Tuesday, September 01, 2009

Obama eyes One term rather than release sealed Birth Certificate

President Barack Obama is “quite comfortable” with the prospect of being a one-term president in order to address the issues he is concerned about, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Friday.-- Fred Lucas, CNSNEWS
Well he’s thinking about it! What in the world would make a president think that he is only a one term president? Whatever that is President Barry Soltero is thinking about it! (see 1:24min video)



Do you think it’s Health Care that’s got him thinking one term? Don’t be fooled President Barry Soltero is not that noble. He’s not going to pin his entire presidency on the fight over Health Care. He’s not that principled President Bush maybe but not Barry. (see story)
The White House, facing increasing skepticism over President Obama’s call for a public insurance plan to compete with the private sector, signaled Sunday that it was willing to compromise and would consider a proposal for a nonprofit health cooperative being developed in the Senate.

The “public option,” a new government insurance program akin to Medicare, has been a central component of Mr. Obama’s agenda for overhauling the health care system, but it has also emerged as a flashpoint for anger and opposition. Kathleen Sebelius, the health and human services secretary, said the public option was “not the essential element” for reform and raised the idea of the co-op during an interview on CNN
.-- SHERYL GAY STOLBERG (see source)
How do I know? He’s already floated the possibility of no “public option” before Democrats slapped him back into their reality. The public option is the fundamental reason that Democrats want public health care but at the first sign of resistance Barry sends the message that he was willing to give it up in order to get a health care compromise. So again Barry’s not that principled so what’s the real story?

Barry has come to the realization that he can’t win re-election without showing the American people those precious documents that he has under executive order 13489. (see previous post)

Therefore he allowed his spokes mouths to imply that fighting for his issues are so important to Barry that he would even risk his presidency in order to support them. (Nobody believes that!)

The Barry I’ve come to know will use any excuse to appear to be a martyr while he cowers behind any issue. There’s Health Care that’s as good as any issue while in reality he has accepted the reality of a one term Barry Soltero presidency because he’s ineligible to serve and he knows it.

He should feel pretty clever it’s not everyone who could have hoodwinked the vast majority of the American people into electing a constitutionally unqualified person to be president.

And he did get all of the Czars in place to “fundamentally change America ” so wherever happens to him America will never be the same. Since Barry has been elected some already believe that it is not America anymore (see1:36min. video)



Is that true? “This ain’t America no more?” It’s hard to believe that someone would say that and even harder to think that anyone would think that this ain't America no more but apparently some do.

And why is that, is it because a black social Marxist is President now?

If Americans are paying attention they should understand that Soltero’s birth certificate was only the tip of the iceberg. President Soltero is hiding much more than where he was born. Soltero is hiding a vast left wing Marxist agenda that has to be installed under the cover of 787billion dollar stimulus package and Universal Health Care Reform.

And part of that process is that you know as little about his background as possible and the more you seek the truth about who he is the more that he sees himself as a one term president.

If the American people knew only the half of what Barry Soltero represents he wouldn’t even last the one term.

21 comments:

  1. Barry only needs one term to finish this
    country off.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Der Fuhrer perished by simutaneously biting a cyanide capsule and shooting himself when all was lost. Do you think that Obama will do likewise, or do you think he'll ascend to Heaven?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous10:47 AM

    Birthers. The gift that keeps on giving.

    ReplyDelete
  4. OH, Anon like you've seen evidence that Barry Soetoro was born where he claims.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous11:12 AM

    I've seen the COLB, a prima facie document of the record of his birth, stating Obama was born in Hawaii. I've read the statement from the Hawaiian authority confirming Obama was born in Hawaii. I've seen two birth announcements in two separate Hawaiian newspapers stating he as born in Hawaii.

    I've heard the audio of his step-grandmother from Kenya correcting herself immediately when she said Obama was born in Kenya and repeatedly saying he as born in Hawaii.
    I've read the letter from Obama to Kapiolani Medical Center acknowledging he was born at that facility. Congress has acknowledged that Obama was born in Hawaii. I've read Mrs. Nordyke's acknowledgement that she was in labor at the same time as Obama's mom at Kapiolani. I've seen the sloppy work of lawyer Orly Taitz and concluded she's a petitfogger.

    So what have you got to prove that Obama was born anywhere else besides Honolulu on August 4th, 1961?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Did you know that the name on his birth certificate is Barry Soetoro?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous11:44 AM

    No, I had no idea that the name on his birth certificate is Barry Soetoro. I suppose you have a legitimate source for this.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I do. In fact he has two birth certificates the one you keep referring to as "a prima facie document of the record of his birth" and the one you would let you are I see!

