A Voice for the 2nd Amendment

“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."--Benjamin Franklin

Henson Ong an American Citizen and a Legal immigrant expresses what many so-called American citizens have apparently forgotten. (see 5:10min video)

Talk of Jobs conspicuous by its Absence

Where is all of that high-falutin talk of Jobs, where is the president’s jobs council, and where is the president poetic rhetoric about solar, wind and air?

Absent from the market square of ideas that’s where they are. Replacing them are the absurdities that will only further weaken an already fragile U.S. economy.

What are the topics that presently consume the media and the government today? Think about it, I’ll give you a moment. Time’s up! Okay if you said advancing Homosexuality, if you said an unconstitutional assault against the 2nd amendment, if you said granting 40 million illegal foreign nationals amnesty and U.S. citizenship, if you said implementing more usurious taxes on the rich (and everyone else) and if you said implementing new bogus and costly federal regulations under the guise of Climate Change you would be absolutely correct.

What is not being discussed by media or government is the fact that the current administration has done nothing on the topic of jobs. If you recalled the president promised to make jobs his number one priority. He stated emphatically that neither he nor his administration would rest until they solved the jobs problem in America. He made such promises in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012 but in 2013 not so much.

This president and this media have pivoted to an all out full frontal assault on the American people and their constitution. With a radical hard left manifesto to fundamentally change the United States into the economic mess that Greece and Spain are. This president has only focused on social issues and only those that divide us. Yet no one has had the temerity to ask the question, “ Mr. President what about the good green shovel ready jobs that you promised America?”

I don’t relish being the bearer of bad tidings America but the fact of the matter is there are no “good” jobs and there will be no “good” jobs in the near future according to a new report published by Richard Vedder, Christopher Denhart, and Jonathan Robe entitled “Why are Recent College Graduates Underemployed?” (see below)

Why are Recent College Graduates Underemployed? by

This Report highlights the following:

• About 48 percent of employed U.S. college graduates are in jobs that the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) suggests requires less than a four-year college education. Eleven percent of employed college graduates are in occupations requiring more than a high-school diploma but less than a bachelor’s, and 37 percent are in occupations requiring no more than a high-school diploma;

• The proportion of overeducated workers in occupations appears to have grown substantially; in 1970, fewer than one percent of taxi drivers and two percent of firefighters had college degrees, while now more than 15 percent do in both jobs;

• About five million college graduates are in jobs the BLS says require less than a high-school education;

• Comparing average college and high-school earnings is highly misleading as a guide for vocational success, given high college-dropout rates and the fact that overproduction of college graduates lowers recent graduate earnings relative to those graduating earlier;

• Not all colleges are equal: Typical graduates of elite private schools make more than graduates of flagship state universities, but those graduates do much better than those attending relatively non-selective institutions;

• Not all majors are equal: Engineering and economics graduates, for example, typically earn almost double what social work and education graduates receive by mid-career;

• Past and projected future growth in college enrollments and the number of graduates exceeds the actual or projected growth in high-skilled jobs, explaining the development of the underemployment problem and its probable worsening in future years;

• Rising college costs and perceived declines in economic benefits may well lead to declining enrollments and market share for traditional schools and the development of new methods of certifying occupation competence.

No one is talking about jobs America. Granting amnesty to 40 million citizens of Mexico and Latin America will only exacerbate the strain on an already hopeless job market. All the other talk of guns, homosexuality and climate change is just white noise to prevent you from thinking about our failed leadership and the real crisis this country faces.

Where is all of that high-falutin talk of Jobs, where is the president’s jobs council, and where is the president poetic rhetoric about solar, wind and air?

Absent from the market square of ideas that’s where they are. Replacing them are the absurdities that will only further weaken an already fragile U.S. economy.

Source of report and statistics:

What difference does it make at this point?

With all due respect, the fact is, we had four dead Americans–was it because of a protest or because of guys out for a walk one night and decided to go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator.

Now honestly, I will do my best to answer your questions about this but the fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information. The I.C. has a process, I understand, going with the other committees to explain how these talking points came out. But, you know, to be clear, it is, from my perspective, less important today, looking backwards—Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State

What difference at this point does it make? At what point Ms. Clinton? Oh, you mean the point, which you and the Obama administration stalled out the investigation into the deaths of Ambassador Chris Stevens, Glen Doherty, Sean Smith and Tyrone Woods. That point?

First, stalling until after the reelection of Barry Hussein Soetoro? Or do you mean after the point of your alleged “fall and concussion” dragging out your testimony over weeks. Was it your intentions to run the clock out on Benghazi making any question regarding the tragic events stale dated, irrelevant and moot?

The fact is the administration had real time Intel and seven hours to react to the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya however someone in the White house decided against attempting to save the lives of Americans that is the point.

The difference is Ms. Clinton the American people care about who left four Americans to die in Benghazi and apparently, no one in the Democrat Party, The White house or the State Department under your authority does. (see 2:09min video)



The fact is the Soetoro administration lied to the American people repeatedly telling Americans that the attack on the American Consulate was caused because of an Internet video. The administration knew all along and at the beginning, that it was a terrorist attack.

We all know what happened Ms. Clinton. Americans were left to die in Benghazi by the Soetoro administration. What difference does this make at this point? Apparently, none Ms Clinton, four American died while the White house stood idly by and did nothing.

It doesn’t matter why the Consulate was attacked what matters is why the Soetoro administration decided not to respond to the attack. Ms. Clinton’s appearance before the House committee did not produce the answer that question.

Ms. Clinton’s appearance was a smoke screen meant to give the look of answering the question without actually answering the questions of Benghazi.

Why didn’t the Soetoro administration go to the aid of Americans? Ms. Clinton’s answer… At this point what difference does it make?

The president was reelected, Hillary Clinton assumed blame but will receive any consequences and mid-managers were fired as scapegoats instead of the president and Ms. Clinton facing the blame for their incompetency.

To answer your question Ms. Clinton, apparently it makes no damn difference at all, no difference at all.

Obama's Second Inaugural Address: Unity through Duplicity

In Orwellian worldview, Peace is War. It is the same in this president’s doublethink language. Unity is war against the GOP

Words mean something. The only problem is getting people to agree to their meaning. According to the American Bar Association, there were 1,116, 967 licensed attorneys in June of 2006. The number rose to 1,128,729 by the end of 2006, and grew to 1,143,358 by the end of 2007. Number of lawyers for each state in those years can be found on "Lawyers By State" on the ABA Website.

Attorneys spend a significant amount of time massaging words and meaning into duplicitous bifurcated forks in the road that lead either to confusion or to improbability. Rarely does an attorney use words to lead to truth. Ultimately, words are tools used to persuade to an attorney’s point of view not for pursue of truth.

That is why I prefer most anyone other than an attorney for President.

This opinion may seem a bit overbroad, and forgive me if you are the exception to the paradigm. You may be someone who uses your skills of persuasion to champion truth. However even you must admit that you were taught to argue both sides of an argument whether right or wrong.

In fact right or wrong does not exist for must attorneys. For many attorneys all things are relative or as each one perceive his or her understanding of what is real.

In our litigious society, all is relative. Nothing is, as it seems. A simple constitutional matter such as governmental mandated healthcare, unconstitutional on its face can be declared both unconstitutional and constitutional according to Chief Justice John Roberts and made the law of the land in a surreal judgment that all but guaranteed the reelection of Barry Hussein Soetoro.

Which brings me to my point, the president in this inauguration speech spoke of unity. In fact he quoted the Declaration of Independence, “"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."”

He continued, “Today we continue a never-ending journey, to bridge the meaning of those words with the realities of our time. For history tells us that while these truths may be self-evident, they have never been self-executing;”

Thereafter the president laid forth an agenda not for all Americans but the same agenda that he and his fellow progressives attempted to push forward in this first four years as president. And though in his second inaugural address he cloaked his Partisanship with the “royal we” throughout the speech he was really speaking to his Progressive base as reported by Tom Curry of MSNBC (see article).

Peter Baker of the NYTimes reports that the President was laying out a Liberal vision for America. (see article)

Michael Kinsley of Bloomberg describes the President’s speech as giving a Liberal’s definition of Rights (see article)

And David Corn of Mother Jones saw the president’s speech as a direct appeal to his sycophants to help him move his agenda this second term (see article)

To the uninformed or to the already Liberal minded person what they heard was a call for unity. However, to others the president’s speech was an in-yo-face promise to jam the rest of the Progressive agenda down the throats of dissenting Americans who do not share the same values or vision was Barry Hussein Soetoro and the Progressive Left.

