Yet another example of the “elitist” Barack Obama!
While he talks the good talk, and even walks the
good walk, he runs with the far left wackos.
Obama loves being a celebrity, and that is what this
election is all about for him. He hangs with the liberal
likes of Barbra Streisand, who performed at a benefit
for his ticket last night. Thanks to her, and the other
wacko leftists in Hollywood, he raised another nine
million dollars for his campaign, in just one night.
His campaign thought it was a great idea, snuggling
up to the Hollywood “elite”, but I think that the photos
of him playing cozy-cozy with them, are going to
backfire on him.
How can he in good conscience, preach that he “understands”
what the people are going through in these tight times, and
then attend a lavish party in his honor? Especially when
they paid such an exorbitant price per plate. These are
the people that he feels most comfortable with. These are
the people that he can “preach” to, without the need for a
teleprompter..........because he is preaching to the choir.
He rubs shoulders with them, and then takes pot-shots at
the people in small towns....... where he has to use the
teleprompter, in order to stick to his “remarks” which were
prepared by professional speech writers. This is also the
reason that the refused John McCain’s offer of weekly
debates, in 'town hall format'............ because he is scared. Scared that the people will see that he is merely the stuffed shirt that is fronting for the far left in the Democratic party. A man with no principles, seeking the highest political office just because he wants the prestige, and screw the country and us.
Go on, Barack.........keep doing what you are doing. Have you noticed how each day, the poll numbers are changing. Even New Jersey has finally caught onto the fact that you are nothing.............. you offer nothing,............. you have nothing.
For the first time in four presidential elections, New Jersey is on the verge of voting Republican. I hope that when that happens, the people have the sense to sweep out of office the two liberal do-nothing Senators.........Lautenberg and Menendez.
Then maybe, without the obstructionists, we can proceed to
execute, not a change we can believe in, but that much “Needed Change”!
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
Obama’s Secret Negotiations in Iraq Violate Logan Act?
In an explosive revelation while Sen. Barack Obama was making all of those public pronouncements about immediate withdraw from Iraq, he was secretly going behind the back of Americans attempting to delay President Bush’s negotiation talks regarding withdraw from Iraq. (see story)
That’s right Barack Obama, the two-faced political animal that he is placed his political career above the interest of the American people and attempted to sabotage the Bush negotiations for troop withdraw from Iraq possibly violating the Logan Act (private citizens can not interfere in foreign affairs.)
Yet in Obama’s July European tour where he also toured Iraq he held private meetings in which Obama tried to persuade Iraqi leaders to delay an agreement on a draw-down of the American military presence.
According to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, Obama made his demand for delay a key theme of his discussions with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad in July.Whether or not this is prosecuted it should noted that Obama does put partisan politics above all else.
"He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington ," Zebari said in an interview. –Amir Taheri, New York Post
And of course, Obama still in his usual undermine the Bush administration at all cost mode told Zebari that it was in the interest of both sides not to have an agreement negotiated by the Bush administration in its “State of weakness and political confusion.”
Zebari said to Obama to Zebari’s credit that he preferred to have a security agreement that regulates the activities of foreign troops, rather than keeping the matter open.
Apparently the Iraqi leadership does not trust Sen. Obama, Iraqi President Jalal Talabani (whose party is a member of the Socialist International) sees Obama as "a man of the Left" - who, once elected, might change his opposition to Iraq's liberation.
Indeed, say Talabani's advisers, a President Obama might be tempted to appropriate the victory that America has already won in Iraq by claiming that his (Obama’s)intervention transformed (Bush) failure into (Obama) success.
[Prime Minister Nouri al-] Maliki's advisers have persuaded him that Obama will win - but the prime minister worries about the senator's "political debt to the anti-war lobby" - which is determined to transform Iraq into a disaster to prove that toppling Saddam Hussein was "the biggest strategic blunder in US history."—Amir TaheriObama has given Iraqis the impression that he doesn't want Iraq to appear anything like a success, let alone a victory, for America. The reason why?
Obama fears that the perception of US victory in Iraqi might revive the Bush Doctrine of "pre-emptive" war - that is, removing a threat before it strikes at America.
Despite some usual equivocations on the subject, Obama rejects pre-emption as a legitimate form of self -defense. To be credible, his foreign-policy philosophy requires Iraq to be seen as a failure, a disaster, a quagmire, a pig with lipstick or any of the other apocalyptic adjectives used by the American defeat industry in the past five years.
There can be no denying now that Democrat’s opposition to the war is primarily political and Sen. Obama and his Democrat Party would have lost the war to win the 2008 Presidential election.
The fact that President Bush has produced a victory in Iraq in spite of and against the opposition of the entire Democrat Party including Sen. Barack Obama proves that the Democrats were wrong in their attempts to subvert and undermine U.S. war efforts.
These charges alone should disqualify any Democrat candidate from becoming President especially Barack Hussein Obama!
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
The Democrats “Shell” Game!
In response to the deluge of emails, phone calls and faxes
to the Democratic Congress.............guess what?
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, have accepted defeat, without
saying it of course, and stated that they are about to present
their long-overdue and belated Energy Bill. Well.............
a bill of sorts, but certainly not an energy bill.
Those in the know, say that they will open up “offshore
drilling”, but not the way the public is demanding. Their
criteria will be no drilling within 50 miles of our shorelines.
That is to pacify the public, and still keep faith with the
environmentalists, who form a good chunk of the Democratic
party, and whom the Democratic Congress fears.
What good will that do, when 85% of the proven reserves are
only about 7 miles offshore? Why on earth do we have to
sail right over the bonanza, to drill in areas that have virtually
no oil worth pumping? This is the other side of the stupid
Democratic argument, that the oil companies should drill where
they already hold leases. But that wouldn’t work because
every time they tried to drill the wacky environmentalists
would file suit through their ally and supporter, the ACLU.
This is the Democratic Congress that made all those grandiose
promises to voters about bringing “change”. The only change
that happened in ‘06, was a change for the worse. Look back
and check on the facts. Without doubt........... this congress
has the all-time lowest approval rating of all time..... a mere 9%.
That is a disgrace.................. and yet we continue to reward them with the best life insurance policy, best pension plan, best medical
and dental coverage, in the entire world. .... at any price! We
pay for their hair salons and barber shops, and their free cafeteria.
We supply their limousine and their airplanes.
Is it so much to ask that they represent us in the fashion that
we are requesting? Who made them “gods” of our lives and
our fate? They work for us, but yet they feel that we are subject
to their whims...........like it or lump it!!!
Now............. they are offering more “change”....... God help us!
to the Democratic Congress.............guess what?
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, have accepted defeat, without
saying it of course, and stated that they are about to present
their long-overdue and belated Energy Bill. Well.............
a bill of sorts, but certainly not an energy bill.
Those in the know, say that they will open up “offshore
drilling”, but not the way the public is demanding. Their
criteria will be no drilling within 50 miles of our shorelines.
That is to pacify the public, and still keep faith with the
environmentalists, who form a good chunk of the Democratic
party, and whom the Democratic Congress fears.
What good will that do, when 85% of the proven reserves are
only about 7 miles offshore? Why on earth do we have to
sail right over the bonanza, to drill in areas that have virtually
no oil worth pumping? This is the other side of the stupid
Democratic argument, that the oil companies should drill where
they already hold leases. But that wouldn’t work because
every time they tried to drill the wacky environmentalists
would file suit through their ally and supporter, the ACLU.
This is the Democratic Congress that made all those grandiose
promises to voters about bringing “change”. The only change
that happened in ‘06, was a change for the worse. Look back
and check on the facts. Without doubt........... this congress
has the all-time lowest approval rating of all time..... a mere 9%.
That is a disgrace.................. and yet we continue to reward them with the best life insurance policy, best pension plan, best medical
and dental coverage, in the entire world. .... at any price! We
pay for their hair salons and barber shops, and their free cafeteria.
We supply their limousine and their airplanes.
Is it so much to ask that they represent us in the fashion that
we are requesting? Who made them “gods” of our lives and
our fate? They work for us, but yet they feel that we are subject
to their whims...........like it or lump it!!!
Now............. they are offering more “change”....... God help us!
Something to Ponder!
I can’t give credit to the person who wrote this, because
I have no idea where it started. I received it in an email
........... from a very long list of senders. Whoever this
person is, I congratulate you, for being a true American,
who remembers the way this country was, before it was
highjacked by the liberals.I pass it on to all of you to read, maybe copy, and send
it to some of your friends.
FIRST OF ALL, I HOPE EACH OF YOU WILL TAKE THE TIME TO READ THIS ENTIRE E-MAIL; WHETHER YOU ARE DEMOCRAT, REPUBLICAN OR INDEPENDENT MATTERS NOT. BUT MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WILL NEVER KNOW OF AMERICA'S PAST LOYALTY TO THIS GREAT COUNTRY, IF THEY DO NOT HEAR IT FROM THOSE OF US WHO SPEND THE TIME TO E-MAIL TO THOSE PEOPLE WE LOVE..........
It doesn't matter who you are, where you live, your religion, race, or sex. This is serious stuff. What a differ ence 60 years makes..!!!I know everyone has a different opinion on the war and our current President, But this article makes a lot of sense and I hope you will take 2 minutes and read it and give it some thought.
I have never seen the 'situation' expressed any better in words!
Recently I was talking to a friend about the upcoming election and the candidates. As we ended our discussion he said, 'The only decision you have to make is who you want sitting in that seat in the White House when - NOT IF - but 'when' we get hit again and millions of American lives are put at risk! You ain't gonna like losing.'
President Bush did make a bad mistake in the war on terrorism. But the mistake was not his decision to go to war in Iraq. Bush's mistake came in his belief that this country is the same one his father fought for in WWII. It is not.
Back then we had just come out of a vicious depression. The country was steeled by the hardship of that depression but they still believed fervently in this country. They knew that the people had elected their leaders so it was the people's duty to back those leaders.
Therefore when the war broke out the people came together, rallied behind and stuck w ith their leaders whether they had voted for them or not or whether the war was going badly or not.
And war was just as distasteful and the anguish just as great then as it is today. Often there were more casualties in one day in WWII than we have had in the entire Iraq war. But that did not matter. The people stuck with the President because it was their patriotic duty. Americans put aside their differences in WWII and worked together to win that war.
Everyone from every strata of society from young to old pitched in. Small children pulled little wagons around to gather scrap metal for the war effort. Grade school students saved their pennies to buy stamps for war bonds to help the effort. (Yes, we actually did these things 'back then')...........
