Monday, March 05, 2007

Global warming Theory Implodes as Scientific Evidence Gathers


With a wealth of data now in, Dr. Allegre has recanted his views. To his surprise, the many climate models and studies failed dismally in establishing a man-made cause of catastrophic global warming. Meanwhile, increasing evidence indicates that most of the warming comes of natural phenomena. Dr. Allegre now sees global warming as over-hyped and an environmental concern of second rank.



In what is one of the most stunningly derailing developments in the argument supporting the theory of Global warming, one of the first to sound the alarm about the dangers of global warming, Dr. Claude Allegre a noted geochemist has change his assumptions about global warming which states that by burning fossil fuels, man increased the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere which, for example, has raised the global mean temperature.

With a wealth of data now in, Dr. Allegre has recanted his views. To his surprise, the many climate models and studies failed dismally in establishing a man-made cause of catastrophic global warming. Meanwhile, increasing evidence indicates that most of the warming comes of natural phenomena. Dr. Allegre now sees global warming as over-hyped and an environmental concern of second rank.

Dr. Allegre's break with what he now sees as environmental cant on climate change came in September, in an article entitled "The Snows of Kilimanjaro" in l' Express, the French weekly. His article cited evidence that Antarctica is gaining ice and that Kilimanjaro's retreating snow caps, among other global-warming concerns, come from natural causes. "The cause of this climate change is unknown," he states matter of factly. There is no basis for saying, as most do, that the "science is settled."

Fifteen years ago, Dr. Allegre was among the 1500 prominent scientists who signed "World Scientists' Warning to Humanity," a highly publicized letter stressing that global warming's "potential risks are very great" and demanding a new caring ethic that recognizes the globe's fragility in order to stave off "spirals of environmental decline, poverty, and unrest, leading to social, economic and environmental collapse."

Since then, governments throughout the western world and bodies such as the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have commissioned billions of dollars worth of research by thousands of scientists.

It is time to end this catastrophic waste of money and human researches on the farce known as Global warming. Spend no more money on this unproved theory that is unraveling right before our eyes. Now that Scientist are coming forward, who supporters of this unproven theory can no longer dismiss out of hand as paid for by big oil interest, a real discussion can now begin about real environmental concerns.

There is always the theory of Global cooling if you must continue to scare up money for pop-science pursuits.

3 comments:

  1. Anonymous1:23 PM

    These reicht wing rejects dont understand how a scientific conclusion can or cant be reached with perfect certainty. Rarely if ever does an investigation conclude with total certainty.

    You simply weigh the findings and give your best conclusion on what they say.


    The reicht is using this as a way to say they cant say its human causation (with complete certainty) . Its ridiculous and dishonest. They dont do that. Its almost impossible to find complete certainty in anything when done scientifically.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous1:24 PM

    These reicht wing rejects dont understand how a scientific conclusion can or cant be reached with perfect certainty. Rarely if ever does an investigation conclude with total certainty.

    You simply weigh the findings and give your best conclusion on what they say.


    The reicht is using this as a way to say they cant say its human causation (with complete certainty) . Its ridiculous and dishonest. They dont do that. Its almost impossible to find complete certainty in anything when done scientifically.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sorry friend this scientist is a hard socialist! That's left wing!

    You really should read before you double post!

    ReplyDelete