Even at his moment of swearing on Lincoln’s bible President Soetoro became the anti-Lincoln. In president Lincoln's, second inaugural Lincoln sought to bind the wounds of our nation at the end of a divisive Civil War. President Lincoln said, “One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war.” He further remarked, “Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away.”

“Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether."

“With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.”

In contrast, President Soetoro inaugural address was a call to his Progressive constituents for a continuation if not an escalation of the Progressive ideological war against Conservatism and the GOP. This would be the equivalent of Lincoln calling on the North to completely destroy the South.(see full address)

This is the attitude that the president will promote over the next four years as he advances the ideologies of the Left, Global Warming, redistribution, homosexuality, illegal aliens voting in U.S. elections, voter fraud and voiding first and second amendment rights.

All of this he will attempt to do duplicitously as he speaks of unity just as he did in his first four years. He may well succeed this time because the majority of Americans do not understand that what the president says means something totally different to him than it does to them.

In Orwellian worldview, Peace is War. It is the same in this president’s doublethink language. Unity is war against the GOP (see previous post)

Democrats use Jedi Mind Tricks on the American People Regarding Guns

He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security—Benjamin Franklin

The American people are perhaps the most manipulated people in the world. Corporations spend billions upon billions of dollars a year telling Americans what to think, what to eat, what to wear, etc.

Corporations use words, ideas and images as if they were rapid-fire bullets shot from assault rifles. Corporations target and hunt children, adolescents and adults as if we are deer in open season.

I don’t have to tell you that! You see the commercials every day. You go to the movies that are social conditioning centers, which transmit the latest social values to the unsuspecting moviegoer.

Therefore, it isn’t surprising that our politicians have picked up on the secret of how to get the American people to buy into any political propaganda they might use as if it is the gospel truth.

Case in point, do you really think that the recent discussion about eviscerating the 2nd amendment of the Constitution of the Untied States of America is about saving children?

Did you see the children that the president shielded himself with in a well thought-out visual message meant to convey the idea that he wasn’t really single-handedly pre-empting the Constitution by executive order. No what he was really doing is making it safer for our children.

The many acts that our president employs are stagecraft. They are methods they are tricks to persuade you to buy into your own enslavement. If you will willingly lay down your resistance to governmental tyranny or if you will compliantly accept unconstitutional acts from your elected representatives then where will be no need to restrain you physically. Yet!

To best describe what the president and Democrats are doing I refer to George Lucus’ Star Wars. The Characters of the Jedi Knights use a thought control devise which was based on suggestion.

The Knight would suggest an idea to a likely candidate and the unsuspecting low brow would mindlessly comply with the Jedi’s thought suggestion. Much like we see coming from the White house and media today.

The White house makes a statement the media unquestioningly repeats it and the sycophants and supporters of the Democrat Party mindlessly pick up such transmissions or statements as truth.

It’s like, “These aren’t the droids you are looking for.” When the droids or fact are indeed the ones we are looking for and they are stand right there in our faces. Nevertheless, because of the suggestion to the contrary we fail to see the droids.

And it's not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.—Barry Hussein Soetoro

Now to make this crystal clear. When the president was first running for office in 2008 he, describe a segment of American working-class voters in Pennsylvania and the Midwest as “bitter clingers” people who had lost all hope in government and had only their religion and guns to cling. This is the reason that the president wants to separate Americans from their guns. He wants Americans dependent on Government and less free. (listen 1:39min clip)



So how best does a tyrannical government pry guns and religion from the hands of these “bitter clingers”? Democrats believe the answer is that they enact laws designed to do what is normally not done. For instance in the Patient’s Affordable Health Care law Democrats added conditions that violate some Americans’ religious principles. Thereby forcing Americans to choose between their faiths or to accept the law.

In addition, Democrats are creating conflict within the society by weakening parts of the Constitution, which they disagree by selective enforcement or non-enforcement. Also,they use instances of gun violence as these instances occur in our society to promote a false notion that the 2nd amendment needs to be repealed or in the very least fixed. (see 23 executive orders regarding guns)

23 Executive Orders Regarding Violating the 2nd Amendment by

This proposed disarmament and /or regulation of the American people is exactly the wrong thing to do. The founding fathers realized the corrupting affect of government would eventually manifest in America. Government corruption is happening or has happened in every other government known to man. They also knew that the only way to protect American people from a government that would attempt to enslave them is to have the right to keep and bear arms and they believe that right should not be infringed upon or “regulated”.

Yet Democrats tell Americans they are proposing gun control measures not to violate the Constitution but rather to protect the American people from gun violence.

That brings me back to founding father Benjamin Franklin who said, “He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security.”

Democrats would have Americans willingly give up the Constitutional right to protect themselves be it from gangs, robbers or a tyrannical government.

This is the Jedi mind trick; “You really don’t need to protect yourselves from a government that is operating outside of the Constitution” is the suggestion to the weak-minded sycophants of the Democrat Party.

The Government then signs executive orders to strip the American people of their God given and Constitutional enumerated right to keep and bear arms. The sycophants applaud on cue and repeat the Gov. Andrew Cuomo rant, “No one needs 10 bullets to kill a deer!” That statement Governor is a non sequitur.

The Constitutional right to keep and bear arms un-infringed has absolutely nothing to do with hunting. However, it has everything to do with freedom. That is what this national discussion is about, freedom. It is not about false measures or laws that will not prevent gun violence or save one child. Moreover, this discussion is not about hunting.

Controlling America’s guns is about an agenda to change the Constitution by popular consensus rather than by the legislative process. The legislative process is the only legal way outlined within the Constitution for change not executive order and not popular consensus.

The current discussion of “Gun Control” is designed to trick your mind into thinking that the government is saving children when in fact the opposite is occurring. Actually, government is striping the children of their right to live free under a Constitution.

These are the facts you are looking for. Please disregard the Government Jedi mind trick on guns!

Why Conservatives and Republicans are hated By Liberals and Democrats

Simply stated Liberals hate Conservatives for what Conservatives represent. The stable home life, do your homework, pick up after yourself mentality. Whereas Liberals self identify with “others” who make the Parent group look kind of square, kind of old and out dated.

You’ve seen dramatizations of rebellious teens conflicting with parents who have worked hard to provide a home, food and a constructive environment for their offspring. Some of you are probably experiencing such a family crisis now.

The teen most often is conflicted between values that his or her parents attempt to teach and values, which the teen has picked up from outside influences such as friends, the media, teachers, etc.

Wanting to be accepted by those who are outside of the familiar sphere the teen often lashes out at the people who care about them the most, their parents. This causes what might be described as the “generation gap.” The so-called “gap” is the wall erected by a teen who is now attempting to cut off family influences so that he or she many appear to be like friends, media, teachers and the rest of those who represent pop culture or popular influences.

If one were to apply this logic to Conservatives and Liberals, the parallels might surprise you if you haven’t thought about it before. In the “Beaver Cleaver” 1950’s and back, everyone in the United States was “Conservative.” Over all America was religiously conservative. I refer to this as the Parent group.

In the late 50’s into the 1960’s there started a cultural revolution. The young begin to reject the parent group and split off from Conservative values. While Conservatism remained stationary this splitter group moved left. I call this new movement “Liberals.” The Adolescent group.

What we see in today’s politics is the logical conclusion of adolescents rejecting parents. If you’ve ever heard an adolescent scream, I hate you, I hate you, I hate you, to a parent and if you understand what is behind that immature sentiment, then you know what the dynamic between today’s Liberals and Conservatives is.

Simply stated Liberals hate Conservatives for what Conservatives represent. The stable home life, do your homework, pick up after yourself mentality. Whereas Liberals self identify with “others” who make the Parent group look kind of square, kind of old and out dated.

Liberals or the adolescent group self identify with anyone other than the parent group. For example in a resent sale of his Channel One broadcast cable network Progressive Liberal and inventor of Global warming Al Gore had a choice to sell his network to either Conservative up and coming cable TV entrepreneur Glenn Beck or Sharia Law promoter and Islamic Owned cable TV network al Jazeera. (see story)

Gore chose al Jazeera. He claimed al Jazeera was more philosophically aligned with him than America loving, American born and raised Conservative Glenn Beck. Al Jazeera is owned by the Saudis who represent Big Oil and world domination through Islam. Gore is more aligned with big oil and Islam than a Conservative American patriot? (see story)

Might I note that Glenn Beck supports American values and the preservation of America. Again Beck is “Conservative.” Whereas al Jazeera is promoting the total worldwide Arab domination of the religion of Islam and Sharia Law.

