Democrats Hate Americans: Call them Terrorists

Unfortunately, Obama cowered under his seat during the D.C. horror movie and now plans to try to hide behind his Supercommittee. But the Tea Party slashers roaming the corridors of the Capitol have feasted without resistance on delicious victims and will only grow bolder. —Maureen Dowd

Who are Tea Party members if not Americans? Then why do Democrats hate Americans and the Representatives that these Americans send to Congress?

Who could forget the day room scene in the movie, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest? A scene of pajama clad psychiatric patients in various stages of dementia or mental illness. We are witnessing the national expansion of the Cuckoo’s Nest mental institution day room as Progressive Liberals in both media and government lose all sense of reality based mental well-being because of their rabid hate of the Tea Parties or better yet their indirect odium waged at Conservatives as represented by Tea Parties.

Progressive Liberal revulsion of Conservatives is obviously the root from which these full-blown Progressive media and Progressive politicians launch their full-frontal attacks against Americans. These attacks are meant to demonize Liberal’s detested self-made enemies, Tea Party/Conservatives. With time, the over-the-top mischaracterizations of Tea Party-Americans have gone from simply outrageous to seriously delusional to extremely hallucinatory. (see 10:13 min video)



In the beginning, Tea Party-Americans were simply mischaracterized by Progressives as Tea Party crazies à la Christine O’Donnell and Sharron Angle.

More recently, however the mentally unstable Progressive Left has gone insanely mad in their concerted efforts to malign Tea Party-Americans by bombarding them with shock and awe language typically reserved for enemies of the United States not fellow Americans and political rivals.

One of the most extremely hallucinatory attacks on the Tea Party came from Maureen Dowd in a article she posted with the NYT called, “Washington Chainsaw Massacre” in this piece one has to wonder where in the mind of Dowd does fantasy end and reality begin. Obviously, she doesn’t think that Tea Party-Americans are the syfy monsters, which she conjures up from her mind of remembrance or does she?

They were like cannibals, eating their own party and leaders alive. They were like vampires, draining the country’s reputation, credit rating and compassion. They were like zombies, relentlessly and mindlessly coming back again and again to assault their unnerved victims, Boehner and President Obama. They were like the metallic beasts in “Alien” flashing mouths of teeth inside other mouths of teeth, bursting out of Boehner’s stomach every time he came to a bouquet of microphones. (Conjuring that last image on Monday, Vladimir Putin described America as “a parasite.”)—Maureen Dowd

Dowd’s disturbing images suggest someone who is devoid of all rational cognitive processes. Does she really think that Republicans who were sent to Washington in the 112th Congress to stop the multi-trillion dollars spending binge of president Barry Hussein Soetoro and the 110th and 111th Democrat Controlled Congresses are like SyFy monsters or are Dowd’s surreal and crazy imagines met to invoke visceral passions of her fellow Progressives? Does she really intend to push Liberal fanatics further toward delusionary mischaractizations, regarding Tea Party-Americans?

Yet Dowd is not alone. She and the rest of Progressive media have signed what seems to be a blood oath before Satan promising to attack collaboratively Tea-Party Americans as monsters, terrorist and hostage takers. For example:

Thomas Roberts, host of MSNBC’s “The ED Show,” 8/3/11:

“Democrats are very worried their leaders will buckle to political hostage-taking of the Republicans just like they did with the debt ceiling earlier.”

Rev. Al Sharpton, host of “MSNBC Live,” 8/2/11:

“The possibility of a disastrous default was held hostage to the extreme conservative ideology of choking the federal government.”

Dylan Ratigan, host of MSNBC’s “The Dylan Ratigan Show,” 8/2/11:

“We are, in many ways, forced to lead our show with the political, pro-wrestling shenanigans with the threat of a hostage crisis that could bring our country to the brink.”

Eugene Robinson, Washington Post columnist and MSNBC political analyst on MSNBC’s “Rachel Maddow Show,” 8/1/11:

“One of the reasons the president was so set on getting something that at least takes us past the election is that they did see, Aha, gee, they are going to hold us hostage on the debt ceiling again in the next few months.”

Chris Matthews, host of MSNBC’s “Hardball,” 8/2/11:

“What we saw — what I saw, at least, was one guy with a knife and the other trying to avoid being cut. It was a thug attacking a victim. It was a mugging.”

Lawrence O’Donnell, host of MSNBC’s “The Last Word,” 8/1/11:

“The president’s instincts were good on how to handle the Somali pirates when they took hostages, but here the president knew he was dealing with a hostage-taking, and he never came out and said, ‘Ok, here are the limits.’”

Laura Flanders, host Grit TV on MSNBC’s “The ED Show,” 8/1/11:

“The problem we are facing is not a handful of Tea Party hostage-takers. The problem in the country is the headlock that a few corporate interests and some very wealthy elites have put on our revenues.”

Hilary Rosen, Democratic strategist, on CNN’s “Piers Morgan Tonight,” 8/3/11:

“They took John Boehner hostage. They forced to do a plan that was unrealistic politically, and then the grown-ups in the Senate — Sen. Mitch McConnell and Sen. Harry Reid — had to kind of takeover and come up with a compromise and force it on the House.”

Michael Lind, policy director of the Economic Growth Program at the New America Foundation writing in Salon magazine, 8/2/11:

“The debt ceiling crisis is the latest case in which the radical right in the South has held America hostage until its demands are met.”

Editorial page, The New York Times, 7/31/11:

“The deal would avert a catastrophic government default, immediately and probably through the end of 2012. The rest of it is a nearly complete capitulation to the hostage-taking demands of Republican extremists.”

Fareed Zakaria, CNN host, on “Anderson Cooper 360,” 7/29/11:
“So, instead of accepting some compromise that can get through the democratic process, what they’re saying is we’ll blow up the country if you don’t listen to us. We’ll hold hostage the credit of the United States, the good standing of the United States and we’ll blow it up.”

Dana Milbank, columnist for The Washington Post, 8/3/11:
“But the Federalist Papers make no mention of the sort of hostage situation that unfolded in recent weeks. The Founders were silent on the rights of a small group of lawmakers, claiming they received marching orders from God, to bring the nation to the edge of default. The Constitution doesn’t specifically mention negotiating walkouts, Satan sandwiches and deeming budgets into law without votes.”

Ruth Marcus, columnist for The Washington Post, 8/3/11:

“Welcome to the new Washington normal: endless rounds of legislative carjacking … One side wanted the car, had a gun and wasn’t afraid — certainly not afraid enough — to use it. The other had a child in the back seat.”

Source Paul Conner, The Daily Caller

Even the Progressive-in-Chief uses the violence imagery of Republican’s with guns against the heads of the American people

Not too long ago in the 2004 elections the American people threw Democrats out of power in Congress for the first time in about 50 years prior to that. Subsequent to those events Democrats in the minority held Congress up to the extent that during the years of 2004-2008 Congress was called the, “Do Nothing Congress.”

One might even say the Democratic minority in Congress held a gun to the head of the American people and prevented Congress from doing it’s work. They could have being called jihadists, or hostage takers, or extremists, or terrorist, or Hobbits or for that matter they could have being called any of the violent or demeaning adjectives that Conservative Republicans and Tea Party-Americans are called today.

They weren’t. And maybe that’s because they didn’t have an opposing Progressive media and opposing Progressive Liberal politicians to defend against or libel or slander them.

However what we have today is an extreme form of Projection Psychosis where Liberals and their Media cohorts are looking at their own reflections in a mirror. And they are pointing their collective fingers and are shouting terrorist, terrorist, terrorist. Ironically, to borrow from the late Michael Jackson the terrorist in the mirror is not Tea Party-

Americans, the man in the mirror is Liberals’ own reflected image.
But Progressive Liberal projection psychosis will not allow Liberals to see that. The hostage taking terrorist monsters are really projections of themselves. They are the hostage taking terrorists that they accuse Tea Party-Americans of being.

