Pelosi says use your imagination to get gas and oil

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi

STEPHANOPOULOS: But why not allow votes on all that? When you came in as Speaker you promised in your commitment book "A New Direction for America," let me show our viewers, you said that “Bills should generally come to the floor under a procedure that allows open, full, fair debate consisting of full amendment process that grants the Minority the right to offer its alternatives.” If they want to offer a drilling proposal, why can't they have a vote?

PELOSI: They'll have to use their imagination as to how they can get a vote and then they may get a vote. –NewsBusters, transcript of Interview on “this week”

One question very simply posed by former Clinton White house aide and now “This week” news show host George Stephanopoulos to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi last Sunday on "this week."

If Mr. Stephanopoulos ask this question once he asked it a million times, Speaker Pelosi if you are right why don’t you allow a straight up or down vote in Congress on drilling oil as the American people want.

Mr. Stephanopoulos even showed the Speaker of the House her own words where she said that under her leadership the House would be run ethically and fairer than under Republican control prior to 2006.

A New Direct for America

Regular order for legislation

Bills should generally come to the floor under a procedure that allows open, full and fair debate consisting of a full amendment process that grants the Minority the right to offer its alternatives, including a substitute.--Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (See document)(See video about 8mins)

Clearly if the Congresswoman’s position was correct surely that would be born out by a Democrat majority House of Representatives would show the American people’s interest.

So why won’t the Speaker of the House allow a vote on whether America should be able to drill for oil in America to decrease American dependency on foreign oil?

Congresswoman Pelosi’s answers were insultingly stupefying and opaquely serpentine even for a Democrat. And like a political Fairy Godmother she pronounced, "They'll have to use their imagination as to how they can get a vote and then they may get a vote."

Then continuing in typically Democrat fare the Congresswoman blamed President Bush as the reason that she did not allow a vote for drilling for oil. Ridiculous! (See video about 7mins)



It is a further insult to the American people’s intelligence that 7 years of Democrats attempts to sabotage the Bush administration and Republicans at the risk of losing the Iraq war thereby making the world less safe could be understood in any way that what Democrats were really attempting to accomplish was to save the planet and make the world safer.

Congresswoman Pelosi and the Democrat majority should be ashamed of themselves and they should rush back to Congress and do their jobs like the Republicans who are fighting for the American people.

Something to think about in November I must say!

Yet More Deception from Pelosi!

The 'Politico' reports that Nancy Pelosi is
secretly advising Democratic Congressmen, who
are coming up for re-election, to "support"
off-shore drilling, if it will get them elected.

I guess she figures if she can keep the Democratic
majority in both houses of Congress, they will be
free to continue doing exactly as they please and
"screw you"!

NICE Nancy!!!!!!!............. lie to the people
again. You got some sweetheart deal there. Tell
the people what they want to hear, and slam it to
them later........... as you did with Election '06.

Anybody who votes these lying, good-for-nothing
maggots back into office this year, is a fool at
best. It's as though you are telling them that
"it hurts".......... but, "do it again, I like it"!

It depends on what ready is

President Bill Clinton

Bill Clinton regrets some things he said - and didn't say - on the campaign trail. But one thing he still can't bring himself to utter: Barack Obama is ready to be President.-- MICHAEL McAULIFF, DAILY NEWS

"You can argue that nobody is ready to be president. You can argue that even if you've been vice-president for eight years, that no one can be fully ready for the pressures of the office." —Former President William Jefferson Clinton

When asked point blank just days ago whether or not Democrat presumptive nominee and Senator Barack Obama was ready to be the President of the United States of America, former President Bill Clinton answered in his own erstwhile yet indomitable, that depends on what is, is, fashion. (see story) (Play video)



The former President said, “You can argue that nobody is ready to be president.” The former President when on to say that he felt that Obama would beat McCain.

So let me see if I understand this, the Democrat Party is willing to put forward candidates (Hillary Clinton included) who are not ready to be President thinking number one that the American people are stupid enough to elect them (which was disproved in the Democrat primary) and number two Democrats don’t have to believe in the credentials of their candidates they only want to win.