Men who were too old or medically 4F lied about their age or condition trying their best to join the military. Women doubled their work to keep things going at home. Harsh rationing of everything from gasoline to soap to butter was imposed yet there was very little complaining. You never heard prominent people on the radio belittling the President. Interestingly enough in those days there were no fat cat actors and entertainers who ran off to visit and fawn over dictators of hostile countries and complain to them about our President. Instead they made upbeat films and entertained our troops to help the troops' morale. And a bunch even enlisted.
And imagine this: Teachers in schools actually started the day off with a Pledge of Allegiance and with prayers for our country and our troops! Back then no newspaper would have dared point out certain weak spots in our cities where bombs could be set off to cause the maximum damage. No newspaper would have dared complain about what we were doing to catch spies.
A newspaper would have been laughed out of existence if it had complained that German or Japanese soldiers were being 'tortured' by being forced to wear women's underwear or subjected to interrogation by a woman or being scared by a dog or did not have air conditioning.
There were a lot of things different back then We were not subjected to a constant bombardment of pornography, perversion, and promiscuity in movies or on radio. We did not have legions of crack heads, dope pushers, and armed gangs roaming our streets.
No, President Bush did not make a mistake in his handling of terrorism. He made the mistake of believing that we still had the courage and fortitude of our fathers. He believed that this was still the country that our fathers fought so dearly to preserve. It is not the same country. It is now a cross between Sodom and Gomorrah and the land of Oz. We did unite for a short while after 9/11, but our attitude changed when we found out that defending our country would require some sacrifices.
We are in great danger. The terrorists are fanatic Muslims. They believe that it is okay, even their duty to kill anyone who will not convert to Islam. It has been estimated that about one third or over three hundred million Muslims are sympathetic to the terrorists' cause... Hitler and Tojo combined did not have nearly that many potential recruits.
So... We either win it - or lose it - and you ain't gonna like losing.
America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall.
Take a couple of minutes to read this. Then I ask that you THINK ABOUT IT when you vote in November. Voting Democrat or Republican is most definitely YOUR CHOICE. Just remember what you have just read.
Send this to everyone you know, if you've got the guts to do it!!!
However, millions of the younger generations will not even know what this is all about.......all we can do is try to inform.....try to help in any way we can!
I have no idea where it started. I received it in an email
........... from a very long list of senders. Whoever this
person is, I congratulate you, for being a true American,
who remembers the way this country was, before it was
highjacked by the liberals.I pass it on to all of you to read, maybe copy, and send
it to some of your friends.
FIRST OF ALL, I HOPE EACH OF YOU WILL TAKE THE TIME TO READ THIS ENTIRE E-MAIL; WHETHER YOU ARE DEMOCRAT, REPUBLICAN OR INDEPENDENT MATTERS NOT. BUT MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WILL NEVER KNOW OF AMERICA'S PAST LOYALTY TO THIS GREAT COUNTRY, IF THEY DO NOT HEAR IT FROM THOSE OF US WHO SPEND THE TIME TO E-MAIL TO THOSE PEOPLE WE LOVE..........
It doesn't matter who you are, where you live, your religion, race, or sex. This is serious stuff. What a differ ence 60 years makes..!!!I know everyone has a different opinion on the war and our current President, But this article makes a lot of sense and I hope you will take 2 minutes and read it and give it some thought.
I have never seen the 'situation' expressed any better in words!
Recently I was talking to a friend about the upcoming election and the candidates. As we ended our discussion he said, 'The only decision you have to make is who you want sitting in that seat in the White House when - NOT IF - but 'when' we get hit again and millions of American lives are put at risk! You ain't gonna like losing.'
President Bush did make a bad mistake in the war on terrorism. But the mistake was not his decision to go to war in Iraq. Bush's mistake came in his belief that this country is the same one his father fought for in WWII. It is not.
Back then we had just come out of a vicious depression. The country was steeled by the hardship of that depression but they still believed fervently in this country. They knew that the people had elected their leaders so it was the people's duty to back those leaders.
Therefore when the war broke out the people came together, rallied behind and stuck w ith their leaders whether they had voted for them or not or whether the war was going badly or not.
And war was just as distasteful and the anguish just as great then as it is today. Often there were more casualties in one day in WWII than we have had in the entire Iraq war. But that did not matter. The people stuck with the President because it was their patriotic duty. Americans put aside their differences in WWII and worked together to win that war.
Everyone from every strata of society from young to old pitched in. Small children pulled little wagons around to gather scrap metal for the war effort. Grade school students saved their pennies to buy stamps for war bonds to help the effort. (Yes, we actually did these things 'back then')...........
Men who were too old or medically 4F lied about their age or condition trying their best to join the military. Women doubled their work to keep things going at home. Harsh rationing of everything from gasoline to soap to butter was imposed yet there was very little complaining. You never heard prominent people on the radio belittling the President. Interestingly enough in those days there were no fat cat actors and entertainers who ran off to visit and fawn over dictators of hostile countries and complain to them about our President. Instead they made upbeat films and entertained our troops to help the troops' morale. And a bunch even enlisted.
And imagine this: Teachers in schools actually started the day off with a Pledge of Allegiance and with prayers for our country and our troops! Back then no newspaper would have dared point out certain weak spots in our cities where bombs could be set off to cause the maximum damage. No newspaper would have dared complain about what we were doing to catch spies.
A newspaper would have been laughed out of existence if it had complained that German or Japanese soldiers were being 'tortured' by being forced to wear women's underwear or subjected to interrogation by a woman or being scared by a dog or did not have air conditioning.
There were a lot of things different back then We were not subjected to a constant bombardment of pornography, perversion, and promiscuity in movies or on radio. We did not have legions of crack heads, dope pushers, and armed gangs roaming our streets.
No, President Bush did not make a mistake in his handling of terrorism. He made the mistake of believing that we still had the courage and fortitude of our fathers. He believed that this was still the country that our fathers fought so dearly to preserve. It is not the same country. It is now a cross between Sodom and Gomorrah and the land of Oz. We did unite for a short while after 9/11, but our attitude changed when we found out that defending our country would require some sacrifices.
We are in great danger. The terrorists are fanatic Muslims. They believe that it is okay, even their duty to kill anyone who will not convert to Islam. It has been estimated that about one third or over three hundred million Muslims are sympathetic to the terrorists' cause... Hitler and Tojo combined did not have nearly that many potential recruits.
So... We either win it - or lose it - and you ain't gonna like losing.
America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall.
Take a couple of minutes to read this. Then I ask that you THINK ABOUT IT when you vote in November. Voting Democrat or Republican is most definitely YOUR CHOICE. Just remember what you have just read.
Send this to everyone you know, if you've got the guts to do it!!!
However, millions of the younger generations will not even know what this is all about.......all we can do is try to inform.....try to help in any way we can!
Whoopi’s Ignorant and Offensive Slave Remark
"Should I be worried about being a slave, about being returned to slavery because certain things happened in the Constitution that you had to change?"—Whoopi Goldberg, the View
They’re doing it again. I remember being in line in 2000 at an event and two African American’s were in line before me and they were talking about the 2000 Presidential elections between Vice President Al Gore and Gov. George W. Bush.
What I heard was a startling display of reverse racism. One said to the other that they would never vote for George Bush because if Bush were elected he is going to re-institute slavery.
Of all of the most outlandish of claims why must it always revert to this? Need I remind everyone the Republican Party is the Party of Lincoln?(See story)
Everyone knows this, but it's worth repeating: The Republican Party is the party of Abraham Lincoln and was established in 1854 to block the expansion of slavery.One of my friends, he’s black, makes it known emphatically that he is voting for Sen. Barack Obama because he is a Black man.
The Democratic Party was the party of slavery: Its two founders, Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson, owned large numbers of slaves, and every party platform before the Civil War defended the institution unequivocally.
After the war, it was the Republican Party that rammed through the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution over Democratic opposition.
Republicans also enacted a series of civil-rights laws that culminated in the Civil Rights Act of 1875, which basically did what the Civil Rights Act of 1964 accomplished … Historically speaking, the Republican Party has a far better record on race than the Democrats. Sen. McCain should not be shy about saying so.--Bruce Bartlett
This reverse racism that Whoopi and people who think like her are displaying is not only ignorant but it is as ugly if not uglier than its progenitor.
Racism has been heretofore say to have come from ignorance but this neo reverse racism is a willing self delusion that some Black have believing somehow that Whites have the power or the desire to put Black people back in chains.
Affirmative Action’s original intent was to allow opportunities that qualified Blacks where not receiving because of racism. Lately Affirmative Action has been identified with placing unqualified minorities into positions that they do not warrant.
It is ashamed that Black people are backing an unqualified Black man for the most important office in this country. Barack Obama is not qualified to be the President of the United States thus fulfilling all of the stereotypes about Blacks and Affirmative Action that have currently developed about Affirmative Action and Black people.
Whoopi it is the welfare state, which Liberals promote, that is what has destroyed Black families by creating the slavery of dependency on the State. Those are exactly the policies that Barack Obama and the Democrat Party are campaigning to enact if he should be elected President.
Whoopi should be reminded that Blacks owned slaves too! So your Massa, Whoopi, could be the candidate that you’re voting for Barack Obama not John McCain!
Monday, September 15, 2008
THE BUSH DOCTRINE
Got cha’ ! This moose huntin’ babe from Alaska doesn’t know anything about foreign policy.
That was the impression that the elitist reporter Charles Gibson of ABC news attempted to convey to the American people with his surprise pop quiz amid his interview with Vice President Candidate Gov. Sarah Palin only thing is according to the journalist that coined the phase the Bush Doctrine, Charles Krauthammer, Gibson failed his own test. (see story)
Gibson didn’t know what the Bush doctrine was and his condescending definition of the so called Bush Doctrine was simply wrong! (related story)
The fact is this question was simply newspeak the term Bush Doctrine was made up by a journalist and apparently the definition changed over time so Gibson’s question to Palin really was, “Governor do you keep up with the media’s pronouncements and definitions?”
Obviously Gibson doesn’t keep up with those pronouncements and definitions himself yet he attempted to be the journalist that single-handedly took Sarah Palin down and who sparked the Obama campaign to victory by derailing the McCain campaign, but what’s happening instead is Gibson is having his own Dan Rather moment.