Finally if Democrats believe, as they say, that Americans who participate in Tea parties are terrorists, the Democrats that harbor such ill-will toward citizens of the United States should voluntarily leave any held political office immediately. If you fail to leave Americans will use the bullet of the ballot to drive you from office in 2012. That’s everyone, including the president, who uses the metaphor of a gun to describe the normal work of dissent in Congress. Remember, every Democrat in 2006 the President, Harry Reid and all other Democrats voted in lockstep against raising the debt ceiling.

Obama the Destroyer

The fact is, he's good at dismantling. He's good at critiquing. He's good at not being the last guy, the one you didn't like. But he's not good at building, creating, calling into being. He was good at summoning hope, but he's not good at directing it and turning it into something concrete that answers a broad public desire. —Peggy Noonan

Peggy Noonan made a salient observation about president Barry Hussein Soetoro the other day. No not that he is a loser, although that was an impactful statement within itself. But a more apropos recognition is that Soetoro is a destroyer. That is the point that captured my attention in her opinion piece, “ They’ve Lost that Lovin’ Feeling.” Noonan observation was that the president is good at dismantling and at critiquing or as he would put it, "Fundamentally Changing." In other words, what this president is most adept in is tearing down or destroying. Equally, he excels in negative criticism. Some might call that Ultra-partisanship since his most biting criticisms are always reserved for the other Party.

Now no one has to tell you that, you already know that. You have seen him in action. You have listened to his speeches. You have heard him railing against his enemies, the Conservative Republicans. He has said that he wants to fundamentally change America.

When one thinks about it, Soetoro’s whole hope and change, shtick is about fundamentally changing America. What else could he have possibly meant than to fundamentally or completely destroy the traditional moorings of the country? Soetoro means to push the country away from the Constitutional Republic that America currently is into a totally and radically changed America. But into what?

I believe that president Soetoro wants to destroy the wealth of America and spread that wealth around the third world. It this some warrantless charge?

Obama father in 1965 wrote a very interesting paper in the East Africa Journal about African Socialism. And what he proposed is that to target the rich and the powerful. He said first of all you can confiscate their land. You can use the state to appropriate their land. And second, he said you should tax them. Tax them to what amount? He said to no upper limit, up to 100%.

So here is a guy who was okay with 100% tax rates. Meaning identify the rich and take everything that they’ve got. And while this seems a little bit crazy underneath it is the anti-colonist assumption that if your rich you have gotten rich through greed, through selfishness, through exploitation. So it is as if I came to your house and stole your furniture. Well what is the proper tax rate for me? 100% because it’s not my furniture.

I think by looking at Obama’s father’s paper, which by the way Obama knows all about but is never mentioned in any of his own writings, by looking at his father’s paper you can get an idea of what Obama is doing when he targets the rich.

He keeps saying the rich don’t pay their fair share. Even though rich people in this country today the top 10% are paying about 70% of the income taxes. But evidently, for Obama that’s not enough. Maybe he like his father wants to see a tax rate that goes up to 100%. So Obama’s father is a very interesting guide to what the son is doing in the White house.—Dinesh D’Souza

In Dinesh D’Souza book, “The Roots of Obama’s Rage” Mr. D’Souza describes a man with a hidden agenda. It is an agenda hidden in plain sight. According to Mr. D’Souza president Soetoro writes about his vision for America in the book , “Dreams from My Father”. As Mr. D’Souza describes it, the president is attempting to weaken America by draining America’s wealth and assigning that wealth to the third world. D’Souza explains in the following interview. (see 12:10mins)



Barack Obama Sr.’s paper, “Problems Facing Our Socialism”

PPM41 080411 Bhobama Article 1965

Is Barry Hussein Soetoro a destroyer? Will he destroy America with his goal to fundamentally change it?

Did Peggy Noonan have it right? Are the president’s best attributes his abilities to dismantle and criticize?

What America needs the most is a reformer. Someone who can take this broken ship of state and guide it by the principles that once made it a great country. The very last thing America needs is a destroyer, a criticizer a partisan divider.

If Noonan’s critique is correct, Barry Hussein Soetoro is a destroyer. His presence in the White house could indeed be an ominous indication of the end of American greatness because we Americans allowed the dreams of our founding fathers to be replaced by the dreams of Barack Hussein Obama Sr. the father of Barry.

Obama’s Thriller

As the folks in the White House begin looking toward President Barack Obama’s presumed re-election campaign in 2012, there is one statistic that might worry them more than any other: Little more than a third of white voters currently think the president is doing a good job. —Peter Brown(source)

Barry Hussein Soetoro is the most singular polarizing President in American history. That is according to several polls one released by the Gallup organization and one issued by the Pew research organization. (see article) and (here)

Soetoro’s embrace of fringe special interest groups and strident “in yo face” political strong arm tactics have left the majority of Americans feeling that he hates White people, Christians, Patriots, Republicans, Conservatives, the Tea Parties (Liberal code word for Conservatives) and the Constitution of the United States. (see 3:32min video)



Homosexuals, Blacks, Illegal Aliens and pimply faced college students are the preferred coalition of the Obama campaign. Like the herky-jerky Michael Jackson dance, the Soetoro campaign efforts are aimed to cobble together special interest zombies from their heretofore balkanized hyphenated sub American designations so that they might dance in the choreographed reelection dance of 2012 for Soetoro.

That data point is hidden in the crosstabs of the myriad polls that show a very polarized nation that gives the president a middling job approval rating overall.
Mr. Obama’s job approval rating remains in the mid-to-high-40s overall only because he gets a thumbs up from more than 90% of blacks and gets majority support from Hispanics.—Peter Brown

However for the majority of Americans the treatment from this president and his Party leaves them standing against a wall of rejection and totally unimpressed with this president’s choices of everything from music to healthcare reform to homosexual marriages and to gays serving openly in the military.

Are the Soetoro disenfranchised xenophobes or racists? And why do they feel hated by the president? No they are not xenophobes or racists Zogby is reporting that people on the left are leaving president. It is also reported that Independents are deserting the president. And finally people that backed him in 2008 are no longer willing to back him.

Polls are showing that Americans realize the mistake that they made in 2008 electing a Progressive Liberal and wish to correct their error in 2012. (see poll here)

One would have to conclude that the problem isn’t the people. Instead, the problem is the radical progressivism of the president and his Party. Now that the American people have seen for themselves what progressivism does to a country they have rejected progressivism.

Liberals, Independents, former Soetoro backers and Conservatives alike have rejected the president’s ideology. A man who would take it upon himself to fundamentally change the United States of America something that no U.S. president is elected to do has lost the confidence of the American people for repeatedly acting outside of his constitutional authority.

Therefore, the president is marshalling a coalition of minority special interest groups with the expressed intentions of fundamentally changing the United States by the use of these groups.

The majority of Americans have good cause to think that the Soetoro administration hates them. Everything that this administration has done suggest that it does. From its refusal to prosecute the New Black Panthers on federal voter intimidation charges because the victims were White. To refusing to protect the United States’ borders from the government sanctioned invasion of Mexican nationals. To the suing of Arizona when the state attempted to enforce legal laws protecting itself from an illegal invasion. All these acts have Americans wondering if this president hates this country.

This president has done more to divide this nation than any other president in the history of America. This president is the anti-Lincoln.

One sided Compromise

Speaking on the floor of the Senate Saturday, Marco Rubio (R-Fl.) said, "If we had a billion dollars for every time I heard the words 'Tea Party extremist,' we could solve this debt problem."

Proving his point about the vitriolic name-calling of conservatives so prevalent now, New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman began his most recent piece, "Watching today's Republicans being led around by an extremist Tea Party": --Noel Sheppard

Everyone who follows Creating Orwellian Worldview already understands the Liberal’s plan to defame Conservatives, the Tea Parties, Fox News and Republicans.
Liberal politicians and liberal pundits in the Progressive media alike use defamation has their principle tactic against all who they perceive to be on the Right as Noel Sheppard reports regarding a Thomas Friedman NYT article. (see article)

It is the strategy of the Progressive Daily Kos Leftists to demonize the Right thereby dehumanizing the people on the Right so that Progressive hatred of the Right and it’s institutions is justified in their minds.

