The U.S. is Doomed

California will form the nucleus of what he calls "The Californian Republic," and will be part of China or under Chinese influence.

Texas will be the heart of "The Texas Republic," a cluster of states that will go to Mexico or fall under Mexican influence. Washington, D.C., and New York will be part of an "Atlantic America" that may join the European Union.

Canada will grab a group of Northern states Prof. Panarin calls "The Central North American Republic." Hawaii, he suggests, will be a protectorate of Japan or China, and Alaska will be subsumed into Russia.-- ANDREW OSBORN, WSJ

The U.S. is doomed so says Russian Prof. Igor Panarin, 50 years old, a former KGB analyst, he is dean of the Russian Foreign Ministry's academy for future diplomats. (see story)

Prof. Panarin has been predicting the demise of the United States for a decade he wasn’t taken serious at first but now more than just he can see the handwriting on the wall.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that by outsourcing middleclass jobs for over 10 years and in-sourcing Illegal Alien workers, U.S. corporations have destroyed the economic ecosystem of America, it is akin to breaking the food chain in the ecosystem and the higher animal life forms begin to be affected because the food that animals down the food chain is missing, starving the mid chain Animals because the food that they depend upon was taken out of the system. This is what Corporations have done to the entire economic system in America.

Though Corporations’ original goal was more profit by cheaper labor their insatiable appetite for Global economic greed has in fact caused the economic crisis that we face today. Corporations are at fault for everything that is wrong with America today!

Prof. Panarin has long predicted that that an economic and moral collapse will trigger a civil war and the eventual breakup of the U.S. The same argument that Osama bin Laden argued in 1998 when he declared Jihad against America for its moral depravity.

Bin Laden’s argument was that a long protracted war would bring America down to its knees and because of America’s degeneracy Americans would not have the moral turpitude to fight and win against religious zealots who are morally pure.

Well, we are in the midst of our long protracted war and because of it America has chosen a president who may be constitutionally illegitimate whether the Supreme Court says so or not.

And because there is this question of legitimacy regarding Barack Obama the American system has thus far shown that it is incapable of protecting or defending its very own constitution. That I would say is showing a weakened state in American affairs.

In addition Americans have elected a Democrat majority Congress. All three governmental branches are now under Democrat control meaning this is the scenario that bin Laden had in mind in 1998 with Bill Clinton as president. Bin Laden was counting on the fecklessness of Democrats when he declared jihad in 1998 and now all the conditions that bin Laden needed for victory are finally in place in 2009.

There are many enemies that are counting on the demise of America and Prof. Panarin calculates, in brief, that mass immigration, economic decline, and moral degradation will trigger a civil war next fall and the collapse of the dollar. Around the end of June 2010, or early July, he says, the U.S. will break into six pieces -- with Alaska reverting to Russian control.

Wait a minute isn’t 2010 the calendar year the Mayan calendar ends, therefore the end of the world? (see story)

Well like most things experts can’t agree whether it’s 2010, 2012 or 2039, but one thing I think we can all agree January 20, 2009 will be the end of America as we have known it.

And I don’t say so, the man that you’ve just elected as President did! And I think for once Russia, al Qaeda and America is in agreement on something.

This is the end of the world as you know it! (see story)

HAVE A HAPPY NEW ERA

Real Change equals Senate minus Harry Reid

Reid in forefront, Pelosi Clyburn and Dodd

Sen. Reid, perhaps the most-vulnerable Democrat who will face re-election in a midterm race-- T.W. FARNAM, TWSJ

He is the face of what is wrong with American politics. Senate Majority leader Harry Reid is the bi-partisan rancor that has been plaguing Washington politics for well over twelve years. (see story)

The only thing is, most of us will not be able to vote him out of office only Nevadans will have that special privilege.

Harry Reid pronounced that the Iraq war was lost when it wasn’t, Harry Reid who openly undermined this country while we were at war.

Harry Reid is to America what Doctor Smith was to Will Robinson and the crew of Lost in Space. “Danger America, Danger America!

Sen. Reid, however, faces a potentially tough fight. A recent Research 2000 poll of likely voters put his approval rating at 38% and his disapproval rating at 54%, a possible reflection of voters' displeasure with gridlock and partisanship in Washington.-- T.W. FARNAM, TWSJ

Sen. Reid is worried that the people of America will actually want change and put an end to the bi-partisanship that has been the hallmark of Harry Reid politics.

Yet he is preparing to fight to keep his seat of power and will not be so easily removed.

Well here it is America you said that you wanted change, you said that you don’t like the bi-partisan gridlock, the do nothing Congress, if you where serious about any of it you will encourage Nevadans to vote out one of the chief architects of Senate ineptitude, dissention and bi-partisan gridlock. He is the scourge of our troops and a nemesis to America, Sen. Harry Reid most be voted out of Congress!

For a better America, vote anybody but Reid!

This is the Dawning of the Era of Obama

Palestinians carry a wounded man after Israeli air force attacked Gaza City December 27, 2008.

You were warned. You didn’t listen and now the Palestinians have promised to unleash hell on earth and believe me there will be blood. There will be war and blood! If you don’t know this is just one of the tests for your President-elect Barack Hussein Obama.

Can you blame this on President Bush in any way? Oh I know that you wish you could and you might try but as Vice President-elect Joseph Biden warned this crisis is singularly Obama’s (see video)



Since December 19th 2008 Hamas has officially declared an end to the cease fire between Israel and Palestinians in the Gaza strip however they have been firing missiles into Israel for months. (see story) and (here)

Palestinian group Hamas has declared that the six-month ceasefire between Israel and the Gaza Strip is over.

The ceasefire officially ended at daybreak in Gaza on Friday and came after armed Palestinian groups admitted that they had been using the truce to train and better arm themselves.--Al Jazeera.com

Israel and Palestinian militant groups reached an Egyptian-mediated cease-fire in June after months of indirect negotiations. The deal halted a deadly cycle of Palestinian rocket attacks and Israeli reprisals. This is the ceasefire which Hamas violated by showering Israel with missiles

For two months now Hamas Palestinians have been raining hundreds of missiles on Israel attempting to kill Jews indiscriminately and in response Israel retaliated by firing back 30 targeted missiles aimed at missile sites and supply tunnels. As you know terrorist purposely position their missile launch sites in the middle of civilian populated areas for the purpose of protecting their launch sites with potential civilian blood if enemies choose to retaliate. Try as you may you can not blame Israel for this violence this is terrorist initiated violence. (see video)



If there were a U.S. administration that was perceived as squarely supportive of Israel it is highly unlikely that terrorist would be attacking Israel now but because President-elect Obama has attempted to have it both ways Hamas is pressing Obama and a Democrat controlled Congress to see if Democrats will be as feckless with their support of Israel as they’ve been for 6 years of the Iraq war.

Now that terrorist have the leadership that they want in America you can bet as Vice President-elect Joe Biden has warned Barack Obama will be tested.

Hamas repeated rocket and mortar attacks against Israel are just one of the first of such tests!

Obama is investigator, judge and jury; Finds Himself Not Guilty

Obama and Blagojevich

What did you expect? Can anyone else see the absolute absurdity in this? Like President-elect Barack Obama’s own investigation would find that he was involved in a Quid Pro Quo deal involving his ex-Senate seat, Gov. Rod Blagojevich and close associate and ally Valerie Jarrett. (see story)

No, no, no this is a man who successfully ignored a Federal Lawsuit asking him to produce a valid Birth Certificate. When the time to respond to a lawsuit filed by attorney Philip Berg expired, under Federal Court Rules, they (Sen. Obama, the DNC and Obama’s attorneys) all admitted, according to law, that he was not a citizen of The United States of America and is deemed to have committed fraud. (see story)

In other words this is a man who knows how to manipulate the laws of the United States of America, the media (releasing findings of his own investigation in the Blagojevich investigation) and the American people.

