Bill Maher in the Partisan Liberal Bubble

It took the President 14 days before he called the attack in Benghazi an act of terror— Gov. Mitt Romney, 2nd presidential debate

The Question is did president Barry Hussein Soetoro specifically say that the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi Libya, an attack that killed 4 US citizens was an act of terror. Precisely did the president acknowledge that the four deaths of US citizens resulted from acts of terrorism committed by terrorists?

The answer is a resounding no he did not! Not at least the day after in the Rose garden September 12, 2012, no, it took him fourteen days to acknowledge it and say that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorists attack. Though the president did use the word “terror” in the remarks he made the day after Islamic terrorist killed our Ambassador and consulate workers he did not call the killings of US citizens or the attack on the consulate a terrorist attack. This is the argument. The president and his administration attempted to deceive the American people by telling them that what happened in Benghazi was a spontaneous reaction to a video insulting the prophet Mohammed.

This is important because the question is not whether the president simply said the word “terror” as Democrats, Liberal Progressives and Bill Maher are attempting to make the case. The question is did the president say the Benghazi attack was an act of terror or terrorism. This is the point that Gov. Romney has made. Following is what the president said.

Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe. No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this nation. Alter that character or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.
Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act and make no mistake justice will be done.—Barry Hussein Soetoro

(see 1:47min video)



So why is the president, Candy Crowley, Bill Maher, the media and Democrats acting as if president Soetoro specifically called the Benghazi attack terrorism or an “act of terror.”

Semantics or words, phrases and their meanings have never been more abused then when a Democrat trained Lawyer become President of the United States. Or when Democrats come into power.

William Jefferson Clinton introduced the world to the relativity of the word “is” as it applies to is’s meaning. He further defined oral sex as not sex but later confessed to inappropriate behavior in the oval office. The inappropriate behavior was he and Monica Lewinsky engaging in oral sex in the oval office. Hence, the reason that word “sex” is in the phase “oral sex.” Oral sex is genitalia involved in sexual activity. Therefore the former president lied.

It is from these intricate semantics that Liberals weave their webs of deception. Deception, from which their composite worlds are made. These semantics are the way that president Obama can pretend he specifically called the Benghazi murders acts of terror when he did not.

Just why is this important?

President Barry Hussein Soetoro is playing word games. You see, his administration placed a moratorium on the words terror, terrorist and terrorism, this is commonly known. They will virtually avoid the use of the word with relations to Islamic terrorist, this is also known.

As this approach relates to Benghazi Libya, the Soetoro administration initially blamed the death of four U.S. consulate workers on a video made in the United States for fourteen days. More directly the president and his surrogates insisted that this particular terrorist attack was a spontaneous riot sparked by Islamic passions stoked because of an insult of the prophet Mohammed made by a obscure YouTube video.

Bill Maher attempted to confuse this issue further by diverting America’s attention from the fact that the president did not say the attack on Benghazi was an act of terror or a terrorist attack. What the president said was, “No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this nation.” The fact that he used the word “acts” signifies that he is not speaking specifically concerning Benghazi. He was speaking in a broad sense. The mere fact that he said the word “terror” in no way means that he called the Benghazi murders terrorism or an act of terror, he only said that not any act of terror will weaken America’s will.

Bill Maher took the words of Gov. Romney and the president out of context to satisfy his own political bias. Maher’s blind partisanship faults Republicans when in actuality Democrats are misleading on this issue. (see 8:39mins video)

In the Republican bubble in took the president 14 days before he said, “act of terror,” but we know, we actually have the transcript where he said, “act of terror” Show the quote Obama said the next day “No acts of terror.”—Bill Maher

The truth is the president, Candy Crowley, Bill Maher and the media are all wrong. President Soetoro did not call the Benghazi attack an attack of terrorism or say, that the murders and attack were acts of terror what he did was address a broad issue that no act of terror will be enough to daunt the American spirit. This is not the same as saying that the attack on the mission in Benghazi is a Terrorist attack. That is the issue which Gov. Romney raised not the phony argument whether the president simply said the word terror. (see 3:29mins video)



I use to think that Maher’s wasn’t stupid however this lack of intellectual honestly goes well beyond the Liberal bubble, this is diabolically wick or one cell amoeba stupid.

I wonder if he thinks the American people are as stupid as he is. I bet he does.