But the trustees also said just what, a couple of Fridays ago, that this thing could be insolvent in the next decade. Doesn't something really dramatic have to happen, and as the Congressman suggested, the Republicans have a plan. Do the Democrats have a plan? —Harry Smith, Face the Nation
Apparently Democrats’ plan is Medi-scare or Scare-a-care and the pivot! Democrat National Committee Chairperson Debbie Wasserman-Schultz rolled out the Democrat’s “Howard Dean” plan, which is never answer a question and by all means change the subject.
Don’t let them set the agenda…we think we have to answer the question. You don’t ever have to answer the question. You should answer the question that they should have asked, not the one that they did ask you. And the one that they should have asked you is the one you like. We are going to talk about what we want to talk about… Change the subject…Make them talk about what you want to talk about and be relentless.—Howard Dean (see 1:43min video)
Remember Harry Smith asks Debbie Wasserman –Schultz the question, “Do Democrats have a plan[to save Medicare]”. And following is Wasserman—Schultz’s response (see1:34min video)
If one listens very closely at the end of Ms. Wasserman—Schultz ‘s response was the Democrat plan. According to Wasserman-Schultz , Democrat’s plan is to have Joe Biden fix Medicare.
Now that is Medi-scare!!!
Dohrn: I think you know bombing from the air in order to save people is a terrible idea. It goes bad, people don’t like it.
Interviewer: Is it terrorism?
Dohrn: It usually is terrorism because it’s killing civilian people in large numbers. I think that you can call it you know a message of war to free people but I think that of course you …wars of empire have always been wrapped in the paper and ribbons of democracy and bringing education and freedom to people. It‘s terrorism, when you end up, yes, bombing civilian populations, occupying the land.
Interviewer: To make sure I understand correctly, in this war on terror the U.S. is also a terrorist? Is that what you mean?
Dohrn: That is what I mean.
Former domestic terrorist, wife of William Ayers and president Barry Hussein Soetoro friend Bernadette Dohrn like professor Cornell West seem to have vast philosophical differences with who the president has become. West believes that president Soetoro has became a black mascot of Wall Street oligarchs and a black puppet of corporate plutocrats. And now the president, according to his Liberal critics, has become head of the American killing machine. Furthermore, they believe that the president is proud of that distinction.” (source)In addition, Dohrn believes that Soetoro is a terrorist. (see 3:09min video)
If anyone knows, a terrorist when they see one Bernadette Dohrn should. Dohrn a founder of the Weatherman group, Dohrn was a member of the "Weather Bureau" (name later changed to "Central Committee") is a domestic terrorist. Larry Grathwohl, an FBI informant who was with the Weatherman from autumn 1969 through spring 1970, considered her one of the two top leaders of the organization, along with Bill Ayers.
During this period, the group organized the October 1969 Days of Rage riot in Chicago, which Dohrn led.[20] During the 1970s, the Weathermen bombed federal buildings and police stations.[21] Prior to the March 6, 1970 Greenwich Village townhouse explosion, in which three members of the group were killed as a bomb was being constructed, all members of Weatherman went underground. The group then changed its name to Weather Underground.
Dohrn went underground in early 1970, engaging in bombing activities. (source)
Dohrm believes that U.S. bombings of Libya are acts of terrorism. I believe that without Congressional approval(which Soetoro doesn't have and hasn't sought) president Soetoro is waging an illegal war in Libya. Whether Soetoro’s illegal war is an act of terrorism is something that the American people are going to have to decide.
I was hacked it happens to people, you move on. This is a prank, not a terribly creative one and it’s a distraction. Look you know you’ve got the Republicans who are playing games with the debt limit, you’ve got a Supreme Court Justice whose refusing to recuse himself despite conflicts of interests, you have health care act that is under siege you know this is this is a distraction. —Anthony Weiner
A crotch-shot of male briefed genitals was sent from Congressman’s Anthony Weiner’s twitter account to a young college girl. The congressman said it was a prank. How would he know that…unless…
Furthermore, how does a bulging briefed crotch-shot of male sex organs tweeted from Rep. Anthony Weiner’s twitter account become a Republican problem?
Weiner thinks that it is. He and some are suggesting that Congressman Weiner’s twitter account was hacked and the crotch-shot was sent to distract Congress from doing the work of the people. They're alleging a vast rightwing conspiracy or Republican schoolboys prank no doubt.
In spite of Democrat allegations here’s what we know. Rep. Weiner is conceding that the picture of male genitals was on his account or computer. Rep. Weiner is conceding that the picture of male genitals was in fact sent from his account. In addition, Congressman Weiner’s explanation is that his account was hacked and the picture was sent as a prank.
According to Weiner, we can all move on there’s nothing to see here. Further the congressman wants our attention focused on Republicans not his twitter tweeting pranks habits. (see 3:20min video)
I was hacked it happens to people, you move on. This is a prank, not a terribly creative one and it’s a distraction. Look you know you’ve got the Republicans who are playing games with the debt limit, you’ve got a Supreme Court Justice whose refusing to recuse himself despite conflicts of interests, you have health care act that is under siege you know this is this is a distraction.—Anthony Weiner
If the congressman was hacked by Conservatives of the vast right-wing conspiracy, why doesn’t he call the Capitol Police or the FBI? According to Breitbart.tv CNN's John King asks a great question: "There's one way the congressman could try to put this to rest, and that would be to call the Capitol Police or call the FBI and say, ‘please launch an investigation because I was hacked.' Why hasn't he done that?"
According to CNN’s Dana Bash, Rep. Weiner's office did not respond to that question but informed CNN that the congressman instead has hired a lawyer. (see 1:24min video)
CNN's Dana Bash reports on the latest developments involving the lewd photo sent out on Rep. Anthony Weiner's Twitter account to a young college girl in the Seattle area. She says despite the congressman's claim that his account hand been "hacked" neither the Capitol Police nor the FBI are currently investigating a hacking. Bash says that Weiner's office is "loathe" to treat the episode as anything more than a "prank".
