.
Second, for president Soetoro to intimate that because his opinion differed from president Bush’s that in turn would be cause for someone to doubt president Bush’s support for the troops, Bush’s love of country and Bush’s commitment to our security is simply diabolical
In the minds of a majority of Americans president, Bush’s patriotism was never ever in question as president Soetoro attempted to intimate. However, the same cannot be said of the current president then and now.
What’s more, there is not and never was the false parallel that president Soetoro has constructed between those who supported the war and those who were against it, those who supported the war where supporting the war because they thought it was the right thing to do for America. On the other hand, those who were against the war used the war primarily as a tool to drum up discontent against president Bush and the Republicans.
Democrats did it to attempt to win elections, in other words opposition to the war was done to score political points. No, I reject the notion that there were patriots on both sides of the argument, especially when Democrats who opposed the war were willing to lose the war in other to win the White house.
There can be no question that whatever the underlining matters that were presented by president Soetoro on Tuesday night; the war, the economy and jobs the focus of this speech was Barry Hussein Soetoro. This was a campaign speech, this was the president campaigning to savage November 2010 for Democrats and 2012 for himself. That is what this Oval office speech was about.