Al Gore’s Liberal Progressivism or his allegiance to the adolescent group would have him align himself with the enemies of freedom rather than help the purveyors of freedom and American values protect America. This is simply astonishing!

This hate of Conservatives is manifested in the president and the Left. They are radicalized to the point that they would see America destroyed rather than see Conservatives maintain American values for all posterity.

The vehement vitriol seen spewing forth from the Left is the same anger that adolescents display when they are enraged because their parents insist that family values are more important than being like those influences outside of the parent group.

That said I attribute the partisanship demonstrated in our politics today as a direct result of the Left rejecting Conservativism and moving to extreme Leftwing positions. So extreme in fact that Al Gore would sell an American network to enemies of America who are avowed to destroy America and establish suppressive Islamic Sharia Law worldwide.

Continued: Obama and Democrats want to impose UN Gun Control on America

Last post I explained Democrats current effort to, “never let a good crisis go to waste” this effort is currently known as the “Gun Crisis.” I believe the Democrats’ effort is part and parcel of a broader United Nations initiative to regulate small arms globally. (see previous post)

The President supports the UN effort. He did not want you to know but now that the tragic Sandy Hook elementary massacre has created the opportunity of “crisis” Democrats are using the emotional value of Sandy Hook to attack the 2nd amendment.

Fundamentally changing the constitution is what the President promised he would do if given the chance. And this “crisis” lends itself to the anti-Constitutionalists that abhor both the 1st and the 2nd amendments.

As promised last post following are the Documents which show the United Nations’ efforts to supersede laws of sovereign nations by implementing global gun regulation. Also you will find letters from both Democrats and Republicans addressing the President’s support of the UN’s efforts and warning him against violating the U.S. Constitution.

UN CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM & STRENGTHENING OF LEGAL INSTITUTIONS MEASURES TO REGULATE FIREARMS

UN Justice Reform & Strengthening of Legal Institutions Measures to Regulate Firearms by

DEMOCRAT LETTER RE: 2ND AMENDMENT

Democrat Letter to President Obama rejecting WH plans to support UN measures requiring Gun Control by

REPUBLICAN LETTER RE: 2ND AMENDMENT

Republican Letter to the President re: 2nd Amendment Rights by

UN REPORT OF THE SECRETARY GENERAL ON SMALL ARMS

UN Report of the Secretary General on Small Arms by

UNODA FACTSHEET ON GLOBAL GUN REGULATION

UNODA Factsheet on Global Gun Regulation by

UN is behind Gun Control like they're behind Climate Change

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety—Benjamin Franklin

You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before —Rahm Emanuel

They’re back! Like huge global poltergeists the UN is the spirit behind the newest U.S. crisis “Gun Control.”

If one remembers, the UN was and is the force behind the other world-wide crisis “Global warming.” Global warming or its more acceptable upgrade “Climate Change” is a plot and ploy to control and regulate carbon emissions globally.

One thing that is for certain the UN is for global control without representation. In other words the United Nations is attempting to be world government at the expense of the United States Constitution or as equally important, at the expense of any sovereign country’s right to govern itself as it’s people see fit.

With respect to the man-made crisis of gun control we now see playing out in media and in Washington D.C. we are witnessing the Rahm Emanuel dictum of never let a crisis go to waste.

What I mean is the president has been a supporter of gun control since his Illinois State Senate days. In addition he has supported the 2007 UN treaty on regulating small arms but could not publicly support it until he won the 2012 election.

Now that the elections are over and in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre the president feels at ease to let his true intentions be known.

Fortunely for him he can lead where he’s most comfortable, from behind, as the media and his political allies stoke the passions of the hard Left creating crisis to do what normally would not be permitted to do. And that is the president that the hard Left intent to enact the most draconian unconstitutional gun control measures in the history of the United States of America.

This effort will coincide with the UN measure to regulate small arms world-wide and voilà! There you have it a Global ban on guns, all guns. Of course Democrats will say that they are simply regulating munitions and arms for the safety of the citizens of the United States however as one of our founders once said, “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

Wild conjuncture or speculation on my part, let’s see!

Twelve Democratic senators have joined 45 Republicans in a fast growing movement to halt progress on an Obama-backed United Nations effort that could bring international gun control into the United States and slap America's gun owners with severe restrictions. (reported in Washington Whispers)

Forbes magazine reports:

While the terms have yet to be made public, if passed by the U.N. and ratified by our Senate, it will almost certainly force the U.S. to:

1. Enact tougher licensing requirements, creating additional bureaucratic red tape for legal firearms ownership.

2. Confiscate and destroy all “unauthorized” civilian firearms (exempting those owned by our government of course).

3. Ban the trade, sale and private ownership of all semi-automatic weapons (any that have magazines even though they still operate in the same one trigger pull – one single “bang” manner as revolvers, a simple fact the ant-gun media never seem to grasp).

4. Create an international gun registry, clearly setting the stage for full-scale gun confiscation.

In short, overriding our national sovereignty, and in the process, providing license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights. (Forbes)

The United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA)

The UN a Global force for preempting national sovereignty (UNODA)
United Nations treaty that is supported by Obama would undermine U.S. Sovereignty Global Gun Control

More proof Obama and the hard Left supports gun global gun control UN Treaty has Obama Support

US Lawmakers are against the international UN treaty for now but they’ve been turned in the past. They can’t be trusted. (Congress against)

Democrats doing what they do best. Using Crisis to govern

Next the Treaty and related documents:

Conservativism The Last Life Boat for America

The bottom line is Democrats won the presidential election by tapping into the lowest element of the American people, the debased, deluded and the Narcissists among us.

58% of Americans say that America is headed in the wrong direction according to a current Rasmussen poll. (see report)

Nothing new. Americans have been feeling that way for a long time. A year prior to the 2012 presidential elections 73% of Americans thought that the county was headed in the wrong direction. (see Politico).

Also around the same time a Washington Post poll suggests that Americans disapprove of what is transpiring in their country (see WP poll)

Yet with all of that, uncertainly the President was reelected. How is that explained?

I think I know. Psychiatrist Keith Ablow believes that a new analysis of the American Freshman Survey, which has accumulated data for the past 47 years indicates that America as produced a generation of deluded Narcissists (see article)

Who has been in control of America’s Education, Media and Politics for the last oh fifty years? Why the Liberal Progressives have. From K-12 to Undergrad to PhD degree Liberal progressive ideology has been the dominate force in our education, our media and our politics.

If Americans are deluded, Narcissists Liberal Progressives are responsible. Case in point, Jon Ward’s assessment in the Huffington Post entitled “Republican Party Path Back From 2012 Elections Require Shift in Culture, Not just Tactics” (see article)

Ward describes Democrats as in touch with the deluded Narcissists who reelected the president and Republicans not in touch and needing to learn how to get in touch.

Of course, Mr. Ward would not agree with my assessment of what he said in his article but that is exactly what he meant! (He wouldn’t agree what that statement either!)

The bottom line is Democrats won the presidential election by tapping into the lowest element of the American people, the debased, deluded and the Narcissists among us. America is the Titanic it has hit an iceberg of delusion and Narcissism if Psychiatrist Keith Ablow is believed. The last lifeboat floating is Conservativism.

Delusional Narcissists wish to destroy Conservativism because Conservativism turns the light of truth on their madness. That is why Liberal Progressives are demanding that the very last lifeboat, Conservativism, be turned so that it will ram into the same iceberg that is sinking an already disabled delusional Narcissist America.

Conservatives should resist because as 58% of Americans know America is headed in the wrong direction. America has crashed into the iceberg of delusion and Narcissism and is sinking fast. Conservatism is the last best hope for America, no the World!

Sandy Hook thought police

To be fair before a single six-year-old or a high school student is suspended or expelled for drawing a gun on paper, writing about a gun, pointing a finger like a gun shouldn’t all violent content be removed from elementary, secondary and college campuses in America? That would only be fair.

What should be done to a 6-year-old who points his finger at someone and says pow? (see article)

What should be done to a teen who upon reflection writes a poem about the mass murders of Sandy Hook school in Connecticut? In her ruminations, she suggests that she can understand why mass murderer Adam Lanza would make the awful choices that he made.

For thinking in-depth about a tragedy that happened in Newtown, Connecticut 17-year-old San Francisco high school senior, Courtni Webb was suspended and is facing “possible expulsion from school. (see article) (see 1:41min video)



Our society stands at the start of an era of Orwellian “Thought Control.” It has crept up upon us on little cat’s feet. No one could have told Americans 40 years ago that we would one day be repressing student’s thoughts rather than educating students about subjects and events around him or her, yet we are doing the unthinkable now.