Just so we all understand. a crouch shot of male genitals was sent from Congressman’s Anthony Weiner’s twitter account to a young college girl in Seattle and the best that congressman can claim is that his twitter account was hacked and this was just a prank . so let’s all just move on and focus on the real sexual perverts …the Republicans.
Oh, I get it, to Weiner this whole sorted incident is all like O.J. Simpson looking for the “real killer(s)”
He’s done it before. In the 2008 American presidential elections, Sen. Barry Hussein Soetoro illegally raised staggering unprecedented amounts of money over the internet for his presidential campaign. He did this because the F.E.C. did not do its job insuring the integrity of the federal elections. Soetoro raised thousands of dollars in foreign money with absolutely no accountability to the F.E.C. (source)
In his recent trip through Ireland, England and Poland the president is revisiting the technique that filled his election coffins with foreign money last election with his second, “people of the world” campaign tour. Foreign moneys will once again improperly influence the U.S. elections. Remember Obama has promised to raise one billion dollars for his reelection campaign. Where is he going to get that kind of money in a down U.S. economy? The answer to that question is why the president was in Europe this past week. (see 2:34min video)
Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugged reported for the 2008 elections that foreign money was influencing our 2008 elections and nothing was being done about it. Other overseas contributors are making multiple small donations ostensibly in their own names over a period of a few days, some under maximum donation allowances, but others aggregating in excess of the maximums when all added up. So while some of the contributions appear legal, others appear clearly over the maximums allowed without greater reporting requirement. (source)
President Barry Hussein Soetoro is not going to get a billion dollars out of the U.S. people, however because there has been no punishment for his past violations of campaign laws. And no regulations have been put in place to prevent a reoccurrence of the 2008 violation of U.S. election laws, with regards to internet fundraising, Obama will use the internet once again to skirt past U.S. election laws right before our very eyes.
That is why the president was in Europe last week. He was once again passively but illegally encouraging foreign influence in the 2012 American elections as he did in 2008. Moreover, as in 2008 there is no controlling legal authority that is going to stop him. The Federal Elections Commission isn’t going to do it. They failed to do it in 2008 and they refuse to do it now.
Just one more instance of what a lawless nation that America has become under the presidency of Barry Hussein Soetoro. Americans are out of work and this president extravagantly is planning to spend a billion dollars to be reelected most of which will be illegally obtained through foreign donations to his campaign by untraceable internet donations.
If you thought, it strange that the president of the United States in the middle of campaigning would schedule a European trip it was strange. Nevertheless, there’s a good reason for it. It’s the Foreign Donations Stupid.
Jon Stewart has done Americans a disservice. In a May 19, 2011 interview with Environmental Protection Agency head Lisa P. Jackson Stewart painted a smiley face on the environmental crusader who is in charge of imposing left-wing global warming beliefs on Americans though regulation. Only thing is Stewart presented what seemed to be a harmless reasonable Lisa Jackson.(see 6:19min video)
The truth is Ms. Jackson is a global warming fanatic who makes statements as , “I believe” or “That’s how I interpret“ and based on her beliefs and her interpretations she intends to mandate climate change regulations on Americans. If the founding fathers intended separation of church and state they certainty intend the belief in the religion of global warming to be separated from government also.
However like any religious zealot no amount of reason or scientific proof to the contrary is able to dissuade Ms. Jackson from her blind allegiance to her cause of converting all America to her beliefs and her mission to impose her belief system on Americans by law.
In the follow clips see how Ms. Jackson disregards facts that disprove her beliefs. When confront with facts like there has not been any global warm since 1998 Ms. Jackson ‘s eyes roll and she regurgitates her mind numbing cult induced belief that in spite of the proof that there has not been any scientific proof of the global warming since 1998 she still professes her belief in anthropogenic global warming. (see 31sec video)
(see 4:00mins video) part 1
(see3:51mins video) part 2
(see5:20mins video) part 3
(see4:02mins video) part 4
When faced with evidence that the White house holds the science suspect Ms. Jackson is unperturbed in her belief of Global warming. (see6:35min video)
With everything negative said about president Bush’s war efforts, president Bush has been vindicated in every way. First, he has been vindicated by the find of 550 metric tons of "yellowcake" in Iraq. Second, he has been substantiated by the actions of his predecessor Barry Hussein Soetoro. President Soetoro was one of the voices that attacked president Bush. President Soetoro promised to end the war in Iraq and bring troops home when elected. Actually, president Soetoro continued the Iraq war, he has escalated the Afghanistan war and he has started a war with Libya.
It’s exasperating because of Democrat’s destructive partisanship gamesmanship. At the detriment of the American people, Democrats continue to play with America’s security concerns.
How can one forget the incessant hounding that President Bush received because no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq? That is until July 5 2008.
AP News reported July 5 2008 The removal of 550 metric tons of "yellowcake" — the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment — was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam's nuclear legacy. It also brought relief to U.S. and Iraqi authorities who had worried the cache would reach insurgents or smugglers crossing to Iran to aid its nuclear ambitions. Iraq has no nuclear power plants so the only possible reason for having 500 metric tons of “yellowcake” was for WMD’s.