Liberal Progressives are consumed by a 21st century slave master's mentality. One which human beings are looked at as less than human. Slave masters were able to justify all manner of brutal inhuman treatment of their “slaves.” This is how Liberals look at Conservatives and Conservative causes, less than.

Therefore Liberal Progressives attempt to brutally dehumanize the Fox News network, Conservatives, The Tea Parties, Christians, using insults, ridicule, derision, disrespect, slander and Libel.

The President sets himself apart as the only president in recent history that has used these Liberal Progressive tactics so brazenly against the oppose Party. By his own doing he is not the president of the people of the United States of American. He has set himself up as the president of only the Progressive Left of this country. To which he has intimated openly in front of partisan gatherings that Republicans are the enemy.

If the U.S. defaults for the first time in it’s history it will because an Uber-partisan Black president and his ultra-partisan Party burned bridges of bi-partisanship for 2 ½ years forcing through their historic massive Progressive spending agenda and told Republicans to go pound sand as they were doing it.

Even in a time when there is the need for bi-partisan cooperation and collaboration in Washington D.C. in light of the looming Debt crisis Democrats continue to use inflammatory language and unkind references to describe Republicans. (see 5:09min video)



Noel Sheppard refers to Sen. Marco Rubio’s speech regarding the debt ceiling debate that was given on the Senate floor. In that speech Sen. Rubio spoke about the vitriol with which Liberals assault Conservatives. Also in this clip Democrat Sen. Kerry took offense and tried to justify the fact that the president voted against raising the debt limit when he was a Senator about 8mins in video. (see 14:02min video)



What is underlining in this debt debate or any debate in Washington is the continued guerrilla word warfare Liberals have engaged in against Republicans.

Rusty Weiss reports at Big Journalism that the Progressive Media, the president and Democrats march in Lockstep with their current meme that the Tea Parties are terrorists.

Democrats continue to demand compromise of Republicans who are in fact compromising when Democrats themselves are failing to compromise at all.

Liberals asks for compromise before the cameras but are continuously plotting to defeat their Republicans counterparts. Liberals have turn this argument into much more that an argument about the debt ceiling.

To Liberals this is, as everything to them is, this is about defeating Republicans. That is the reason why the Progressive media and Liberal politicians alike have turned this debate upside down to argue that Republicans will not compromise.

The truth is, it is Liberal Democrats who are the insurgent non-compromising ones in this debate, they are ones holding up progress in this crisis that we all face.

If the U.S. defaults for the first time in it’s history it will because an Uber-partisan Black president and his ultra-partisan Party burned bridges of bi-partisanship for 2 ½ years forcing through their historic massive Progressive spending agenda and told Republicans to go pound sand as they were doing it.

If Democrats want compromise they should try it. Try compromising on the excessive gains in spending which increased U.S. debt by four times. Democrats put that spending in place in the last 2 1/2 years. Democrats did this in spite of the president's campaign promise to cut the deficit in half during his first term in office.

If Democrats really want to compromise then start by honoring the president's campaign promise to cut the deficit in half in his first term, that's a start.

The other thing Democrats should do is stop burning bridges of bipartisanship. They can do that by ending the smear jihad that they wage against Conservatives and Conservative causes.

Obama says Deal?

On Sunday July 31, 2011, president Barry Hussein Soetoro announced that Congress has come to terms preventing the United States from defaulting on its debts. Although Congress hasn’t voted on anything yet the president, it seems, couldn’t wait to rush to the podium with the good news. (see 4:13min video)



Following is a Speaker of the House John Boehner’s apparent successful PowerPoint presentation given to his Republican caucus.

3 7-31-11 Debt Framework Boehner

Blogger Chris Cillizza sees this agreement as a win for America. (see story)

"Reductions of the magnitude now being proposed, if adopted, would likely lead Moody's to adopt a negative outlook on the AAA rating," the credit rating agency said in a new report. "The chances of a significant improvement in the long-term credit profile of the government coming from deficit reductions of the magnitude proposed in either plan are not high."-- Peter Schroeder

Moody's Investors Service sees the agreement as too little too late. Not enough cuts. $2.2 trillion dollars according to Associated Press over 10years doesn’t realistically keep pace with U.S. spending. (see story)

Remember Democrats want compromise, which means they want business as usual, meaning in this case that Democrats want spending to continue as usual.

According to Moody, this deal may be enough to give the illusion of success for politicians however; the reality is this deal may not be enough to keep the U.S. AAA credit rating.

America we are at War!

"We can't allow the American people to become collateral damage to Washington's political warfare.” —president Barry Hussein Soetoro

Not another war! Yes I’m afraid so. The president has the United States involved in up to five (5) count them five wars. Preposterous you say. Well let’s count them. There’s the continuing Iraq war, which the president promised to end and bring the troops home within his first year as president. He didn’t. Then there is the Afghanistan war, which the president escalated for unclear purposes. (Maybe to kill Osama bin Laden though he didn’t say that at the time.)

Then there are the two illegal wars, the U.N. backed war with Libya and the secret Yemen war.

He also has the illegal U.N. backed Libyan war going, and illegal conflicts in Yemen going. That’s four Soetoro wars to Bush’s two wars. In addition, Bush had congressional approval before one bullet was fired or one bomb was drop in either Iraq or Afghanistan. Presently according to Liberal pundit Andrew Sullivan, President Soetoro has two illegal wars going, Libya and Yemen where he has not sought Congressional approval. (see source andsee source)

That’s four wars. In addition, the fifth is the Uncivil War between the Democrats and Republicans. It is the war for our culture, it is the war for control of our government, and it is the war for the hearts, minds and souls of America.

You may not believe it to be a war but our president does. And very much so. He’s said in so many words , he has said that Republicans are the enemy. He blames Republicans for the U.S. ‘s troubles. Plus he demonizes Republicans every opportunity he gets.

"Again they (Republicans) will demand harsh cuts to programs like Medicare. And once again, the economy will be held captive unless they (Republicans) get their way. This is no way to run the greatest country on earth. It is a dangers game that we’ve never played before. And we can’t afford to play it now. Not when the jobs and livelihoods of so many families are at stake.

We can't allow the American people to become collateral damage to Washington's political warfare.

(see 1:03min video)



On July 25, 2011, the president of the United States of America gave a speech to the American people. But it wasn’t a speech about the raising the debt ceiling as one may have supposed. No, it was a speech calculated and aimed at the president’s enemies, the Republicans. This was a speech promised earlier in the debt talks. The president threatened Republicans as talks began to break down. He told Republican Congressman Eric Cantor, not to call his bluff if the Republicans didn’t give him what he wanted then he would go directly to the American people. That is the reason the president give his unusual speech last Monday night. It was an open declaration of war against Republicans over the debt ceiling.

To whit, Republicans should be on guard. Heretofore Republicans have attempted to treat Democrats with the deference that Republicans and Democrats are two American Political Parties attempting to arrive at solutions that are best for the country. And they very well may be. Only it appears from the Democrat perspective, one which the president espouses, what is good for the country is that Republicans be eliminated completely. This may explain the latent and overt hostilities that Republicans face on College campuses, the Progressive media, Hollywood and their colleagues from across the aisle.

Moreover, this president has allowed his hate for Republicans to show on more than a few occasions.

I would like to now share with you just what sparked the need in the mind of the president for last Monday night’s speech. Below is the account from the debt ceiling talks that the president stormed out of while threatening Republicans that he would just go to the public rather than negotiate with the enemy hostage taker Republicans.

At this point, Cantor explained, the president became “very agitated” and said he had “sat here long enough,” that “Ronald Reagan wouldn’t sit here like this” and “something’s got to give.” Obama then told Republicans they either needed to compromise on their insistence on a dollar for dollar ratio of spending cuts to debt increase or agree to a “grand bargain” including massive tax increases. Before walking out of the room, Cantor said, the president told him: “Eric, don’t call my bluff. I’m going to the American people with this.” He then “shoved back” and said, “I’ll see you tomorrow.” (source)

(hear 14:49audio)

Note: very last minutes audio gets extremely grainy

Eric Cantor on White House Debt Ceiling Talks by smalera

So it seems that war has been declared against Republicans. Listen many of us in the blogosphere always know it. Now that this president has openly declared it—it’s time Republicans, Independents and all fair minded people start acting like they realize that the Progressive Liberal left has declared open war against us.