Yesterday was the third day that House Republicans called the nation’s attention to the fact that Democrats in control of Congress have been a political disaster and that Nancy Pelosi and her Democrat Majority would rather be vacationing rather than voting on a resolution for the oil crisis in America. (See story)

And now Bill Clinton can’t quite bring himself to answer a simple yes or no question about the quality and readiness of the candidate that the Democrats have all but chosen to be their nominee to be President.

I guess you can argue that no Democrat should be elected to office locally or nationally but I guess that doesn’t matter because apparently what matters to Democrats is only that they win no matter what they promise. Like in the 2006 elections when they promised a new direction and all we got was partisan warfare from Democrat which caused legislative gridlock and more of the same politics.

Now they have put forward a candidate that promises new hope and change, the only thing is he’s not qualified to produce either!

Not one honest Democrat, if you can find such a thing, is willing to say that Sen. Barack Obama is ready to be President of the United States of America. But you can find plenty who says that he’s not. (play video)



If the Democrat’s greatest icon of the twentieth century William Jefferson Clinton can’t bring himself to say that Senator Obama is ready to be President why do Democrats think that they have any chance with Independents and Republicans? And they need crossover from both to win this election.

Only the rabid ultra partisans who value Party over country will vote for Barack. Only the ignorant who are enthralled with the idea of , “The first Black President” will vote for Barack. Only the enemies of America who want change, they want to see America changed and unmoored from the traditions that once made this country uniquely great, will vote for Barack.

Will Bill Clinton vote for Barack Obama?

Yes, because Bill Clinton is all of the above. In President Clinton’s own words, “The Constitution sets qualifications for the president, and then the people decide who they think would be the better president. I think we have two choices. I think he [Obama] should win, and I think he will win.”

That classic Clinton nondirect response was to the question, “Do you think that he[Sen. Obama] is qualified?” Not exactly a ringing endorsement of the man who potentially could lead your country but it’ll have to do because to anyone on knows how to interpret Clintonese the President’s answer was NO! No, Barack Hussein Obama is not ready and he is not qualified but Democrats have to win.

That my friend was Clinton’s true response layered underneath all of his pretense.

Depending of course on what is, is!

Pelosi’s on Vacation: Republicans working for the People

Leader of the Democrat controlled House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi

While their colleagues returned home for vacation, a small group of conservative Republicans took to the House floor Monday to protest Speaker Nancy Pelosi's refusal to hold a vote on offshore oil drilling.-- JOHN RILEY / The Dallas Morning News (See story)

Its lights out in the U.S. House of Representatives because the Democrat lead Congress is on a 5 week vacation.

However not everyone has gone home. There are some who feel a sense of duty to the American people. These few would be Republicans who knowing the dire need to relieve the American People at the gas pump have decided to stay and fight on behalf of the American people.

With no C-Span cameras to record the Republican protest against Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s shut down, House Republicans have resorted to hall way interviews to bring attention to the fact that the Democrat leadership in Congress left Washington D.C. leaving the people’s business undone. (see video about 8mins)



Republicans have vowed to keep their protest up on behalf of the American people until Democrats return to Congress and complete the unfinished work that their job requires.

The more things change the more they remain the same

Democrats making a stink that Iraqi government took vacation in 2007

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and the Democrats adjourned the House and turned off the light and killed the microphones, but Republicans are still on the floor talking gas prices.

Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) and other GOP leaders opposed the motion to adjourn the House, arguing that Pelosi's refusal to schedule a vote allowing offshore drilling is hurting the American economy.

