The President elect and appointees Treasury Secretary-designate Timothy Geithner, Council of Economic Advisers and Chair-designate Christina Romer to his Economic Team
Question, from where did, “The Office of the President Elect derive? Seriously I’ve been combing the Constitution and I haven’t been able to find it. In addition to that no one in American history has acted as President elect Obama is. Its as if he’s already assumed power with his cool new light blue Office of the president elect placard.
That’s because there is no office of the President Elect. According to the Constitution Mr. Obama will not officially be the President Elect until the Electoral College convenes after the second Wednesday in December, December 10th, and elects him based on the results of the Nov. 4 general election as stated in the Constitution. (see story)
He [president Bush] will be the president until January 20th. However, giving--given, really, the daunting challenges that we face, it's important that President-elect Obama is prepared to really take power and begin to rule day one. –Valerie Jarrett
Obama spokes person Valerie Jarrett, co chair of the Obama transition team explains that we only have one president at a time on Meet the Press with Tom Brokaw. Ms. Jarrett also seems to think that president elect Obama will begin to “rule” on January 20, 2009. Note to Ms. Jarrett presidents govern Kings and Dictators rule! (see MTP transcript)
So what in the Hell is Barack Obama doing parading about like he has some official capacity? It is all to create an illusion of power. It seems that Mr. Obama has studied from the 48 laws of power and has enacted these laws in this campaign and is now using them in his transition. (see laws)
You are seeing before your eyes a political operation predicated on a set of Laws of Power and control that many nefarious leaders have used to form States whose functioning was a result of the ability of leaders to dupe the masses!
As Greene states, it is all about ILLUSIONS! And who is the creator of these illusions? David Axelrod, Chief Strategist of the Obama Campaign, who has followed Greene’s text to the letter.—No Quarter
President elect Obama is creating what all past dictators have created in previous fascist state rules, an air or appearance of complete control and power.
The authority that Obama is using to be able to do this is called The presidential Transition Act created in 1963 and amended in 2000. The transition act establishes formal provisions for the transition period by outlining training and other assistance that the president-elect and his team of advisers can receive as they prepare to assume office and under Section 3(a)(7)(c) it also provides that Mr. Obama can be called the president elect. (see Act)
Under this Act President elect Obama has received 12 million dollars for transitioning into the presidency and he is given the authority to set up his administration but outside of that he has no real power. He has only the illusion of power which the media is all too happy to grant him.
Yeah Ms. Jarrett maybe you are correct President elect Obama will be ready to RULE on day one!
President-elect Barack Obama, second from the right, introduces his economic team during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 24, 2008, in Chicago. From left are, Treasury Secretary-designate Timothy Geithner, Council of Economic Advisers Chair-designate Christina Romer, and National Economic Council Director-designate Lawrence Summers.
…to hold simultaneously two opinions which canceled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy…-- George Orwell, 1984
It has begun as I have predicted it would and those in the media don’t even know what has befallen them. Welcome to the Orwellian world of the left where contradiction is as natural as speaking. Oh I attempted to warn you that electing Barack Obama would be the end to meaning and language as we know it but apparently you didn’t care or you just didn’t understand.
Allow me to show you one quick instance of what we will be seeing throughout the four years of a President Obama’s administration.
A recent headline reports: Obama promotes fiscal restraint, big spending, reported by Associated Press reporter JIM KUHNHENN
In his report Kuhnhenn lays out that President-elect Barack Obama wants to project fiscal restraint even as his economic team assembles a massive recovery package that could cost several hundred billion dollars. (see story)
These are two mutually exclusive goals which contradict yet according to Kuhnhenn, “The dual images - big spender and disciplined budget watcher - were designed to give both political and economic assurances to the public, the Congress and the financial markets.”
Yes it's called doublethink! One thing for sure in the coming years we will see plenty of created dual images and hear an abundance of dual messages, all mutually exclusive and all contradictory meaning that they could not possibly be true.
Yet those of us who are Obama Proles will cast all logic to the wind and believe in the image and in the creation which is President Barack Obama and when we come to our rational minds (if we come to our rational minds) it will be to late.
We will have left America for Oceania and we all will be the Proles. (see video 10mins)
There I say it, and I understand that Liberal shills who call themselves Progressives now, are attempting to frame all conversation to make one a bigot, or a non-patriot or a naked Partisan if one makes such a declaration but in the words of a great pioneer of women’s suffrage and the one woman that was solely responsible for the 18 Million Cracks in the Glass Ceiling:
"I'm sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and disagree with this administration, somehow you're not patriotic. We need to stand up and say we're Americans, and we have the right to debate and disagree with any administration."—Sen. Hillary Clinton
Thank you Hillary I knew that you would understand why I want Barack Obama to fail, after all you and your fellow Democrats did so much to ensure that the Bush administration seems to be an failed administration at the end of eight years of the partisan warfare which you Liberals waged against a sitting President his political Party and the people of the United States.
But alas I’m not wishing Obama’s failure simply so that the Republicans can have power…no my wish is based on the opinion that everything that a Barack Obama presidency represents is wrong for America. The whole world is leaning toward conservatism while conversely American’s selection of Liberals and super Liberal Obama constitutes a step backwards from the world’s new found progress.
Yes I know, I know RINOs and Stockholm Syndrome Republicans alike are calling for Conservatives to give president elect Obama a chance hoping that he governs from the middle, they postulate that somehow maybe it won’t be so bad to lurch into Socialism and Democrat liberal Fascism. They are wrong!
Democrats including Sen. Obama have virtually broken down the American political and social system in order to achieve power. They have done this with an unflagging hardcore political partisanship that would rather see this country destroyed rather than be lead by Republicans.
This Democrat political treachery has left America exposed to an Uber-Liberal internal radical coup as well as an external threat against American sovereignty and power.
These are the changes that a Barack Obama presidency brings to America and these changes are nothing that the American people could have ever anticipated and nothing that the American people ever wanted. Yet through eight years of talking down the United States and its Government Liberals have succeeded in convinced the American people that a road to socialism is better than the democratic constitutional republic that is presently America’s government.
I want Barack Obama to fail because the policies and philosophy of the Democrat Party and Sen. Obama’s will bring great harm to our nation, here’s why:
Sen. Obama managed to get elected to the Presidency even though in 2004 he stated that he thought himself unqualified for the job.
Sen. Obama managed to get elected to the Presidency with his birth certificate, medical records, and college papers under lock and key so Americans really don’t know a lot about the man who is due to be inaugurated January 20, 2009.
Sen. Obama managed to use the internet to receive unaccountable multiple millions of dollars from sources all around the world to defeat his opponents. Obama virtually bought this election and it is my suspicion that he used foreign money to do it.
If this is true this is the first election that foreign interest over the American peoples interest played such a crucial role in electing America ’s President.
Sen. Obama managed to get elected to the Presidency using ACORN and corrupted Chicago style politics to virtually corrupt America ’s entire electoral process.
Sen. Obama, oh excuse me, that’s right he did resign his Senate seat last Sunday, President elect Obama’s life long friends, assocites, mentors, and colleagues have been Radicals, Terrorist, Communist, and Anarchists and wouldn’t you know it, these groups all want to fundamentally change America too! What a coincidence.
President elect Obama has an apparent lack of respect for the constitution, the founding fathers, and the traditions that have made this country exceptional. President elect Obama feels that the Founders and the constitution which they wrote has blind spots.
So it will be interesting to see a man who has devoted his entire adult life and political career attempting to destroy the constitution swear with his hand on a bible that he will protect and defend a document that (according to Obama) is fundamentally flawed.
