Thursday, January 07, 2010

Your Responsibility, your Fault Mr. President

Obama doing his usual Finger pointing
“But when a suspected terrorist is able to board a plane with explosives on Christmas Day the system has failed in a potentially disastrous way. And it's my responsibility to find out why, and to correct that failure so that we can prevent such attacks in the future.”—president Barry Hussein Soetoro, January 5, 2010 Security Council press debriefing
Well, well, well in the words of president Soetoro’s former pastor of over twenty years, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, “The chickens have come home to roost. Well almost. If the terrorist chicken, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab had not laid an egg or a Christmas day dud instead of a bomb in this case, 290 people would have been slaughtered in a merciless act of terrorism.

President Soetoro finger pointed at the American intelligence community for this recent failure of security and vowed to get to the bottom of this terrorist breech of the American people’s safety.

But sometimes one simply must look at the man in the mirror for answers. For instance, Barry Soetoro and Democrats have been talking down the Bush terrorism policies since the 2008 presidential campaign. Policies incidentally that have kept us safe from another terrorist attack. Yet in spite of the Bush’s terrorist policies success, as soon as Soetoro took office he began to dismantle some of those policies according to former Vice President Dick Cheney.
The terrorist surveillance program is important. We were challenged in very fundamental ways after 9/11. The nation was threatened; we lost 3,000 people that day.

The biggest task we had as an administration was to make certain that that never happened again, and do everything we could to prevent those kinds of attacks. We put in place certain policies to do that.

The Obama administration campaigned against those policies. And they're now in the process of dismantling some of them.
—Former Vice President Dick Cheney (see source)
And then there is the complete departure from Bush terrorism philosophy. The war on Terror became an “overseas contingency operation” and acts of terrorism were renamed "man-caused disasters" by the Soetoro administration. Add all of the above to the world-wide apology tour and Soetoro’s constant and continual playing down of the terrorism threat, the person who is ultimately responsible for this Christmas day attempted act of terrorism is beginning to come into focus.
"This was a screw up that could have been disastrous. We dodged a bullet but just barely. It was averted by brave individuals not because the system worked and that is not acceptable. While there will be a tendency for finger pointing, I will not tolerate it."—president Barry Hussein Soetoro, as reported by Reuters
So if president Soetoro wishes to know where the breakdown which allowed terrorist, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to attempt to explode his drawers over Detroit Michigan on Northwest Airlines Flight 253 occurred he has to look no further than the man in the mirror.
When our government has information on a known extremist and that information is not shared and acted upon as it should have been...a systemic failure has occurred, and I consider that totally unacceptable.—president Barry Hussein Soetoro
But you wouldn’t expect a finger pointer to take responsibility for something that he did would you?

I didn’t think so.

In spite of all of his feigned outrage and his cover his backside bellicose directives instructing intelligence officials to investigate the near tragedy in which a known and watched terrorist boarded an American Airplane to attempt to blow it up, we already know what went wrong.

Everything that Soetoro has done to minimize the threat of terrorism in the United States since he’s become president has created a pre-9/11 culture in the whole government. The fact that Soetoro used the very term, that intelligence agencies didn’t “connect the dots” with respect to terrorist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab is exactly the language used to explain why American Intelligence Agencies originally didn’t or couldn’t prevent the 9/11 terrorists attacks. No matter what he says now and no matter who he points the finger at he is the president and he is responsible as well as at fault for the Christmas day bomber. (see 8:54min video)



Soetoro is wrong and has been wrong about terrorism all along. Funny thing about finger pointing; when you point a finger there are three fingers pointing back at you.

Dismantling the Bush terrorism policies, downplaying terrorism and Islam’s role in terrorism and attempting to redefine terrorism out of existence are the three fingers pointing back at Barry Hussein Soetoro.

If the intelligence community had any moxie they would report back to the president that he is just as responsible for the Christmas attack as anyone else.

And they’d be telling the truth!