CBS news’ Dan Rather attempted to affect the 2004 elections by reporting unvetted stories meant to disparage President Bush but because Rather’s information was proven forged subsequently Rather was disgraced and lost this job.
Tactics like these have put the major networks CBS, ABC and NBC under a cloud of suspicion along with their cable counterparts MSNBC and CNN. Gibson’s got’cha does more damage to image of the major networks!
Why would they attempt such a stunt? Right now the media is mad that Sen. McCain is ahead in the polls. (see story)
No one should be surprised that the media is attempting to affect the outcome of this election after what they did in 2000 and 2004.
It’s just nice to know that Gibson and his allies will make so evident, what they are doing, from time to time. So evident that only the most rabid of partisans can’t see it.
I’ve got a definition Charlie, Media attempting to affect the outcome of an election I think I’ll call that the Dan Rather Doctrine!
Mr. Gibson do you know what the “Dan Rather Doctrine” is? Hum?
Sunday, September 14, 2008
You Knew This was Coming....Right?
The Obama campaign and the liberal left had sent
all those investigators and lawyers up to Alaska,
with the sole purpose of digging up dirt on Sarah
Palin. Well, it seems that they are getting some
help from the resident politicians there. I guess
they see it as payback, for Sarah’s 81% approval
rating among voters, and are doing their best to kill her
VP candidacy.
When you are a tough governor, you make enemies.
We all know that and the Democratic politicians are
going to do their best to work for Obama in this investigation.
Especially since those on the investigating committee
are Democrats. Am I the only one, or does anybody
else see this as a 100% set-up?
Add to these flunkies, the Republicans whose toes
she has stepped on by refusing earmarks, cutting graft
and corruption and you’ve got a pretty “air-tight” case
against her.
Now,.......... probably because he adds so much to this
family, as the “perfect” husband and father, they are
planning to subpoena Todd Palin for the investigation.
Maybe they plan on issuing subpoenas for the children
including the baby with Down's Syndrome.
Desperate times produce desperate measures.......... and
after the way the left has attacked Sarah Palin, it doesn’t
surprise me in the least that this “investigation” comes on
the heels of the major trouncing that she is giving to the
Obama campaign.
Hang in there Sarah.............. you’ve got the support of
the fair-minded people in this country. They did warn you
that you were going to be attacked in any way the Democrats
could get to you. It didn’t work when they attacked you, so
they went for your children. When that didn’t work, they
decided to dig up some dirt, blow it all out of proportion with
the help of the liberal media, and bring it all out into the
open before election day. You got my vote, no matter what
they claim or how they manipulate the findings.
all those investigators and lawyers up to Alaska,
with the sole purpose of digging up dirt on Sarah
Palin. Well, it seems that they are getting some
help from the resident politicians there. I guess
they see it as payback, for Sarah’s 81% approval
rating among voters, and are doing their best to kill her
VP candidacy.
When you are a tough governor, you make enemies.
We all know that and the Democratic politicians are
going to do their best to work for Obama in this investigation.
Especially since those on the investigating committee
are Democrats. Am I the only one, or does anybody
else see this as a 100% set-up?
Add to these flunkies, the Republicans whose toes
she has stepped on by refusing earmarks, cutting graft
and corruption and you’ve got a pretty “air-tight” case
against her.
Now,.......... probably because he adds so much to this
family, as the “perfect” husband and father, they are
planning to subpoena Todd Palin for the investigation.
Maybe they plan on issuing subpoenas for the children
including the baby with Down's Syndrome.
Desperate times produce desperate measures.......... and
after the way the left has attacked Sarah Palin, it doesn’t
surprise me in the least that this “investigation” comes on
the heels of the major trouncing that she is giving to the
Obama campaign.
Hang in there Sarah.............. you’ve got the support of
the fair-minded people in this country. They did warn you
that you were going to be attacked in any way the Democrats
could get to you. It didn’t work when they attacked you, so
they went for your children. When that didn’t work, they
decided to dig up some dirt, blow it all out of proportion with
the help of the liberal media, and bring it all out into the
open before election day. You got my vote, no matter what
they claim or how they manipulate the findings.
The Pot, Calling the Kettle..............
Sorry, I can’t say that word.......... I might be accused
of not being “politically correct”.
I quote from the Associated Press...........
WASHINGTON - The question of whether Sarah Palin has ever been to Iraq pushed Obama aides Saturday to accuse the McCain campaign of outright lies, distortions and distractions to the American people.
Since Republican presidential nominee John McCain tapped the Alaska governor to be his running mate on Aug. 29, questions about her experience have been fueled by her relatively brief tenure in office, as well as a dearth of foreign travel.
Palin made a well-documented trip to Kuwait and Germany last year to visit U.S. troops, and over time, the governor and her staff have revealed she also visited Canada and Mexico. Meanwhile, her aides clarified that a purported visit to Ireland was little more than a refueling stop during her trip to the Middle East.
So now, the Obama campaign is splitting hairs over the “honesty” of the information originally released by the McCain campaign, concerning Sarah Palin’s trips.
In his continuing effort to derail this dynamo to the White House, Obama is questioning her honesty.........hmmmmmmmmmm.
Let’s see now......................
OBAMA'S "NOT EXACTLY'S"
1.) Selma Got Me Born - NOT EXACTLY, your parents felt safe enough to have you in 1961 - Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in 1965. (Google' Obama Selma ' for his full March 4, 2007 speech and articles about its various untruths.)>
2.) Father Was A Goat Herder - NOT EXACTLY, he was a privileged, well educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government.
3.) Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter - NOT EXACTLY, he was part of one of the most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever had.
4.) My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom - NOT EXACTLY, your cousin Raila Odinga has created mass violence in attempting to overturn a legitimate election in 2007, in Kenya It is the first widespread violence in decades. The current government is pro-American but Odinga wants to overthrow it and establish Muslim Sharia law. Your half-brother, Abongo Obama, is Odinga's follower. You interrupted your New Hampshire campaigning to speak to Odinga on the phone.
Obama's cousin Odinga in Kenya ran for president and tried to get Sharia muslim law in place there. When Odinga lost the elections, his followers have burned Christians' homes and then burned men, women and children alive in a Christian church where they took shelter.. Obama SUPPORTED his cousin before the election process here started. Google Obama and Odinga and see what you get. No one wants to know the truth.
5.) My Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian - NOT EXACTLY, she does her daily Salat prayers at 5 AM according to her own interviews. Not to mention, Christianity wouldn't allow her to have been one of 14 wives to 1 man.
6.) My Name is African Swahili - NOT EXACTLY, your name is Arabic and 'Baraka' (from which Barack came) means 'blessed' in that language. Hussein is also Arabic and so is Obama.
Barack Hussein Obama is not half black. If elected, he would be the first Arab-American President, not the first black President. Barack Hussein Obama is 50% Caucasian from his mother's side and 43.75% Arabic and 6.25% African Negro from his father's side. While Barack Hussein Obama's father was from Kenya , his father's family was mainly Arabs.. Barack Hussein Obama's father was only 12..5% African Negro and 87.5% Arab (his father's birth certificate even states he's Arab, not African Negro). From....and for more....go to.....
http://www..arcadeathome.com/newsboy.phtml?Barack_Hussein_Obama_-_Arab-American,_only_6..25%_African
7.) I Never Practiced Islam - NOT EXACTLY, you practiced it daily at school, where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that faith for 31 years, until your wife made you change, so you could run for office. 4-3-08 Article "Obama was 'quite religious in islam'" http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=60559
8.) My School In Indonesia was Christian - NOT EXACTLY, you were registered as Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies for making faces (check your own book).
February 28, 2008. Kristoff from the New York Times a year ago: Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it'll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset." This is just one example of what Pamela is talking about when she says "Obama's narrative is being altered, enhanced and manipulated to whitewash troubling facts."
9.) I Was Fluent In Indonesian - NOT EXACTLY, not one teacher says you could speak the language.
10.) Because I Lived In Indonesia , I Have More Foreign Experience - NOT EXACTLY, you were there from the ages of 6 to 10, and couldn't even speak the language. What did you learn, how to study the Koran and watch cartoons.
11.) I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs - NOT EXACTLY, except for Africa (surprise) and the Middle East (bigger surprise), you have never been anywhere else on the planet and thus have NO experience with our closest allies.
12.) I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion - NOT EXACTLY, you were quite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no mention of Kenya and no mention of struggle to identify - your classmates said you were just fine.
13.) An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office - NOT EXACTLY, Ebony has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist.
14.) A Life Magazine Article Changed My outlook on Life - NOT EXACTLY, Life has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist.
15.) I Won't Run On A National Ticket In '08 - NOT EXACTLY, here you are, despite saying, live on TV,
> that you would not have enough experience by then, and you are all about having experience first.>
16.) Voting "Present" is Common In Illinois Senate - NOT EXACTLY, they are common for YOU, but not many others have 130 NO-VOTES.
17.) Oops, I Mis-voted - NOT EXACTLY, only when caught by church groups and Democrats, did you beg to change your mis-vote.
18.) I Was A Professor Of Law - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.
19.) I Was A Constitutional Lawyer - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.
20.) Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill - NOT EXACTLY, you didn't write it, introduce it, change it, or create it.
21.) The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass - NOT EXACTLY, it took just 14 days from start to finish.
22.) I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill - NOT EXACTLY, your bill was rejected by your own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation - mainly because of your Nuclear donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came.
23.) I Have Released My State Records - NOT EXACTLY, as of March, 2008, state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be released, exposing all the special interests pork hidden within.
24.) I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess - NOT EXACTLY, you were part of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld Gardens . You failed to mention anyone else but yourself, in your books. >
25.) My Economics Bill Will Help America - NOT EXACTLY, your 111 economic policies were just combined into a proposal which lost 99-0, and even YOU voted against your own bill. >
26.) I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois - NOT EXACTLY, even your own supporters claim to have not seen BOLD action on your part.
27.) I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year - NOT EXACTLY, they were not YOUR bills, but rather handed to you, after their creation by a fellow Senator, to assist you in a future bid for higher office.
28.) No One on my campaign contacted Canada about NAFTA - NOT EXACTLY, the Candian Government issued the names and a memo of the conversation your campaign had with them.
29.) I Am Tough On Terrorism - NOT EXACTLY, you missed the Iran Resolution vote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah supports the destruction of Israel .
30.) I Want All Votes To Count - NOT EXACTLY, you said let the delegates decide.