En guard!

State of Hawaii may be in Contempt of Court over Obama Birth Certificate

A process server has delivered a Hawaii court-issued subpoena to Loretta J. Fuddy, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, commanding her “to produce [Barry Hussein Soetoro’s birth certificate.]” -- Sharon Rondeau

The entire State of Hawaii is embroiled in the Barry Hussein Soetoro birth certificate mess now. You must remember the president’s April 2011 very public celebratory release of his long form birth certificate.

Amid the Democrat leaping chest bumps and one kneed fist pumps, I’d say that it was a very respectful and dignified celebration.

You thought it was over, you thought the “birthers” were defeated and everyone from the Supreme Court to Congress could go on pretending that Barry Hussein Soetoro is a legitimate president. Now who would want to destroy that made for the Progressive media Kodak moment? Maybe a United States District Judge, perhaps?

District Chief Judge Royce Lamberth federal judge in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has allow discovery to go forward in the case Taitz v. Astrue civil case no. 1:11-cv-00402 RCL in the USDC of Columbia. (see Order partially granting and partially denying below)

Taitz v Astrue USDC DC - ORDER Granting in Part and DENYING in Part - Motion to Strike - 6/2/11

Discovery means that Plaintiff, in this case Dr. Orly Taitz, is entitled to certain specified information authorized by subpoena back by court order. No other attorney pursuing the president’s sealed records has gotten this far. (see articles here and here).

The Hawaii Department of Health has refused to comply with a subpoena compelling the state to provide access to the original, filed copy of the President's birth certificate—Jack Miner

A U.S. District Hawaiian court issued the subpoena. (see subpoena below)

Taitz v. Astrue - Subpoena Issued to Loretta Fuddy of HDOH - Obama's Original Vital Records on File

According to the subpoena, the Hawaii Department of Health is legally bond to produce the original Soetoro birth certificate (he already publicly released a copy of the long form) on August 8, 2011 at 10am at Health Department, State of HI 1250 Punchbowl str. room 325, Honolulu, HI 96813. Not doing so, would be in contempt of Court order.



The subpoena was served July 5, 2011 on state's attorney general and Loretta Fuddy, the current director of the Hawaii department of health. The document ordered Fuddy to produce the "original 1961 typewritten birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama … issued 08.08.1961, signed by Dr. David Sinclair, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama and registrar Lee, stored in the Health Department of the State of HI from 08081961 until now."

The Hawaii Department of Health was legally served the subpoena. However, initial indications are they plan to refuse to comply with the subpoena, which grants access to the original, filed copy of the President's birth certificate. In fact, the state of Hawaii responded, saying they would not release the information.

It is extremely curious in my estimation that state employees who are sworn to enforce the law would chose to flaunt a U.S. District Court subpoena. August 8, is days away. We will keep an eye on and be reporting this most interesting development in the ineligibility saga of Barry Hussein Soetoro.

Tim Pawlenty breaks the back of the “inherited” Argument

The two wars were taking place under president Bush on a larger level in Iraq. So again, when president Bush left office there was a $500Billion dollar deficit now it’s about $1.5trillion. Under president Obama’s watch, he tripled the deficit of this country; he looked the American people in the eye in March of 2009 after he knew full well about the wars. After he knew full well about the economic collapse, after he know full well about the Medi Care part D subscription drug expansion and he looked the American people in the eye and said, ‘I will reduce the deficit in half in my first term.’ And then he tripled it. That is just one of his many broken promises, one of his many false statements and he needs to be held accountable for it —Presidential Hopeful Tim Pawlenty

In a recent CNN interview presidential hopeful, Tim Pawlenty took on the Obama “inherited” excuses and uncovered the lies that the president told to win election. Pawlenty’s factual stating of the case was done much to the chagrin of a hapless CNN reporter who seemed to be wincing in pain when Pawlenty eviscerated her feeble inherited talking points.

According to Pawlenty, the president knew full well what the country’s condition was while he was campaigning for the job. And in spite of that knowledge, the president knowingly lied saying that he would cut the deficit in half in his first term.

He(the president) looked the American people in the eye in March of 2009 after he knew full well about the wars. After he knew full well about the economic collapse, after he know full well about the Medi Care part D subscription drug expansion and he looked the American people in the eye and said, ‘I will reduce the deficit in half in my first term.’—Tim Pawlenty

(see 1:57min video)



Now the president’s favorite fallback position is that he’s Black and he didn’t know that things were so bad in the economy. The White man fooled him and messed up things so bad because the White man didn’t want a Black man to succeed.

Of course, the above is my interruption of the president’s excuses for not being able to fix the economy with failed Progressive Socialist ideas and policies in tow. However, you must admit with Congress woman Sheila Jackson Lee‘s tirade on the floor of the House regarding, “only this president” Democrats are getting pretty darn close to blaming Barry Hussein Soetoro’s failure on the fact that he is Black. (see 2:07 min video)



Ms. Jackson Lee maybe this president is having difficulty because only this president voted against raising the debt ceiling when he was in the Senate. What is more he openly admitted that he was playing politics against president George W. Bush when he did it. (see 1:13min video)



In any event, Tim Pawlenty has it right. president Soetoro looked the American people in the eye and lied, stating that he would cut the deficit by half in this first term. Instead, the president and his Democrats allies, set about to spend more American taxpayer money than any previous administration in American history.

Broken promises and lies, that about sums up this presidency. Not to mention that Democrats continue to play the Race card when convenient for them to do so. And it is always convenient for them to do so!

What have Democrats done to fix America’s debt crisis

Obama has an Earmark problem
Other than Blaming Bush (Democrat’s natural fallback position), what have Democrats actually done to fix the debt crisis? Since gaining control of both houses of Congress in January of 2007 the Democrat Congressional majority promised:

1. Fiscal restraint, adherence to pay-as-you- go (PAYGO) rules, and reform of pork barrel projects. They have broken all of these promises.
2. Congress has voted to raise taxes by $98 billion over the next decade and enacted a budget resolution that would raise taxes by approximately $2.7 trillion.
3. Despite their PAYGO pledge, congressional Democrats have used gimmicks and loopholes to add $179 billion in entitlement spending, offset by only $98 billion in new taxes. Discretionary spending is set to exceed President Bush’s budget request by $275 billion over 10 years.
4. Despite pledging to halve the number of earmarks to 6,746, Congress has included 11,351 in the spending bills.

The Blue Dog Democrats pledged to work for deficit reduction but have voted almost unanimously to raise taxes, increase spending, and expand the budget deficit. (source)

Since gaining the presidency in 2009 Democrat president Barry Hussein Soetoro promised to end the wasteful spending in Washington called “earmarks” signaling an attempt to rein in spending and avert the inevitable fiscal crisis government spending was creating. (see 2:18min video)

In 2009, millions in tax-payer dollars went to tattoo removal programs, peanut research and water taxi services on Pleasure Beach.

So who got millions in 2010?
Early in his presidency, President Obama publicly urged Congress to cut wasteful spending. However, by March 2009, Congress had presented him with a $410 billion stimulus bill that included $7.7 billion in pork -- and he signed it.

So what qualifies as pork spending? Also called earmarks, this type of spending is inserted into generally non-related bills as either an award or incentive for political support from constituents and cohorts. The Oxford English Dictionary distinguishes pork barrel spending from normal appropriation spending as "projects designed to please... and win votes." The term predates the Civil War, when barrels of salt pork were given as rewards for good behavior-- Casey Scudder (source)

So called fiscal responsibility by Democrats was offset by massive Democrat spending on a Democrat partisan social agenda. A social agenda Democrats wanted for over 50 years.

