Tuesday, December 24, 2013

Obama’s Orwellian speak about Obamacare. Now here’s the reality

Despite Obamacare’s mix of requirements, mandates, subsidies, and penalties, the CBO projects that the law will never be able to decrease the number of uninsured below 11 percent of the population--Weeklystandard
In president Obama’s December 20, 2013 press conference, the final one of the year. Obama defended the signature achievement of his presidency with more deceptions and Obamaspeak. (see 7min26sec video )

Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report says that under the Affordable Care Act, a.k.a. Obamacare, 30 million non-elderly Americans will remain without health insurance in 2022.

One of the main arguments the Obama administration made for passing the Affordable Care Act was that it would provide coverage for [all Americans].—CNS news





Though Obama attempts to put lipstick on the piggish Obamacare law according to CNS news after the law is fully implemented there will be about the same number of Americans uncovered and without healthcare as there were before this liberty stealing law was forced on Americans.

Obamacare then is much ado about almost nil results! What changes is under Democrats and Obama you are less free as an American citizen.

Under the ACA, uninsured Americans have until the beginning of 2014 to purchase insurance through health-care exchanges being set up nationwide or other venues—or face a financial penalty. That penalty is equal to $95 per adult, and $47.50 per child, up to a maximum of $285—or 1 percent of household income, whichever is greater. Those penalties will escalate in future years.—CNBC



In addition to that below are listed are forty-three realities of Obamacare that the president and the media won’t be talking about. Yet these real effects of Obamacare will now affect every American negatively from now until perpetuity or as long as the United States lasts, whichever one is shorter.

1. ObamaCare was written by the health insurance and drug industry lobbyists.

2. Obamacare has a Review Panel to monitor benfits given to Seniors and what should and should not be allowed regarding health care treatments (In other words “Death Panels”)

3. ObamaCare puts in place new rules that prohibit plans with annual limits.

4. Obamacare puts 15 unelected bureaucrats in charge of meeting a budget target in Medicare with its newly created Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) .

5. Obamacare delivers a strong blow to Medicare Advantage (MA), which allows seniors to receive Medicare benefits from a private health plan of their choosing.

6. ObamaCare expands Medicaid (medical care for the poor) to everyone (under the Medicare age of 65) who has income less than 133% the federal poverty level.

7. ObamaCare will shorten the amount of time Doctors have with each patient, and lengthen the amount of time patients will have to wait.

8. ObamaCare means a two-tier Health Care System.

9. Obamacare attempts to address the challenge of covering people with pre-existing conditions with heavy-handed mandates, especially the requirement that all Americans enroll in government-approved insurance plans (the so-called “individual mandate”).

10. Obamacare is deeply unpopular because it is based on a bureaucratic, government-centered vision of American health care.

11. Obamacare will require us to pay insurers for “preventive care” as defined by government.

12. Obamacare will restrict the ability of insurance companies to consider health risks when setting insurance premiums.

13. Obamacare asserts on Congress’s behalf a power to restrain the liberty of an extremely broad group of Americans, and these Americans have not revealed any tendency to endanger their neighbors as the ex-inmates had in Comstock .

14. Obamacare is probably the first case to ever involve what is arguably a sleeper tax — that is, a tax that isn’t called a tax in the law itself, but may behave like one.

15. Obamacare and the EPA will together revoke and invalidate the US Constitution.

16. Obamacare failure now evident as health care costs rise nationwide.

17. Obamacare, and its vast catalog of new rules and regulations, does exactly what we don’t need. It makes it impossible for firms to make any reasonable estimate about the costs and the potential profits from investments.

18. Obamacare itself, which has consistently polled badly, fueled that movement.

19. ObamaCare which doesn’t take full effect until 2014.

20. ObamaCare is holding your health care hostage and offering no real choice.

21. Obamacare will cause controversy no matter what’s said about it.

22. ObamaCare is leaving a comet tail of broken promises as it steamrolls its way through our economy and into our lives.

23. Obamacare instead could be repealed and replaced with far superior reforms…which in fact are the author’s recommendations.

24. ObamaCare is just the latest in a very long series of Unconstitutional Federal over reaches never intended by our Founding Fathers.

25. Obamacare will speed the U.S. along the road to insolvency.

26. Obamacare also means that for up to 20 million Americans, they will lose the insurance they currently have, the insurance that they like and they want to keep.

27. Obamacare is a job killer.(Obamacare will not cover all Americans as promised. And according to some it will cost Americans jobs. (see here and here))



28. Obamacare sticks the states with a $50 billion additional copay on a vastly-expanded version of Medicaid—and threatens to withdraw every Medicaid dollar from a state if they refuse—while at the same time continuing to tax all the citizens of that state through their bi-weekly payroll taxes is an unconstitutional assault on the status of the states as sovereigns that are coequal with the federal government.

29. ObamaCare uses the Social Security language of the Internal Revenue Code to determine who is eligible for “religious conscience” objection to the insurance mandate.

30. ObamaCare is specifically written not to apply equally to everyone.

31. Obamacare is what happens when the commerce clause is allowed to be distorted.

32. Obamacare is yet another vehicle designed to TAKE our God given Freedom.

33. Obamacare has virtually no outlays in 2011, because the Medicaid expansion and subsidies don’t start up until 2014, which means the shifting time frame drops a year of no implementation and adds one of full implementation. Design this way to deceive the American people by Democrats.

34. Obamacare promotes the emergence of Mega-Hospitals that would employ all physicians.

35. Obamacare has not created a net healthcare benefit, but rather simply reshuffled the burden.

36. Obamacare is the Federal government acting in an improper role. A role that it wasn’t designed for like a lifeguard issuing parking tickets.

37. Obamacare does not allow you to move to another state to avoid being told that you must purchase something, you are locked in at the federal level no matter where you live.

38. ObamaCare requires every American to purchase health insurance, it requires every state to establish health insurance exchanges, and it dramatically expands Medicaid. Each of these – private health insurances programs, exchanges, and Medicaid – can, and in some case are required to, provide coverage for abortion.

39. ObamaCare provides grants for establishing ” School-based Health Centers ,” which could be run by abortion organizations like Planned Parenthood. While the law prevents these clinics from being used to “provide” abortions, it encourages groups like Planned Parenthood to make abortion referrals.

40. Obamacare doesn’t offer consumers real free market choice of where to get services, because all healthcare is now under the government’s umbrella. All outside choices have been eliminated.

41. ObamaCare institutes a government made “human right “ opposed to a Constitutional God given right as spoken about by this country’s Founding Fathers.

42. Obamacare is and has always been a dishonest plan from the very beginning.

43. Obamacare is constructed to deceive the American people with front loaded benefits while delaying onerous fines, taxes, fees and possible imprisonment after implemented.
HT ObamaCare The Truth.The lies

The CBO estimates that in 2022--8 years after the Affordable Care Act has been fully implemented--30 million people will remain uninsured. - CNS News (see report below)

Estimates for the Insurance Coverage Provisions of the Affordable Care Act updated for the Recent Supreme C...

Monday, December 23, 2013

The Orwellian Mind of Barack Hussein Obama

A remarkable look down the rabbit hole of the mind of Obama. His interpretation of his presidency and realities as Americans face them are startling other worldly. In this December 20, 2013 press conference Obama attempts to create an Orwellian world of positive accomplishment for this administration as he continues to fundamentally change America into an America of his own making notwithstanding the United States Constitution. (see 1hr51sec video)

Monday, October 28, 2013

Obama Talking head attempts to Filibuster Obamacare Interview

Dr. Zeke Emanuel attempts to blow pass Fox News Anchor Megyn Kelly with stock Democrat talking point tactics. The overall tactic which Dr. Emanuel employs is a Democrat invention called the "Pivot" as taught by Democrat operative Howard Deen. The pivot is used by all Democrats from Nancy Pelosi to President Barry Hussein Soetoro. President Soetoro however is one of the best at using it. It is a tactic which the Democrat remains non-responsive and never directly answers a question posed to them. Instead they turn the question around by attacking the one who asks the question, or by attacking a Republican or Republican policy or by attacking George Bush. (see Don't answer their questions)

Kelly didn't know what she was dealing with therefore she was virtually hapless in dealing with Dr. Emanuel's tactics.