They have refused to leave the floor after the adjournment motion passed at 11:23 a.m. and are busy bashing Pelosi and her fellow Democrats for leaving town for the August recess.—CBS News as reported by The Politico 2008(See here)

Lawmakers divided over whether to keep U.S. troops in Iraq are finding common ground on at least one topic: They are furious that Iraqi politicians are considering a lengthy break this summer.—Associated Press 2007

May 3, 2007 Democrats blasted the Bush Administration and the Iraqi parliament because the Iraqi parliament voted to take a summer break even as U.S. troops fought in the desert heat in Iraq.(See here)

Democrats said that while American soldiers were suffering in the desert heat fighting for freedom in Iraq it was unacceptable for the Iraqi parliament to vacation.

However, how quickly events can change in a year’s time. Sectarian violence is down in Iraq and Shia government and Sunni militia are joining U.S. efforts in defeating insurgent al Qaeda in Iraq. In addition to those things, the U.S. led surge is working and has brought defeat to al Qaeda and stability to the region even if the presumptive Democrat nominee can not admit it!

Now amid record gas prices and Americans facing economic hardships our Congress has voted to go on vacation leaving an all important vote to drill for oil abandoned by this historically low single digit voter approval rated Democrat led, “Do nothing Congress.”



Ironically it was Republicans who attempted to force the Congressional Democrats to do the right thing and vote for the people’s interests but instead Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi turned off the lights, C-Span cameras, adjourned and left the Republicans in the dark to vainly fight for the rights of the people. (See here)

Apparently this is the change that the Democrats promised the American people. In one years time Democrats criticized the Iraqi parliament for taking a vacation while America soldiers suffered, only to turn around in a year’s time and do absolutely nothing to fulfill 2006 campaign promises to change America and work for the people.

Instead on some of the most important issues of the day, energy and oil prices, Democrats adjourn to leave the American people suffering in spite of the fact that Democrats could have remained and fought for the people as a few Republicans attempted to do.

The more things change the more they remain the same. Apparently America that’s the only change that you can believe in coming from a Democrat!

The Dems Trip Out (UP)!

Well, my friends. It's time to thank all those who
voted the "do-nothing" Democrats into control of
Congress in '06. I would like to say that you got
what you deserve, but unfortunately, it affects the
rest of us too!

Whatever made you think, with their past miserable
record, that any of those pie-in-the-sky promises that
they made to you prior to the 2006 elections, would ever
be kept. They did their best to smear the Republicans,
and then they come into power and thumb their noses at
all of us.

Now........... to add insult to injury, they leave on
vacation (5 weeks yet), and tell us all to buzz off.
Of course, they don't have to worry about the cost of
gasoline or any other costs, since they are pretty well
taken care of, BY US, with great salaries, awesome health
benefits (the best that our money can buy), very generous
penisons (even better than Wall Street), and all the graft
they can take!

I am more than pissed at these gross animals. They lie
through their teeth, and turn out to be 100 TIMES WORSE
than the representatives we had before election day '06.
They NEVER represent us the way we want them to, as
demostrated very strongly by their refusal to even vote
on lifting the offshore drilling ban. It's as though
they are telling us, "you put us in control, so shut the
hell up!".

If they think that "more air in your car's tires, conservation,
wind power, solar power, and biofuels......... are going
to cure this country's energy problems....... they are far
more naive than I ever gave them credit for.

ALL those ideas are light years away from being practical,
and even making a dent in our problems. They claim that
lifting the offshore drilling ban will not help bring down
the cost of oil for about ten years. But experts in the
field say that if we tap where we KNOW there is oil, we can
start benefiting in as little as ONE year. Who knows
better.......the oil wildcats or the Congress. I will grant
that the Congress has the edge on wind power, but that is all.

Fellow voters......... REMEMBER THIS TRECHERY come election
day........ and throw the bums out. Keep throwing them out
unless they vote the way we want them too. They are supposed
to be OUR representatives, not the lobbies that throw millions
into their re-election campaigns.

You can check their voting records online. Go, and anybody
who isn't in your corner, VOTE AGAINST. Start with Menendez
in New Jersey.......... for trying to destroy the Immigration
Bill........... he hasn't listened to ONE WORD from any of us.