Moreover, one, which Democrats felt if not put in place immediately they might never have the opportunity of a Democrat, controlled Congress combined with a Democrat Presidency to implement their Progressive socialist agenda. Thus, Democrats passed by Party line vote, and the Democrat President signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)or Obamacare

Obamacare is a trillion-dollar budget buster and debt increaser. (source)

The outrage of millions of taxpayers following the $700 billion bank bailout and the $787 billion stimulus bill did not stop Congress from passing and President Obama from signing a bloated $410 billion Omnibus Appropriations Act in March. With the subsequent approval of the President’s budget, the national debt will triple over the next 10 years.—Citizens Against Government Waste (source)

(see 1:26min video)

Despite relative silence with respect to taxes on the campaign trail, the Democratic congressional majority quickly enacted a budget resolution calling for one of the largest tax increases in history. Under current tax rates, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects $14.107 trillion in tax [increases] between 2008 and 2012. Yet the congressional budget resolution calls for collecting $14.828 trillion -- an increase of $721 billion.-- Published on October 30, 2007 by Brian Riedl (source)

DEMOCRAT SPENDING

Adopting the President’s Budget. In his first 100 days in office, the President has
signed a $74-billion increase in the government’s already unsustainable rate of
entitlement spending; a $787-billion “stimulus” bill; and a $406.7-billion omnibus, which
increased nondefense appropriations by 10 percent just for this year, and included nearly9,000 earmarks the administration dismissed as “last year’s business.” On the first day of spring, the Congressional Budget Office [CBO] released an updated projection indicating the deficit for the current year (fiscal year 2009) had increased by more than $500 billion– to $1.7 trillion. Now comes the Democrats’ budget, with its huge increases in spending,taxes, deficits, and debt.

• Total Spending. Outlays total $3.555 trillion in fiscal year 2010. As a share of the
economy, spending never falls below 22 percent of gross domestic product [GDP]. Even
with the full costs of the war, Katrina, and Medicare prescription drug coverage,
spending during the Bush administration averaged 19.9 percent of GDP – and never
exceeded 21 percent of GDP.
• Tax Increases. Taxes increase by $1.5 trillion over 10 years. These include higher taxes
on families, small businesses, and workers.
• Deficits. Red ink totals $1.233 trillion in 2010. The budget proposes record budget
deficits in nominal dollars. Deficits never fall below $500 billion.
• Debt. Debt held by the public increases by nearly $2 trillion this year, and rises to more than two-thirds as a share of the economy by 2014. The European Union requires its
member countries to keep debt below 60 percent of GDP.-- THE CONFERENCE REPORT ON S. CON. RES. 13 THE OBAMA PLAN FOR SPENDING, TAXES, AND DEBT
28 April 2009 (source)

What have Democrats done to fix the U.S. debt situation? Nothing! In fact, they’ve made our situation worse by their puerile behavior, uncontrolled spending and finger pointing at Republicans when in fact had the President kept his campaign promises we would not be facing this fiscal crisis right now. (see previous post)

We are not facing consequences from irresponsible governments of the past, as the president would have us to believe. Everyone who should be held responsible for the current fiscal crisis is currently in office. They are Democrats and they can be voted out in November of 2012.

The president, his agenda, his policies and his Party has made the financial crisis worse, Democrats have made everything worse, far worse!

Not Inherited Created Mr. president

I agree with columnist Mark Steyn’s statement that the entire Western world is operating on an unsustainable business model. Apparently, everyone realizes this, except the president of the United States, his Democrat allies and the Progressive media that supports Democrats. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and his Democrat controlled Senate defeated the Congressional House’s, “Cut, Cap and Balance” measure last week. It was the only plan on paper, a Republican initiated bill, offered to avert this financial crisis.

However because it was a Republican bill Reid fist pumped in the air in celebration of the defeated Republican fix of the economy à la Tiger Woods and then promptly sent the Senate home for a weekend recess.

Apparently, Reid and president Barry Hussein Soetoro prefer their favorite approach to solving the country’s debt problems the, “Tax, Spend and Pretend” approach. That approach simply stated is to keep on taxing the American people, keep on spending their hard earned money and keep on pretending that the policies and programs that Democrats have spent trillions of dollars on in the last 2 ½ years have and are working. They are not.

We’ve been told repeatedly that President Barry Hussein Soetoro inherited the fiscal crisis that America faces. But did he? Would it surprise you to find out that Soetoro did not inherit this fiscal crisis, as he would have you and me to believe? He and his fellow Democrat Senators and Congress members were at the center of the making of this fiscal crisis. You don’t have to believe me, I have Sen. Soetoro himself arguing for the first bailout stimulus that George Bush gave to foreign banks, foreign interest, Wall Street, and Corporations. You see as much as Democrats want to blame Bush they had equal share in creating this crisis. No one not president Soetoro or any Democrat is innocent in this matter.

In 2008, Senator Barry Hussein Soetoro argued for the bail out of big banks and Corporations to the tune of $700billion dollars. Therefore the lie that he inherited the fiscal mess we find ourselves in is just that a lie. He was in the Senate, he argued for the $700billion dollar bailout and he voted for it.

Therefore, Senator Soetoro and all Democrats were a part of the government that is to blame for this crisis. Bush’s failed policies that drove the country’s economic car into the ditch are Democrats’ and president Soetoro’s failed policies that drive America’s car into the ditch.

So it is a lie for Democrats to characterize the fiscal meltdown as happening because of “Bush failed policies.” Sen. Soetoro himself argued for these polices. Those policies are just as much Soetoro’s “failed policies” as anyone else’s. (see 13:33min video)



What is interesting is Soetoro was also arguing for the failed policies that he eventually put in place upon his election, policies that caused the current debt-ceiling crisis because of his and Democrats’ massive trillions of dollars spending agenda. An agenda, which Democrats put in place Soetoro’s first year in office and continue up to today. These are the agenda’s and policies that Democrats refuse to cut.

The president simply isn’t credible when he says that he inherited the US’s fiscal problems. He and his Party, those whose constitutional duty is the economic welfare of this country, created by legislation the fiscal crisis we now face. The president is not an innocent by-stander in this matter. He was one of the drive-by shooters of the congress.

In truth, reckless Democrat Congressional policies drove the American car into the ditch and now a Democrat president will push that car over a cliff if he is allowed to claim innocence in this debt crisis debate.

Republicans in the House of Representatives are the only ones that were responsible enough to come up with a plan to fix the debt crisis placing the proverbial ball in the president’s and Senate’s court. Senate leader Harry Reid and the Democrat controlled Senate stopped the only plan in Washington D.C. to help avert the pending fiscal crisis then took the ball and went home. Proving for one and all that the August 2, deadline is not real and proving that the only responsible adults in D.C. are the Republicans in the House.

The Democrats in the Senate and the White house are puerile little spendthrifts that want to raise yours and my taxes by “tax, spend and pretend” or they are not going to make a deal.

Here’s a suggestion, if Democrats really want to increase taxes on Americans then at least have the decency and the guts to call tax increases by their name, “tax increases” instead of calling them by the code word “revenues.”

I have an idea, every politician who wants to raise taxes on the American people and call those tax increases “revenues” must be voted out of office in 2012 and 2014.

So let’s do a national tally. Start counting how many politicians use the cloaking term for tax increases, “revenues” and we’ll compile a list. Come 2012 and 2014 all who use the term revenues because they think Americans are too stupid to know that they are actually speaking of raising our taxes we’ll fire. And we will align ourselves with representatives who won’t insult our intelligence in 2012 and 2014.

In other words if you are speaking about raising taxes on the American people and you call it raising revenues the American people will create an environment which you will inherit unemployment. We will fire you!

How that is for straight talk Mr. president and Senators?

Increasing Revenues means Raising Taxes in any ones language

Dear friends and Readers for the first time since 2006 I will be taking some extended time off. I plan to return July 22nd, 2011. Thank you for your continued loyalty I hope to serve you again soon. --Alaphiah

The President wants the debt ceiling raised so that Democrats can do what they do best, spend money.