American Educators have fought so hard in the last 40 years to allow such concepts as homosexuality to take root in the spirits and psyche of American’s children. They have done this in the spirit that everything is relative or acceptable so why is the mere thought of using a gun reviled by the same people who virtually teach unfettered sexuality as if there are no consequences to wrong sexual choices.

The 6-year-old, who attends Roscoe R. Nix Elementary School in Silver Spring, made a gun with his hands, pointed it at another student and said "pow," according to Robin Ficker, the boy's attorney. He was given a one-day suspension, with a conference on the matter planned for Jan. 2, the day students return to school from winter break.—Matt Connelly

Today in some minds, a child cannot point a finger, write a poem or hold a pencil in the likeness of a gun. Gun ownership is not illegal on the contrary gun ownership by citizens is a Constitutional right. The first amendment says, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Look up the word “infringed” sometime you may be surprised it means unobstructed in any way.

Therefore, one would think that Educators would understand that Zero tolerance with respect to guns theoretically violates the spirit of Constitutional law. If not they should understand at the very least that suppressing language and thought on any subject is fundamentally at the heart of what tyrannous depot dictatorships do.

In the 60’s and 70’s the Left made it their business to push the envelope where controversial subject matter was concerned. Lenny Bruce, Richard Pryor and George Carlin said things that challenged establishment belief systems.

The 60’s and 70’s where eras of radical social change in all aspects of human understanding. However, now that Liberal Progressive thought dominates the culture and Liberal Progressive values are in full control Liberals in turn are attempting to close the door behind them. In other words, Liberals are attempting to repress thoughts and ideas they disagree with.

If this had happened to them in the 60’s and 70’s sexual, promiscuity and Liberal Progressivism would not be established today. Nor would these concepts be unofficially promoted today by Educators while gun ownership is demonized.

Yet it is even worst. The very thought of a gun is punishable by suspension or expulsion or both. We see such instances in newspaper daily. So effectively, a child’s education can be terminated if he or she thinks of a gun. A child can think about pornography, gang banging, sexual promiscuity or homosexuality, all they desire, just don’t think of a gun.

The hypocrisy cries out against Educators from the Society’s hyper violent Movies, hyper violent video games and hyper violent and misogynistic Music.

Are schools presently allowing violent Movies to be played on campus? Do they allow violent and misogynistic music to be listened to on campus? Do they have books in their libraries that make mention of violence and picture guns on their pages. Do undergrads spend hours playing violent video games on campus?

To be fair before a single six-year-old or a high school student is suspended or expelled for drawing a gun on paper, writing about a gun, pointing a finger like a gun shouldn’t all violent content be removed from elementary, secondary and college campuses in America? That would only be fair.

If you say no, movies, video games and music should not be banned “Zero tolerance” from schools then why are you allowing the same unjust thought control to be acted out against innocent school children who write the word gun or point a finger? These children not only think about all our societies social ills that movies, video games and music represent but they also think about a first amendment right which is not morally or legally wrong to think about, write about or mimic.

Mass murder by any means is repugnant. However, what is even more repulsive to the American idea is to violate rights that are guaranteed in the Constitution. And among those rights are freedom of speech and the right, which says, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

If you are a decision maker in a school you might think about those two fundamental rights before you suspend, expel or falsely detain a student because he or she pointed a finger and made the sound pow.

If that action falls under your zero tolerance policy then so does books and film in your library as well as student’s talking about the latest video game or newest movie or song.

To be fair you must rid your libraries of all content with the word gun written therein or that has any pictures of a gun. All magazines and films must be examined and if guilt of showing a gun or referring to one you must destroy it. Just as you did with all the books that use the word Nigger.

Then if a child is heard speaking about a song, game or movie with violent content that student or students must be suspend and or expelled.

In the name of Zero tolerance you must do all of the above to be consistent of course. Or some parent may see your blaring inconsistency and hypocrisies and then sue you and your school for violations of Constitutional rights and equal protection under the law.

As the litigious society, that we are it could happen. No, believe me it will happen.

Filmmaker Oliver Stone acknowledges that America is under Orwellian Rule

Oliver Stone and Peter Kuznick belong to the Liberal Democrat Progressive mind trust. They say president Barry Hussein Soetoro is ushering in an era of repressive government tyranny not yet seen in the United States of America.

Since 1998, this blog has been attempting to alert you dear reader of the dangers of Orwellian Worldview as it has been employed against the people of the United States of America. I am somewhat saddened that it has taken notables in the film and entertainment industry this long to see this reality. However, it is just now that some on the Left are catching on to the fact that there are tyrannous overtones in the way that the U.S. government is choosing to function under a Liberal Progressive administration.

Filmmaker Oliver Stone is one such person who has come to the realization that we are no longer living as free people in America. Americans, according to Stone and his collaborator Historian Peter Kuznick, now realize that the American people are just as imprisoned today as the Japanese were when they were rounded up and interned in America during WWII. (see article)

You also cover Pearl Harbor, which of course led to the internment of Japanese American citizens. I do not think a lot of people acknowledge that once again underreported aspect of really what that meant. When you look at the surveillance grid in America today it almost seems like it is an open-air internment camp, where they do not need to intern people anymore because we have this grid set up in place. What do you guys think about that?—Russian Times

Liberals have done great harm to the United States of America due to their untethering of the United States from it’s traditional Democratic Republic Constitutional moorings with their Liberal Progressive ideologies (see 14:48min video)



Democrats have successfully polarized politics so much so that the average Democrat or Liberal Progressive will not listen to truth. They will only give credence to views coming from their fellow Liberal Democrat Progressives.

Oliver Stone and Peter Kuznick belong to the Liberal Democrat Progressive mind trust. They say president Barry Hussein Soetoro is ushering in an era of repressive government tyranny not yet seen in the United States of America.

They say there is no comparison in American annuals to what this president is doing. Soetoro is unprecedented as a president not only in skin color but also by anti-American, anti-Constitutional ideology.

These are not Conservative men so how can you or anyone blindly disregard their warnings. Have we become so Partisan that we no longer can be objective?

Yes and we can thank Al Gore for that! (see previous post)

White men can’t Jump or Deal if they belong to the GOP

Senate minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Speaker of the House John Boehner

Apparently, the saying is true White men can’t jump. Rather than calling the president’s bluff concerning going over the fiscal cliff the GOP let it be known that they prefer not to jump. However what they also revealed is they cannot negotiate or deal with Liberal Progressive Democrats either.

Senate minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Speaker of the House John Boehner are go-along-to get-along (GATGA) elected Republican representatives. In other words, as it has been for years, there is a certain self-hating element in the Republican Party that agrees more with Liberal Democrats than they agree with Conservative Republicans and Conservative Americans.

The above description is hardly the worst I can say about Misters McConnell and Boehner but I’ll just let actions speak for these two political Neanderthals and you decide if I’m correct in my assessments.

In 2008, Conservative Americans sent Representatives to the Congressional House to stop Obamatax, government run-away spending and higher taxes. What the Washington establishment did, through the establishment Republicans or as I have named them the GATGA Republicans, was immediately dub the people’s Conservative Representatives “Tea Party” Representatives in a move to both ostracize and contain the Conservative movement.

However, what is most frustrating is how GATGA Republicans “got played” concerning the “Fiscal Cliff” and “Debt Ceiling” manufactured crisis. Yes that’s correct I said manufactured crisis.

The Senate-White House compromise grudgingly passed by the House is a Beltway classic: The biggest tax increase in 20 years in return for spending increases, and all spun for political purposes as a "tax cut for the middle class." But taxes on the middle class were only going up on January 1 because the politicians had set it up that way, manufacturing a fake crisis. The politicians now portray themselves as scrambling heroically to save the day by sparing the middle class while raising taxes on small business, investors and the affluent.—The WSJ

According to the WSJ Republican leadership has signed on to the biggest tax increases in 20 years in return for spending increases, and all spun for political purposes as a "tax cut for the middle class." But taxes on the middle class were only going up on January 1 because the politicians had set it up that way, manufacturing a fake crisis. (see article)

In other words, GATGA Republicans allowed and are complicit in what Liberal Progressive Democrats, the President, the Senate and the Media, falsified as protections for the “middle class” when in actuality they intended all along to raise taxes on everyone. And yes that means taxes are being raised on the middle class in the form of payroll taxes and other surtaxes.

Again, taxes are being raised on everyone while the president will be permitted to keep up the facade that he is fighting for the middle class and that he didn’t increase taxes on this group of taxpayers.

