Thursday, May 13, 2010

40 Million Mexican Revolutionaries inside the Belly of the Beast

We see ourselves, all of us here, as the Northern Front of a Latin America revolutionary movement. There are more than 40 million of our people north of the Rio Grande. That means to them (U.S. citizens)that’s 40 million potential revolutionaries north of the border inside of the belly of the beast.—Ron Gochez, History teacher Sanchee High School in California
AND YOU SO NAƏVELY THOUGHT THIS WAS ABOUT MISGUIDED U.S. LAWS

We are no longer speaking about Comprehensive Immigration Reform what we are really speaking about according to California High School History teacher Ron Gochez is Revolution!

According to Gochez White people are frail and racist and deserve to have their country overrun by what Gochez considers that rightful owners of this country, Mexicans. That is not surprising considering the source but what is surprising is that there are people in our government that share Gochez’s beliefs. People in our White house and Congress share Mr. Gochez’s beliefs.

According to Gochez there are 40 million Mexicans in the United States not just the official 12 million that the Barry Hussein Soetoro will admit to. And these 40 million invaders are posed to make vast improvements to the United States. And when these revolutionaries are done with the United States the United States will be just as well governed as Mexico or Columbia, or Venezuela. (see 4:55min video)




We see ourselves, all of us here, as the Northern Front of a Latin America revolutionary movement. There are more than 40 million of our people north of the Rio Grande. That means to them (U.S. citizens)that’s 40 million potential revolutionaries north of the border inside of the belly of the beast.

So when you think about why they (U.S. citizens) want to keep us out, of all people, that’s why. Because they know that we now know the truth, they know that we, “La Raza” we’re professionals, we’re educators, we are revolutionary students, what does that mean?

We are not just a regular culture anymore we are a culture of revolutionary spirit and that’s the fear!

So that being said I want to leave you with this, as a revolutionary and with revolutionary concepts let’s be clear about one thing our enemy is not the minutemen, our enemy is not the minutemen because the minutemen are not the ones who have killed over 4,600 people at this border.

But our enemy is the same enemy as Hugo Chavez, as Hugo Chavez has, our enemy is the same enemy that has kept Africa poor, our enemy is the same enemy that has kept Asia poor, our enemy is Capitalism and Imperialism.-- Sanchee H.S. history teacher Ron Gochez, La Raza Rally at UCLA
Ron Gochez’s sentiments are not new. These intentions have been underlining the illegal Mexican invasion of the United States for over the last 20 years no matter what official or unofficial U.S. government positions have been.

"We're going to take over all the political institutions of California. California is going to be a Hispanic state and anyone who doesn't like it should leave. If they [Anglos] don't like Mexicans, they ought to go back to Europe." -- Mario Obledo, former California secretary of health and welfare and co-founder of Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF)

Recently Liberals in the Democrat Party have planned to use the 40 million revolutionaries that are inside the belly of the beast to advance their political agenda of Liberalism. Like mutual parasites the Mexican revolutionaries and the Liberal Democrats feed off of one another.

Democrats’ plans are to use illegal Mexican invaders in this country to swell Democrat ranks thereby corrupting the election process of this country while taking and maintaining power. All the while the illegal Mexican invaders use the Liberal Democrat non-enforcement of borders in their quest of “Reconquista”, or taking back land which they claim that was stolen from them.

But let’s not forget the actual history between the two countries:

1821: Spain accepts Mexican independence.
1836: Texas breaks free of Mexican rule.
1846-48: Mexico loses much of its territory in the Mexican-American War. Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo signed.
1867: American Union Army assists Mexico’s Benito Juarez, a democratic reformer, removes France from Mexico.
1910: Mexican Revolution.
1914: U.S. Marines enter Veracruz.
1916: U.S. chases Pancho Villa out of New Mexico.
1938: Mexico nationalizes PEMEX. Cardenas and Roosevelt sign Good Neighbor Policy.
1942: Mexico supports U.S. in WWII. Relations generally stable during postwar years.
1960s: Tourism industry thrives, Mexican nationalism rises.
1971: U.S. imposes 10 percent tariff on all imports, hurting Mexico, which sends almost 70 percent of its exports to the U.S.
1980s: Mexico supports nationalist movements in Nicaragua and El Salvador. U.S. drug war creates mutual tensions.
1992: North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) signed. U.S. moves plants to Mexico to exploit cheap labor.
1995: Devastating Mexican peso devaluation.
2003: Mexican population in U.S. reported to have increased 10 percent in just three years, mostly as a result of illegal immigration. (source)

Even so Mexican agents have infiltrated the government of our country and are speaking seditiously against the United States and on behalf of Mexico to the detriment of U.S. interests. Take note of what’s happening in California as Mexican descendants in publicly held offices speak similar to Ron Gochez:

Art Torres, California Democratic Party chairman, at the Latino Summit Response to Prop 187 at U.C. Riverside (Jan. 14, 1995):
"Power is not given to you, you have to take it! People say to me when I was on the Senate floor, when I was in the Senate, why do you fight so hard for affirmative action programs. And I tell my white colleagues: because you're gonna need them. Remember, 187 is the last gasp of white America."

Antonio Villaraigosa, former speaker of the California State Assembly and present Los Angeles City Council member-elect, discussing Prop 187 with a KABC-TV, Los Angeles reporter (July 29, 1999):
Reporter: "What happens to the will of the people?"

Villaraigosa: "Well, the will of the people is something all of us have to respect, but when the will of the people is unconstitutional, the will of the people is null and void."

