Friday, September 25, 2009

They never sang praises to President Bush

President Barry Soetoro in the classroom with our children

Sounds strange because it is. Fact is you can’t name a time in U.S. history when school children were taught to sing a song to a U.S. president. Go ahead name just one… I didn’t think so.

Students did not sing praises to President Bush but they are being encouraged to singing praises to President Barry Soetoro.

September 8, 2009 the Barry Soetoro administration created a national controversy with an intended speech to the children of America. While we don’t know what the original speech would have been. And we’ll never know what President Soetoro originally intended to say because his speech was reconfigured due to parent protest all across the nation, many Soetoro supporters are now claiming that the speech was harmless and parents overreacted by keeping their children home. But I don’t think so.

What we do know is that President Soetoro intended to have the students thinking about him this school year. That fact was in the curriculum that was released by the Department of Education, children were instructed to write a letter explaining how they could help the president. Teaches were instructed to hold the children accountable to their goals to help the president throughout the year. That idea too was change when parents protested. (see previous post)

Parents and School administrators had the right to be concerned because any learned person knowledgeable regarding propaganda techniques used in Stalinist and Red Communism recognized the techniques that the Soetoro administration was attempting to employ on our children. Those same techniques were used in Nazi Germany as well. (see 2:57mins video)

Weird and strange right? Well follow are your and my children in America being indoctrinated in much the same way today. (see 2:25min video)

Just an isolated incident? I don’t think so. (see 3:17min video)

This indoctrination is happening all across America to the young minds that are not aware that they are being used as political pawns for change. (see 3:09min video)

These haunting and unbelievable videos are demonstrative of a phenomenon happening in the schools all across America. Seemingly innocuous activities full of subliminal messages that children are not mature enough to cope with.

Some are suggesting that Soetoro’s September 8 speech was totally harmless and even appropriate. For those who say that they are wrong on both counts. Everything that Soetoro does has an ulterior motive because he is trained in the methods Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, which is a rule book for how to undermine the government by stealth.

They never sang praise to President Bush or to any other U.S. president for that matter. You should be concerned. You should be very concerned!


  1. Anonymous5:33 AM

    Fraulein Alaphiah:

    You have barely scratched the surface. Have a lok at these Glorius Obama Youth Videos that will lead the Amerikan Fatterland to Victory after Victory:






    Heil Obama!

  2. Anonymous10:16 AM

    "And we’ll never know what President Soetoro originally intended to say because his speech was reconfigured due to parent protest all across the nation . . "


  3. You've got some nerve when you've been discredited on this site for lying about citations!

    Here's the citation and don't try to say that it was discredited because you don't what to believe it.

    Also I'm not posting it for you. I'm posting it to show to the rest of the readers here that you are a unreasonable partisan.

    See citation following:

  4. Anonymous11:39 AM

    Did you watch the video?

    CNN Reporter: "You have no information that the White House changed the text of the speech. You don't have any inside knowledge of that."

    Jim Greer: "No, I don't." And he continues to opinionate.

    You translate that into:
    "his speech was reconfigured due to parent protest all across the nation"

    For someone who accuses Obama of being a liar, you've certainly told a whopper here. If it were Obama saying this, you'd devote paragraphs to it.

    Your blog would be stronger and would attract more readers if you based your opinions on facts, and not baseless speculation.

  5. Did you view the entire video? Unlike you I allow the full discussion not just what suits my cause. The full video makes the case that the White house doctored the speech after being called on it.

    You are a classic leftwing ideologue, you have a history of only extracting what suits your argument.

    I'm touched by your concern about my blog (sniff, sniff)
    I'm sure that the reason that you are one of my most faithful readers is because you find what's posted here thought provoking and compelling!

    Why else would you spend your valuable time reading my every post on a daily basis.

    Keep reading though when you learn to put your biases aside you will learn something! Cheers!