Did the Obama media report this? Not in any discernable way which made the connection between this material being found in Iraq and president Bush’s claim that Saddam Hussein was gathering material for WMDs. The myth still persists that there were no WMDs found in Iraq. This was clearly not the case. (see story)
I have to say that my greatest disappointment with Democrat partisans is how they played around with American’s security while at the same time attempting to discredit president Bush on the war. Democrat partisans called the Iraq war, “Bush’s war” even though the president went to Congress in strict compliance of the war powers act. In both Afghanistan and Iraq president Bush sought after and obtained congressional approval to engage in war activities. (see Afghanistan Congressional Authorization and in the Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq)
What is so amazing is Sen. Barry Hussein Soetoro was so concerned that president Bush would use the Iraq Resolution to attack Iran that Sen. Soetoro sponsored a bill to prevent such an occurrence. (see below)
Whereas any offensive military action taken by the United States against Iran must be explicitly authorized by Congress: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That nothing in the Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq (Public Law 107-243), any act that serves as the statutory authority for Executive Order 13382 or Executive Order 13224, any resolution previously adopted, or any other provision of law including the terms of Executive Order 13382 or Executive Order 13224 shall be construed to authorize, encourage, or in any way address the use of the Armed Forces of the United States against Iran. Sponsor Sen. Barack Hussein Obama
If the president understands that congress must be consulted before acts of war as demonstrated by his “View Clarifying that the use of Force against Iran” then why has he not consulted congress with his military action in Libya (see here and here)
Thus one can only conclude that based on president Soetoro actions as a Senator, where he sponsored a bill to force president Bush to comply strictly within the war powers act, the president is well aware that he is in violation of the wars power act and is purposely attempting to flaunt the law.
There can be no question that president Soetoro is willfully acting lawlessly regarding his illegal Libyan war. Something that president Bush did not do in any conflict, which he was engaged although Democrats falsely accused him of starting an illegal war.
From coast to coast, the GOP is engaged in what appears to be a coordinated, expensive effort to block voters from the polls.--Donna Brazile
Only an irresponsible Black political pundit or a Democrat would make the scurrilous claims Donna Brazile consistently makes against Republicans and still expects to be taken seriously.
Brazile’s latest rave against the GOP is code for her hate of White people. Hate rapped insidiously in a charge that White people are attempting to suppress the Black vote. If Brazile and the first Black president Barry Hussein Soetoro had, their way there would be an all out race war in America instead of the 2012 elections. (see source article)
The truth is Democrats have been fermenting racial hatred since they selected Barry Hussein Soetoro as their candidate. In addition, the president has participated in divisive volatile and racial tainted rhetoric throughout his presidency. Barry Hussein Soetoro has done more to divide America than any president in the history of this country.
It is time that Liberals and Democrats cease and desist with the race baiting. Ms. Brazile should be called out on her racist comments, as any White person would be.
When Barry Hussein Soetoro losses in 2012 it won’t be because he’s Black, it will be because he and the Liberal Democrat establishment tried to use their own Racism as high ground as they took Racist sniper shots at White people in this country while pretending to be victims of Racism at the hands of the White man.
The truth is president Soetoro will discover that one can’t hate on White people or any people and expect them to vote you back into power. That tactic worked in 2008 as a result of White guilt. Whites were guilted into voting for the first Black president though he wasn’t qualified. But now that there is a blatant record of distain for White people from Soetoro and his supporters, Soetoro is not going to get a free affirmative action pass just because he’s Black this time around! Not to mention that his anti-American failed Progressive Liberal agenda has been exposed.
Donna Brazile is a Racist who plays the Race card. She is the worst possible Racist she projects her own Racism on others. It seems that Democrats are doing the same these days, which is behavior that is simply outrageous.
“[Obama is a] black mascot of Wall Street oligarchs and a black puppet of corporate plutocrats. And now he has become head of the American killing machine and is proud of it.” —Professor Cornell West
Is the president ‘a Black Mascot’ and ‘a Black Puppet’ and is he a sell out to the killing machine because he killed Osama bin Laden? In addition, are those charges, in fact, racist charges?
These are the charges leveled at the president by Cornel West, a Princeton University professor and leading black intellectual. Dr. West is harshly criticizing President Obama, a candidate he once supported but now calls “a black mascot” and “a black puppet” in a recent interview with truthdig.com (see source)
With the Obama, media turning over every rock and looking beneath every shrub for Racism 1 would think they would race to pick the low hanging fruit that professor West offers. And they will eventually. (see story)
Had a White person remotely hinted that the president was simply the black face for Wall Street, Corporate America and the Western Industrialized Military Complex, a 24-hour news barrage equaling the combined forces of hurricanes Rita, Katrina and the tsunami that recently destroyed part of Japan would hound him or her.
That White person would have been swept away on a tidal wave of oblivion. A tidal wave which career and reputation would be spewed out over vast fouled beaches of unemployment.
Alas, Professor West is a Black man. So as Black on Black crime has historically been overlooked in America, the media will not report on a Black man calling another Black man the N-word or calling him a Sell-out or calling him an Uncle Tom or any of the pejoratives that are usually reserved for inter-racial confrontations. Professor West’s complaints will go largely unnoticed by the Brian Williams Katie Couric News media that made the Affirmative Action first Black president possible.
Professor West’s grievance is largely that Barry Hussein Soetoro is a sell-out and Uncle Tom to the people who voted for him. Professor West says that he will neither vote for Soetoro in 2012 nor will he recommend that anyone vote for Soetoro. Dr. West believes Soetoro has become a trader to his self-avowed race.
“And even at this moment, when the empire is in deep decline, the culture is in deep decay, the political system is broken, where nearly everyone is up for sale, you say all I have is the subversive memory of those who came before, personal integrity, trying to live a decent life, and a willingness to live and die for the love of folk who are catching hell. This means civil disobedience, going to jail, supporting progressive forums of social unrest if they in fact awaken the conscience, whatever conscience is left, of the nation. And that’s where I find myself now.”—Professor Cornell West
According to professor West president, Soetoro has betrayed his race and his progressive liberal ideology for the power of the White man.