31.) I Want Americans To Decide - NOT EXACTLY, you prefer caucuses that limit the vote, confuse the voters, force a public vote, and only operate during small windows of time.
32.) I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate - NOT EXACTLY, you passed 26, most of which you didn't write yourself.
33.) I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics - NOT EXACTLY, you used tactics to eliminate Alice Palmer from running against you.
34.) I Don't Take PAC Money - NOT EXACTLY, you take loads of it.
35.) I don't Have Lobbyists - NOT EXACTLY, you have over 47 lobbyists, and counting.
36.) My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad - NOT EXACTLY, your own campaign worker made the ad on his Apple in one afternoon.
37.) I Have Always Been Against Iraq - NOT EXACTLY, you weren't in office to vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time.
38.) I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care - NOT EXACTLY, your plan leaves us all to pay for the 15,000,000 who don't have to buy it
God help us if we just sit idly by and let this person become our next president. It would be suicidal for us to do nothing to prevent this from happening. Copy and paste this and send it to everyone that you know. It's time that the "Silent Majority" takes a stand. Please get out to vote on Election Day, if you care about our country.
of not being “politically correct”.
I quote from the Associated Press...........
WASHINGTON - The question of whether Sarah Palin has ever been to Iraq pushed Obama aides Saturday to accuse the McCain campaign of outright lies, distortions and distractions to the American people.
Since Republican presidential nominee John McCain tapped the Alaska governor to be his running mate on Aug. 29, questions about her experience have been fueled by her relatively brief tenure in office, as well as a dearth of foreign travel.
Palin made a well-documented trip to Kuwait and Germany last year to visit U.S. troops, and over time, the governor and her staff have revealed she also visited Canada and Mexico. Meanwhile, her aides clarified that a purported visit to Ireland was little more than a refueling stop during her trip to the Middle East.
So now, the Obama campaign is splitting hairs over the “honesty” of the information originally released by the McCain campaign, concerning Sarah Palin’s trips.
In his continuing effort to derail this dynamo to the White House, Obama is questioning her honesty.........hmmmmmmmmmm.
Let’s see now......................
OBAMA'S "NOT EXACTLY'S"
1.) Selma Got Me Born - NOT EXACTLY, your parents felt safe enough to have you in 1961 - Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in 1965. (Google' Obama Selma ' for his full March 4, 2007 speech and articles about its various untruths.)>
2.) Father Was A Goat Herder - NOT EXACTLY, he was a privileged, well educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government.
3.) Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter - NOT EXACTLY, he was part of one of the most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever had.
4.) My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom - NOT EXACTLY, your cousin Raila Odinga has created mass violence in attempting to overturn a legitimate election in 2007, in Kenya It is the first widespread violence in decades. The current government is pro-American but Odinga wants to overthrow it and establish Muslim Sharia law. Your half-brother, Abongo Obama, is Odinga's follower. You interrupted your New Hampshire campaigning to speak to Odinga on the phone.
Obama's cousin Odinga in Kenya ran for president and tried to get Sharia muslim law in place there. When Odinga lost the elections, his followers have burned Christians' homes and then burned men, women and children alive in a Christian church where they took shelter.. Obama SUPPORTED his cousin before the election process here started. Google Obama and Odinga and see what you get. No one wants to know the truth.
5.) My Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian - NOT EXACTLY, she does her daily Salat prayers at 5 AM according to her own interviews. Not to mention, Christianity wouldn't allow her to have been one of 14 wives to 1 man.
6.) My Name is African Swahili - NOT EXACTLY, your name is Arabic and 'Baraka' (from which Barack came) means 'blessed' in that language. Hussein is also Arabic and so is Obama.
Barack Hussein Obama is not half black. If elected, he would be the first Arab-American President, not the first black President. Barack Hussein Obama is 50% Caucasian from his mother's side and 43.75% Arabic and 6.25% African Negro from his father's side. While Barack Hussein Obama's father was from Kenya , his father's family was mainly Arabs.. Barack Hussein Obama's father was only 12..5% African Negro and 87.5% Arab (his father's birth certificate even states he's Arab, not African Negro). From....and for more....go to.....
http://www..arcadeathome.com/newsboy.phtml?Barack_Hussein_Obama_-_Arab-American,_only_6..25%_African
7.) I Never Practiced Islam - NOT EXACTLY, you practiced it daily at school, where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that faith for 31 years, until your wife made you change, so you could run for office. 4-3-08 Article "Obama was 'quite religious in islam'" http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=60559
8.) My School In Indonesia was Christian - NOT EXACTLY, you were registered as Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies for making faces (check your own book).
February 28, 2008. Kristoff from the New York Times a year ago: Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it'll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset." This is just one example of what Pamela is talking about when she says "Obama's narrative is being altered, enhanced and manipulated to whitewash troubling facts."
9.) I Was Fluent In Indonesian - NOT EXACTLY, not one teacher says you could speak the language.
10.) Because I Lived In Indonesia , I Have More Foreign Experience - NOT EXACTLY, you were there from the ages of 6 to 10, and couldn't even speak the language. What did you learn, how to study the Koran and watch cartoons.
11.) I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs - NOT EXACTLY, except for Africa (surprise) and the Middle East (bigger surprise), you have never been anywhere else on the planet and thus have NO experience with our closest allies.
12.) I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion - NOT EXACTLY, you were quite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no mention of Kenya and no mention of struggle to identify - your classmates said you were just fine.
13.) An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office - NOT EXACTLY, Ebony has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist.
14.) A Life Magazine Article Changed My outlook on Life - NOT EXACTLY, Life has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist.
15.) I Won't Run On A National Ticket In '08 - NOT EXACTLY, here you are, despite saying, live on TV,
> that you would not have enough experience by then, and you are all about having experience first.>
16.) Voting "Present" is Common In Illinois Senate - NOT EXACTLY, they are common for YOU, but not many others have 130 NO-VOTES.
17.) Oops, I Mis-voted - NOT EXACTLY, only when caught by church groups and Democrats, did you beg to change your mis-vote.
18.) I Was A Professor Of Law - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.
19.) I Was A Constitutional Lawyer - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.
20.) Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill - NOT EXACTLY, you didn't write it, introduce it, change it, or create it.
21.) The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass - NOT EXACTLY, it took just 14 days from start to finish.
22.) I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill - NOT EXACTLY, your bill was rejected by your own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation - mainly because of your Nuclear donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came.
23.) I Have Released My State Records - NOT EXACTLY, as of March, 2008, state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be released, exposing all the special interests pork hidden within.
24.) I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess - NOT EXACTLY, you were part of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld Gardens . You failed to mention anyone else but yourself, in your books. >
25.) My Economics Bill Will Help America - NOT EXACTLY, your 111 economic policies were just combined into a proposal which lost 99-0, and even YOU voted against your own bill. >
26.) I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois - NOT EXACTLY, even your own supporters claim to have not seen BOLD action on your part.
27.) I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year - NOT EXACTLY, they were not YOUR bills, but rather handed to you, after their creation by a fellow Senator, to assist you in a future bid for higher office.
28.) No One on my campaign contacted Canada about NAFTA - NOT EXACTLY, the Candian Government issued the names and a memo of the conversation your campaign had with them.
29.) I Am Tough On Terrorism - NOT EXACTLY, you missed the Iran Resolution vote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah supports the destruction of Israel .
30.) I Want All Votes To Count - NOT EXACTLY, you said let the delegates decide.
31.) I Want Americans To Decide - NOT EXACTLY, you prefer caucuses that limit the vote, confuse the voters, force a public vote, and only operate during small windows of time.
32.) I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate - NOT EXACTLY, you passed 26, most of which you didn't write yourself.
33.) I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics - NOT EXACTLY, you used tactics to eliminate Alice Palmer from running against you.
34.) I Don't Take PAC Money - NOT EXACTLY, you take loads of it.
35.) I don't Have Lobbyists - NOT EXACTLY, you have over 47 lobbyists, and counting.
36.) My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad - NOT EXACTLY, your own campaign worker made the ad on his Apple in one afternoon.
37.) I Have Always Been Against Iraq - NOT EXACTLY, you weren't in office to vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time.
38.) I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care - NOT EXACTLY, your plan leaves us all to pay for the 15,000,000 who don't have to buy it
God help us if we just sit idly by and let this person become our next president. It would be suicidal for us to do nothing to prevent this from happening. Copy and paste this and send it to everyone that you know. It's time that the "Silent Majority" takes a stand. Please get out to vote on Election Day, if you care about our country.
Saturday, September 13, 2008
The “Ladies” of the View
What a misnomer............ !
To anyone who saw the hatchet job that those rejects
from real life tried to do, remember what I write here.
Joy, who was her usual “lovely” self, was bed enough,
but I was totally surprised by the way that Barbara
Walters attacked McCain, without even giving him a
chance to respond. She pressed and pressed, in an
obvious attempt to rattle him into possibly saying
that could be misconstrued later.
I, along with thousands of others, took note that at no
time did she look McCain in the face, but rather had her
eyes riveted on the monitor that was facing her. That
made it obvious that this entire “interview” was a left-
wing set-up, in order to make him look as bad as possible
to the viewing audience.
Her unwarranted attacks on Sarah Palin were also quite
vehement and irritating. At no point, did she allow
John McCain a moment to gather two thoughts together,
and I guess that was her intention. Barbara, you gave
away your liberal position within the first three minutes
of the interview.
To pretend to host an “interview” and then have the
audacity to spring onto the attack without warning is both
despicable and typical of the left. Had it not been for
Cindy McCain putting Walters in her place, with a lot more
class than Barbara could ever have, the interview might
have been a total disaster. Manufactured, of course.
My analysis of that fiasco is that the ones to get hurt the
most are the “Witches of Viewick” and not Senator John
McCain nor Governor Sarah Palin. Any viewers with
intelligence could see right through this oh so obvious
plan, whether hatched by Barbara Walters or ABC.
And speaking of ABC, Charles Gibson tried real hard to
throw a few curve balls at Sarah Palin during her interview.
I think that she hit them right back at him. Particularly
the ones concerning the non-existent “Bush Doctrine”
To anyone who saw the hatchet job that those rejects
from real life tried to do, remember what I write here.
Joy, who was her usual “lovely” self, was bed enough,
but I was totally surprised by the way that Barbara
Walters attacked McCain, without even giving him a
chance to respond. She pressed and pressed, in an
obvious attempt to rattle him into possibly saying
that could be misconstrued later.