    Get your head out of the sand, you didn't find it a wee bit peculiar for the very first act of a president who promised the most transparent administration in the history of the world to seal every document that would give the American people some idea of who he is?

    Come on now!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous1:54 PM

    President Obama's first order, Executive order 13489, prevents the National Archives from releasing records in its possession. Obama's personal papers are not in their possession. The order has nothing to do with Obama's vital birth records.

    Will you be sharing your source regarding "Barry Soetero" on his birth certificate? Or was this allegation made of whole cloth as well?

    ReplyDelete
  10. What possible records would the National Archives have in its possession on the very first date of this administration? Huh?

    And how would you know that it has absolutely nothing to do with his BC?

    Yes I have it on a very reliable conservative source that BHO is BS on his BC
    Link follows
    http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/07/26/the-obama-birth-certificate-controversy/
    enjoy!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous4:54 AM

    "What possible records would the National Archives have in its possession on the very first date of this administration?"

    The National Archives is the nation's recordkeeper. They hold the offical records of the US Federal Government. Their records go back to the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.

    Obama's EO 13489 creates MORE transparency than was present during the Bush administration, and Obama's birth certificate doesn't fall under EO13489 jurisdiction (only records created during the presidency are covered.)

    EO 13489 revokes G.W. Bush's EO 13233, which had severely limited transparency. Obama's EO 13489 states that only living former Presidents can make claims of executive privilege. This removed one of the most egregious sections of the Bush EO that allowed heirs or designees to make claims of executive privilege for an indefinite period after the death of a former President.

    Obama's EO 13489 is in fact identical to EO 12667 which was in effect during Reagan, Bush1, and Clinton. Just read the docket.

    As for the "Barry Soetero" claim, I ask for a reliable source and you cite blogger Larry Johnson. And you state that you "have it on a very reliable source" that Barack Obama is "Barry Soetero" on his birth certificate.
    Larry Johnson provides no source, just wild speculation. Since Larry Johnson is the same blogger who insisted there was a videotape of Michelle Obama using the phrase "whitey," and concocted quite a tall tale about republicans who had seen this tape (which does not exist), it is impossible for a reaonable person to believe anything Larry Johnson says.

    What baffles me is, you reject the statement of
    Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health --

    “I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawai’i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai’i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai’i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008, over eight months ago.”

    -- and insist on believing a blogger with a history of deceit.

    ReplyDelete
  12. According to Congressional Research Service Report Soetoro’s executive order means that “If an incumbent President claims executive privilege for the records of a former President, the Counsel to the President is required to notify the Archivist, the appropriate former President, and the Attorney General of the action. The Archivist is then prohibited from releasing those records—unless instructed to do so by a court order”

    Obama’s order doesn’t promote greater transparency as you stated his order gives him power to decide which records are to be protected and which records are not, because the same report states that if the incumbent President does not agree that certain records should be covered under executive privilege after the process so stated in Soetoro’s order those records can be released.

    That give him the distinct political advantage to release records that are harmful to the previous administration while giving the mere appearance that he’s for a more transparent government. The apparent transparency is strictly to disclose information on the previous administration not Soetoro’s own, making this order politically partisan other than for the good of the nation as every political move is with Democrats.

    The other fact which supports this conclusion is prior to President Obama's issuance of E.O. 13489, on January 19th 2009, legislation was introduced in the 111th(Democrat Controlled) Congress (H.R. 35) that would statutorily rescind the executive order (E.O. 13233) issued by former President George W. Bush.

    This indicates that Soetoro was working in concert with his fellow partisans laying the ground work for an investigation into the former administration after the executive privilege was lifted.

    Shortly after Soetoro announced that he would look forward indicting that he would not be a part of investigating the Bush administration his AG Eric Holder announced that he would in fact be investigating CIA officials and DOJ lawyers who give advise regarding the law which CIA field officers followed regarding carrying out their duties while they attempt to keep America safe from promised terror attacks against our nation.