It's not like Democrats didn’t have the opportunity to attack the fiscal crisis that they “inherited.” The president entered office knowing that the U.S. was broke. In fact, the prudent thing would have been to add as little government and fiscal commitments as possible and work on deficit reduction.

However, Democrats didn’t do that. What the Democrats did instead was irresponsibly push through the most costliest and unprecedented trillion dollar spending spree in the history of the United States on their Progressive social agenda.

Republicans, in the beginning of 2008, where numerically unable to stop the Democrat majority from forcing the policies of Obamacare, the Automobile takeover and the bank bailouts through Congress. As a result, in 2010 the American people elected Republicans to put a finger in the dike of Democrat spending an apparent effort to ward off the collapse of America’s finances and the consequences of uncontrolled Democrat spending.

In a fact check of the president’s tantrum, which he threw because Republicans are doing what the American people elected them to do, Glenn Kessler rates the President’s statement that Republicans are attempting to protect millionaires and billionaire from tax increases. Mr. Kessler said that statement is two "Pinocchios" false!

We realize the symbolic value of things like corporate jets, particularly when Republicans appear to be refusing to accept even a single dollar of additional revenue, but Obama is misleading when he suggests that closing this loophole would make much of a dent in the federal budget. He also should made clear that he would like to raise taxes on people making more than $250,000, rather than just “millionaires and billionaires.”—Glenn Kessler

Kessler also warns that when the president says millionaires and billionaires he is really speaking about raising taxes on people making $250,000 a year, which is not exactly a millionaire or billionaire. (see article)

What is important to remember is that when the president blames Republicans for the crisis, which he now finds himself. He is the one who when asked in 2009 at the beginning of his presidency where America was going to get money to pay for his social agenda and he said, “We’re out of money now!” (see 2:10min video)



When the president excoriates Republicans for not being willing to raise taxes on millionaire and billionaire just remember that the president is actually speaking of raising taxes on those who make $250,000 a year. In addition, had Democrats not push through their trillion dollars social agenda and instead worked on cutting spending and reducing the deficit there would be a mutual willingness to work on America’s fiscal problems instead of the poison well of partisanship that the president and leaders in the Democrat Party has created.

Republicans are right in this case. Democrats need to reverse all of the social spending and Corporate entitlements that they have put in place for their friends before there is any talk about increasing taxes or raising the debt ceiling.

Harold Koh:Hostilities is an ambiguous term of art

Facing the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, legal adviser Harold Hongju Koh laid out a flurry of legal arguments to justify the [war in Libya.]

When is an illegally waged war really not a war at all? When president Barry Hussein Soetoro redefines reality and preposterously attempts to suggest that bombing Libya and attempting to assassinate Moammar Gadhafi are not hostile war actions.

Jeh C. Johnson, the Pentagon general counsel, and Caroline D. Krass, the acting head of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, told the White House that they believed that the United States military’s activities in the NATO-led air war amounted to “hostilities.” Under the War Powers Resolution, according to the New York Times

The president rejected his top legal advisor’s counsel and selected opinions of known Democrat partisans working in his administration the White House counsel, Robert Bauer, and the State Department legal adviser, Harold H. Koh.

Harold Hoh a former professor of international law and dean of the Yale Law School is a Radical Left-wing Liberal. Hoh argued before Congress the ambiguous stance that the hostiles in Libya were not hostiles at all. Hoh’s argument stated that the word hostility has not been legally defined therefore the word hostilities is an “ambiguous term of art.” Huh? (see story)

No wonder American courts are a wreck, this kind of nonsensical argument is made in courts all of the time and Liberal judges are prone to agree with such dribble. In both the Iraq and the Afghanistan wars president George W. Bush sought and received authorization from Congress before one bullet was fired or one bomb was dropped in either war in accordance with the war powers resolution. Even so, Liberals called the wars, which Congress approved illegal.

SEC. 2. (a) It is the purpose of this joint resolution to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations.-- Joint Resolution, Concerning the War Powers of Congress and the President.

It is absolutely astonishing that this president according to Liberal blogger Andrew Sullivan is conducting two illegal wars, Libya and Yemen, with no outcry from the left. In fact the silent hypocrisy of the Left is deafening (see source)

War Powers Resolution

“I think you’ve undermined the credibility of this administration. I think you’ve undermined the integrity of the War Powers act,” said Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.). “You’ve done a great disservice to our country.”--Sen. Corker reply to Harold Koh's argument that the president doesn't have to get congressional approval.

What is so amazing is the Soetoro administration is arguing simultaneously that they do not need Congressional approval to wage war in Libya but Congress should give them authority to do so anyways.

Why this president would waste time making this outrageous argument is beyond reason. He could have ask Congress for authority to wage war against Libya and been compliant within the law.

Mind you, this is the same administration that just forced Americans to buy government-mandated healthcare, which has been ruled, unconstitutional in several federal courts.
This administration rather play legal gymnastics with words and meaning rather than comply with the constitution and the rule of law. However, if Americans, that don’t receive one of the over 2,000 waivers, don't comply with government-mandated healthcare there is written in the law heavy fines and even jail.

The hypocrisy of the Barry Hussein Soetoro presidency and administration is amazing. For this president hostility against the constitution and the American people is an unambiguous term of art.

Obama in violation of FEC laws again?

One would think that a former Constitutional senior lecturer of the University of Chicago law school, president Barry Hussein Soetoro, would know better than to violate Federal Election Commission laws in his reelection bid.

Yet here he is using the White house to promote a campaign event that is sponsored by his reelection committee, Obama for America 2012. (see 30sec. video)



As we can clearly see from the different landmarks in the room, the lamp for example, the room that the president is campaigning in is the same room in the White house that he gives his Weekly Addresses. (see pictures following)

Weekly Address from the White house (picture)



Campaign Fundraiser (picture)



In a very recent complaint filed before the F.E.C. the Ohio Democrat Party alleged that Josh Mandel and elected public official used resources of his state campaign and the resources of his state office to support his run for the U.S. Senate.

Complainant files this complaint under 2 U.S. C. §437g (a)(1) against Josh Mandel, Citizens for Josh Mandel, and Steven R. Cuckler, treasurer (“Respondents”). For apparent violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act (“FECA” or the “Act”). Several months ago, Mandel ran and was elected State Treasurer of Ohio. It now seems, however, that Mandel is using the resources of his state campaign and the resources of his state office to support a new run for the U.S. Senate. Federal law clearly prohibits this kind of conversion of state campaign and official resources, and the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) should immediately open an investigation to determine the full scope of Mandel’s questionable practices. (source)

The president seems to have engaged in the very same violation that Josh Mandel is accused of by using the White house for his 2012 reelection bid.

However, this is not the first time that president Barry Hussein Soetoro has violated election law. In the 2010 midterm, Elections President Soetoro and Senator Patty Murray broke Washington state election laws by campaigning on the state funded University of Washington college campus.

Patty Murray's 2010 Midterm Elections campaign received scrutiny for violations of state and federal law, after a WorkSource employee used government resources to organize support for Murray’s campaign. Senator Patty Murray’s re-election campaign met with the state worker with the purpose of asking for campaign work to be done using state resources.[10] Using taxpayer money, WorkSource employee Sally Garcia asked veterans to contact Kerala Hise, either by telephone or at a pattymurray.com address, to get involved in a ”walk and knock" to remind people to vote for Murray’s re-election.[11]
President Obama and Patty Murray broke Washington state laws by campaigning on the state funded University of Washington college campus.[12] According to RCW 42.17.130, Use of public office or agency facilities in campaigns — Prohibition — Exceptions, "No elective official nor any employee of his [or her] office nor any person appointed to or employed by any public office or agency may use or authorize the use of any of the facilities of a public office or agency, directly or indirectly, for the purpose of assisting a campaign for election of any person to any office or for the promotion of or opposition to any ballot proposition." According to RCW 42.52.180, Use of public resources for political campaigns, "No state officer or state employee may use or authorize the use of facilities of an agency, directly or indirectly, for the purpose of assisting a campaign for election of a person to an office or for the promotion of or opposition to a ballot proposition. Knowing acquiescence by a person with authority to direct, control, or influence the actions of the state officer or state employee using public resources in violation of this section constitutes a violation of this section." (see source)

As the president and the vice president would say, this is a really “big deal.” This president is presently conducting two illegal wars, Libya and Yemen without fulfilling the constitutional requirement to get Congressional authority, something that George W. Bush did prior to engaging in Iraq and Afghanistan.