Mario Obledo, former California secretary of health and welfare and co-founder of Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), interviewed on radio station KIEV, Los Angeles (June 17, 1998):

"We're going to take over all the political institutions of California. California is going to be a Hispanic state and anyone who doesn't like it should leave. If they [Anglos] don't like Mexicans, they ought to go back to Europe."

Gloria Molina, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, speaking at the 1997 Southwest Voter Registration Education Project:

"We demand to be counted. And what we know as well is that the big giant that they keep talking about is awakening. And he's pretty angry about what's going on. Ya basta! [Enough!] This community is no longer going to stand for it. … And our vote is going to be important. But I gotta tell you that a lot of people are saying, 'I'm going to go out there and vote because I want to pay them back.'"

Pay who back?

Fabian Nunez, California assemblyman, at the Latino Summit Response to Prop 187 at U.C. Riverside (Jan. 14, 1995):

"Each of you, get ten people to go with us on that march in Washington, D.C., and I guarantee you just as we mobilized 150,000 to the streets of Los Angeles on October 16, we will mobilize 1 million people and bring Washington to a standstill, and those rednecks that are out there making decisions for the betterment of their communities will think twice before they push forward anti- immigrant legislation against our community."

State Sen. Nell Soto, D-Ontario, June 25, 2003, San Bernardino Town Hall meeting to discuss SB60, the bill that would grant driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, responding to critics who say the legislation promotes illegal immigration:

"Guess what?" Soto said. "The immigrants are already here. I welcome them. I hope they keep coming."

Do any of these quotes strike anyone as marginally racist or irresponsible?

'Since We Stole It, Let Them Steal It Back'

On June 17, I watched an incredible exchange during the legislative hearing over the Matricula Consular card (SB522) introduced by Manny Diaz, D-San Jose. The bill would require every state public officer or employee to accept, for identification purposes, the card as equivalent to a California driver’s license or ID card issued by the DMV.

Statements in favor included MALDEF, La Raza, the League of California Cities, the City of Los Angeles, and The Friends Committee on Legislation.
When the speaker stated "Opposition to the Bill?" a clearly audible "Oh God, same jerks" could be heard by all.

Statements opposed included several law enforcement and police organizations and the Federation of Americans for Immigration Reform (FAIR). Yeh Ling-Ling, the executive director of the Diversity Alliance for a Sustainable America (DASA), stated:

"It frightens me to see that our government is accepting ID cards issued by foreign governments. For example, in the land of my ancestry, China, the level of fraudulent documents is very high. Let’s say from the Philippines, Vietnam, Cambodia, where I lived, with money you can buy basically anything. Including documents.

"After the bombings [Sept. 11], I urged Congress to protect our borders. Very few congressional members listened. After the bombings, where thousands of people died, people were saying, it was unthinkable. Please, think of the list of what Mexico has been trying to do. What Mexican-American leaders, what many of them, have said. Mario Obledo said in 1998, quote, ‘eventually we are going to take over all the political institutions of California.’

"They said publicly that they are going to use immigration to control the Southwest, retake the Southwest, and eventually, take over the entire U.S. So please listen to those statements carefully."

Interruption by State Sen. John Vasconcellos, D-San Jose: "Since we stole it from them, why do you say it’s unfair to steal it back from us?"

Yeh Ling-Ling: "I’m sorry?"
Vasconcellos: "We stole it from them in the first place."
Yeh Ling-Ling: "Exactly what do you want to have happen?"
Vasconcellos: "I found your testimony (shaking his head, putting his glasses down) … I don’t want to debate you."
Yeh Ling-Ling: (with a questioning look) "Exactly?"
Vasconcellos: "I don’t want to debate you. I’ve listened to what you’ve had to say, period."

Since nobody in the chamber voiced any objection to Vasconcellos’ remarks, the reasonable inference is, yes, the Left is moving even further left, and American legislators like Vasconcellos believe that since Mexico was stolen by the U.S., there really isn’t anything to debate.

It should be noted as well that Ling-Ling has been confronted by other California Democrats while delivering similar testimony. Recently, during a hearing on SB60 (driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants), Sen. Nell Soto castigated Ling-Ling in a manner similar to Vasconcellos’, stating that her remarks were "blatantly racist," had no place at a legislative hearing and "really insulted the intelligence of some of us here."

Ling-Ling, whose group is based in Oakland, responded from the audience: "They were quotes, OK, from Mexican-American leaders."
What could Soto say? It was an embarrassing moment for SB60 backers.-- Patrick Mallon

40 Million plus illegal Mexican revolutionaries are in the United States (the belly of the beast) according to High School teacher Ron Gochez positioning themselves for “Reconquista” the taking back of U.S. land for Mexico and they have agents within the U.S. government aiding and betting them in this act of sedition against the United States of America. What Liberal Democrats call this very serious problem, this anti-America act, they call it Comprehensive Immigration Reform.

My question is what do you call it?

2 comments:

  1. Anonymous8:13 AM

    It's "Democratic Party" not "Democrat Party."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for your opinion. However I would never ever confuse the Democratic process with the Party that is anti-Constitution and anti-American. No it's the Democrat Party. Let's not get it twisted.

    The word Democratic by defination is:characterized by or advocating or based upon the principles of democracy or social equality; "democratic government"; "a democratic country"; "a ...
    representing or appealing to or adapted for the benefit of the people at large; "democratic art forms"; "a democratic or popular movement"; "popular thought"; "popular science"; "popular fiction"

    The Democrat Party is a Progressive Socialists Party that employees Fascist tactics to force it's Socialist agenda on the people.

    No way I'm I calling them the Democratic Party!

    ReplyDelete