I, along with thousands of others, took note that at no
time did she look McCain in the face, but rather had her
eyes riveted on the monitor that was facing her. That
made it obvious that this entire “interview” was a left-
wing set-up, in order to make him look as bad as possible
to the viewing audience.
Her unwarranted attacks on Sarah Palin were also quite
vehement and irritating. At no point, did she allow
John McCain a moment to gather two thoughts together,
and I guess that was her intention. Barbara, you gave
away your liberal position within the first three minutes
of the interview.
To pretend to host an “interview” and then have the
audacity to spring onto the attack without warning is both
despicable and typical of the left. Had it not been for
Cindy McCain putting Walters in her place, with a lot more
class than Barbara could ever have, the interview might
have been a total disaster. Manufactured, of course.
My analysis of that fiasco is that the ones to get hurt the
most are the “Witches of Viewick” and not Senator John
McCain nor Governor Sarah Palin. Any viewers with
intelligence could see right through this oh so obvious
plan, whether hatched by Barbara Walters or ABC.
And speaking of ABC, Charles Gibson tried real hard to
throw a few curve balls at Sarah Palin during her interview.
I think that she hit them right back at him. Particularly
the ones concerning the non-existent “Bush Doctrine”
Democrats Deceptive on Drilling!!!!!
The Dems are doing everything they can to shift
the blame for their no-action Congress onto the
Bush administration and the Republicans in general.
Now they are accusing the Republicans of not being
cooperative in speedily passing their “new” energy
bill. They have taken the original intention of the
bill and added all kinds of earmarks and windfall
programs to it. Why can’t we just have the “drill
here, drill now” legislation that the voters want?
All they really have to do is lift the Federal ban
on offshore drilling.
Their thinly disguised "new" plan to allow offshore drilling
is merely a rehash of their previous crap. They keep
saying “let the oil companies drill in the areas in which
they already hold leases”................... hello!!!!.... every
time they try, the liberal Democratic-backed “green
groups” file suits through their closest ally, the ACLU.
The “Gorites” got a stronger grip on the Congress, since
the “inventor of the internet” managed to pull off the
biggest coup in history, by getting the Nobel Peace Prize
for something that he really knows nothing about. This
“green hysteria” ignited the volcano, that just might
blow the Dems right back where they were four years
ago.
Face it!!! Our (well, maybe yours, because I didn’t vote
for any of these phonies) elected Democratic Congressmen and
women, headed up by “Captain” Harry Reid and “First Mate”
Nancy Pelosi, couldn’t care less about you and me. For them,
it’s still all about “me”, power, and the ship of state, and let the
public be damned. For all their pre-election hype, they are just
yesterdays warmed-over milk-toast.
I hope that the sheep who in ‘06, followed the advice of the labor
unions, Wall Street, and the Environmentalists, with the
help of the MSM, will finally admit that they made an
enormous mistake in 2006, and fix the congress. This time,
not with partisan “revenge-seekers”, but with honest, caring
public servants, who truly represent the will of the people.
Change is coming, and let’s hope it's in the public's best interest!
the blame for their no-action Congress onto the
Bush administration and the Republicans in general.
Now they are accusing the Republicans of not being
cooperative in speedily passing their “new” energy
bill. They have taken the original intention of the
bill and added all kinds of earmarks and windfall
programs to it. Why can’t we just have the “drill
here, drill now” legislation that the voters want?
All they really have to do is lift the Federal ban
on offshore drilling.
Their thinly disguised "new" plan to allow offshore drilling
is merely a rehash of their previous crap. They keep
saying “let the oil companies drill in the areas in which
they already hold leases”................... hello!!!!.... every
time they try, the liberal Democratic-backed “green
groups” file suits through their closest ally, the ACLU.
The “Gorites” got a stronger grip on the Congress, since
the “inventor of the internet” managed to pull off the
biggest coup in history, by getting the Nobel Peace Prize
for something that he really knows nothing about. This
“green hysteria” ignited the volcano, that just might
blow the Dems right back where they were four years
ago.
Face it!!! Our (well, maybe yours, because I didn’t vote
for any of these phonies) elected Democratic Congressmen and
women, headed up by “Captain” Harry Reid and “First Mate”
Nancy Pelosi, couldn’t care less about you and me. For them,
it’s still all about “me”, power, and the ship of state, and let the
public be damned. For all their pre-election hype, they are just
yesterdays warmed-over milk-toast.
I hope that the sheep who in ‘06, followed the advice of the labor
unions, Wall Street, and the Environmentalists, with the
help of the MSM, will finally admit that they made an
enormous mistake in 2006, and fix the congress. This time,
not with partisan “revenge-seekers”, but with honest, caring
public servants, who truly represent the will of the people.
Change is coming, and let’s hope it's in the public's best interest!
Friday, September 12, 2008
Would Jesus Organize for ACORN
ACORN or the “Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now” is a radical 60’s style “In Your Face” group that Barack Obama proudly claims association with. Though Sen. Obama worked with other groups primarily it is this group that Obama cut his “community organizer” chops with.
Investigative reporter Stanley Kurtz in his, “Inside Obama’s ACORN” shows us a better picture of what Sen. Obama did as a community organizer as he also helps us to understand the workings of the political action group, ACORN. (see article)
What is interesting to me is that several Democrats have made the claim that Jesus was a community Organizer in answer to Republican Vice President hopeful Sarah Palin’s remark that Democrat look down on her experience as a small town mayor so she equated her experience to that of a community organizer only her job had responsibilities.
This remark drew the ire of Obama supporters who like Congressman Steve Cohen wants to make it plain that organizing for the community should in no wise be looked down upon because Jesus the Christ himself was a community organizer. Cohen makes this observation on the floor of Congress: (see video)
In his article Mr. Kurtz lays out that Sen. Obama was a trainer of ACORN leadership as well Obama trained members in techniques of direct political action, which is protesting and storming meetings. Yet a recent look at the organization shows some startling lack of organization and ethics. (see video)
ACORN seems to be less than discriminatory in their hiring practices too. (see video)
And once hired ACORN doesn’t seem to want to pay workers wages which is ironic because one of ACORN’s main political action items is to fight for higher worker’s wages. (see video)
Instead of the small army of reporters, lawyers and investigators that have descended on the small Alaskan town of Wasilla to attempt to find something to damage Gov. Sarah Palin if there is a real story, and there is, that story is how the political Jesus, Barack Hussein Obama has turned the political water of community organizing for ACORN into the political wine of running to be President of the United States of America.
Some unbelieving skeptics should look into this miracle.
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Hmmmmmmmmmm!
I just finished watching the “9/11 Presidential Forum”.
Several things struck me. Senator Obama echoed much of
what Senator McCaine said, almost to the letter, with the
exception that Obama got much more applause, even when
the audience was not supposed to do that. And the reason
for that?............... the forum was held at Columbia
University, Senator Obama’s Alma Mater.
I applaud Senator McCain for mentioning that Columbia
should have an ROTC presence on campus. During his time
slot, Senator Obama agreed with John McCain, probably much
to the chagrin of the president of Columbia. Both candidates
want to see more volunteer cooperation, but McCain wants it
to be primarily voluntary, with no remuneration whatsoever,
while Obama seems to tie all his suggestions up with additional
benefits for the volunteers.............meaning more government
supervision or cooperation and probably remuneration. One
way or the other, Obama’s plans will involve bigger government
and more federal expenditures. So where is the "volunteerism"?
I was fascinated by how Obama twisted the “community organizer”
flap around, to make it seem as though he was attacked by the
Republicans. He seems to forget that it was his campaign that
initiated the exchange, by accusing Sarah Palin of being unqualified, based on the fact that she had been a small-town mayor. Two things that they totally failed to mention were that Sarah Palin was mayor for a ten year period, before moving on to Governor of Alaska, which Obama’s campaign always seems to ignore.
Obama's "community organizer" accomplishments pale in comparison. w
On a one-on-one basis, there is no way that Obama’s two years
as a junior senator can hold a candle to even the small-town mayor
standing of McCain’s choice of VP candidate. Add to that the
prestige and experience of her Governorship, and the undeniable
fact that Obama has been campaigning for half of his tenure in the
senate. Just more cheap shot by Obama...........even at such a forum.
Aside from that, both the candidates more or less agreed on quite
a few points. But.................did anyone notice that Obama quoted McCain word for word, as though this were his original statement? At the end of his segment, he stated that, “change happens from the bottom up, not from the top down”............wow, how original!
McCain has been saying that for weeks!
Several things struck me. Senator Obama echoed much of
what Senator McCaine said, almost to the letter, with the
exception that Obama got much more applause, even when
the audience was not supposed to do that. And the reason
for that?............... the forum was held at Columbia
University, Senator Obama’s Alma Mater.
I applaud Senator McCain for mentioning that Columbia
should have an ROTC presence on campus. During his time
slot, Senator Obama agreed with John McCain, probably much
to the chagrin of the president of Columbia. Both candidates
want to see more volunteer cooperation, but McCain wants it
to be primarily voluntary, with no remuneration whatsoever,
while Obama seems to tie all his suggestions up with additional
benefits for the volunteers.............meaning more government
supervision or cooperation and probably remuneration. One
way or the other, Obama’s plans will involve bigger government
and more federal expenditures. So where is the "volunteerism"?
I was fascinated by how Obama twisted the “community organizer”
flap around, to make it seem as though he was attacked by the
Republicans. He seems to forget that it was his campaign that
initiated the exchange, by accusing Sarah Palin of being unqualified, based on the fact that she had been a small-town mayor. Two things that they totally failed to mention were that Sarah Palin was mayor for a ten year period, before moving on to Governor of Alaska, which Obama’s campaign always seems to ignore.
Obama's "community organizer" accomplishments pale in comparison. w
On a one-on-one basis, there is no way that Obama’s two years
as a junior senator can hold a candle to even the small-town mayor
standing of McCain’s choice of VP candidate. Add to that the
prestige and experience of her Governorship, and the undeniable
fact that Obama has been campaigning for half of his tenure in the
senate. Just more cheap shot by Obama...........even at such a forum.
Aside from that, both the candidates more or less agreed on quite
a few points. But.................did anyone notice that Obama quoted McCain word for word, as though this were his original statement? At the end of his segment, he stated that, “change happens from the bottom up, not from the top down”............wow, how original!
McCain has been saying that for weeks!
Another Example of Dem Hypocrisy!