“I was thinking maybe he has at least some progressive populist instincts that could become more manifest after the cautious policies of being a senator and working with [Sen. Joe] Lieberman as his mentor,” he says. “But it became very clear when I looked at the neoliberal economic team. The first announcement of Summers and Geithner I went ballistic. I said, ‘Oh, my God, I have really been misled at a very deep level.’”—Professor Cornell West
To Dr. West Barry Hussein Soetoro has a Machiavellian tendency, which over-rides any sense of decency, loyalty, courtesy and respect for any other cause or persons than that of gaining power for himself.
“What it said to me on a personal level was that brother Barack Obama had no sense of gratitude, no sense of loyalty, no sense of even courtesy, [no] sense of decency, just to say thank you. Is this the kind of manipulative, Machiavellian orientation we ought to get used to? That was on a personal level.”—Professor Cornell West
Dr. West also believes that president Soetoro is perpetrating on his claim that he is a Black man. According to Dr. West president Soetoro is afraid of real Black men similar to his grandmother who the president once said was afraid of Black men.
“I think my dear brother Barack Obama has a certain fear of free black men,” West says. “It’s understandable. As a young brother who grows up in a white context, brilliant African father, he’s always had to fear being a white man with black skin. All he has known culturally is white. He is just as human as I am, but that is his cultural formation. When he meets an independent black brother, it is frightening. And that’s true for a white brother. When you get a white brother who meets a free, independent black man, they got to be mature to really embrace fully what the brother is saying to them. It’s a tension, given the history. It can be overcome. Obama, coming out of Kansas influence, white, loving grandparents, coming out of Hawaii and Indonesia, when he meets these independent black folk who have a history of slavery, Jim Crow, Jane Crow and so on, he is very apprehensive. He has a certain rootlessness, a deracination. It is understandable.—Professor Cornell West
Professor West is so distraught by the president’s fake Black populism that he does the unimaginable and praises the Tea Party for pointing out that the government under Soetoro is corrupt. Conversely one senses that professor West blames the government for corrupting the president as he comes to gasp with Soetoro own corruption.
The tea party folk are right when they say the government is corrupt. It is corrupt. Big business and banks have taken over government and corrupted it in deep ways.—Professor Cornell West
Finally, Dr. West sees Barry Hussein Soetoro as he is not as he projects himself to be. For seeing, this and attempting to warn others Professor Cornell West will pay an exacting toll. Just as any Republican would when the Obama Media sets out to destroy them Dr. West will be set upon by the Obama media and then relegated to the enemies list that heretofore was reserved for Obama political foes.
“We have got to attempt to tell the truth, and that truth is painful,” he says. “It is a truth that is against the thick lies of the mainstream. In telling that truth we become so maladjusted to the prevailing injustice that the Democratic Party, more and more, is not just milquetoast and spineless, as it was before, but thoroughly complicitous with some of the worst things in the American empire. I don’t think in good conscience I could tell anybody to vote for Obama.—Professor Cornell West
The truth is president Barry Hussein Soetoro’s self-styled form of democracy is counter to the Constitutional Republic that is America. That is what Professor West has learned and that is what the professor is attempting to warn America about.
God save professor West. He’s going to need God’s protection from what lies ahead at the hands of Democrats.
I’m kinda happy that gas prices are going up in one sense. It’ll force us into thinking about changing the culture, to create more emphasis on mass transportation from the local on up to the federal level —Obama supporter Kaukauna, Wisconsin
The president should campaign on high gas prices. Liberals and Democrats are happy that gas is $4 a gallon because they want “investments” in alternative energy solutions, or so they have been saying. Even president Barry Hussein Soetoro has said it. So why doesn’t the president just go all in on high energy prices and claim them as a good thing for America? (see 2:12min video)
Well we all know that the president didn’t end the Iraq war in fact he escalated the Afghanistan war and started a new conflict in Libya and perhaps that why he hasn’t started his plans for low cost alternative energy.
Either that or the fact that Liberals have been a little inconsistent on high gases prices if you remember under Bush high gas prices were ruinous to the country but under president Barry Hussein Soetoro high gas prices are a blessing.
Don Smith walks us though the hypocrisy over gas prices that Democrats have displayed through the Bush years up until now. (see 4:20min video)
The point here is Liberals can’t seem to make up their minds whether high gas prices are good or are bad. I think it has something to do with what ideology is in control of this country. If Liberals are in control Liberals tend to think high gas prices are a good thing. If Conservatives are in control Liberals tend to think high gas prices are a bad thing.
I’m being to think that Liberals really aren’t making a lot of sense on the subject of energy. After all most of the Liberal’s emphasis for green energy and alternative fuels is based in the debunked theory of anthropogenic global warming, the belief that man-made carbons are polluting the atmosphere thereby trapping heat in the atmosphere and causing unprecedented rises in earth’s temperature.
Ergo a false premise can only lead to false solutions. Which leads to false claims,which leads to false policy and which leads to general confused Liberals as they discuss high gas prices. (see 2:10min video)
And then there is the out right biased reporting of the media. High gas prices bad under president Bush. High gas prices not mentioned under president Barry Hussein Soetoro. (see 3:47min video
Make one wonder do Liberal secretly what this country to fail?