And speaking of birth certificates wouldn’t it be better for President-elect Obama to put his crack Blagojevich team on the job of locating the vault copy of his full original birth certificate rather than waste our time with a redundant investigation that the U.S. Attorney is officially handling.

If Obama chooses to enter office under the cloud of illegitimacy, that will taint the image of America throughout the world, it will taint the image of the first Black president, it will taint the whole Democrat Party and it will taint the DNC.

As a matter of fact the whole American election process and the Supreme Court are all at jeopardy because at this point they all know that Obama has admitted legally that he is not a natural born citizen and is in violation of the constitution and if they all knowingly go along with this fraud the whole American system is admitting that it is as corrupted as Obama.

But to the contrary, PE Obama has released his own version of what happened in the Gov. Blagojevich scandal, an on going criminal investigation, it is an accounting which totally absolves himself, his confidante, Valerie Jarrett and his transition team of any wrong doing whatsoever instead of speaking directly to the constitutional critical question of whether he is even qualified to be president under article II of the U.S. constitution.

So according to PE Obama’s investigation U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald’s investigation is a big waste of time so the question is why did Patrick Fitzgerald arrest Gov. Blagojevich in the first place? And why is he taking up President-elects Obama valuable time with this non-issue? Is it because he’s Black?

The President-elect must be allowed to get back to his Hawaii vacation and his preparations to take over power when he is officially President of the United States of America whether or not he is legitimate or illegitimate.

It is obvious that Fitzgerald, having nothing else to do is attempting to make the first Black President look bad with these scurrilous allegations.

Fitzgerald should be arrest and sent to Gutonimo prison for immediate questioning and torture. Well at the very least he should be fired along with the other 93 U.S. Attorneys when PE Obama is President.

Merry Ploymas and a Happy New Era

Merry Ploymas and a Happy New Era

Our New Messiah?

Whatever we once were, we are no longer a Christian nation – at least, not just. We are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, and a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers.—Senator Barack Obama, June 28, 2006

On this Christmas day the man who Americans vote president believes that America is no longer a Christian nation. Therefore I say that there are two things that President-elect Barack Obama knows absolutely nothing about they are American ideology and the Christian religion. (see video)



First Obama calls America a modern pluralistic society. He no doubt is attempting to speak to the many languages, cultures and religious beliefs that presently reside in America. But this is nothing new or modern, America from its inception accounted for different cultures and faiths.

For example the first Jewish synagogue opened in Newport, Rhode Island in 1790. (It was called the Touro Synagogue. President George Washington sent this letter, dated August 17, 1790 upon its opening:

“May the children of the stock of Abraham who dwell in the land continue to merit and enjoy the goodwill of the other inhabitants. While everyone shall sit safely under his own vine and fig-tree and there shall be none to make him afraid.” (source)

In another example, campaigning for religious freedom in Virginia in the 1700’s, Thomas Jefferson demanded recognition of the religious rights of the "Mahamdan," (Muslim) the Jew and the "pagan." So contrary to Sen. Obama’s assertion America has long been a Christian nation that has always been open and tolerant of other beliefs, faiths and traditions. (source)

However what the Founding Fathers did not envision was a multicultural, polytheistic society as Sen. Obama is mistakenly advocating for. No the Founders knew that if America was going to survive it would have to be one nation made up of many people, faiths and beliefs.

"E PLURIBUS UNUM" ("OF MANY, ONE")

"E Pluribus Unum" was suggested by the committee Congress appointed on July 4, 1776. E Pluribus Unum describes an action: Many uniting into one. An accurate translation of the motto is "Out of many, one"

The American idea symbolizes the uniting of differences into one American reality much as a marriage combines two life experiences into one. Simply stated we need one American tradition that everyone who considers themselves American will identify, if this country is to continue to survive.

Sadly Obama’s vision is a throw back to the multicultural, polytheistic balkanization that has been shown to be a dismal failure throughout the world and is the primary reason that so many people around the world flee the chaos of their countries and come to America.

Obama is simply wrong to suggest the end of what has fundamentally made America what it is and he is wrong to equate parity to any other beliefs. And although other faiths reside here, in this country, they did not share in the formation of the ideas that make this country what it is. A simple look at the countries from which these other faiths come is enough to cancel out any false parity to Christianity in America.

WHO’S CHRISTIANITY

Furthermore, Sen. Obama showed his ignorance of the Christian faith when he cited Levitical law and law from the book of Deuteronomy as if those laws were somehow applicable to Christianity. Any neophyte Christian would know that they are not!

Yet, this is the man that America has voted to be the 44th President of the United States of America. A man who apparently doesn’t understand the concept of “E Pluribus Unum”, a man who doesn’t understand the uniquely singular relationship that only Christianity has with America and a man who has no understand of what indeed Christianity is itself!

Because of Barack Obama’s profound ignorance of these things we can expect profound and fundamental change to the pillars of our society Americans, pillars that up until now have made America uniquely different and great among the nations of the world.

As we ready ourselves to enter into a new era under an Obama administration we must prepare for damage to the social fabric of our society in proportions that we’ve never seen before. Hoping that I am not overstating my angst, this may very well be the last Merry Christmas I can wish you because of the change which Barack Obama will implement. So in anticipation of the multicultural polytheistic new world order of the Obama administration I wish you all this day…

A MERRY POLYMAS AND A HAPPY NEW ERA!

Pope Benedict’s Go Green Sexuality

Pope Benedict XVI

The Catholic Church teaches that while homosexuality is not sinful, homosexual acts are. It opposes gay marriage and, in October, a leading Vatican official called homosexuality "a deviation, an irregularity, a wound."

Go green sexuality is sex as it was designed and intended to be and in the new green world Pope Benedict is calling for the ecology of man. The spiritual ecology that is! In a recent statement the Pontiff said that saving humanity from homosexual or transsexual behavior was just as important as saving the rainforest from destruction. (see story)

The Pope also said that, the tropical forests do deserve our protection. But man, as a creature, does not deserve any less.

In a very timely comment on the state of homosexual leaders’ organized attempts to promote legalized homosexuality worldwide Pope Benedict XVI has come out for heterosexuality.

The pope said humanity needs to "listen to the language of creation" to understand the intended roles of man and woman. He compared behavior beyond traditional heterosexual relations as "a destruction of God's work."

And though in a normal world you would think the Pope wouldn’t have to, he also defended the Church's right to "speak of human nature as man and woman, and ask that this order of creation be respected."

However Congressman Barney Frank the first openly homosexual U.S. House Representative is still fuming that President-elect Barack Obama has extended an invitation to Pastor Rick Warren of the Saddleback Church in California to do the invocation at Obama’s inauguration. (see story)

Frank refusing to change from the hatful and divisive bi partisan politics of the left is accusing President-elect Obama of overreaching in his apparent attempt to bring the country together. According to Frank, “… he (Obama) overestimates his ability to get people to put aside fundamental differences."

Rep. Frank feels that since Pastor Warren promotes biblical ideas regarding sexuality that to have Warren in such an auspicious setting would send a message to the country that Frank doesn’t agree with.

Like the Pope Pastor Warren teaches that homosexual acts are biblically sinful and only heterosexual relationships are God ordained.

This teaching does not sit well with homosexuals like Frank who are attempt to change this society through the courts by bringing legal actions that define homosexuality as a legal right.

If the entire scope of the homosexual agenda is realized the Pope and Pastor Warren alike would be prevented from speaking inside their own churches affirming the teachings of the bible with regards to homosexuality.

Such biblical teachings would be governed by so called hate speech legislation that homosexual advocates are attempting to legalize throughout the United States and the world.

So there is no wonder why Rep. Barney Frank is against Pastor Warren speaking outside of his congregation and on such a prominent occasion as the Obama inauguration.

If homosexuals like Frank have their way no Christian would be apart of the Obama inauguration nor would they be apart of the change that they have envisioned for America.