In this remarkable illustrative interview on how Democrat operatives Filibuster against the truth with the "Pivot", Dr. Emanuel stooped as low as to attempt to blame former President Bush for the need of the disastrous Obamacare law that Democrats forced on the American people with the aid of bribed or blackmailed Supreme Court Justice John Roberts. (see 9:20min video)



Amazingly at the end Dr. Emanuel asked for another interview where he could uninterruptedly propagandize for Obamacare. Democrats believe that they can talk right pass reality.

I must admit that so far, with the aid of ABC, NBC, CBS, 60 minutes,MSNBC,CNN, Fox News,Jon Stewart,Stephen Colbert and print media NYT, LAT and various other Progressive Left-wing propaganda media outlets Democrats are given the ability to "talk right pass reality" without question.

Friday, July 26, 2013

Obama and Democrats never had their eye on the economic ball in the United States

President Barry Hussein Soetoro begins a two-month series of speeches across the country focusing on the economy and jobs. First, he speaks at Knox College in Galesburg, IL, and later at the University of Central Missouri in Warrensburg.

Every American should be insulted that the president would make the gross false claims he is still making after 5 years of failed “shovel ready” economic policies.

He cannot blame the Republicans, the GOP or George Bush this failure is a Democrat failure, this failure is a Barry Hussein Soetoro failure. (see 1:07:02 video)

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Scientist admit there’s no Global warming but still claim there will be

I need not remind you of all the years that lies were told in the name of Global Warming. You know all of the claims that the Global warming fanatics made about rising carbon levels as they related to trapping green house gases into the earth’s atmosphere, which would in turn cause disastrous worldwide climate catastrophes.

Now even the most ardent of Global Warming soothsayers are forced to capitulate to the fact there has not been global warming in over fifteen years. (see story)

So do these “scientist” apologize for scaring the bejesus out of the rest of us? Do they at least repent of their false religion? Do they correct the false assessments, which they have been teaching our children?

Senior climate scientists said that they had always expected periods when the rate of increase in temperatures would level off for a few years--Steve Connor, The Independent



NO, they pretend they knew all along that there was the possibility of a “hiatus” in the earth’s warming. They also pretend that they knew the ocean would provide a “relief valve” for the earth’s temperature increase.

Then they do something bold, they double down on their previous assessments of climate doom. Assessments made in error and on political motivated quasi-science backed by big moneyed interests. These big moneyed interests had at the ready, set-up markets and exchanges to do trillions of dollars in carbon trading and carbon regulation. All they needed was world governments, your American government, to hand your tax money over to them in the form of Climate Change regulation and taxes.

How do you suppose Al Gore became a multimillionaire? He is a front man for these moneyed interests. They used his name and influence as a former Vice president to promote the need for climate change legislation and policy, which would drive trillions of dollars of business via tax dollars into the markets and exchanges that were established for those purposes.

If the color pink is the new color black, carbon trading and carbon regulation was supposed to be the new world commodity supplanting pork bellies and oranges by its limitlessness.

Hell, Carbon is everywhere. We exhale carbon dioxide all living animals do and plants inhale it. Our bodies are 18.5% carbon based. Life is based on the chemical and physical properties of the element carbon. Pure carbon can be found in three different forms; diamond, graphite and carbon black. About 0.03 percent (by volume) of the Earth's atmosphere is carbon dioxide and more carbon is found as marble, limestone, chalk, coal, petroleum, and natural gas in the Earth's crust. Organic carbon compounds make up about 18 percent of all the matter in living things. Source

Taxing Carbon emissions is better than printing money out of thin air, a Federal Reserve stand by!

The problem that the MET office is facing is lost credibility. All the dire predictions of a global meltdown have failed and people are becoming aware of their gross miscalculations.

Nevertheless global warming scientist fanatics plan to continue the charade of the world facing global warming doom to provide cover for their pocket politicians; President Barry Hussein Soetoro, Chancellor Angela Merkel and Prime Minister David Cameron, etc.

This should give these carbon tax minions an opportunity to force their governments to enact climate change legislation in their countries so that big moneyed carbon traders will reap astronomical profits from the citizenry of each of their handmaiden’s perspective countries.

President Soetoro has already charged his EPA to implement rules and regulations that will cost the American people billions if not trillions of dollars. This act is meant to feed tax dollars into his big money handlers’ exchanges. He did this knowing that he could not get such policy passed through Congress nor should he be able to!

As I mentioned the credibility, which climate change fanatics enjoyed, has eroded over the 15 years of no global warming. The only way left to advance their agenda now is to have their bought and paid for politicians enact global warming policies and laws against the will of the earth’s people.

I predict the in the next few years the United States under President Barry Hussein Soetoro will adopt some of the most punitive and egregious carbon emission policies in the world. The base effect this will have on the United States is a transfer of wealth from the US into the foreign carbon exchanges, which are controlled by Al Gore’s handlers.

Thus proving the old saw incorrect, you can get something for nothing if you apply the tyranny of corrupt government and unscrupulous individuals to do so.

Monday, July 22, 2013

George and Trayvon the Story of a Murder going somewhere to Happen

There was a murder of a Black teen but because police were familiar with the killer and his family they took the murderer at his word from the very beginning. They give Zimmerman the deference that they would give one of their own as if he had received a speeding ticket. Zimmerman’s account became the narrative for the case and because he was familiar with the law, he knew exactly what to say.
Trayvon Martin was no angel as evident by the Conservative media that seems all too anxious to, in detail, smear the reputation of a dead Black Teenage boy in order to defend the jury verdict of innocent for George Zimmerman. Conservatives base their support of Zimmerman on the decision of a bogus court trial. Bogus because only George Zimmerman’s side of the story was heard, Trayvon’s side of the story will never be told notwithstanding the state prosecution’s pathetic presentation of the case, and because of the fatal 9mm hole in Trayvon’s chest put there by George Zimmerman.

Anyone familiar with criminal court cases in general understand that trials have less to do with truth and justice than they have to do with legal connections and social status. A system that in theory is supposed to guarantee equality under the law instead has historically handed down favoritism and deference for the wealthy, the beautiful and the powerful elite in this society.

It should be noted that George Zimmerman may have received favorable treatment from the police because of his family. ‎According to court records, his father is retired Supreme Court Magistrate Judge Robert Zimmerman and his mother Gladys Zimmerman was a court clerk. Connections in the legal community run deep and go far.

According to a records search on George, he was previously arrested for domestic violence, resisting an officer without violence and most shockingly, resisting an officer with violence — a felony charge that surely could have landed him in prison.

All three of those arrests, however, were mysteriously closed with no semblance of charges for the Florida resident. So how was someone with a violent past including that of battery against an officer able to carry a 9 mm handgun? Maybe that’s a question Robert Zimmerman should answer. (sources: Here and here )



George Zimmerman in this particular case was the “creepy ass cracker” that Trayvon assessed him to be that fatal night. However the “creepy ass cracker” had legal connects, which afforded him several brushes with the law that he was able to beat just like he beat the charges in the Trayvon Martin case.

What is ironic is to Trayvon Zimmerman was a creepy ass craker for following him. To Zimmerman Trayvon was an asshole trying to get away before he murdered him.

What the jurors of the case didn’t know and what was kept from their knowledge is that George Zimmerman is a violent man who previously beat two felony charges, which were dropped to one misdemeanor. What the jurors didn’t know is that Zimmerman was twice charged with resisting arrest and once charged with domestic violence. Zimmerman was able to beat those charges largely because of his father’s legal connections which produces good attorneys. Zimmerman was also charged with speeding, however the charge was dropped also. Finally, one of Zimmerman’s associates did a year in jail for him and didn’t finger him in the crime, this according to Zimmerman!

They do a year and dont ever open thier [sic] mouth to get my ass pinched.—George Zimmerman (source)



In 2005, Zimmerman was arrested and charged with "resisting officer with violence" and "battery of law enforcement officer." Both these felonies are considered third-degree. Due to his desperate attempts, the charges were reduced to "resisting officer without violence" and then the only remaining charge was also completely waived off when he entered an alcohol education program.