I think that there are discussions even about transparency and developing rules about transparency that we need to be able to have quietly and behind closed doors–Daniel Gordon
WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, and IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH—1984
"I will also hold myself, as president, to a new standard of openness." - President Barry Hussein Soetoro
We already know that Closing Guantanamo Bay prison is keeping Guantanamo Bay prison open, to president Barry Hussein Soetoro. We also know that Ending the war in Iraq is continuing the war in Iraq, escalating the war in Afghanistan and staring a war with Libya to the president. Therefore, it is of little surprise that Transparency is Opaqueness to the president. (see 2:36min video)
The president is preparing to sign an executive order that would give the federal government the power to punish or reward government contractors based on which Party and what causes that they support. Nevertheless, what the president is calling this executive order is transparency or disclosure of political spending by government contractors. (see Executive Draft)
Like everything with Democrats what is—is not really, what it seems. There is always an underlying and insidious motive the, “we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.” Sure Democrats say that an executive order the president is floating is about transparency but there is this history with Democrats, which establishes that this executive order is more about political favoritism rather than transparency. (see articles here and here)
Following Congressman Darrell Issa’s oversight committee attempts to address the reality that the president’s proposed executive order would produce. (see 6:14min video)
With the blatant politicizing of everything the Barry Hussein Soetoro administration leaves very little room for trust. There is a warranted and healthly mistrusted of the Soetoro administration concerning this Executive Order. There is also a mistrust of the entire Soetoro agenda.
Dog-whistle politics, also known as the use of code words, is a term for a type of political campaigning or speechmaking which employs coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different or more specific meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience. The term is invariably pejorative, and is used to refer both to messages with an intentional subtext, and those where the existence or intent of a secondary meaning is disputed. The term is an analogy to dog whistles, which are built in such a way that the high-frequency whistle is heard by dogs, but appears silent to human hearing. --Wikipedia
Dog-whistle or code words are words that only an exclusive group of people understands. Liberals police speech by labeling words hate speech and then they doggedly sniff out every sentence phrase and paragraph in politics, hounding out any perceived or so-called vestige of racist rhetoric in the public sector that Republicans might use.
For instance, this recent “Meet the Press” interview Newt Gingrich made the point that Barry Hussein Soetoro policies are responsible for putting unprecedented numbers of Americans on food stamps. Liberal show host Dave Gregory’s response? Food stamps? Why that’s a racist code word. (see 1:13min video)
Mr. Gingrich is absolutely correct the bizarre desire of Liberals to twist and contort every word, sentence, phrase or paragraph into a racist epithet is outrageously preposterous.
Since Barry Hussein Soetoro has been president every criticism no matter how true or how warranted is consider racist by Soetoro defenders.
Like the, “It’s Bush’s fault” card the “Racism” card is over played. Whenever it is heard, Republicans have permission to disregard it in the same manner as Mr. Gingrich did. And please, plenty of righteous indignation is warranted!
Here’s some fun. We all know how the president loves to blame that “other administration” for all of his troubles. He’s probably has underlined and in red in this campaign playbook if all else faults blame Bush!
Nevertheless, what if he changes that to a little end zone dancing and spiking of the football? What if Soetoro changes blaming Bush with touting that he was the president that did what Bush couldn’t do? Moreover, what if president Soetoro replaced his Bush blame rhetoric with, “I killed Osama bin Laden, “in every campaign speech?
Fortunately, SNL gives us a look at what that might look like. (see 5:03min video)
Hilarious! Not much of a president but a hell of a campaigner and a namedropper.
Go Obama killed Osama, go Obama killed Osama!
I’m thinking had Bush did this he would have received international rebuke as a unilateral cowboy and war criminal. They would be calling for his trial at the World Court at the Hague and would be attempting to arrest him on sight and frog march him directly to the Hague. The Media would have bombarded Bush with questions whether its legal to assassinate a world figure criminal or not. They’d be after Dick Chaney too.
I guess Obama wouldn’t get that type of hate because he’s black. That kind of hate is only reserved for the White man.
Mexicans leaving Mexico for a better life in another country speaks to a problem in Mexico not the United States of America. Are U.S. politicians to stupid to understand this?
Just in one speech president, Barry Hussein Soetoro revealed his utter lack of lawfulness and truth. He mis-quoted scripture, he mis-applied legal immigration of Ellis and Angel Islands and he mis-represented civil rights movement to justify something that is wrong.
The children of Israel fled from the cruel slavery of Egypt they didn’t invade Egypt. Immigrants enter the United States legally not illegally. Black Slavery and subsequent civil rights fights had to do will people who were brought to the United States against their will. These people’s language, culture and humanity were stripped away from them in over 400 years of chattel slavery and Jim Crow discrimination.
In contrast, the illegal entry invasion that the president is attempting to promote, the illegal entry invasion of over 40 million Mexican national into the United States of America has absolutely nothing to do with anything in the history of the bible or the history of the United States of America.
However, to the twisted mind of Barry Hussein Soetoro it’s all the same thing. It is not. (see 3:37 min video)
That very thing, the Illegal Entry Invasion into the United States of America by Mexican Nations has devastated U.S. economy as a plague of locust devastates croplands causing blight. The influx of 40 million plus like swarming hordes has devoured our healthcare system, destroyed U.S. education and crash the U.S. job market. The president might as well be arguing for the metastasis of cancer or the proliferation of AIDS as natural body functions. Although cancer and AIDS do occur naturally and have a history with the human species, no one is going to welcome the death and devastation they cause to the body.
A more productive discussion would be what the United States could do to stabilize the country of Mexico. How can we take advantage of it’s resources and help it’s people build up a self sustaining economy that will employ it’s own people. We should have had these discussion years ago but it’s not too late to begin now.
We should be working to strengthen Mexico to become a partner in the 21-century global economy rather than the pedantic weak sister it has become. Mexico sends it’s children to the United States while it engages in activities not worthy of being considered a country. Drug cartels, puerile and corrupt government and the encouraging of millions of it’s citizens to invade another country, the U.S. A. These are not activities befitting an ally of the United States of America. Yet they are permitted to go on while we argue the wrong arguments about what to do to reform our policies when it’s the government of Mexico that is broken.
For the president of the United States to defend Mexico by advocating that we make duel citizens of Mexicans who then would able to vote in U.S. elects and their own country’s elections is sheer madness.