Finally I want Barack Obama to fail because he and his fellow Liberal Democrats have created an Orwellian worldview by using Machavellian tactics. This is a politic that words don’t mean what one thinks they mean. Old definations are cast aside and new definations for words like marriage, freedom, and rights mean something totally different to Liberals than to some of the people who voted them into power. That is the fundamental change that we will be seeing in the next four years, a sea change of redefining America and patriotism and American life as we have known it.
Americans will sooner or later discover that not all change is good! The change that Obama promises is not good change for America that is why he must fail.
To that end I wrote An Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity, Do Unto Others as you would have them Do unto you Blessing for Barack Obama:
May Barack Obama have the same support from the American people as did President George W. Bush
May Barack Obama have the same support from Congress as did President Bush
May Barack Obama have the same success uniting the Country; politically and socially as did President Bush
May Barack Obama have the same media coverage as President Bush
May Barack Obama have the same Party loyality from the Republicans as President Bush received from the Democrats
May Barack Obama’s administration be treated the same as both of President Bush’s first term and second term administrations
May Barack Obama’s administration received the same challenges; political, natural disaters and national security threats as the Bush administration and when facing them may he receive the same unquestioning backing from Congress, the media and the America people as did President Bush
May Barack Obama receive the same respect from around the world when his administration makes tough decisions that affect world events as did President Bush
May Barack Obama share the same quiet and noble dignity when he leaves Office as President Bush who, after eight years of being attacked, derided, ridicuded and demeaned by Partisans in the Democrat Party and Partisans in the Media, received graciously Mr. Obama and his wife into the White house as an symbolic jester of nonviolent transfer of power that has made this country truly exceptional for over 200 years.
Finally after Mr. Obama four years of service to his country may he be as gracious as President Bush when Mr. Obama hands over power to the next Republican President.
You would think that the light would come on for the Government in the State of California. The people want Government out of our bedrooms. That’s what homosexuals have always claimed that they wanted and that is what millions of Californians who voted for and passed both Propositions 22 and 8 want too! No government intrusion whether courts or any other form of government because after all what two consenting adults do behind closed doors is nobody else’s business, right!
Thomas Jefferson knowing that this day was inevitable for the United States of America wrote in his Bill establishing Religious Freedom in Virginia:
[T]he opinions of men are not the object of civil government, nor under its jurisdiction; that to suffer the civil magistrate to intrude his powers into the field of opinion and to restrain the profession or propagation of principles on supposition of their ill tendency is a dangerous fallacy, which at once destroys all religious liberty, because he being of course judge of that tendency will make his opinions the rule of judgment, and approve or condemn the sentiments of others only as they shall square with or differ from his own; that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order; and finally, that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself; that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate; errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them. —Thomas Jefferson, Bill Establishing Religious Freedom in the State of Virginia, 1786
Jefferson argued that opinions, including those of religion, but nevertheless men’s opinions should not be the object of civil government.
In other words whatever your opinion is on homosexuality, it should not be made a government matter. However that is exactly what the Courts and proponents if homosexual rights and homosexual mock marriage did they used government courts to impose their opinions on the rest of society.--Alaphiah
Yet once again the California State Supreme Court has inserted itself into the constitutional quagmire of their own making by first striking down a perfectly constitutional ballot initiative, proposition 22, for politically correct reasons and then accepting three challenges to proposition 8, the constitutional amendment that defines marriage for the State of California and which is now an amendment to the state constitution. (see story)
The three cases; Strauss v. Horton (S168047); Tyler v. State of California (S168066); and City and County of San Francisco et al. v. Mark B. Horton, et al. (S168078) (see court order)attempt to invalidate the November 4, 2008 electoral process by claiming that 1. Proposition 8 is invalid because it constitutes a revision of, rather than an amendment to, the California Constitution 2. Proposition 8 violates the separation of powers doctrine under the California Constitution and the question 3) Should Proposition 8 affect homosexual mock marriages that occurred during the brief window that Courts invalidated proposition 22.
As demonstrated by the homosexual street riots and attacks on church congregations, this law suit is not about homosexual rights it is about change. Homosexuals, their allies and their advocates in government intend to change the law and thereby change the society by any means constitutionally or non-constitutionally necessary. That fact is clearly seen in Chief Justice Ronald George’s opinion written for the majority which invalidated prop 22.
When the Courts originally overturned proposition 22 the majority freely admitted that the Constitution of the State of California give them no basis in which to overrule prop 22 but the majority reasoned that because it is now time for change they, a small Oligarchy of 4 justices, invalided 4 million California votes thus their actions subsequently were the catalyst for anarchy to reign in the street of California. It was the Court’s own actions that caused this legal and social quagmire because they chose to dismiss a stay that would have prevented homosexual mock marriages until the vote of prop 8 was decided on November 4.
Marriage had always been understood to unite man and woman in the state of California according to California Chief Justice George, he said so in his judgment. In addition to that in the year 2000 the people of California did not want to leave any doubt about the clarity of that fact and passed proposition 22 by an overwhelming 62% vote on a ballot initiative, everyone clear?
Apparently not. San Francisco Gavin Newsom up and started defying the State law and began issuing illegal wedding licenses and performing illegal weddings in February 2004 as a prequel to the planned challenge of prop 22, Mayor Newsom’s open defiance of the law was so blatant that even the liberal tilted California State Supreme Court had to keep up a veneer of legality by ruling against what Mayor Newsom had done and in addition they ruled that all the illegal marriages that Newsom and the city of San Francisco preformed where invalid.
The justices ruled unanimously that Mayor Gavin Newsom overstepped his authority when he ordered the marriage licenses issued on Feb. 12 in defiance of a state law that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman.
By a 5-2 vote, the court ruled that none of the 3,955 couples who flocked to City Hall in response to Newsom's decree was ever legally married or entitled to the rights of spouses. The court said their $82 license fees should be refunded.
"A same-sex marriage performed in violation of state law is void and of no legal effect,'' said Chief Justice Ronald George, rejecting the city's plea to leave the couples' status unresolved until the court decides the validity of the marriage law in a future case. --Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer
What proposition 8 does is restore what the small and obvious biased Oligarchy on the State Supreme Court changed. It was the Court that changed the definition of marriage in its August 2008 ruling, not the people and not proposition 22 or proposition 8.
So the argument that prop 8 revises the Constitution is fundamental flawed as the Court has already stated in its decision against prop 22 that the California Constitution had always been interpreted as marriage uniting man and woman. To simply state that as an amendment to the Constitution does not change thousands of years of human history nor does it change a hundred years of California law and neither does it revise the Constitution.
Also to argue prop 8 violates separation of powers the courts would have to declare the whole ballot initiative process unconstitutional.
The idea of “direct democracy” by vote of the people is an ancient one, predating even the Greek city-states. Today’s forms of direct democracy—the ballot initiative, referendum, and recall—all provide ways to bypass the normal institutions of representative government and place legislative power directly in the hands of the voters.
The initiative process, in particular, is widely used across the United States, with about half the states providing access to it. But only in a few states is the initiative route applied as rigorously and with such sweeping results as in California.
The ballot initiative has a long and colorful history in this state. In the 1800s, only one kind of politics took place in California: corrupt politics, according to the Sacramento Bee, the leading newspaper of the time. The Southern Pacific Railroad, often called “The Octopus,” controlled almost everything in the state—the legislature, the courts, even the press.
The initiative process evolved out of an attempt to wrest control of the state’s political process away from the special interests, especially Southern Pacific. The initiative, referendum, and recall were first enacted at the local level in California when John Randolph Haynes, M.D., convinced the voters of Los Angeles in 1903 to adopt a reform package.