Frank’s view of America is a carbon coal and fossil fuel like view of sexuality whereas the Pope is espousing a new clean green renewable sexuality which is meant to keep America and the world safe, healthy and protected from the scourge of AIDS and other life threatening man-made diseases. Diseases made by man’s unwillingness to admit that sexuality and sensuality have a purpose much higher than just recreational functioning.

In order to have a sustainable humanity the Pope is calling for go green sexuality for the 21st century.

Barney Frank should listen and heed the Pope’s call and stop with the bi-partisan bitterness and wrangling that have typified the last eight years of Democrat politics.

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

America’s Princess Carol

U.S. Political Royalty Caroline Kennedy

"I don't know what Caroline Kennedy's qualifications are. Except that she has name recognition, but so does J-Lo." — Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-N.Y.

The form of government secured by the Declaration of Independence, the American Revolution, and the Constitution is unique in history and reflects the strongly held beliefs of the American Revolutionaries.

At the close of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia on September 18, 1787, a Mrs. Powel anxiously awaited the results, and as Benjamin Franklin emerged from the long task now finished, asked him directly: "Well Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?" "A republic if you can keep it" responded Franklin .—Congressman Ron Paul


Charles Krauthammer’s “Caroline Kennedy's Senate quest: entitlement is the problem” spells out what I consider to be one of the current major problems with American Politics and is what the Obama Blagojevich scandal is so symptomatic of. (see story)

The Blagojevich scandal is laden with political favoritism and nepotism, as everyone now knows president-elect Obama wanted his long time friend and confidante Valerie Jarrett appointed to Sen. Clinton’s senate seat but what you probably don’t know is the reason why Gov. Blagojevich is not yet impeached by the state senate of Illinois for attempting to sell in a Quid pro quo deal Senator Clinton’s senate seat.

It is now believed that House Speaker Michael Madigan of the state senate of Illinois is holding off of impeaching Blagojevich even though he has the votes to impeach, because of his hope that the Governor will name his daughter attorney General of Illinois Lisa Madigan to Hillary Clinton’s senate seat. (see story)

Nepotism, bloodlines and entitlement, The Roosevelts, Kennedys, The Bushes, are not exactly what the founders had in mind at the formation of our Democratic Constitutional Republic, bloodlines or monarchies were and are the antithesis to the American idea.

Yet due to what appears to be the dumbing down of the American electorate and its representatives, it seems that Americans and their Representatives are perfectly fine with the idea of losing the Republic for the simple-minded convenience of name recognition, political fame and dynasty.

How else would one explain the mentioning of American political Royalty, Princess Caroline Kennedy’s name with that of Sen. Hillary Clinton’s New York Senate seat which will become vacant due to Sen. Clinton’s appointment to the Obama Cabinet as Secretary of State?

Are there really no better qualified and meritorious considerations than Caroline Kennedy? Answer yes there are but that is not what is at issue here, what is at issue is the superficial and iconic thinking that would even raise the possibility of Caroline Kennedy filling Hillary Clinton’s Senate seat.

But despite Mr Obama's victory, America's most prominent political families remain remarkably resilient, partly because of the president-elect's own fondness for the star power of the Kennedys and – since he won the Democratic primary – the Clintons.-- Toby Harnden (see story)

We are now officially a star struck paparazzi driven culture that elects its governing officials like all U.S. High Schools elect their Prom King and Queen, is he or she popular, photogenic and are we able to turn our current desired choice into a tee shirt imaged cause célèbre?

I can see Caroline Kennedy’s face now, silhouetted upon a nice form fitting hot pink tee supported by the slogan, “It’s Her Turn now, why because she’s a Kennedy!”

And we will all alternate it within our wardrobes with our hip Obama ’08 and Che Guevara silhouetted image tees.


If not the scenario mentioned above then political office is handed down to the politician’s progeny like dad’s old worn jacket when a few pounds prevent him from wearing it.

And finally if no politically popular icon, if no political progeny, then friends and acquaintances will do, but if your name is Kennedy we bow and curtsy as you ascend your rightful place of power Your Highness.

Yes indeed, a Republic if you can keep it. Prospects are looking more like we are losing what Benjamin Franklin and the Founders intended. We are posed to fundamentally change the Constitution by disregarding the parts that we do not like as we return to the reign of monarchy.

Today we call these moves to tyranny by a 21st century term CHANGE!

Schwarzenegger Next?

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger

If the Electoral College appoints [Barack Obama] as President of The United States of America on December 15, 2008 and Congress ratifies that choice, and it is later proven that he is not a US citizen, then not one single word he utters will be valid as representing this country. –Mark S. McGrew, Pravda

Arnold Schwarzenegger wants to be President of the United States of America we’ve known it for years and who can deny him? The Federal courts, the U.S. Supreme Court, the Electoral College, the Senate? Fact is there is no controlling legal authority that could stop Arnold if he would just go for it!

The only thing that could stop someone like Arnold would be his own personal code of ethics but providing that he didn’t have any then even he an Austrian born naturalized U.S. citizen could just disregard the constitution and became President. (see story)

Talk of amending the Constitution was a hot topic in California and Washington during Schwarzenegger's first couple of years in office--Michael Rothfeld

Isn’t it a coincidence that an associate lawyer in a Chicago-based firm whose partner served on a finance committee for then Sen. Barack Obama has advocated for the elimination of the U.S. Constitution's requirement that a president is be a "natural-born" citizen, calling the requirement "stupid" and asserting it discriminates, is outdated and undemocratic.

The paper was written in 2006 by Sarah Herlihy, just two years after Obama had won a landslide election in Illinois to the U.S. Senate. Herlihy is listed as an associate at the Chicago firm of Kirkland & Ellis. A partner in the same firm, Bruce I. Ettelson, cites his membership on the finance committees for both Obama and Sen. Richard Durbin on the corporate website.(see story) and (see paper)

If there is one thing that President-elect Barack Obama has proven is one shouldn’t allow a little thing like the U.S. constitution stop one from following his or her dream Arnold. Just think of all of the little foreign born boys and girls who are dreaming to one day become President of the United States of America.

According to Mark S. McGrew President elect Barack Obama has successfully ignored a Federal Lawsuit asking him to produce a valid Birth Certificate. When the time to respond to a lawsuit filed by attorney Philip Berg expired, under Federal Court Rules, they all admitted that he was not a citizen of The United States of America and deemed to have committed fraud. A normal man would have been found to have admitted he was not a US citizen but not Obama and so far the Supreme court has allowed the obliteration of the constitution. (see story)

The U.S. Supreme Court has denied 2 request by citizens of this country who were attempting to do the job that American judges and justices won’t do, that is protect and defend the U.S. constitution. The Court is scheduled for a third conference concerning PE Barack Obama’s eligibility, a conference is a meeting at which the justices discuss the merits of a case and whether to accept the case for trial. The Supreme Court is scheduled to consider the case filed by Philip Berg January 9th.

In the meantime the Electoral College met on December 15th and gave PE Obama the constitutional required electoral votes so all that is left is Congressional ratification of the Electoral College vote on January 6th 2009 and the formal inauguration on January 20th and the first other an natural born citizen will be President of the United States of America.

If Arnold really wants to be president Obama has already proved that there is nothing in America that can stop him! No Court, not the Electoral College, not the Congress and neither can the American people stop someone who willingly disregards the blind and flawed founding fathers and the outdated document that they created.

Look at whose intolerant now!

President elect Barack Obama and Pastor Rick Warren

Look homosexuals are always attempting to identify their crazy political grab for power and legitimization with Black people and the civil rights movement which was largely created by Blacks and others who risked their lives for racial equality, but where in the 60 years of Black people working for equal rights did anyone see Blacks demanding that White people just simply jump off of the planet? You didn’t.