Obama Launches Preemptive Racist Strike

Sens. McCain and Obama: Not campaigning in perfect Harmony

Launching a Preemptive Racist Strike against Republicans the presumptuous presumptive Democrat nominee Barack Hussein Obama attempted to scare his audience with a tale of Republican racism by using racism of his own to do it! (See here)

Obama said, "[…] So what they're going to try to do is make you scared of me, You know, he's not patriotic enough, he's got a funny name, you know, he doesn't look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills."

That’s an outlandish political charge. The last I checked Sen. McCain has affirmed to wage a respectful campaign to the chagrin of may Republicans. (See here)

This is not the first time Sen. Obama has invoked this racist dialogue into the campaign. He originally projected racism onto Republicans June 2008 And in his Berlin speech before 200,000 people of Germany the Senator began by saying, “I know that I don’t look like the Americans who’ve previously spoken in this great city.

The journey that led me here is improbable. My mother was born in the heartland of America , but my father grew up herding goats in Kenya . His father – my grandfather – was a cook, a domestic servant to the British. “ (Speech Transcript)

It seems to me that Sen. Obama has racism on his mind and that he is attempting to project onto the Republicans his own inadequacies.

After all Sen. Obama did attend the Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s Black Liberation Theology Church for many, many years and raised his family in that anti-White atmosphere where anti-White and anti-American messages were normally spoken. (See related Fox news discussion below)




In addition to that how ironic that Sen. Obama’s own Party, the Democrat Party used race against him when Sen. Hillary Clinton her husband and surrogates all attempted to defeat Obama by scaring Democrats regarding Sen. Obama’s race in their Democrat primaries. (See here)and (here)

Using sex, race against each other

At the same time, each has used the issue against the other. Mr. Obama’s advisers suggested that Mrs. Clinton was playing the sex card last fall after a brutal debate where several male contenders criticized her.

Mrs. Clinton’s advisers and former President Bill Clinton suggested that black candidates like Mr. Obama had done well in South Carolina because of support among African-Americans there.

For Sen. Obama to continually attempt to invoke Racism where it isn’t is a slap in the face of every American. First look to your own Party Sen. Obama. People of the world look at the Democrat Party they are the new purveyors of Racism and they are using a Black candidate to promote it.

Sen. Obama it is time that you face the reality that you and your Party are the only ones stuck on Race and when you lose in November as Sen. Clinton said you will, (She told Gov. Bill Richards that you can’t win) it will not be because you are an inadequate Black male as Senator Clinton supporter Harriet Christian says.

No instead, you will lose because you are an inadequate Democrat candidate. One in a long line of inadequate Democrats who have attempted to became President of the United States of America but have failed.

You can’t blame Republicans for your inadequacies, neither should you attempt self-filing racist prophesies.

The only racism evident so far is not coming from John McCain, or the Republicans. The only racism thus far has emanated from you Senator Obama and the Democrat Party.

Following is Keith Olbermann’s commentary on the Democrat Party’s overt Racism following years of Geraldine Ferraro's racist comments. It seems to me Sen. Obama Democrats are the racist, yourself included.

The Candidate Formerly Known As Senator Barack Hussein Obama

The Symbol of the Artist Formerly Known as Prince who is now again Known as Prince

"I have become a symbol of the possibility of America returning to our best traditions" –Barack Obama

Just back from his European “I’m already the President of the United States” Tour, the Democratic candidate Senator Barack Hussein Obama announced in a closed door meeting of Democrats Tuesday that he has, “become a symbol of the possibility of America returning to our best traditions,” the candidate spoke this apparently still basking in the afterglow of his European Presidential pre-victory lap. (See story)

So in honor of President Obama’s announcement I shall refer to the great one as simply “Symbol” or “the candidate formerly known as Barack Hussein Obama” (TCFKABHO).

Not since John Lennon announced that the Beatles were more popular than Jesus Christ has a World personality felt more important.

And he should, It’s not every day that one has the ability to speak to the people of the world all at the same time as “Symbol” did last Thursday in Germany where he called for the world to come together as one under his 8 to 10 year term as President.