In the same year (2005), Zimmerman's ex-fiance, Veronica Zuazo, filed a civil motion for a restraining order, alleging domestic violence. In retaliation, Zimmerman filed for a retraining (sic) order against Zuazo and both these claims were resolved with both restraining orders granted.

The next year, in 2006, Zimmerman was charged with speeding. However, that case was dismissed because the officer who charged him failed to show up at the court.—Samantha, AllVoices and here.

In addition, Zimmerman was fired as a security guard for house parties because he body slammed a woman who infuriated him. A fellow employee said that it was an excessive use of force completely unjustified and as a consequence, the company let Zimmerman go.

“Usually he was just a cool guy. He liked to drink and hang with the women like the rest of us,” he said. “But it was like Jekyll and Hyde. When the dude snapped, he snapped.”

“He had a temper and he became a liability,” the man said. “One time this woman was acting a little out of control. She was drunk. George lost his cool and totally overreacted,” he said. “It was weird, because he was such a cool guy, but he got all nuts. He picked her up and threw her. It was pure rage. She twisted her ankle. Everyone was flipping out.”—Nydailynews.com



Zimmerman’s father, a White man, Robert Zimmerman is a retired Federal Magistrate. Zimmerman’s mother a Peruvian was a Court Clerk. These people were well known in the legal community. George himself was a kind of “Paul Blart” mall cop. His lifelong dream was to be a law enforcement officer, Zimmerman attended a four-month law-enforcement program in 2008 at the sheriff's office, but he was rejected. So George organized his own “community watch” for his neighborhood and appointed himself "Watch Captain" so that he could patrol armed with a concealed gun as if he were a sworn authorized agent of the law.

That's right, Zimmerman is not the innocent volunteer neighborhood watch person who peers from behind a curtain and then calls the police. No this was an armed man patrolling the street like a super hero. In Zimmerman’s mind he was, “Gunman.” Unfortunately, for Trayvon, Zimmerman’s power was to be able to kill an unarmed teen with a single 9mm bullet.

One law enforcement officer testified during the trial and under oath, that Zimmerman had a hero complex. So if you can imagine a rejected wannabe police officer on a self-appointed patrol looking for “bad guys” who, and I failed to mention this, looked down on Mexicans and other people that he considered criminally inclined.

If Zimmerman wasn’t a racist, he certainly has tendencies that suggested he believed that he was better than Mexicans and other minorities.
In Zimmerman’s own words, “I dont miss driving around scared to hit mexicans walkin on the side ofthe street, soft ass wanna be thugs messin with peoples cars when they aint around (what are you provin, that you can dent a car when no ones watchin) dont make you a man in my book. Workin 96 hours to get a decent pay check, gettin knifes pulled on you by every mexican you run into!” (source)

According to the NY Post and other sources in the last year, Zimmerman’s calls focused on black men and boys in his gated community. And oh yes Zimmerman knew Trayvon was black he identified Trayvon’s ethnicity early in his call to 911.

As the watch volunteer at the 260-unit Retreat at Twin Lakes, Zimmerman became a paranoid pest — peppering 911 with at least 46 calls. They varied in urgency, but in the last year focused mostly on black men or boys. (see source)



If Trayvon Martin was a bad actor, George Zimmerman was a bad actor with a 9mm gun, white skin and a very well legal connected family. The difference is Martin’s parent’s have no legal connection no political ties therefore Trayvon is just another Black teenager killed at the hand of a White man, Trayvon was unjustly reviled in a court of law, the white man’s system, Trayvon was reviled by the white man’s attorneys and Trayvon is now being defamed by White Conservatives in the media.

All the while, Zimmerman is now free to tweet, “Hey you’ all I got away with my third felony! This time it was murder.”

Does anyone think that this was some information that the jury would have liked to know? Does anyone think that truth and justice resulted in the Zimmerman trial?

As I stated at the beginning of this post anyone familiar with America’s courts understand that court cases have less to do with truth and justice than they have to do with legal connections and social status in America.

There was a murder of a Black teen but because police were familiar with the killer and his family they took him at his word from the very beginning. They give Zimmerman the deference that they would give one of their own as if he had received a speeding ticket. Zimmerman’s account became the narrative for the case and because he was familiar with the law, he knew exactly what to say.

This seems like a good time to remind people of the part of this story that keeps being overlooked: the part where the Sanford, Florida police did a terrible job. They didn’t place Zimmerman in custody, test him for drugs or alcohol, or evidently do a thorough investigation into his claims, he walking around free at the beginning, and nonetheless, with his gun. In addition, the police don’t do a very good job preserving the evidence on the ground because they assumed they had an open and shut case based on Zimmerman’s account of events.

Only an outcry from the community forced police to unwillingly arrest Zimmerman.

Trayvon Martin is dead and the only crime that was committed that night involving Trayvon was his murder in cold blood. If Martin was a thug or any of the other claims that Conservatives label him as, the fact is, he was chased and ultimately gunned down by Zimmerman, who has always been a thug in his own right. (hear 5:55min Zimmerman 911 call)



With his concealed weapon and his propensity for violence Zimmerman was a murder going somewhere to happen. Unfortunately, for the Martin family their Black teenage son is where it happened.

Transcript of Zimmerman’s 911 call the night he tried, convicted and murdered Trayvon Martin:

We’ve had some break-ins in my neighborhood and there’s a real suspicious guy. It’s Retreat View Circle. The best address I can give you is 111 Retreat View Circle.

This guy looks like he’s up to no good or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around looking about. [00:25]

911 dispatcher: OK, is he White, Black, or Hispanic?

Zimmerman:

He looks black.

911 dispatcher:

Did you see what he was wearing?

Zimmerman:

Yeah, a dark hoodie like a gray hoodie. He wore jeans or sweat pants and white tennis shoes. He’s here now … he’s just staring. [00:42]

911 dispatcher:

He’s just walking around the area, the houses? OK.

Zimmerman:

Now he’s staring at me. [00:48]

911 dispatcher:

OK, you said that’s 1111 Retreat View or 111?

Zimmerman:

That’s the clubhouse.

911 dispatcher:

He’s near the clubhouse now?

Zimmerman:

Yeah, now he’s coming toward me. He’s got his hands in his waist band.

And he’s a black male.[1:03]

911 dispatcher:

How old would you say he is?

Zimmerman:

He’s got something on his shirt. About like his late teens.

911 dispatcher:

Late teens?

Zimmerman:

Uh, huh. Something’s wrong with him. Yep, he’s coming to check me out. He’s got something in his hands. I don’t know what his deal is. [01:20]

911 dispatcher:

Let me know if he does anything, OK?

Zimmerman:

OK.

911 dispatcher:

We’ve got him on the wire. Just let me know if this guy does anything else.

Zimmerman:

OK.

These assholes. They always get away. When you come to the clubhouse, you come straight in and you go left. Actually, you would go past the clubhouse. [1:39]

911 dispatcher:

OK, so it’s on the left hand side of the clubhouse?

Zimmerman:

Yeah. You go in straight through the entrance and then you would go left. You go straight in, don’t turn and make a left.

He’s running. [2:08]

911 dispatcher:

He’s running? Which way is he running?

Zimmerman:

Down toward the other entrance of the neighborhood. [2:14]

911 dispatcher:

OK, which entrance is that he’s headed towards?

Zimmerman:

The back entrance.

[It sounds like Zimmerman says under his breath, ‘F-ing coons’ at 2:22]

911 dispatcher:

Are you following him? [2:24]

Zimmerman:

Yeah. [2:25]

911 dispatcher:

OK. We don’t need you to do that. [2:26]

Zimmerman:

OK. [2:28]

911 dispatcher:

Alright, sir, what is your name? [2:34]

Zimmerman:

George.

He ran.

911 dispatcher:

Alright, George, what’s your last name?

Zimmerman:

Zimmerman.

911 dispatcher:

What’s the phone number you’re calling from?

Zimmerman:

407-435-2400

911 dispatcher:

Alright, George, we do have them on the way. Do you want to meet with the officer when they get out there?

Zimmerman:

Yeah.

911 dispatcher:

Alright, where are you going to meet with them at?