According to Sophie Quinton of the National Journal, The payroll tax cut won’t be extended for another year, meaning that working Americans will see their paychecks reduced in 2013. (see article)

Although Ms. Quinton couched the tax increase on the middle class in “Good News” it is nevertheless a tax increase one which employers are already defending themselves telling employees not to blame them when paychecks are less due to the payroll tax increase that Democrats allowed to expire.

Yes, I can remember the promise that the president made now about Obamatax he said not one cent of your taxes would be raised if it were passed. Well taxes will be raised because of Justice John Roberts' and president Soetoro’s healthcare taxes and these are only the beginning of the vast array of taxes that will be rolled out on the middle class starting in 2013.

Coming soon, Carbon taxes!

Lawless

How would you like to be judge at your own trial? Or how would you like to grade your own exam? That is exactly what the State Department has done.

Here’s something to contemplate. How does that person who wears that, “I’m with stupid” tee-shirt with the finger pointing right get someone to first put on the “I’m stupid” tee-shirt and then get that person to stand at the IWS shirt wearer’s right?

I’m asking this because at this point I’m ready to stand on Bill Maher’s left with my I’m with stupid tee on. Why, because if you can picture the scenario just mentioned my tee-shirt’s finger is point at him right about now because I find myself agreeing with something Maher says repeatedly.

Bill Maher has called the American people stupid several times and in this instance I am incline to agree with him.

You see Barry Hussein Soetoro’s administration has done an investigation on the murders of the U.S. ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens and the three members of his staff; Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone S. Woods and what they have concluded only stupid people would accept as true.

The mandatory State Department internal inquiry into the deadly Sept. 11 terror attack on a U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya, slams bureaucrats for “grossly inadequate” security but says that poor leadership could not be punished under department regulations.—Shaun Waterman

The recently released State Department internal inquiry failed to name who gave the stand down order that prevented armed forces from dispatching to protect Americans and American property. This finding must be quid pro quo for Hillary Clinton’s concussion and inability to testify before the Congressional hearing on Benghazi. (see stories here, here and here)

How would you like to be judge at your own trial? Or how would you like to grade your own exam? That is exactly what the State Department has done.

If Americans weren’t so stupid, we would have seen this coming. How so you ask? This is the same self investigative strategy that Barry Hussein Soetoro used when protecting himself from allegations that he was attempt to sell his vacated Senate seat when he was elected president. (see here, here and here)

In both instances, Mr. Soetoro was perfectly absolved of any relations to the scandal that would have engulfed a White Republican presidential candidate or a White president.

President Soetoro seems to remain hermetically sealed from the fetid stench of corruption that invades every space he goes. Such a feat is a tribute to the Chicago masterminds on which shoulders his lawless presidency stands.

However, what is most striking is the acceptance of such an obviously political partisan report by the media. That instance alone is indicative of media’s complicity in this lawless self-evaluating government as well.

It just occurred to me if you are reading this the world hasn't ended yet. Maybe there is still hope for us yet.

It’s not Gun Control it’s Control of Liberals that is Needed

If the plan is to pass a gun law and believe that will fix what is wrong with America, it won’t. If America is going to be fixed, we must look at the right causes for what ails us.

It’s not gun control that is going to fix America. What is going to fix America is regaining American values, love of the Country, the Constitution and the rule of law.

Forgive me if I do not easily fall into lock step with the anti second amendment furor that is besieging the national media and their allies the left wing Democrats of the government.

I just don’t think this is the right time for citizens to be disarming themselves with the most radical president in the history of the United States granting himself new executive powers. He and his personally appointed government agencies, EPA, DOJ, HLS, IRS and others bypass Congress, when he deems it necessary, putting them well on their way to implementing a fundamentally transformed America.

Now they have set their sights on the second amendment. And believe me there will be Gun Control legislation, that is a given. There will be a new gun law passed that is also enviable. What is also true is none of it is going to amount to any less violence and none of this is going to stop mass murder from occurring.

The new legislation will do nothing to save a single life. Fact is we already have more than enough gun control laws and not one of them did anything to save the children and adults of Sandy Hook.

What all the brouhaha about Gun Control is is diversion from America’s real problem. America’s real problem is that we are rotting slowly. We are unraveling. That putrid smell is the smell of the corpse of American values and morals, which have been tortured to death by forty years of incessant devaluation of Conservative values.

The passage of Marijuana usage laws and the passage of homosexual “pretend marriage” laws signal that this society no longer knows right from wrong.

No amount of gun regulation will teach young men that it is not okay to shoot up schoolchildren. There is something deeper needed than the new morals that are conveyed in music videos, movies and Liberal ideology.

Our society has unfurled. It is tattered at the edges much like the damaged flag, which was recovered from the World trade Center after the attack of 9/11.

As we progress toward the total deconstruction of Conservatism let it be forever known that the cost of such folly was the innocent lives of the children of Sandy Hook, the lives students of Columbine, the lives of movie goers of Aurora Colorado.

I believe the recent acts of mass murders plaguing our country were caused because we have become a valueless country. We have left behind the values that once made this country great.

If the plan is to pass a gun law and believe that will fix what is wrong with America, it won’t. If America is going to be fixed, we must look at the right causes for what ails us. It’s not gun control that is going to fix America. What is going to fix America is regaining American values, love of the Country, the Constitution and the rule of law.

Fainting Benghazi

Regardless of her duties to the United States, Secretary of State Clinton is feeling a little faint and cannot report to work until after the Benghazi hearings are over.

Much after!

After seeing the results of what lying for President Barry Hussein Soetoro did to Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice Secretary of State Hillary Clinton got light headed fainted bumped her head and concussed at the thought that she would have to do the very same thing if she appeared before a Senate committee regarding what happened in Benghazi, Libya. Now she will not appear on a doctor’s excuse. Seems like another in a long secession of missed 3 a.m. calls regarding U.S. deaths in Benghazi for the president and for Ms. Clinton! (see story and here)

Yet, Hillary is no stranger to lying. She lied for Bill Clinton knowing that he was lying about his Oval Office tryst with blue dress clad Monica Lewinsky (related post). She lied about what she know about real estate deals in a matter called White water (related post), she lied about why White house employees were fired in the post office scandal, she lied about being fired upon when her airplane was flying over Bosnia ( related post). Plus she's already lied about Benghazi along with everyone else. She said as well that the attack on the U.S. consulate was caused by the internet Youtube video.

Hillary Clinton has left an Ocean spray of lies in her political wake. What is different this time is her name is being circulated as the 2016 presidential front-runner. Therefore she can ill afford to do a second stand by your man like she did with Bill Clinton by getting involved in president Soetoro’s messy 9/11 murder of four Americans that Benghazi has became.

Hillary has decided to stand on the sidelines this time and let the president stand on this own. Again, Clinton has already told the same lies that Susan Rice told about Benghazi and thus far she's gotten away with it. She sees no need to put those lies on the record.

That would be a foolish thing to do for the 2016 frontrunner for the presidency don’t you think?

Regardless of her duties to the United States, Secretary of State Clinton is feeling a little faint and cannot report to work until after the Benghazi hearings are over.

Much after!

Comprehensive Hurricane Sandy Relief

"You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that it’s an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before."—Rahm Emanuel, former President Soetoro chief of staff

Democrats love to do things comprehensively. This means they make a relatively uncomplicated problem, such as addressing the country’s healthcare needs, intricately complex. They create a monstrous and Orwellian 906-page Law, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act plus it’s 55-page companion the, “Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010”, into a law that does not protect patients nor is it affordable.

What this combined 961-page behemoth does is complicate Health Care in the United States so much, that you and me will never know everything that is in it. It allows Democrats to hide tremendous amounts of greed, corruption and malfeasance among its many pages. Nobody actually reads the law and nobody is the wiser.

Another thing that Democrats love to do is create crisis. This is done so they can do things that are not normally permitted. You remember former President Barry Hussein Soetoro’s chief of staff and now mayor of Chicago Rahm Emanuel’s remarks on the subject of Democrat governance by crisis. (see 08sec video)



Crisis governance is standard operational procedure for Democrats. So in a perfect storm of combining comprehension and crisis the Soetoro administration has submitted a $60-billion emergency aid package for victims of superstorm Sandy. (see story)

No one is against giving aid to the victims of hurricane Sandy but why must Democrats use this opportunity to spend money that the American people do not have on things that are unrelated to servicing the immediate needs of the hurricane victims?