One of the Obama campaign’s chief talking points is
the "high rate of unemployment" that we presently have.
But yet, they still aim to compound the problem.
This is how the Democrats have been able to “increase
their voter registration”, by filling the country with aliens,
legal and not. And at the same time taking a swipe at the
Bush administration for having lost American jobs.
Not to mention (ahem!) that the unemployment rate during the
Clinton years was higher.
The U.S. House Judiciary Committee desperately wants
to give away 550,000 American jobs! If it were to pass, H.R. 5882 would bring in 550,000 permanent greencard holders, above the 1 million immigrants already planned! With U.S. unemployment shooting up to a five-year high, this is the very worst time to add more competition to Americans.
But Nancy Pelosi and her allies backed down yesterday before they could get the immigration increase past the Judiciary Committee. They thought it would be easy. Instead, they ran into a buzzsaw.
Thanks to caring groups such as “Numbers USA”, (check it out), the
Congress has been flooded with phone calls and faxes,
virtually killing the “Democratic give-a-way of American
jobs”.
And then the Obama campaign has the gall to accuse the
Bush administration of causing Americans to lose jobs overseas?
This is political BS, and the voters should be made to know
just who is causing this and why this is happening.
I can assure everyone that if Obama is elected, we can all kiss
our jobs goodbye. Or maybe we should all just move to Mexico,
since there will no longer be anybody there!
the "high rate of unemployment" that we presently have.
But yet, they still aim to compound the problem.
This is how the Democrats have been able to “increase
their voter registration”, by filling the country with aliens,
legal and not. And at the same time taking a swipe at the
Bush administration for having lost American jobs.
Not to mention (ahem!) that the unemployment rate during the
Clinton years was higher.
The U.S. House Judiciary Committee desperately wants
to give away 550,000 American jobs! If it were to pass, H.R. 5882 would bring in 550,000 permanent greencard holders, above the 1 million immigrants already planned! With U.S. unemployment shooting up to a five-year high, this is the very worst time to add more competition to Americans.
But Nancy Pelosi and her allies backed down yesterday before they could get the immigration increase past the Judiciary Committee. They thought it would be easy. Instead, they ran into a buzzsaw.
Thanks to caring groups such as “Numbers USA”, (check it out), the
Congress has been flooded with phone calls and faxes,
virtually killing the “Democratic give-a-way of American
jobs”.
And then the Obama campaign has the gall to accuse the
Bush administration of causing Americans to lose jobs overseas?
This is political BS, and the voters should be made to know
just who is causing this and why this is happening.
I can assure everyone that if Obama is elected, we can all kiss
our jobs goodbye. Or maybe we should all just move to Mexico,
since there will no longer be anybody there!
Community Organizer-in-Chief
"I don't intend to lose this election. John McCain doesn't know what he's up against."—Senator Barack ObamaNow that’s an ominous statement wouldn’t you say, someone campaigning to become President of the United States of America using a veiled threat of some sort against his rival and just what is Senator McCain up against when he campaigns against Barack Hussein Obama?
Sen. Obama is a community organizer turned politician by his own admission, so just what is a community organizer any way?
I’m thinking if placing lipstick on a pig still results in a pig then a community organizer elected to the White house will still be nothing more than a community organizer.
Here’s a truth, you can put a community organizer in the White house but you’ll still have a community organizer and not a President. Any ways here’s how Senator Obama is connected with the notorious left wing political agitation group ACORN.
[…]ACORN noticed him when he was organizing on the far south side of the city with the Developing Communities Project.So Sen. Obama was a community organizer for a community group with the acronym ACORN or the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, that is a radical left wing agitation group which still to this day receives federal funding for its voters registration arm.
He was a very good organizer. When he returned from law school, we asked him to help us with a lawsuit to challenge the state of Illinois’ refusal to abide by the National Voting Rights Act, also known as motor voter… Obama took the case, known as ACORN vs. Edgar (the name of the Republican governor at the time) and we won.
Obama then went on to run a voter registration project with Project VOTE in 1992 that made it possible for Carol Moseley Braun to win the Senate that year. Project VOTE delivered 50,000 newly registered voters in that campaign (ACORN delivered about 5000 of them).
Since then, we have invited Obama to our leadership training sessions to run the session on power every year, and, as a result, many of our newly developing leaders got to know him before he ever ran for office.
Thus, it was natural for many of us to be active volunteers in his first campaign for State Senate and then his failed bid for U.S. Congress in 1996. By the time he ran for U.S. Senate, we were old friends.—Toni Foulks, a representative of ACORN (see source)
But registering voters is not all that ACORN does, ACORN attempts to rally the vote for particular candidates but first what is ACORN: (see video)
ACORN also holds Rallies as a political action group mostly encouraging those who would identify with left wing ideology to get out and vote. (see video)
There have been accusations of corrupt practices regarding collection of voter registration cards and ACORN Voter registration collectors falsifying voter registration cards.(see video)
Maybe Senator Obama is correct, maybe Senator McCain doesn’t know what he’s going up against. Maybe Senator Obama should tell us all exactly what ACORN is about. In the least tell us what role they are playing in this election.
…according to ACORN, Obama trained its Chicago members in leadership seminars for several years in the early '90s. And Obama sat on the boards of the Woods Fund and Joyce Foundation, both of which poured money into ACORN's coffers.Tony Rezko,Weatherman terrorist William Ayers, Rev. Jeremiah Wright and now ACORN, just another in a long line of radical affiliations in the life of the most Liberal and inexperienced Democrat candidate to run for president of the United States Sen Barack Hussein Obama the Democrat presumptive Community Organizer-in-Chief.
Naturally, ACORN's political action committee has warmly endorsed his presidential candidacy.—Michelle Malkin
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
The Commander-in-Speech
Just what are Senator Barack Obama’s accomplishments? Two autobiographies; “Dreams From My Father”, “The Audacity of Hope” and a speech that he gave at the 2004 Democrat Convention. In just under 4 years Obama has only 143 working days in the Senate and has no legislative accomplishes.
In addition to that Obama hasn’t chaired any major committees in just under 4 years of service in the U.S. Senate and now He’s running for the highest political office in the United States of America.
Prior to that Sen. Obama was a 5 year part-time Illinois state legislator with no major legislative history in the Illinois state senate.
Obama who said in 2004 after he won the U.S. Senate Illinois senate seat that he would not consider running for the Presidency in 2008 because he wouldn’t know what he’d be doing. So essentially Sen. Obama felt that he wouldn’t have the experience or the qualifications to ran for president in 2008, boy what a difference 143 working days in the Senate make. NOT!!!
So the Democrat electorate by-passed all the more qualified candidates; Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana, Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware, Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut, Senator John Edwards of No. Carolina, Congressman Dennis Kucinich Ohio, Governor William B. Richardson of New Mexico and Senator Hillary Clinton of New York, all who have more experience than Barack Obama yet Democrats threw experience aside because they wanted the “Speech.”
Even though everyone knows that Sen. Obama isn’t experience enough to do the job Obama seems to believes that campaigning for the presidency is all the experience one needs to be President. (see video)
In spite of the fact that Obama doesn’t have the experience he just might pull it off and become the first affirmative action Black candidate to become president. (see video)
And the speech that got Sen. Obama launched on the trajectory to become the first Black President of these United States of America, I thought that you might enjoy seeing some excerpts from Senator Obama’s 2004 Democratic Convention speech. The speech that made Sen. Obama instantly qualified to became President. (see video)
All Hail to the Commander-in-Speech Barack Hussein Obama! And thank God for general elections where Independents and Republicans wouldn’t let the Democrat’s mistake punish us with an Inadequate Black Male President in the person of one Senator Barack Hussein Obama!
Tuesday, September 09, 2008
N.O.W.
The “women” of NOW, best described as very liberal,
feminine men, would do themselves a very big favor
if they would return to their roots.
Their original purpose was for all women to come
together and support one another. It was to have
been an organization, national in scope, to foster the
fair and equal treatment of women in all walks of life.
What a joke this has turned out to be. It has been
hijacked by the far left, and is presently being used
as a “hit” group for the ultra-liberals in the country,
from which to launch their unwarranted personal attacks.
This is an organization that should have been touting the
accomplishments of Sarah Palin, instead of trying to
destroy her. But....... I guess now, when you join such a
group as this, you do so with the hope of banning together
with a bunch of wanna-bees, who are nothing more than
frustrated women with penis-envy, you get what you deserve.
They will go plodding on, keeping the polyester suit makers
in business, in a vain attempt to present a strong front for a
failing organization.
False nomenclature, without a doubt. Maybe they should
consider renaming this group. NoOvarianWhining!
feminine men, would do themselves a very big favor
if they would return to their roots.
Their original purpose was for all women to come
together and support one another. It was to have
been an organization, national in scope, to foster the
fair and equal treatment of women in all walks of life.
What a joke this has turned out to be. It has been
hijacked by the far left, and is presently being used
as a “hit” group for the ultra-liberals in the country,
from which to launch their unwarranted personal attacks.
This is an organization that should have been touting the
accomplishments of Sarah Palin, instead of trying to
destroy her. But....... I guess now, when you join such a
group as this, you do so with the hope of banning together
with a bunch of wanna-bees, who are nothing more than
frustrated women with penis-envy, you get what you deserve.
They will go plodding on, keeping the polyester suit makers
in business, in a vain attempt to present a strong front for a
failing organization.
False nomenclature, without a doubt. Maybe they should
consider renaming this group. NoOvarianWhining!
Obama’s Lipstick Smears!!!!
Well, I guess there is no doubt about it now. The
so-called “outsider” in politics, the man who could
change Washington, has shown the world that he
is simply a run-of-the-mill. hack politician, who much
against his claims, deals in the dirty politics of
personal attacks...... and from the bottom of the deck.
He has a history of this. He gained his position in
Chicago by having his opponents eliminated on
“technicalities”, leaving a clear field for him, with
no opposition. He deftly managed to sweep Hillary
from contention, and then, instead of giving her at
least the position she had earned, he works a deal with
her to help her pay a portion of her campaign debt.
All the traits of the old, corrupt, Chicago democratic
machine!!!!
This wanna-be is nothing more than a gutter-snipe
in an expensive suit. And the entire Democratic
campaign is in a conspiracy to try to destroy Sarah
Palin, who has resurrected the Republican party.
Suddenly, the Democratic men seem to be very
interested in “lipstick”. First Biden took a swipe
at Sarah Palin, using the word, and then Obama did.
