Showing posts with label Reverse Sexism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reverse Sexism. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 06, 2007

Show me yours and I’ll Show you mine: Politics of Hillary Clinton

Maureen Dowd


Maureen Dowd’s “Gift of Gall” is as warped a piece of liberal logic as one could ever imagine.

Dowd’s “You go girl,” salute to Hillary Clinton for Clinton’s attempt to have it all ways in the Democrat Debates is a disturbing insight into the degenerate thinking of the Liberal mind.

Dowd’s high praise for the unscrupulousness of Hillary Clinton forever makes the point that Liberals are debased unethical creatures of justification; anything and everything can be justified by running it through a liberal’s mind.

At first read Dowd’s commentary seems to be a tongue-in-cheek barb at Senator Clinton but three-fourths down the column you find yourself saying, hey wait a minute she’s really serious here for example, Dowd’s opening salvo:
I must rush to a sister’s defense.

Women need to rally to support Hillary and send her money because there are men, men like Tim Russert, who have the temerity to ask her questions during a debate. If there are six male rivals on stage and two male moderators and heaven knows how many men manning lights and boom mikes, the one woman should have the right to have it two ways.
One would think okay, Dowd’s not seriously attempting to rally feminists and women’s support of Senator Clinton because a moderator of a debate asked the Senator a question is she? And even thought Ms. Dowd surreptitiously introduces the idea that Senator Clinton is the only female in the building (of course she wasn’t the only female in the building) by alluding that the debate was an all male production we really don’t know if there were women as well as men “manning” the lights and boom mikes now do we?

Then there is Ms. Dowd’s estrogen laundry list outlining why it’s perfectly acceptable for Senator Clinton to play the reverse sexism card.

1. A woman has the right to keep secrets as in Senator Clinton’s White house records (Records which the Senator claims shows that she has experience to lead this country).
2. A woman has the right to say anything she wants about immigration because men say anything that they want about it. (Dowd cites Lou Dodds here as a man who says what he wants about immigration).
3. A woman has the right to play the reverse sexism card because it works!

All errantly weak points justifiable only in a reverse sexist’s mind!

However as the saying goes, with friends like Maureen Dowd Senator Clinton doesn’t need any enemies, what Dowd does is reinforce the perception that the Senator is a cold calculating contradictor, equivocator or liar.

Dowd reinforces the idea that in the span of a single sentence Senator Clinton can and often does say one thing and then completely the opposite. Ms. Dowd cites the obviously staged attempt of Senator Clinton to have it both ways by making the public statement that she realizes that her opponents were merely challenging her as the front runner while secretly she directed her campaign to run a website edited version of the debate skewed to appear as men attacking a poor defenseless woman.
In New Hamphire on Friday, she stayed above the fray, saying that her male rivals are not “piling on” because she’s a woman but because she’s “winning.” Meanwhile, she let her aides below the fray stir up fem-outrage by putting a video on the campaign Web site called “The Politics of Pile On,” edited to highlight men ganging up on her to the tune of Mozart’s “Marriage of Figaro.”
This Ms. Dowd is everything that Senator Clinton’s opponents have ever said about Mrs. Clinton, she speaks from both sides of her mouth therefore she can’t be trusted!

According to Maureen Dowd nothing should be sacred when it comes to rousing the women’s vote. Yet this is another example that anything can be justified in the mind of a liberal.

To which I say, if that is the case then nothing should be sacred or off limits from preventing a lying, manipulation woman from become the Democrat Nominee for President of the United States. Nothing! Not piling on, not attacking a woman nothing!

And for any man who is attempting to stop this woman who is a reverse sexist and a manipulating female politician, I say, you go boy!

Now how’s that for what’s good for the gander is good for the goose politics? (Has it really come to this? Thanks to Senator Clinton, yes it has!)