Zimmerman:

Um, if they come in through the gate, tell them to go straight past the clubhouse and, uh, straight past the clubhouse and make a left and then go past the mailboxes you’ll see my truck. [3:10]

911 dispatcher:

Alright, what address are you parked in front of? [3:21]

Zimmerman:

Um, I don’t know. It’s a cut-through so I don’t know the address. [3:25]

911 dispatcher:

OK, do you live in the area?

Zimmerman:

Yeah, yeah, I live here.

911 dispatcher:

OK, what’s your apartment number?

Zimmerman:

It’s a home. It’s 1950 – oh, crap, I don’t want to give it out – I don’t know where this kid is [inaudible] [3:40]

911 dispatcher:

OK, do you just want to meet with them at the mailboxes then? [3:42]

Zimmerman:

Yeah, that’s fine. [3:43]

911 dispatcher:

Alright, George, I’ll let them know you’ll meet them at …

Zimmerman:

Could you have them call me and I’ll tell them where I’m at? [3:49]

911 dispatcher:

OK, that’s no problem.

Zimmerman:

My number … you’ve got it?

911 dispatcher:

Yeah, I’ve got it. 435-2400?

Zimmerman:

Yeah, you got it.

911 dispatcher:

OK, no problem. I’ll let them know to call you when they’re in the area. [4:02]

Zimmerman:

Thanks.

911 dispatcher:

You’re welcome.

Call ends 4:07

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

This is what Sequestration Looks Like

If there is sequestration going on it ain’t in these parts right Mr. president? And if this is sequestration, well it sounds soooooo good!
The president cancelled White house tours because of sequestration, the Blue Angels, The 2013 Air Expo planned for Joint Base Charleston, Skyfest 2013 and Beaufort Air Show canceled all reportedly due to sequestration. Closed are airport traffic control towers at the Ramona Airport and Brown Field, and at least three San Diego-based Navy vessels staying portside rather than going to sea all due to sequestration.

At kitchen tables across the county, tens of thousands of federal workers prepare unpaid furlough days, forcing an estimated 35,000 of them to scratch out a tighter family budget.

Border Patrol agents envision having to break off tracking legal border crossings as the clock runs out on their eight-hour shift and no overtime is allowed reportedly due to sequestration.

Last week, federal agencies were rushing to complete their plans for managing with less money between now and the Sept. 30 end of the federal fiscal year. About half the cuts are coming from the Pentagon with the rest spread across the federal government.

Among them were the Department of Defense, which said it will furlough most of its 800,000 workers nationwide for 14 days starting in June, including around 30,000 at local Marine and Navy bases all reportedly due to yes sequestration.

However at the Whitehouse it was peace, love and sooooooul! As the President, whose opulent lifestyle is not affected by sequestration, hosted a Memphis Soul Performance at the White house last night featuring but not limited to such performers as the Reverend Al Green, Mavis Staples, Ben Harper, Alabama Shakes and Justin Timberlake. (White House April 9th 2013 Memphis Sound Performance)

It was a hand clapping, head nodding, head bobbing, sing-along good time for all in attendance. Donna Brazille was there, David Axelrod and even a David Petrasus look alike all jiving and grooving to the Memphis sound of Justin Timberlake’s rendition of Otis Reddings’ Sittin by the Dock of the Bay. (see 4:56min video)



If there is sequestration going on it ain’t in these parts right Mr. president? And if this is sequestration, well it sounds soooooo good!

Monday, March 11, 2013

Message to the Huffington Post from Adam Carolla

California’s Lieutenant Gov. Gavin Newsom is an egregious lawbreaker. He singlehandedly broke California law and he ordered others to do so when he was Mayor of San Francisco. Newsom thought his lawlessness would make him Governor of California. Instead, the special interest group for which he broke the law could only get him the Lieutenant Governor post.

To the special interest homosexual lobby Gavin Newsom is sacrosanct. So imagine their outrage when a fellow leftist and comedian Adam Carolla calls Newsom out on his Liberal racism cloaked in low expectation of Blacks and Latinos. The Huffington Post bastion of the Left goes as far as to label Carolla a racist. The label racist is the most devastating charge that the Left can muster so it’s no surprise that Carolla reacted vulgarly.

In response, Carolla ripped the Huffington Post for trying to stir up a racial storm over an interview he had with California Lieutenant Governor involving black and Latino success. It would appear that the Left’s tactics, which they freely use against Conservatives, do not work as effectively when employed against one of their own.

*** Warning Explicit Language*** (see 10:12min Video)



Original interview, which began the controversy.

Carolla Newsom interview

(listen to 15:28min audio)

Wednesday, March 06, 2013

Before you Judge a Nurse for Refusing to do CPR…

If someone prevents a murder, perhaps a mass murder, and if that person heroically risks his or her life to save others that hero will be treated no differently than a foiled perpetrator of attempted murder. In fact, a hero will be punished in the similitude of a person who attempted to kill one's fellow classmates. That scenario is what is being played out all across America my friends. And it’s called Zero tolerance!
It is not that shocking that a Nurse would choose to follow the “rules” of her employer rather than choose do what others think is the right thing to do. After all, who made anyone else judge of what is right or wrong for that Nurse except that Nurse? That's how the Liberal Progressive, "everything is relative" argument goes right?

Sure, it is terrible that a patient died but the Nurse did do as she was instructed, “in case of emergency call 911.”

We hear similar instruction all of the time from the government. “If you see something, say something!” We’re supposed to, yes you thought it, call 911 and let the first responders handled everything.

Alternatively, take for instance the resent case of a 16-year-old Florida high school student who was suspended for three days after wrestling a gun away from a classmate on a school bus. (see story)

Yes Cypress Lake High School and the School District in which it resides ought to be very proud of their actions. You see they and hundreds of school districts throughout the country are teaching generations of Americans Zero tolerance.

What that means literally is if you prevent a murder, you will be summarily suspended from school for three days for violating the “Zero tolerance rules.”

You see a classmate at Cypress Lake High pulled a gun and pointed it at another student on a school bus pointblank with the threat to kill that student. However as it happened several students interceded and stopped what could have been another horrible gun violence story.

In spite of heroic actions of students the message this Cypress Lake High School’s school district and many others have sent throughout the country for decades is if you, a student, interfere in any way or if you happen to wrestle a gun from an assailant’s hand you will be punished. And if you prevent a murder, perhaps a mass murder, and if you heroically risk you life to save others you will be treated no differently than the foiled perpetrator of attempted murder. In fact, you will be punished in the similitude of the person who attempted to kill your fellow classmates. That scenario is what is being played out all across America my friends. And it’s called Zero tolerance! (see 2:54min video)



So before you go judging too harshly that nurse who followed the rules at work by refusing to administering CPR to a dying woman remember we’ve all been told to give up our guns, to call 911 in case of trouble, and wait for the authorities to solve all of our problems. (see 2:30min video)



You see it took first responders 7mins to get to the facility where the patient died. A lot can transpire in 7 minutes while someone is waiting on emergency responders to come to our aid. This is the reason that we shouldn’t give up our second amendment rights.

I don’t blame the nurse so much for the death of her patient I blame advocates of gun control who’s message is don’t attempt to protect yourself the police or someone else will protect you.

I blame Zero Tolerance, which generations of American have been taught that if someone attacks you don’t do anything because if you hit back you’re just a guilty was the bully or assailant who has been terrorizing you since you where in Kindergarten and you will be suspended for fight just as much as the one who terrorized you for all those years.

I blame political correctness that has made education and educators the laughingstocks of this nation. If it were not so sad, it would be funny. If you point your finger like a gun, or draw a gun on a white piece of paper or if you bite your pop tart in the shape of a mountain but the teacher believes he or she sees the shape of a gun you are then whisked away to the principal’s office for suspension or expulsion.

The message that all the just aforementioned sends is don’t do anything, which is not first approved by authorities.

The nurse’s authorities told her not to perform CPR. Just as we are all being told by authorities (in violation of our Constitutional rights), the right to keep and bear arms is the wrong thing to do. Therefore, we must comply with the government’s wishes, which are in violation of the constitution and ban guns when the constitutional explicitly states that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Before you judge that nurse too harshly remember that her actions were dictated by her employer just as our actions are being dictated by anti 2nd amendment advocates who would rather make unconstitutional laws and see the constitution violated than to see you and I exercise the freedom to choose to do what we believe is correct.