It was no coincidence, and one that was certainly
not lost on his bevy of followers, when Obama took
an oh-so-obvious, dirty swipe at Sarah Palin. Her
statement during her acceptance speech, that "the
difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull is
lipstick", was with deliberate viciousness, mimicked
by Senator Obama. His radical followers reveled
in his insulting remark that, “you can put lipstick on
a pig, and it’s still a pig”. I take this as meant to be
a swipe at all women....... even the ultra-liberal hacks
at organizations such as NOW.
We have already heard his defenders knocking
themselves out, trying to explain that he was referring to
John McCain, and not Sarah Palin. But tell me!
What on earth has lipstick to do with John McCain?..and
what are the chances of any opposing candidate
“accidentally” using the word “lipstick” in a speech
only one week after the first female candidate did???
You figure it out!
I guess when you feel yourself seriously slipping in the
polls, you pull out all the stops, no matter how dirty!
so-called “outsider” in politics, the man who could
change Washington, has shown the world that he
is simply a run-of-the-mill. hack politician, who much
against his claims, deals in the dirty politics of
personal attacks...... and from the bottom of the deck.
He has a history of this. He gained his position in
Chicago by having his opponents eliminated on
“technicalities”, leaving a clear field for him, with
no opposition. He deftly managed to sweep Hillary
from contention, and then, instead of giving her at
least the position she had earned, he works a deal with
her to help her pay a portion of her campaign debt.
All the traits of the old, corrupt, Chicago democratic
machine!!!!
This wanna-be is nothing more than a gutter-snipe
in an expensive suit. And the entire Democratic
campaign is in a conspiracy to try to destroy Sarah
Palin, who has resurrected the Republican party.
Suddenly, the Democratic men seem to be very
interested in “lipstick”. First Biden took a swipe
at Sarah Palin, using the word, and then Obama did.
It was no coincidence, and one that was certainly
not lost on his bevy of followers, when Obama took
an oh-so-obvious, dirty swipe at Sarah Palin. Her
statement during her acceptance speech, that "the
difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull is
lipstick", was with deliberate viciousness, mimicked
by Senator Obama. His radical followers reveled
in his insulting remark that, “you can put lipstick on
a pig, and it’s still a pig”. I take this as meant to be
a swipe at all women....... even the ultra-liberal hacks
at organizations such as NOW.
We have already heard his defenders knocking
themselves out, trying to explain that he was referring to
John McCain, and not Sarah Palin. But tell me!
What on earth has lipstick to do with John McCain?..and
what are the chances of any opposing candidate
“accidentally” using the word “lipstick” in a speech
only one week after the first female candidate did???
You figure it out!
I guess when you feel yourself seriously slipping in the
polls, you pull out all the stops, no matter how dirty!
These Democrats just don’t get it
Sen. Biden is a man of distinguished public service. That doesn’t excuse poor logic or bad facts.There is no wonder Liberals and Democrats are so confused with leaders like Sens. Barack “Above my pay grade” Obama and Joe “I love to hear myself speak” Biden, Democrats can’t help but except inferior ideas and clouded truth.
Asked when life begins, Sen. Biden said that, “It is a personal and private issue.” But in reality, modern biology knows exactly when human life begins; at the moment of conception. Religion has nothing to do with it.
People might argue when human “personhood” begins – though that leads public policy in very dangerous directions – but no one can any longer clam that the beginning of life is a matter of religious opinion.—Archbishop Charles J. Chaput
If you saw Meet the Press last Sunday you probably missed Tim Russert like I did. Tom Brokaw who hosted the program is no Tim Russert, Brokaw is more like a dithering old drunk slurring his words and ideas like an Anon devotee on weekend leave. Hi Tom!
Mr. Brokaw brought up the subject that speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi just got skewered for by the Catholic Church, Abortion. (see story)
The Church in a rare rebuke which was directed at Pelosi, declared the Congresswoman’s views regarding abortion are contradictory to the Churches teachings and her ideas regarding abortion are simply wrong.
Not only that Sen. Obama blew this same question weeks ago at the Saddleback Church so badly that he is now apologizing for being to flippant in his answer. It must be tiring having to go back and constantly correct what you’ve said, Sen. Obama.
Since Obama and Pelosi had so much trouble with this question Brokaw thought he would allow Biden to clean it up, a third bite of the apple if you will. Sen. Biden is asked by the drunk sounding Brokaw when life begins and this was Biden’s response: (see video)
WHAT? Does Biden think because of his much speaking that he is fooling any one? Well that answer Sen. Biden was a hot mess! So much so, that Sen. Biden, a Catholic , drew his own person rebuke from the Catholic church by Archbishop Charles J. Chaput. (see letter)
In his Meet the Press interview, Sen. Biden used a morally exhausted argument that American Catholics have been hearing for 40 years; i.e., that Catholics can’t “impose” their religiously based views on the rest of the country.If only Democrats in the Democrat Party were as discerning as the Church, Obama, Biden and Pelosi would be excommunicated from the Party for reckless distortion of the truth.
But resistance to abortion is a matter of human rights, not religious opinion. And the senator knows very well as a lawmaker that all law involves the imposition of some people’s convictions on everyone else. That is the nature of the law.
American Catholics have allowed themselves to be bullied into accepting the destruction of more than a million developing unborn children a year. Other people have imposed their “pro-choice” beliefs on American society without any remorse for decades.—Archbishop Charles J. Chaput
Democrats may be accepting of lying and delusional politicians like Obama, Biden and Pelosi but come November Democrats may find that the other half of the country Independents and Conservatives, like the Church, have a higher standard for truth telling.
As well Independents and Conservatives have a much higher standard for candidate qualifications.
Monday, September 08, 2008
OBAMA'S "NOT EXACTLY'S"
(1.) Selma Got Me Born - NOT EXACTLY, your parents felt safe enough to have you in 1961 - Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in 1965. (Google' Obama Selma ' for his full March 4, 2007 speech and articles about its various untruths.)
(2.) Father Was A Goat Herder - NOT EXACTLY, he was a privileged, well educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government.
(3.) Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter - NOT EXACTLY, he was part of one of the most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever had.
(4.) My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom - NOT EXACTLY, your cousin Raila Odinga has created mass violence in attempting to overturn a legitimate election in 2007, in Kenya It is the first widespread violence in decades. The current government is pro-American but Odinga wants to overthrow it and establish Muslim Sharia law. Your half-brother, Abongo Obama, is Odinga's follower. You interrupted your New Hampshire campaigning to speak to Odinga on the phone.
Obama's cousin Odinga in Kenya ran for president and tried to get Sharia muslim law in place there. When Odinga lost the elections, his followers have burned Christians' homes and then burned men, women and children alive in a Christian church where they took shelter.. Obama SUPPORTED his cousin before the election process here started. Google Obama and Odinga and see what you get. No one wants to know the truth.
(5.) My Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian - NOT EXACTLY, she does her daily Salat prayers at 5 AM according to her own interviews. Not to mention, Christianity wouldn't allow her to have been one of 14 wives to 1 man.
(6.) My Name is African Swahili - NOT EXACTLY, your name is Arabic and 'Baraka' (from which Barack came) means 'blessed' in that language. Hussein is also Arabic and so is Obama.
Barack Hussein Obama is not half black. If elected, he would be the first Arab-American President, not the first black President. Barack Hussein Obama is 50% Caucasian from his mother's side and 43.75% Arabic and 6.25% African Negro from his father's side. While Barack Hussein Obama's father was from Kenya , his father's family was mainly Arabs.. Barack Hussein Obama's father was only 12..5% African Negro and 87.5% Arab (his father's birth certificate even states he's Arab, not African Negro). From....and for more....go to.....
http://www..arcadeathome.com/newsboy.phtml?Barack_Hussein_Obama_-_Arab-American,_only_6..25%_African
(7.) I Never Practiced Islam - NOT EXACTLY, you practiced it daily at school, where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that faith for 31 years, until your wife made you change, so you could run for office.
4-3-08 Article "Obama was 'quite religious in islam'" http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=60559
(8.) My School In Indonesia was Christian - NOT EXACTLY, you were registered as Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies for making faces (check your own book).
February 28, 2008. Kristoff from the New York Times a year ago: Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it'll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset." This is just one example of what Pamela is talking about when she says "Obama's narrative is being altered, enhanced and manipulated to whitewash troubling facts."
(9.) I Was Fluent In Indonesian - NOT EXACTLY, not one teacher says you could speak the language.
(10.) Because I Lived In Indonesia , I Have More Foreign Experience - NOT EXACTLY, you were there from the ages of 6 to 10, and couldn't even speak the language. What did you learn, how to study the Koran and watch cartoons.
(11.) I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs - NOT EXACTLY, except for Africa (surprise) and the Middle East (bigger surprise), you have never been anywhere else on the planet and thus have NO experience with our closest allies.
(12.) I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion - NOT EXACTLY, you were quite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no mention of Kenya and no mention of struggle to identify - your classmates said you were just fine.
(13.) An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office - NOT EXACTLY, Ebony has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist.
(14.) A Life Magazine Article Changed My outlook on Life - NOT EXACTLY, Life has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist.
(15.) I Won't Run On A National Ticket In '08 - NOT EXACTLY, here you are, despite saying, live on TV,
that you would not have enough experience by then, and you are all about having experience first.
(16.) Voting "Present" is Common In Illinois Senate - NOT EXACTLY, they are common for YOU, but not many others have 130 NO-VOTES.
(17.) Oops, I Mis-voted - NOT EXACTLY, only when caught by church groups and Democrats, did you beg to change your "mis-vote".
(18.) I Was A Professor Of Law - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.
(19.) I Was A Constitutional Lawyer - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.
(20.) Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill - NOT EXACTLY, you didn't write it, introduce it, change it, or create it.
(21.) The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass - NOT EXACTLY, it took just 14 days from start to finish.
(22.) I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill - NOT EXACTLY, your bill was rejected by your own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation - mainly because of your Nuclear donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came.
(23.) I Have Released My State Records - NOT EXACTLY, as of March, 2008, state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be released, exposing all the special interests pork hidden within.
(24.) I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess - NOT EXACTLY, you were part of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld Gardens . You failed to mention anyone else but yourself, in your books.
(25.) My Economics Bill Will Help America - NOT EXACTLY, your 111 economic policies were just combined into a proposal which lost 99-0, and even YOU voted against your own bill.