Through it all Blacks worked with Whites, some of the same Whites that hated them, disrespected them, discriminated against them and carried on the legacy of 250 years of oppression of the Black race. Blacks didn’t demand that White vanish or be otherwise ostracized for slavery and the sequential Jim Crow discrimination that followed for at least another 150 years after slavery.

So why it is that homosexuals, who are attempting to mimic the Black experience, have it so wrong when it comes to the 97% of the population that believes normal heterosexual relations are the foundation on which humanity is built? Homosexuals can not ask 97% of the heterosexual population to go away and neither should heterosexuals feel compelled to stand aside while homosexuals attempt to reinvent definitions of civil rights, marriage and family.

Yet for whatever the reason Barack Obama has asked Rick Warren, Pastor of the Saddleback Church (which Obama and Sen. John McCain had their historical faith meeting earlier this year) to do the honors of the invocation at the Presidential inauguration January 20, 2009.

However according to Politico.com homosexuals have gone absolutely livid that such an inclusive invitation was extended to a Christian who believes the teachings of his faith regarding homosexuality. (see story)

The rapid, angry reaction from a range of gay activists comes as the gay rights movement looks for an opportunity to flex its political muscle.--BEN SMITH & NIA-MALIKA HENDERSON, Politico

After the somewhat surprising and historic support for marriage in California homosexuals are attacking anyone and everyone who dare oppose their agenda of redefining social and culture norms through Orwellian language and legal coercion.

According to the Politico homosexuals are attempting to force either Obama to change his selection from Warren or they hope Warren will be intimidated into shrieking away from the invitation. In an Orwellian speak laced letter the President of the Human Rights Campaign wrote Mr. Obama:

“Your invitation to Reverend Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at your inauguration is a genuine blow to LGBT Americans,” the president of Human Rights Campaign, Joe Solomonese, wrote Obama Wednesday. “[W]e feel a deep level of disrespect when one of architects and promoters of an anti-gay agenda is given the prominence and the pulpit of your historic nomination.”

There is so much wrong with this type of thinking and on so many levels that I will devote time in the upcoming days on how homosexuals use language to confuse their agenda with the civil rights movement and also how they intend to infuse their deviancy with language of normalcy in order to advance their cause.

Calling for the exclusion of Warren from the inauguration is what one would expect from anti-religionist bigots not a group which is suppose to be advocating for total acceptance and tolerance. To which I say: My, my look at whose intolerant now!

Maybe homosexuals don’t see Christians in this “new era that’s dawning.” Maybe just maybe only those who have been left behind will be in the homosexual vision of a new era!

We can always hope can’t we!

Scandal plagued Obama should show Birth Certificate and fire Emanuel

Rahm Emanuel (right) and Gov. Rod Blagojevich

An Emanuel source said it was "possible" that Emanuel discussed the appointment with Harris and that a specific date was mentioned. "Valerie was deciding whether she wanted to go the Senate. Others had talked to her about it. There were plenty of people who talked to her about it and thought she would be a good choice," the source said. -- NATASHA KORECKI AND FRAN SPIELMAN,ChicagoSunTimes

Apparently its one thing to stand behind a blue placard pretending that you are the Office of the President-elect while naming people to fill your future cabinet post and then it is quite another thing to send your emissaries into the sewer of Chicago politics, from whence you came, to negotiate the bequeathal of your vacated senate seat to a confidante and loyal ally.

President-elect Barack Hussein Obama has unequivocally stated that neither he nor any of his team has been involved in the Gov. Blagojevich scandal of quid pro quo politics.(see story)

“I have never spoken to the governor on this subject. I am confident that no representatives of mine would have any part of any deals related to this seat. I think the materials released by the U.S. attorney reflect that fact,” —President-elect Barack Obama

Yet sources say that Congressman Rahm Emanuel, PE Obama choice for Chief of Staff of the Obama administration, contacted Gov. Blagojevich people 21 times, recorded on court ordered wiretap probably unknown to him or Blagojevich, to ensure that PE Obama would get his personal pick of Valerie Jarrett place in the Senate spot. (see story)

According to the Noquarter blog an Obama advisor only identified as “Advisor A” on at least two occasions spoke to the Obama team about receiving something for the Senate seat. In a November 5, 2008 conversation;

• Blagojevich speaks to Advisor A
• Blagojevich mentions how Obama could remove someone from the Board of a private foundation and appoint Blagojevich
• Blagojevich voices demands for something for the seat, and he reiterates an intention to appoint himself to the seat

Then on November 7, 2008 the follow conversation ensues;

• Blagojevich speaks with Advisor A
• Blagojevich tells Advisor A he will offer the seat to Jarrett if he is appointed Secretary of Health and Human Services

If Advisor A is indeed Rahm Emanuel and if Congressman Emanuel relayed Gov. Blagojevich’s request to his boss, PE Obama then that completes the Quid pro quo circuit and contrary to Mr. Obama’s assertions his office was deeply involved in this conspiracy. (see story)

Whether or not the US attorney will go after a man that is days away from being inaugurated the 44th President of the United States of America is the question that remains to be answered.

But in all likelihood Obama will enter office with this another taint on his Presidency.

What an auspicious start for the first Black President. To enter office thought of by half of the electorate as a conman who usurped power by run for the office knowing that he is ineligible to do so because he is not a natural born citizen of the United States of America and second being involved in Chicago styled corrupt politics of Quid Pro Quo up to days of his inauguration.

So much for openness and transparency that Obama promised. If Obama wishes to be believed by anyone at all he needs to show that he is a natural born citizen before January 20, 2009 and fire Emanuel for his part in the Senate Seat for Sale scandal!

December 15, 2008

Electoral Colleges across the country voted 12/15/08

As mandated by the United States Constitution at noon December 15, 2008 state electors all across the country voted and signed their names in all 50 states and the District of Columbia making official the election results of November 4, 2008, that Barack Hussein Obama and Joseph Biden will be the 44th President and the 49th Vice President of the United States of America. Did you miss it? (see story)

One would think that the significance of this occasion would have been widely heralded but it went largely unnoticed by media and political pundits alike who seemed to be smitten with the Blagojevich corruption watch, the Iraqi farewell news conference and shoe drive held for President Bush and the finding of what could be little Caylee Anthony’s remains.

With all of that important news who would notice that Barack Obama is mere steps closer to achieving his goal of become the Nations first openly Black President, who by the way, is not at all open about his constitutional eligibility to hold the office. (No original birth certificate produced yet!)

In spite of the questions and clouds of corrupt that surround the Illinois politician regarding his Senate seat, his associations and his origin of birth, one of the last constitutional provisions which are meant to protect the American people, the Electoral College sanctioned Obama-Biden. (see story)

The process as reported by ANDY BARR of politico, Electors must cast ballots for both president and vice president and sign six “Certificates of Vote” and “Certificates of Ascertainment” that report the results to the nearest federal judge, each Secretary of State, the National Archives and Vice President Dick Cheney. On January 6, Cheney will read the results and certify the election in front of a joint session of Congress before Obama is sworn in on January 20.

Therefore the only steps remaining after the December 15th Electoral College will be the Electoral College’s results will be certified on January 6, 2009 by Vice President Dick Cheney before a join session of Congress leaving only Obama’s and Biden’s swearing in ceremony on January 20, 2009.

A historic accomplishment? I’ll say! The first non-natural U.S. born person elected President of the United States of America.

Now that’s Constitutional fundamental change! Change which indicates that the Constitution is no longer the controlling authority of this nation.

America your end is near December 15, 2008 is but one benchmark of that dreaded faithful end, January 6, 2009 is another and January 20th 2009 is another.

Finally, shoes thrown at your President who is supposed to be the most powerful man in the world is the strongest indication to date that America’s power is waning and your end America is near!