With this apparent violation of the F.E.C., the president seems to be signaling that he doesn’t intend to play by the rules anytime soon.

All things considered, there is emerging a continued pattern of lawlessness from this White house. If the video is proven authentic and if the president is found to be violation of F.E.C. regulations he should be made to suffer the penalties and fines afforded for such violators.

If the president isn’t made to obey the law in this matter, I’m afraid sometime in the near future we will see once again the New Black Panthers and ACORN helping in the reelection effort of President Soetoro.

Who’s going to stop that, AG Eric Holder?

CBO: We don't estimate speeches

The country is facing a fiscal disaster greatly exacerbated by the policies of the Obama administration and congressional Democrats, but so far the president has refused to acknowledge the problem or act to alleviate it. He has been struggling to avoid making tough choices, hoping instead to paper over our troubles with words and so distract voters from the need for action. -- YUVAL LEVIN

He is a speech-giving machine. Just point him in the direction of the nearest teleprompter and podium and he will perform as if he were playing the classical Canon in D on piano or Pachelbel.

So imagine my surprise when Congressional Budget Office (CBO) director Douglas Elmendorf whose job is to give factual analysis on U.S. fiscal policy and government budget matters, was asked about the president’s budget which he proposed in February of this year and a subsequent speech he made in April outlining the president’s goals and policies. Mr. Elmendorf response was, “We don’t estimate speeches.” (see story)

The Democratic Senate has not proposed a budget in either of the last two years. In February, President Obama offered a budget that would actually increase the deficit. Then in a speech in April, he essentially retracted it, and offered in its place a vague and incoherent series of policy goals that left Democrats with no particular agenda. On June 23, at a hearing of the Budget Committee, CBO director Douglas Elmendorf was asked what his agency made of the proposals in that presidential address. “We don’t estimate speeches,” he said. “We need much more specificity than was provided in that speech.”

But Mr. Elmendorf words are important. Our president has told us so. He and his Democrat colleagues spend a great amount of time speaking to the American people about things like “hope and change” and how everything that is wrong in America is Bush’s fault.

So why can’t you take the president’s April speech and tell us if what he’s proposing is going to actually reduce the deficit? Oh that’s right what the president said was just words and you need specific data on which to base any estimates.

All of which reminds me of what Hillary Clinton said about president Soetoro in the 2008 campaign. Ms. Clinton told us all that Barry Hussein Soetoro would not be a leader. According to Mrs. Clinton Barry Soetoro is a speechmaker and very little else. (see :23sec video)

“Speeches don’t put food on the table,” Mrs. Clinton said at a General Motors plant in Warren, Ohio, on Thursday morning. “Speeches don’t fill up your tank, or fill your prescription, or do anything about that stack of bills that keeps you up at night.”
“My opponent gives speeches. I offer solutions.”

“It’s about whether you choose the power of solutions over the power of speeches.”—2008 presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton

The word is the president is now going to join in the budget talks. My hope is that talks turn into some actionable debt and deficit reduction policies. If they don’t the president is in jeopardy of losing any credibility that his words many have ever had.

Why I’m not a Democrat

I came across a video that may have intended to have the opposite affect yet what it did was bring clarity to the stark differences between the Right and the Left. Though obviously intend as a propaganda piece it exposes the blatant inanity of Democrats and the Democrat Party.

College Democrats of America or CDA really cemented in my mind why I am not a Democrat. Listening to pimply faced college students in cult like fashion regurgitate the gruel of Liberal dogma made me sick to my stomach.

To think that we have entrusted our world to people who think like them. From the CEOs of major companies to the Democrats in the Senate, Democrats in the House and to the Democrat President of the United States, they are all one in the same. They are all Weinercrats!

Former New York Congressman Anthony Weiner may be gone (for now) but the philosophies that made him drop his pants on the ground are clearly enounced in the Liberal mind set. Moreover, video and all explains why America is on the decline. (see 2:17min video)


Furthermore, what is even more alarming is that those puerile thinking young adults will inevitability grow up to be infantile thinking adults along the order of a Janeane Garofalo or a Keith Olbermann who clearly confuse the ability to speak with having something true and relevant to say. (see 6:11min video)



I am a Conservative because preserving what has made America a great nation is worth fighting for. No, America is not nor has it ever been perfect. However, the idea that this nation would be, ‘One Nation Under God with Liberty and Justice for all,’ is not an idea that can be reached by balkanizing America into little hyphenated enclaves of […]-Americans as Liberals are working to do. Conservatives believe that people, we the people come first, not groups such as Unions or Corporations but people working together to keep the integrity of our government and the union of our states.

Dr. Martin Luther King’s dream of treatment based solely on content of character… and President John Fitzgerald Kennedy’s goal that Americans be less narcissistic and more patriotic are in violent contrast to the “give me my rights” mentality of Progressive Left that presently controls the Democrat Party and who often fight for rights that are not included in the constitution.

What is more, they too often than not, fight for people and causes that were never intended to be included under this Constitution as Mexican Foreign Nationals and rights made up out of whole cloth in the category of sexual orientation.

Foreign Nationals have rights in their own countries but if they wish to be a part of this country they must do it legally not by coup d'état, attempting to force politicians to change laws to adapt to illegal activity by their sheer numbers marching illegally in American streets while waving the flag of their own country. What I just described is an illegal invasion and that is just what Mexican Nationals have been doing in America!

Likewise changing laws to grant Homosexual rights like what was recently done in New York is bestowing special rights over and above what every other American man and woman has.

How is that so, you ask? I understand that is is complicated for Progressives to fathom so I'll go slow.

All American men already have the right to marry a woman. The operative word here is all. Likewise, the opposition is true for women. All women have the right to marry a man.

To be clear each and every American has that equal right protected under the law.
What Homosexuals have done is they have come along and argued for an additional right something very subtle but completely different. In the whole set of men and women a subset of men and women want the additional right to do something that is historically different from the other men and women of the whole set. This thing has never been done in the annuals of humankind.

And yet they have gotten ignorant Judges and Government officials to acquiesce and go along with their new invention in "Civil Wrongs." Dr. MLK, Jr. would puke in his grave at the very thought that homosexuals would use his good name and his good efforts of fighting for civil rights to legalize what he knew and what is an affront to his God.

Apparently, the arguments of homosexuals worked because even most of you believe that homosexuals are entitled to a right that first is not constitutionally based and second most of you believe that homosexuals are deserving of greater and more special rights than the rest of Americans.

That is the inherent danger of allowing special interest groups to create hyphenated Americans. It is the Animal Farm dilemma, hyphenated group are made up as in the case of homosexuals and then special rights are bestowed upon them making them more equal than others.

These kinds of Progressive Liberal ideologies will eventually destroy and separate the United States into two camps, Conservative against Progressive Liberals, each divided by what each believes to be, what is right or what is wrong.

I am a Conservative because Conservative American values have brought American thus far. Those values were not always adhered to nevertheless they are right values. Progressive Liberal values, on the other hand, are not American values they are values borrowed from failed governments of the past.

As we adapt these failed Progressive Liberal values to American culture and the American Government we already see, as in the past so it is now. America is being destroyed as Progressive Liberal values have destroyed all other past governments that have been under its Fascist and lecherous control.

Therefore because I know right from wrong and because I know what has made America once a great nation opposed to the already failed hope and change of Progressive Liberalism, I am not a Democrat!