(26.) I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois - NOT EXACTLY, even your own supporters claim to have not seen BOLD action on your part.
(27.) I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year - NOT EXACTLY, they were not YOUR bills, but rather handed to you, after their creation by a fellow Senator, to assist you in a future bid for higher office.
(28.) No One on my campaign contacted Canada about NAFTA - NOT EXACTLY, the Candian Government issued the names and a memo of the conversation your campaign had with them.
(29.) I Am Tough On Terrorism - NOT EXACTLY, you missed the Iran Resolution vote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah supports the destruction of Israel .
(30.) I Want All Votes To Count - NOT EXACTLY, you said let the delegates decide.
(31.) I Want Americans To Decide - NOT EXACTLY, you prefer caucuses that limit the vote, confuse the voters, force a public vote, and only operate during small windows of time.
(32.) I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate - NOT EXACTLY, you passed 26, most of which you didn't write yourself.
(33.) I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics - NOT EXACTLY, you used tactics to eliminate Alice Palmer from running against you.
(34.) I Don't Take PAC Money - NOT EXACTLY, you take loads of it.
(35.) I don't Have Lobbyists - NOT EXACTLY, you have over 47 lobbyists, and counting.
(36.) My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad - NOT EXACTLY, your own campaign worker made the ad on his Apple in one afternoon.
(37.) I Have Always Been Against Iraq - NOT EXACTLY, you weren't in office to vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time.
(38.) I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care - NOT EXACTLY, your plan leaves us all to pay for the 15,000,000 who don't have to buy it
GOD HELP US IF WE JUST SIT IDLY BY AND LET THIS PERSON BECOME OUR NEXT PRESIDENT. IT WOULD BE SUICIDAL FOR US TO DO NOTHING TO PREVENT THIS FROM HAPPENING. PASS THIS ON TO ALL THE ONES YOU VALUE, JUST AS I AM DOING. IT'S TIME THE "SILENT MAJORITY" TAKE A STAND! GET OUT AND VOTE! PLEASE!
(2.) Father Was A Goat Herder - NOT EXACTLY, he was a privileged, well educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government.
(3.) Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter - NOT EXACTLY, he was part of one of the most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever had.
(4.) My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom - NOT EXACTLY, your cousin Raila Odinga has created mass violence in attempting to overturn a legitimate election in 2007, in Kenya It is the first widespread violence in decades. The current government is pro-American but Odinga wants to overthrow it and establish Muslim Sharia law. Your half-brother, Abongo Obama, is Odinga's follower. You interrupted your New Hampshire campaigning to speak to Odinga on the phone.
Obama's cousin Odinga in Kenya ran for president and tried to get Sharia muslim law in place there. When Odinga lost the elections, his followers have burned Christians' homes and then burned men, women and children alive in a Christian church where they took shelter.. Obama SUPPORTED his cousin before the election process here started. Google Obama and Odinga and see what you get. No one wants to know the truth.
(5.) My Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian - NOT EXACTLY, she does her daily Salat prayers at 5 AM according to her own interviews. Not to mention, Christianity wouldn't allow her to have been one of 14 wives to 1 man.
(6.) My Name is African Swahili - NOT EXACTLY, your name is Arabic and 'Baraka' (from which Barack came) means 'blessed' in that language. Hussein is also Arabic and so is Obama.
Barack Hussein Obama is not half black. If elected, he would be the first Arab-American President, not the first black President. Barack Hussein Obama is 50% Caucasian from his mother's side and 43.75% Arabic and 6.25% African Negro from his father's side. While Barack Hussein Obama's father was from Kenya , his father's family was mainly Arabs.. Barack Hussein Obama's father was only 12..5% African Negro and 87.5% Arab (his father's birth certificate even states he's Arab, not African Negro). From....and for more....go to.....
http://www..arcadeathome.com/newsboy.phtml?Barack_Hussein_Obama_-_Arab-American,_only_6..25%_African
(7.) I Never Practiced Islam - NOT EXACTLY, you practiced it daily at school, where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that faith for 31 years, until your wife made you change, so you could run for office.
4-3-08 Article "Obama was 'quite religious in islam'" http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=60559
(8.) My School In Indonesia was Christian - NOT EXACTLY, you were registered as Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies for making faces (check your own book).
February 28, 2008. Kristoff from the New York Times a year ago: Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it'll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset." This is just one example of what Pamela is talking about when she says "Obama's narrative is being altered, enhanced and manipulated to whitewash troubling facts."
(9.) I Was Fluent In Indonesian - NOT EXACTLY, not one teacher says you could speak the language.
(10.) Because I Lived In Indonesia , I Have More Foreign Experience - NOT EXACTLY, you were there from the ages of 6 to 10, and couldn't even speak the language. What did you learn, how to study the Koran and watch cartoons.
(11.) I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs - NOT EXACTLY, except for Africa (surprise) and the Middle East (bigger surprise), you have never been anywhere else on the planet and thus have NO experience with our closest allies.
(12.) I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion - NOT EXACTLY, you were quite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no mention of Kenya and no mention of struggle to identify - your classmates said you were just fine.
(13.) An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office - NOT EXACTLY, Ebony has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist.
(14.) A Life Magazine Article Changed My outlook on Life - NOT EXACTLY, Life has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist.
(15.) I Won't Run On A National Ticket In '08 - NOT EXACTLY, here you are, despite saying, live on TV,
that you would not have enough experience by then, and you are all about having experience first.
(16.) Voting "Present" is Common In Illinois Senate - NOT EXACTLY, they are common for YOU, but not many others have 130 NO-VOTES.
(17.) Oops, I Mis-voted - NOT EXACTLY, only when caught by church groups and Democrats, did you beg to change your "mis-vote".
(18.) I Was A Professor Of Law - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.
(19.) I Was A Constitutional Lawyer - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.
(20.) Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill - NOT EXACTLY, you didn't write it, introduce it, change it, or create it.
(21.) The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass - NOT EXACTLY, it took just 14 days from start to finish.
(22.) I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill - NOT EXACTLY, your bill was rejected by your own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation - mainly because of your Nuclear donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came.
(23.) I Have Released My State Records - NOT EXACTLY, as of March, 2008, state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be released, exposing all the special interests pork hidden within.
(24.) I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess - NOT EXACTLY, you were part of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld Gardens . You failed to mention anyone else but yourself, in your books.
(25.) My Economics Bill Will Help America - NOT EXACTLY, your 111 economic policies were just combined into a proposal which lost 99-0, and even YOU voted against your own bill.
(26.) I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois - NOT EXACTLY, even your own supporters claim to have not seen BOLD action on your part.
(27.) I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year - NOT EXACTLY, they were not YOUR bills, but rather handed to you, after their creation by a fellow Senator, to assist you in a future bid for higher office.
(28.) No One on my campaign contacted Canada about NAFTA - NOT EXACTLY, the Candian Government issued the names and a memo of the conversation your campaign had with them.
(29.) I Am Tough On Terrorism - NOT EXACTLY, you missed the Iran Resolution vote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah supports the destruction of Israel .
(30.) I Want All Votes To Count - NOT EXACTLY, you said let the delegates decide.
(31.) I Want Americans To Decide - NOT EXACTLY, you prefer caucuses that limit the vote, confuse the voters, force a public vote, and only operate during small windows of time.
(32.) I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate - NOT EXACTLY, you passed 26, most of which you didn't write yourself.
(33.) I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics - NOT EXACTLY, you used tactics to eliminate Alice Palmer from running against you.
(34.) I Don't Take PAC Money - NOT EXACTLY, you take loads of it.
(35.) I don't Have Lobbyists - NOT EXACTLY, you have over 47 lobbyists, and counting.
(36.) My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad - NOT EXACTLY, your own campaign worker made the ad on his Apple in one afternoon.
(37.) I Have Always Been Against Iraq - NOT EXACTLY, you weren't in office to vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time.
(38.) I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care - NOT EXACTLY, your plan leaves us all to pay for the 15,000,000 who don't have to buy it
GOD HELP US IF WE JUST SIT IDLY BY AND LET THIS PERSON BECOME OUR NEXT PRESIDENT. IT WOULD BE SUICIDAL FOR US TO DO NOTHING TO PREVENT THIS FROM HAPPENING. PASS THIS ON TO ALL THE ONES YOU VALUE, JUST AS I AM DOING. IT'S TIME THE "SILENT MAJORITY" TAKE A STAND! GET OUT AND VOTE! PLEASE!
The Left is Hatin’ on Palin
She is all woman no doubt; wife, mother, business woman, executive and now Republican Vice-President nominee. So who is trying to destroy her and why?
Sen. Obama is because he’s wanted to be President since he was in Kindergarten only thing is compared to Sarah Palin’s accomplishments Sen. Obama is exposed as the inadequate Black male that Hillary Clinton backer Harriet Christian described him as.
Obama’s thin résumé and premature campaign to be President is a gross overstep which he and the Democrat Party is betting that Americans will overlook if he uses the standard Democrat playbook of 1) Bush bashing, 2) talking America’s war effort down, 3) talking the economy down, 4) linking Senator McCain with President Bush, then 5) talking Sen. McCain down and finally 6) attempting to destroying Gov. Sarah Palin.
Sen. Obama is not the only one who wishes Gov. Palin’s political career ill the radical Liberal Left sees Sen. McCain’s choice for Vice President as a threat too.
From the instant of Palin's designation on Friday, August 29, the American left went into a collective mass seizure from which it shows no sign of emerging.Gov. Palin is seen as a threat to the Left’s narrative that a woman must choose between career and family and that only the Democrat Party would allow a minority the opportunity to be President of the United States. (see story)
The left blogosphere and elite media have, for the moment, joined forces and become indistinguishable from each other, and from the supermarket tabloids, in their desire to find and use anything that will criminalize and/or humiliate Palin and her family.
In sharp contrast to the yearlong restraint shown toward truthful reports about John Edwards's affair, bizarre rumors have been reported as news, and, according to McCain campaign director Steve Schmidt, nationally known members of the elite media have besieged him with preposterous demands.—Jeffrey Bell, the weekly standard
If the McCain Palin ticket should win that would mean that Hillary Clinton would not be the presumptive first woman President of the United States of America, Gov. Palin would. Palin would because as Vice President in addition to her already solid résumé Gov. Palin would have more real experience than any other woman who could run for the office only the left means to prevent that by destroying Sarah Palin.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)