Friday, November 02, 2007

The Politics of Reverse Sexism

“[I]n so many ways this all-women’s college prepared me to compete in the all-boys’ club of presidential politics.”—Senator Hillary Clinton preaching Sexism at her alma mater women only Wellesley College

Hillary Clinton stood on a stage for two hours Tuesday night, being yelled at by six men. —GAIL COLLINS

Hillary Rodham Clinton can’t have it both ways either she is the best candidate for the job or she is an affirmative action under-qualified woman who is attempting to exploit the fact that she is a poor little defenseless woman who needs the help of “The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants” or the “Divine Secrets of the Yaya Sisterhood to win the Presidency of the United States of America.

I’m going to say this as crystal clear as I can, no man would be attempting to use sexism to win the Presidency as Clinton is. Senator Clinton’s call for all women to unite to vote her into office is the severest case of reverse sexism!

So Senator Clinton doesn’t think that former Senator Edwards and Senator Obama stepped up their rhetoric against her in the 2008 Democrat Presidential Debates simply because she’s the front runner of her party?

A man would have thought that. A man would have said, Okay I should have expected to be attacked as the front runner. But oh no not a woman, not Hillary she wants to rally girl power ‘cause those mean old men have ganged up on her and hit a girl.

What do you think the Arabs or the Mexicans or any of the Chauvinistic male dominated world cultures are going to do when you’re attempting to negotiate with them Hillary? If you can’t take on Barak “Positive Politics” Obama and John “$500.00 haircut” Edwards without bitching like a little girl, then Mahmoud Ahmadinejab, Vladimir Putin, Hugo Chavez and the United Arab Emirates will certainly made you their little “BITCH.”

Hillary Clinton had to pull the Sexism card making this an all women “unite against the men” campaign. Of all of the things that divide this country Sen. Clinton has found yet another divider. Hillary Clinton is not a uniter she is a divider. This is fast becoming the lowest point of Senator Clinton’s campaign.

Clinton has been claiming that she is the one candidate that can bring the Country together how dare she pull the sexism card and talk about an old boys club and glass ceilings. That’s reverse sexism Senator. Senator Clinton isn’t running against an old boys network, Obama and Edwards, an old boy’s network doesn’t not make!

Clinton is running before you the American people! She’s applying for the job of President. But true to her nature she is trying to obfuscate and confuse. You’re suppose to be a mindless twit and say, Yeah it’s the 1920’s all over again and Hillary is leading the American women suffrage movement. Not!

Senator Clinton’s a little late for that, because there have been many great female leaders as heads of state. Golda Meir Prime Minister of Israel, 1898-1978, Indira Gandhi Prime Minister of India, 1917-1984, Margaret ThatcherPrime Minister of England, b. 1925, Benazir Bhutto, prime minister of Pakistan (1988-90, 1994-97); Kim Campbell, prime minister of Canada (1993); Edith Cresson, prime minister of France (1991-92); Maria Pintasilgo, prime minister of Portugal (1990-91); Kazimiera Prunskiene, prime minister of Lithuania (1990-91); Mary Robinson, president of Ireland (1990- ); Hanna Suchocka, prime minister of Poland (1992-93) and Argentina's new President-elect Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner.

Women all around the world have broken the glass ceiling and transcended the old boys network. If Hillary Clinton doesn’t win her party’s nomination for the presidency it won’t be because women are victims as she is attempting to portray. The world is not waiting for Hillary Clinton to become the first woman president, don’t be so vain Hillary, that has already been accomplished in Ireland and soon in Argentina.

On the contrary, if Hillary losses the Democrat nomination that will be a rejection of Hillary Clinton only, not women! Senator Clinton doesn’t represent the plight of women in America or the world.

Senator Clinton represents Senator Clinton only, otherwise she would not have invoked the sacred images of women’s suffrage so carelessly by blaming the fact that she bombed in the Presidential debates on sexism.

In 2007 you’ve really got to seek out instances of sexism. Senator Clinton didn’t experience sexism in front of thousands of people in the middle of the Democrat Presidential debates. Obama and Edwards were doing what anyone would do to attempt to win an all out political fight.

What Senator Clinton experienced was the front runner being taken down a notch by her opponents and after that she experienced her campaign’s total implosion because the Senator played the sexism card instead of taking her lumps like a man.