Statewide, the reform movement got a boost when corruption and bribery trials of several prominent labor leaders and corporate executives began in 1906.
Five years later, after many futile attempts to persuade the legislature to adopt the initiative process, direct democracy became part of a package sponsored by newly elected Governor Hiram Johnson.
In 1911, his first year in office, the legislature placed the three components of direct democracy—initiative, referendum, and recall—on the ballot. They were overwhelmingly approved by the voters.-- Robert M. Stern, President, Center for Governmental Studies (see source)
The same is true today homosexual special interest controls and has corrupted the California Governor, the State Attorney General, the State Superintendent of Education, the State legislature and the State Supreme Court as evident by the public support given to homosexuals by each of the afore named.
It is for the purpose of bypassing this very kind of corruption that the California initiative process was approved by the people in 1911.
To argue that the initiative process violates separation of powers attempts to invalidate 87 years of California legal precedence. (see video governor’s support as example)
Last, should prop 8 affect homosexual marriages that occurred during the time that an apparent compromised State Supreme Court made them legal by disregarding hundreds of years of California constitutional precedence and the people’s vote on prop 22 to uphold that precedence.
In the same spirit that San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom violated California law to which the illegal weddings that were produced by his actions were declared invalid by the California State Supreme Court the Court must be fair and find that its own actions violated the State Constitution which by the Court’s own admission had recognized marriage to join man and woman only.
Further the Court’s own negligence in dismissing a motion for stay on its own verdict in the case dismissing Prop 22 has caused the legal quagmire of illegal homosexual marriages in the state of California as well as the street riots that occurred with the passing of Prop 8.
By the Court’s own reasoning it must find itself in violation of the California constitution for invalidating the initiative process with regards to prop 22 and any and all subsequent actions that resulted from the Court’s decision is not valid meaning any marriages that violate prop 22 and/or prop 8 are not legal in the State of California. The Court must so rule.
Former News Anchor Dan Rather of the CBS News attempted to single-handedly affect the 2004 presidential elections two months before elections by reporting that six forged and falsified documents proved that President Bush’s Air National Guard service was bogus therefore making President Bush claim of military service illegitimate. Such a scandal would have thrown the 2004 election into Sen. John Kerry’s favor at least that is what Rather was hoping for.
Four of these document where presented on CBS 60 minutes as authentic however it was soon discovered that Rather and his anti-Bush assistant and associate Mary Mapes all too willingly participated in an fraudulent smear campaign initiated by Lt. Col. Bill Burkett.
Burkett claimed to have burned the originals after faxing copies to CBS. Burkett was retired as a Lieutenant Colonel from the Texas Army National Guard (see Rathergate)
Rather did not vet these documents or Burkett’s story before he broadcasted this smear to millions of viewers on his primetime Sunday night show. Up until now this was perhaps the single most blatant attempt by modern media to affect the outcome of a U.S. election.
Rathergate however was only the beginning. Former radio talk show host John Ziegler commissioned the Zogby Poll attempting to discover the media’s affect on this 2008 election. He is set to present his finding in an upcoming documentary "Media Malpractice... How Obama Got Elected". (see Zogby Poll)
What Ziegler details is a Main Stream Media pro-Obama campaign to negate the candidacy of Sen. John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin while virtually establishing themselves as a campaign arm of the Obama campaign. (How Obama got Elected)
MSM did this by selectively informing and misinforming the electorate concerning the candidates. And in President elect Obama's case the MSM completely blacked out any and all negative reporting that would have help voters make an informed vote. (see video 5:15mins)
In the most important election of our generation, it is frightening to see that millions of people went to the polls and cast ballots based on misperceptions that they received largely from the media.
When the media actively engages in politicking for one Party over the other we then no longer have the constitutional 4th estate that media was constitutionally protected to be.
What we have is Media corruption and another failed American institution. (see 9:55mins video presentation)
Finally Chris Matthews of MSNBC Hardball thinks that it is his job in the media to make Barack Obama's Presidency sucessful.
CHRIS MATTHEWS: Yeah, well, you know what? I want to do everything I can to make this thing work, this new presidency work, and I think that --
JOE SCARBOROUGH: Is that your job? You just talked about being a journalist!
MATTHEWS: Yeah, it is my job. My job is to help this country.
Matthews wasn't done with his odd new job description . . . An incredulous Scarborough kept pressing, astonished at such a complete 180 from Matthews's repeated insistence during the Bush presidency that he had to hold the government accountable.
SCARBOROUGH: Your job is the make this presidency work?
MATTHEWS: To make this work successfully. This country needs a successful presidency. NewsBusters(see 2:20min video)
I suppose this explains the tingle Matthews gets up his leg when he thinks of Obama!
It’s no secret that the moderate to liberal wing of the Republican Party staged a coup to take over the Party.
It was their idea that if Republicans were more like Democrats and Liberals and less like strict Constructionist and the Religious Right, the Party could became a big tent Party and win even in 2008.
To that end these Stockholm Syndrome Republics, hereafter SSR, put up Sen. John McCain who at the time was running a campaign going nowhere fast. SSR’s theory was that McCain would be able to pull moderates, liberals and third Party Independents into this group of, excuse the pun, Mavericks and he would be able to defeat the Democrats whether it was Sen. Hillary Clinton or Sen. Barack Obama.
Well we all know how that theory turned out.
So after such a dismal failure, one which I predicted, I stated that in a general election Liberals, Moderates and Independents were going to support a Liberal Democrat candidate over a Conservative candidate of any sorts. And I don’t mind saying that I was complete right. In fact some of the SSRs voted for Sen. Obama too. (See Dead Campaign Walking)
I only bring this up because very prominent SSRs are again attempt to influence the direction of the Republican Party. With the same “We’ve got to be more like the Democrats and work with them” mentality that lost control of both houses of Congress in 2006 and lost the Executive Office in 2008.
Here is a note to all of you Stockholm Syndrome Republicans out there, Democrats are your captors they are not your friends. Democrats declared war on your Party in 2000 and have tarnished the image of President Bush with an all out war of politics of personal destruction.
Democrats have waged a war against the war in Iraq attempt to lose that war so that they could win political victories at home. Allow me to make this clear, Democrats were willing to lose in Iraq, to actually hurt America in order to win the 2008 elections.
Democrats have waged political guerrilla warfare in Congress preventing president Bush and the Republican majority from putting forth a Conservative agenda when they were in power and Democrats have completely hindered President Bush from appointing conservative judges at the state and federal levels.
Sen. McCain and Gov. Schwarzenegger
So lets review Democrats have attacked and maimed a sitting President to the point that his whole Party is now vilified. Democrats caused the biggest financial meltdown in recent history by their actions in Congress and were able to pin this financial debacle on the Bush Administration. And Democrats repeatedly attempted to lose the war in Iraq to win political points.
So tell me how in light of such treachery and blood lust for power which Democrats have displayed, even at the expense of losing our county, are Republicans supposed to now join hands with Democrats and sing “Cumbiya my Lord!”
A very prominent Radio talk show host and early supporter of Sen. McCain (notice that I didn’t say Conservative, though he claims that he is) is suggesting that Conservatives give the new President-elect Barack Obama a chance, that maybe Barack will govern from the center and be inclusive of all Americans.
What this poor sufferer of Stockholm Syndrome doesn’t realize is that captors hold all the power and sure they can seem to be gracious and sure you can fall in love with your captors and even fight for their cause but there’s just one small reality.