How did our nation become like this? It all starts when a 16year-old hero is suspended for three days for doing the right thing. In addition, you wonder how a nurse can stand by and allow someone to die because her employer told her not to administer CPR.

Zero tolerance that’s one way to achieve that result. Moreover, another is taking away Constitutional rights. If people are compliant enough to allow the government to take away God given rights then they most certainly will allow someone to die on governments or company’s orders, command or decree.

It’s been done before in Nazi Germany it is now becoming true in America. Shockingly it appears that the spirit of the Führer has returned and is here alive in Progressive America. Heil Zero Tolerance, Heil Gun Control and Heil Progressivism!

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Obama No Longer the Smartest Man in the Room

Now, lately, some people have been saying, well, maybe we'll just give the President some flexibility. He could make the cuts the way he wants and that way it won't be as damaging. The problem is when you're cutting $85 billion in seven months, which represents over a 10-percent cut in the defense budget in seven months, there's no smart way to do that. There's no smart way to do that.

You don't want to have to choose between, let's see, do I close funding for the disabled kid, or the poor kid? Do I close this Navy shipyard or some other one? When you're doing things in a way that's not smart, you can't gloss over the pain and the impact it's going to have on the economy."
—Barry Hussein Soetoro, president of the Democrat Party of the United States.
After hearing the idea floated that Republicans plan to give him power to decide which cuts to make in the upcoming sequester all of a sudden the President realizes that he's not smart enough to make the cuts. Listen to him say so! (see 1:07min video)



What’s interesting is the president has been governing like he is only the president of the Democrat Party implementing laws and policies that only benefit Democrats but in the long run hurting America. For instance the president impaneled a blue ribbon committee last year to do the hard work of recommending cuts needed to keep the economy from failing. Obama’s panel apparently wasn’t smart enough to make the cuts need to keep America solvent. They made no suggestions, in essence they failed. And now the president admits that he’s not smart enough to make the necessary cuts to save America’s economy either.

The Obama sequester was conceived by the President and Democrats and according to the president the cuts that he put forward will devastate our economy. And surprisingly there is not a smart Democrat anywhere in government that knows how to fix what the Democrats have broken. Democrats always talk about being smart. Where are the smart Democrats?

You voted for this America. Not very smart!

Monday, February 25, 2013

Stop Democrats From Disarming Americans of Our 2nd Amendment Rights

Dan Bongino former CIA agent knows more about the 2nd amendment than the president and the Liberal Progressive Democrat Party. Dan recognizes that "the right to bear arms shall not be infringed" is a God given right and not a right that a man, any man or woman can take from an American.

In the following Guns Across American Rally in Annapolis, MD. Mr. Bongino speaks truth to power. Following is Mr. Bongino's call to action. (see 6:15min video)

Thursday, February 21, 2013

Believe Nothing About Obama It’s all Propaganda

What do you actually know about president Barry Hussein Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama? You know NOTHING that he doesn’t want you to know and EVERYTHING that he cares for you to believe.

You have been manipulated, duped, porked, bamboozled and deceived by Democrats and this President.

Propaganda and manipulation are fundamental components of the Soetoro administration’s plan to deceive what Rush Limbaugh refers to as the “low information voters.” Apparently, it has gotten so extreme that the Politico wrote a four-page article entitled, “Obama, the puppet master.” (see article)

The Politico is not what one would call a conservative news blog, it isn’t. Therefore, it is surprising that they would write anything that is not in strict compliance with protecting the first mixed race Kenyan-African and White president of the United States from honest scrutiny.

Take a look at how Politico’s Jim VanDehel and Mike Allen discuss the way the president’s handlers have wrapped him in Saran wrap while creating a staged presidency where information is manipulated to provide optimal positive coverage and approval of everything that this president says and does. (see 2:13 min video)



The Soetoro presidency is purely stagecraft! It’s political slight-of-hand backed by a media that is not going to let anything harm the guy that they put into office. (or so they think they put him in office!)

According to VanDehel and Allen, the Soetoro administration uses various “techniques” to always frame media coverage the way they want it.

These techniques include but are not restricted to limiting access to the president so that media can never get an unvarnished report on any aspect of the Soetoro agenda and policies.

Other techniques are; government creation of media content (photos of the president, videos of White House officials, blog posts written by Obama aides), which can then be instantly released to the masses through social media. They often include footage unavailable to the press.

The White House has built its own content distribution net.

Soetoro’s aides use technology and exploit the president’s “brand.” They are disciplined about cracking down on staff leaks, or reporters who write things they don’t like. And they are obsessed with taking advantage of Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and every other social media forums, not just for campaigns, but governing. The president’s aides often intimidates and attempts to control media stories.

This president and Democrats receive Softball interviews, this administration practices weekend document and information dumps to avoid negative coverage, and they practice iron-fisted control of access to White House information and officials.

This president practices absolute scrutiny avoidance. The president has not granted an interview to print reporters at The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, POLITICO and others in years

Finally, they also bully reporters: making clear there will be no interviews, or even questions at press conferences, if Soetoro aides are displeased with their coverage.

Before you say, Bush did it too. He did not. Much of the propaganda techniques use by the Soetoro administration are either original to it or done in such extreme fashion that they are unrecognizable as ever been used before.

Americans have been and are being deceived by this president and his political Party; it is all propaganda you know nothing about Barry Hussein Soetoro other than what he’s allowed you to know. To that end, believe me when I say that as Americans we know nothing about Barry Hussein Soetoro that isn’t carefully crafted and spoon fed to us by the Soetoro administration.

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Illegal Entry Is Not Immigration

This controversial letter was forwarded to me by a friend. The problem is our politicians are about to do something terribly wrong. They insult our intelligence by calling giving amnesty to nationals of other countries Comprehensive Immigration Reform. These Illegal Aliens have violated our laws by entering our country illegally they are not "immigrants" as our elected representatives chose to mislabel them.

What they wish to do is give citizenship to those law breakers in exchange for those illegal votes. This letter written by Rosemary LaBonte speaks very well to why giving amnesty to illegal aliens is a bad idea.

Dear Editor: So many letter writers have based their arguments on how this land is made up of immigrants. Ernie Lujan for one, suggests we should tear down the Statue of Liberty because the people now in question aren't being treated the same as those who passed through Ellis Island and other ports of entry.

Maybe we should turn to our history books and point out to people like Mr. Lujan why today's American is not willing to accept this new kind of immigrant any longer.. Back in 1900 when there was a rush from all areas of Europe to come to the United States, people had to get off a ship and stand in a long line in New York and be documented. Some would even get down on their hands and knees and kiss the ground. They made a pledge to uphold the laws and support their new country in good and bad times. They made learning English a primary rule in their new American households and some even changed their names to blend in with their new home.

They had waved good bye to their birth place to give their children a new life and did everything in their power to help their children assimilate into one culture. Nothing was handed to them. No free lunches, no welfare, no labor laws to protect them. All they had were the skills and craftsmanship they had brought with them to trade for a future of prosperity.

Most of their children came of age when World War II broke out. My father fought along side men whose parents had come straight over from Germany , Italy , France and Japan . None of these 1st generation Americans ever gave any thought about what country their parents had come from. They were Americans fighting Hitler, Mussolini and the Emperor of Japan . They were defending the United States of America as one people.

When we liberated France , no one in those villages were looking for the French-American or the German American or the Irish American. The people of France saw only Americans. And we carried one flag that represented one country. Not one of those immigrant sons would have thought about picking up another country's flag and waving it to represent who they were. It would have been a disgrace to their parents who had sacrificed so much to be here. These immigrants truly knew what it meant to be an American. They stirred the melting pot into one red, white and blue bowl.

And here we are with a new kind of immigrant who wants the same rights and privileges. Only they want to achieve it by playing with a different set of rules, one that includes the entitlement card and a guarantee of being faithful to their mother country. I'm sorry, that's not what being an American is all about. I believe that the immigrants who landed on Ellis Island in the early 1900's deserve better than that for all the toil, hard work and sacrifice in raising future generations to create a land that has become a beacon for those legally searching for a better life. I think they would be appalled that they are being used as an example by those waving foreign country flags.