Contained within the Comprehensive $60 billion dollar request for emergency aid are non emergency funding such as millions for the Smithsonian, millions for the space center and millions for forest that have nothing to do with emergency aid to Sandy victims (see spending request below)

• $23 million for tree plantings to “help reduce flood effects, protect water sources, decrease soil erosion and improve wildlife habitat” in forested areas touched by Sandy

• $2 million to repair roof damage at Smithsonian buildings in Washington that pre-dates the storm

• $4 million to repair sand berms and dunes at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida

• $41 million for clean-up and repairs at eight military bases along the storm’s path including Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

• $4 million to the FBI to replace “vehicles, laboratory and office equipment and furniture

• $2.4 million to Customs and Border Protection to replace “destroyed or damaged vehicles, including mobile X-Ray machines.”

• $50 million for the Small Business Administration for its post-storm response efforts, including “Small Business Development Centers and Women’s Business Development Centers

• $13 billion for “mitigation projects” to prepare for future storms

Democrats and president Soetoro often blamed president Bush for out of control spending, spending by the way that has been dwarfed by Bush’s successor, yet Democrats always warred against president Bush loading his request to fund the wars, which Democrats approved with extraneous spending sometimes call pork spending. They did this to president Bush each time he attempted to fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and then they, especially now president Soetoro, accused Bush of spending recklessly when he pass bills laden with Democrat pork to fund the wars.

In one such instance the government spending watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense combed over a comprehensive 1,500-page war funding bill that was made public late night. Taxpayers for Common Sense said it identified almost 9,000 earmarks worth $7.4 billion. Those earmarks tacked on to requested to fund the wars, $40 billion for the war in Iraq and $30 billion for troops in Afghanistan.

In another separate Bush request for funding the wars the Democrat controlled Senate tacked on the following:

• $96 billion for military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and anti-terrorism programs, including $600 million for explosives-detection systems at airports

• $6.7 billion for disaster relief along the Gulf Coast, including $1.3 billion for rebuilding levees

• $4.2 billion for agricultural aid, including $1.6 billion for livestock producers and 74 million for peanut storage

• $1.8 billion for veterans programs, including $454 million for medical services

• $820 million for low-income heating assistance

• $500 million for fighting wildfires

• $425 million for security at rural schools

Source: Senate Appropriations Committee

Though pork barrel spending is nothing new in Washington the practice is so well hidden Democrats never receive the blame that they so rightly deserve for practices that put America on the road to fiscal insolvency.

Democrats are in control of the White house and the Senate and they continue to use crisis and comprehensive measures to hide the fact that they are over spending even in the shadow of the fiscal cliff.

Democrats should stop this abuse of spending. Yes, help the victims of hurricane Sandy but no more. We don’t have the money. Moreover, Democrat Comprehensive spending has put the entire country at risk.

When did we become High School U.S.A.?

I was thinking we’ve just reelected a president of the United States based primarily on likability and popularity and this weird thought came to mind. I’d like to share it with you now…

Oh my god! Like we just reelected the president because he was popular and stuff. Nobody wanted Romney to win because… just look at him he’s so boring! He reminds me of the boring ASB president we had back in High school when I was the Homecoming King.

And they’re saying that we should vote for Hillary in 2016 because of women’s rights and historical stuff like that. OMG! I could just scream!

This talk about the money drop thing…oh yeah the fiscal cliff is peeving me off cause the president won and stuff, so they should give him what he wants like new king powers or something. Yeah and they should raise the debt roof… or debt ceiling (whatever!) and the president should be able to spend as much as he wants. It’s not like we can’t print more money and stuff!

And oh my god, oh my god I haven’t had a job in four years so they better not let the Republicans cut off welfare or unemployment or kill babies (or whatever they do) or I’m going to go nuts.

President Obama is so cool! Did you see how he just flies around on air force one campaigning for the last two and a half years tellin everyone how mean and out of touch, those Republicans are.

And it really don’t matter who runs for office I’m never going to vote for a Republican because all they want to do is put a buzz kill everything. We should enjoy ourselves in America while we can. Nobody wants to save and cut spending. I know I don’t!

The President is cool he goes on the Late Night show with David Letterman and he hangs out with Jon Stewart on the Daily show and I think that’s cool. Cause that's where I get my news. There and 60 minutes and TMZ! You know Jay-zee and Beyonce threw him party just before election to get out the vote. It was cool!

The president can identify with me cause he used to smoke weed too and he likes to party. After the election, he’s going on a 20-day Hawaiian holiday costing 4 million dollars he ought to have a lotta fun body surfin and eating shaved ice. I’d have fun too if I was president and if I had the money. Right now, I can’t pay all my bills on unemployment.

If I were president I’d build, a skateboarding park right on the White house grounds and invite some buddies over for a day of skating and partying. Woo-who!

Yeah if I were president, I’d have so much fun I wouldn’t have time for that boring stuff like attacks on American whatyamacallits… oh yeah Consulates, American Consulates. I’d let the people who work for me take the blam..do the work.

If I were president, I’d make that Boner guy… oh yeah Boehner guy do whatever I tell him and he’d do it too! And if I’d wanted to, I’d skateboard right off of the fiscal cliff and blame the Republicans cause ain’t no body listening to them anyhow.

Republicans remind me of those stupid teachers I had in high school always trying to tell somebody what to do and what to learn when they didn’t know anything about me or my life. All that Math, English and History stuff was just a waste of time. Nobody uses that stuff in real life anyways. I know I don’t!

And I really don’t care who runs for president next time as long as they ain’t White, male and Republican cause they suck!

Oh, my god Republicans suck big time and Democrats rule!

It has occurred to me that the president won 50.3% of the popular vote. If what is written above is the way over 50% of our voting countrymen and women are processing now, it may not be out of the question that Snooki could one day be the next president of the United States of America…

I’m just sayin!

Democrats to the American People Let Them Eat Tax Increases

This all coming from a man who said September 2008, “I can make a firm pledge under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.”

Not since Marie Antoinette was attributed to have sparked the French Revolution with the words, “Let them eat cake!” has a leader and his Party had such a callous opinion of the people, which they rule.

"Qu'ils mangent de la brioche!" supposedly spoken by the Queen upon learning that the peasants had no bread. Since brioche was enriched with butter and eggs, as opposed to ordinary bread, the quote supposedly would reflect the Queen’s obliviousness to the condition of the people.

This phrase came to be attributed to Marie Antoinette as her unpopularity increased in the final years before the outbreak of the French Revolution. During her marriage to Louis XVI, her perceived frivolousness and her very real extravagance were often cited as factors that only worsened France's dire financial straits.

In fact, many anti-monarchists were so convinced that it was Marie Antoinette who had single-handedly ruined France's finances that they nicknamed her Madame Déficit. –excerpted from Wikipedia

Democrats and their Leader president Barry Hussein Soetoro came into office in 2009 when America was borrowing heavily to pay it’s debts. It was also a time when America faced grave deficits. The president said as much himself. At the very start of his presidency Mr. Soetoro said America is out of money and American was at that time running deep deficits! (see 2:10min video)



Fiscal insolvency and huge deficits being the case, instead of attempting to reverse America’s economic plight Democrats and the President went on the greatest spending spree in the history of our nation. The president ran up trillion dollars on top of trillions of dollars of borrowed money deficits each year of his presidency thus dwarfing any economic failures that he might have inherited from the previous administration.

In fact the president’s unwillingness to curb spending has created the urgency we now face. Americans are tasked with the impossible as we attempt to figure out just how to pay for Democrats' and the president's trillions upon trillions of dollars of spent on government programs, bureaucracy, foreign money give-aways and entitlements. Those are the facts.

What is also true is had the president kept his 2008 election promises to cut the deficit in half, stopping government spending, there would be no Fiscal Cliff and no looming economic Armageddon. (see Had Obama Kept his Campaign Promises)

So how is all this government spending going to be paid for? It isn’t. First Democrats are going to get John Boehner their Republican colleagues to raise the debt limit, which means more spending. That's right, you read right! More spending! Then Democrats John Boehner and their Republican friends are going to raise taxes on all Americans, not just the Rich, as has been the false meme of the president and his Party. Raising taxes on the “Rich” is just a ploy to get all Americans acclimated to the idea of taxes getting raised. You don’t believe me.

Maybe you’ll believe former DNC Chairman, Democrat Presidential candidate and rabid Democrat Partisan Howard Dean. In a recent MSNBC interview, Dean confessed that the president’s “Tax the Rich” scheme still will not generate enough money in taxes to support Democrats’ unsustainable spending. Therefore everyone's taxes will have to be increased. (see 55sec video)



This is the “Let them eat tax increases” mentality that is prevalent among Democrats. Everyone forced to pay more taxes to support the out of control spending of the last four years that Democrat Progressivism has wrought on America. This not mentioning the projected spending that is to come in the next four years because of a Soetoro 2nd term.

