Every Last Iota of a Cracker I Hate It!

I hate White people all of them. Every last iota of a cracker I hate it! —King Samir Shabazz, Head of the Philadelphia New Black Panther Party

In defense of Dr. Laura Schlessinger and all Adult thinking people in America

I received a phone call from a Black Liberal friend who knows that I write this blog. He wanted to alert me of Dr. Laura Schlessinger’s most recent travail with the archaic notion of freedom of speech in America.

According to my friend, Dr. Laura said the word Nigger. After a lingering pause, my friend obviously waiting for my response, I said half jokingly, “…and then she killed someone?” but to my friend this was no laughing matter. So I asked, did Dr. Laura call someone a Nigger or did she simply say the word? He said that he didn’t hear it himself he just heard Al Sharpen talking about it on CNN. “You can turn to it and see yourself,” he said.

I told him that a T.V. wasn’t available to me right at the moment but I would look into it and get back to him. He said, “You’re good at researching on the net I’m sure you can find it.” First, I assured him that Dr. Laura is a good person and a consummate professional. I said that I’m sure that this was a complete misunderstanding. I thanked him for the “heads-up” and then we hung up.

I did query the subject. I think I put in Dr. Laura and the word “Nigger” and sure enough, the net was on fire with flames of condemnation, which were threatening to lap up the career of Dr. Laura.

The fact that she dare to said “the Word” the “N-Word” the Mother of all negative epithets was enough to get the Shirley Sherrod NAACP types all riled up, my friend included.

Media Matters website, the conspicuously Left Wing radical creation of Hillary Clinton and George Soros, posted a story of how they heroically were able to ferret out the original tapes of the “Niggergate” show after of course the sinister Dr. Laura show attempted to hide the evidence of Dr. Laura’s blatant racism. So I listened to Media Matters unedited “Full Audio” of the incident. (hear 6:42min audio)





Now as I see it Dr. Laura was attempting to have an intelligent Adult conservation with a caller who obviously is caught in a conundrum of her own making. The caller, identified as Jay, chose to marry into an interracial situation while apparently she harbors latent racial attitudes and resentments herself. The underlying problem is Jay doesn’t have the psychological makeup or maturity to handle an interracial marriage and all of the things that come along with that marriage.

And as an aside Jay asked the question, “Is it ever okay to say the word Nigger?” Which is a completely different subject but let’s examine that.

Jay is Black woman who is married to a White man. She is complaining about the “racial attitudes” of her family and friends. And now she is suggesting that there are words in the American lexicon that are strictly off limits? And to whom are these words off limits? Only to White people. So just what are these words?

Well after a brief survey I’ve come up with a list of seven words and phrases that White people in President Barry Hussein Soetoro’s America can under no circumstances utter, no matter the context, they are:
1. Nigger
2. Colored
3. Boy
4. Nappy Headed Ho, or Hos
5. Slavery or Slave
6. Picking Cotton, or in the field picking cotton
7. Coon

I’m sure that other ethnicities have words or phrases that are banned from usage by White people. You’re free to email me with your choices. (TPFIC)

Now that it's made absolutely clear that in a free country like America that there are ineffable words for the “Whiteman,” let it also be known that in President Soetoro's America we can all happily go about our business of voter intimidation of White people and advocating hatred of White people. All while advocating for the killing of White people and their Cracker White babies while the Soetoro Justice Department stands by and lends its support. (see 1:19min video)

There is too much serious business going on in the Black community to be out here sliding through south street with white dirty Cracker whore cunts on our arms. And we calling ourselves Black men with African garb on. What the hell is wrong with you Black man?—King Samir Shabazz

Dr. Laura you have my apologies for blatant double standard and the attitude of racism that was unfairly thrust upon you. King Samir Shabazz and your caller Jay are the reasons why we cannot advance pass racial difference in America.

I also apologize to you for the puerile thinking of some Blacks who think it is perfectly fair to have exclusive right to use the word Nigger. These Blacks believe that they have the right to use racial pejoratives, calling White people Crackers, while the mere mentioning of the word Nigger by a White person in any context is an offense and affront to the dead cold body of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. This is wrong.

As your caller, Jay demonstrated Blacks are just as cowardice as anyone else when it comes to frank discusses regarding race. (see 2:11 min video)





I know that you were forced to apologize for saying the sacred “word,” a word that is above every other word (unless of course a Black person uses it.) What is ashamed is that Eric Holder was correct. There are cowards among us who are afraid to talk about race in an adult and mature way.

Those cowards are the President, Mr. Holder and all Black people who subscribes to the hate the White man mentality.

Dr. Laura what has happened to you is a prime example why there is no honest talk about Race in this country.

All the opposition that is now lined up against you are the cowards that prevent open and honest discussion about race in this country. And they are not White neither! They are Black! These racial cowards and bigots are Black.

The Constitution is no longer in effect and we didn’t even know it

"Action should be taken by the Senate and should be taken by the House," he said. "They should serve notice on him and say, 'Mr. President, we love you but we want to tell you something. You're under a cloud of suspicion. We can't continue running this country with you in charge under this cloud. Now either you clear it up or you resign from office.'"—Maj. Gen Jerry Curry, Ret. Relaying what Congress should say to President Soetoro

Our public servants and military personnel all take an oath to protect and defend our Constitution. However, what if everyone from the President on down failed to keep their oath. What if no one carried out the oath to protect and defend our Constitution, would the Constitution still be in effect?

The answer is no. If the Constitution is not enforced, it is no longer in effect and for all intent and purposes, this is no longer the United States of America. For example, the non-enforcement of United States borders is in direct contradiction of the Constitutional mandate to protect every State against Invasion.

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion—Article III Section IV, U.S. Constitution

The Barry Hussein Soetoro administration has sued Arizona, a state that was attempting to protect and defend the Constitution. Soetoro, his justice department and Federal Judge Susan Bolden all violated their oaths to protect and defend the constitution by preventing the State of Arizona from doing so.

The Obama administration’s successful block of Arizona’s Constitutional right to protect itself from invasion, in addition the Federal government’s refusal to protect Arizona from illegal alien invasion means that the Constitution is no longer in effect. This means that we have entered an era of soft tyranny, an age when an Oligarchy issues rulings and judgments against the principles of the Constitution as Federal Judges Susan Bolden and Vaughan Walker have recently done. Therefore, the Constitution is invalidated.