And for that suggestion about taking down the Statue of Liberty , it happens to mean a lot to the citizens who are voting on the immigration bill. I wouldn't start talking about dismantling theUnited States just yet.

(signed) Rosemary LaBonte

KEEP THIS LETTER MOVING. FOR THE WRONG THINGS TO PREVAIL THE RIGHTFUL MAJORITY NEEDS TO REMAIN COMPLACENT AND QUIET!! LET THIS NEVER HAPPEN!!

Monday, February 11, 2013

Dr. Benjamin Carson Christian, Scientist and Everything the President is Not

This nation has fallen under the political hypnotic spell of nonsensical Progressive Liberal speech therefore it doesn’t seem likely that Dr. Carson’s wisdom with account for much. The Progressive Liberal press, network or cable, will not be showing this speech you will only see it if you seek it out.
Dr. Benjamin Carson the renowned neurosurgeon is no doubt a brilliant man. He is Johns Hopkins Hospital’s Pediatric Neurosurgery Division Director.

Dr. Carson’s brilliance was on national display recently when he spoke at the National Prayer breakfast February 7, 2013 in front of the President and the First lady.

Dr. Carson spoke about about political correctness, the 1st amendment and Healthcare.

This nation has fallen under the political hypnotic spell of nonsensical Progressive Liberal speech therefore; it doesn’t seem likely that Dr. Carson’s wisdom with account for much. The Progressive Liberal press, network or cable, will not be showing this speech you will only see it if you seek it out.

You be the judge of whether the current resident of the White house has ever said anything as wise as what Dr. Carson has said here in just less than thirty minutes. (see 27:32min video)

Thursday, January 31, 2013

A Voice for the 2nd Amendment

“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."--Benjamin Franklin
Henson Ong an American Citizen and a Legal immigrant expresses what many so-called American citizens have apparently forgotten. (see 5:10min video)

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Talk of Jobs conspicuous by its Absence

Where is all of that high-falutin talk of Jobs, where is the president’s jobs council, and where is the president poetic rhetoric about solar, wind and air?

Absent from the market square of ideas that’s where they are. Replacing them are the absurdities that will only further weaken an already fragile U.S. economy.
What are the topics that presently consume the media and the government today? Think about it, I’ll give you a moment. Time’s up! Okay if you said advancing Homosexuality, if you said an unconstitutional assault against the 2nd amendment, if you said granting 40 million illegal foreign nationals amnesty and U.S. citizenship, if you said implementing more usurious taxes on the rich (and everyone else) and if you said implementing new bogus and costly federal regulations under the guise of Climate Change you would be absolutely correct.

What is not being discussed by media or government is the fact that the current administration has done nothing on the topic of jobs. If you recalled the president promised to make jobs his number one priority. He stated emphatically that neither he nor his administration would rest until they solved the jobs problem in America. He made such promises in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012 but in 2013 not so much.

This president and this media have pivoted to an all out full frontal assault on the American people and their constitution. With a radical hard left manifesto to fundamentally change the United States into the economic mess that Greece and Spain are. This president has only focused on social issues and only those that divide us. Yet no one has had the temerity to ask the question, “ Mr. President what about the good green shovel ready jobs that you promised America?”

I don’t relish being the bearer of bad tidings America but the fact of the matter is there are no “good” jobs and there will be no “good” jobs in the near future according to a new report published by Richard Vedder, Christopher Denhart, and Jonathan Robe entitled “Why are Recent College Graduates Underemployed?” (see below)

Why are Recent College Graduates Underemployed? by



This Report highlights the following:

• About 48 percent of employed U.S. college graduates are in jobs that the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) suggests requires less than a four-year college education. Eleven percent of employed college graduates are in occupations requiring more than a high-school diploma but less than a bachelor’s, and 37 percent are in occupations requiring no more than a high-school diploma;

• The proportion of overeducated workers in occupations appears to have grown substantially; in 1970, fewer than one percent of taxi drivers and two percent of firefighters had college degrees, while now more than 15 percent do in both jobs;

• About five million college graduates are in jobs the BLS says require less than a high-school education;

• Comparing average college and high-school earnings is highly misleading as a guide for vocational success, given high college-dropout rates and the fact that overproduction of college graduates lowers recent graduate earnings relative to those graduating earlier;

• Not all colleges are equal: Typical graduates of elite private schools make more than graduates of flagship state universities, but those graduates do much better than those attending relatively non-selective institutions;

• Not all majors are equal: Engineering and economics graduates, for example, typically earn almost double what social work and education graduates receive by mid-career;

• Past and projected future growth in college enrollments and the number of graduates exceeds the actual or projected growth in high-skilled jobs, explaining the development of the underemployment problem and its probable worsening in future years;

• Rising college costs and perceived declines in economic benefits may well lead to declining enrollments and market share for traditional schools and the development of new methods of certifying occupation competence.

No one is talking about jobs America. Granting amnesty to 40 million citizens of Mexico and Latin America will only exacerbate the strain on an already hopeless job market. All the other talk of guns, homosexuality and climate change is just white noise to prevent you from thinking about our failed leadership and the real crisis this country faces.

Where is all of that high-falutin talk of Jobs, where is the president’s jobs council, and where is the president poetic rhetoric about solar, wind and air?

Absent from the market square of ideas that’s where they are. Replacing them are the absurdities that will only further weaken an already fragile U.S. economy.

Source of report and statistics:

Thursday, January 24, 2013

What difference does it make at this point?

With all due respect, the fact is, we had four dead Americans–was it because of a protest or because of guys out for a walk one night and decided to go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator.

Now honestly, I will do my best to answer your questions about this but the fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information. The I.C. has a process, I understand, going with the other committees to explain how these talking points came out. But, you know, to be clear, it is, from my perspective, less important today, looking backwards
—Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State
What difference at this point does it make? At what point Ms. Clinton? Oh, you mean the point, which you and the Obama administration stalled out the investigation into the deaths of Ambassador Chris Stevens, Glen Doherty, Sean Smith and Tyrone Woods. That point?

First, stalling until after the reelection of Barry Hussein Soetoro? Or do you mean after the point of your alleged “fall and concussion” dragging out your testimony over weeks. Was it your intentions to run the clock out on Benghazi making any question regarding the tragic events stale dated, irrelevant and moot?

The fact is the administration had real time Intel and seven hours to react to the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya however someone in the White house decided against attempting to save the lives of Americans that is the point.

The difference is Ms. Clinton the American people care about who left four Americans to die in Benghazi and apparently, no one in the Democrat Party, The White house or the State Department under your authority does. (see 2:09min video)



The fact is the Soetoro administration lied to the American people repeatedly telling Americans that the attack on the American Consulate was caused because of an Internet video. The administration knew all along and at the beginning, that it was a terrorist attack.

We all know what happened Ms. Clinton. Americans were left to die in Benghazi by the Soetoro administration. What difference does this make at this point? Apparently, none Ms Clinton, four American died while the White house stood idly by and did nothing.

It doesn’t matter why the Consulate was attacked what matters is why the Soetoro administration decided not to respond to the attack. Ms. Clinton’s appearance before the House committee did not produce the answer that question.

Ms. Clinton’s appearance was a smoke screen meant to give the look of answering the question without actually answering the questions of Benghazi.

Why didn’t the Soetoro administration go to the aid of Americans? Ms. Clinton’s answer… At this point what difference does it make?

The president was reelected, Hillary Clinton assumed blame but will receive any consequences and mid-managers were fired as scapegoats instead of the president and Ms. Clinton facing the blame for their incompetency.

To answer your question Ms. Clinton, apparently it makes no damn difference at all, no difference at all.

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Obama's Second Inaugural Address: Unity through Duplicity

In Orwellian worldview, Peace is War. It is the same in this president’s doublethink language. Unity is war against the GOP
Words mean something. The only problem is getting people to agree to their meaning. According to the American Bar Association, there were 1,116, 967 licensed attorneys in June of 2006. The number rose to 1,128,729 by the end of 2006, and grew to 1,143,358 by the end of 2007. Number of lawyers for each state in those years can be found on "Lawyers By State" on the ABA Website.

