Tuesday, January 15, 2008

John McCain won’t be the Republican Nominee

The Real McCain is not a Republican



The Real John McCain should be an ex-Senator walking. He shouldn't even be considered as a Presidential hopeful. Republicans will never forget what he and eleven other so-called Republicans did joined by President Bush to attempt to force, Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act, or Amnesty for illegal aliens on America.

Sens. Bennett, (UT), Craig (ID), Graham (SC), Gregg (NH), Hagel (NE), Kyl (AZ), Lott (MS), Lugar (IN), Martinez (FL), Snowe (ME) and Specter (PA) all thought that they would, see us at the bill signing, as President Bush so ugly and arrogantly put it.

But the bill signing never occurred. Thanks in large part to 35 Republican Senators who were joined by 28 Democrat Senators who listened to their constituency rather than the corporate and special interest groups that that were really behind the CIRA.

But the damage was done President Bush, John McCain, Lindsey Graham and the other 10 Republican Senators learned nothing from the 1996 Republican Congressional defeat and they went on to fracture any remaining cohesion that was left in the Republican Party on this single issue.

Proving that the President and these Senators are not fully committed to Conservative ideas and were not smart enough to see that it would take a united Republican effort to stave off Democrat attempts to force their Liberal agenda on America now that Democrats were in the majority in both houses of Congress.

So Sen. John McCain will not be the Republican nominee, because he is not a Republican in the true sense of the word. John McCain is a Republican in name only, a RINO. That is why Independents, Democrats and the mainstream media like him and project him to win the Republican Michigan primary.

The enemies of Conservatives would love nothing better than a phony Republican to be the nominee of the Republican Party. If the Democrat candidate should happen to lose, no problem the fraudulent Republican John McCain would be President and he would ensure that no conservative agenda would go forward.
McCain supports amnesty for illegal aliens, was behind the Gang of 14, is a gun grabber, opposed the Bush tax cuts, ran roughshod over the Constitution with McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform, opposes a Constitutional amendment to protect marriage, was rumored to be considering switching parties multiple times, talked with John Kerry about being his Vice-President, lines up with the global warming alarmists, wants to close Gitmo, wants to coddle captured terrorists -- you can go on and on with this.

In other words, we're talking about a man who could fairly be called a Rockefeller Republican, a Country Club Republican, a RINO, or just a toweringly arrogant, out of touch D.C. insider who seems to assume that any position he takes is right solely because he happens to hold it. However, what John McCain cannot fairly be called is a conservative.
-- John Hawkins
After all of the above one wonders how any informed Republican could consider voting for McCain. McCain has confounded Republican interest too many times and there is one reason that he will not be the Republican nominee even if Independents and Democrats make him successful tomorrow.

That reason is Republicans will not vote for McCain. Why? In one word TRUST.

Republicans can not trust John McCain to fight for Conservative values and Conservative ideas. The reason that Conservatives lost both the House and the Senate in 2006 was because Republicans deserted Conservative values and Conservative ideas.

John McCain was one of the irresponsible Republican majority that squandered away the majority while they were kowtowing to Democrats and corrupting themselves.

The 1996 Republican majority put their own wants and desires above the good of the Republican Party and consequently was swept from power in the 1996 mid-term elections. John McCain always puts his wants and desires above the good of the Party.

Republicans did a number of things wrong but primarily they did not hold on to the core values of social conservatism, small government, and constitutional ism.

John McCain’s stance on illegal immigration has put him on the wrong side of all three of the core values that I’ve just mention.

McCain is willing to poke Republicans in the eye at every opportunity because he feels that he alone has a better way is the reason that he has endeared himself to the enemies of Conservatives while earning him the title of Maverick because many times he alone has caused Republican causes to fail.

Michigan’s primary is an open primary. Meaning that they do not prevent Independents or Democrats from voting in the Republican primary, if McCain should happen to win it wouldn’t be because conservatives voted for him.

People who vote for and support McCain are like McCain they aren’t Conservatives either.

Monday, January 14, 2008

Pay No Attention to the Snow in Baghdad the Planet is getting Warmer

Playing in Baghdad snowfall


'Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!' -- The Wizard of Oz


There has been no increase in Global temperatures since 1998! That’s 7 years of flat temperature contradicting the dire predictions of the imminent and the immediate threat of Global warming.

According to David Deming, South America this year experienced one of its coldest winters in decades. In Buenos Aires, snow fell for the first time since the year 1918. Dozens of homeless people died from exposure. In Peru, 200 people died from the cold and thousands more became infected with respiratory diseases. Crops failed, livestock perished, and the Peruvian government declared a state of emergency.

Unexpected bitter cold swept the entire Southern Hemisphere in 2007. Johannesburg, South Africa, had the first significant snowfall in 26 years. Australia experienced the coldest June ever. In northeastern Australia, the city of Townsville underwent the longest period of continuously cold weather since 1941. In New Zealand, the weather turned so cold that vineyards were endangered.

Last January, $1.42 billion worth of California produce was lost to a devastating five-day freeze. Thousands of agricultural employees were thrown out of work. At the supermarket, citrus prices soared. In the wake of the freeze, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger asked President Bush to issue a disaster declaration for affected counties. A few months earlier, Mr. Schwarzenegger had enthusiastically signed the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, a law designed to cool the climate. California Sen. Barbara Boxer continues to push for similar legislation in the U.S. Senate.

In April, a killing freeze destroyed 95 percent of South Carolina's peach crop, and 90 percent of North Carolina's apple harvest. At Charlotte, N.C., a record low temperature of 21 degrees Fahrenheit on April 8 was the coldest ever recorded for April, breaking a record set in 1923. On June 8, Denver recorded a new low of 31 degrees Fahrenheit. Denver's temperature records extend back to 1872.

Recent weeks have seen the return of unusually cold conditions to the Northern Hemisphere. On Dec. 7, St. Cloud, Minn., set a new record low of minus 15 degrees Fahrenheit. On the same date, record low temperatures were also recorded in Pennsylvania and Ohio.

Extreme cold weather is occurring worldwide. On Dec. 4, in Seoul, Korea, the temperature was a record minus 5 degrees Celsius. Nov. 24, in Meacham, Ore., the minimum temperature was 12 degrees Fahrenheit colder than the previous record low set in 1952. The Canadian government warns that this winter is likely to be the coldest in 15 years.

Oklahoma, Kansas and Missouri are just emerging from a destructive ice storm that left at least 36 people dead and a million without electric power.


Oh and we mustn’t forget that for the first time in 100 years there was snow fall in Baghdad!

But in spite of all of the evidence ‘Warm Earthers,’ promoters of the theory of anthropogenic caused global warming, are warning you to not believe the facts, do not look at the snow on the ground, do not acknowledge that there has been no global warming since 1998 and do not look behind the curtains at the real reasons that they want you be believe in the farce that is known as Global warming!

They’ve even acknowledged that they have a problem with the facts on the ground but they want you to believe them anyways not your lying eyes!
Climate change is still nudging up temperatures in the long term even though the warmest year was back in 1998 and 2008 has begun with unusual weather such as a cool Pacific and Baghdad's first snow in memory, experts said.-- Alister Doyle, Environment Correspondent
So called Global warming experts now acknowledge that the planet is actually getting colder but they what you to have faith in them anyways, just believe in Global warming!

Read their latest mumbo-jumbo attempting to half heartedly refute the fact that it is getting colder globally not warmer!

They are attempting to explain the facts away. The facts are they were wrong. Al Gore is wrong. There is no such thing as anthropogenic caused global warming with catastrophic consequences.

The fact is everything that we are experiencing is a normal natural occurrence called climate change. Climate change has happened since the world began and it will continue to happen whether or not man is on the planet. But you wouldn’t pay for something that you have no control over or something that you didn’t cause so that’s why you’re being duped with all of this Global warming nonsense.

There are only two inevitabilities death and taxes. Pay no attention to the snow on the ground or the colder world-wide temperatures, proponents of Global warming are attempting to establish a world tax on the environment via the Global warming scare.

And that my friend would be catastrophic!

Friday, January 11, 2008

Hillary the Great Liberator

Senator Clinton: Liberating Women everywhere


"Maybe I have liberated us to actually let women be human beings in public," said Clinton, the former first lady, reflecting on a memorable moment of emotion the day before she gained her own New Hampshire victory. --Dana Wilkie
Before Hillary Rodham Clinton women where emotional repressed slaves in public life thanks to their dominate male repressors. But Senator Clinton is working to change hundreds of years of world-wide male domination while reversing the ugly notion that big girls don’t cry!

Buoyed by her surprise win in New Hampshire, which wasn’t supposed by be a surprise at all because after all she is the candidate of inevitability, Hillary Clinton is proving the fact that Americans are gullible to the ways of Clintonian politics.

What the Clintons are infamous for doing is polling for results. They poll people to see what the people want to hear and then they tell the people exactly they want to hear. The people's own polled results back at them.

Senator Clinton will tell you that she listened to the people and that’s why she won in New Hampshire . That is absolutely the case. The Polls showed that Hillary’s image was too strident and too combative. What the people wanted was a more vulnerable, open and sincere soft side. And boy did she deliver!

Now that doesn’t mean that she IS more vulnerable, open, sincere and soft but that’s what you said you wanted and in order to win in New Hampshire that's what Hillary gave you! Only thing is it was all scripted. It was all an act!

Dick Morris a former Clinton adviser says that Hillary Clinton is a control freak and that everything that she does is planned. If Mr. Morris can be trusted then that one moment of quivering voice and welled up eyes was for the benefit of all of you that said that you wanted a more vulnerable Hillary and judging by Hillary’s victory she gave you just what you wanted. You've been played!

Now being the narcissist that she is she has beset and dubbed herself with the mantle of Liberator of all womankind. She is claiming that because of herself, Hillary Rodham Clinton, all women everywhere at whatever stage or station have been released from the bonds and restrictions of not being allow to be human beings in public. Ladies you can now remove your Burkas.

If you’re the head of a major corporation and you are a woman, if things aren’t going quite right just cry a little.

If you’re in command in the armed forces and you're under heavy fire just let it out! Go on cry a little.

If you’re a woman and you are the President of the United States and Europe just sabotaged your economy, Iran just launched nuclear missiles from technology acquired from Russia at Israel and the United States. In addition to all of that, a dirty bomb is ignited in the United States, what do you do? You now have the right to do the human thing,cry a little.

You’ve been freed to be an emotional woman at a time of great stress by Senator Clinton.

Now that’s progressive feminism if I’ve ever seen it! And we all have Hillary Clinton to thank! Hillary the Great Liberator!

Thank you Senator Clinton! And now excuse me I’m feeling a little misty right now.

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Global Starvation?

Corn grows in a farm field near Seneca, Illinois. Upcoming shortages?



"If we will not endure a king as a political power we should not endure a king over the production, transportation, and sale of any of the necessaries of life."—John Sherman

You’re probably like me extremely concerned over who will be in charge of this country’s future. You’re probably equally concerned about the war in Iraq, whether there will be another terrorist attack against America, the reality or the fallacy of Global warming, rising gas prices, or the general corrupting of our culture and you probably want to know who is responsible for corrupting it. Right?

As you think on those things here’s another thing to consider, and its ramifications are far more immediate than Global warming, there is an upcoming crisis with the world food supply and nobody really want you to know. Rising demand for grain to make fuel, food and livestock feed has helped push the prices of corn and soybeans to record prices.
A new crisis is emerging, a global food catastrophe that will reach further and be more crippling than anything the world has ever seen. The credit crunch and the reverberations of soaring oil prices around the world will pale in comparison to what is about to transpire, Donald Coxe, global portfolio strategist at BMO Financial Group said at the Empire Club's 14th annual investment outlook in Toronto on Thursday. --Alia McMullen, Financial Post
Who is responsible you ask? Well just who is responsible for shutting down manufacturing in the United States of America for cheap manufacturing sites throughout the world.

Oil used to be pumped from American oil wells but now wells were built in the Middle East enriching some Americans but also enabling the mind boggling wealth that we see in the Middle East, wealth that has enabled terrorist and terrorism against America. Who is the primary cause, the prime movers behind terrorism attacking America today?

Lost your job lately? Was it outsourced to India, China or another cheap labor rich country? Again who’s at fault for what ails America.

Terrorism, Mad Cow disease, Genetically Modified Food, The Health Care Crisis, Poisoned pet food, lead tainted products and toys are all the doing of corporate decisions to maximize profits and minimize corporate cost and now a food shortage?
"The greatest challenge to the world is not US$100 oil; it's getting enough food so that the new middle class can eat the way our middle class does, and that means we've got to expand food output dramatically," -- Donald Coxe, global portfolio strategist at BMO Financial Group
Donald Coxe believes that the sharp rise in raw food prices in the past year will intensify in the next few years amid increased demand for meat and dairy products from the growing middle classes of countries such as China and India as well as heavy demand from the biofuels industry. And at the centre of the imminent food catastrophe is corn - the main staple of the ethanol industry.

So as you worry about whether Hillary’s tears were real, or if Brittney is wearing panties, or any of the hundred thousands of inconsequential things that we are constantly bombarded with there is a rather focusing reality about to come into affect when you can’t get your Whopper or when there is nothing to prepare at the Aujourd’hui, the most elegant restaurant in Boston because there is no food.
It is time for the American people to get off the defense and take the offense against corporate power, the way it was done in the consumer, environmental and worker areas from 1965 to 1975 and beyond, and move to new frontiers of subordinating the big corporations to the rights and necessities of real people. –Ralph Nader
There is no corporate exit plan to free America from the addiction of foreign oil which they created. Yet we denigrated an American President for having no exit plan out of a war that corporations caused by the wealth that they funneled into the Middle East by their oil exploits.

If corporations had not began using the Middle East as the oil center of the world Islam would not be funding world-wide terrorism with their oil profits. They would have remain powerless tribes running around in the desert cutting one another’s throats rather than buying nuclear facilities now which will allow them to wage an Islam threat against the world.

Likewise if we allow the ethanol industry burn up all the corn to fuel our cars what is the plan to feed the world?

Someone, no, everyone really needs to get our priorities straight before we allow corporate greed to do to food what it’s done to oil and jobs and health care, and…!

Wednesday, January 09, 2008

Hillary stars in the Crying Game in New Hampshire: McCain wins too!




Clinton and McCain’s fairy tale ending in New Hampshire


Just like the movie, the Crying Game, what a surprise ending! Watered by tear power Hillary Rodham Clinton becomes something that she wasn’t in Iowa… a winner.

Not since Paris Hilton cried her way out of jail have we seen the mighty affects of the tear. Senator Clinton showed that not only can crying get you out of jail, but in New Hampshire a planted question and a staged cry is worth one upset political win over the front runner Barack Obama! You cry girl!

In the words of former President Bill Clinton the New Hampshire primaries was the stuff of fairy tales. Recently President Clinton described the whole Obama campaign as a fairy tale claiming that no one is holding Mr. Obama to any standard of truth. But excuse me Mr. President in that case your wife’s whole campaign is a fairly tale because she’s running on your record and she is calling it her experience!
“Second, it is wrong that Senator Obama got to go through 15 debates trumpeting his superior judgment and how he had been against the war in every year, numerating the years, and never got asked one time, not once, ‘Well, how could you say, that when you said in 2004 you didn’t know how you would have voted on the resolution?

You said in 2004 there was no difference between you and George Bush on the war and you took that speech you’re now running on off your website in 2004 and there’s no difference in your voting record and Hillary’s ever since?’ Give me a break.

“This whole thing is the biggest fairy tale I’ve ever seen.” …
-- Former President Bill Clinton.
Speaking of fairy tales John McCain with virtual no National Republican support because of his contrarian positions in the Senate, positions that often put him at odds with Republicans won in New Hampshire too.

McCain’s gang of fourteen which prevented Republicans from stopping Democrat filibusters of President Bush judicial nominees plus the McCain-Kennedy Immigration Reform Bill which is believed to be amnesty for illegal aliens by almost everyone except John McCain are the reasons that McCain has virtually no National support among Conservative Republicans, and are the reasons that he won in the blue state of New Hampshire but won’t win anywhere that there is a Conservative majority.
McCain-Kennedy would establish a worker visa program that would allow employers to temporarily hire foreign citizens to fill jobs that cannot be filled with U.S. laborers. That is not a bad idea.

However, the act proposes to allow individuals unlawfully here to stay and sign up for the program by paying a $1,500 fine. That is a bad idea. It is, in effect, an amnesty--which undercuts the rule of law by rewarding those who have acted wrongly and will only encourage further illegal entry.—
James Jay Carafano, Ph. D., Janice L. Kephart, and Paul Rosenzweig, the Heritage Foundation
McCain has very little money and virtually no Conservative Republican support so to have both Senator Clinton and Senator McCain win in New Hampshire reflects on the Liberal politics there not on the political viability of either Clinton or McCain.

Enjoy this moment in time Senators Clinton and McCain, a moment when reality is suspended by the blue state politics of New Hampshire, a moment when even John McCain can dream that he could be the President of the United States of America. And then before too long awake to the realities that this is a long campaign trail and not every primary will offer up fairy tale endings where the front runner loses a double digit lead in the polls and is defeated by crocodile tears.

Nor will the fairy tale ending of a rogue politician, who pokes his finger in the eye of his party at every opportunity that he gets, winning the day, will happen again somewhere out of the blue state of New Hampshire. And in the immortal words of fairy tale the Wizard of Oz:

Somewhere, out of the blue state, way far away.
There are Republican voters that won’t let John McCain carry the day.
Somewhere, out of the blue state, skies are blue.
And the dreams that John McCain dare to dream
Really won’t come true.

And in the words of former President Bill Clinton, Give me a break! This thing is the biggest fairy tale that I’ve ever seen.

Tuesday, January 08, 2008

Why the thought of a Mike Huckabee Presidency Scares me

Presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee



In the last eight years we have witnessed often times vicious and unrelenting attacks against the President of the United States of America because he was a compassionate Conservative who claimed Christianity as his faith of choice. And for the most part President George W. Bush did not defend himself against this onslaught of overt negativity and as a result both Conservatism and Christianity suffered under his presidency.

It should be clear to all that we now live in a post Christian age in the United States of America one which our Fore Fathers would find almost impossible to recognize if they were here among us today. Moreover this is an age of anti-Christianism and free floating situation ethics, values and meaning.

Therefore it has become increasingly difficult to tell the difference between Senators and Congressmen who are Democrat or Republican.

For the most part until some Republican Senators and Congressmen developed some backbone buoyed by the public up rising against the compassionate Conservative’s Comprehensive Immigrations Reform plan most Congressional Republicans were acting like wannabe Democrats. Nobody was fighting for Conservative ideas. Nobody!

Yet in contrast, Democrats were on a steady drumbeat of using our government, our courts, our schools and the marketplace of ideas to advice their agenda of replacing the American idea with a socialist agenda. And calling that agenda progressive in a completely Orwellian redefining of the America idea where Democrat socialist control of the America people is redefined as freedom.

Therefore anytime you hear a Liberal Democrat speak of freedom they are really speaking of the socialist reform that they plan to establish in American by Fascist means.

If there is one thing that was learned from the Bush administration that is that present Washington politics are not about reuniting people. If anyone says that they can reunite this country in this election they are a liar! If that was the case and it could be done George W. Bush would have done it. Lord knows he tried.

He had a successful track record as the Governor of Texas where he was able to work bi-partisanly with Democrats. He thought that he could do the same thing in Washington D.C. Democrats and Liberals had other ideas.

Furthermore Democrats don’t want the country united around Conservative ideas they want to unite around abortion, homosexuality, illegal aliens granted amnesty, socialized medicine, etc.

George Bush went to the Democrats with heart in hand (inviting Teddy Kennedy to the White house for movies and the like) but what did he receive in turn? Democrats gut him and his Presidency like a fish. And then they set out mockingly to purposely make his Presidency the worst Presidency in modern times. But they failed, no Presidency was worst than Jimmy Carter’s.

Nevertheless, according to Democrats George Bush was the dumbest, most incompetent, most ridiculous fool to ever be elected to the office of president of the United States of America. And Democrats reveled in fact that they could speak both mockingly and dismissively of a Conservative and of a Christian.

This much is apparent the next President of the United States of America if that person should happen to be a Republican and a Conservative must have the political acumen to deal with forces from within and without the government that are saboteurs, underminers, and treasonous.

The next President must be a Nationalist above all else one who will fight for America and American ideas as embodied in the Constitution opposed to this movement to place opinion and special interests above Constitutional meaning.

Mike Huckabee has identified himself as a Christian in his campaign to become President of the United States of America. In a post-Christian era it is virtually impossible for a Christian to be elected President in America.

We have seen the extent to which Liberals, Atheist, Homosexuals, non-Religious Jews and some orthodox Jews will go defeat and void out Christianity in this Country. A Mike Huckabee would be soundly defeated by those converging forces in apocalyptic fashion.

If Governor Huckabee were to win the Republican nomination all of the political hounds of hell would be unleashed against him and if he, like President Bush, chose to turn the other cheek all the cheeks would be immediately slapped from his political face!

One very important thing is often lost in the story of Jesus. And that is Jesus was really a fighter for what he believed. If need be he would over turn a few tables to make his point. At another time he counseled his followers to pick up the sword. Jesus showed that he would even die for what he believed.

What scares me about a Mike Huckabee Presidency is that with all of the forces aligned against someone who claims to be a Christian Governor Huckabee would not have the wisdom of Solomon or the fighting spirit of David (or for that matter the fighting spirit of Jesus) to stand against the onslaught that would surely befall him once the media began it’s ridicule of the Christian faith as it would be bound to do as it did for the eight years of the Bush administration.

Once Huckabee was identified as the Republican nominee all media hell would break out again him and he wouldn’t know how to fight back thus the Democrat nominee would be ensured the Presidency. What we need most is someone who will fight for this Nation and this Nation’s values as I said before a Nationalist.

Huckabee would be easy target practice for the Conservative and Christian hating American Leftist and that scares me the most!

Monday, January 07, 2008

Global Warming: Scientific Delusion or Big Politic Economics

Professor Oleg G. Sorokhtin


The latest data, obtained by Habibullah Abdusamatov, head of the Pulkovo Observatory space research laboratory, say that Earth has passed the peak of its warmer period, and a fairly cold spell will set in quite soon, by 2012. Real cold will come when solar activity reaches its minimum, by 2041, and will last for 50-60 years or even longer.--Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin


What is Global warming other than scientific delusion and big politic economics? It has be explained as C02 emission trapped inside the earth’s atmosphere which prevents the heat that the sun radiates on the earth from escaping thus causing a green house effect were heat is trapped inside the earth’s atmosphere causing the ambient tempetures of the earth to increase to record proportions.
[Greenhouse effect or] the hothouse theory, As we know [it], [is] hothouse gases, in particular, nitrogen peroxide, warm up the atmosphere by keeping heat close to the ground. Advanced in the late 19th century by Svante A. Arrhenius, a Swedish physical chemist and Nobel Prize winner, this theory is taken for granted to this day and has not undergone any serious check.--Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin
This theory has become so politicized that there is very little truth in the socio-political movement now identified as Global warming.

Almost everything that you think you know about Global warming is a lie promoted by politico-economic forces using the latest mass psychological ploy with which force the herd into a direction of their choosing. Remember 2007 was supposed to be the warmest year on earth ever, since record was kept of these things! Well it wasn’t!
THE STARK headline appeared just over a year ago. "2007 to be 'warmest on record,' " BBC News reported on Jan. 4, 2007. Citing experts in the British government's Meteorological Office, the story announced that "the world is likely to experience the warmest year on record in 2007," surpassing the all-time high reached in 1998.—Jeff Jacoby
I’m sure Al Gore and the United Nation’s IPCC are looking their Nobel Peace prizes over for the last time as they consider returning the fraudulently won awards. They have just as much right to a Nobel Prize as Marion Jones has the right to keep the Olympic records and medals that she won while being amped up on steroids. Gore and his associates’ “inconvenient truth” is plain for all to see, they lied about Global warming. These men used more faulty scientific data with which to promote Global warming than George Bush used faulty Intel on WMDs that lead to the Iraq war!

That means that every TV or radio commercial, every so called expert, every ex-politician, every world leader, every rock or movie star and every school teacher that promotes Global warming as an inevitable man-made disaster that can be affect and changed by the green movement has been deceived or is a willing participant in what is going to be the greatest farce and rip-off of the world community to date.
Earth is now at the peak of one of its passing warm spells. It started in the 17th century when there was no industrial influence on the climate to speak of and no such thing as the hothouse effect. The current warming is evidently a natural process and utterly independent of hothouse gases.--Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin
So why are Russian Scientists warning of an impending Global Cooling? Don’t you get it? It’s all out of the control of man. Yes a clean environment is always desirable, however the recent Global warming scare and all of the efforts that are linked to it are not meant to clean the environment, that’s what they want you to believe, the real purpose of the Global warming scare is to put a tariff on the Global economy by which a select few will make billions upon billions of dollars from taxes that you will be force to pay for the air that you breathe.

Russian Scientists have an Inconvenient Truth of their own. They say that;
The real reasons for climate changes are uneven solar radiation, terrestrial precession (that is, axis gyration), instability of oceanic currents, regular salinity fluctuations of the Arctic Ocean surface waters, etc. There is another, principal reason—solar activity and luminosity. The greater they are the warmer is our climate.--Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin
You should be wondering how one can get a refund on inappropriate Oscar and Nobel peace prize awarding. At the very least you should be preparing yourself to resist, by force if need be, the planners of this world-wide scam which is meant to enslave the world by making all industry and all people subject to a world-wide taxation system all controlled by Europe. The Global warming scare is the 21st Century economic re-colonization of the world by Europe under the false pretense of caring for the planet.
Carbon dioxide cannot be bad for the climate. On the contrary, it is food for plants, and so is beneficial to life on Earth. Bearing out this point was the Green Revolution—the phenomenal global increase in farm yields in the mid-20th century. Numerous experiments also prove a direct proportion between harvest and carbon dioxide concentration in the air.

Carbon dioxide is not to blame for global climate change. Solar activity is many times more powerful than the energy produced by the whole of humankind. Man’s influence on nature is a drop in the ocean.
--Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin
According to Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin, Merited Scientist of Russia and fellow of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Earth is unlikely to ever face a temperature disaster.
We have no reason to panic about allegations that ice in the Arctic Ocean is thawing rapidly and will soon vanish altogether. As it really is, scientists say the Arctic and Antarctic ice shields are growing. Physical and mathematical calculations predict a new Ice Age. It will come in 100,000 years, at the earliest, and will be much worse than the previous. Europe will be ice-bound, with glaciers reaching south of Moscow.--Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin
If predictions of the possibility of a new Ice Age doesn't give you pause you're already too far gone. The brainwashing is complete. Or the very least that you can do is call for the cessation of Global warming scares and all plans to enact any draconian tax systems on the world peoples based on those errantly false predictions of Global warming until such time that the science is credible. If Global warming can ever be credible!

Who knows if Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin’s predictions of a coming Ice Age are truth then one day you will be praying for Global warming not vainly attempting to prevent it!

So is Global warming scientific delusion or big politic economics, right now it appears to be both!

Saturday, January 05, 2008

Hillary Clinton is so 90’s

1968 Hillary Diane Rodham



As heard in the New Hampshire Primaries:

Like did you see what she’s still wearing? OMG pants suits went out like in the 80’s! And all that talk about experience to produce change, don’t you have to be old or something to get experience?

I know sleeping around can get you plenty of experience! Maybe that’s the reason she has Bill tagging along as a show of all the experience that they’ve had. (Well at least all the experience that Bill has had!)

OMG, I heard that Hillary thinks that that Obama guy is not ready to be President ‘cause he’s all young and stuff and he hasn’t been in the White house for 8 years in the 90’s like she has.

I would just die if someone thought that I was old enough to be doing something political in the White house in the 90’s, you know? I think I was only 8 years old in the 90’s anyways!

Oh and have you seen that Obama, why he’s so young, energetic and handsome. Yeah I bet if he wasn’t married Chelsea wouldn’t mind hooking up with him! Yeah I’d be his Obama girl in a minute!

Yeah and OMG Hillary is John McCain old! Definitely bringing “NOT-sexy” back!

And did you hear that Hillary’s theme is change? But what has she really been able to change in her over 35 years of politics? While she was in the White house she attempt to change Health Care but failed.

She’s been apart of the 109th and the 110th Congresses both named the “do nothing Congress.” No change there.

Plus she’s still wearing pants suits clearly no change there! But to hear her tell it she is solely responsible for every change in America. Listen to her rant in New Hampshire last night:


So just what change has she already made? And what capacity has she been in to be able to make any changes. I’m thinking that all the old cadgers in spandex leisure suits who think that “staying alive” is a mission statement and not a song sang by the Bee Gees will vote for her. Or maybe they’re looking for that Fleetwood Mac generation that can’t stop thinking about the 90’s to vote for her!

Whatever! I’m just tired of the same old rethreaded politicians trying to pass themselves off as agents of change. Yeah like anyone would want to see a rethreaded American Gladiators return to TV! Yeah as if!

OMG, OMG the Voters in New Hampshire are not even buying Hillary’s bull about change anymore when a focus group was asked whether Hillary’s arguments for experience and change in last night’s New Hampshire debate made them want to back her the group ripped her a new one. Check it out:



I can’t believe that anyone is still considering voting for Hillary Clinton.

Yeah like voting for Hillary would be soooo 90’s!

Friday, January 04, 2008

Back to the Future in Iowa

Presidential hopeful John Edwards


Money, a defining measure of candidate strength throughout 2007, turned out to be not so determinative in Iowa. -- JIM KUHNHENN
Remember when politics were about who had the best ideas and not the biggest war chest. Remember when candidates were selected on the strength of their character and not the strength of their political machine.

Remember when candidates had the backing of the people instead of the backing of corporate giants who exert control over the American government by buying Presidents, Senators and Congressmen.

The Iowa Caucus is a throw back to the days when the people selected their leaders independent of the empty political messages of asking what America can do for you instead of asking what you can do for America!

Universal Health Care equals what America can do for you, Homosexual marriage equals what America can do for you, aiding and abetting illegal aliens equals what America can do for you.

Many of these campaigns are base in promises of what America can do for you. John Fitzgerald Kennedy would be ashamed.

What can you do for America? You can vote for a candidate that will put the interest of America and the interest of the American people first.

What you can do for America is vote for the candidate who will fight for America, enforces her borders, and fight for the traditions that made this a great country.

Those ideas are embodied in America’s constitution not the made up false court given civil rights that killed 35 million unborn U.S. citizens or allows homosexuals to pretend that they are man and wife or protects terrorist by giving them rights to carry out their subversive plans to destroy this country from within as well as without.

Unconstitutional court decisions have declared constitutional acts unconstitutional and made unconstitutional subversive America hating plans law!

As we move on to New Hampshire and other more politically correct caucuses we will certainly see a catering to the ask what America can do for you crowd that will certainly suck the remaining life out of what is left of this country that we once proudly called America.

Iowa was a call back to what we could be if we were free from the special interest and corporate interest which rule us today.

Senator Barack Obama and Governor Mike Huckabee won in Iowa what they will not win again due to who really controls an America that is in its last troughs of freedom.

We will not see again the results garnered in Iowa what we will see in the coming days is an empty political process that is pretending to be the same process that once made this country great.

What we will see is corporate and special interest candidates being forced on the American people by polls and media reporting while America sinks into obscurity as the results of Iowa fade from recent memory.

Thursday, January 03, 2008

The 2008 Liberalism vs. Conservativism Elections


Will American Liberalism stump out the last vestiges of Conservativism in the world? That’s the only question that hangs in the balance in 2008.

World Liberals that have been rebuffed of late by the France’s election of an American loving Conservative President Nicolas Sarkozy and Germany’s election of America supporting Chancellor Angela Merkel . Both new leaders support the Bush administration once and for all dispelling the myth that there is world-wide anti-Americanism and hatred of President Bush.

On the other hand Australians have given in to Liberalism by electing Liberal Prime Minister Kevin Rudd. Now world Liberals are waiting with baited breath to see if America the last bastion of Nationalism and Conservativism will bow to the pressure of conformity to the United Nations and world peer pressure to become like them accepting the theory of global warming and one world government.
Labor Party leader Kevin Rudd's emphatic victory swings Australia toward the political left after almost 12 years of conservative rule, and marks a generational shift that will result in a greater focus on issues such as global warming. --The Associated Press
2008 Iowa is the just the latest battlefield where the ideological opposes of self indulgence and the self gratification of homosexuality, masturbation, Universal Health care and Global warming that American Liberalism represents attempt to put down the evil forces of Christianity, Family values and the rule of law represent by Conservativism.

Nowhere is this more apparent as in Moisés Naím’s article, “The world wants America back.” Or more fittingly I would entitle his article the world wants to use American resources for the promotion of a world-wide Liberal agenda. Naím says:
Of course, the America that the world wants back is not the one that preemptively invades potential enemies, bullies allies or disdains international law. The demand is for an America that rallies other nations prone to sitting on the fence while international crises are boiling out of control; for a superpower that comes up with innovative initiatives to tackle the great challenges of the day, such as climate change, nuclear proliferation and violent Islamist fundamentalism. The demand is for an America that enforces the rules that facilitate international commerce and works effectively to stabilize an accident-prone global economy. Naturally, the world also wants a superpower willing to foot the bill with a largess that no other nations can match.—Moisés Naím
Can you believe Mr. Naím’s analysis in the article posted in the Washington Post? Naím’s thesis statement is that; well let me quote him, "The world wants America back."

Yet what he wrote was a blatant anti-Bush screed full of all of the ignorance of someone who knows nothing about world affairs or what the world wants.

Naím attempts in his article to precariously balance the facts that there is not a consensus of world animosity against America against his preconceived biases against Conservatives and President Bush. And it doesn’t work for the discerning reader nor does it support the narrative that America is hated because of Conservativism.

Even the most neophyte world observer knows that France and Germany have recently openly embraced the Bush administration for the entire world to see. After these nations rejected their corrupted anti-America leaders President Jacques Chirac and Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and voted these tarnished enemies of America and American hating men out of office France and Germany replaced them by voting in pro-America, pro-Bush allies, France President Nicolas Sarkozy and Chancellor Angela Merkel. These are friends to America and the Bush administration.

There is no world-wide anti-Americanism there is only the enemies of an unrestrained Corporatism that is international and owes it’s allegiance to no country.

True Corporatism has been most closely identified with America because this is where freedom of commerce was perfected. However like the ungrateful child that it is Corporatism has rebelled against American law and American accountability.

Corporations no longer obey American institutions of governess or the American government. Corporate power is an unrestrained bastard child that consumes everything before it and then vomits it’s consumption out as waste for others to clean up as it savages world markets in tyrannous gluttony. This is one insular isolated point that I concur with Presidential hopeful John Edwards.

What misplaced anti-American sentiment there is, is only by those who are inappropiately the enemies of American Conservativism and those who have rightly place hatred against unrestrained corporate power.

Those two place are where the hatreds of the left are focused. These liberals believe that socialism, communism and tyrannous agencies,disconnected from the people, like the world court at The Hague or the United Nations, are the rightful international bodies of government for the new world citizenry of Earth’s citizens.

Iowa, New Hampshire and the 2008 Presidential elections will be what the 2000 and 2004 elections where not, the death toll of Conservativism in the view of world liberals.

And if Europe is our example this is how it will happen. First there will be Liberalism, then godlessness and then Islam! Whereas, presently we see that Islam is overtaking and filling the godless void in Europe today.

It is difficult for some to see how 2008 Iowa is at all connected to the end of Western civilization and the beginning of the rise of Eastern repression but make no mistake about it; it all begins in Iowa today!

If this 2008 election is Liberalism vs. Conservativism and Liberalism wins then all of mankind will lose, you have only look to Europe if you don’t believe me!

Monday, December 24, 2007

The Politics of Nepotism and Fear

Bill Clinton campaigning for Hillary in New Hampshire

How we meet those challenges will determine whether our grandchildren will even be here fifty years from now at a meeting like this listening to the next generation's presidential candidates," Clinton told several hundred voters gathered in the gym of the Holderness School here.

The three "very, very profound challenges" facing the country, Clinton said, were growing inequality between rich and poor, terrorism and other sectarian violence, and global warming. And only Hillary Clinton, he said, had the vision, the plans and the record of getting results to respond the right way. He urged his audience to vote for her for the sake of themselves and their children. "This is your life," he said. "This is about you."
-- Alec MacGillis reporting on Bill Clinton speech 2007 HOLDERNESS, New Hampshire



Not since Sean Comb’s (P Diddy, Puff Daddy or whatever he’s calling himself these days) 2004 “Vote or Die” campaign to get the Democrat vote out have we seen such a foreboding warning and a dreadfully tacky campaign strategy. Vote for Democrats or the World will end? or Save the World Elect my Wife Come on you’ve got to be kidding!

Well Sean Diddy here we are in 2007 on the eve of Christmas, by the way Merry Christmas to all, and as well we are on the eve of election year 2008 so electing George W. Bush didn’t kill us as you predicted it would.

Bill Clinton’s pretty good at the politics of scare too Sean, in 2002 he predicted the end of America’s military, economic and political power in 50 years, (Lord knows he did everything in his power to make it so!)

Now on the campaign trail stumping for Hillary in New Hampshire the former President let it be known that if America doesn’t vote for his wife this elect in 50 years no one is going to be around.

So let’s see vote Democrat or Die, or the other snappy slogan vote for Hillary if you want your grandchildren to be here fifty years from now.

Hum both very compelling but I’m not convinced that Hillary or the Democrats can save us. They’ve been crying about saving Darfur for what going on 10 years now and have yet to lift a finger to stop the genocide by Islamic extremist against women, children, and Christians there.

In fact I can’t think of one place on earth that Liberals have made it a safer place to live. Almost everywhere you look where there are liberal policies in place Islam is over running these countries. The Netherlands, Europe or you name it Liberalism has not protected people from Islamic extremist. Just ask the people of Darfur!

Bill Clinton is right about this one insular isolated point and that is, some very, very profound challenges are on the horizon for the world family and we do need to put in place leadership that will act in the correct way to meet those challenges.
The United Nations will not save us just ask the people of Darfur.

The World Court will not save us just ask the people of Darfur

The Europeans will not save us just ask the people of Darfur

Bill Clinton did not save us just ask the people of America

Finally no matter what Bill or Chelsea or her mother thinks about Hillary, no matter how many people she tries to find to like her on that desperately looking for someone to like me helicopter tour the fact is more people say that they will not vote for Hillary than any other candidate and Liberals are no better at solving the world’s problems than Conservatives.

Liberals successfully painted the 109th Republican lead Congress as the “do nothing Congress” only to take to reigns of the 110th Congress and become the Democrat lead “do nothing Congress” the sequel.

Liberals accused Conservatives of cronyism and nepotism for the last 7 years now in an act of sheer hypocrisy or stupidity ( I can’t figure out which) the Clinton’s ask you to elect his family member to be President of the United States based on the fact that she was one of his henchmen in the Clinton administration and did I mention the fact that she is his wife.

And if that wasn’t good enough and if there was any doubt in your mind about the nepotism and fear that the Clintons are using in this campaign, Bill makes an appearance on Charlie Rose and says, (Bill Clinton voice) "Vote for my wife, she’s the best!”

Well he didn’t use those exact words but any student versed in the language of Clintonese knows exactly what Bill was saying. See for yourself:


The politics of Nepotism and fear are not a very attractive campaign strategies but these days it’s looking like that's all that Hillary has to offer. Vote for Hillary or die! Merry Christmas!

Friday, December 21, 2007

400

Don Aitkin, PhD, Professor, social scientist, retired vice-chancellor and president, University of Canberra, Australia, Just one of the signatories and one of the 400.


"Skepticism is the first step towards truth."-- Denis Diderot, philosopher


This is not Sparta where 300 of her bravest warriors faced down the all powerful Persian Empire. This is the 21st Century where once again a small number of brave men must face down a Babylonian Army of United Nations countries hell bent on conquering the known world.

This time not battle readied warriors but men disciplined in the sciences fight for the freedom of mankind against the Babylonian hordes who champion the Bali roadmap.

They have no Oscars, they have no Nobel peace prizes for Global warming, to give them false credibility, but what they do have is science.

These are not United Nations lackeys attempting to pedal mistake ridden hypotheses to support made up minds (It’s a consensus, the debate is over) and wild overstated claims of impeding doom for the earth and her people as we know them.

Doom that is, if we don’t acquiesce and capitulate to regressive horse and buggy restrictions on modern technology coupled with sizable penalties that each person on the planet will be forced to pay in taxes for emissions of greenhouse C02 gases that any cow, bear in the woods or Alaskan Caribou can and does emit with a simple belch or by passing flatulence on the open tundra.

No these are 400 scientists from various disciplines and from around the world and according to them the United Nations is leading the world in the wrong direction.

According to them, "Attempts to prevent global climate change from occurring are ultimately futile, and constitute a tragic misallocation of resources that would be better spent on humanity's real and pressing problems," stated in a letter signed by 100 of the scientists. The December 13 letter was released to the public late Thursday.

These scientist thought it necessary to publish such a letter and then issue a report because they felt reputable scientist who do not agree and are not in consensus with the European, United Nations, Al Gore politically correct version of Global warming are being persecuted in some cases, as well, many of them are being demonized in general.

This new committee report, a first of its kind, comes after the UN IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri implied dismissively that there were only “about a dozen" skeptical scientists left in the world. Wrong Mr. Pachauri 400 scientist to date and their numbers are growing not shrinking!

Former Vice President Gore has claimed that scientists skeptical of climate change are akin to “flat Earth society members” and similar in number to those who “believe the moon landing was actually staged in a movie lot in Arizona.”

So Mr. Gore scientist that don’t agree with your highly esteemed and highly credible scientific knowledge are ignorant and crazy?
About 300 years ago, a Flat Earth Society was founded by those who did not believe the world was round. That society still exists; it probably has about a dozen members. --Dr R.K. Pachauri, Chairman of the IPCC, when asked on February 20 about criticisms of accepted global warming theory
So what was Al Gore doing in Bali denouncing his own country? Gore was doing what he once accused President George Bush of doing concerning the Iraq war. Only Gore’s own words apply to him much more appropriately.

"Gore lied to us" - "He betrayed this country!"
"He played on our fears! He’s attempting set America in the direction of an ill-conceived foreign treaty in Bali Indonesia. Such a treaty is dangerous to the people who inhabit the earth; a treaty pre-ordained and planned to scare people regarding Global warming and Global calamity."

"It is not a minor matter to take the loyalty and deep trusting feelings of the American people about Global warming and trifle with them. The truth shall rise again!"

The truth must rise again for all of our sakes Mr. Gore. No to Kyoto 2 and let Kyoto 1 die in 2012! And long live the 400!
Please see video:

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Global Stupidity caused by pseudo-scientific mumbo jumbo

Professor David Deming

Nothing creates cognitive dissonance in the mind of a true believer.—David Deming,Geophysicist and adjunct scholar with the National Center for Policy Analysis, and associate professor of Arts and Sciences at the University of Oklahoma.

Contributing writer brooklyn thinks that it is a waste of my time to post the truth about Global warming. That very well may be true but I just had to share this article with you dear readers.

Professor David Deming’s December 19, 2007 Washington Times article entitled “Year of Global Cooling.” Deming cites that contrary to Oscar winning and Nobel peace prize winning (did I leave any of his accomplishments out?) Global Scientist Albert A. Gore, Jr.’s dire assessments of a Global meltdown of biblical proportions there is actually record low temperatures being set all over the world. (Imagine that!)

I guess that Bali roadmap is another invention of the Global Scientist emeritus Al Gore Jr.

According to Professor Deming, Since the mid-19th century, the mean global temperature has increased by 0.7 degrees Celsius. This slight warming is not unusual, and lies well within the range of natural variation. Carbon dioxide continues to build in the atmosphere, but the mean planetary temperature hasn't increased significantly for nearly nine years. Antarctica is getting colder.

Neither the intensity nor the frequency of hurricanes has increased. The 2007 season was the third-quietest since 1966. In 2006 not a single hurricane made landfall in the U.S.

Why doesn’t the fact that for two straight hurricane seasons hurricanes have decreased instead of increased, since Global Scientist Al Gore made his dire forecasts about hurricanes increasing in strength and size because of Global warming, give people pause?

Doesn’t that prove that Al Gore was wrong at least in this instance. And doesn’t the fact that Mr. Gore is wrong open the possibility to reasonable people that he just might be inconveniently wrong about his whole scientific theory? (BTW were did Mr. Gore get his degree in Science?)
The voluminous evidence now strongly suggests that unless we act boldly and quickly to deal with the underlying causes of global warming, our world will undergo a string of terrible catastrophes, including more and stronger storms like Hurricane Katrina, in both the Atlantic and the Pacific.—Al Gore, 2006 An Inconvenient Truth
David Deming says that, “Nothing creates cognitive dissonance in the mind of a true believer.” So maybe you’re right brook. The loonies out there that promote this Global warming farce will not listen to science nor will they listen to reason.

And now the U.N. is involved attempting to make money from the Global warming scare they can't afford to admit that they are wrong. If exposing this Global warming fraud wasn’t so crucial because this is one of the schemes that Europe plans to use to destroy the U.S. economy it would be a waste of time. But that has to be told too!

So who are you going to believe Al Gore or the fact that it’s actually getting colder around the Global? Thank you Professor Deming!

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

American Fascism is from the Left

Radio Host Michael Savage, 2007 TALKERS Magazine Freedom of Speech Award Recipient


Senator Paul comments on Fascism


“When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.”-- Sinclair Lewis, American Writer, 1885-1951
Senator Ron Paul and Sinclair Lewis are wrong as all Liberals on the Left are wrong when they attempt to equate fascism to good decent American Christian patriots.

If fascism is defined as a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.--www.dictionary.com

Then fascism is already in America but this Fascism is wrapped in the cloak of civil rights and it is carrying a perverted interpretation of the U.S. Constitution by which to forcibly suppress criticism of all of the Left’s favorite causes; homosexuality, abortion, illegal aliens, the persecution of Christianity, and the dismantling of Judeo-Christian values that have served Western society so well for the last 200 years.
First They Came for the Jews

First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Communists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me.
Pastor Martin Niemöller
If one opposes any of these favorite causes of the Left, Fascist Liberals will use the full force of government to either suppress you by law suit or drive your voice from the public square by sabotage or appealing to some fake discrimination violation.

This is no longer America where freedom of speech and religion can be practiced this is George Orwell’s 1984 where Big Brother is a homosexual illegal alien aborter pornographer terrorist who uses faux civil rights claims with which to suppress other’s freedoms of dissent.

These American fascist are law makers, school administrators, lawyers, judges, union members, special interest groups, front groups and teachers who use the force of the law to implement their personal worldview on the majority of the American citizenry by imposing Draconian laws that continues to force the agenda of eradicating freedoms from America. Among the freedoms that they attack is the freedom of religion to replacing it with freedom from religion.

They are attempting to eradicate Christianity and replace it with homosexuality. These American fascist are even eradicating American citizens in the womb by abortion (From 1973 through 2000, more than 39 million legal abortions occurred in the United States alone)—Information Please and replacing the little aborted American babies with 40 million illegal aliens who transgress American borders and sovereignty to do the work that those aborted Americans didn’t get a chance to do. We continue to hear that we don’t have workers this said to justify illegal aliens in this country but did anyone ever stop to consider why?

The reason that there is a shortage of American workers is the natural consequences of year upon year of the American genocide called Roe vs. Wade.

All that American fascist really had to do was falsely portray killing babies as a civil right and they knew that they would be able to force Americans to accept this horrific American holocaust.

All that American Fascist had to do was portray homosexuality as a civil right and they knew that they would be able to force Americans to accept the Sodom and Gomorrah of the yearly Gay pride parades and the San Francisco renowned Folsom Street Fair.

It was portraying homosexuality as a civil right that got homosexual marriage legalized in Massachusetts and Governor Arnold Schwarznegger to sign into California law AB 394 and SB 777 to force homosexuality on the unsuspecting majority of Californians who have already voted overwhelmingly in 2000 that marriage remain as it always has been between a man and a woman.

Governor Schwarzenegger’s new Fascist laws will force California schools to stop using the words mother and father and husband and wife come January 2008. The Fascist Governor of California has forced every California school to become a homosexual-bisexual-transsexual indoctrination center and will prosecute anyone who speaks against homosexuality with a special "hate crimes" Penal Code statute. Schwarzenegger’s fascist laws will be implemented under the color of anti-discrimination.

Finally ironically Fascist are attempt to remove Michael Savage, who was named in March as the recipient of the TALKERS Magazine Freedom of Speech Award for 2007, from broadcasting where Mr. Savage speaks his mind on the important cultural issues of the day.
First they came for the Christians and I did not speak out because even though I’m a Christian I thought it better to turn the other cheek.

Then they came for Conservatives and I did not speak out because even though I’m a Conservative I thought only Liberals march, protest and fight for their rights.

Then they came for President Bush and I did not speak out because they managed to isolate President Bush with all that negativity and anti-Christian Conservatism plus I was afraid.

Then they came for Michael Savage and I did not speak out because Michael speaks his mind and I think that we should all just try to get along.

Then they came for me the quiet unassuming Conservative Christian who just wants to get along and would rather only to pray then fight for my God, Country and Family and there was no one left to fight for me there was no one left to speak for me, there was no one left to pray for me! --Alaphiah as adapted and paraphrase from the late Pastor Martin Niemöller
An Islamic front group the Council on American-Islamic Relations has targeted Mr. Savage using faux civil rights tactics employed corrupted and adapted by homosexual right groups.

Tactics which are used to falsely accuse Mr. Savage of hate speech with the intentions of damaging his ability to speak freely.

The Federal government has named CAIR an unindicted co-conspirator in sponsoring terrorism. Companies that are supporting CAIR’s boycott of the Michael Savage show are unwillingly supporting terrorism when they support CAIR. Companies like AutoZone, Citrix, TrustedID, JC Penney, OfficeMax, Wal-Mart, and AT&T all support CAIR’s boycott of the Savage Nation.
Federal prosecutors named CAIR, along with the Islamic Society of North America and the North America Islamic Trust, an unindicted co-conspirator in the recent case involving the now-defunct Muslim charity the Holy Land Foundation and its alleged financial ties to the Palestinian terrorist group turned terrorist government Hamas. Also coming to light via the Dallas trial was a 1991 memo put out by the Egyptian Islamist organization the Muslim Brotherhood citing a strategy to subvert the West using mainstream Islamic front groups such as CAIR.

CAIR tried to sue Andrew Whitehead, the founder of the organization Anti-CAIR, in 2005 for libel. The lawsuit was based on objections to statements posted at the Anti-CAIR Web site, including Whitehead's labeling CAIR a "terrorist supporting front organization." But after Whitehead's lawyer responded with a series of discovery requests and documents that, had they become part of a trial, almost certainly would have exposed CAIR's shady background, the organization agreed to settle out of court. To this day, Whitehead has made no changes to the Anti-CAIR Web site, which may indicate that none of the libel charges made by CAIR could be substantiated.
At the time the case was settled, some predicted that CAIR's litigiousness would taper off, but the group seems simply to have shifted tactics. Now, mounting boycotts or pressuring employers to drop political commentators whom they label "anti-Muslim" are CAIR's preferred routes.

This is Fascism in America it didn’t come wrapped in the stars and stripes carrying a cross it came wrapped in the rainbow flag carrying the star and crescent.

Two very strange bedfellows indeed but when attempting to bring down the entire Western civilization homosexuals and Muslims have a lot in common and nothing to be proud of!

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

U.N. Set to Tax World on the Air that we Breath

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon at the UN climate conference in Bali.
[T]here has been no net global warming since 1998. [T]he current temperature plateau follows a late 20th-century period of warming is consistent with the continuation today of natural multi-decadal or millennial climate cycling. --Signatories of an open letter on the UN climate-conference
That is what the United Nations consensus In Bali, Indonesia amounts to, taxing the world for the air that we breathe! In an open letter to the United Nations reputable scientist and experts expose this UN climate conference as taking the World in entirely the wrong direction.

Since the beginning of time on this planet the climate has been changing. It has gone through been at least four major ice ages in the Earth's past. Outside these periods, the Earth seems to have been ice-free even in high latitudes according to Wikipedia.
The present ice age began 40 million years ago with the growth of an ice sheet in Antarctica. It intensified during the late Pliocene, around 3 million years ago, with the spread of ice sheets in the Northern Hemisphere, and has continued in the Pleistocene. Since then, the world has seen cycles of glaciation with ice sheets advancing and retreating on 40,000- and 100,000-year time scales. The most recent glacial period ended about ten thousand years ago. –Wikipedia
For millions of years before men inhabited the earth the climate changed and if man so happens to eradicate himself from the face of the earth the climate will continue to change. Climate will continue to change with or without the influence of man.

Not since a consensus calling for the crucifixion of Jesus Christ has a mob been so wrong about a subject.

Global warming or Climate change as it is being called currently is not about cleaning the environment as one might expect from all of the misinformation an propaganda that we are being fed by the purveyors of this grandiose scheme of world taxation. The Bali conference entitled the Bali roadmap is not going to clean one iota of CO2 from the atmosphere that’s not what Global warming/Climate Change movement is designed to do.

The movement is designed to create a multibillion dollar European regulating and carbon trading industry from which recently formed companies and world bodies like the U.N. will profit handsomely from. Global warming is new multi-billion dollar revenue streams in the 21st Century. This will happen by the implementation of a world carbon taxes that they plan to collect from you and me.

You may think now that you don’t have a problem paying for the carbons that you emit into the environment but have you even been told how much you will be required to pay?

This scheme is like charging every human being on the planet for the air that we breathe. Would you willing pay a tax for something that every being on this planet has be entitled to since this planet’s beginning? Many of you didn’t realize that all this talk about Global warming/Climate change is really about Global taxation. Any time you hear the term Global warming you should think Global taxation or if you hear the term Climate change you should think, U.N. taxes world on the air that we breathe!

What the U.S. is about to agree to in the Kyoto 2 Bali roadmap is $180 taxes per U.S. resident, or $720 annually for a family of four and that’s just what they are telling us now.

You can be certain that these numbers are low end numbers so that you won’t be scared way from supporting the Global warming measures and scared into doing something about a body of people who derive no authority from you who plan to enslave you with a tax that will soon be implemented world-wide.

Al Gore’s Global warming campaign is not what it seems. It is a European C02 trading scheme that is modeled from the Europe’s desire to once again colonize the world. Once again in the spirit of King George Europe is attempting to tax America and this time with a Benedict Arnold by the name of Gore who is helping them in this taxation without representation on America scheme. It is a campaign to enslave the world community under a new tax system levied for the profit of Europe the United Nations and companies like Mr. Gore’s company that make money trading in carbon futures.

President Bush and the U.S. Congress is already giving in to the pressure of the United Nations and multi national corporations that have shown nothing but contempt for the United States of America.

Agreeing to the draconian measures of CO2 emissions that are outline in the Kyoto 2 agreement in Bali or any of the Global initiatives is not good for America because emissions will not be reduced only now we will be charged for emitting CO2 into the atmosphere. By the way there is disagreement as to whether C02 is even a pollutant!

The American people must take note of this and demand that President Bush and Congress protect America from those who intend on taxing the American people without representation.

The American people should demand that our government does not sign any treaty or agreement that calls for a tax on the American people without allowing the American people to vote whether they wish their government place them under the control of foreign interest be it Europe the United Nations or any of the companies set to profit from the Global warming/Climate change scare.

In the words of the signatories of the Dec. 13th letter to the Bali road map conference:
Attempts to prevent global climate change from occurring are ultimately futile, and constitute a tragic misallocation of resources that would be better spent on humanity's real and pressing problems.
The following are signatories to the Dec. 13th letter to the Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General of the United Nations on the UN Climate conference in Bali:
Don Aitkin, PhD, Professor, social scientist, retired vice-chancellor and president, University of Canberra, Australia

William J.R. Alexander, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Civil and Biosystems Engineering, University of Pretoria, South Africa; Member, UN Scientific and Technical Committee on Natural Disasters, 1994-2000

Bjarne Andresen, PhD, physicist, Professor, The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Geoff L. Austin, PhD, FNZIP, FRSNZ, Professor, Dept. of Physics, University of Auckland, New Zealand

Timothy F. Ball, PhD, environmental consultant, former climatology professor, University of Winnipeg

Ernst-Georg Beck, Dipl. Biol., Biologist, Merian-Schule Freiburg, Germany

Sonja A. Boehmer-Christiansen, PhD, Reader, Dept. of Geography, Hull University, U.K.; Editor, Energy & Environment journal

Chris C. Borel, PhD, remote sensing scientist, U.S.

Reid A. Bryson, PhD, DSc, DEngr, UNE P. Global 500 Laureate; Senior Scientist, Center for Climatic Research; Emeritus Professor of Meteorology, of Geography, and of Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin

Dan Carruthers, M.Sc., wildlife biology consultant specializing in animal ecology in Arctic and Subarctic regions, Alberta

R.M. Carter, PhD, Professor, Marine Geophysical Laboratory, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia

Ian D. Clark, PhD, Professor, isotope hydrogeology and paleoclimatology, Dept. of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa

Richard S. Courtney, PhD, climate and atmospheric science consultant, IPCC expert reviewer, U.K.

Willem de Lange, PhD, Dept. of Earth and Ocean Sciences, School of Science and Engineering, Waikato University, New Zealand

David Deming, PhD (Geophysics), Associate Professor, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Oklahoma

Freeman J. Dyson, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Institute for Advanced Studies, Princeton, N.J.

Don J. Easterbrook, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Geology, Western Washington University
Lance Endersbee, Emeritus Professor, former dean of Engineering and Pro-Vice Chancellor of Monasy University, Australia

Hans Erren, Doctorandus, geophysicist and climate specialist, Sittard, The Netherlands

Robert H. Essenhigh, PhD, E.G. Bailey Professor of Energy Conversion, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University

Christopher Essex, PhD, Professor of Applied Mathematics and Associate Director of the Program in Theoretical Physics, University of Western Ontario

David Evans, PhD, mathematician, carbon accountant, computer and electrical engineer and head of 'Science Speak,' Australia

William Evans, PhD, editor, American Midland Naturalist; Dept. of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame

Stewart Franks, PhD, Professor, Hydroclimatologist, University of Newcastle, Australia

R. W. Gauldie, PhD, Research Professor, Hawai'i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, School of Ocean Earth Sciences and Technology, University of Hawai'i at Manoa

Lee C. Gerhard, PhD, Senior Scientist Emeritus, University of Kansas; former director and state geologist, Kansas Geological Survey

Gerhard Gerlich, Professor for Mathematical and Theoretical Physics, Institut für Mathematische Physik der TU Braunschweig, Germany

Albrecht Glatzle, PhD, sc.agr., Agro-Biologist and Gerente ejecutivo, INTTAS, Paraguay

Fred Goldberg, PhD, Adjunct Professor, Royal Institute of Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden

Vincent Gray, PhD, expert reviewer for the IPCC and author of The Greenhouse Delusion: A Critique of 'Climate Change 2001, Wellington, New Zealand

William M. Gray, Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University and Head of the Tropical Meteorology Project

Howard Hayden, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of Connecticut

Louis Hissink MSc, M.A.I.G., editor, AIG News, and consulting geologist, Perth, Western Australia

Craig D. Idso, PhD, Chairman, Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, Arizona

Sherwood B. Idso, PhD, President, Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, AZ, USA

Andrei Illarionov, PhD, Senior Fellow, Center for Global Liberty and Prosperity; founder and director of the Institute of Economic Analysis

Zbigniew Jaworowski, PhD, physicist, Chairman - Scientific Council of Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection, Warsaw, Poland

Jon Jenkins, PhD, MD, computer modelling - virology, NSW, Australia

Wibjorn Karlen, PhD, Emeritus Professor, Dept. of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, Sweden

Olavi Kärner, Ph.D., Research Associate, Dept. of Atmospheric Physics, Institute of Astrophysics and Atmospheric Physics, Toravere, Estonia

Joel M. Kauffman, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Chemistry, University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

David Kear, PhD, FRSNZ, CMG, geologist, former Director-General of NZ Dept. of Scientific & Industrial Research, New Zealand

Madhav Khandekar, PhD, former research scientist, Environment Canada; editor, Climate Research (2003-05); editorial board member, Natural Hazards; IPCC expert reviewer 2007

William Kininmonth M.Sc., M.Admin., former head of Australia's National Climate Centre and a consultant to the World Meteorological organization's Commission for Climatology Jan J.H. Kop, MSc Ceng FICE (Civil Engineer Fellow of the Institution of Civil Engineers), Emeritus Prof. of Public Health Engineering, Technical University Delft, The Netherlands

Prof. R.W.J. Kouffeld, Emeritus Professor, Energy Conversion, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

Salomon Kroonenberg, PhD, Professor, Dept. of Geotechnology, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

Hans H.J. Labohm, PhD, economist, former advisor to the executive board, Clingendael Institute (The Netherlands Institute of International Relations), The Netherlands
The Rt. Hon. Lord Lawson of Blaby, economist; Chairman of the Central Europe Trust; former Chancellor of the Exchequer, U.K.

Douglas Leahey, PhD, meteorologist and air-quality consultant, Calgary

David R. Legates, PhD, Director, Center for Climatic Research, University of Delaware

Marcel Leroux, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Climatology, University of Lyon, France; former director of Laboratory of Climatology, Risks and Environment, CNRS

Bryan Leyland, International Climate Science Coalition, consultant and power engineer, Auckland, New Zealand

William Lindqvist, PhD, independent consulting geologist, Calif.

Richard S. Lindzen, PhD, Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology, Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

A.J. Tom van Loon, PhD, Professor of Geology (Quaternary Geology), Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland; former President of the European Association of Science Editors

Anthony R. Lupo, PhD, Associate Professor of Atmospheric Science, Dept. of Soil, Environmental, and Atmospheric Science, University of Missouri-Columbia
Richard Mackey, PhD, Statistician, Australia

Horst Malberg, PhD, Professor for Meteorology and Climatology, Institut für Meteorologie, Berlin, Germany

John Maunder, PhD, Climatologist, former President of the Commission for Climatology of the World Meteorological Organization (89-97), New Zealand

Alister McFarquhar, PhD, international economy, Downing College, Cambridge, U.K.

Ross McKitrick, PhD, Associate Professor, Dept. of Economics, University of Guelph

John McLean, PhD, climate data analyst, computer scientist, Australia

Owen McShane, PhD, economist, head of the International Climate Science Coalition; Director, Centre for Resource Management Studies, New Zealand

Fred Michel, PhD, Director, Institute of Environmental Sciences and Associate
Professor of Earth Sciences, Carleton University

Frank Milne, PhD, Professor, Dept. of Economics, Queen's University

Asmunn Moene, PhD, former head of the Forecasting Centre, Meteorological Institute, Norway

Alan Moran, PhD, Energy Economist, Director of the IPA's Deregulation Unit, Australia
Nils-Axel Morner, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Paleogeophysics & Geodynamics, Stockholm University, Sweden

Lubos Motl, PhD, Physicist, former Harvard string theorist, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

John Nicol, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Physics, James Cook University, Australia

David Nowell, M.Sc., Fellow of the Royal Meteorological Society, former chairman of the NATO Meteorological Group, Ottawa

James J. O'Brien, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Meteorology and Oceanography, Florida State University

Cliff Ollier, PhD, Professor Emeritus (Geology), Research Fellow, University of Western Australia

Garth W. Paltridge, PhD, atmospheric physicist, Emeritus Professor and former Director of the Institute of Antarctic and Southern Ocean Studies, University of Tasmania, Australia

R. Timothy Patterson, PhD, Professor, Dept. of Earth Sciences (paleoclimatology), Carleton University

Al Pekarek, PhD, Associate Professor of Geology, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Dept., St. Cloud State University, Minnesota

Ian Plimer, PhD, Professor of Geology, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide and Emeritus Professor of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia

Brian Pratt, PhD, Professor of Geology, Sedimentology, University of Saskatchewan

Harry N.A. Priem, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Planetary Geology and Isotope Geophysics, Utrecht University; former director of the Netherlands Institute for Isotope Geosciences

Alex Robson, PhD, Economics, Australian National University Colonel F.P.M. Rombouts, Branch Chief - Safety, Quality and Environment, Royal Netherland Air Force

R.G. Roper, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences, School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology

Arthur Rorsch, PhD, Emeritus Professor, Molecular Genetics, Leiden University, The Netherlands

Rob Scagel, M.Sc., forest microclimate specialist, principal consultant, Pacific Phytometric Consultants, B.C.

Tom V. Segalstad, PhD, (Geology/Geochemistry), Head of the Geological Museum and Associate Professor of Resource and Environmental Geology, University of Oslo, Norway

Gary D. Sharp, PhD, Center for Climate/Ocean Resources Study, Salinas, CA

S. Fred Singer, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia and former director Weather Satellite Service

L. Graham Smith, PhD, Associate Professor, Dept. of Geography, University of Western Ontario

Roy W. Spencer, PhD, climatologist, Principal Research Scientist, Earth System Science Center, The University of Alabama, Huntsville

Peter Stilbs, TeknD, Professor of Physical Chemistry, Research Leader, School of Chemical Science and Engineering, KTH (Royal Institute of Technology), Stockholm, Sweden

Hendrik Tennekes, PhD, former director of research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute

Dick Thoenes, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Chemical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands

Brian G Valentine, PhD, PE (Chem.), Technology Manager - Industrial Energy Efficiency, Adjunct Associate Professor of Engineering Science, University of Maryland at College Park; Dept of Energy, Washington, DC

Gerrit J. van der Lingen, PhD, geologist and paleoclimatologist, climate change consultant, Geoscience Research and Investigations, New Zealand

Len Walker, PhD, Power Engineering, Australia

Edward J. Wegman, PhD, Department of Computational and Data Sciences, George Mason University, Virginia

Stephan Wilksch, PhD, Professor for Innovation and Technology Management, Production Management and Logistics, University of Technolgy and Economics Berlin, Germany
Boris Winterhalter, PhD, senior marine researcher (retired), Geological Survey of Finland, former professor in marine geology, University of Helsinki, Finland

David E. Wojick, PhD, P.Eng., energy consultant, Virginia

Raphael Wust, PhD, Lecturer, Marine Geology/Sedimentology, James Cook University, Australia

A. Zichichi, PhD, President of the World Federation of Scientists, Geneva, Switzerland; Emeritus Professor of Advanced Physics, University of Bologna, Italy

Monday, December 17, 2007

Barack Puts the Cackle in Her Place

Carolyn Washburn


When asked a question that was obviously meant to embarrass him in the Democrat Debates held on December 13, 2007 in Johnston, Iowa Barack Obama had the wherewithal to snap back a zinger and give the Cackle a pop right between the eyes!

The infamous Hillary cackle was in rare form when CAROLYN WASHBURN, moderator for the "DES MOINES REGISTER" (the register who incidentally has endorsed the Clinton candidacy): poised this question to Senator Obama,

[Senator Obama] [w]ith relatively little foreign policy experience of your own, how will you rely on so many Clinton advisors and still deliver the break from the past that you're promising voters?
With laughter spilling from the audience and Senator Clinton egging it on with the mocking remark, “I want to hear that!”

Senator Obama delivered a brilliant unexpected and what seemed to be a totally inspired reply. In fact, Obama’s answer was something that Senator Clinton didn’t want to hear! Obama quipped, “Well, Hillary, I’m looking forward to you advising me, as well.”

Whether anyone realizes it or not this somewhat innocuous counterstrike not only turned the tables on Senator Clinton in the debate that night, it has also set off a chain reaction of questions like why aren’t all those former Clinton advisors working for Mrs. Clinton?

Answer. Because they refused too! They don’t want to work for Hillary! You won’t hear Senator Clinton laughing about that.

Senator Obama you missed pointing that little item out but hey no one can think of everything.

That’s the reason for advisers in the first place! Now will someone advise Senator Clinton to give up her nails on the chalkboard cackle!