  6. Well stated and defended. Conservative bloggers tend to approve dissenting opinions so that they can be debated, educated, etc. Liberal bloggers often remove opposing viewpoints or attack the messenger instead of the message.

    Keep fighting the good fight!

  7. Anonymous1:50 PM

    Fraulein Alaphiah:

    You've snookered yourself again! The videos I posted were Hitler Jungund Videos wit a Obam-Hitler Jungend Video posted for comparison.

    Where's your sense of humor? Don't you get the irony? Are you as sour as those Liberals you fight? Were you baptised in Vinegar?

  8. MD,
    I allow your comments because I attempt to allow great leadway in discuss. If you would prefer that I not allow any of your comments I can oblige you in that respect as well.

    Let me know...

  9. Anonymous5:18 PM


    My point was to compare the Obama Youth Videos with the Hitler Youth Videos. I found them strikingly similar.

    You didn't?

    I'd think you'd know me better than to think that I would be confrontational with you other than in a backhanded facetious manner.

    Kindly have another look at those videos and tell me if there is a similarity.


  10. Anonymous6:47 PM

    "Unlike you I allow the full discussion not just what suits my cause. The full video makes the case that the White house doctored the speech after being called on it."

    It doesn't make the case, it alleges the case. Big difference. It's opinion, which you state as fact.

  11. LOL I seem to remember this little exchange between us:
    Anon you are the gift that keeps on giving! None of what you just post is true and to boot it is utterly laughable. You said:

    The Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2009 (H.R. 35) limits the authority of presidents and former presidents to block the release of presidential records.

    The bill sets deadlines for the review of records prior to release, gives the incumbent president the authority to reject former presidents' claims of privilege, restricts the ability to assert privilege claims to presidents and former presidents, and eliminates the ability of vice presidents to make privilege claims concerning vice presidential records.

    The bill also overturns Executive Order 13233,

    The sheer scope of your ignorance is astonishing (H.R. 35) does nothing because as every first year government student knows a bill, as such, must go to the Senate after the House and then that bill must be voted on and passed by both houses. Then that bill is sent to the president to be signed into law before it has any authority. None of this has happened.

    Here you state as fact a complete lie! You remember that Anon? I do.

  12. Anonymous4:43 AM

    Yes, that was the Executive Order which you initially brought up and mistakenly believed had something to do with concealing the President's birth certificate. I was happy to correct you and show you it had nothing do with his birth certificate.

    Nothing I wrote was a lie. I didn't say the Senate passed it yet. Now that would be a lie. The bill has passed in the house. It's now been referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

  13. Anonymous4:55 AM

    In response to my compilation of other indoctrination videos on YouTube:

    Alaphiah said...
    You've got some nerve when you've been discredited on this site for lying about citations!

    What is that all about? Do not those videos support your case? Don't be CRASS.


  14. LOL, See that's why I enjoy delving into your twisted logic so much. In your mind a complete and utter lie, a lie that you told is true.

    Look your story isn't even straight here. Neither the House or Senate passes (in your words) an Executive Order. An Executive Order is just that an Executive Order.

    The only mistakes made in that conversation were made by you attempting to defend the indefensible.

    The fact is, as of this date we have seen none of the records of Barry Soetoro's early years only the manufactured documents that are released to have his sycophants such as yourself defend.

    But please keep in touch because when those records are finally released you and I will have much to discuss!

  15. Sorry MD that was not meant for you! My apologizes. Regards

  16. Anonymous6:51 AM

    Indoctrination is a terrible thing. This video certainly proves that.

  17. Anonymous7:53 AM

    When you wrote:

    "Get your head out of the sand, you didn't find it a wee bit peculiar for the very first act of a president who promised the most transparent administration in the history of the world to seal every document that would give the American people some idea of who he is?"

    you were indeed mistaken.

    "The fact is, as of this date we have seen none of the records of Barry Soetoro's early years only the manufactured documents that are released to have his sycophants such as yourself defend."