YOUR VALUES, YOUR CAUSES HAVE BEEN DEFEATED! You are a slave you idiot! You are a puppet vowing to work with an enemy that hates Republicans and everything that they stand for ala Howard Dean. (See Politics of Hate)
Yes I saw the dreadful photo op of John McCain and Barack Obama and I heard that McCain promised to work with the Obama administration. So why should Sen. McCain deviate from the norm? He has always worked with enemy captors in his Senate career where do you think the label Maverick came from?
Democrats won in 2006 and 2008 because they would not relent and they would not give up on their principles, as bad for the country as they are.
For Republicans to now talk about working with Democrats as Democrats implement their socialist agenda for the country is a severe symptom of Stockholm Syndrome and any Republican acting in this way is psychologically compromised and should not be listened too or followed.
That Stockholm Syndrome suffers should be recaptured and deprogrammed immediately before the damage is permanent.
You will be able to tell quite easily which Republicans have not been affected with Stockholm Syndrome. They will be the Republicans who are not talking about giving Barack Obama the chance that Democrats didn’t give President Bush.
Also they will be the ones laying out a clear plan on how to fight the coming socialization of our country until we can reclaim the government back from the Socialist.
Arnold Schwarzenegger, John McCain, Lindsey Graham and others like them are SSRs and should not be listened to at all until they are recaptured and deprogramming is accomplished.
Barack Obama tours his ancestral homeland Kenya, with his grandmother, Sarah Obama, in August 2006.
To the tune of American Pie:
Bye, bye the American way Elected a Kenyan to the white house with no one to say The constitution’s been shredded there’s no more America day And this will be the way this country dies This will be the day America dies…
But when ye shall see the abomination of desolation, […] standing where it ought not, (let him that readeth understand,) then let them that be in Judaea flee to the mountains:--Mark 13:14
Somewhere in an East Cost Vermont town a community is being torn apart because some in that community wish for the pledge of allegiance to this country to be reinstated in their schools while others do not. (see story)
Somewhere on the West costal state of California homosexuals protest in the streets because democracy worked when they would have much preferred the Oligarchical rule of the courts to impose non-constitutional mandates for legalized anal sex against the democratic will of the people.(see story)
Somewhere in Washington D.C. Democrats who were primarily responsible for the lack of oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac the mortgage institutions which caused the world-wide financial meltdown are all a joy that they were able to convince the American people that the economic fiasco was President Bush’s fault. And in addition they were able to increase their power in Congress all at the expense of “W”, Republicans and the American people.
And somewhere in Chicago Illinois a president-elect is awaiting inauguration. He was born of the corrupt chi-town political machine and had Tony Rezko, William Ayers and Saul Alinsky as his political mentors. His allegiance to this country has been questioned as well as his birth and he has answered neither to the satisfaction of half of the American people.
To date he has refused to assuage the doubts about his birth and his citizenship which will forever taint his victory and his administration. If he is in fact an American natural born citizen as the Constitution so mandates it is Barack Obama highest duty to show the American people that he is constitutionally eligible to be sworn in as 44th president of the United States of America.
Though Americans’ interests seem to be torn between dishonoring American traditions and homosexual sex, let me assure you that there is nothing more important to the welfare of this country, not the right to be non-patriotic in Vermont, or the right to have anal sex in California or the right to the politics of personal destruction where one Party totally destroys the sitting President of the other Party and calls it their right to debate and disagree ala Sen. Hillary Clinton, nothing is more important than preserving our constitution.
If the majority of Americans are more concerned with non-patriotism, anal sex and the politics of deceit and destruction, then there is no wonder a Kenyan can be elected President of the United States of America with no one in America who feels that they have the responsibility to protect the Constitution and the American people against this possible fraud. If Barack Obama is inaugurated before the matter of his citizenship is cleared up then…
This is far worst than the day the music died, This inauguration day, January 20th, will truly be the day that America and its Constitution died.
In a stunning loss in California homosexuals were handed perhaps what they must consider somewhat of a death blow to their movement. That would explain the outdated 70’s street marches, the visceral violent reactions against enemies both real and imagined and the sudden violent, bigoted actions of these homosexuals.
First, watch this homosexual mad mob jostles this Palms Springs, California elderly woman, Phyllis Burgess, 68, who blew kisses as the homosexual mob virtually called for her death. Also notice how the biased media reported “hate on both sides” when clearly the only “hate” demonstrated was religious hate and violent protest emanating only from the homosexual mob as illustrated by their actions.
They assaulted Ms. Burgess by grabbing a cross out of her hand and in a show of religious hate and desecration they stomped that cross into the ground. (see video)
Apparently California’s Prop 8 loss was so devastating to the advancement of the homosexual agenda that homosexuals feel they must radicalize to the extreme in order to prevent any other states from joining in like suit along with California by allowing the people a say in opposing the well crafted homosexual agenda which uses courts and state legislatures to force legalized homosexuality on the majority of Americans who oppose it.
To date homosexual strategies successfully blocked out the people by co-opting courts, politicians and corporations to implement their agenda. That’s exactly what was intended in California however the state’s ballot initiative process prevented the California State Supreme Court from stealing the people’s rights earlier this year when the court struck down proposition 22, when a majority of four black robed surrogates for the homosexual movement legislated from the bench and created a new unconstitutional homosexual right never intend by the framers of the California constitution or anyone else in human history, for that matter!
What proposition 8 did was restore people’s rights. How? The people of California took back their constitution from a severely compromised Oligarchical homosexual favoring California court and legislature by amending their constitution to say what everyone knew it meant from the beginning marriage is and has always been uniting man and woman.
In light of this and because homosexuals could not have their way they have absolutely gone mad! They have lashed out against religion, the democratic system, private citizens (who have exercised their constitutional right to vote and contribute in the manner which they chose) and a little old lady.
This is behavior that would be consider hate crime in the least or terrorism at worst by any other group or persons but homosexuals are given a free pass to promote their post elect reign of terror and voter intimidation to whit a private citizen was harassed into resigning because of his support for proposition 8.
Scott Eckern, artistic director for the California Musical Theatre, resigned Wednesday as a growing number of artists threatened to boycott the organization because of his $1,000 donation to the campaign to ban gay marriage in California.
"I understand my supporting of Proposition 8 has been the cause of many hurt feelings, maybe even betrayal," Eckern said in a written statement. "I chose to act upon my belief that the traditional definition of marriage should be preserved."(see story)
Tell me what kind of country have we become when we can not support what we believe and contribute to the causes that we believe in?
Homosexual are no better than bigots that would attack them when homosexuals attack little old ladies like Phyllis Burgess and when they force men like Scott Eckern from jobs when Eckern and people like him vote for their beliefs. Now it is homosexuals who are the lawless bigots.
Photo by Bash Back of its own members, who disrupted a Michigan church service by flinging condoms around the sanctuary
Worshippers at a Bible-teaching church in Lansing, Mich., were stunned Sunday when members of a pro-homosexual, pro-anarchy organization named Bash Back interrupted their service to fling propaganda and condoms around the sanctuary, drape a profane banner from the balcony and feature two lesbians making out at the pulpit.—Bob Unruh
No longer just satisfied with using phony civil rights arguments before homo-sympathetic judges before this nation’s courts, radical homosexual anarchist have decided to win the hearts and minds of America’s youth by storming churches and freeing the youth from what homosexuals consider repressive biblical teachings that conflict with modern day ideology about sexuality and freedoms. All of this in the name of equal rights while totally disregarding the Church’s constitutional guaranteed freedom of religion. (see story) and (here)
An anarchist Gay-Qaeda group by the name of “Bash Back” attacked a Lansing Michigan church, the Mount Hope Church, outside and inside of the church last Friday in a coordinated attack meant to strike fear in the Christian community because the church teaches biblical faith principles regarding homosexuality.