(Following a transcript of the January 5, 2010 Christmas bomber intelligence presser)

THE PRESIDENT: Good afternoon, everybody. I just concluded a meeting with members of my national security team, including those from our intelligence, homeland security and law enforcement agencies involved in the security reviews that I ordered after the failed attack on Christmas Day.

I called these leaders to the White House because we face a challenge of the utmost urgency. As we saw on Christmas, al Qaeda and its extremist allies will stop at nothing in their efforts to kill Americans. And we are determined not only to thwart those plans, but to disrupt, dismantle and defeat their networks once and for all.

Indeed, over the past year, we've taken the fight to al Qaeda and its allies wherever they plot and train, be it in Afghanistan and Pakistan, in Yemen and Somalia, or in other countries around the world.

Here at home, our intelligence, homeland security and law enforcement agencies have worked together with considerable success: gathering intelligence, stitching it together, and making arrests -- from Denver to Texas, from Illinois to New York -- disrupting plots and saving American lives. And these successes have not come without a price, as we saw last week in the loss of our courageous CIA officers in Afghanistan.

But when a suspected terrorist is able to board a plane with explosives on Christmas Day the system has failed in a potentially disastrous way. And it's my responsibility to find out why, and to correct that failure so that we can prevent such attacks in the future.

And that's why, shortly after the attempted bombing over Detroit, I ordered two reviews. I directed Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano to review aviation screening, technology and procedures. She briefed me on her initial findings today, and I'm pleased that this review is drawing on the best science and technology, including the expertise of Secretary of Energy Steven Chu and his department.

I also directed my counterterrorism and homeland security advisor John Brennan to lead a thorough review into our terrorist watch-listing system so we can fix what went wrong. As we discussed today, this ongoing review continues to reveal more about the human and systemic failures that almost cost nearly 300 lives. We will make a summary of this preliminary report public within the next few days, but let me share some of what we know so far.

As I described over the weekend, elements of our intelligence community knew that Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab had traveled to Yemen and joined up with extremists there. It now turns out that our intelligence community knew of other red flags -- that al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula sought to strike not only American targets in Yemen, but the United States itself. And we had information that this group was working with an individual who was known -- who we now know was in fact the individual involved in the Christmas attack.

The bottom line is this: The U.S. government had sufficient information to have uncovered this plot and potentially disrupt the Christmas Day attack. But our intelligence community failed to connect those dots, which would have placed the suspect on the "no fly" list.

In other words, this was not a failure to collect intelligence; it was a failure to integrate and understand the intelligence that we already had. The information was there. Agencies and analysts who needed it had access to it. And our professionals were trained to look for it and to bring it all together.

Now, I will accept that intelligence, by its nature, is imperfect, but it is increasingly clear that intelligence was not fully analyzed or fully leveraged. That's not acceptable, and I will not tolerate it. Time and again, we've learned that quickly piecing together information and taking swift action is critical to staying one step ahead of a nimble adversary.


So we have to do better -- and we will do better. And we have to do it quickly. American lives are on the line. So I made it clear today to my team: I want our initial reviews completed this week. I want specific recommendations for corrective actions to fix what went wrong. I want those reforms implemented immediately, so that this doesn't happen again and so we can prevent future attacks. And I know that every member of my team that I met with today understands the urgency of getting this right. And I appreciate that each of them took responsibility for the shortfalls within their own agencies.

Immediately after the attack, I ordered concrete steps to protect the American people: new screening and security for all flights, domestic and international; more explosive detection teams at airports; more air marshals on flights; and deepening cooperation with international partners.

In recent days, we've taken additional steps to improve security. Counterterrorism officials have reviewed and updated our terrorist watch list system, including adding more individuals to the "no fly" list. And while our review has found that our watch-listing system is not broken, the failure to add Abdulmutallab to the "no fly" list shows that this system needs to be strengthened.