Obama’s own Investigation Clears Himself

Congressman and Presidential Chief of Staff to be Rahm Emanuel

President-elect Barack Obama said Monday a review by his own lawyer shows he had no direct contact with Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich about the appointment of a Senate replacement, and transition aides did nothing inappropriate.-- CHICAGO (AP)

Is that right Obama conducted his own investigation? You can’t make this kind of stuff up! Conducting his own investigation on himself President elect Barack Obama found that not he or any of his staff did anything wrong. Hmm, Okay!

So you there, just move along there is nothing here for you to see there was no criminal activity committed by the Obama transaction team. So move on. (see story)

However it is interesting that Chicago AP reported that Obama, fielding questions at a news conference, sidestepped when asked whether his Chief of Staff to be, Rahm Emanuel had spoken with aides to the governor about potential Senate appointees.

Then according to the Chicagotribune.com one source confirmed that communications between Emanuel and the Blagojevich administration were captured on court-approved wiretaps. The Chicagotribune reports that Obama Chief of staff Emanuel did in fact have multiple talks with Gov. Blagojevich. (see story)

Another source said that contact between the Obama camp and the governor's administration regarding the Senate seat began the Saturday before the Nov. 4 election, when Emanuel made a call to the cell phone of Harris. The conversation took place around the same time press reports surfaced about Emanuel being approached about taking the high-level White House post should Obama win. (see 1:56min video)



Emanuel delivered a list of candidates who would be "acceptable" to Obama, the source said. On the list were Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett, Illinois Veterans Affairs director Tammy Duckworth, state Comptroller Dan Hynes and U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky of Chicago, the source said. All are Democrats.

Sometime after the election, Emanuel called Harris back to add the name of Democratic Atty. Gen. Lisa Madigan to the approved list, the source said.

Among other things, a government affidavit filed with the charges claimed that Blagojevich had kicked around the idea of using his Senate selection to leverage an appointment to an ambassadorship or Cabinet post in the Obama administration.

We need to know how much of this was broached with the Obama team.

Unlike Obama Emanuel who is now working full-time on Obama's transition, has yet to resign his congressional seat. Illinois law has a different process for filling vacant House seats than Senate seats. But remember Vice President elect Joe Biden hasn’t resigned his Senate seat either only Obama has. When Emanuel resigns, a special election will be held for his replacement.

One alleged scheme outlined in the charges against Blagojevich involves the special election for Emanuel's seat when it becomes vacant. The government affidavit said Blagojevich and others were recorded talking about an unnamed "president-elect adviser" concerned about the election for Emanuel's congressional seat who might help the governor land a new job at a non-profit organization. If this is true we have the conspiracy to sell Obama's Senate seat and also a conspiracy around Emanuel's Congressional seat as well.

But just disregard anything that you might hear that might incriminate Obama, his Chief of Staff or his transaction team, Obama has done a thorough job investigation himself and his personal attorney says that neither Barack Obama nor his transaction team were involved in the play for pay scheme to sell the Senate seat that Obama resigned early to allow Gov. Blagojevich to “fill.”

Finally, in the follow video radio talk show host Michael Savage gives background on Rahm Emanuel and the corruption that has come out of Chicago and is now released into the world of American politics. (see 5:33min video)




Yeah Obama came out of the cesspool of Chicago politics but we are to believe that he is completely pristine and untouched from the corruption which is Chicago politics.

INSULT!

Shoe thrown at President Bush

"This is a gift from the Iraqis; this is the farewell kiss, you dog. This is from the widows, the orphans and those who were killed in Iraq." –Iraq shoe throwing Journalist

It was an Insult against American! The sole of the shoe is an ultimate insult in the middle eastern world. Two years ago at the toppling of Saddam Hussein’s statue one of the ways that the Iraqi people celebrated was by striking the statue with shoes as a sign of disrespect. (see 2:02min. video)



In an ironic turn of events as President Bush visits Iraq on Sunday to highlight the recently completed security agreement between the United States and Iraqi government the United States is insulted by an attack against its president. (see 2:10min.video)



After all of the efforts the United States made under the leadership of President Bush to mitigate collateral damage and after all of the efforts to be as respectful of Islam and the Iraqi people that the United States could possibly be this highly vetted Iraqi reporter is able to hurl insults at America by disrespecting our President. (see story)

Do not think for a moment that president elect Barack Obama will escape such disrespect Al Qaeda's No. 2 leader, Ayman Zawahiri has already called Obama a Malcolm X pejorative, a “House Nigger” or House Negro. (see story)

If this latest slight of president Bush is allowed because its only perceived as an isolated insular attack against Bush instead of the international act of aggression against America that it was then President elect Obama will be weakened as all Americans, even as high as the American president, are viewed as vulnerable targets throughout the world.

The Automotive Mess!!!!

Ok, we have a mess on our hands. But why do the American taxpayers have to foot the bill for yet another bailout? And one with no guarantees no less.

Pass some 15 Billion dollars of our money off to the imcompetent idiots who have been running the business, and it will only stave off total bankruptsy for maybe a few months.

Oh, and it's not just the management of the Big 3 who are at fault! Take a close look at the UAW's record of demanding more and more over the past thrity years. Remember who it was who actually sowed the seeds of today's problems, when things were still actually running pretty well.

When the robotics technology was introduced (by American developers)and presented to the Big 3, the UAW was the first to complainthat it was going to force layoffs of their workers. Never mind that the workers were employed by Ford, GM and Chrysler, the unions and often the members, feel that they work for the union.Immediately, they threatened "Strike!" if the technology was
introduced. Of course the UAW wasn't worrying about the workers,
but about the huge dues that would be lost if anyone were let go.
Unions have always worried about their "special funds" and top leaders, with the needs of the members coming second.
This is just a continuation of "business as usual"

I say, let the auto makers sink!!!......... we can't be responsible for greedy unions and poor management. They made their beds, so let them fall out of them if they want. It's time to cut the cord, and let them go. For years, they were warned to produce cars that were practical, inexpensive and safe........... those three things never came together. Not in American cars at least. Then they wonder why the Japanese have beaten their pants off. I can tell you why in a few simple words. Greed, greed, greed! Greedy union executives. Greedy business executives. The unions worried about their golden contracts, and the executives worried about their golden parachutes. It's OVER!!!!

Bankruptsy is the solution. Let them collapse, and then the courts will dictate the union contracts. Make them viable with a working company, that can produce a worthy car at a fair price. That is the only way out of this mess!

The Japanese manufacturers are producing cars, with labor costs at one third of what the American makers do. Between actual salary, contributions to pension, medical and other union-demanded benefits, the American worker is earning approximately $60 per hour. OBSCENE! How could anyone expect Ford, Chrysler or GM to produce affordable cars with expenses like that? Add to that the overpaid excecutive expenses at these plants, and there is not a doubt in my mind, that the courts could do it better!

U.N. Pushes New Warming Treaty In spite of Global Cooling

Dr. Rajendra Pachauri

“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” - Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.

Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, told The Associated Press in an interview Tuesday December 9, 2008 that there was no conclusive evidence the world is in imminent danger [due to Global warming].

"I don't think we should jump to conclusions if we get material that is based on the last one or two years," the Indian scientist said. The IPCC issues its reports every five or six years.

This statement was neatly tucked away in an article reported by Arthur Max of the Associated Press December 10, 2008 announcing that a UNIPCC panel is set to negotiate a new climate treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012. (see story)

But wait one Global warming catastrophic moment; isn’t the whole Al Gore inconvenient lie based on the scare that we and the planet are in imminent danger? And hasn’t scientific warnings of potential catastrophe been the impetus that has keep Media and the “Go Green” environmentalist at the forefront of tilting at Global warming windmills which, by the way, make them part and parcel of this Global warming fallacy. Because it is their efforts that are key to ginning up support from misinformed earth environmental do-gooders.

This is all an effort to place humanity on environmental lockdown while Internationalist control the planet with environmentally friendly draconian international edicts called Kyoto protocol or some other fascist anti CO2 international environmental treaty.

“CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another….Every scientist knows this, but it doesn’t pay to say so…Global warming, as a political vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver’s seat and developing nations walking barefoot.” - Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology Research at Chubu University in Japan.

Furthermore, this is all a United Nations plan to create a global environmental tax a new stream of global money which will give unelected U.N. representatives the resources they need to govern the world from a centralized base of power.

“The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification in the fact that it is something that generates funds.” - Award-winning Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo Tonni, of the Committee for Scientific Research in Buenos Aires and head of the Paleontology Department at the University of La Plata.

The U.N. will build an Empire on a treaty to control the emission of greenhouse gases and President Barack Obama’s people of the world will be the U.N.’s loyal chattel from which to extract fees and taxes to implement this one world rule. This will all be enacted under pseudo scientific claims that these actions are needed to save the planet.

Lawrence E. Buja, a climate change researcher for the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado claims that there now is ironclad proof of anthropogenic global warming so the way should be cleared to proceed with plans and solutions.

Is that true? Is there now irrefutable proof of anthropogenic catastrophe global warming/climate change?

Mr. Buja is referring to a IPCC study published last year of the collected the work of more than 2,000 scientists, which states that climate change is "unequivocal, is already happening, and is caused by human activity."

However the scientific evidence shows a much different outcome than the failed theory of global warming. In actuality scientific data show that the earth is cooling and that 2008 will be the coolest year this decade despite objection from biased scientists that make their livings from the pop scientist of global warming the evidence shows cooling not warming. (see story)

Also as reported by Lorne Gunter, Don Easterbrook, a geologist at Western Washington University, says, "It's practically a slam dunk that we are in for about 30 years of global cooling," as the sun enters a particularly inactive phase.

His examination of warming and cooling trends over the past four centuries shows an "almost exact correlation" between climate fluctuations and solar energy received on Earth, while showing almost "no correlation at all with CO2." (see story)

I think Comedian George Carlin says it best about anti CO2 fanatics and Environmental Global warmist (See 7:39min video)



Listening to a Comedian’s take on Global warming beats voting for a Comedian to be Senator of Minnesota any day! One you can take serious the other is a literal joke Minnesota!

Much like the joke that Al Gore and his Dr. James Hansen produced, U.N. backed preposterous theory of anthropogenic Global warming turned out to be!

Yo Ho Ho and a Tanker of Oil

Somali pirates in small boats hijacked the arms-laden Ukrainian freighter Faina

[T]he world’s legal apparatus is woefully confused as to how to respond to piracy. Are the Somali pirates ordinary criminals, or a quasi-military force?-- DOUGLAS R. BURGESS Jr., The New York Times

Blimy me buckoos where's international law when ye need it?

Piracy on the high seas me maties. Argh, and the seas are governed by international laws and absolutely no wooden leg seadog is enforcing it.



DOUGLAS R. BURGESS Jr.’s, “Piracy is Terrorism” gives us all a look at what life will be under international law and if we choose to pursue terrorist with subpoenas and arrest warrants under the Obama administration and Globalist treaties. (see story)

In clear acts of war against the civilized world, Somali pirates brazenly exploit the dovish course that the western world is on as Islamofascist terrorism escalates its assault against the western world’s economic power.

According to Burgess, the question [of whether these acts are a violation of international law or acts of war] is not insignificant. It has virtually paralyzed the navies [of countries] called to police the Gulf of Aden. The German Navy frigate Emden, on patrol this spring to intercept Qaeda vessels off the Somali coast, encountered pirate vessels attacking a Japanese tanker. But since it was allowed to intervene only if the pirates were defined as “terrorists,” the Emden had no choice but to let the pirates go.

Currently, 13 vessels are held by pirates in the Gulf of Aden, while the navies of a dozen nations circle almost helplessly.

13 vessels are held by pirates in the Gulf of Aden laden with everything from oil to military weapons and the world’s internationalist don’t know what to do?

I heard that the pirates are asking for multi-millions of dollars in ransom moneys to help fund international terrorism. Recent evidence indicates that the Somali pirates hand over a part of their millions in ransom money to Al Shabaab, the Somali rebel group that has been linked to Al Qaeda.



I say pay them! American taxpayers were just ripped off of 3 to 6 trillion dollars in the largest hijacking of a financial economy in world history a few multi-millions to get the Saudi oil back, which helps fund terrorism, is a small price to pay for a people who are going to be put on the hook for international taxes on Global warming as we are all headed for in a one world rule global economy under the control of terrorist whether they wear facial hoods and carry semi-automatic weapons or whether they hide behind laws and treaties as they exploit their booty from law abiding taxpayers.

Unlike Burgess I don’t think international law, treaties or courts are the answer to terrorism by piracy. As Burgess demonstrates by his arguments there is already hundreds of years of international law enough to deal with the Somali pirates but no one is doing anything but paying the demanded ransom. Unless international attorneys trade in their briefcases for armament or some country or countries declare war on these scoundrels hapless internationalist will continue to stand by as they always do as threats go unchallenged in the world.

Remember Darfur anyone? What has international law done about Darfur?

Obama's Chicago Three Card Monty

Gov. Rod Blagojevich and President-elect Obama

"I know he's talked to the governor," David Axelrod, 11/23/08 on Fox News

Like trying to beat a fast talking Chicago street thug in a game of Three Card Monty you can't pick the right card to win against Barack Obama.

Pick a card any card now watch Obama mix 'em. You picked birth certificate. Sorry that's not the card U.S. Supreme Court says so. Next!

You picked the card corrupted associations that's William Ayers, Tony Rezko, Saul Alinsky and Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Sorry Obama was elected in spite of his relationships with these men. Besides Obama didn't know what these men were up to! Sorry that's not the card.

You picked the card Acorn, Moveon.org, George Soros and Chicago styled corrupted politics. Sorry again total malfeasance and corrupted politics but once again you can't blame Barack Obama for the actions of others. Wrong card again.

Okay you getting wise you following the cards you think you can get it now? Its only three cards so let Obama mix 'em and now you pick okay you picked Chicago Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich a criminal complaint and arrest against him for corruption, attempting to sell Obama's Senate seat and swearing that Obama was going to have to pay him big time for the favor of putting Obama's choice and long time confidante Valerie Jarrett (who has now withdrawn her name from consideration) in the Senate seat Quid Pro Quo. (see story)



On November 23, you even got Obama adviser David Axelrod saying. "I know he's talked to the governor," Axelrod said this on Fox News Chicago in response to a question about Obama's involvement in filling his Senate seat but in classic Obama Orwellian scrubbing of the news to reinvent the truth the smoking gun video of Axelrod actually saying that Obama knew has been taken off of You Tube! (see story)

The vids been scrubbed and Axelrod another highly trained Con man is saying that he misspoke in this best Orwellian Wilson Smith impersonation.

But wait you remember former Special prosecutor PATRICK FITZGERALD? Fitzgerald is now the Illinois U.S. Attorney. He steps in and halts the investigation on Gov. Blagojevich saying that his office is making "no allegations" that President-elect Barack Obama was aware of any alleged scheming and then he promptly arrests Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich before a visible link can be established to Obama. Fitzgerald said that Gov. Blagojevich was on a crime spree and Obama didn’t know anything about it? Oh please!

This is classic Obama everyone around him is either a criminal, a radical or a malcontent and he knows or knew nothing about any of it!

Obama himself is making the round and guess what he’s saying… that’s right he knew nothing about Gov. Blagojevich, in the words of Peter the denier of Jesus, Obama never knew the man! Yeah that and a ham sandwich will make you a Muslim! (see story)

Might I remind you that after winning the General Election Obama moved his whole operation to Chicago. At first I scratched my head and thought now that's strange. But I guess Rod Blagojevich Chicago politics is what Obama knew best.

Yet once again Obama is being shielded from any appearance of guilt. Sorry this too is the wrong card if you thought that Obama was selling his Senate seat Quid pro quo. That of course is according to Patrick Fitzgerald another Chicagoan, David Axelrod who can't seem to get his story straight and the Con man der-in-Chief elect Barack Hussein Obama!