What is coming is an avalanche of taxes headed the way of the American people, middle class Americans included. The tax increases so dubbed the fiscal cliff are as follows:

Since taking office three years ago, President Barack Obama has signed into law twenty-one new or higher taxes on the American people due to come into full play in January2013 and after the 2012 election is completed:

1. A 156 percent increase in the federal excise tax on tobacco: On February 4, 2009, just sixteen days into his Administration, Obama signed into law a 156 percent increase in the federal excise tax on tobacco, a hike of 61 cents per pack. The median income of smokers is just over $36,000 per year.

2. Obamacare Individual Mandate Excise Tax (takes effect in Jan 2014): Starting in 2014, anyone not buying “qualifying” health insurance must pay an income surtax

3. Obamacare Employer Mandate Tax (takes effect Jan. 2014): If an employer does not offer health coverage, and at least one employee qualifies for a health tax credit, the employer must pay an additional non-deductible tax of $2000 for all full-time employees. Applies to all employers with 50 or more employees. If any employee actually receives coverage through the exchange, the penalty on the employer for that employee rises to $3000. If the employer requires a waiting period to enroll in coverage of 30-60 days, there is a $400 tax per employee ($600 if the period is 60 days or longer). Bill: PPACA; Page: 345-346

Combined score of individual and employer mandate tax penalty: $65 billion/10 years

4. Obamacare Surtax on Investment Income (Tax hike of $123 billion/takes effect Jan. 2013): Creation of a new, 3.8 percent surtax on investment income earned in households making at least $250,000 ($200,000 single).

5. Obamacare Excise Tax on Comprehensive Health Insurance Plans (Tax hike of $32 bil/takes effect Jan. 2018): Starting in 2018, new 40 percent excise tax on “Cadillac” health insurance plans ($10,200 single/$27,500 family). Higher threshold ($11,500 single/$29,450 family) for early retirees and high-risk professions. CPI +1 percentage point indexed. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,941-1,956

6. Obamacare Hike in Medicare Payroll Tax (Tax hike of $86.8 bil/takes effect Jan. 2013)

7. Obamacare Medicine Cabinet Tax (Tax hike of $5 bil/took effect Jan. 2011): Americans are no longer able to use health savings account (HSA), flexible spending account (FSA), or health reimbursement (HRA) pre-tax dollars to purchase non-prescription, over-the-counter medicines (except insulin). Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,957-1,959

8. Obamacare HSA Withdrawal Tax Hike (Tax hike of $1.4 bil/took effect Jan. 2011): Increases additional tax on non-medical early withdrawals from an HSA from 10 to 20 percent, disadvantaging them relative to IRAs and other tax-advantaged accounts, which remain at 10 percent. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,959

9. Obamacare Flexible Spending Account Cap – aka, “Special Needs Kids Tax” (Tax hike of $13 bil/takes effect Jan. 2013): Imposes cap on FSAs of $2500 (currently unlimited). Indexed to inflation after 2013. There is one group of FSA owners for whom this new cap will be particularly cruel and onerous: parents of special needs children. There are thousands of families with special needs children in the United States, and many of them use FSAs to pay for special needs education. Tuition rates at one leading school that teaches special needs children in Washington, D.C. (National Child Research Center) can easily exceed $14,000 per year. Under tax rules, FSA dollars can be used to pay for this type of special needs education. Bill: PPACA; Page: 2,388-2,389

10. Obamacare Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers (Tax hike of $20 bil/takes effect Jan. 2013): Medical device manufacturers employ 360,000 people in 6000 plants across the country. This law imposes a new 2.3% excise tax. Exempts items retailing for <$100. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,980-1,986

11. Obamacare "Haircut" for Medical Itemized Deduction from 7.5% to 10% of AGI (Tax hike of $15.2 bil/takes effect Jan. 2013): Currently, those facing high medical expenses are allowed a deduction for medical expenses to the extent that those expenses exceed 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income (AGI). The new provision imposes a threshold of 10 percent of AGI. Waived for 65+ taxpayers in 2013-2016 only. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,994-1,995

12. Obamacare Tax on Indoor Tanning Services (Tax hike of $2.7 billion/took effect July 2010): New 10 percent excise tax on Americans using indoor tanning salons. Bill: PPACA; Page: 2,397-2,399

13. Obamacare elimination of tax deduction for employer-provided retirement Rx drug coverage in coordination with Medicare Part D (Tax hike of $4.5 bil/takes effect Jan. 2013) Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,994

14. Obamacare Blue Cross/Blue Shield Tax Hike (Tax hike of $0.4 bil/took effect Jan. 1 2010): The special tax deduction in current law for Blue Cross/Blue Shield companies would only be allowed if 85 percent or more of premium revenues are spent on clinical services. Bill: PPACA; Page: 2,004

15. Obamacare Excise Tax on Charitable Hospitals (Min$/took effect immediately): $50,000 per hospital if they fail to meet new "community health assessment needs," "financial assistance," and "billing and collection" rules set by HHS. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,961-1,971

16. Obamacare Tax on Innovator Drug Companies (Tax hike of $22.2 bil/took effect Jan. 2010): $2.3 billion annual tax on the industry imposed relative to share of sales made that year. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,971-1,980

17. Obamacare Tax on Health Insurers (Tax hike of $60.1 bil/takes effect Jan. 2014): Annual tax on the industry imposed relative to health insurance premiums collected that year. Phases in gradually until 2018. Fully-imposed on firms with $50 million in profits. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,986-1,993

18. Obamacare $500,000 Annual Executive Compensation Limit for Health Insurance Executives (Tax hike of $0.6 bil/takes effect Jan 2013). Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,995-2,000

19. Obamacare Employer Reporting of Insurance on W-2 ($min/takes effect Jan. 2012): Preamble to taxing health benefits on individual tax returns. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,957

20. Obamacare “Black liquor” tax hike (Tax hike of $23.6 billion/took effect immediately). This is a tax increase on a type of bio-fuel. Bill: Reconciliation Act; Page: 105

21. Obamacare Codification of the “economic substance doctrine” (Tax hike of $4.5 billion/took effect immediately). This provision allows the IRS to disallow completely-legal tax deductions and other legal tax-minimizing plans just because the IRS deems that the action lacks “substance” and is merely intended to reduce taxes owed. Bill: Reconciliation Act; Page: 108-113--points excerpted John Kartch and Ryan Ellis

There's no small wonder Justice John Roberts dubbed this monstrosity a tax! Or as I refer to it Obamatax!

The above taxes will be passed on to the middle class as higher medical cost. Moreover, a two-year-old payroll tax break is scheduled to lapse at the end of this year. That would increase Social Security taxes on everyone by 2 percentage points on wage income below $113,700. (The Middle Class)

So restating, the Fiscal Cliff (FC) is the scenario president Obama has set up by first allowing tax cuts starting in 2001 to expire. In addition to cuts expiring tax laws are set to change at midnight on December 31, 2012, which are the end of last year’s temporary payroll tax cuts (resulting in a 2% tax increase for workers). The FC is the end of certain tax breaks for businesses, shifts in the alternative minimum tax that would take a larger bite and the beginning of taxes related to President Obama’s health care law. At the same time, the spending cuts agreed upon as part of the debt ceiling deal of 2011 will begin to go into effect. According to Barron's, over 1,000 government programs - including the defense budget and Medicare are in line for "deep, automatic cuts."

This all coming from a man who said September 2008, “I can make a firm pledge under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.”

That pledge, a lie. A lie on parallel with the Benghazi lies told by the Soetoro administration. The only difference is no one's died. Yet!

In the Orwellian world of Democrats higher taxes is merely more “revenue.” However, contrary to what the president and his surrogates are saying everyone who has a job and everyone who spends money will be paying more taxes not just the Rich. Taxes will be increasing on everyone no matter what a person’s tax rate is and no matter their income level again not just the so-called Rich.

Therefore when a Democrat or Republican says that more revenue is needed, what they are really says is let the American people eat tax increases to pay for the historic and extravagant spending of the Soetoro administration! Maria Antoinette would be so proud of her current Democrat American acolytes.

Indeed let them eat tax increases!

The Orwellian Sen. Harry Reid

“If we can come up with something like we did when they created this other furor by refusing to increase the debt when we had the ability to come in here and have a couple of votes to determine whether we were going to increase it. I mean if that’s what they want to do again I’ll be happy to seriously take a look at that and report to the White house and my caucus but until then I object.” —Sen. Harry Reid

There is nothing better than a good soft shoe. A little sand spread on stage then the performer rhythmically glides and shuffles his or her feet in syncopated and non-syncopated movements of sound.