The State Department is now requiring embassies and consulates to include current visa information in their warning on individuals with terrorist or suspected terrorist connections. As of yesterday, the Transportation Security Administration, or TSA, is requiring enhanced screening for passengers flying into the United States from, or flying through, nations on our list of state sponsors of terrorism, or other countries of interest. And in the days ahead, I will announce further steps to disrupt attacks, including better integration of information and enhanced passenger screening for air travel.

Finally, some have suggested that the events on Christmas Day should cause us to revisit the decision to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay. So let me be clear. It was always our intent to transfer detainees to other countries only under conditions that provide assurances that our security is being protected.

With respect to Yemen in particular, there's an ongoing security situation which we have been confronting for some time, along with our Yemeni partner. Given the unsettled situation, I've spoken to the Attorney General and we've agreed that we will not be transferring additional detainees back to Yemen at this time.

But make no mistake: We will close Guantanamo prison, which has damaged our national security interests and become a tremendous recruiting tool for al Qaeda. In fact, that was an explicit rationale for the formation of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. And, as I've always said, we will do so -- we will close the prison in a manner that keeps the American people safe and secure.

Our reviews -- and the steps that we've taken and will continue to take -- go to the heart of the kind of intelligence and homeland security we need in the 21st century. Just as al Qaeda and its allies are constantly evolving and adapting their efforts to strike us, we have to constantly adapt and evolve to defeat them, because as we saw on Christmas, the margin for error is slim and the consequences of failure can be catastrophic.

As these violent extremists pursue new havens, we intend to target al Qaeda wherever they take root, forging new partnerships to deny them sanctuary, as we are doing currently with the government in Yemen. As our adversaries seek new recruits, we'll constantly review and rapidly update our intelligence and our institutions. As they refine our tactics, we'll enhance our defenses, including smarter screening and security at airports, and investing in the technologies that might have detected the kind of explosives used on Christmas.

In short, we need our intelligence, homeland security and law enforcement systems -- and the people in them -- to be accountable and to work as intended: collecting, sharing, integrating, analyzing, and acting on intelligence as quickly and effectively as possible to save innocent lives -- not just most of the time, but all the time. That's what the American people deserve. As President, that's exactly what I will demand.

Thank you very much.

3 comments:

  1. "As I watched the events of the last few days, it is clear once again that President Obama is trying to pretend we are not at war. He seems to think that if he has a low-key response to [the attempt to blow up an airliner] that we won't be at war."

    Richard B. Cheney

    GOOD NEWS! Someday Dick Cheney is going to go away, I promise you that. Is that the best argument du jour he can come up with regarding Obama - that he does not express sufficient emotion or anger? That he is too cerebral. Isn't that what we want in a president? In this way he is much like Jack Kennedy. The angriest statement JFK ever made while president was when he lashed out at "the utter contempt" of the executives at U.S. Steel toward the American people. But even in this instance, Kennedy's tone was measured and restrained. He was not a man given to freaking out. Seriously, would we like a repeat of the shoot-from-the-hip, cowboy idiocy of the Bush/Cheney years? Look at all the good that did us. Obama's seeming, contemplative demeanor is one of the things about the man that reassures me. Call it a silly quirk in my psychological make up, but I like my presidents to think things through. What can I tell you, I'm kind of funny that way.

    http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com

    Tom Degan
    Goshen, NY

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous12:28 PM

    "But you wouldn’t expect a finger pointer to take responsibility for something that he did would you?"

    Obama to take responsibility for security mistakes

    http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/07/obama.terror.report/index.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. We'll have to listen very intently at this carefully crafted Mea culpa.

    This leak of his intentions is an indication that he will take responsibility because he's president but he'll take none of the blame. If he remains true to form he will blame others by inference and implication.

    He's already started check out the line in the link that you sent:

    "But he is not planning to fire anyone for the foul-up, the official said."

    If he's taking responsibility and the blame, then who's he gonna fire? Himself?
    Come on man!!!

    ReplyDelete