Please turn the Global warming up ‘cause it’s Cold

Will someone turn the Global warming up ‘cause its Cold! I’m never amazed at how gullible people are. Sure we all are concerned about our environment and our planet but to allow people to use our concerns against us in this Global warming/Climate change scheme indicates that people in general have lost the ability to reason when so many people are assaulting reason on the topic of Global warming/Climate change.

You’ve probably heard that Los Angeles that bastion of common sense, logic and reason is considering imposing a Global warming tax on its citizens. Oh you haven’t heard?

Well its billed as a "climate change mitigation and adaptation fee,” it targets LA motorist and according to the Orange County Register it would cost motorists either an additional 3 percent motor fuel tax, or up to a $90 annual flat fee, based on vehicle emissions. The new charges would be on top of taxes already paid at the pump. Either option requires a majority approval by a vote of the people.

But wait, what scientific fact(s) is this new Global warming tax based on? Why it’s not base on scientific facts, which support the theory of Global warming/Climate change at all. No, Assemblyman Mike Feuer’s, a Los Angeles Democrat and author of California Assembly Bill 2558, reason for attempting to impose about $400 million in additional taxes on the people of Los Angeles is in his words, "At this point the people of the Los Angeles region have just had it when it comes to traffic and air quality,"

Okay he said “air quality” so I’m guessing that that ties into Global warming/Climate change in some way that Californians only understand.

But really to attempt to sneak a new tax on the people of California on something that they are already paying taxes for “traffic congestion and air quality” by labeling it a Global warming/Climate change is simply unconscionable Assemblyman Feuer. But to have the people vote on taxing themselves on your scheme is criminally insane sir and you should be recalled at the earliest opportunity.

Global warming at best amounts to less than a degree of temperature increase during the past century. If the recent several-year cooling trend is an indication, global warming may be going away.

But because the only "proof" of long-term catastrophic consequences lies in contrived computer models, politicians like Mr. Feuer can insist even as temperatures decline that doomsday still lies ahead unless people tax themselves to fix the problem.—The Orange County Register

But it is not only the little peon politicians who are attempting to abscond with your Global cash the World bank knows a patsy when it sees one (that would be you) and is already plotting on getting all of those “Global warming/Climate change” billions of dollars when you my friend are taxed on your carbon emissions which is coming soon, the tax that is.

At the week-long Bangkok conference, the World Bank pushed its proposals for a $5-10 billion Clean Technology Fund, a $500 million "adaptation" fund and possibly a third fund dealing with forestry.

However, developing countries want climate change cash to be administered through the existing United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC), which they feel is much less under the control of the Group of 8 (G8) richest countries. --Ed Cropley

What’s at stake here is that rich nations, countries like the United States, would be taxed billions of dollars for their carbon emissions and that money will be given to poor nations as payment for our environmental sins. It’s true!

What? You thought that Global warming/Climate change was about saving the Earth? Wrong again it’s about wealth transfer and the World Bank wants in on this cash cow and its cut of the loot.

Before they agree to any sort of restrictions on emissions of the greenhouse gases fuelling global warming, poor countries want firm commitments of billions of dollars in aid from their rich counterparts.

The money will be used for everything from flood barriers against rising sea levels to "clean" but costly power stations, an example of the "technology transfer" developing countries say they need to curb emissions of gases such as carbon dioxide. --Ed Cropley

It’s the Global warming/Climate change hokey-pokey and taking your money is what it’s all about!

Finally, all this talk about the revenues that Global warming/Climate change will produce we forgot the important stuff like actual Global warming!

Well according to David Archibald, a solar scientist speaking at the "Greener Skies 2008" conference an environmental confab in Hong Kong recently this year Global warming/Climate change is mostly dictated by solar cycles, not carbon dioxide levels, as conventional wisdom suggests.

And to top that bit of shocking news off Archibald told the scientist gathered to hear about global warming that they should figure out ways of increasing CO2 output because the sun is not as giving as in the past. More Carbon Dioxide?

In other words according to Archibald trends of Global cooling are afoot. If there is the remotest possibility that Archibald is correct the schemes to collect all of that Global loot would be put in jeopardy so you can believe that Archibald will be silenced even though the Earth hasn’t warmed since 1998.