And then there is Senate Leader Democrat Harry Reid. You won’t find a better political Orwellian soft shoe than Sen. Reid.

What Sen. Reid spreads around isn’t sand nevertheless the way he uses newspeak the Orwellian concept of attempting to influence thought by influencing the expressiveness of the English language is simply Blackwhite.

Blackwhite is defined as follows:

...this word has two mutually contradictory meanings. Applied to an opponent, it means the habit of impudently claiming that black is white, in contradiction of the plain facts. Applied to a Party member, it means a loyal willingness to say that black is white when Party discipline demands this. But it means also the ability to believe that black is white, and more, to know that black is white, and to forget that one has ever believed the contrary. This demands a continuous alteration of the past, made possible by the system of thought which really embraces all the rest, and which is known in Newspeak as doublethink.—George Orwell, 1984 (see 2:53min video)

Notice how Sen. Reid vilifies Republicans with Reid “soft shoe” Blackwhite Owellianism.

First Sen. Reid falsely claims that Gov. Romney is still lurking in the background. The truth is Gov. Romney has nothing to do with the Fiscal Cliff negotiations. He then states that Republicans can’t decide who is leading them Senator McConnell or Congressman Boehner pointing to the obvious disunity in GOP leadership.

Sen. Reid pronounced that Americans blame George Bush for the debt crisis we now face even after 4 years of Soetoro historic record spending

Reid intimates that Republicans are solely responsible for the fiscal crisis

Anticipating another dismal jobs report Sen. Reid deflects by saying the new jobs report is reflective of a little problem caused not by four years of a Democrat presidency and it’s policies he suggests that hurricane Sandy allowed only the creation of a meager 100,000 new jobs. Which brings the total job creation of the Obama administration overall to 4 million. Realizing that this is a laughable number Reid adds, job creation under Obama doesn’t make up for jobs lost during the Bush years but Democrats are making progress.

Reid then attacks what he terms top down economy during Bush years. He believes through the reelection of Obama Americans rejected that economy. He further believes the Bush economy is the reason Americans rejected Gov. Romney

Even so, Reid says that he would be happy to look at the same top down economic ideas that the Republicans are still attempting to present in the present Fiscal Cliffs debates.

Then Sen. Reid goes totally negative he says, “If we can come up with something like we did when they created this other furor by refusing to increase the debt when we had the ability to come in here and have a couple of votes to determine whether we were going to increase it. I mean if that’s what they want to do again I’ll be happy to seriously take a look at that and report to the White house and my caucus but until then I object.”

Sen. Reid has just given the Republicans the old soft shoe of Blackwhite. Orwellian newspeak that is meant to demonize Republicans by making statements that are in complete contradiction of the facts.

President Bush did not cause the present debt crisis 4 years of Democrat policies under Democrat president Barry Hussein Soetoro caused this present fiscal crisis.

Republicans aren’t solely responsible for the fiscal crisis Democrats share equal if not more fault.

Job loss wasn’t a result of Bush policies Job loss is the result of Business and Government collusion for the benefit of American born international corporations and their attempt to increase profits and reduce overhead.

President Obama is equally at fault for this.

Sen. Reid’s criticism of a Bush so-called top down economy must be taken for what it is worth given that the Senate, which Sen. Reid is the leader has not presented a budget for the last four years. This is irresponsible and reckless. In addition, this disqualifies Reid from criticizing anyone on fiscal matters.

While I am not suggesting that Conservatives resort to the Orwellian tactics of the Democrats I am showing this methodology as a way of explaining what Democrats are doing to manipulate the American people. I do this in hopes that Republicans study these tactics and create viable counters to this very effect propaganda device.

Nancy Pelosi is Now the Orwellian Speaker of the House

Fundamentally Changing America through language and revisionist history is the root of Orwellian ideology and Soetoro and Pelosi are quintessential newspeak propagandists.

John Boehner is toast. I don’t know if he knows it but Nancy Pelosi has already assumed the role of Speaker of the House.

In Ms. Pelosi’s recent press conference on middle income tax cuts, she unveils just what to expect in the Fiscal Cliff battle. If Boehner continues on his same course, he doesn’t stand a chance.

In a masterful strategic move, Progressives have broken the battle into pieces. Ms. Pelosi is tasked with confusing the issue with talks of helping the middle class via tax cuts. To citizens that voted as if their “lady parts depended upon it” or to the typical Obama phone voter they will only hear “middle income tax cuts” and that Republicans are holding those tax cuts hostage to tax cuts for the rich.

This is a deviously brilliant political meme to introduce into the fiscal cliff battle. What it does is cast Republicans once again as the political villains who only look out for the rich. All the while, the rest of the country will go over the fiscal cliff burdened down by higher taxes. Of course, Democrats are pretending to protect the middle class from such tax increases.

The truth is President Barry Hussein Soetoro extended the so-called Bush tax cuts twice his first term and he did it purely for political advantage. Now that he doesn’t have to worry about reelection he can do what he always wanted to do, let the so-called Bush tax cuts expire. If you remember, President Bush cut taxes for all Americans. President Soetoro plans to increase taxes on everyone however first he must seem like he is actually cutting taxes on the middle class this is where Ms. Pelosi comes in.

She is creating the illusion that the President is cutting taxes for the middle class, while he will be only raising taxes on evil rich Americans. Citizens in the president's opinion who do not pay their fair share. That’s the meme.

However, in reality Democrat legislation such as Obamacare, State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), college student financial aid, terrorism risk insurance, and farm subsidies are going to raise taxes on everyone not just the rich. These increases will be huge.

What Democrats are hoping is that they can keep “Lady part” and “Obama phone” voters distracted with talk of cutting taxes for the middle class, as Pelosi is doing, while Democrats raise the aforementioned taxes on everyone while everyone is completely unaware. It is a classic case of political slight-of-hand. Our attention is on the tax cut hand while the tax increase hand gives the middle class the shaft.

By the way, the Obamacare, SCHIP, college student financial aid, terrorism risk insurance and farm subsidies taxes are all in place and scheduled to quietly begin after the president’s inauguration. Therefore, if Republican cave in to Democrats demands and raise taxes on the rich Democrats will be able to appear that they cut taxes for the middle class and raised taxes on the rich when in fact taxes will be increase on everyone only the so-called rich will take a double hit. (source)

This is diabolical political deception at it’s lowest because this farce is meant to keep the president’s low political I.Q. supporters ignorant that taxes are being increase on them as well as the rich.

Why is it that Republicans don't know how to manipulate language and policy like this? Republicans have not held a press conference during or after the election as Democrats have done to explain why Democrats are scumbags as Democrats do to them as Pelosi is doing to them. (see 1:38min video)

As you know as we have been saying as the president has said he has his pen in hand. He is ready to sign a middle income tax cut. Last July that legislation passed the United States Senate. A similar, an exact same bill was introduced in the House at that time and since then we have been asking Republican leadership to bring the middle income tax cut to the floor.

The clock is ticking the year is ending it’s really important that tax legislation for it to happen now. We are calling upon the Republican leadership in the House to bring this legislation to the floor next week. We believe that not doing that would be holding middle income tax cuts hostage to tax cuts for the rich. Tax cuts for the rich, which do not create jobs just increase the deficit keeping mountains of debt onto future generations.

And so to that end we are, we will be intro…if if the bill if there is no announcement of scheduling the middle income tax cut which by the way has tremendous support in the Republican caucus I think we would get a hundred percent vote on it if it came to the floor. If it is not scheduled then on Tuesday we will be introducing a discharge petition which you know if we could get two hundred and eighteen signature would being the bill automatically to the floor. That would mean that we need some Republicans who support middle income tax cuts to sign on with us. --Nancy Pelosi, Orwellian Speaker of the House

What Republicans must do is respond to Ms. Pelosi in like kind. They must break down this challenge and these false allegations and answer point by point where Pelosi is wrong and deceiving and state their position in language that positions them on the right side of the fiscal cliff vis-à-vis middle income tax cut argument.

Fundamentally Changing America through language and revisionist history is the root of Orwellian ideology to which Soetoro and Pelosi are quintessential newspeak propagandists. Republicans would do well to learn what is being done to them if they ever care to win a major election again. Until they do, Nancy Pelosi is defacto Speaker of the House.

Moreover, remember Hillary is an Alinskite also and she is quite able to create worlds from deception and lies remember her claims that her airplane came "under sniper fire" during a 1996 Bonsia trip.