Bash Back views Christian doctrinal teaching regarding homosexuality in direct opposition of the homosexual agenda and detrimental to the movements use of this nations courts to legitimize homosexuality.
What should have been a national story was hardly reported locally by homosexual allies in the media as found by Jason Goldtrap, who a novelist himself, thought it peculiar that very little media coverage existed. (see video)
However posted below is an interview of a person who is identified only as Andy who is speaking as a representative of Bash Back. This interview was taken by Todd Heywood and is very revealing concerning Bash Back’s intentions particularly and the homosexual agenda in general. When asked why Bash Back violated the church Andy's claim was that they did it to de-brainwash the youth.
Click the play button below to hear an interview with Andy from Bash Back! done by Todd Heywood.
Requires Adobe Flash Player. IE users may need to click play twice for the player to start. (interview 13:43mins)
Also this link is to one of the flyers that were distributed inside the church alone with condoms. (see flyer)
What should became clear to anyone with traditional values is that Gay-Qaeda has declared war by means of the courts, attacks through media and now direct attacks against religion.
The Homosexual left is emboldened with every court decision found in their favor and this issue will never be over until their attacks are met with equal strength and defeated by truth.
Are you willing to do for the truth what homosexuals are willing to do for a lie?
The election was held and Barack Obama will be the 44th President but it is not over. We still will be feeling the repercussions of how Obama won and the lack of knowledge that many Americans have about the U.S. Constitution. This lack of knowledge starts in our schools. (see story)
This shocking footage of video shows a teacher at work forcing her political views on her 5th grade class notice how the little girl who said that she would vote for John McCain is bullied by embarrassing her into total submission by her teacher. (see video)
Diatha D. Harris a former teacher of Mary McArthur Elementary School of Ashevelle, Cumberland County schools of North Carolina ridicules little defenseless 5th grade students to the point of total exasperation and embarrassment because they don’t share her political views.
Just think if this teacher has views on sexuality or any other controversial subject it would only be safe if her students did not express views that she doesn’t share.
Doing damage control the Superintendent of Cumberland County Schools made this statement:
Text of statement by CCS’ Superintendent Dr. William C. Harrison:
I was shocked when I saw the clip of an interaction between a Cumberland County Schools teacher and her students as posted on YouTube. While neutral discussion of the political process is appropriate, at no time, particularly with elementary students, should a teacher infuse his/her political views into the discussion. Most disconcerting was the military slant that made its way into this discussion. We are a military community, serving over 15,000 military students and their families. We value the sacrifices, not only of the military parents but also those of their families.
We believe that military children are our children, military spouses are many of our employees, and military service men and women are our heroes. We proudly serve our military children and have received national awards for our support of military families.
I was particularly disturbed to see the uncomfortable position in which our children were placed due to the inappropriate actions of one of our teachers. Please be assured that the actions exhibited in this video are not consistent with the vision of the CCS. Moreover, the actions of one teacher do not represent the 7000 employees in our organization.
Once the video was brought to my attention, I immediately launched an investigation. Personnel laws prevent me from releasing information regarding individual employees and personnel action taken. I can assure you that upon completion of the investigation, I will take appropriate action.
Dr. William Harrison CCS’ Superintendent
Finally in the above statement from the Cumberland County Superintendent of Schools he attempted to mitigate this situation by suggesting that Ms. Harris is an exception and not the rule.
But is that really true? Aren’t our children being indoctrinated daily with Liberal ideology? Aren’t traditional values being attacked K-12 and on college campuses all throughout the United States.
America just elected a person President who may not have met the constitutional requirement of being a natural born citizen and because of the education or lack of education of the general populist 52% of you didn’t know that or you just don’t care that the constitution could have possibly been violated.
If either is the case we’ve go a lot of work to do, first to reclaim our education system and then to reclaim our nation.
Please feel free to contact any of the following school officials to voice your concern about the education system. (see contacts)
June St. Clair Atkinson State Superintendent of Public Instruction 919.807.3430
Phyllis West Senior Policy Advisor to the State Superintendent 919.807.3434
Monique Wertis Special Assistant 919.807.3432
Priscilla Weber Special Assistant 919.807.3436
Mary McArthur Elementary School 3809 Village Drive Fayetteville, NC 28304 Phone:(910) 424-2206 Fax: (910) 424-3451
Lola B. Williams Principal http://www.mmes.ccs.k12.nc.us/email/lolabwilliams.htm
Anyone would think we had just elected a hip, skinny and youthful replacement for God, with a plan to modernise Heaven and Hell – or that at the very least John Lennon had come back from the dead.
The swooning frenzy over the choice of Barack Obama as President of the United States must be one of the most absurd waves of self-deception and swirling fantasy ever to sweep through an advanced civilisation. At least Mandela-worship – its nearest equivalent – is focused on a man who actually did something. –Peter Hitchens, Mail Online
So says Peter Hitchens of the United Kingdom. These are sentiments which I wholeheartedly agree with. This world-wide Barack Hussein Obama adulation is eerily reminiscence of eschatological prophecy where all people will worship a certain one and become a one world government. (See story)
Hitchens states that to America’s detriment it has finally switched sides in a global cultural war by electing Barack Obama as President. He assesses that America, once uniquely a deeply conservative people, had not made the mistakes of socialism that had ruined the rest of the world. But now America is no different than the rest of the world by electing this unknown political Marxist Socialist
Proper books, recording his (Obama's) sordid associates, his cowardly voting record, his astonishingly militant commitment to unrestricted abortion and his blundering trip to Africa, are little-read and hard to find.
If you can believe that this undistinguished and conventionally Left-wing machine politician is a sort of secular saviour, then you can believe anything.
Finally Hitchens bemoans the fading sovereignty, the fading unabashed Christianity, the fading resistance to politically correct claims of Global warming all of these strengths are dimming from America.
But Hitchens’ most poignant observation was that Conservatives failed to fight for their traditions, they failed to fight for America.
They [American’s traditions and strengths] had also been weakened by the failure of America’s conservative party – the Republicans – to fight on the cultural and moral fronts.
And so at last, the bright shining light on the hill has faded and now it is at best a European satellite awaiting the new Euro-American President Barack Hussein Obama to join the “people of the world” and the United Nations in a Global world economy and Global tax system.
Before resting from the grueling presidential race, John McCain began discussing with senior aides what role he will play in the Senate now that he has promised to work with the man who defeated him for president.
Democrats, who padded their majorities in the House and Senate, have a suggestion: McCain can mediate solutions to partisan standoffs on key legislation as he did to help avert a constitutional meltdown over judicial confirmations in 2005.
"There's a need for the old John McCain, a leader who worked in a bipartisan way," Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said Wednesday.
What? The Old John McCain? As you know John McCain has been masquerading for several months now as the Republican nominee for President of the United States of America. And if you are anything like me you’ve been wondering why Sen. McCain would never really pull the trigger, you know go after Barack Obama like he wanted to win the Presidency. (see story)
Sen. Obama had not qualms or reservations about going after Sen. McCain, President Bush or the Republicans!
Well I guess Charles Schumer’s opened arm welcome of McCain back into the Senate fold explains why McCain ran a John McCain’t campaign.
It seems to me that Sen. McCain was hedging his bets, in case that new job thingy didn’t workout for him. Well, you know, he didn’t want to burn any bridges now.
So Sen. McCain ran the most non-offensive campaign ever in campaign history.