Attorneys spend a significant amount of time massaging words and meaning into duplicitous bifurcated forks in the road that lead either to confusion or to improbability. Rarely does an attorney use words to lead to truth. Ultimately, words are tools used to persuade to an attorney’s point of view not for pursue of truth.

That is why I prefer most anyone other than an attorney for President.

This opinion may seem a bit overbroad, and forgive me if you are the exception to the paradigm. You may be someone who uses your skills of persuasion to champion truth. However even you must admit that you were taught to argue both sides of an argument whether right or wrong.

In fact right or wrong does not exist for must attorneys. For many attorneys all things are relative or as each one perceive his or her understanding of what is real.

In our litigious society, all is relative. Nothing is, as it seems. A simple constitutional matter such as governmental mandated healthcare, unconstitutional on its face can be declared both unconstitutional and constitutional according to Chief Justice John Roberts and made the law of the land in a surreal judgment that all but guaranteed the reelection of Barry Hussein Soetoro.

Which brings me to my point, the president in this inauguration speech spoke of unity. In fact he quoted the Declaration of Independence, “"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."”

He continued, “Today we continue a never-ending journey, to bridge the meaning of those words with the realities of our time. For history tells us that while these truths may be self-evident, they have never been self-executing;”

Thereafter the president laid forth an agenda not for all Americans but the same agenda that he and his fellow progressives attempted to push forward in this first four years as president. And though in his second inaugural address he cloaked his Partisanship with the “royal we” throughout the speech he was really speaking to his Progressive base as reported by Tom Curry of MSNBC (see article).

Peter Baker of the NYTimes reports that the President was laying out a Liberal vision for America. (see article)

Michael Kinsley of Bloomberg describes the President’s speech as giving a Liberal’s definition of Rights (see article)

And David Corn of Mother Jones saw the president’s speech as a direct appeal to his sycophants to help him move his agenda this second term (see article)

To the uninformed or to the already Liberal minded person what they heard was a call for unity. However, to others the president’s speech was an in-yo-face promise to jam the rest of the Progressive agenda down the throats of dissenting Americans who do not share the same values or vision was Barry Hussein Soetoro and the Progressive Left.

Even at his moment of swearing on Lincoln’s bible President Soetoro became the anti-Lincoln. In president Lincoln's, second inaugural Lincoln sought to bind the wounds of our nation at the end of a divisive Civil War. President Lincoln said, “One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war.” He further remarked, “Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away.”

“Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether."

“With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.”


In contrast, President Soetoro inaugural address was a call to his Progressive constituents for a continuation if not an escalation of the Progressive ideological war against Conservatism and the GOP. This would be the equivalent of Lincoln calling on the North to completely destroy the South.(see full address)

This is the attitude that the president will promote over the next four years as he advances the ideologies of the Left, Global Warming, redistribution, homosexuality, illegal aliens voting in U.S. elections, voter fraud and voiding first and second amendment rights.

All of this he will attempt to do duplicitously as he speaks of unity just as he did in his first four years. He may well succeed this time because the majority of Americans do not understand that what the president says means something totally different to him than it does to them.

In Orwellian worldview, Peace is War. It is the same in this president’s doublethink language. Unity is war against the GOP (see previous post)

Friday, January 18, 2013

Democrats use Jedi Mind Tricks on the American People Regarding Guns

He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security—Benjamin Franklin
The American people are perhaps the most manipulated people in the world. Corporations spend billions upon billions of dollars a year telling Americans what to think, what to eat, what to wear, etc.

Corporations use words, ideas and images as if they were rapid-fire bullets shot from assault rifles. Corporations target and hunt children, adolescents and adults as if we are deer in open season.

I don’t have to tell you that! You see the commercials every day. You go to the movies that are social conditioning centers, which transmit the latest social values to the unsuspecting moviegoer.

Therefore, it isn’t surprising that our politicians have picked up on the secret of how to get the American people to buy into any political propaganda they might use as if it is the gospel truth.

Case in point, do you really think that the recent discussion about eviscerating the 2nd amendment of the Constitution of the Untied States of America is about saving children?

Did you see the children that the president shielded himself with in a well thought-out visual message meant to convey the idea that he wasn’t really single-handedly pre-empting the Constitution by executive order. No what he was really doing is making it safer for our children.

The many acts that our president employs are stagecraft. They are methods they are tricks to persuade you to buy into your own enslavement. If you will willingly lay down your resistance to governmental tyranny or if you will compliantly accept unconstitutional acts from your elected representatives then where will be no need to restrain you physically. Yet!

To best describe what the president and Democrats are doing I refer to George Lucus’ Star Wars. The Characters of the Jedi Knights use a thought control devise which was based on suggestion.

The Knight would suggest an idea to a likely candidate and the unsuspecting low brow would mindlessly comply with the Jedi’s thought suggestion. Much like we see coming from the White house and media today.

The White house makes a statement the media unquestioningly repeats it and the sycophants and supporters of the Democrat Party mindlessly pick up such transmissions or statements as truth.

It’s like, “These aren’t the droids you are looking for.” When the droids or fact are indeed the ones we are looking for and they are stand right there in our faces. Nevertheless, because of the suggestion to the contrary we fail to see the droids.

And it's not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.—Barry Hussein Soetoro



Now to make this crystal clear. When the president was first running for office in 2008 he, describe a segment of American working-class voters in Pennsylvania and the Midwest as “bitter clingers” people who had lost all hope in government and had only their religion and guns to cling. This is the reason that the president wants to separate Americans from their guns. He wants Americans dependent on Government and less free. (listen 1:39min clip)



So how best does a tyrannical government pry guns and religion from the hands of these “bitter clingers”? Democrats believe the answer is that they enact laws designed to do what is normally not done. For instance in the Patient’s Affordable Health Care law Democrats added conditions that violate some Americans’ religious principles. Thereby forcing Americans to choose between their faiths or to accept the law.

In addition, Democrats are creating conflict within the society by weakening parts of the Constitution, which they disagree by selective enforcement or non-enforcement. Also,they use instances of gun violence as these instances occur in our society to promote a false notion that the 2nd amendment needs to be repealed or in the very least fixed. (see 23 executive orders regarding guns)

23 Executive Orders Regarding Violating the 2nd Amendment by



This proposed disarmament and /or regulation of the American people is exactly the wrong thing to do. The founding fathers realized the corrupting affect of government would eventually manifest in America. Government corruption is happening or has happened in every other government known to man. They also knew that the only way to protect American people from a government that would attempt to enslave them is to have the right to keep and bear arms and they believe that right should not be infringed upon or “regulated”.

Yet Democrats tell Americans they are proposing gun control measures not to violate the Constitution but rather to protect the American people from gun violence.

That brings me back to founding father Benjamin Franklin who said, “He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security.”

Democrats would have Americans willingly give up the Constitutional right to protect themselves be it from gangs, robbers or a tyrannical government.

This is the Jedi mind trick; “You really don’t need to protect yourselves from a government that is operating outside of the Constitution” is the suggestion to the weak-minded sycophants of the Democrat Party.

The Government then signs executive orders to strip the American people of their God given and Constitutional enumerated right to keep and bear arms. The sycophants applaud on cue and repeat the Gov. Andrew Cuomo rant, “No one needs 10 bullets to kill a deer!” That statement Governor is a non sequitur.

The Constitutional right to keep and bear arms un-infringed has absolutely nothing to do with hunting. However, it has everything to do with freedom. That is what this national discussion is about, freedom. It is not about false measures or laws that will not prevent gun violence or save one child. Moreover, this discussion is not about hunting.

Controlling America’s guns is about an agenda to change the Constitution by popular consensus rather than by the legislative process. The legislative process is the only legal way outlined within the Constitution for change not executive order and not popular consensus.

The current discussion of “Gun Control” is designed to trick your mind into thinking that the government is saving children when in fact the opposite is occurring. Actually, government is striping the children of their right to live free under a Constitution.

These are the facts you are looking for. Please disregard the Government Jedi mind trick on guns!

