Wednesday, April 02, 2008

Considering Al Gore

Al and Tipper Gore sharing a intimate moment with us all

If neither Mr Obama nor Mrs Clinton has the 2,025 delegates needed to win the nomination, and if both appear unable to beat Mr McCain, under one scenario a group of about 100 party elders - the "super-delegates" - could sit out the first ballot in Denver, preventing either candidate winning outright, and then offer Mr Gore the nomination for the good of the party.-- Tim Shipman
They're kidding right?

Democrats want the win in November and fearing that their two History making candidates who have fought their way to the top of their nomination process are flawed beyond electability they are casting about for an alternative.

But Al Gore? Really? Has desperation brought them so low that their two history making prospects, a Black man and a woman, makes even Al Gore look tenable?

What has brought the high flying Democrats to this nadir? Need I remind you that it was Al Gore that single handedly caused the ultra-partisanship that drives the hate from the left today?

Gore conceded to George Bush on election night November 1999 and upon advice from his advisers took his concession back thus launching the country into the nasty bitterness that divides us today.

At a time when Gore could have shown statesmanship and conceded graciously for the good of the country he chose the divisive road of counting Chads that led to the red state blue state divide. So the father of Global warming can lay claim to the fact that he invented the reason that Democrats are so crazed today.

So it is not at all surprising that the conflict that Democrats openly waged against Republicans has found its way home inside the Democrat camp. Boy Karma is great isn’t it?

Eight years of total Bush bashing and the politics of personal destruction have commentated into Democrats virtually destroying one another with the same tactics, dirty tricks and lies that they used against Republicans, they’re using these things against one another.

No matter who comes out of this dog fight they will be crippled in their future attacks against Republicans because no one, but the dumbest partisan Democrat is going to believe the things Democrats say about Republicans are anything but some fake “paint by the numbers” scripted play book attacks that they will use against anyone Democrat or Republican.

So after waging attacks against one another that would normally be reserved for Republican enemies both Democrat candidates are severely wounded prompting senior Party Democrats to consider the prospects of dumping both the front runner Sen. Barack Obama and his challenger Sen. Hillary Clinton at the Democratic Convention by withholding their Superdelegate votes in the first round of voting and when neither candidate has enough votes to claim the nomination they would then draft Al Gore to be the Democrat nominee.

So much for disenfranchising Democrat voters and count every vote, every vote counts, Democrat Party leaders would simply void out their whole primary election casting aside hundreds of thousands of votes. But it would be for the good of the Party!

Do Democrats honestly believe that anyone but them would have Al Gore this Global warming charlatan and profiteer as the President of the United States?

Well maybe Europeans would but the last I checked they're not voting in American elections or are they voting too along with the illegals?

By all accounts this was supposed to be the Democrat’s year yet it appears that they have virtually self destructed by their own made gender, race and pseudo-scientific environmental specific politics.

Now they believe they have no good choices. They know it and now we know that they know it and they know that we know that they know it. Karma!

So all of the talk about groundbreaking first and getting past race and getting past gender have led the Democrats to the same place they they’ve always been in back to the 1950s.

In their hate mongering Democrats have managed to stir up neo-racists against Sen. Obama and the anti-women against Sen. Clinton and their solution? Al Gore a white man.

How ironic if you remember on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 in front of a Georgetown audience Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean is reported to have said the 2008 GOP presidential field, "looks like the 1950s and talks like the 1850s," according to The Georgetown Voice since the GOP nominee is Sen. John McCain but obviously spoken before Democrats realized that they conjured up the hates of the 1950s or a recounting of the actual history of the 1950 and 1850s.

In the 1800s, it was Democrats who gave their lives to perpetuate slavery during the American Civil War, and it was Democrat governors and sheriffs who used fire hoses and attack dogs on black civil rights activists in the 1950s according to an answer to Mr. Deans remarks by Christ Plante.

Such an a lustrous history and fitting too that Democrats are considering dumping the woman and the black that they touted as proof that they were no longer tied to the discriminations of the past.

These same duplicitous Democrats are considering appointing Al Gore as their Democratic nominee thus starting the 21st Century off like they’re back in the future and this after all of that bravado from Howard Dean!

Yes, Democrats are thinking like the 1950s and acting like the 1850s by even considering bringing back yesterday’s old news of Al Gore!


  1. I hate watching someone's dream going up in smoke.

    Sic Transit Alaphiah

  2. Dum res conficiatum fit Octurian.

  3. That would be a dumb move!

    But....... what else is new with the Dems? They seem to have a history of that.

    If neither Obama nor Clinton is considered "able" to win in a national election, what makes anybody think that Al Gore would be any different.

    The Republicans might have had a little concern, going up against Obama, but against Gore, they could run Daffy Duck and be victorious.