Thursday, July 03, 2008

Global warming is not Science

Last week marked the 20th anniversary of the mass hysteria phenomenon known as global warming. Much of the science has since been discredited.

NASA now begrudgingly confirms that the hottest year on record in the continental 48 was not 1998, as previously believed, but 1934, and that six of the 10 hottest years since 1880 antedate 1954. Data from 3,000 scientific robots in the world's oceans show there has been slight cooling in the past five years, never mind that "80% to 90% of global warming involves heating up ocean waters," according to a report by NPR's Richard Harris.

Bret Stephens’ “Global Warming as Mass Neurosis” explains that Global warming is not science and that its proponents offer religious like claims about Global warming which are to be believed by faith in spite of the physical evidence that the Earth is actually cooling.

Stephens offers three reasons why Liberals blindly follow Global warming propaganda.

Ideological convenience, theological replacement, and Munchausen syndrome

According to Stephens, global warming is a hodge-podge of all Left leaning Ideological beliefs conveniently wrapped up into and ultimately resulting in a cataclysmic eco- disaster.

Then Stephen seems to suggest that global warming allows the Liberal to replace belief in God and God’s judgment on the earth and man with an animist paganism which ironically has nature pronouncing judgment on man via itself.

Lastly Munchausen syndrome according to the Cleveland clinic, is a type of factitious disorder, or mental illness, in which a person repeatedly acts as if he or she has a physical or mental disorder when, in truth, they have caused the symptoms. People with factitious disorders act this way because of an inner need to be seen as ill or injured

Likewise, Global warming proponents have an unhealthy need to see the earth as injured by mankind (more correctly that would be Munchausen syndrome by proxy). So they have created the perfect multi-symptom conflicted affliction in which the phenomena of cooling or heating, storms or lack of storms, floods or droughts are all symptomatic of Global warming.

Stephens concludes that global warming is not science at all and its adherents are merely sick-souled believers in a theory that is a sick-souled religion.

1 comment:

  1. Anonymous1:17 PM

    Putting aside the argument that Global Warming is fictional, and that the intent is to stifle Capitalism, there are stronger arguments against the Governmental Controls that others seek to impose.

    Global Warming is not a problem unless you make it one. Global Warming is a Solution to the Energy Problem. Global Warming is the result of waste heat in the atmosphere caused by Solar Rays. If we have an excess of Solar Rays, does it stand to reason that we can absorb their Energy with Solar Cells? We can dissapate this waste heat and use it for Energy.
    Global Warming Is A Solution, Not A Problem!

    If You are not part of the Solution, You are part of the Problem. Are you going to develop and use Solar Energy? Or are you going to fly to Europe , financing your trip with Carbon Credits purchased from yourself [what the Catholic Bill O'Reilly castigated as Indulgences] as you STEAL the Nobel Peace Prize from a True Hro, Irena Sendler, like that Gas Bag Al Gore. Speaking of Gas Bags, what is anybody doing about the Helium 3 Fusion Energy Source on the Moon?

    On this eve of the Fourth of July, the Most American Holidays where we pop Chines Firecrackers to the tune of the Russian 1812 Oveture while drinking German Beer and eating Mexican Tacos, I wish you well.

    When you hear the 1812 Overture, listen for that Melodious and Stately Prokeimenon in the Sixth Tone, that Hymn of Deliverance after Tchaikovky's Grande Dimmuendo. For those of you more Protestanly inclined, there is the Swingle's Singers Version.