Many times Sen. McCain came to his opponent’s defense when the nasty old lady partisans in his Party said that they were afraid of Sen. Obama and that they believed that he was a closet Muslim.
Sen. McCain would have none of that and he quickly spring into action and he rebuked any old lady who would say such a thing. Always assuring everyone that his opponent was a good man, a decent man, a family man, oh and did Sen. McCain fail to mention that his opponent would be the next president? He should have.
But that aside now we see why John McCain would run such a campaign, Sen. McCain wanted Chucky Schumer’s love! ‘Oh came back to us old Johnny boy and do what you’ve always done, be that Maverick that we’ve come to know and love and poke those bad Republicans in the eye. Here’s your old spot back!’
So Democrats want McCain to come back and mediate solutions to partisan standoffs on key legislation like he did to help avert a constitutional meltdown over judicial confirmations in 2005. Wink, wink! And Democrats want John McCain to work in a bipartisan way.
Let’s be totally straight talk express right here, John McCain’s work in the Senate screwed Republicans. We all know that. And “Democrat speak” for bipartisanship is ‘We are in control now and Republicans had better go along with it or we’ll put John McCain back on Meet the Press to explain why the Republicans are out of touch with the American people.’
There I hope that clears up why John McCain ran such a pathetic campaign and why Democrats would welcome him back warmly after what should have been a bitterly fought election.
Hey, didn’t the McCain, Lindsey Graham, Trent Lott, and George Bush wing of the Republican Party tell us that all that we had to do is be more inclusive and less Conservative and we would be able to win? Whatever happened to that theory? And didn’t I say way back in January that Independents and Democrats would not support John McCain in the General election against a Democrat?
Sure McCain won New Hampshire and South Carolina but that was only on the strength of Independent and Democrat votes. Are Independents and Democrats going to support McCain in a contest against an Obama or Hillary candidate for President? One word answer… NO!-- Alaphiah
I’ll tell you what happened to that theory it decimated the Conservative base. The so-called Moderate to Liberal go-along-to get-along wing of the Republican Party put up John McCain and it didn’t work. McCain’s campaign didn’t work.
As I said in January McCain’s campaign was a “Dead Campaign Walking,” his campaign was a pathetic display of ineptitude and self Republican flagellation and the only bright spot was the selection of Sarah Palin who showed that she knew who the enemy was and it wasn’t us Conservatives!
Conservatives must move to reclaim the Republican Party from Stockholm syndrome Republicans such as John McCain and Lindsey Graham(see story)
Run back to Chucky Schumer Johnny like a good little Maverick but don’t expect any adulation from the Party that you threw under the bus because you preferred to be called bipartisan rather than truly fighting for the opportunity to be called the President of the United States of America!
"You can't change the definition of something that existed forever because you don't like it."-- Meg Waters, part of the Yes on 8 campaign team
November 5, 2008 will be forever remembered as the day that homosexuals “came out” to America showing everyone what their true intentions really are. They are anarchist who will stop at nothing to get their way. They are out of control children throwing a public tantrum because the grown ups in the society wouldn’t allow them to play Russian roulette with AIDS and HIV and call such play marriage. (see story)
And homosexuals intend to remake reality and human history whether the 97% of us like it or not.
In the span of thirty years homosexuality has gone from being a socially unacceptable sexual deviance to becoming simply a choice that school children as early as kindergarten must learn about and accept just as another crayola in their multicolored crayon boxes. Only thing is, most parents feel that this particular crayon is lead based and shouldn’t be played with by children
That aside, after years of legal coercion arguing false civil rights claims before courts in America and after years of attempting to persuade Americans that homosexuality is the “new normal” through surrogates Rosie O’Donnell, Ellen DeGeneres and Will and Grace it all comes down to rioting in the streets for homosexuals as ironically they protest the very electoral process that gave America it’s very first Black president.
After years of homosexual indoctrination in schools by pro-homosexual agitation groups, Gay-Straight Alliance, etc. and after years of homosexual propaganda in movies and television it has come down to homosexual thugs roaming the streets of Los Angeles and San Francisco spouting hate speech and committing hate crimes against the church. Spray painting churches that's a hate crime, disparaging religious faith that's hate speech. (see video)
The polling statistics clearly shows that the same people who voted for Barack Obama to be president of the United States, are the same Californians who voted yes on proposition 8 which defines marriage, as it has always been known throughout human existence, uniting man and woman. Yes on 8 changes nothing it only preserves the status quo.
Statistics also show that Whites voted overwhelmingly NO on 8 where Blacks and Hispanics voted YES.
In addition to that the hundreds of millions of dollars that homosexuals, their corporate sponsors and NO on 8 groups spent on defeating the people’s will in California should not go unnoticed.
And neither should government officials; San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, Senator Dianne Feinstein, California Attorney General Jerry Brown, California Superintendent of Schools Jack O’Connell and California Supreme Court Justices Ronald M. George, Carlos R. Moreno, Kathryn Mickle Werdegar and Joyce Kennard or the many City Councils throughout the State of California they should all be dealt with for their part in creating this social mayhem.
It was their combined actions that brought about the anarchy that prevail in the streets of California. These leaders were and are all wrong in the positions that they hold regarding homosexuality but to openly and unabashedly promote their person beliefs and attempt to force those beliefs on the general society is simple unconscionable.
These officials are supposed to be representative of the will of the people yet they oppose what the people of California know to be true and legal, 61% of the people in the year 2000 defined marriage as uniting man and woman and here in the year 2008 52% of the people of California says that marriage is the uniting of a man and a woman constitutionally.
If any of you, as a representative of the people, feel that you cannot support the legitimate cast constitutional votes of the people of California and the electoral system by which they cast them, then the whole lot of you should kindly step down to save this bankrupted State the money it would take to remove your non-representative bodies from office!
If you don’t feel that you need to step down and if you continue to misrepresent your office and the people of this state, we will be all too happy to remove you from office with the same majority that voted to support marriage as it has been defined all throughout human experience, uniting man and woman.
Finally, the people of California will not be intimidated by street protest whether they are hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens marching in our streets demanding illegitimate rights or whether they are a few hundred homosexuals and their advocates demanding that society change because they are confused about their own sexuality. The people have seen this fake “rights” grab before and we’re not buying it!
We said in no uncertain terms by vote that just because 3% of the population is confused about their sexuality doesn’t mean that the rest of us have to be confused as well. And we will not allow your small percentage to force your sexual confusion onto the majority by legal coercion and/or court mandated political Fascism.
Also if you intend to intimidate any church or religious group with hate speech or hate legislation we will remember the corporate sponsors who fund your attacks against the church, the family and the institution of marriage; Aetna , Agilent Technologies, Alston & Bird, American Airlines ,American Express , Apple Computer ,AT&T , Avaya , Bausch & Lomb , Best Buy , Borders Group , BP America , California State Automobile Association ,Capital One Financial , Cargill , Charles Schwab, Chevron, ChoicePoint, Chubb, Cisco Systems, Citigroup, CMP Media , Corning , Credit Suisse First Boston, Cummins, Daimler Chrysler , Dell, Deutsche Bank, Dominion Resources , Dow Chemical , Eastman Kodak , Ernst & Young , Estee Lauder Companies , Faegre & Benson , Ford Motor Co. ,Freescale Semiconductor, Gap Inc. ,General Mills , GlaxoSmithKline , Global Hyatt , Goldman Sachs Group , Hewlett-Packard , Intel , IBM , Intuit , J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. , Jenner & Block , Johnson & Johnson , Kaiser Permanente , Keyspan , Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group , KPMG , Kraft Foods , Lehman Brothers Holdings , Levi Strauss & Co. , Lexmark International , Lincoln National , Lucent Technologies , Mellon Financial , Merrill Lynch , MetLife , Microsoft , Miller Brewing , Mitchell Gold and Bob Williams , Molson Coors Brewing , Morrison & Foerster ,Motorola ,Nationwide , NCR Corp. , New York Times Co. , Nike , Nordstrom , Northern Trust ,The Olivia Companies , Owens Corning , Pepsico , Pfizer , PG&E , Prudential Financial , Raytheon , Replacements , SBC Communications , SC Johnson & Son , Sears, Roebuck and Co. , Southern California Edison , Sprint , Sun Microsystems ,SunTrust Banks ,Tech Data Corp. , Toyota , UBS ,Unisys , US Airways, Viacom , Walgreens , Washington Mutual ,Wells Fargo ,Whirlpool ,Worldspan Technologies ,Wyndham International ,Xerox.