See you can't beat a playa doing his thug thizzle with the Chicago Three Card Monty! The Gov. of Illinois Rod Blagojevich may be as guilty as hell for attempting to sell the open Senate seat of Barack Obama and Blagojevich may have been waiting for some kind of Quid pro Quo from Barack Obama but fool this three card Monty is Obama's game you can’t bet a playa at his own game so Sorry suckers you lose again. You just can't pick the right card against the next Con Man der-in-chief.

Conmander-in-Chief

Pravda a Russian news paper referred to President-elect Obama as a Conman. Question, who would want his presidency tainted with the aspersion that he conned his way into the Whitehouse? Pravda reports that our enemies are already ready to discount a tainted president. (see story)

This is supposed to be an historic Presidency, upwards of 4 million people to attention the January 20th 2009 inauguration and the President-elect doesn’t care enough to quiet his distracters by producing a birth certificate and have the biggest I told you so this side of the millennium?

Here is a man who obviously cared enough about getting elected he put up a stop the smears website to answer each and every allegation against him.

Obama did not allow one John McCain charge to go unanswered on the campaign trail he hired a rapid response team to answer every assault or insult against his person or his image in a quick rapid fire 24 hour manner.

So why would Barack Hussein Obama allow the honestly asked questions about his citizenship and his constitutional eligibility go hanging about like big ugly albatrosses around his neck?

Half of the American electoral populist that’s 58.3 million people who voted against him think that there could be something wrong with the way the first Black President got elected. That is a disgrace for Black people and that is a disgrace for America.

Fortunately for Mr. Obama there is a simple fix, much simpler than fixing the distressed almost bankrupted U.S. economy. All that Obama would have to do is call a press conference and stand behind that official looking cool blue “Office of the President-elect” placard and show the American people that he didn’t actually con his way into the White house he is indeed eligible for the office that he is about to take. Look see, here my original birth certificate, he should say. What’s so hard about that?

The fact that Obama has this information all locked up takes away any argument that he has shown a valid original birth certificate. The fact that Barack Obama has as of November 27th 2008 spent over $500,000 and has dispatched an small army of attorneys to Hawaii to keep a $10 dollar Birth Certificate from being seen by the American people should give even the most ardent of blind Obama backers pause.

To date Mr. Obama as not disclosed any of the following information:

Certificate of Live Birth

Columbia College records
Columbia Thesis paper
Certification of Live Birth showing where born
Harvard College records

Illinois State Senate records
Illinois State Senate schedule
Law practice client list and billing records/summary
Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mothers
Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)
Occidental College records

Parent's Marriage Certificate
Record of baptism
Selective Service Registration
Trips schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007
Scholarly articles
Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups (source)

In spite of the above the Supreme Court Monday has turned down an emergency appeal from Leo Donofrio who says Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because he was a British subject at birth and they will not intervene in the presidential election.

Donofrio contended that Obama is not a "natural born citizen," as the president is required to be under Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution. The case, referred to the court by Justice Clarence Thomas after Justice David Souter had rejected it, argued that because Obama's father was a citizen of Kenya, at the time a British colony, the president-elect was born with dual citizenship.

This failure of the U.S. Supreme Court to enforce the Constitution represents a failure of American constitutional system at all levels. All any court along the way had to do was order Mr. Obama to show proof of eligibility, the fact that none did indicate a breech in the American system that any unscrupulous individual(s) could work for their own personal gain.

Lynn Stuter reports that the FBI has a file on Barack Obama that proves he is not an American citizen. If this is true no government agency feels the responsibility to protect the constitution. (See story)

This means that America will have its very first Conmander-in-Chief sworn in on January 20th.

An Obama Presidency a National Security Risk?

Barack Obama, Timothy Geithner and Christina Romer behind the non-existent Office of the President-elect

Barack Obama may just win his place in history as the greatest con man of all time.

A hundred million people believed him and spent 600 million dollars to get him “elected” to the highest office in America, without ever knowing if he is or is not eligible to even run as an American citizen. It is either amazing that he will pull it off or it is amazing that so many millions of people believed him.

If the Electoral College appoints him as President of The United States of America on December 15, 2008 and Congress ratifies that choice, and it is later proven that he is not a US citizen, then not one single word he utters will be valid as representing this country.

The Courts, our police, our military will have no duty to obey anything he signs. It is also possible that certain people, who were part of and promoted the con, may be charged with Treason. –Mark S. McGrew, Pravda

Like the Office of the President-elect absolutely nothing seems real about Barack Obama.

A Russia newspaper calls President-elect Barack Hussein Obama a conman. The Paper is predicting that if Obama is appointed by the Electoral College to be President of the United States on December 15, 2008 and if that appointment is ratified by Congress the world will see the President of the United States of America as illegitimate and America as an illegitimate world power.

The enemies of America will be able for the first time to say, “America you don’t honor your own constitution how dare you attempt to lead or represent yourselves as representatives of Democracy and Freedom.”

A Barack Obama presidency will signal the breakdown of the American system for the whole world to see. One man and his co-conspirators within his Political Party conned the American people and dissed the constitution. This means the world will view America as a failing hypocritical declining power that can’t enforce its own constitution; it own laws and has no business attempting to lead the world with its newly installed fraudulent government headed by a conman for President.

OBAMA ADMITTED THAT HE IS NOT A UNITED STATES CITIZEN

The Russian paper mocks the U.S. in that it reports that, Barry Sotero, AKA Barack Obama, along with the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission have successfully ignored a Federal Lawsuit asking him to produce a valid Birth Certificate. When the time to respond to that lawsuit expired, under Federal Court Rules, they all admitted that he was not a citizen of The United States of America and deemed to have committed fraud. A normal man would have been found to have admitted he was not a US citizen. (see story)

Barack Obama’s inauguration on January 20th 2009 will mark the end not the beginning of respectability for the United States of America as the world will see how the American people no longer either respect or understand their own Constitution.

The balance of power is already shifting in the world, in was reported that Russia warships are in the western hemisphere for the first time since 1944 via the Panama Canal (see story)

Federal Judge, R. Barclay Surrick dismissed the case, PHILIP J. BERG v BARACK OBAMA, THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION and DOES 1-50 INCLUSIVE, pending in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, three weeks after President-elect Obama’s non-response was proof that he is not a US citizen, thus showing to the world that the United States of America is no longer able or willing to protect its traditions, its laws or its Constitution.

In its current weaken economic and political condition brought on by the Democrat Party the very Party that the American People just elected to the Executive Branch and just reinforced in the Congress, America is well on this way to a political and economic depression that will leave it exposed to attacks from its enemies as Vice President Joe Biden as already forecasted will occur under an Obama administration.

Therefore a fraudulently placed Obama administration, itself, will pose its own daily National Security Risk!

The United States Supreme Court is currently considering whether or not they will consider just one of the many cases filed to protect the Constitution against this fraud.

However Obama’s successful eluding of any controlling legal authority thus far does not bode well for Americans who pray for the rule of law to prevail in this matter unless there is some divine intervention. (An Open Letter to Obama)

Democrats and Obama Knowingly Are Causing Constitutional Crisis for Change

Democrats for Constitutional Crisis

An associate lawyer in a Chicago-based firm whose partner served on a finance committee for then Sen. Barack Obama has advocated for the elimination of the U.S. Constitution's requirement that a president be a "natural-born" citizen, calling the requirement "stupid" and asserting it discriminates, is outdated and undemocratic.--Bob Unruh, Worldnetdaily.com

Humm… now I don’t know but isn’t there some questions whether or not President-elect Barack Hussein Obama is Constitutionally qualified to be President of the United States of America? And weren’t there numerous court filings before the election questioning that fact. And wasn’t a paper advocating for the fundamental change of the constitution to allow other than U.S. natural borns to be President of the United States written two years after Obama won his senate seat in 2004 by an Obama associate? (see paper)

Is there a connection? You bet your sweet American birth right there is!