Is anyone looking at what Mexicans have done to their own country? Do we want them voting in our elections when it is obvious that they don’t know how to vote for the best leaders for their own country. Take a look at California. Illegal Mexican National voting abounds in that state. California is but an example of what Comprehensive Immigration Reform will do. It is the illegal voting in California that is making it’s government a dysfunction mirror reflection of Mexico’s government.
We don’t need to reform the United States to handle Mexico’s problems as we are attempting to do. We need to reform Mexico to handle it’s own problems.
That starts with saying no to “The Dream Act,” no to “Comprehensive Immigration Reform,” and no to non-enforcement of our borders and non-enforcement of our deportation laws.
Our president is demanding that we become even more of an enabler to a country that is a junkie hooked on drugs and corruption. Mexico needs an intervention not a clean needle program of taking in its citizens while Mexico continues it’s cocaine induced beheadings, murders and government corruption.
We need Comprehensive Country of Mexico Reform. Mexicans leaving Mexico for a better life in another country speaks to a problem in Mexico not the United States of America. Are U.S. politicians to stupid to understand this?
He’s Vice president of the United States but according to al Qaeda he’s non-essential. Found in the late Osama bin Laden’s diaries was bin Laden’s posthumous note that it wouldn’t be worth al Qaeda’s trouble to kill the Vice president.
Bin Laden did have the president as a “top target” along with any of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Secretary of Defense.
Bin Laden noted that the vice president is not an important enough target. Biden was never mentioned by name only the designated office of the Vice presidency was. Bin Laden reason? It is because of Vice presidency’s constitutional weakness. (http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyharnden/100087782/osama-bin-laden-to-al-qaeda-dont-bother-assassinating-joe-biden/>see source) (see 4:52 min video)
So does this mean that when non-essential government workers are furloughed Mr. Biden has to stay home without pay?
What is the one where we send the whole Soetoro administration home without pay… that’s right that’s called the 2012 elections. I can’t wait to make president Soetoro a former non-essential government employee before he fundamentally makes this the country formerly known as the United States of America.
Last week we were asked to meet with president Obama. There are about ten of us who are considered influential in the media, in hopes to reframe the immigration argument, or the immigration “conversation.”
And we were…it was like a brainstorming room, Emilio was there, and it was very beneficial to know what is happening and what are the roadblocks that he has been facing and how can we help. And how can we be the messengers of what is being done and what is not being done —Eva Longoria
You probably didn’t know that violating the United States Constitution could be so sexy. Yes, who knew that all you have to do to make “Illegal” the new Legal is brainstorm with the president about how to talk differently about 40 million Mexican nations and their children living, working and receiving free education and healthcare illegally in this country.
How it’s done? Just put a beautiful media pop-culture icon as the face of your cause, target American politicians as “enemies” who oppose your cause and speak about the reality of your illegality as if it were something complete different from what it is.
That is what Desperate Housewife star Eva Longoria said she is doing to advance the cause of the Mexican National invaders that are in the United States. And she is doing it for the 2012 elections. Longoria believes that rewarding 40 million Mexican Nationals, who left their country to enter the United States illegally, with citizenship if spoken with the right words isn’t so bad. One could use the right words and make an “argument “a “conversation” and make illegally living in the United States, “Citizenship.”
In fact if one says it just right, the American people are too stupid to know that the term “Comprehensive Immigration Reform” is the new sexy for Mexican Nationals illegally entering the U.S., living in the U.S., working in the U.S., getting free education and healthcare in the U.S. and voting in American elections. (see 2:21min video)
It’s going to be a long process , we have to hold accountable many people of Congress and hopefully in 2012…hopefully the Dream Act will come up before 2012. And those who do not support Comprehensive Immigration Reform will hopefully pay for it in those elections. And that is what we’re hoping to do is aggregate the Latino audience to come out and make their voices known of what they want, to see an immigration reform.—Eva Longoria
Longoria said that president Barry Hussein Soetoro is all ears for this new plan of sexing up the Illegal Alien argument for the 2012 election. She believes that the Latino community feels that it should be given something for electing Soetoro in 2008. So why not make Mexican Nationals U.S. citizens. When you think about it, all that Mexican nationals have really done is broken the U.S. laws and violated the sovereignty of the United States and isn’t that sexy?
"We have gone above and beyond what was requested by the very Republicans who said they supported broader reform as long as we got serious about enforcement. But even though we've answered these concerns, I gotta say I suspect there are still going to be some who are trying to move the goal posts on us one more time.
"Maybe they'll need a moat. Maybe they'll want alligators in the moat." —president Barry Hussein Soetoro
In some of the most explosively divisive political rhetoric since referring to Republicans as enemies, Barry Hussein Soetoro campaigned in El Paso Texas yesterday painting Republicans as unreasonable fearful xenophobes. The president called for a complete refutation of the Constitution calling such a negation of the constitution by its code name, Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CIR). (see story)(see: 57sec. video)
The Democrat policy of CIR as promoted by president Soetoro is intended to secure the Hispanic vote for Democrats but it also will forever change the social and economic make up of the United States of America into that of a third world nation. Such “Reform” would ensconce Progressive Liberals of the Democrat Party as rulers of this new inferior nation, which Comprehensive immigration Reform would create.
The president flippantly chided Republicans and once again intimated that they are “enemies” of Mexicans. All the while, he failed to mention that Mexicans are illegally in this country. Instead, he vilified Republicans because they like any other people in all other countries of the world value the citizenship of their own country, the United States of America.
Preposterously the president falsely charged that Democrats have made the necessary border protections that would warrant the government giving Mexican nations undeserved United States citizenship. The truth is there is a report produced by Homeland Security entitled: Customs and Border Protection’s Implementation shows that the Soetoro administration is not protecting or enforcing America’s borders as president Soetoro claimed. (see report below)
In spite of the CIR report president Soetoro was in full campaign mode in the border state of Texas yesterday when he denounced Republicans in a strict partisan attack. Just days after calling for national unity after the killing of al Qaeda mastermind and leader Osama bin Laden the president set Party relations back one hundred years with his bitter political strike against Republicans.