In the two separate interviews which follow Charlie Rose broaches the subject of president-elect Barack Obama.
First in this October 30, 2008 interview just five day away from the election he and Tom Brokaw admit that they or no one for that matter knows anything about Sen. Barack Obama. (see video 4:08mins)
Barack Obama, we know him because of he’s been the public view for a long time he is principally known through his autobiography and through very aspirational speeches… exactly two of them, two books. What do you make of him?—Charlie Rose
And then, Editor of Newsweek Jon Meacham and Newsweek Editor-at-large Evan Thomas discuss with Charlie Rose November 5, 2008 Saul Alinsky who was a mentor to Barack Obama.
Sen. Obama employed methodology from Alinsky’s book “Rules for Racials” in his campaign with which Sen. Obama duped the American people into electing him without Americans knowing anything about him.
One such idea was to focus on the middle class which Sen. Obama did. Really now, didn't anyone think that the middle class just might have wanted to know that they were been used by Sen. Obama just to get elected?
Alinsky dedicated his book in this manner: “Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer
Yes that’s right a dedication to the devil. How special!
He is very elusive, Obama. Which is fascinating for a man who has written two memoirs he is the chief custodial of the story of Obama, he is a stand alone brand.
I was very struck watching the stage craft and this comes out again and again in the project in Grand Park he walks out with the family and then they go away. Biden’s back you know locked in the bar or something you know they don't let him out.
And have you ever seen a victory speech where there no one else on stage, no adoring wife no cute kid he is the messenger. —Jon Meacham
There is a slightly creepy cult personality about all of this, I mean he such an admirable… it just make me little uneasy that he is so singular.
He’s clearly managing his own spectacle, he knows how to do it he’s I think a deeply manipulative guy, now this could be a useful thing in a leader—Evan Thomas (this is a must see video 20:19mins)
It is pathetic to think that a small army of reporters were sent to Alaska to investigate Gov. Palin before the election and we know all that we need to know about Joe the Plumber before the election, however in contrast, before the election the media did not investigate Sen. Barack Obama at all. And now they want to discuss him?
These discussions are too little to late and I’m sure the American people would have appreciated this kind of information before they elected some slightly creepy cult personality to be president of the United States of America.
Thanks for nothing Mr. Brokaw, Mr. Meacham and Mr. Thomas the whole lot of ya, and the so-called Mainstream Media!
I can't believe that ABC NEWS is still putting out 'hit pieces' on Sarah Palin. They must really be worried that she is going to mount a major comeback in 2012, and figure that they can derail that possibility now.
What purpose does it serve to have a supposedly respected "News Channel" air a segment based on "rumored accusations by unnamed sources" and call it news? But that has been the recent history of ABC, so who's surprised?
This just goes to FOX NEWS' Sean Hannity's accusation that "journalism died in 2008". Why don't they spend the airtime concentrating on the facts that Obama is already in the process of "letting the public down easy", by revising his many, unrealistic promises, down to reasonable levels. But you won't see that from ABC..... it's too difficult to expose fraud, when that fraud was originally perpetrated by themselves.
Californians celebrating righting the wrong of the California Supreme Court ruling on protecting the sanctity of marriage
Let this be a teachable moment for anyone who is confused about sexuality, according to the California Constitution marriage is officially defined between a man and a woman.
Let this also be a teachable moment for anyone who attempts to change our society through legal coercion and political Fascism by using the Courts and government to intrude into our bedrooms to do so. This will not be allowed and it is not acceptable even in the ultra Liberal state of California. (see story)and (here)
And let this be a teachable moment to the hubris men and women of the California Supreme Court who could have prevented the chaos of their own making by first respecting the legally voted mandate of the people in proposition 22 and after that by honoring the request for a stay of ruling until the vote on proposition 8 which was request after the California Supreme Court ill-advisedly overturned the will of the people early this year.
Nevertheless, homosexuals, their supporters and their activists attempted to use the courts to ramrod their personal confusions and beliefs on our society in general.
This round started for California with the lawlessness of San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom’s blatant disregard for his office and the rule of law. Newsom took the law into his own hands to force his beliefs about homosexuality on the State of California.
Newsom meant to create chaos in the law and to create an irretrievable point where his acts would be irreversible. Rightly the courts ruled that Newsom’s activities where illegal and in violation of the state constitution and voided out his handiwork. Marriages conducted by the City of San Francisco were declared invalid by the court.
The same must be done with the chaos that the California Supreme Court has purposely caused and all marriages that were entered in under the specter that proposition 8 would be approved must be voided as well. Some believe that the Courts did not allow the requested stay in order to create legal chaos.
Four homosexual advocates on the California Supreme Court, Ronald M. George, Carlos R. Moreno, Kathryn Mickle Werdegar and Joyce Kennard went along with a Orwellian suspension of logic, human history, and Constitutional law by ruling that the eight years old, Californian ballot initiative which 61% of Californians voted into law to define marriage as being only between a man and a woman was unconstitutional.
The California Supreme Court overturned the year 2000 ballot measure, Proposition 22, in the court’s decision May 15 of this year thereby legalizing homosexual mock marriages. Interestingly though they cited that marriage had always been understood to be between a man and a woman according to the State Constitution but they went on to invent a Constitution standing anyway.
Writing for the majority Chief Justice Ronald M. George noted:
First, we must determine the nature and scope of the “right to marry” –a right that past cases establish as one of the fundamental constitutional rights embodied in the California Constitution. Although, as an historical matter, civil marriage and the rights associated with it traditionally have been afforded only to opposite-sex couples…”—Justice Ronald M. George
So how did the California Court get around its own Constitution? By legal jujitsu according to dissenting Justice Marvin Baxter and here’s how they did it, first the four person majority on the court found a fundamental constitutional right to form a family relationship and in addition to that they ruled California Constitution properly must be interpreted to guarantee this basic civil right to all Californians.
The court further found that although our state Constitution does not contain any explicit reference to a “right to marry,” past California cases establish beyond question that the right to marry is a fundamental right whose protection is guaranteed to “all persons” and here’s the legal jujutsu Justice Ronald George had already stated that, as an historical matter, civil marriage and the rights associated with it traditionally have been afforded only to opposite-sex couples.
But what the majority did was redefine historical understanding with the Orwellian phrase “all persons” and by this legal jujutsu they were able to rule that all persons means gay and straight in additional to man and woman. Simply outrageous!