More Irresponsible Obamacare aftermath

"I don't generally comment on the pros or cons of policy, but that just doesn't make sense. This is a situation that got no attention at all," added Foster. "And even now, as I raise the issue with various policymakers, people are not rushing to say ... we need to do something about this." -- Richard Foster, Medicare chief actuary

You remember how the Democrats crafted their healthcare bill behind closed doors in complete secret. You recall how President Barry Hussein Soetoro signed the monstrous 2,000 page plus bill into law without a single Democrat reading it. In addition, you must recall the infamous Nancy Pelosi’s irresponsible and nonsensical statement that the bill must the passed before we find out what is in it. (see :05sec video)



Well wouldn’t you know it, Obamacare is scheduled to cover over 3 million unintended people skyrocketing exponentially the cost of healthcare for U.S. tax payers. (see story)

And the reason that we are just finding out about this huge mistake? Oh yeah that’s right! (see :05sec video)

President Barack Obama's health care law would let several million middle-class people get nearly free insurance meant for the poor, a twist government number crunchers say they discovered only after the complex bill was signed.-- RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR

Let’s repeal Obamacare or declare it unconstitutional. Oh yeah and let’s get Democrats out of office before they fundamentally destroy America with more reckless governmental policy.

Change the subject you’ve just been Obamtomized

"President Obama is in violation of the constitution and the authority under the War Powers Act as well. The United States Congress now cannot sit idly by any longer." -- REP. SCOTT GARRETT, R-WANTAGE

Did you view the President’s speech last night? Over staged and over produced wouldn’t you say? I thought it was like putting a tuxedo on a goat. No matter how one dresses up a goat, a goat is still a goat.

Likewise sometimes highfalutin poetry in a speech isn’t needed. Sometime prose will do just fine. This was such a time. You see the president just attempted to outsmart the American people by presenting a dressed up speech about troop withdrawal from Afghanistan when consulting with Congress, as required by the Wars Power Act, about his illegal war in Libya was all the straight talk in prose that was really needed. Last night’s speech was an act of classic misdirection. The president attempted to change the subject of the national debate by switching the national conversation from his illegal war to that of troop withdrawal from Afghanistan.

In like manner the president purposely and with great fanfare changed the national conversation when he held a press conference about a month ago producing what he alleges is his birth certificate, a document he previously, for almost three years, refused to show.

By the president’s own admission, he purposely produced the birth certificate at this time to change the national dialogue. He said he was unsettled by the media’s attention on the birth certificate therefore he released what he claims is his birth document to change the media’s focus.

Yes by all means bring the troops home from Afghanistan but don’t attempt to change the national discussion concerning your violation of the Wars Power Act (WPA) by using the brave fighting men and women of the armed services.

No matter how many troops the president plans to pull out of Afghanistan and no matter the timeline, the national conversation was about the illegal war in Libya and the president’s violation of the Wars Power Act because of his failure to consult Congress regarding the Libyan war.

An increasingly war-weary House of Representatives lashed out at President Obama on Friday for not asking Congress' permission to commit United States forces in Libya — but did nothing to stop it.-- HERB JACKSON

Just a week ago the headlines where trumpeting the fact that Libya is an illegal war. They were reporting that Congress was demanding that the president report to them in accordance to the Wars Power Act. (here,hereand here)

Florida Republican Congressman Tom Rooney, who used to teach constitutional law as a professor at West Point, slammed President Barack Obama this week for insisting that the War Powers Resolution does not apply to American military action against Libya.-- Kevin Derby

To counter Congressional calls for compliance with the WPA the White house through the president’s advisors said that they didn’t consider the Libyan incursion a war therefore they didn’t see a need to report to Congress and/or ask the Congress’s permission under the war power act. (source)

NPR, obviously covering for the Soetoro administration, went as far to suggest that the War Power Act was no longer a valid and working law (source)

As the date of full noncompliance rapidly approached and the Soetoro administration would be found in complete violation of the WPA suddenly and completely shifting attention away from the matter at hand the president gave a speech last night about troop withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Then remarkably, the media conversation shifted to a troops draw down out of Afghanistan instead of the president’s illegal war in Libya. That was the purpose of the president’s speech last night.

But wait a minute, just how many wars does the president have going? Bush had just the two wars, Iraq and Afghanistan. Well if you count Iraq and Afghanistan, one that the president didn’t end according to his campaign promises and the other one he escalated on this own.

He also has the illegal U.N. backed Libyan war going, and illegal conflicts in Yemen going. That’s four Soetoro wars to Bush’s two wars. In addition, Bush had congressional approval before one bullet was fired or one bomb was drop in either Iraq or Afghanistan. Presently according to Liberal pundit Andrew Sullivan, President Soetoro has two illegal wars going, Libya and Yemen where he has not sought Congressional approval. (see source)

It is interesting that Code Pink isn’t camped out at the Obama’s Chicago home, 5046 South Greenwood Avenue. In protest of the four wars, the Nobel Peace Prize winner is engaged in.

Makes all anti-war protestors look kinda hypocritical doesn’t it?

Talk about hypocrisy, true story, there’s a person at work who had the daily count of military deaths in Iraq in the back of his car window on flip over placards when Bush was president. But since Obama been president he’s taken the counts down. When I asked him where his death counts were he sheepishly schlepped away mumbling something under his breath.

Hypocritical much?

Bottom line is its good that the president is drawing down troops in Afghanistan but that is not the conversation that we need to be having right now. What the president needs to do is stop all illegal war activity as Congresses is demanding or show cause by submitting to Congress under the WPA.

The time of political subterfuge and political slight-of-hand is over Mr. president you can’t believe that the American people are as stupid as the media and haven’t notice what’s going on.

You didn’t want the national spotlight focused on your illegal war so you switched the conservation to troop draw-downs.

For those of us who have not been Obamtomized, your little trick didn’t work Mr. president. Also it has not escaped the attention of the vast majority of Americans that you are engaged in two illegal wars during your reelection bid, something that even George Bush did not do.

Jon Stewart’s Blind Fox Hunt

Watching Jon Stewart on Fox News with Chris Wallace was like watching the stereotypical aging actress who has confused herself with reality and one of her many illustrious leading roles in the bygone past of the silver screen.

Stewart acknowledged to Wallace that he sees himself as a comedian first as if there is some significant other role, which he plays, something more than being just a comedian.

Yet at the same time, he seemed to suggest that anyone who takes him seriously is seriously misled about his role in politics.

Confusing? Yeah just a little. Yet Stewart has managed to blur the lines betwixt and between comedy, political punditry and partisan political activism while attempting to skewer and dismiss the only real News organization remaining, be it network or cable, Fox News.

Stewart maintains that he is the only sane objective arbiter of what is fair and balanced, while everyone else is either dependent on his objectivity, misinformed by Fox News or we are all insane for taking him serious in the first place. Huh? (see 24:11min video)



It’s all too clear that Stewart wishes to remain in a political duck blink where he can make nightly "The Daily Show" duck calls and take shots at Fox News without being identified as a duck hunter.

Nevertheless, the fact is Stewart is a partisan hunter, only he is a Fox hunter who says that he is a comedian who describes Americans who don’t think as he does as misinformed if, we receive our News from Fox News and if we identify Stewart as a partisan activist, his response is, we are insane.

That’s quite a clinical diagnosis coming from a comedian that has an identity complex. And who also has an obsessive compulsion with Fox News. It appears that Mr. Wallace’s little intervention didn’t work. Stewart is convinced that he is judge and jury as to what constitutes unbiased reporting when he is neither a journalist nor a objective person.

What Jon Stewart is, he is a partisan comic hack who has confused being a “smart acres” with political relevancy. He has transferred his hate for Conservatives in general to hatred for the Fox News network in particular.

Stewart is no different from any Progressive Liberal who as an unwarranted hate for Conservatives and Fox News. Stewart just has a television show and people to listen to his slander of a reputable news network. Which is prejudicial Partisan behavior.

By his own admission Stewart is a comedian, what he doesn't admit to is his Ultra partisanship for the Progressive Liberal Left. To be fair he should own up to this as well.