Let’s be perfectly clear this president is a strict partisan divider whose policies are not intentionally meant to do well for the country at large. This president is agenda driven and is attempting to fundamentally change this country.
Granting amnesty to 40 million illegal aliens in the name of comprehensive immigration reform would in fact change this country and not for the better.
Just another reason in a long list that Barry Hussein Soetoro must be defeated in 2012.
We all must learn that confronting evil can lead to violence. Just a little intellectual dishonesty and some unprincipled sniffling we can put an end to Islamic slanders peacefully by eliminating their cause…our freedom. —Andrew Klavan
Andrew Klavan’s powerful satirical look entitled, How to behave during an Islamic Massacre” says in three minutes all one needs to know about how destructive to reasoning and meaning political correctness is in and to our culture. Klavan’s skillfully worded critique exposes the left’s moral relativism as the purveyor of true ignorance not the enlightened chariot of knowledge that it thinks itself to be. (see 3:16min video)
Though Klavan’s aide one sees clearly that on every given subject how the Left’s thinking has corrupted our entire culture. Thus devolving a once noble and civilized society into an unprincipled tatted and pierced sagging pant bohemian sex fixated IPhone and Game Boy 360 under-culture which is dominated by Progressive Political and Corporate overlords who track you, stack you and pack you into little neat voting and consumer cubbyholes.
You shall not covet your neighbor's house, you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is your neighbor's. —AKJV Exodus 20:17
The more I listen to president Barry Hussein Soetoro the more I am convinced that he believes that he is a Jedi Warrior. Really, I’m serious. I’m further persuaded that the president believes that he has only to play speech mind tricks on the American people such as , “You want to pay higher taxes,” that of course was the underlying message that president Soetoro is advancing on the American people.
The president believes the American people will be weak minded enough to commend him for his speech while we reach into our collective wallets and pay for the Democrat Nanny State which he envisions. He believes we were mesmerized by his anti-Reaganesque call to tax and spend.
Instead of Reagan’s lofty shining city on a hill, Soetoro’s vision for America is Sodom and Gomorrah in the valley of tax, debt and entitlement financial ruin. The president seems to believe that he only has to speak it out to the universe and Americans will give him whatever amount of our hard-earned money that he demands.
If Jedi mind tricks only work on the weak-minded Soetoro speech was a Jedi mind trick. (see 43:23min video)
The president and his Liberal counterparts are probably not particularly familiar with the Ten Commandments since they have made it their goal to remove them from every public institution in America. However, the 10th commandment is particularly interesting because it runs counter to the president’s desired way of funding his vision. The president and Progressive Liberal Democrats plan to covet our neighbor’s houses, his oxen, his assets and his money. Of course, the president calls our neighbors, “the rich” so that it makes it easier in his mind to covet their property.
The president’s vision for America is one of coveting of our neighbor’s money by propagating class warfare, thereby inciting hatred for so-called “rich” Americans. That is a violation of the constitution and the 10th commandment as well. The president’s vision of America is immoral repugnant and un-American.
These shared Progressive Democrat values are the reasons why Progressives Liberal s and Democrats gave the president high marks on his speech , but these values are exactly what separates Progressives from God and the majority of Americans.
A hooded and wired Iraqi prisoner at Abu Ghraib prison was allegedly told he would be electrocuted if he fell off a box
We are not a better country if we pretend that we are prepared to pay those prices but hypocritically below the radar we actually do all of these things because we want to have our cake and eat it too. That’s the position that we are in now! –Alan Dershowitz
Wasn’t Sen. Obama against President Bush’s policies on “the war on terror” and enhanced interrogation techniques before, as President, he was for them and began to use those policies himself?
By no means, I’m I condemning the decisions and actions that led to the death of Osama bin Laden. What I am is shocked. I’m shocked at the blatant hypocrisy of the Liberal Left. The Left excoriated president George W. Bush starting at the war on terror and going through to the Abu Ghraib prison photographs that showed the sophomoric antics of a few military prison guards engaged in largely fake torture scenarios meant to demean their terrorist captives more than anything else.
What ensued was a national, no a world outcry against a perceived wrong doing by the United States in general and against president Bush and vice president Cheney in particular.
Sen. Barry Hussein Soetoro used both the war on terror and the topic of torture to denounce U.S. policy. As well, he vowed that as president he would not use such tactics because those type of tactics are against the morals of America.
As president, Soetoro did again denounce torture and he signed an Executive order to close Guantanamo Bay (which never happened) to give an impression that he was morally superior to the previous administration. (see 1:34min video)
The total hypocrisy is that, as president, everything president Soetoro denounced as morally inferior policy of the Bush administration; the torture, the wars and the warrantless wiretaps are being done by president Soetoro or he is directly benefiting from them. Ironically everything that president Soetoro told the American people we should not be doing because, he said, they are not representative of the American way, he is presently doing.
As President Obama celebrates the signature national-security success of his tenure, he has a long list of people to thank. On the list: George W. Bush.
[A]detention and interrogation system that Obama once condemned as contrary to American values produced one early lead that, years later, brought U.S. forces to the high-walled compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, and a fatal encounter with an unarmed Osama bin Laden.-- Scott Wilson and Anne E. Kornblut (source)
This is in total contradiction of everything that Barry Hussein Soetoro claims he believes in, yet the capture of Osama bin Laden was the result of all of George W. Bush’s policies, which contradictorily president Soetoro adopted when he became president. What this does is it confirms that everything that Mr. Soetoro did prior to him assuming the presidency was purely partisan and destructive to the country. Somebody owes president Bush a great big apology. No president Soetoro owes president Bush a great big apology. (see 3:58min video)
And we have to pay the consequences, and the consequences mean that we do not capture Osama bin laden and we do not prevent certain preventable acts of terrorism. If we are prepared to pay those prices then we are a better country.