    ReplyDelete
  13. As far as your attempted smear on Larry Johnson, Johnson, a former CIA employee who served as a deputy director in the U.S. State Department's Office of Counter Terrorism during a long and decorated career Mr. Johnson’s résumé includes the following:

    • Identifying business opportunities and conducting due diligence for multinational corporations with operations in Europe and Latin America.
    • Advising money center banks, financial institutions, and insurance companies on business opportunities, compliance programs, and exchange risks in Latin America and Europe.
    • Investigating financial crimes and product counterfeiting for corporations with international operations.
    • Designing terrorism war games to test US military readiness and civilian consequence management capabilities.
    • Assessing terrorist threats and recommending counter measures for multi-national corporations, government and non-profit business, academic, and social entities.
    • Designing, evaluating, and implementing technologies and security measures and for security related companies, airlines, airports, and government entities.
    • Evaluating database systems for the private sector and governments for tracking chemical and biological terrorist threats.
    "Mr. Johnson has analyzed terrorist incidents for a variety of media including the Jim Lehrer News Hour, National Public Radio, ABC's Nightline, NBC's Today Show, the New York Times, CNN and the BBC. Mr. Johnson has authored several articles for publications, including Security Management Magazine, the New York Times, and The Los Angeles Times. He has lectured on terrorism and aviation security around the world, including the Center for Research and Strategic Studies at the Ecole Polytechnique in Paris, France. He represented the U.S. Government at the July 1996 OSCE Terrorism Conference in Vienna, Austria.
    http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Larry_Johnson
    Keith Olbermann used Johnston as a credible source regarding terrorism and other subject matter as well,.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QK5-jIfOBjQ
    Sorry I’ll stick to Larry Johnson as being credible over anything that you have to offer!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous2:45 PM

    "Sorry I’ll stick to Larry Johnson as being credible over anything that you have to offer!"

    Really? You should read and learn a bit more about Larry, just as you did Executive Order 13489 which you now realize had nothing to do with Obama's birth certificate -- and you'll come to the similar conclusion that your information was wrong.

    And let us know when that Michelle Obama "whitey" tape turns up.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous3:00 PM

    Larry Johnson? Dude, you need to read this:

    http://michellemalkin.com/2008/06/03/where-is-the-purported-michelle-obama-whitey-video/

    Especially the links on "Larry Johnson is not, not, not to be trusted."

    And you call this guy credible?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anon,
    EO13489 has everything to do with Soetoro limiting access to his records while permitting him authority to release Bush's records, purely partisan and political!

    You falsely claimed that the order produced more transparency it doesn't! Now if I go by your standards that false claim would make your word unreliable therefore you are not credible and can't be trusted.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous9:45 AM

    "EO13489 has everything to do with Soetoro limiting access to his records . . ."

    The order does nothing of the kind.

    The Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2009 (H.R. 35) limits the authority of presidents and former presidents to block the release of presidential records. The bill sets deadlines for the review of records prior to release, gives the incumbent president the authority to reject former presidents' claims of privilege, restricts the ability to assert privilege claims to presidents and former presidents, and eliminates the ability of vice presidents to make privilege claims concerning vice presidential records.

    The bill also overturns Executive Order 13233, which was issued on November 1, 2001 by President George W. Bush. That order broadened the authority of presidents and former presidents to block the release of presidential records, extended that authority to former presidents' heirs, and granted similar powers to vice presidents concerning vice presidential records..

    H.R. 35 was passed by the House on January 7, 2009 and referred to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on January 8, 2009. On January 21, 2009, President Barack Obama issued Executive Order 13489 concerning presidential records, which revoked Executive Order 13233.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anon you are the gift that keeps on giving! None of what you just post is true and to boot it is utterly laughable. You said:

    The Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2009 (H.R. 35) limits the authority of presidents and former presidents to block the release of presidential records. The bill sets deadlines for the review of records prior to release, gives the incumbent president the authority to reject former presidents' claims of privilege, restricts the ability to assert privilege claims to presidents and former presidents, and eliminates the ability of vice presidents to make privilege claims concerning vice presidential records.

    The bill also overturns Executive Order 13233,


    The sheer scope of your ignorance is astonishing (H.R. 35) does nothing because as every first year government student knows a bill, as such, must go to the Senate after the House and then that bill must be voted on and passed by both houses. Then that bill is sent to the president to be signed into law before it has any authority. None of this has happened.

    Though this bill was pasted in the House, The Presidential Records Act has not even been discussed in the Senate. Neither has it been voted on by the Senate and it certainly has not been signed into law by Soetoro!

    You are wrong, your information is unreliable and you have discredited yourself as a credible proponent of your arguments. You are not credible!

    Here allow me to instruct you in the ways of how our government works (please follow link)
    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-35

    This link proves beyond the shadow of a doubt that you are a mere boy attempting to debate in an adult world.

    But please come back anytime every blog needs comic relief! And Boy you’re mine!!!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous6:55 AM

    There really is no need for name calling.

    At least you don't think the Executive Order has anything to do with Obama's birth certificate anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous7:20 AM

    It's an Executive Order, not a law, signed by President Obama on January 21st.

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/ExecutiveOrderPresidentialRecords/

    ReplyDelete