Today the Supreme Court is reviewing petitions as to whether President-elect Barack H. Obama is constitutionally qualified to be President of the United States of America. (see story)

This issue has been going on since before the Democrat National Convention and was filed in August of 2008. Hillary Clinton supporter and attorney Philip Berg filed suit asking someone, anyone to take responsibility and protect the American people and the U.S. constitution from possible fraud. Berg’s suit named Barack Obama, Howard Dean and the entire DNC his petition asked to enjoin the Democratic National Committee from nominating Obama. The petition stated that is was feared that if Obama were nominated as the Democrat Presidential candidate his questionable citizenship would at some point cause a constitutional crisis.

Do not be fooled they all knew well before the Democrat nomination process and well before the November 4 general elections that there was a major constitutional problem with Obama running but they did nothing!

Neither the DNC nor any lower courts would ask Obama for his birth certificate committing what I consider political and legal malfeasance and negligence. So now we find ourselves with a constitutional crisis just 46 days away from inaugurating a person which he and his entire Political Party possibly knowingly campaigned and fraudulently presented himself, Barack Hussein Obama, as someone eligible to be elected president of this country.

Nevertheless, this question is larger than Barack Obama. The question is should a Political Party that knowingly committed fraud in an election be awarded victory based on that fraud? In other words if Obama is found constitutionally ineligible to be President of the United States of America the constitution allows for the Vice president-elect to be designated President in the disqualified person’s place.

However if the entire Party knew directly or indirectly that Obama was not qualified to be president and knowingly defrauded the constitution and the American people by aiding and abetting Obama in his fraudulent pursuit of the presidency it is my sense that that Party logically should not be allowed to enjoy any of the fruits of their ill-gotten gains. (see story)

Simply stated no Democrat should benefit from the fraud perpetrated on the American people by Obama and the Democrat Party. And since we are in unprecedented waters here, in that, never has a national Party attempted to knowingly fraudulently run a candidate for president it would not be out of the question to undo what the Democrats have done by holding another national election and retain the current president until the taint of fraud over the national elections which Democrats cause is corrected.

This is the constitutional crisis that the Democrats and Barack Obama have perpetrated on the American people and none of them can say that they didn’t know.

As a web blogger suggested, "So it sure looks like Obama's people have looked into the matter of 'natural born' as far back as early 2006. What is even more disturbing is that it would appear that they are following the thought of: 'If the facts do not support the theory, Destroy the facts!"

If Obama and his people knew, as it appears, that he was not eligible to be President as far back as 2006 before he announced his candidacy in 2007 then it is apparent that he being a constitutional attorney knew or thought he would be able to perpetrate this fraud on the American people and there would be no controlling legal authority to stop him. It is every American’s hope that the U.S. Supreme Court proves otherwise.

So stated this would appear to be a criminal act as well as a direct affront to our constitution one which the Democrats and Mr. Obama should have to pay an exacting toll for!

May the Supreme Court find the wherewithal to protect and defend the constitution of the United States of America in spite of the fact that Barack Obama feels that to do so is stupid, biased, outdated, undemocratic and against current trends of globalization.

God save the Republic!

This is a Load of BS!!!!

Let's bail out everyone!!!!

This has become the national joke. Now the auto makers are looking for a minimum 34 BILLION...... and we all know that is the tip of the iceberg. Hand them that money, and within 3 months they will be back looking for three times that amount.

Listening to the arguments on both sides, it comes down the the same thing. More equals more, equals more!

Let them go into Chapter 11, total reorganization under the bankruptsy laws. That way, they will be forced to regoniate union contracts, which to my way of thinking are the primary cause of the overall problem. Add to that, the stupidity and stuborness of management and you have the current problem.

After WW2, when the industry was in it's heyday, the unions took serious advantage of the industry, and made unrealistic demands for its union menbers. Some of the workers make in one week, what workers in other industries make in a month. The union's view was to make it while they could...... as evidenced by the UAW's massive stone ediface in Washington DC.

When robotics were invented in the US, it was the unions, and not management of the auto industry that squawked. Under the guise of "job loss" they prevented the industry from adopting the latest and newest technologies, and therefore laid the groundwork for today's problems.

Frustrated in the US, the developers offered the technology to Japan, ................. and the rest is history. Now, Detroit complains that Japan has taken over the auto industry. Duhhhh.............. what kind of idiots.........both in management and in the unions,............ couldn't see that coming.

Both groups deserve what they are getting today, and the taxpayers should NOT be bailing them out. The unions pushed and pushed for more and more.............now it is time for them to give some of it up. Management has to give up the lucrative bonuses and the high salaries, in order to conform to the real world.

Payback time is here!!!!1

Is Clinton Experienced enough to be Secretary of State?

PE Obama naming Sen. Clinton Secretary of State

ORWELLIAN WORLDVIEW …to hold simultaneously two opinions which canceled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy…-- George Orwell, 1984

Remember all that stuff that President-elect Obama said about his opponent Sen. Hillary Clinton during the campaign? Naw I didn’t think you did… wait a moment I think that I may be able to help. (see 0:15 video)



According to CNSnews.com, during the campaign for the Democratic nomination, Obama mocked Clinton’s primary claim that she possessed the necessary foreign policy experience to be president. (see story)

Obama questioned Sen. Clinton’s foreign policy expertise while flying from a campaign event in Texas. Obama’s statement to reporters who were obviously attempting to gin up controversy between the two of them responded to the question of Clinton’s claim to be an expert on foreign policy in this fashion, “Was she negotiating treaties? Was she handling crises? The answer is no.”

President-elect Obama also questioned Sen. Clinton’s integrity and character during the days of the campaign, “Hillary Clinton will say anything to get elected,” Obama said in a January radio ad. “Hillary Clinton. She’ll say anything and change nothing.”

Last year the Obama campaign also charged that Sen. Clinton’s ideas about foreign policy were extraordinarily similar to President Bush’s policies, “Barack Obama doesn’t need lectures in political courage from someone who followed George Bush to war in Iraq,” the campaign said in a December 2007 statement about Sen. Clinton.

Obama further maligned Clinton by indicating that she did not represent real change, “Real change isn’t voting for George Bush’s war in Iraq and then telling the American people it was actually voting for more diplomacy,” he said about Clinton in March.

Greg Craig, incoming chief counsel, said of Clinton in a March conference call: “There’s no evidence that she participated or asserted herself in any of the crises that took place during the eight years of the Clinton presidency. White House records show that she was consistently absent when critical decisions were being made and that her trips abroad were largely ceremonial.”

Susan Rice, Obama’s choice to become U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, meanwhile, said that a First Lady doesn’t deal with international issues.

“There is no crisis to be dealt with or managed when you are First Lady,” Rice said in March. “You don't get that kind of experience by being married to a commander-in-chief.”

In the most hotly debated dust-up of the primary season – over Clinton’s famous “3 a.m.” ad asking which candidate would better handle a crisis call at three in the morning -- Obama himself said Clinton had already failed the foreign policy test.

“The question is, what kind of judgment you will exercise when you pick up that phone,” Obama said. “In fact, we’ve had a red-phone moment. It was the decision to invade Iraq. Sen. Clinton gave the wrong answer.”

Despite all of the above, President-elect Barack Obama designated Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) to be his next secretary of state on Monday.

In the similiartude of the immortal words of the 1948 film The Treasure of the Sierra Madre spoken by Gold Hat played by Alfonso Bedoya, “Experience, Democrats don’t need no experience, Democrats don’t have to show you no stinking experience!” (Those sentiments apply to the Presidency as well)

Does Sen. Clinton have the experience to be Secretary of State? Well after all she did take on Bosnian sniper fire didn't she?

It is an Orwellian world after all!