"It shouldn't be the lieutenant colonels, sergeants and generals in the Army. It should be the congressman and senators on both sides of the issue asking this man to step up to the plate" to provide proof [of eligibility.]—Maj. Gen Jerry Curry, Ret.

Never is it so evident that the Constitution is no longer in effect as in the case of the ineligibility of Barry Hussein Soetoro. This man has hidden from the American people all of the vital records that would either confirm or deny his legitimacy. In effect, the United States government is operating as an illegitimate power in the world. (see article)

Lately, I find myself wondering, what would an illegitimate government look like?

Might it be one where – when the speaker of the House is asked for the constitutional authority that permits government-mandated health care – her response is: "Are you serious? Are you serious?"

Perhaps it would be a government where, when citizens demand to see evidence that the nation's highest elected official meets the qualifications set down in the Constitution to hold that office, all three branches of government spend public money to deny those concerned citizens that right.

Could it be a government that passes laws prohibiting criticism of its supporters and their "lifestyles" – and mandates criminal punishments against those who speak out – even when those "lifestyles" are socially destructive? –Craige McMillan, What would an Illegitimate government look like?

For the last 18 to 19 months from the U.S. Government it has been, “In yo face” of the American people. It has been, “You have no standing” to the American people.

By these examples it has been proven that if an Usurper actually illegitimately seized the highest elected office in the nation there is nothing that anyone in America can do about it if the person who as seized illegitimate power has a partisan Congress to aid and abet in a coup d’état of the United States of America.

This is particularly disturbing when there is evidence that president Soetoro was exploring ways to get rid of or getting around Article II of the Constitution as early as 2006. Sarah p. Herlihy a lawyer in a firm, which Soetoro was a member wrote a treatise-depicting article II of the Constitution as archaic and unfair to limit the presidency to only natural born citizens of the United States. All indications are that Ms. Herlihy wrote this on Soetoro’s behalf. (see below)

Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement Sarah p. Herlihy Feb 22 2006

Retired Maj. Gen Jerry Curry says that if president Soetoro had anything going for him in term of decency and honesty and the kind of whatever it takes to be a good American and be a good public servant, if he has any of that stuff, he would throw it all out of the window and say, 'Look folks. I'm an American citizen. I am native born. Tell me what you want to prove it and I will give it to you.

Honor, decency, honesty, patriotism, loyalty and trustworthiness, General Curry those traits may be typical of someone in the military but I don’t think you’ll find many in our government that we can count in those categories. Below are the oaths that are being broken by the president, his administration, Federal courts and our Congress.

If the border laws are not being enforced and If the Second Article of the Constitution isn’t being enforced we are living in days that the Constitution is no longer in effect. I bet that you didn’t even notice.

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President—Article II Section 1 U.S. Constitution

Following are the oaths that the president, the attorneys of the justice department and judges Susan Bolden and Vaughan Walker have violated or are violating on a daily basis.

Oath of office of the President of the United States of America :

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

Oath of office of the Congress of the United States of America :

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.*

*Note: This oath is also taken by the Vice President, members of the Cabinet, and all other civil and military officers and federal employees other than the President.

General Oath of Office for Federal Judges of the United States of America :

I do solemnly swear (or affirm), that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent on me, according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the Constitution, and laws of the United States. So help me God. *±

*In the United States , federal judges are required to take not just one, but two oaths. (see below)
± Oath of Office
USUS Oath of Office

###

Oaths of Office for Federal Judges of the United States of America :

I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as (Judge or Justice) under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.

I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

Military Oath

I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.[1]

All of these broken oaths and no one to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America which means that the Constitution is no longer in effect.

Bankrupt and didn’t know it: No, some did know it and Democrats didn’t Care

Well, we are out of money now. We are operating in deep deficits—president Barry Hussein Soetoro, Saturday, May 23, 2009

Laurence Kotlikoff’s Bloomberg article, “U.S. Is Bankrupt and We Didn’t Even Know It” is not accurate. (see article) Just after 4 months in office president Barry Hussein Soetoro interviewed with C-SPAN’s Steve Scully and told Scully that the United States of America was running in deficit. In Soetoro’s words, “…we are out of money now.” That was May 23, 2009. (see 3:02min video)



According to Mr. Kotlikoff what the Obama administration and the Democrat controlled Congress have been doing is not only wrong, Democrat policies are worsening America’s present and future.

Let’s get real. The U.S. is bankrupt. Neither spending more nor taxing less will help the country pay its bills.
What it can and must do is radically simplify its tax, health-care, retirement and financial systems, each of which is a complete mess. But this is the good news. It means they can each be redesigned to achieve their legitimate purposes at much lower cost and, in the process, revitalize the economy. –Laurence Kotlikoff

If what is needed to fix the economy is simplification in all areas the Obama administration and Democrat Congress has done the exact opposite.
Democrats have used the American fiscal crisis to advance the most radical and costly social agenda in the History of the United States. They have introduced stealth tax increases on the middle class as well as punitive tax increases on the so-called wealthy.

Democrats have passed 2,074 pages of complicated and deceptive health-care policies and have made a total and complete mess of U.S. business, financial and retirement sectors. Democrats have this country bankrupt now. You and I may be unaware of just how devastated the American situation is, but Democrats have been prophesying the demise of America for a long, long time.

[T]his "brief moment in history" when the US had pre-eminent military, economic and political power, would not last.

"This is just a period, a few decades this will last, and I think that all of us who are Americans should think about this and ask ourselves how do we wish this moment to be judged 50 years from now," –Former President Bill Clinton (see story)

And as I’ve said, 4 months into his presidency Barry Hussein Soetoro told America that we were effectively bankrupt but instead of being fiscally responsible and instead of pushing an immediate austerity national program Democrats went on the largest expansion of government and the most costliest government spending program in the history of the United States.

After Obama’s Global Warming win in the House of Representatives he moved immediately to hawk his universal health care reform. What this means to the American people is a mountain of debt so insurmountable that it is breaking the back of the U.S. economy by an unbearable weight on taxpayers at a time that the American people suffer the highest unemployment rate since 1948, the American economy can ill afford the grandiose socialist schemes of the Obama Democrat Party at this time.

It is the weight of both Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the $700billion dollar bailout, the $787billion dollar stimulus package, $161billion Global warming cap and trade taxes(if the Democrat controlled Senate passes their version of the global warming bill too) , $1.6trillion dollars of taxes for Obama Health Care reforms (if Congress gives Obama what he wants). In addition because Democrats mismanaged the first $787billion dollar bailout there is even talk of a second multi-billion dollar bailout all new taxes on an unemployed and underemployed American people. It's beginning to appear that they don't care about the consequences of their actions!

These new taxes would be more taxes levied on the American people than any other time in American history and more taxes imposed upon the American people than by any other President and Congress in the history of this country.—Alaphiah (source)

Congress did pass a second$26 Billion dollar stimulus bill that they deceptively called a jobs bill.

The president and Democrats knew before they forced through the most costly spending program in the history of the United States. They did this in the middle of the greatest financial depression since the great depression. Some of their irresponsible spending includes but is not limited to:

• $50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts
• $380 million in the Senate bill for the Women, Infants and Children program
• $300 million for grants to combat violence against women
• $2 billion for federal child-care block grants
• $6 billion for university building projects
• $15 billion for boosting Pell Grant college scholarships
• $4 billion for job-training programs, including $1.2 billion for “youths” up to the age of 24
• $1 billion for community-development block grants
• $4.2 billion for “neighborhood stabilization activities”
• $650 million for digital-TV coupons; $90 million to educate “vulnerable populations”
• $145 billion for “Making Work Pay” tax credits
• $83 billion for the earned income credit
• $150 million for the Smithsonian
• $34 million to renovate the Department of Commerce headquarters
• $500 million for improvement projects for National Institutes of Health facilities
• $44 million for repairs to Department of Agriculture headquarters
• $350 million for Agriculture Department computers
• $88 million to help move the Public Health Service into a new building
• $448 million for constructing a new Homeland Security Department headquarters
• $600 million to convert the federal auto fleet to hybrids
• $450 million for NASA (carve-out for “climate-research missions”)
• $600 million for NOAA (carve-out for “climate modeling”)
• $1 billion for the Census Bureau
• $4.5 billion for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
• $850 million for Amtrak
• $87 million for a polar icebreaking ship
• $1.7 billion for the National Park System
• $55 million for Historic Preservation Fund
• $7.6 billion for “rural community advancement programs”
• $150 million for agricultural-commodity purchases
• $150 million for “producers of livestock, honeybees, and farm-raised fish”
• $2 billion for renewable-energy research ($400 million for global-warming research)
• $2 billion for a “clean coal” power plant in Illinois
• $6.2 billion for the Weatherization Assistance Program
• $3.5 billion for energy-efficiency and conservation block grants
• $3.4 billion for the State Energy Program
• $200 million for state and local electric-transport projects
• $300 million for energy-efficient-appliance rebate programs
• $400 million for hybrid cars for state and local governments
• $1 billion for the manufacturing of advanced batteries
• $1.5 billion for green-technology loan guarantees
• $8 billion for innovative-technology loan-guarantee program
• $2.4 billion for carbon-capture demonstration projects
• $4.5 billion for electricity grid

And the latest addition to this insanity:
$300 million for electric “golf carts” (source)

On May 23, 2009 the president told us that America was bankrupt and then when on the greatest spending spree in the history of the United States of America.

SCULLY: You know the numbers, $1.7 trillion debt, a national deficit of $11 trillion. At what point do we run out of money?

OBAMA: Well, we are out of money now. We are operating in deep deficits, not caused by any decisions we've made on health care so far. This is a consequence of the crisis that we've seen and in fact, our failure to make some good decisions on health care over the last several decades.

So we've got a short-term problem, which is we had to spend a lot of money to salvage our financial system, we had to deal with the auto companies, a huge recession which drains tax revenue at the same time it's putting more pressure on governments to provide unemployment insurance or make sure that food stamps are available for people who have been laid off.

So we have a short-term problem and we also have a long-term problem. The short-term problem is dwarfed by the long-term problem. And the long-term problem is Medicaid and Medicare. If we don't reduce long-term health care inflation substantially, we can't get control of the deficit.

Sorry Mr. Kotlikoff we are bankrupt and Democrats knew and didn’t care. After all their motto is, “Never let a serious crisis go to waste…it's an opportunity to do things you couldn't do before” – Rohm Emanuel

Yeah like bankrupt America!

California Republican Congressman Bilbray Creates Birth Certificate Controversy

KENYANS IN KISUMU (WESTERN KENYA)CELEBRATE ON NOV. 5,2008 OBAMA'S VICTORY!

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President—Article II Section 1 U.S. Constitution

One of the greatest lessons that I learned from the 2008 presidential elections was that Democrats would rather elect a constitutionally ineligible foreign-born enemy of this country and its constitution rather than elect a Republican. Even if that Republican was a “Republican in name only” and even if that Republican self ascribes himself as a Maverick, which is code for “I screw Republicans over all the time just like you Democrats.”

I fully expect the usual suspects the Lindsey Grahams, the Susan Collins, the Olympia Snows and the Scott Browns to stab Republicans in the front (so often it’s not the back anymore) but what I didn’t expect is someone that I supported and voted for to stab Republicans in the back.

Yet stabbed in the back, is exactly how I felt when I read reported in Worldnetdaily.com that Rep. Brian Bilbray (R-CA) made the claim that there's no need for the president to have been born in the United States – or to have two parents who are U.S. citizens – to be a "natural born citizen" and be eligible for the Oval Office. (see article)

I didn’t believe it. I, I, couldn’t believe it. So I dropped what I was doing logged on to Congressman Bilbray’s website and found his Washington phone number and before I knew it, my fingers were dialing. (Bilbray’s website)

A young man answered the phone and after I identified myself as one of Congressman Bilbray’s constituents, I expressed my consternation about what I read on the WND site. The young man who later identified himself as Joe Williamson (after I asked his name) launched into a run-on sentence defense of the Congressman’s position without so much as taking a breath or letting me get another word in edgewise.

I was told that the Congressman’s office had seen the birth certificate that the State of Hawaii released and that they had seen Congressional record that proved that Barry Hussein Soetoro was a citizen.

After Mr. Williamson concluded his defense, I told him that he had not seen an original birth certificate of Mr. Soetoro. I told him that up until this point, I supported Mr. Bilbray and voted for him but I now was officially withdrawing my support.

Mr. Williamson then volunteered someone who he identified as the person who was actually handling this topic for Mr. Bilbray and asked if I would like to speak with him. I consented and the phone was handed off.

When the next man spoke, I asked to whom I was speaking. He identified himself as Jeff Post. I expressed my dismay to Mr. Post about the article in WND and the conversation that I had just had with Mr. Williamson. Mr. Post who sounded very young (they both sounded twenty-something), I asked his age. Twenty-five he answered. And then Mr. Post began to express the conviction that Mr. Bilbray’s office investigated the birth certificate matter and they had information and thus concluded that the president is a citizen. I told Mr. Post also, that Mr. Bilbray had just lost a supporter and that I would be blogging about our conversation then ended the call.

I sat there for a minute not believing that after two years of investigating this topic myself how a Republican U.S. Congressman and his staff would be so ignorant about the Constitutional requirement to be president of the United States. How could they be so ignorant about the over one million dollar effort of Barry Hussein Soetoro. It was an effort to keep the American people from knowing the truth about his citizenship status.

Below are some but not all of posting that cover two years of investigation of the president’s ineligibility:

Army Officer refuses to show Proof of Birth until CIC shows his

NPR and the Nigerian Observer reported in 2008 Obama Kenyan Born

I am an American I have the right to debate and disagree

Ask and Tell Military Hero Faces Government Wrath

Obama again shows he’s obsessed with “Birthers”

Pelosi is at the center of Obama’s eligibility Question

Na na na na na you have no Standing!

Obama eyes One term rather than release sealed Birth Certificate

Say it Loud, “I’m a Birther and Proud!”

Stupid is as stupid does!

Obama’s Original Birth Certificate has been Destroyed

Why Obama’s Birth Certificate Matters

Obama a One Term President without a Birth Certificate

Great will be the fall of the house of Obama

I have the Right to know if Barack Hussein Obama is Constitutionally eligible to be POTUS

Justice Roberts promised publicly to hear Obama’s eligibility

He’s Doing the Job that the Judiciary and the Legislative Branches wouldn’t do!

The Obama Constitutional Crisis is Here!

Omerica

Once, Twice, Three times a President

And now an Usurper

Obama is investigator, judge and jury; Finds Himself Not Guilty

Schwarzenegger Next?

Scandal plagued Obama should show Birth Certificate and fire Emanuel

December 15, 2008

Conmander-in-Chief

An Obama Presidency a National Security Risk?

Democrats and Obama Knowingly Are Causing Constitutional Crisis for Change

What is most disappointing is one would think that we would not have to explain to a so called Republican why the Birth Certificate matter is so relevant to Americans who value the Constitution. But for the sake of Rep. Bilbray, Mr. Williamson, Mr. Post and all of you that don’t know how important this matter is allow me to explain once again.

The question has to do with Mr. Soetoro’s eligibility to serve as president of the United States. According to the Constitution Mr. Soetoro would have had to be a Natural born citizen not a naturalized citizen. So what does that mean?

Before the Constitution, the closest reference we have to Natural Born Citizen is from the legal treatise “the Law of Nations,” written by Emerich de Vattel in 1758. In book one chapter 19,

§ 212. Of the citizens and natives.

“The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.

The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it.

The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.” (source)

We know by Mr. Soetoro own admission that his father was not a citizen of the United States of America therefore he is a foreigner who owes his allegiance to another country as demonstrated by his constant tampering in Kenya’s (his father’s born country and perhaps his) electoral matters.

WND reported the Obama administration spent $23 million of U.S. taxpayer money to support the "Yes" vote ratifying the new Kenyan constitution, which coincided with Obama's Aug. 4 birthday.-- Jerome R. Corsi

President Soetoro just gifted Kenya 23 million U.S. taxpayers’ dollars, money to affect the outcome of a Kenyan vote. (see story)

Clearly Mr. Soetoro has a dual allegiance that is exactly what the Founding Fathers for over two hundred years where attempting to prevent but just recently have failed due to the Soetoro presidency.

This is explained quite thoroughly by the following post entitled, PROOF – OBAMA’S ACKNOWLEDGED DUAL CITIZENSHIP MEANS NEVER ELIGIBLE TO BE POTUS – INFO ALWAYS IN PLAIN SIGHT –Hillaryandme.com

Also from John M. Yinger’s The Origins and Interpretation of the Presidential Eligibility Clause in the U.S. Constitution: Why Did the Founding Fathers Want the President To Be a "Natural Born Citizen"

Is found two extraordinary reasons why the Constitutional requirement, “Natural Born Citizen” was intended.

1. The John Jay Letter where Mr. Jay wrote, “Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen (emphasis in the original).(5)”
2. Madison's Convention Notes where it is written: the ministers of foreign powers would have and make use of, the opportunity to mix their intrigues & influence with the Election. Limited as the powers of the Executive are, it will be an object of great moment with the great rival powers of Europe who have American possessions, to have at the head of our Governmt a man attached to their respective politics and interests. (source)

Unfortunately it is as the Founders feared. A president who is not a Natural born citizen as president Soetoro, has interest in his homeland as Mr. Soetoro has demonstrated by sending American tax dollars there to affect voting in Kenya’s constitution as I stated above. This dual allegiance is not good for the United States. If we can even say, because there is a question, that this president has allegiance to this country at all.

Here is what we know and is not disputed, president Soetoro’s history; school records, passport and birth certificate all of the information would lift the cloud of suspicion from his presidency are sealed so that Americans cannot see who is really in their House. President Soetoro has spent a small fortune to keep the American people from knowing his secret life.

Finally we have some disloyal and some ignorant politicians on both sides of the aisle who are aiding and abetting this president and his Party’s destruction of the constitution.

Brian Bilbray and his staff fit in that category somewhere, either disloyal to the constitution, ignorant of what the Constitution means or ignorant of the danger that an Usurper poses for this country. Either one of these choices are of no use to the Republican Party at this most crucial time in our history. (see article)

We need real social-fiscal Republicans to replace the Trent Lott, George Bush, John McCain clueless Republicans with Republicans who know how to protect and defend the Constitution and aren’t afraid to do it.

If Bilbray doesn’t correct this PR disaster he should expect no welcoming treatment from citizens who are determined to rid our country of the Soetoros, Pelosis and Reids.

We can and will add Bilbray to that list when we take out the trash in 2012 and 2014!

Austerity Obama Style

King Juan Carlos, Michelle and Sasha Obama

The timing of this lavish European vacation could not have come at a worse moment, when unemployment in America stands at 10 percent, and large numbers of Americans are fighting to survive financially in the wake of the global economic downturn. It sends a message of indifference, even contempt, for the millions of Americans who are struggling just to feed their families on a daily basis and pay the mortgage, while the size of the national debt balloons to Greek-style proportions. -- Nile Gardiner

Are you dreading your personal financial situation? Are you making all of the sacrifices that President Obama and Vice President Biden are calling for but you still feel like you need to get away and clear your head from all of the pressures of no money and possible insolvency? Don’t fret we all have to face hard times together. As president, Barry Hussein Soetoro told us we all have to have some skin in the game.

Michelle Obama and daughter Sasha returned from Spain on Sunday, a vacation at a lavish hotel on the Mediterranean coast that triggered her first controversy since becoming first lady. I'm told she made the trip because she promised one of her closest friends, a longtime Chicago pal who just lost her father, she would spend time with her.—Lynn Sweet (source)

(see 1:02min video)




But you want to take a trip to Spain to take Spanish lessons. Too audacious? What about taking some friends to Spain, you know, to help a fellow grieving friend mourn the recent death of a family member.

Does that still sound somewhat pretentious, well that’s because you don’t think like the president and his wife. To them, in the middle of the greatest depression since the great depression, going on vacation is not out of the question. But not just a vacation, no a 5day $300,000 fully staffed, secret serviced, air force two, 40 person “entouraged” jaunt to Spain and the island of Majorca.

In fact, Michelle Obama will have enjoyed not one, not two but eight vacations by the end of this summer. These include a trip to Los Angeles in June, a visit to the Florida’s oil-hit Gulf Coast next weekend and a ten-day trip to Martha’s Vineyard later this month according to the United Kingdom Online News source, the Mail Online. (source)

According to another U.K. News organization the Telegraph Michele Obama is vacationing lavishly in Europe while the rest of us who have skin in the game, to borrow a term from president Soetoro, are suffering the jobless recovery of the Soetoro administration.

The timing of this lavish European vacation could not have come at a worse moment, when unemployment in America stands at 10 percent, and large numbers of Americans are fighting to survive financially in the wake of the global economic downturn. It sends a message of indifference, even contempt, for the millions of Americans who are struggling just to feed their families on a daily basis and pay the mortgage, while the size of the national debt balloons to Greek-style proportions.-- Nile Gardiner (source)

(see 1:10min)




So while the rest of us who have skin in the game tighten our belts the president and his wife live it up in the White House as if they are King and Queen of America.

Democrat’s Unscrupulous Plan to Demonize Republicans

Portrait of Niccolò Machiavelli by Santi di Tito

Keith Olbermann: So, there are two goals here in the midterms that we’ve been able to identify so far on the part of the Democrats, which is, one, is to equate the Republicans to the Tea Party and to equate there Republicans to the previous Republicans who occupied the White House, which would be Bush.

Howard Dean: Right. Exactly

With all of this contrived talk about Tea Parties and Racism we get an actual look into the soul of Democrat depravity à la Democrat Super partisan Keith Olbermann and Uber-Democrat partisan Howard Dean as they discuss how Democrats plan to wage war against Republicans coming up until this November.

And what do we find? We find that calling the Tea Party Racists is nothing at all but a plot of Democrats to demonize Tea Parties. Since Democrats had such grand success in turning the entire world against George W. Bush, they think that employing the very same strategy will work against everyone that they perceive as an enemy or a threat, i.e. Tea Parties and Republicans.

Keith Olbermann: So, there are two goals here in the midterms that we’ve been able to identify so far on the part of the Democrats, which is, one, is to equate the Republicans to the Tea Party and to equate there Republicans to the previous Republicans who occupied the White House, which would be Bush.

Howard Dean: Right. Exactly

(see 8:32min video)


Charges of Tea Party Racism are phony. The effort to connect Republicans to Bush is a desperate attempt by Democrats to continue deceiving the America people. And the hatred that Democrats contrived against George W. Bush was the epitome of evil. Those who continue to benefit from its residual effects are the embodiment of sheer wickedness and corruption.

Democrats continue to show that they believe that there is no relevance for morality in political affairs. They continue to show that they believe that craft and deceit are justified in pursuing and maintaining political power.

Calling the Tea Party movement Racists, the Bush Bashing and the attempts to link all Republicans with President Bush who they’ve completely demonized Democrats are simply demonstrating Machiavellian traits in their quest to maintain power November 2010.

Remember Democrats will do anything and everything to get what they want. (see :15sec video)



Any characterization of Republicans, Bush or Tea Parties by Democrats should be totally ignored and rebuked as as lies.

Post-Traumatic First African-American President Syndrome?

Unprecedented spending and debt, nonexistent shovel ready jobs, persistent high rates of unemployment, and setbacks on terrorism hardly qualify as achievements.--Mike Bates

Are you highly critical of the president? Do you find that you don’t thank him nearly enough? Are you not giving him the credit that he deserves? Well it just might be that you are suffering from, “POST-TRAUMATIC FIRST AFRICAN-AMERICAN PRESIDENT SYNDROME or PTFAAPS!”

That’s right America, like, who knew that there was such a thing? But apparently, there is, according to Progressives. One progressive in particular coined the term. Liberal commentator and MSNBC contributor Karen Hunter said she is the one who named the disorder.

Apparently, “post-traumatic first African-American president Syndrome” is the diagnosis if we Americans don’t give Barry Hussein Soetoro his props. Progressives are all in a tizzy because they think Soetoro is not getting the credit that they think that he deserves. (see article)

Is this really a problem? Well CBS Harry Smith seemed concerned he even asked Mr. Soetoro if he felt he’s getting the credit that he thinks he deserves. (see: 29sec video)



No, no, no Mr. Soetoro it’s not the economy or your radical progressive agenda, no sir you’re not getting the credit that you think you deserve because Americans are suffering from PTFAAPS, Karen Hunter explains. (see 2:19min video)



See we are all the victims of “post-traumatic first American-American president Syndrome. “ Whew! I’m glad someone cleared that up. I knew something was wrong but I didn’t think it was I, my neighbors or my fellow citizens. I thought it was the lousy way the president and his progressive administration is running the country into the ground.

Unprecedented spending and debt, nonexistent shovel ready jobs, persistent high rates of unemployment, and setbacks on terrorism hardly qualify as achievements.--Mike Bates

After all this administration is spending more money than Americans, who are yet unborn can repay. It getting so bad that Democrats will willingly repeal Roe vs. Wade because we need all the help we can get to pay back this massive debt that the Soetoro administration and Democrats are compiling against future generations of Americans.

Must I mention that it’s coming upon election season? And one strategy that Democrats are considering to help them win in November is keeping everything that they have done in the last 18 months on the down low?

So how will Democrats talk about their many questionable accomplishments over the last 18 months? There is the passage of Healthcare, There was the takeover of AIG, the bailout of Goldman Sachs and banks, there is the 863 billion dollar stimulus vote and there is the takeover of the auto industry. Will Democrats proudly tout all of their “accomplishments” to the American this fall? Or do they have another tactic in mind?—Alaphiah

So I ask you, how does one get the credit that one thinks one deserves Mr. Soetoro if everything that one has done has been against the will of the American people? The American people are so peeved at what your Party has done, forcing your progressive agenda on Americans, that your Party doesn’t even want to talk about what you’ve done in the last 18 months. Not to mention Mr. president that you said that you think you deserve and would give yourself an incomplete for the last 18 months. (Soetoro gives himself an incomplete)

Maybe Mr. president the American people are holding you to your campaign promises that you didn’t keep. (see 1:47min video)



Remember you promised Mr. president the most ethical, most open and transparent presidency in the history of the United States. You promised that every bill would be shown to the American people before you signed it into law. Instead, what we got were empty promises. You passed your health care bill before anyone read it, you and Congress included. In fact, Nancy Pelosi told us that the bill had to be passed before we could know what was in it, of course breaking your campaign promise again. (see :10sec video)



So Mr. president maybe you are getting the credit that you deserve. Mind you, it may not be the credit that you wish or you want, but it is the credit that you deserve.

The Gentleman from New York goes Wild

The Gentleman from New York

Why is that vein popping out from the Gentleman from New York, Representative Anthony Weiner’s head? In a most grandiloquent display in which the Gentleman from New York appeared he was “fit to be tied”, the Gentleman lambasted Republicans on the floor of the House of Representatives for the failure of H.R. 847, the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act to pass. (see 1:52min video)



Those dirty Republicans, right? Well not exactly, upon closer inspection and a little math not so fast Mr. Weiner.

There are presently 433 members in the House of Representatives at the time of this vote. The break down is 255 Democrats in majority and 179 Republicans in the minority with 2 vacancies.

The passage of the bill in question required a 2/3rds majority or 288 yes votes to pass which means that all 255 Democrats would have to vote yes.

In addition, they would also need 33 Republicans to join them. This would be very doable except that among other things Democrats made this 111th Congress a virtual North against the South battleground experience, largely due to their ongoing national efforts to demonize all Republicans.

Instead of creating an atmosphere of mutual respect and diplomacy in the Congress as true leadership would do. Democrats have chosen to foster an “us against them” partisan divide so vast and so full of vitriol that they believe they most excoriate Republicans at every political opportunity, hence the Gentleman from New York’s floor demonstration.

However, here’s the reality of the situation, Democrats did not have 255 Democrats to vote yes on this bill. Four Democrats voted no and Seven Democrats didn’t bother to vote at all. Therefore, only 243 Democrats out of 255 voted for this bill, so not all Democrats agreed with this bill’s passage. What’s more, twelve Republicans did vote yes to pass this bill. (Final vote count)

So once again, the Gentleman from New York attempted to make a partisan war out of something that his own party did not fully support. Why would the Gentleman from New York do such a thing?

Because Anthony Weiner, Mr. and Mrs. U.S. Citizen, is no Gentleman, Anthony Weiner is a Nancy Pelosi partisan who places party, agenda and ideology even above what is good for the United States of America.

You should remember this about Democrats in November!

The Most Constitutional Ignorant president ever in the History of the U.S.

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the Supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.—Article III Section 2, U.S. Constitution

What does president Barry Hussein Soetoro, the Soetoro Justice Department, Judge Susan Bolden and Elena Kagan all have in common? They are all woefully ignorant of the Constitution of the United States of America. Either they are supremely ignorant of the constitution or they are anarchists or both.

The Constitution specifically affirms that if a case is involving a State, that case is to be filed directly in the Supreme Court of the United States of America. You would think that the smartest president in the history of the United States of America and all of the brilliant people that he has surrounded himself with would know this.

On the contrary, this constitutional ignorant administration doesn’t know the first thing about the Constitution it’s like when he was a candidate he didn’t know how many states are in the Union…57 or the additional two that he said his staff didn’t let him go to.

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. —Article III Section 2, U.S. Constitution

The fact is judge Susan Bolden had no standing to adjudicating this matter, one would think she would have known that. The fact is Bolden’s decision in the case; “United States of American vs. State of Arizona; and Janice K. Brewer, Governor of the State of Arizona, in her Official Capacity, CV 10-1413-PHX-SRB” is not worth the paper that it was written on. The fact that the case was filed in the federal district court, the fact that it was heard in the federal district court and the fact that it was decided in the federal district court is all, unconstitutional. Once again confirming that this is the most unconstitutional administration in the history of the United States of America.

One would think that the Clinton appointee, Federal District Judge Susan Bolden would know the law well enough to know that she had no standing to hear this case. If she did not know, Judge Bolden has also shown her ignorance of the constitution. Furthermore, this president touts the fact that he taught Constitutional law, so why didn’t he know the District Court had not standing to hear this case? He too has repeatedly proved that he is woefully ignorant of the constitution.

Finally this constitutionally inept president has nominated, and the Democrat controlled Senate is about to confirm an equally constitutionally ignorant person to be a justice on the Supreme Court, Elena Kagan.

Senator Jeff Sessions explains why no one who values the constitution can vote to confirm Elena Kagan. (see 9:07 min video)





The Barry Hussein Soetoro presidency continues to exhibit a blatant disregard for the constitution. First by not enforcing it, thus consciously allowing, no aiding and abetting, illegal entry into the United States, though they are sworn to enforce the constitution. Secondly, the Soetoro administration disregarded the constitution by working directly against it, i.e. wrongly suing a State in constitutional principle and venue.

First suing a State that is attempting to follow constitutional mandate to protect the United States is wrong. Second for the Soetoro, administration to bring this suit in District Court instead of the Supreme Court was unconstitutional and wrong.

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion—Article III Section IV, U.S. Constitution

The constitution guarantees that the Federal government shall protect the States from invasion. Arizona is clearly being invaded.

Not only is Arizona being invaded the invaders have declared war on Arizona and the United States by placing a one million dollar bounty on a citizen of the United States of America. Due to the invasion of Arizona by illegal aliens and threats of murder against a U.S. citizen, who is a law enforcement agent, by a Mexican Drug Cartel.  Therefore Arizona is within its constitutional rights to engage in war with Mexico.

No State shall…engage in War, unless actually invaded—Article I Section X, U.S. Constitution

I’d say that Democrats, this president, and Democrat appointed judges have some boning up on the constitution to do.

Allow me to make it plain president Soetoro. Your administration has a constitutional responsibility to stop illegal aliens from entering the United States. Your administration has a constitutional responsibility to support Arizona in its efforts to protect America from this Illegal Agent invasion.

Nevertheless, it bears repeating, when the federal government abdicates it’s duties to protect a State from illegal entry and a State is invaded that State has the constitutional authority to engage in war against such invaders.

Not only is Judge Susan Bolden’s decision to interfere with Arizona’s illegal alien law unconstitutional, she has no standing in this matter, and therefore her decision is invalid. there is nothing preventing Arizona from enacting Arizona SB1070 in full Governor Brewer should.

If Arizona enacted SB1070 fully, over judge Bolden’s decision they would by completely within their constitutional rights to do so. Just think that would be such a teachable moment for the constitutional ignorant Barry Hussein Soetoro, the Soetoro administration and Judge Susan Bolden.

Shame on the lot of you, Mr. Soetoro because such ignorance of the law and constitution is no excuse!

Don’t Talk about it! Democrat November Deception

They are the masters of deception, political schemers. They are Machiavellian in word and deed. They are Democrats. And now that they must face the electorate this November to account for what they’ve done because they are in sole control of the Executive Branch, in majority control of the Legislative Branch and they benefit from a Left lending Judicial Branch. What is new is they have no Bush to hide behind, for the first time in years Democrats will give an account for their ideologies, their political philosophies and their deeds.

Yes, all unscrupulous things of Democrat past were hidden behind a wall of blame Bush until now. And now that there are no more plausible Bush excuses it is interesting to see Democrats flail about looking for a new Bush scapegoat and sometimes that scapegoat has been you and me, the American people.

So how will Democrats talk about their many questionable accomplishments over the last 18 months? There is the passage of Healthcare, There was the takeover of AIG, the bailout of Goldman Sachs and banks, there is the 863 billion dollar stimulus vote and there is the takeover of the auto industry. Will Democrats proudly tout all of their “accomplishments” to the American this fall? Or do they have another tactic in mind?

I have an idea, Democrats can always use the “Bush made us do it,” excuse. Oh wait a moment; they’re already using that excuse. William McGurn of the Opinion Journal discusses the Democrats' deception strategy for the 2010 fall elections. (see 4:51min video)





Shame, is that it? Democrats are not going to talk about all of the legislation that they’ve been a part of because they are ashamed of what they have done. Imagine that!

You mean, all of the spending, all of the partisan politicking and all of the forcing through their agenda, and Democrats are ashamed of it all.

They would rather not talk about it. Imagine that.

Illegal Alien protesters celebrate “Down with America” in Obama’s Post-Constitutional America

America is no longer what it could be, what it once was and I say to myself I don’t want that future for my children—Barry Hussein Soetoro

The men who envisioned, planned and fought for the creation of the United States of America where and rightly are called Founding Fathers.

Therefore, the man who is presiding over America’s demise or America’s failing in Post-Constitutional America should equally be called a Failing Father of America. Barry Hussein Soetoro is a Failing Father of America. (see :39sec video)




Yes President Soetoro, we can all feel it. America is no longer what it could be; America is no longer what it once was. We all know that we are not better off than we were 5-years ago. We know we’re not better off now than we were when Bush was President. We know that we are worst, much worst.

For example, there are Mexican flags waving in the streets of Arizona, no longer attempting to hide the Mexican invasion of America. These thronging crowds in Phoenix are celebrating the decision of Judge Susan Bolden to allow illegality to become de facto legal. Judge Bolden’s decision represents the demise of a country, the country, the United States of America. (see 3:39min video)




Agents of foreign powers protesting in the streets of America like we see in Phoenix Arizona would have never been tolerated in the Constitutional America but in the Post-Constitutional America and under the Failing Father Barry Hussein Soetoro this is not only permitted but it is encouraged by actions of the administration.

The United States of America is “no longer what it could be, what it once was” to borrow a phrase from the Failing Father of America, Barry Hussein Soetoro.

President Soetoro is presiding over the failing of America though he is not the first president to do so. Every president since William Jefferson Clinton has done so, however, Soetoro is the first President that has pursued the failing of America with such abandon that the American people have finally awaken to the reality that America is on a head first downward spiral.

Americans now realize that America has been toppled off of its perch of Exceptionalism and is headed downward to the ash heap of ordinary third world country status via jobs and industry outsourcing and via illegal alien (cheap labor) invasion.

[T]his "brief moment in history" when the US had pre-eminent military, economic and political power, would not last.

"This is just a period, a few decades this will last, and I think that all of us who are Americans should think about this and ask ourselves how do we wish this moment to be judged 50 years from now," --Former President William Jefferson Clinton (source)

William Jefferson Clinton warned us in 2002 while he was speaking in Australia that this day would come and come it has. It is well documented that Clinton attempted to hasten the day of equalizing world power by giving U.S. secrets to China. So it should be no surprise that China is positioned to overtake American as the pre-eminent military, economic and political power in the world.

If Clinton lessened the military power of the United States Barry Hussein Soetoro is finishing the job by lessening U.S. economic and political powers.

You know about the in-your-face socialization of the U.S. Health care industry, you know about the government takeover of the auto industry but what you are probably less informed about is the de facto changing of the Constitution by non-enforcement and the disregarding of its laws.

One such proof is a memo from the Soetoro administration’s Department of Homeland Security, Immigration section where the Soetoro administration is plotting to grant amnesty to all 20 million illegal aliens in the United States by by-passing the United States Senate.

USCIS memo, drafted by Chief of Policy and Strategy for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Denise Vanison, outlines 18 different ways for the Obama Administration to essentially eliminate our borders through regulatory fiat in clear violation of the letter and the spirit of U.S. immigration laws. (NumbersUSA)(see memo below)


Executive Memo

This is a fundamental change to the way we do things in America. In America we have a Congress that is the legislative branch of a tri-part form of government. The Founding Fathers meant to keep any of the other parts of government from acting outside of its constitutional powers.

What is so ironic about this memo is that it violates the principles that the Soetoro administration set forth in their court arguments against Arizona SB1070. The administration argued and the Judge Susan Bolden agreed that if Arizona SB1070 was enacted fully it would be doing a job that the federal government should be doing.

Likewise if the Soetoro administration enacts amnesty for 40million illegal aliens and their families by Executive fiat, then the Executive would be doing the job of the Legislative branch. This is clearly un-Constitutional.

What the American people are slowly beginning to recognize via the “Soetoro birth certificate” controversy is there is no one in America that has the “standing” to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States according to Federal Judges. No one!

Let me say this again, there is no one in America that can protect and defend the Constitution if the Executive Branch of the United States of America decides to change the constitution by non-enforcement or by simply disregarding the constitution if the other branches turn a blind eye to the developing tyranny that we are seeing in the Soetoro administration.

Therefore the Failing Father of the United States of America Barry Hussein Soetoro is presiding over the Post-Constitutional demise of the United States.

America is failing. No American has standing to protect or defend the Constitution.

SHE’S DANGEROUS!

The dangerous legal progressive activist legislator,if she’s nominated to bench, Elena Kagan

I don’t think the America people are going to hold harmless those who vote to impose a legal progressive activist legislator from the bench upon them.—Sen. Jeff Sessions

On the floor of the Senator Jeff Sessions in no uncertain terms warned his fellow Senators what the ramifications to the United States will be if Elena Kagan is confirmed to the Supreme Court.

For all of the Lindsey Graham Republicans who will vote for Kagan to go along to get along with Democrats you have no excuse, you have been warned right there on the Senate floor. You will not be able to say you didn’t know when your term approaches and you have to face the American people. See Sen. Sessions warning. (see 3:21min video)

A Progressive in the mould of Obama himself—Greg Craig former Counsel to president Barack Obama commenting on Elena Kagan

As Sen. Sessions forewarning goes out to everyone who will listen Elena Kagan is, “a dangerous Progressive Political…Nominee.”

Republicans who love this country and who love the Constitution shouldn’t vote for her. But neither should Democrats.

Clinton Appointee disregards law and Constitution in support of meritless government arguments

Clinton Appointed Susan Bolton

"There is a substantial likelihood that officers will wrongfully arrest legal resident aliens under the new (law), by enforcing this statute, Arizona would impose a 'distinct, unusual and extraordinary' burden on legal resident aliens that only the federal government has the authority to impose."— U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton

The argument is this, If the Federal government abdicates it’s Constitutional duties (which it has) which are to protect American borders and protect the American people, is a State within the Constitution if that State enforces Constitutional laws that the Federal government refuses to enforce?

Clinton appointee Judge Susan Bolton is symptomatic of everything that is wrong with America. She has made herself complicit in the Federal government’s violation of the Constitution of the United States of America. We are no longer a nation of laws; we are now, a nation of progressive judicial rulings.(see article)

Judge Bolden did not rule on the facts of Arizona’s immigration case nor did she rule on the law. Instead Judge Bolton ruled on the nonsensical “what if” arguments that the Barry Hussein Soetoro administration have been floating in the Progressive Leftwing Media. (Complaint)(Response)(Decision)

The Soetoro administration mischaracterized this case as a civil rights issue instead of the National security or National sovereignty issue that it is. And judge Bolton foolishly bought these unreasonable arguments instead of applying the law. This is exactly the danger of an Elena Kagan and a Sonia Sotomayor on the U.S. Supreme Court because this is exactly what they will do.

The Soetoro administration argued “what if” resident aliens or even Mexican Americans are stopped and asked about their citizenship wouldn’t that be a violation of their civil rights? They also argued, “what if“ there is racial profiling would that be a violation of civil rights?

The Soetoro administration argued for the court to accept that there might be instances of civil rights violations, if Arizona police in the normal conduct of their duties ask someone in a lawful contact to show some identification. Judge Susan Bolton did.

The answers to these “what if” arguments where so simple that even a Federal judge couldn’t mess up a decision on the facts, until of course Judge Susan Bolton did. It is clear now that her apparent inability to adjudicate unbiasly and logically is probably why this Clinton appointee was selected to hear this case.

That notwithstanding, the answers are, one: we are all subject to being stopped and asked for identification. There is no undue civil rights burden placed on anyone asked to produce identification in this manner. As citizens, we carry identification with us at all times. Two, the Arizona law is explicitly written specifically to prevent and discourage racial profiling. Racial profiling is a politically correct trumped up non sequitur meant to cloud the debate and divide the America people by the Left.

Look every time you and I are stopped by the police we are asked for identification, but according to Judge Bolton’s ruling illegal aliens are now a special protected class complete with special rights, they cannot be asked the question that hundreds of thousands of Americans are asked every day, “May I see some identification.” Below are provisions of Arizona’s 1070 bill that Judge Bolton blocked.

Key parts of Senate Bill 1070 that will not go into effect Thursday:

• The portion of the law that requires an officer make a reasonable attempt to determine the immigration status of a person stopped, detained or arrested if there's reasonable suspicion they're in the country illegally.
• The portion that creates a crime of failure to apply for or carry "alien-registration papers."
• The portion that makes it a crime for illegal immigrants to solicit, apply for or perform work. (This does not include the section on day laborers.)
• The portion that allows for a warrantless arrest of a person where there is probable cause to believe they have committed a public offense that makes them removable from the United States.

Andy McCarthy said that this decision is "nuts"

The judge, however, twisted to concept of federal law into federal enforcement practices (or, as it happens, lack thereof). In effect, the court is saying that if the feds refuse to enforce the law the states can't do it either because doing so would transgress the federal policy of non-enforcement ... which is nuts.

The judge also employs a cute bit of sleight-of-hand. She repeatedly invokes a 1941 case, Hines v. Davidowitz, in which the Supreme Court struck down a state alien-registration statute. In Hines, the high court reasoned that the federal government had traditionally followed a policy of not treating aliens as "a thing apart," and that Congress had therefore "manifested a purpose ... to protect the liberties of law-abiding aliens through one uniform national system" that would not unduly subject them to "inquisitorial practices and police surveillance." But the Arizona law is not directed at law-abiding aliens in order to identify them as foreigners and subject them, on that basis, to police attention. It is directed at arrested aliens who are in custody because they have violated the law. --Andy McCarthy (source)

Judge Bolton has done irreparable harm to the integrity and independence of all U.S. jurisprudence. Her ruling is further confirmation of the corruption of Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of the U.S. government.

It is apparent to everyone except the Radical Progressives and Judge Susan Bolton, that the Federal Government is engaged complicatedly with the enemies of the United States to fundamentally change this country. Change it from a country based on the principles of the Constitution and the Founding Fathers into a nation that no longer is a nation of laws but a nation of progressive judicial rulings.