    So now you claim, as fact, that he's produced manufactured documents. This is your M.O. In your book, wild allegations are facts. Speculation is evidence. It's a disturbing pattern I see not only on this blog, but on sites like Free Republic as well.

  18. Anonymous10:31 AM


    Did those videos help or inspire? Is my research of use to you, or do you want to rely solely on brookie?

    How about joining AAAcorn on Facebook?

  19. Anon,
    I so much enjoy your feeble attempts to confuse fact with your leftwing logic.

    Please answer. Which of the following documents has Barry Soetoro produced: kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, the original vault copy (OVC) of his birth records, or his adoption records.

    I'm waiting...

  20. MD,
    Those were definitely a help! Thank you!

  21. Anonymous2:13 PM

    Ah, there it is, the old list you see on Free Republic over and over again. As if you've ever asked any candidate in the past to produce all that material. Kindergarten records? Come on.

    Nothing on your list has anything to do with eligibiblity.

  22. Again I'm waiting... Even you can't deny that the most open and transparent administration in the history of the United States as Soetoro promised is suffering because of this blatant lack of transparency.

    You should be concerned and here's why, if it is an old list that means that Soetoro has failed to answer the people's concerns regard this question.

    If you have seen it repeatedly that's an indication that more and more people are becoming aware there is a problem with the vetting process which allowed a person that we know next to nothing about to become president.

    It's your opinion that the list has nothing to do with Soetoro's eligibility (you might check your spelling on that word) However there are over 400,000 and growing people who differ from your opinion.

    If Soetoro continues to ignore this issue it will bite him right in the 2012 election cycle.

    I'm waiting...

  23. Anonymous4:23 PM

    How will this "bite him in the 2012 election cycle"? The birther nonsense was going around well before the 2008 election and a majority of reasonable Americans shrugged off the fringe kooks and voted for Obama.

    Every lawsuit about this has been dismissed. Crackpot lawyer Orly Taitz is going to be penalized with a $10,000 sanction on October 5th for filing frivolous lawsuits. There is not a shred of evidence that President Obama was born anyplace else except Honolulu in August of '61. This movement has no traction, just repetition of the same insane allegations. Kindergarten records? College grades from 20 years ago? You can't be serious.

    As long as he ignores it, the worse the birthers look. It's bad for the entire GOP.

    And Good God, who on Earth could the GOP ever run against Obama and hope to win? They have no one.

    You are precious. I come here for the comedy and you keep delivering.

  24. Maybe Barry should just show us some proof
    that he is really eligible,then the "baseless
    speculation" would end. It seems that he can't
    for fear of being found out to be a fraud.
    We already know that he lies or for you
    kool-aid drinking sensitive types, lets
    just say that he is less than honest.

    You would think that even his most devoted
    shills would have a few questions of their

  25. Anon,
    You're really not paying attention are you? Soetoro is losing the coalitions that put him in office daily. Becuase of his radical policies and race driven politics. The Independents leaving, White voters leaving, even RINO's are leaving.

    Only you of the Daily Kos George Soros special interest groups continuencies are left.

    With ACORN crippled they wouldn't be able to fix this election.

    In a fair fight anyone Conservatives put up will beat Soetoro with one question. "Where's the birth certificate?"

  26. Anonymous4:30 AM

    Americans don't care about George Soros, Acorn, Van Jones, the fact that some folks, for some reason, can't read a Certification of Live Birth that proves the President is a natural born citizen, 20 kids in a classroom singing a song, or any of this other Beck-Hannity-Limbaugh-Malkin silliness.

    Health-care reform, a new stem-cell research bill, the cooperation of China and Russia, a turnaround in America's standing in international politics, and an improved economy are neither radical policies nor race-driven politics.

    Americans care about their 401(k) accounts, which are worth a heck of alot more today than there were nine months ago, and will be worth even more in 2012.

    Right-wing pundits would do best in dropping the birther nonsense and general silliness and concentrating on ways to improve the lives of Americans. If they don't start now, Obama will win a second term in a cakewalk.