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Why Conservatives and Republicans are hated By Liberals and Democrats

Simply stated Liberals hate Conservatives for what Conservatives represent. The stable home life, do your homework, pick up after yourself mentality. Whereas Liberals self identify with “others” who make the Parent group look kind of square, kind of old and out dated.
You’ve seen dramatizations of rebellious teens conflicting with parents who have worked hard to provide a home, food and a constructive environment for their offspring. Some of you are probably experiencing such a family crisis now.

The teen most often is conflicted between values that his or her parents attempt to teach and values, which the teen has picked up from outside influences such as friends, the media, teachers, etc.

Wanting to be accepted by those who are outside of the familiar sphere the teen often lashes out at the people who care about them the most, their parents. This causes what might be described as the “generation gap.” The so-called “gap” is the wall erected by a teen who is now attempting to cut off family influences so that he or she many appear to be like friends, media, teachers and the rest of those who represent pop culture or popular influences.

If one were to apply this logic to Conservatives and Liberals, the parallels might surprise you if you haven’t thought about it before. In the “Beaver Cleaver” 1950’s and back, everyone in the United States was “Conservative.” Over all America was religiously conservative. I refer to this as the Parent group.

In the late 50’s into the 1960’s there started a cultural revolution. The young begin to reject the parent group and split off from Conservative values. While Conservatism remained stationary this splitter group moved left. I call this new movement “Liberals.” The Adolescent group.

What we see in today’s politics is the logical conclusion of adolescents rejecting parents. If you’ve ever heard an adolescent scream, I hate you, I hate you, I hate you, to a parent and if you understand what is behind that immature sentiment, then you know what the dynamic between today’s Liberals and Conservatives is.

Simply stated Liberals hate Conservatives for what Conservatives represent. The stable home life, do your homework, pick up after yourself mentality. Whereas Liberals self identify with “others” who make the Parent group look kind of square, kind of old and out dated.

Liberals or the adolescent group self identify with anyone other than the parent group. For example in a resent sale of his Channel One broadcast cable network Progressive Liberal and inventor of Global warming Al Gore had a choice to sell his network to either Conservative up and coming cable TV entrepreneur Glenn Beck or Sharia Law promoter and Islamic Owned cable TV network al Jazeera. (see story)

Gore chose al Jazeera. He claimed al Jazeera was more philosophically aligned with him than America loving, American born and raised Conservative Glenn Beck. Al Jazeera is owned by the Saudis who represent Big Oil and world domination through Islam. Gore is more aligned with big oil and Islam than a Conservative American patriot? (see story)

Might I note that Glenn Beck supports American values and the preservation of America. Again Beck is “Conservative.” Whereas al Jazeera is promoting the total worldwide Arab domination of the religion of Islam and Sharia Law.

Al Gore’s Liberal Progressivism or his allegiance to the adolescent group would have him align himself with the enemies of freedom rather than help the purveyors of freedom and American values protect America. This is simply astonishing!

This hate of Conservatives is manifested in the president and the Left. They are radicalized to the point that they would see America destroyed rather than see Conservatives maintain American values for all posterity.

The vehement vitriol seen spewing forth from the Left is the same anger that adolescents display when they are enraged because their parents insist that family values are more important than being like those influences outside of the parent group.

That said I attribute the partisanship demonstrated in our politics today as a direct result of the Left rejecting Conservativism and moving to extreme Leftwing positions. So extreme in fact that Al Gore would sell an American network to enemies of America who are avowed to destroy America and establish suppressive Islamic Sharia Law worldwide.

Monday, January 14, 2013

Continued: Obama and Democrats want to impose UN Gun Control on America

Last post I explained Democrats current effort to, “never let a good crisis go to waste” this effort is currently known as the “Gun Crisis.” I believe the Democrats’ effort is part and parcel of a broader United Nations initiative to regulate small arms globally. (see previous post)

The President supports the UN effort. He did not want you to know but now that the tragic Sandy Hook elementary massacre has created the opportunity of “crisis” Democrats are using the emotional value of Sandy Hook to attack the 2nd amendment.

Fundamentally changing the constitution is what the President promised he would do if given the chance. And this “crisis” lends itself to the anti-Constitutionalists that abhor both the 1st and the 2nd amendments.

As promised last post following are the Documents which show the United Nations’ efforts to supersede laws of sovereign nations by implementing global gun regulation. Also you will find letters from both Democrats and Republicans addressing the President’s support of the UN’s efforts and warning him against violating the U.S. Constitution.

UN CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM & STRENGTHENING OF LEGAL INSTITUTIONS MEASURES TO REGULATE FIREARMS

UN Justice Reform & Strengthening of Legal Institutions Measures to Regulate Firearms by



DEMOCRAT LETTER RE: 2ND AMENDMENT

Democrat Letter to President Obama rejecting WH plans to support UN measures requiring Gun Control by



REPUBLICAN LETTER RE: 2ND AMENDMENT

Republican Letter to the President re: 2nd Amendment Rights by



UN REPORT OF THE SECRETARY GENERAL ON SMALL ARMS

UN Report of the Secretary General on Small Arms by



UNODA FACTSHEET ON GLOBAL GUN REGULATION

UNODA Factsheet on Global Gun Regulation by

Friday, January 11, 2013

UN is behind Gun Control like they're behind Climate Change

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety—Benjamin Franklin
You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before —Rahm Emanuel
They’re back! Like huge global poltergeists the UN is the spirit behind the newest U.S. crisis “Gun Control.”

If one remembers, the UN was and is the force behind the other world-wide crisis “Global warming.” Global warming or its more acceptable upgrade “Climate Change” is a plot and ploy to control and regulate carbon emissions globally.

One thing that is for certain the UN is for global control without representation. In other words the United Nations is attempting to be world government at the expense of the United States Constitution or as equally important, at the expense of any sovereign country’s right to govern itself as it’s people see fit.

With respect to the man-made crisis of gun control we now see playing out in media and in Washington D.C. we are witnessing the Rahm Emanuel dictum of never let a crisis go to waste.

What I mean is the president has been a supporter of gun control since his Illinois State Senate days. In addition he has supported the 2007 UN treaty on regulating small arms but could not publicly support it until he won the 2012 election.

Now that the elections are over and in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre the president feels at ease to let his true intentions be known.

Fortunely for him he can lead where he’s most comfortable, from behind, as the media and his political allies stoke the passions of the hard Left creating crisis to do what normally would not be permitted to do. And that is the president that the hard Left intent to enact the most draconian unconstitutional gun control measures in the history of the United States of America.

This effort will coincide with the UN measure to regulate small arms world-wide and voilà! There you have it a Global ban on guns, all guns. Of course Democrats will say that they are simply regulating munitions and arms for the safety of the citizens of the United States however as one of our founders once said, “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

Wild conjuncture or speculation on my part, let’s see!

Twelve Democratic senators have joined 45 Republicans in a fast growing movement to halt progress on an Obama-backed United Nations effort that could bring international gun control into the United States and slap America's gun owners with severe restrictions. (reported in Washington Whispers)

Forbes magazine reports:

While the terms have yet to be made public, if passed by the U.N. and ratified by our Senate, it will almost certainly force the U.S. to:

1. Enact tougher licensing requirements, creating additional bureaucratic red tape for legal firearms ownership.

2. Confiscate and destroy all “unauthorized” civilian firearms (exempting those owned by our government of course).

3. Ban the trade, sale and private ownership of all semi-automatic weapons (any that have magazines even though they still operate in the same one trigger pull – one single “bang” manner as revolvers, a simple fact the ant-gun media never seem to grasp).

4. Create an international gun registry, clearly setting the stage for full-scale gun confiscation.

In short, overriding our national sovereignty, and in the process, providing license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights. (Forbes)

The United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA)

The UN a Global force for preempting national sovereignty (UNODA)
United Nations treaty that is supported by Obama would undermine U.S. Sovereignty Global Gun Control

More proof Obama and the hard Left supports gun global gun control UN Treaty has Obama Support

US Lawmakers are against the international UN treaty for now but they’ve been turned in the past. They can’t be trusted. (Congress against)

Democrats doing what they do best. Using Crisis to govern

Next the Treaty and related documents: