Obama: Weiner should resign

I can tell you that if it were me I would resign, because public service is exactly that, it’s a service to the public. And when you get to the point where because of various personal distractions you can’t serve as effectively has you need to. At a time when people are worried about jobs and their mortgages and paying the bills then you should probably step back.—president Barry Hussein Soetoro

So much for the progressive talking point,'It's only sex" or " It's his private life." According to the head of the Democrat Party, Barry Hussein Soetoro, what Anthony Weiner did was inappropriate. The president also stated that if he were in Weiner's gray underwear he would resign. This makes Weiner's stay in Congress virtually impossible now.

Originally thinking that they could control the messages Democrats first lied about Congressman Anthony Weiner’s online self-pornography by suggesting that his twitter account was hacked. Now that the situation is spinning out of control, because of the Congressman’s prolific shutter-eye, the leader of the Democrat party is sending the message that Weiner should take one for the team by resigning.

This is an attitude that clearly places Democrat politics above the Progressive ideology of the Sexting Congressman and 56 percent of his constituents that say they think Weiner should be able to Sext and legislate just as long as he does a good job in Congress.

Follow is the president's Today show interview where he sent a strong message to the rehabbing Weiner. It won't be long before Weiner resigns now. (see 1:26min video)



Rep. Weiner’sexual indiscretion couldn’t have come at a more inconvenient time for Democrats with the 2012 elections looming. In light of the mismanagement of the Economy, the false promise of jobs via recovery summer (last summer), an unconstitutional health care law and an Illegal Libyan war the president is throwing a fellow progressive under the bus in order to save Democrat’s chances in the 2012 elections.

Document Expert tells FBI Obama COLB is a Fraud

"I have irrefutably proven that the Certificate of Live Birth that President Obama presented to the world on April 27, 2011 is a fraudulently created document put together using the Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator programs."–Doug Vogt, Document-Imaging Expert

Worldnetdaily’s Jerome R. Corsi reports that Douglas Bradley Vogt president of Archive Index Systems Inc a Bellevue, Washington company has filed a complaint with the FBI charging that the document released by the Barry Hussein Soetoro administration is a forgery. (see article)

[Mr. Vogt] claims the long-form birth certificate the White House released April 27 as an electronic document in PDF format was forged from a composite of legitimate birth certificates obtained from the Hawaii DOH archives and manipulated to replace the original authentic information.

Mr. Vogt’s company Archive Index Systems Inc operates in the Web Hosting, Data Storage, Video Streaming industry within the larger category of Web Hosting, Data Storage, Video Streaming. In the U.S. there are 4,549 companies who also provide services in the Web Hosting, Data Storage, and Video Streaming area. Within Washington, where Archive Index Systems Inc is located, there are 101 similar businesses.

Mr. Vogt cites a background in type, typesetting and form design. He cites expertise in document scanning and has developed document imaging software as his credentials.

Below is Mr. Vogt’s May 10, 2011 press release indicting that he has filed charges with the FBI. (see below)


Obamas Cert of Birth_May-10-2011_News Realease

Of course the president’s April 27, 2011 release of his alleged proof of birth was meant to quash all media reporting on the president’s lack of eligibility. Mr. Vogt’s claim is that along with ineligibility the president has compounded his illegitimacy with criminal fraud.

The likelihood anything developing from this effort is minuscule.

Is America as Morality Corrupt as Weiner’s Brooklyn Queens District Suggests

[Democrats will] never get the Speakership back because the people in the rural areas of this country who are Christian conservative culturally - you can say backward if you want - but they don't like this kind of stuff at all. They're not part of that 56 percent in Brooklyn and Queens who say, "okay, we can live with this guy." —Chris Matthews

iv) You are a nation that permits acts of immorality, and you consider them to be pillars of personal freedom. You have continued to sink down this abyss from level to level until incest has spread amongst you, in the face of which neither your sense of honor nor your laws object.

Who can forget your President Clinton's immoral acts committed in the official Oval office? After that, you did not even bring him to account, other than that he 'made a mistake', after which everything passed with no punishment. Is there a worse kind of event for which your name will go down in history and remembered by nations?-–Osama bin Laden, Open letter to American answering the question, 'On what basis are we fighting?’

Al Qaeda’s late head Osama bin Laden blamed America’s immorality as one of the reasons that al Qaeda declared war against America. (see open letter to America)

While no one will argue, the attacks on America are wrong no matter what the justification. I think we all can agree that the American culture has regressed from Victorian Puritan based ethics, which was once embraced, to that of Secular Humanist Hedonism powered by Progressive Liberalism. That Progressive Liberalism is what Racial Islamists hate so much and war against us for, and it is that depravity, which is broadcast worldwide by the dominate controlling popular media.

Anthony Weiner is a part of Progressive Liberalism. He represents it. Progressive Liberalism is the reason Weiner, an Uber-Progressive Liberal Congressman, can twitter his penis over the internet to a young woman and be accepted by 56% of his Brooklyn Queen New York constituents. It is Weiner’s twittered penis that his New York constituents defend. After all 56% percent of his New York district in Queens say that Weiner’s actions represent them, they see no moral irregularity in such behavior. In fact, they approve of it and find in perfectly acceptable. Even got a name for it, Sexting.

In another example of America’s depravity knowing no bounds, Progressive Liberal Commentator Chris Matthew’s takes a page of his fellow Progressive, president Barry Hussein Soetoro, who sees Conservative Americans as bitter clingers. The exact quote is as follows.

You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. […] So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations. –Barry Hussein Soetoro

Likewise MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, sees the religious Conservatives as ‘Rural Area Culturally Backward' Christian Conservatives as he said in this interview with Ben Smith, politico and Chris Cillizza, Washington post. (see 3:10min video)



The problem is, it is the Democrat Leadership that wants Anthony Weiner gone. Weiner represents the blatant immorality that Democrats attempted so hard to hide or project on Republicans in 2008 elections.

Weiner has engaged in all of the Democrat’s ruses; first deny, deny deny. Then blame Republican hackers, admit only when caught, tearfully (as best one can) accept responsibility. Finally when caught and there is nothing left admit oneself into rehab. Weiner has done it all yet he promises not to quit.

If you're a Blue Dog Democrat from a conservative culturally part of the country, where you're fighting out every election with two or three points to spare, if you're a -- if you're are [Jim] Matheson from Utah or you're from Oklahoma and you're a [Dan] Boren -- and he's leaving Congress - your life's getting difficult enough defending the East Coast and the left coast Democratic Party. They're too far left. Look at what happened in Arkansas last year. It's getting very, very hard to defend the behavior, politically, of the [Democrat] party. Now you throw on top of that immoral behavior, indiscrete behavior, embarrassing behavior, gross behavior like [Weiner’s], and you still have him in your midst. And that's my question to you. If you're Steny Hoyer, who does speak for the Blue Dogs, if you're Nancy Pelosi, the former Speaker, who has to deal with them, don't you have to deal with the fact - you're losing any chance of getting back a 218 majority?

I want you to pick this up, Ben. This is, to me, the stakes here. If he stays, they never get the leadership back. [Democrats will] never get the Speakership back because the people in the rural areas of this country who are Christian conservative culturally - you can say backward if you want - but they don't like this kind of stuff at all. They're not part of that 56 percent in Brooklyn and Queens who say, "okay, we can live with this guy." Your thoughts, Ben? Isn't that the cutting edge of this?—Chris Matthews

Congressman Anthony Weiner’s story is that of unbridled Progressive Liberalism. Weiner is what happens when a society throws morality away. When a society demonizes the one element that is a force for righteousness and good by referring to Christianity as rural and backward we produce Anthony Weiner’s and districts that support him.

Depravity only makes the United States weak. Depravity makes a Political Party weak. That is why Democrats have attempted to hide it in their Party and that is why States like New York and California are in fiscal trouble.

Why should Weiner quit? He represents the depravity of 56% of his constituents and he represents 100% of the depravity of the Democrat Party.

Obamacare earn less Money or get a Waiver

Well, hold on a second, George. Here -- here's what's happening. You and I are both paying $900, on average -- our families -- in higher premiums because of uncompensated care. Now what I've said is that if you can't afford health insurance, you certainly shouldn't be punished for that. That's just piling on. If, on the other hand, we're giving tax credits, we've set up an exchange, you are now part of a big pool, we've driven down the costs, we've done everything we can and you actually can afford health insurance, but you've just decided, you know what, I want to take my chances. And then you get hit by a bus and you and I have to pay for the emergency room care —Barry Hussein Soetoro

The president’s main argument for Mandated Healthcare was that it would bring down cost if everyone were forced to buy his healthcare plan. So why has the Soetoro administration granted nearly 1,400 waivers for various portions of the new health care reform law. This Means that not everyone will be forced to buy Obamacare. If this is true, the fact that the president has allowed his cronies to be waivered out of the healthcare law mean that cost will not be lowered for the rest of us. (see 1:27min video)



In addition to that, the Soetoro Solicitor General Neal Kumar Katyal believes that Obamacare is meant to punish the rich. He believes if individuals object to mandated Obamacare they should make less money.

“So it’s a penalty on earning a certain amount of income and self insuring. It’s not just on self-insuring on its own. So I guess one could say, just as the restaurant owner could depart the market in Heart of Atlanta Motel, someone doesn’t need to earn that much income. I think both are kind of fanciful and I think get at…”--Neal Kumar Katyal (source)

This is a list of companies and states that have been given waivers from Obamacare (see list)

The fact that so many have been granted waivers from “Mandated Healthcare” speaks to the utter failure of the concept of mandated healthcare and gives repeal of Obama it’s most forceful argument.

Following are testaments to the sheer Left-wing plutarchy and cronyism that is Obamacare.

According to Michael Barone, National Review Online, May 26, in the 14 months since the Health Care Reform bill known as "Obamacare" was signed in March 2010:
— (So far) 1,372 businesses, state and local governments, labor unions and insurers (covering 3,095,593 individuals) have been granted waivers from Obamacare. Union members have gotten 50.3 percent of the Obamacare waivers.
— Two of the states granted waivers were Nevada and New Hampshire, both states considered crucial in next year’s presidential election.
— In April, 38 waivers were granted to restaurants, nightclubs, spas and hotels in the congressional district of former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. (Her office said she had nothing to do with it.)

Given the above, it is fair to ask: If Obamacare is so great, why do so many people and organizations want out of it? If 1,372 waivers have been granted so far (most of them to organizations supporting President Obama), how many do you think have been denied? (Can anyone say "Chicago politics"?)--Terence McManus (source)

What do we have in Washington -- a president and Congress, or a politburo?

The Democratic establishment in control of the executive branch and Senate are handing out waivers to the new health care law like candy -- in many cases to organizations that enjoy the Democrats' favor.

Consider: Unions have been among the leaders in seeking and receiving permission to opt out of "Obamacare" -- and in April, a whopping 20 percent of the waivers were granted to entities in the district of former Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, one of the chief proponents of the law.

Funny thing, how "need" happens in such geographic clusters!-- Augusta Chronicle Editorial Staff (source)

President Barack Obama and his administration’s willingness to use the extraordinary powers granted under ObamaCare to expand his political power has been on full display in recent weeks. More troubling are new initiatives that seek to hobble his, and the Democratic Party’s political opponents in next year’s elections.

The use of federal programs and regulations to favor allies and punish or intimidate opponents raises serious questions about the president’s commitment to a pillar of our liberty, that all should be treated equally before the law. --Charles Kadlec (source)

If Obamacare is so great, why are its biggest supporters seeking waivers of its costly provisions? And why are Obama backers the primary recipients of the many waivers from Obamacare that have been granted? As Dr. Milton R. Wolf notes,
"seven entire states and 1,372 businesses, unions and other institutions have received waivers from the law. The list includes the administration’s friends and allies and, of course, those who have the best lobbyists. More than 50 percent of the Obamacare waiver beneficiaries are union members, which is striking because union members account for less than 12 percent of the American work force. The same unions that provided more than $120 million to Democrats in the last two elections and, in many cases, openly campaigned in favor of the government takeover of your health care, now celebrate that Obamacare is not their problem. But the political payoffs don’t stop there. The Obama administration didn’t forget its closest friends in the latest round of waivers. Although there are 435 congressional districts across America, nearly 20 percent of the new waivers, amazingly, found their way to a single district -- Mrs. Pelosi's [the liberal former Speaker of the House of Representatives]."

While liberally granting waivers to its allies, the Administration has flouted the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), refusing to respond to FOIA requests about its criteria for waivers or why it has denied waivers to other applicants. It is now being sued in federal court for violating FOIA.-- Hans Bader (source)

So which is it Mr. president, Mandated healthcare for all or waivers from this healthcare mess for your friends and supporters? Any way one looks at it, it’s unfair and it’s failed. Obamacare must be repealed.

Liberals Argue the Bill Clinton Standard regarding Weiner

Two things that I’d never though I see, one is Ed Schultz arguing as the voice of reason in a cause and the other is Bill Clinton used as a standard for morality.

That just goes to show us that anything can transpire when Progressive Liberals argue the case for immorality regarding a fellow Progressive as in the case of Ed Schultz’s interview of Joan Walsh of Ultra Left-wing Salon Magazine, Bill Press and Sally Cone of Movement Vision.org.

Follow is some of the most provocative Liberals abusing Liberals in their confusion over who is to blame for the ongoing downfall of Progressive Liberal star Congressman Weiner. (see 8:50min video)



Amazingly, Ms. Walsh and Mr. Press, staunch partisans, argue that if Bill Clinton can become a Liberal icon in spite of his immoralities then Congressman Weiner be just as immoral and become just as successful.

Does Ms. Walsh and Mr. Press really want to argue that America is so devoid of integrity and morals that a married elected government official can twitter his exposed penis to women that are not his wife while he engages in other lewd and lascivious acts. And just as long as this dishonorable behavior doesn't affect this Progressive Liberal politics this scandalous behavior is acceptable to Progressive Liberals.

Moreover, are Progressives willing to accept dishonorable behavior in their politicians just as long as their politicians prevent honorable men and women of the opposing Party from being elected?

This interview sounded that way to me. How did it sound to you?

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz’s, “These aren’t the Droids you are looking for” Defense

I think Anthony Weiner is dealing with a personal matter and that is where it should be left. —
DNC Chairperson Debbie Wasserman-Schultz

If Jedi mind tricks only work on the weak-minded then so too does Liberal Democrat message discipline as was demonstrated by new Democrat National Committee Chairperson Debbie Wasserman-Schultz . Wasserman-Schultz apparently thinks that by stonewalling the crotch-gate incident, Democrat Congressman Anthony Weiner twitter controversy, she and Democrats can control the narrative and talk about things that they want to talk about. (The Howard Dean Pivot)

Congressman Weiner has been attempting to divert media attention away from his gray skivvies and skinny leg twitter soft-porn pix since hackers hacked into his twitter account and prankishly sent the picture of his “little weiner” to the college co-ed that he was “following.” However the diversions, the blaming "Hackers" was all a lie. The Congressman has admitted that the pictures are pictures of himself. He has also admitted that is was him who sent the pictures himself via twitter.

CNN’s Wolf Blitzer demonstrating some audacity of hope thought that he could get Wasserman-Schultz to weigh in on the “crotch-gate” controversy. But alas, too late. Wasserman-Schultz was already on message and the only reply that Blitzer could elicit from the DNC chair was a droid like, “…what Anthony Weiner is dealing with right now is a personal matter and that’s where it should be left.”

First how dare Wasserman-Schultz tell the public what they should or should not be interested in.

Secondly, so embedded was the prerecorded text in the mind of Wasserman-Schultz that she repeated it drone- like five times under one minute in the Blitzer interview. It was like Debbie “Obi-wan Kenobi”-Schultz was attempting to divert our attention away from R2D2 or C3PO (see 1:24min video)



From this point on, we can expect all Democrats to march in lockstep with the learned by rote orders on Weiner. When asked about Congressman Weiner say the following, “…what Anthony Weiner is dealing with right now is a personal matter and that’s where it should be left.”

Let this be a lesson to Republicans. No matter how serious the offense you don’t have to trash one another when the media is looking to make cannon fodder out of the Trumps, Palins, Ryans and Bachmanns of your party. You should practice the same message discipline that Wasserman-Schultz and Democrats use on the media and their ill-informed constituents.

Of course because ,as the president has intimated, you are the enemy you can’t expect the same free passes as Wasserman-Schultz and Democrats receive when they refuse to answer the media on Democrat scandals. But at least it won’t be your hand stabbing a fellow Republican in the back à la Newt Gingrich’s senseless and unnecessary stab against Paul Ryan.

By the way Debbie when something is tweeted for the world to see that act takes the matter out of the personal domain. Or if Mr. Weiner’s account was hacked that too takes the matter out of the personal and places the alleged hacking into the criminal. Either way a public figure like a Congressman, sending a lewd picture of his “little weiner” via twitter or his twitter account being hacked are both very public matters.

Your insufficiently weak, “These aren’t the Droids you are looking for” defense of Congressman Weiner notwithstanding.

However since the Congressman has confessed to sending those pictures and since he has admitted that he did lie, that makes your defense all the more pathetically partisan.

Democrats will continue to divide this country along racial, sexual and class lines if they are not voted out of office in 2012. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Anthony Weiner are but examples of the radicals that have taken over the Democrat Party.

Barry Hussein Soetoro is Commander-in-chief of the Progressive Liberal Left that has vowed to fundamentally change America from the Constitutional Republic that it is and make it into a Democracy.

If you don't know the difference you are probably a product of public schools. Or some such institution that's goal is to destroy America. Or you are just as unhinged as Debbie Wasserman-Schultz

Weiner: Rude, Lewd and Screwed

Pre-Toby McGwire spider bite Anthony Weiner

After I got over the pre-spider bite Toby McGwire picture of Congressman Anthony Weiner, I suddenly felt sad for America. I thought, ‘has it really come to this America?’ No longer can sensible Americans consider the facts of an event and come to a reasonable and rational conclusion of those facts. We now have to wait for verification of what we should already know to be true from a person who is involved in the event and who it may be in his or her interest to skew the facts. (see story)

This person may or may not be truthful about the events depending upon how much control they have over the evidence. It is fortunate for us that the Congressman did not have complete control of the evidence or we would be debating for years the preposterous notion that some Republican operative hacked into the twitter account of Anthony Weiner and sent pictures meant to defame him.

Yes, it is indeed sad that we cannot as Americans agree on objective facts any longer. Everything is colored by partisanship. We now accept that New York Congressman Anthony Weiner did send the lewd tweet of his gray clod “little weiner” because the congressman confessed under duress of more pictures of like kind coming out and definitely showing the congressman in various poses and in relative degrees of undress working hard for his constituency.

Sadly today if a suspect says he, ‘did not have sex with that woman…Ms. Lewinsky’, there are those partisans among us that will defend to the death the liar even if he still had Ms. Lewinsky’s panties stretched around his head and we had the blue dress with “the evidence” in our possession.

So for you Barbara Walter types who believe that Congressman Weiner took over two hundred pictures and sent them to six other women over the internet for his wife, Huma here is irrefutable proof. And for you types who still believe in Anthropogenic Global Warming even when scientists say that there has not been Global warming since 1998, here is Congressman Weiner admitting that the picture of his “little weiner” is in fact him. And he did send the picture of himself over twitter. (see 1:54min video)



I must admit that watching this whole fiasco unfold was like going through a Seven Step program with Congressman Weiner. As I see it, Weiner has already gone through and is going through the following phases.

1… Denial: He lied that someone hacked his twitter account and he said he didn’t send those pictures.
2… Anger: He blamed everyone for keeping him from doing his job. He called a reporter a jackass.
3… Acceptance: He got wind that hundreds of other lewd pictures that he previous sent where coming out.
4…News Conference: He held a news conference to attempt to get on the front end of the story and put his best media spin on it.
5… Tears of Self pity: You ever been caught doing something wrong and… Yeah those tears
6… Refusal to honorably step down: Yeah he did it all and then some but he ain’t stepping down. Couldn’t you tell by these pictures and this scandal that Weiner has no honor? (Besides only Republicans step down when caught red handed in a scandal).
7… Continuing on as a Compromised husband, Congressman, and colleague from New York: So he’ll continue to represent the people of New York. And every time we see him, we’ll remember those gray “whitey tighties” the skinny leg and we’ll remember that he is a rude, lewd, perverted liar whose last name is Weiner.

If he were a Republican, his career would be over. However, by the standards of Democrat’s ethics he may even consider running for president and win the Democrat presidential nomination.

Tennessee’s Grassroots embrace American’s Religious Heritage

…WHEREAS, throughout America's rich history, both the citizenry and their elected officials alike have deeply respected the Ten Commandments, its profound influence on the formation of American legal thought, and its fundamental place in the history of law and government as a whole…

BE IT RESOLVED by the House of Representatives of the 107th General Assembly of the state of Tennessee, that this body hereby urges all Tennessee counties to allow the Ten Commandments to be posted in their respective courthouses.

The State of Tennessee has passed a resolution following 90percent of its counties, which have already adopted their own resolutions asserting that America, contrary to president Barry Hussein Soetoro’s beliefs, is still a Christian nation and owes its conception and growth to founding Christian principles. The state lawmakers of Tennessee passed a resolution 98-0 that recognizes the Ten Commandments and the Creator as the basis for American government. (see article)

This apparent grassroots rejection of the president’s blatant attempt to mitigate Christian influence in this country is surprising particularly when media and government have combined fundamentally to change the historical record showing the primary role that Christianity has had in the founding of this nation. Current efforts had successfully thwarted any government agency from acknowledging America’s historical relationship with the Ten Commandments.

Worldnetdaily’s Drew Zahn reports that Tennessee’s State Representative Todd Watson, author of the resolution, explains in its text, "It is imperative that these revered tablets continue to grace our public buildings, as reminders to this generation and the next of the vital role the Ten Commandments and its Author have played in shaping our great republic." (Resolution below)

Tennessee Ten Commandment Resolution

I never would have imagined Tennessee at the forefront of what has become Civil War II, the battle between the Right and the Left for the soul of America. Yet a simple resolution that states the historical truth, the Ten Commandments is and always has been a vital part of the American experience, is a push back from the Right to the president and the Progressive Left.

This push back certainly will elicit a declaration of war from the Progressive Left. We will certainly keep our attentions focused on media’s and government’s certain to come lash back at the state of Tennessee as they did to Arizona when Arizona dared to enforce Constitutional immigration policies that the media and government are attempting to fundamentally change.

This could be a strong indication that Tennessee’s 2012 eleven (11) electoral votes will be counted for the Party that best represents the historical Constitutional America.

What is Democrats’ plan to save Medicare?

But the trustees also said just what, a couple of Fridays ago, that this thing could be insolvent in the next decade. Doesn't something really dramatic have to happen, and as the Congressman suggested, the Republicans have a plan. Do the Democrats have a plan? —Harry Smith, Face the Nation

Apparently Democrats’ plan is Medi-scare or Scare-a-care and the pivot! Democrat National Committee Chairperson Debbie Wasserman-Schultz rolled out the Democrat’s “Howard Dean” plan, which is never answer a question and by all means change the subject.

Don’t let them set the agenda…we think we have to answer the question. You don’t ever have to answer the question. You should answer the question that they should have asked, not the one that they did ask you. And the one that they should have asked you is the one you like. We are going to talk about what we want to talk about… Change the subject…Make them talk about what you want to talk about and be relentless.—Howard Dean (see 1:43min video)

Remember Harry Smith asks Debbie Wasserman –Schultz the question, “Do Democrats have a plan[to save Medicare]”. And following is Wasserman—Schultz’s response (see1:34min video)


If one listens very closely at the end of Ms. Wasserman—Schultz ‘s response was the Democrat plan. According to Wasserman-Schultz , Democrat’s plan is to have Joe Biden fix Medicare.
Now that is Medi-scare!!!

Bernadine Dohrn: Barack Obama is a Terrorist

Dohrn: I think you know bombing from the air in order to save people is a terrible idea. It goes bad, people don’t like it.

Interviewer: Is it terrorism?

Dohrn: It usually is terrorism because it’s killing civilian people in large numbers. I think that you can call it you know a message of war to free people but I think that of course you …wars of empire have always been wrapped in the paper and ribbons of democracy and bringing education and freedom to people. It‘s terrorism, when you end up, yes, bombing civilian populations, occupying the land.

Interviewer: To make sure I understand correctly, in this war on terror the U.S. is also a terrorist? Is that what you mean?

Dohrn: That is what I mean.

Former domestic terrorist, wife of William Ayers and president Barry Hussein Soetoro friend Bernadette Dohrn like professor Cornell West seem to have vast philosophical differences with who the president has become. West believes that president Soetoro has became a black mascot of Wall Street oligarchs and a black puppet of corporate plutocrats. And now the president, according to his Liberal critics, has become head of the American killing machine. Furthermore, they believe that the president is proud of that distinction.” (source)In addition, Dohrn believes that Soetoro is a terrorist. (see 3:09min video)



If anyone knows, a terrorist when they see one Bernadette Dohrn should. Dohrn a founder of the Weatherman group, Dohrn was a member of the "Weather Bureau" (name later changed to "Central Committee") is a domestic terrorist. Larry Grathwohl, an FBI informant who was with the Weatherman from autumn 1969 through spring 1970, considered her one of the two top leaders of the organization, along with Bill Ayers.

During this period, the group organized the October 1969 Days of Rage riot in Chicago, which Dohrn led.[20] During the 1970s, the Weathermen bombed federal buildings and police stations.[21] Prior to the March 6, 1970 Greenwich Village townhouse explosion, in which three members of the group were killed as a bomb was being constructed, all members of Weatherman went underground. The group then changed its name to Weather Underground.

Dohrn went underground in early 1970, engaging in bombing activities. (source)

Dohrm believes that U.S. bombings of Libya are acts of terrorism. I believe that without Congressional approval(which Soetoro doesn't have and hasn't sought) president Soetoro is waging an illegal war in Libya. Whether Soetoro’s illegal war is an act of terrorism is something that the American people are going to have to decide.

Weiner in Crotchgate

I was hacked it happens to people, you move on. This is a prank, not a terribly creative one and it’s a distraction. Look you know you’ve got the Republicans who are playing games with the debt limit, you’ve got a Supreme Court Justice whose refusing to recuse himself despite conflicts of interests, you have health care act that is under siege you know this is this is a distraction. —Anthony Weiner

A crotch-shot of male briefed genitals was sent from Congressman’s Anthony Weiner’s twitter account to a young college girl. The congressman said it was a prank. How would he know that…unless…

Furthermore, how does a bulging briefed crotch-shot of male sex organs tweeted from Rep. Anthony Weiner’s twitter account become a Republican problem?

Weiner thinks that it is. He and some are suggesting that Congressman Weiner’s twitter account was hacked and the crotch-shot was sent to distract Congress from doing the work of the people. They're alleging a vast rightwing conspiracy or Republican schoolboys prank no doubt.

In spite of Democrat allegations here’s what we know. Rep. Weiner is conceding that the picture of male genitals was on his account or computer. Rep. Weiner is conceding that the picture of male genitals was in fact sent from his account. In addition, Congressman Weiner’s explanation is that his account was hacked and the picture was sent as a prank.

According to Weiner, we can all move on there’s nothing to see here. Further the congressman wants our attention focused on Republicans not his twitter tweeting pranks habits. (see 3:20min video)

I was hacked it happens to people, you move on. This is a prank, not a terribly creative one and it’s a distraction. Look you know you’ve got the Republicans who are playing games with the debt limit, you’ve got a Supreme Court Justice whose refusing to recuse himself despite conflicts of interests, you have health care act that is under siege you know this is this is a distraction.—Anthony Weiner

If the congressman was hacked by Conservatives of the vast right-wing conspiracy, why doesn’t he call the Capitol Police or the FBI? According to Breitbart.tv CNN's John King asks a great question: "There's one way the congressman could try to put this to rest, and that would be to call the Capitol Police or call the FBI and say, ‘please launch an investigation because I was hacked.' Why hasn't he done that?"

According to CNN’s Dana Bash, Rep. Weiner's office did not respond to that question but informed CNN that the congressman instead has hired a lawyer. (see 1:24min video)

CNN's Dana Bash reports on the latest developments involving the lewd photo sent out on Rep. Anthony Weiner's Twitter account to a young college girl in the Seattle area. She says despite the congressman's claim that his account hand been "hacked" neither the Capitol Police nor the FBI are currently investigating a hacking. Bash says that Weiner's office is "loathe" to treat the episode as anything more than a "prank".

Just so we all understand. a crouch shot of male genitals was sent from Congressman’s Anthony Weiner’s twitter account to a young college girl in Seattle and the best that congressman can claim is that his twitter account was hacked and this was just a prank . so let’s all just move on and focus on the real sexual perverts …the Republicans.

Oh, I get it, to Weiner this whole sorted incident is all like O.J. Simpson looking for the “real killer(s)”

As CNN’s John King says,"Curious."

The real Weiner?

Why was Obama Campaigning in Europe? It’s For Foreign donations stupid!

He’s done it before. In the 2008 American presidential elections, Sen. Barry Hussein Soetoro illegally raised staggering unprecedented amounts of money over the internet for his presidential campaign. He did this because the F.E.C. did not do its job insuring the integrity of the federal elections. Soetoro raised thousands of dollars in foreign money with absolutely no accountability to the F.E.C. (source)

In his recent trip through Ireland, England and Poland the president is revisiting the technique that filled his election coffins with foreign money last election with his second, “people of the world” campaign tour. Foreign moneys will once again improperly influence the U.S. elections. Remember Obama has promised to raise one billion dollars for his reelection campaign. Where is he going to get that kind of money in a down U.S. economy? The answer to that question is why the president was in Europe this past week. (see 2:34min video)



Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugged reported for the 2008 elections that foreign money was influencing our 2008 elections and nothing was being done about it. Other overseas contributors are making multiple small donations ostensibly in their own names over a period of a few days, some under maximum donation allowances, but others aggregating in excess of the maximums when all added up. So while some of the contributions appear legal, others appear clearly over the maximums allowed without greater reporting requirement. (source)

President Barry Hussein Soetoro is not going to get a billion dollars out of the U.S. people, however because there has been no punishment for his past violations of campaign laws. And no regulations have been put in place to prevent a reoccurrence of the 2008 violation of U.S. election laws, with regards to internet fundraising, Obama will use the internet once again to skirt past U.S. election laws right before our very eyes.

That is why the president was in Europe last week. He was once again passively but illegally encouraging foreign influence in the 2012 American elections as he did in 2008. Moreover, as in 2008 there is no controlling legal authority that is going to stop him. The Federal Elections Commission isn’t going to do it. They failed to do it in 2008 and they refuse to do it now.

Just one more instance of what a lawless nation that America has become under the presidency of Barry Hussein Soetoro. Americans are out of work and this president extravagantly is planning to spend a billion dollars to be reelected most of which will be illegally obtained through foreign donations to his campaign by untraceable internet donations.

If you thought, it strange that the president of the United States in the middle of campaigning would schedule a European trip it was strange. Nevertheless, there’s a good reason for it. It’s the Foreign Donations Stupid.

Lisa P. Jackson the most Dangerous Unelected Person in America

Jon Stewart has done Americans a disservice. In a May 19, 2011 interview with Environmental Protection Agency head Lisa P. Jackson Stewart painted a smiley face on the environmental crusader who is in charge of imposing left-wing global warming beliefs on Americans though regulation. Only thing is Stewart presented what seemed to be a harmless reasonable Lisa Jackson.(see 6:19min video)

The truth is Ms. Jackson is a global warming fanatic who makes statements as , “I believe” or “That’s how I interpret“ and based on her beliefs and her interpretations she intends to mandate climate change regulations on Americans. If the founding fathers intended separation of church and state they certainty intend the belief in the religion of global warming to be separated from government also.

However like any religious zealot no amount of reason or scientific proof to the contrary is able to dissuade Ms. Jackson from her blind allegiance to her cause of converting all America to her beliefs and her mission to impose her belief system on Americans by law.

In the follow clips see how Ms. Jackson disregards facts that disprove her beliefs. When confront with facts like there has not been any global warm since 1998 Ms. Jackson ‘s eyes roll and she regurgitates her mind numbing cult induced belief that in spite of the proof that there has not been any scientific proof of the global warming since 1998 she still professes her belief in anthropogenic global warming. (see 31sec video)



(see 4:00mins video) part 1



(see3:51mins video) part 2




(see5:20mins video) part 3



(see4:02mins video) part 4



When faced with evidence that the White house holds the science suspect Ms. Jackson is unperturbed in her belief of Global warming. (see6:35min video)

The Lawless Presidency of Obama

With everything negative said about president Bush’s war efforts, president Bush has been vindicated in every way. First, he has been vindicated by the find of 550 metric tons of "yellowcake" in Iraq. Second, he has been substantiated by the actions of his predecessor Barry Hussein Soetoro. President Soetoro was one of the voices that attacked president Bush. President Soetoro promised to end the war in Iraq and bring troops home when elected. Actually, president Soetoro continued the Iraq war, he has escalated the Afghanistan war and he has started a war with Libya.

It’s exasperating because of Democrat’s destructive partisanship gamesmanship. At the detriment of the American people, Democrats continue to play with America’s security concerns.

How can one forget the incessant hounding that President Bush received because no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq? That is until July 5 2008.

AP News reported July 5 2008 The removal of 550 metric tons of "yellowcake" — the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment — was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam's nuclear legacy. It also brought relief to U.S. and Iraqi authorities who had worried the cache would reach insurgents or smugglers crossing to Iran to aid its nuclear ambitions. Iraq has no nuclear power plants so the only possible reason for having 500 metric tons of “yellowcake” was for WMD’s.

Did the Obama media report this? Not in any discernable way which made the connection between this material being found in Iraq and president Bush’s claim that Saddam Hussein was gathering material for WMDs. The myth still persists that there were no WMDs found in Iraq. This was clearly not the case. (see story)

I have to say that my greatest disappointment with Democrat partisans is how they played around with American’s security while at the same time attempting to discredit president Bush on the war. Democrat partisans called the Iraq war, “Bush’s war” even though the president went to Congress in strict compliance of the war powers act. In both Afghanistan and Iraq president Bush sought after and obtained congressional approval to engage in war activities. (see Afghanistan Congressional Authorization and in the Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq)

Afghanistan

Afghanistan Congressional Authorization

Congressional Resolution Iraq

Congressional Resolution on Iraq
What is so amazing is Sen. Barry Hussein Soetoro was so concerned that president Bush would use the Iraq Resolution to attack Iran that Sen. Soetoro sponsored a bill to prevent such an occurrence. (see below)

Whereas any offensive military action taken by the United States against Iran must be explicitly authorized by Congress: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That nothing in the Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq (Public Law 107-243), any act that serves as the statutory authority for Executive Order 13382 or Executive Order 13224, any resolution previously adopted, or any other provision of law including the terms of Executive Order 13382 or Executive Order 13224 shall be construed to authorize, encourage, or in any way address the use of the Armed Forces of the United States against Iran. Sponsor Sen. Barack Hussein Obama

Clarifying That the Use of Force Against Iran

If the president understands that congress must be consulted before acts of war as demonstrated by his “View Clarifying that the use of Force against Iran” then why has he not consulted congress with his military action in Libya (see here and here)

Thus one can only conclude that based on president Soetoro actions as a Senator, where he sponsored a bill to force president Bush to comply strictly within the war powers act, the president is well aware that he is in violation of the wars power act and is purposely attempting to flaunt the law.

There can be no question that president Soetoro is willfully acting lawlessly regarding his illegal Libyan war. Something that president Bush did not do in any conflict, which he was engaged although Democrats falsely accused him of starting an illegal war.

Outlandish Donna Brazile baseless claim against GOP simply Outrageous

From coast to coast, the GOP is engaged in what appears to be a coordinated, expensive effort to block voters from the polls.--Donna Brazile

Only an irresponsible Black political pundit or a Democrat would make the scurrilous claims Donna Brazile consistently makes against Republicans and still expects to be taken seriously.

If Republican woman are considered stupid Brazile should be considered “Rahm Emanuel ‘F’ing retarded.’”

Brazile’s latest rave against the GOP is code for her hate of White people. Hate rapped insidiously in a charge that White people are attempting to suppress the Black vote. If Brazile and the first Black president Barry Hussein Soetoro had, their way there would be an all out race war in America instead of the 2012 elections. (see source article)

The truth is Democrats have been fermenting racial hatred since they selected Barry Hussein Soetoro as their candidate. In addition, the president has participated in divisive volatile and racial tainted rhetoric throughout his presidency. Barry Hussein Soetoro has done more to divide America than any president in the history of this country.

It is time that Liberals and Democrats cease and desist with the race baiting. Ms. Brazile should be called out on her racist comments, as any White person would be.

When Barry Hussein Soetoro losses in 2012 it won’t be because he’s Black, it will be because he and the Liberal Democrat establishment tried to use their own Racism as high ground as they took Racist sniper shots at White people in this country while pretending to be victims of Racism at the hands of the White man.

The truth is president Soetoro will discover that one can’t hate on White people or any people and expect them to vote you back into power. That tactic worked in 2008 as a result of White guilt. Whites were guilted into voting for the first Black president though he wasn’t qualified. But now that there is a blatant record of distain for White people from Soetoro and his supporters, Soetoro is not going to get a free affirmative action pass just because he’s Black this time around! Not to mention that his anti-American failed Progressive Liberal agenda has been exposed.

Donna Brazile is a Racist who plays the Race card. She is the worst possible Racist she projects her own Racism on others. It seems that Democrats are doing the same these days, which is behavior that is simply outrageous.

Now That’s Racism!

“[Obama is a] black mascot of Wall Street oligarchs and a black puppet of corporate plutocrats. And now he has become head of the American killing machine and is proud of it.” —Professor Cornell West

Is the president ‘a Black Mascot’ and ‘a Black Puppet’ and is he a sell out to the killing machine because he killed Osama bin Laden? In addition, are those charges, in fact, racist charges?

These are the charges leveled at the president by Cornel West, a Princeton University professor and leading black intellectual. Dr. West is harshly criticizing President Obama, a candidate he once supported but now calls “a black mascot” and “a black puppet” in a recent interview with truthdig.com (see source)

With the Obama, media turning over every rock and looking beneath every shrub for Racism 1 would think they would race to pick the low hanging fruit that professor West offers. And they will eventually. (see story)

Had a White person remotely hinted that the president was simply the black face for Wall Street, Corporate America and the Western Industrialized Military Complex, a 24-hour news barrage equaling the combined forces of hurricanes Rita, Katrina and the tsunami that recently destroyed part of Japan would hound him or her.

That White person would have been swept away on a tidal wave of oblivion. A tidal wave which career and reputation would be spewed out over vast fouled beaches of unemployment.

Alas, Professor West is a Black man. So as Black on Black crime has historically been overlooked in America, the media will not report on a Black man calling another Black man the N-word or calling him a Sell-out or calling him an Uncle Tom or any of the pejoratives that are usually reserved for inter-racial confrontations. Professor West’s complaints will go largely unnoticed by the Brian Williams Katie Couric News media that made the Affirmative Action first Black president possible.

Professor West’s grievance is largely that Barry Hussein Soetoro is a sell-out and Uncle Tom to the people who voted for him. Professor West says that he will neither vote for Soetoro in 2012 nor will he recommend that anyone vote for Soetoro. Dr. West believes Soetoro has become a trader to his self-avowed race.

“And even at this moment, when the empire is in deep decline, the culture is in deep decay, the political system is broken, where nearly everyone is up for sale, you say all I have is the subversive memory of those who came before, personal integrity, trying to live a decent life, and a willingness to live and die for the love of folk who are catching hell. This means civil disobedience, going to jail, supporting progressive forums of social unrest if they in fact awaken the conscience, whatever conscience is left, of the nation. And that’s where I find myself now.”—Professor Cornell West

According to professor West president, Soetoro has betrayed his race and his progressive liberal ideology for the power of the White man.

“I was thinking maybe he has at least some progressive populist instincts that could become more manifest after the cautious policies of being a senator and working with [Sen. Joe] Lieberman as his mentor,” he says. “But it became very clear when I looked at the neoliberal economic team. The first announcement of Summers and Geithner I went ballistic. I said, ‘Oh, my God, I have really been misled at a very deep level.’”—Professor Cornell West

To Dr. West Barry Hussein Soetoro has a Machiavellian tendency, which over-rides any sense of decency, loyalty, courtesy and respect for any other cause or persons than that of gaining power for himself.

“What it said to me on a personal level was that brother Barack Obama had no sense of gratitude, no sense of loyalty, no sense of even courtesy, [no] sense of decency, just to say thank you. Is this the kind of manipulative, Machiavellian orientation we ought to get used to? That was on a personal level.”—Professor Cornell West

Dr. West also believes that president Soetoro is perpetrating on his claim that he is a Black man. According to Dr. West president Soetoro is afraid of real Black men similar to his grandmother who the president once said was afraid of Black men.

“I think my dear brother Barack Obama has a certain fear of free black men,” West says. “It’s understandable. As a young brother who grows up in a white context, brilliant African father, he’s always had to fear being a white man with black skin. All he has known culturally is white. He is just as human as I am, but that is his cultural formation. When he meets an independent black brother, it is frightening. And that’s true for a white brother. When you get a white brother who meets a free, independent black man, they got to be mature to really embrace fully what the brother is saying to them. It’s a tension, given the history. It can be overcome. Obama, coming out of Kansas influence, white, loving grandparents, coming out of Hawaii and Indonesia, when he meets these independent black folk who have a history of slavery, Jim Crow, Jane Crow and so on, he is very apprehensive. He has a certain rootlessness, a deracination. It is understandable.—Professor Cornell West

Professor West is so distraught by the president’s fake Black populism that he does the unimaginable and praises the Tea Party for pointing out that the government under Soetoro is corrupt. Conversely one senses that professor West blames the government for corrupting the president as he comes to gasp with Soetoro own corruption.

The tea party folk are right when they say the government is corrupt. It is corrupt. Big business and banks have taken over government and corrupted it in deep ways.—Professor Cornell West

Finally, Dr. West sees Barry Hussein Soetoro as he is not as he projects himself to be. For seeing, this and attempting to warn others Professor Cornell West will pay an exacting toll. Just as any Republican would when the Obama Media sets out to destroy them Dr. West will be set upon by the Obama media and then relegated to the enemies list that heretofore was reserved for Obama political foes.

“We have got to attempt to tell the truth, and that truth is painful,” he says. “It is a truth that is against the thick lies of the mainstream. In telling that truth we become so maladjusted to the prevailing injustice that the Democratic Party, more and more, is not just milquetoast and spineless, as it was before, but thoroughly complicitous with some of the worst things in the American empire. I don’t think in good conscience I could tell anybody to vote for Obama.—Professor Cornell West

The truth is president Barry Hussein Soetoro’s self-styled form of democracy is counter to the Constitutional Republic that is America. That is what Professor West has learned and that is what the professor is attempting to warn America about.
God save professor West. He’s going to need God’s protection from what lies ahead at the hands of Democrats.

Democrats Happy Gas Prices are High

I’m kinda happy that gas prices are going up in one sense. It’ll force us into thinking about changing the culture, to create more emphasis on mass transportation from the local on up to the federal level —Obama supporter Kaukauna, Wisconsin

The president should campaign on high gas prices. Liberals and Democrats are happy that gas is $4 a gallon because they want “investments” in alternative energy solutions, or so they have been saying. Even president Barry Hussein Soetoro has said it. So why doesn’t the president just go all in on high energy prices and claim them as a good thing for America? (see 2:12min video)



Well we all know that the president didn’t end the Iraq war in fact he escalated the Afghanistan war and started a new conflict in Libya and perhaps that why he hasn’t started his plans for low cost alternative energy.

Either that or the fact that Liberals have been a little inconsistent on high gases prices if you remember under Bush high gas prices were ruinous to the country but under president Barry Hussein Soetoro high gas prices are a blessing.

Don Smith walks us though the hypocrisy over gas prices that Democrats have displayed through the Bush years up until now. (see 4:20min video)



The point here is Liberals can’t seem to make up their minds whether high gas prices are good or are bad. I think it has something to do with what ideology is in control of this country. If Liberals are in control Liberals tend to think high gas prices are a good thing. If Conservatives are in control Liberals tend to think high gas prices are a bad thing.

I’m being to think that Liberals really aren’t making a lot of sense on the subject of energy. After all most of the Liberal’s emphasis for green energy and alternative fuels is based in the debunked theory of anthropogenic global warming, the belief that man-made carbons are polluting the atmosphere thereby trapping heat in the atmosphere and causing unprecedented rises in earth’s temperature.

Ergo a false premise can only lead to false solutions. Which leads to false claims,which leads to false policy and which leads to general confused Liberals as they discuss high gas prices. (see 2:10min video)



And then there is the out right biased reporting of the media. High gas prices bad under president Bush. High gas prices not mentioned under president Barry Hussein Soetoro. (see 3:47min video



Make one wonder do Liberal secretly what this country to fail?

To Obama Transparency is Opaqueness

I think that there are discussions even about transparency and developing rules about transparency that we need to be able to have quietly and behind closed doors–Daniel Gordon

WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, and IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH—1984

"I will also hold myself, as president, to a new standard of openness." - President Barry Hussein Soetoro

We already know that Closing Guantanamo Bay prison is keeping Guantanamo Bay prison open, to president Barry Hussein Soetoro. We also know that Ending the war in Iraq is continuing the war in Iraq, escalating the war in Afghanistan and staring a war with Libya to the president. Therefore, it is of little surprise that Transparency is Opaqueness to the president. (see 2:36min video)



The president is preparing to sign an executive order that would give the federal government the power to punish or reward government contractors based on which Party and what causes that they support. Nevertheless, what the president is calling this executive order is transparency or disclosure of political spending by government contractors. (see Executive Draft)

Executive Draft Disclosure of Political Spending By Government Contractors

Like everything with Democrats what is—is not really, what it seems. There is always an underlying and insidious motive the, “we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.” Sure Democrats say that an executive order the president is floating is about transparency but there is this history with Democrats, which establishes that this executive order is more about political favoritism rather than transparency. (see articles here and here)

Following Congressman Darrell Issa’s oversight committee attempts to address the reality that the president’s proposed executive order would produce. (see 6:14min video)



With the blatant politicizing of everything the Barry Hussein Soetoro administration leaves very little room for trust. There is a warranted and healthly mistrusted of the Soetoro administration concerning this Executive Order. There is also a mistrust of the entire Soetoro agenda.

Saying Food Stamps is Racists

Dog-whistle politics, also known as the use of code words, is a term for a type of political campaigning or speechmaking which employs coded language that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has a different or more specific meaning for a targeted subgroup of the audience. The term is invariably pejorative, and is used to refer both to messages with an intentional subtext, and those where the existence or intent of a secondary meaning is disputed. The term is an analogy to dog whistles, which are built in such a way that the high-frequency whistle is heard by dogs, but appears silent to human hearing. --Wikipedia

Dog-whistle or code words are words that only an exclusive group of people understands. Liberals police speech by labeling words hate speech and then they doggedly sniff out every sentence phrase and paragraph in politics, hounding out any perceived or so-called vestige of racist rhetoric in the public sector that Republicans might use.

For instance, this recent “Meet the Press” interview Newt Gingrich made the point that Barry Hussein Soetoro policies are responsible for putting unprecedented numbers of Americans on food stamps. Liberal show host Dave Gregory’s response? Food stamps? Why that’s a racist code word. (see 1:13min video)



Mr. Gingrich is absolutely correct the bizarre desire of Liberals to twist and contort every word, sentence, phrase or paragraph into a racist epithet is outrageously preposterous.
Since Barry Hussein Soetoro has been president every criticism no matter how true or how warranted is consider racist by Soetoro defenders.

Like the, “It’s Bush’s fault” card the “Racism” card is over played. Whenever it is heard, Republicans have permission to disregard it in the same manner as Mr. Gingrich did. And please, plenty of righteous indignation is warranted!

Will Obama use Osama as much as he used Bush?

Here’s some fun. We all know how the president loves to blame that “other administration” for all of his troubles. He’s probably has underlined and in red in this campaign playbook if all else faults blame Bush!

Nevertheless, what if he changes that to a little end zone dancing and spiking of the football? What if Soetoro changes blaming Bush with touting that he was the president that did what Bush couldn’t do? Moreover, what if president Soetoro replaced his Bush blame rhetoric with, “I killed Osama bin Laden, “in every campaign speech?

Fortunately, SNL gives us a look at what that might look like. (see 5:03min video)



Hilarious! Not much of a president but a hell of a campaigner and a namedropper.
Go Obama killed Osama, go Obama killed Osama!

I’m thinking had Bush did this he would have received international rebuke as a unilateral cowboy and war criminal. They would be calling for his trial at the World Court at the Hague and would be attempting to arrest him on sight and frog march him directly to the Hague. The Media would have bombarded Bush with questions whether its legal to assassinate a world figure criminal or not. They’d be after Dick Chaney too.

I guess Obama wouldn’t get that type of hate because he’s black. That kind of hate is only reserved for the White man.

Go Obama killed Osama, go Obama killed Osama!