To which Justice Baxter dissented noted:
I cannot join this exercise in legal jujitsu, by which the Legislature’s own weight is used against it to create a constitutional right from whole cloth, defeat the People’s will, and invalidate a statute otherwise immune from legislative interference. … The majority has violated these principles. It simply does not have the right to erase, then recast, the age-old definition of marriage, as virtually all societies have understood it, in order to satisfy its own contemporary notions of equality and justice. (Page 134)
Therefore what the Majority has done, as it was already established with Mayor Gavin Newsom, must be undone and any homosexual marriage resulting because of their ruling must be declared legally null and void to confirm what the will of the people has always been they must do so because the Courts ruling was capricious, arbitrary and not based on the California Constitution. No homosexual marriage should be allowed to hide under the false legal blind which the Court created by its own prejudice and hubris.
Thus the May 15, 2008 ruling was an improper use of judicial authority. Four justices substituted their own prejudices and opinion for law and in an act of judicial tyranny mandated their own desires upon the people of California. Consequently, the people of California were able to cast off this tyrannous, onerous and oppressive ruling therefore no trace of its making should be allowed to remain.
Thomas Jefferson knowing that this day was inevitable for the United States of America wrote in his Bill establishing Religious Freedom in Virginia:
[T]he opinions of men are not the object of civil government, nor under its jurisdiction; that to suffer the civil magistrate to intrude his powers into the field of opinion and to restrain the profession or propagation of principles on supposition of their ill tendency is a dangerous fallacy, which at once destroys all religious liberty, because he being of course judge of that tendency will make his opinions the rule of judgment, and approve or condemn the sentiments of others only as they shall square with or differ from his own; that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order; and finally, that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself; that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate; errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them. —Thomas Jefferson, Bill Establishing Religious Freedom in the State of Virginia, 1786
Jefferson argued that opinions, including those of religion, but nevertheless men’s opinions should not be the object of civil government.
In other words whatever your opinion is on homosexuality, it should not be made a government matter. However that is exactly what the Courts and proponents if homosexual rights and homosexual mock marriage did they used government courts to impose their opinions on the rest of society.
What about marriage doesn’t the sexuality confused and their allies in the government and the courts understand? It is the same as it ever was a union between a man and a woman.
Yet after a shocking defeat in one of the most Liberal leaning states in the union homosexuals vow to never give up they will have their way no matter what and they have already filed another suit challenging the legitimate vote and the will of the people of California. Attorney Gloria Allred has filed suit in hopes to once again void out millions of constitutional cast votes however this must not be allowed and it must never happen again. (see video)
In 2000 the people of California defined marriage for its citizens in ballot initiative proposition 22. That wasn’t good enough for a small minority who is confused about their sexuality and wishes to convey this confusion on the general society.
Obviously attempting to make a name for himself, Mayor Gavin Newsom took the law into his own hands and illegality ordered the City of San Francisco to conduct illegal and unconstitutional weddings under his auspices. In response the courts ruled him in violation of the law.
In May of this year the California Supreme Court over turned proposition 22 creating state sponsored homosexuality and mock marriages
November 4, 2008 the people of California restored their rights under the Constitution and amended the California State Constitution with the definition of marriage for the state to be between a man and a woman.
Today homosexuals and their allies still fight against the will of the people. Therefore the people will have to continue to fight and remain ever vigilant to protect their rights and to protect what they know to be true.
Marriage by definition, law and history is the union of man and woman only.
For Heaven's sake, stop pinning all those laurels on Barack Obama, for his "fantastic" win. Was it ever in doubt???
The liberal media "anointed" him early on, and the liberal "academics" shoved him down the throats of their students. They indoctrinated them, the way they have perverted the educational system to the very way that Obama encourages........with both verbal and financial support.
Now...........that he has been "anointed" president, we should all bow to those on the far left, and puke in their laps.God help this country, now that we have the wacko liberals so nicely entrenched in DC.
Another thing that just rubs me the wrong way, is Obama's claim to being "black"......... another ruse fostered on the American voter. He is black strictly by choice, in his own words, in his own books. He long ago separated himself from the 50% white blood of his mother, and the 12 1/2% arab blood that runs through his veins from his paternal grandfather, and decided that his37 1/2% black blood, was the crucial link to success.
Being a very smart, though dishonest politician.......... a student of the Chicago political machine where he learned at the hands of the masters of corruption and deceit. He figured that "being white"would make him 'just one of the guys', "being arab" would not help him one bit in this present world environment, BUT "being black" would get him the support of all the blacks in the United States,, (which it actually did) and the far left who would bend over backwards to support "a brother".
This election was a farce from the start, and will come back to haunt the Democratic party........ maybe in as little as 4 years. It might start as early as the next Congressional elections. The American people love to see the underdog prevail, but not when they are deceived.
It took them three elections but they’ve finally done what they set out to do. Democrats have defeated President George W. Bush.
Oh he wasn’t running and he didn’t campaigning in 2008 but you wouldn’t have known that from the campaign that Sen. Barack Obama and the Democrat leadership ran. In the record 10 months that this campaign took George Bush’s name was invoked in vain more than the Pope prays.
Democrat’s campaign strategy was to make this presidential campaign about George Bush and they accomplished that. They can’t defeat him in 2000 and they didn’t defeat him in 2004 so they defeated him symbolically in absentia in 2008 and that’s just as good as a real win for Democrats.
So now that George Bush is finally defeated and Democrats won’t have him to kick around anymore who are they going to blame when they are in power and they actually receive what they’ve asked for?
They asked for the presidency and control of congress and now they’ve got it. Are they, through their media friends, going to make excuses about why they can’t deliver on their promises to fix the economy and promote peace and goodwill throughout the world?
If we are attacked January 21st or 22nd as Vice President elect Joseph Biden has predicted will George Bush be blamed? He better not be!
According to Liberals who blame president Bush for everything that happen during his presidency, Bush wouldn’t have anything to do with a 21st or 22nd attack because as Biden pointed out if Obama is elected the world will test him (Obama) and that has nothing to do with any previous policies of the Bush administration that will be on Biden’s and Obama’s watch and if it should happen as Biden promised that it will, it will be completely because of Barack Obama not George W. Bush.
As Democrats, Liberals, Europeans, al Qaeda, Hamas, Iran, the United Nations, George Soros, Moveon.org, the Daily Kos and all other enemies of the United States savor this moment of victory over George Bush and celebrate George Bush’s defeat let us all turn our attention to the “anybody but Bush” that is going to be the 44th President of the United States of America.
What do you know about Senator and President elect Barack Hussein Obama? Where was he born? Is he a Natural born citizen of the United States of America? Is he even a citizen of the United States of America? Is he a Marxist socialist or a Socialist Marxist?
Just what is a civilian force that is just as well fund, just as strong and just as powerful as the U.S. military and why does Obama want one?
Does he intend to bankrupt coal mining industries and the states which produce coal, is he going to rid America of its nuclear weapons as he has promised? Will he subjugate the U.S. to an U.N. global tax under the only bill that he has authored in Congress, bill number S.2433, the Global poverty act of 2007 which would spread American tax payer's wealth around world-wide.
There are plenty of questions for a president elect who has his health, college and birth records sealed. Plenty of questions for someone who convinced the American people to vote for him not on the strength of his experience, he has none, not on his proven track record, there is no record.
The American people elected Barack Hussein Obama simply on hate not hope. It was because of hate of the White man that Senator Obama was elect that and because of his attacks against the Bush administration.
Democrats and Senator Obama defeated President George Bush. Like the saying goes, "The third time’s the charm." With that Conservatives are also defeated, we are beaten but not bowed. We will root out the failed Bush, McCain, Lindsey Graham Conservatives from the Party and rebuild for 2012 with the energized Sarah Palin Conservatives.
You know it’s occurred to me that instead of a farewell address President Bush should just concede the lost of the 2008 presidential race, he wasn’t running but boy did they run against him!