We are not a better country if we pretend that we are prepared to pay those prices but hypocritically below the radar we actually do all of these things because we want to have our cake and eat it too. That’s the position that we are in now!
We say that we are against torture, we would torture if we had the nine, ten hypothetical that Congressman King set out. We did use the information we elicited from waterboarding, we continue to wiretap without warrant and we shot a man in cold blood without giving him an opportunity to surrender and we all think that that was terrific.
Let’s face reality we’re a bunch of hypocrites. And that’s probably necessary when you live in a real world with terrible people. You want to comply with the highest standards but you also want to achieve the ends, you can’t do that—Alan Dershowitz
As Alan Dershowitz said the Barry Hussein Soetoro administration used information gotten from torture to find and kill bin Laden. The Soetoro administration still uses warrantless wiretapping and according to Mr. Dershowitz. It is possible that the Soetoro administration shot Osama bin Laden in cold blood according to Dershowitz. Osama bin Laden was shot to save the administration the embarrassment of placing bin Laden in the Obama and Holder U.S. Justice system. They just recently discovered that our Justice system is not equipped to handle war criminals the caliber of bin Laden.
As a candidate for president, Barack Obama offered himself as a clear alternative to Bush-era anti-terrorism policies. Governing has proven muddier. Yesterday, President Obama announced that he will revamp, rather than reject, the system of military tribunals that President George W. Bush created to try terrorism suspects.-- Michael D. Shear and Peter Finn (source)
Yes Mr. Dershowitz, I couldn’t have said it any better myself, you Progressive Liberals types are a bunch of hypocrites.
Whose I.Q. is higher Al Gore’s, John Kerry’s, George W. Bush or Barry Hussein Soetoro?
You’d probably be surprised that “W” is not the low man in this grouping. According to sources president Bush may only be surpassed by one name on this list, care to guess who?
If you guessed the former vice-president Al Gore you may be correct, but not so fast. Though Gore had an incredible hyped-up image of being smart , image isn’t everything. According to his college records he was a below average student. John Kerry's I.Q. and academic achievements are reported to be less than president Bush's I.Q. and grades. And Kerry also attempted to project that he was always the smartest person in the room.
So it seems that George W. Bush was just as smart if not smarter than all of the above. (see stories here and here) I can hear your protest now, ‘Well what about president Soetoro, I know he’s smarter than Bush.” To which I ask you on what evidence do you base that speculation?
Out of the men mentioned only president Soetoro’s records from Kindergarten to when he was a Illinois State Senator are hidden and protected by court order. Because this is true we don’t know what Barry Hussein Soetoro’s legal name is, what his I.Q. is what his grades were or where (that’s right)where he was born. (I understand that he's released a third record purported to be his "birth certificate") All we know is what he has told us in the two autobiographies that he allegedly wrote. Besides that we are expected to take him at his word.
Why so secretive Mr. president?
That is why Jon Stewart is so brilliant. Without getting into the minutia Stewart makes a point that we can all understand. The president is hiding something.
Stewart shows the irony of a man who obviously dislikes America yet still wants to be America’s president. And simultaneously Stewart is able to show that president Soetoro has a problem of excessive secrecy. (see 4:03min video)
Many a truth is said in jest and look at all of the Soetoro problems that Stewart was able to point out with comedy.
Soetoro’s questionable but undeniable support of Islam coupled with anti-Jewish and anti-Christian sentiments – There goes the Christian and Jewish vote.
Soetoro’s failure to create or save jobs—There goes the middle class vote
Soetoro’s broken promises to end the Iraq war, his escalation of the Afghan war and his illegal and unconstitutional start of war with Libya.—There goes some of the code pink and conscientious anti-war vote
Soetoro’s faultfinding with America and our Constitution—There goes the loyal American vote
Soetoro’s unpopularity—There goes the fad, hey he’s Black vote
Soetoro’s blatant lie about transparency—There goes the women’s “you lied to me” vote
Speaking of transparency Stewart calls to our attention the soaring promises of candidate Soetoro compared and contrasted to the Fascist alike practices of president Soetoro.
The president blatant aversion to transparency leads one to think that perhaps something happened in his childhood that is the cause for his incessant need for public and private secrecy.
President Soetoro presently has the following records sealed from public view; kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, original passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, the original vault copy (OVC) of his birth records, and his adoption records. (Say it Loud, “I’m a Birther and I’m Proud)
Now that the president has released what is purported to be his long form Birth Certificate there is still so much we don't know about him.
As Tom Brokaw and Charlie Rose discussed prior to the Soetoro presidency October 30, 2008, and remain true, we know very little about Barry Hussein Soetoro. In spite of that, Mr. Soetoro is asking to be re-elected without giving you, the American people, a full accounting and disclosure of who he really is. (hear 37sec audio)
Your record shows that you will say anything to be elected Mr. president. So after two and a half years the American people see that what you say rarely matches up with reality Mr. president. Is there any wonder why the American people want to discuss the unnatural secretly, which surrounds your life.
Right now the American people don’t know anything about you. Not your I.Q. , how smart you are, if you are in good or ill health or what kind of student you were. Also why did it take you 2 1/2 years to show the American people what you knew they wanted to see even before the presidency? And why do you feel it's a victory for you when you where forced to show it.
We knew all of these things about all of our presidents until you. That’s just one of the conversations owed to the American people before you even think of and before there is any talk of re-election. If we don't have this conversation Mr. president you will not be re-elected.
That, Mr. president, should be one conversation you should be happy to have!