"the objective of this trip was to have substantive discussions with people like President Karzai or Prime Minister Maliki or President Sarkozy or others who I expect to be dealing with over the next eight to 10 years.—Symbol, the candidate formerly known as Barack Hussein Obama (See here)

Below is Symbol with his new symbol . Might look nice with a new and improved White house painted Black as Symbol’s favorite rapper Ludacris suggests in his new Obama rap.


“paint the White House black and I’m sure that’s got ‘em terrified”—Ludacris, from the new Obama rap, “Obama is Here” (See video below)



Yo America! Symbol is here and you know that! (Eat your heart out Obama girl!)

57 and One Left to Go

Sen. Barack Obama: Is he a stealth Socialist?

It is wonderful to be back in Oregon . Over the last 15 months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States . I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go. Alaska and Hawaii , I was not allowed to go to even though I really wanted to visit, but my staff would not justify it."—Democrat presumptive Nominee for President of the United States of America Barack Obama

Nothing else captures the essence of Barack Obama, I think, better than his remark on the campaign trail in Oregon a few months back where the junior Senator from the land of Lincoln added seven to eight states to the United States of America. Now that’s real change!

Whether you consider what the senator said a mistake or a gaffe the more important question is how does a person with degrees from Columbia and Harvard Law School, and who is campaigning to become President of the United States not know something as fundamental as there are 50 states in the United States of America?

He’s a U.S. Senator for gosh sakes, is there not a handbook that they give out to new Senators that explains that each state has two senators which represents them and that there are a total of 100 senators?

Senator Obama’s apparent and stunning ignorance of the workings of his own country notwithstanding the Senator shows an equally startling revisionist attitude considering world history as displayed in his speech in Berlin last Thursday according to author and talk show host Dennis Prager as Mr. Prager’s, appraisal of “Obama’s naïve Berlin Speech” indicates. (See here)

To better understand Sen. Barack Obama, his speech before 200,000 Germans in Berlin is one good place to start. As we shall see, however, it does not leave one secure as to the senator's understanding of history, of America's role in the world, and what to do about evil, among other important issues.—Dennis Prager

Opinion Editorialist William Kristol’s “The Mask Slips” critiques Sen. Obama’s Marxist roots by education and association. (See here) Which makes one speculate whether going to Germany was more of an ideological home coming for Sen. Obama rather than the innocent but politically symbolic historic photo op that mass media reported the trip to be.

My occasion for spending a little time once again with the [book written by] old Communist [Karl Marx] was Barack Obama’s now-famous comment at an April 6 San Francisco fund-raiser. Obama was explaining his trouble winning over small-town, working-class voters: “It’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”—William Kristol

Finally Investor’s Business Daily warns America that Sen. Obama is a stealth Socialist who is attempting to beguile America with euphemisms and codified language to cloak the real intent of his agenda, which is to fundamentally change America’s social economic structure to that of Socialism. (See here)

[Sen. Obama’s phase]"Economic justice" simply means punishing the successful and redistributing their wealth by government fiat. It's a euphemism for socialism.—Investor’s Business Daily

Sen. Obama’s plan seems to be targeting people like him, who believe that America has 57 states and One to go…Hum that would be Liberals in the Democrat Party and their far left moveon.org netroots counterparts.

Obama’s plan to focus on those who are ignorant regarding American and World history seems to be working. Thank God we aren’t all Liberals!

Socialist of the World This is Your Moment

Barack Obama waves to the crowd after speaking in Berlin on Thursday.
" The walls between old allies on either side of the Atlantic cannot stand. The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes; natives and immigrants; Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down."—Sen. Barack Hussein Obama

Socialism
1. Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.
2. The stage in Marxist-Leninist theory intermediate between capitalism and communism, in which collective ownership of the economy under the dictatorship of the proletariat has not yet been successfully achieved.Dictionary.com

Now that we’ve all had time to digest what we saw in the last couple of days on President Obama’s world tour and now that Sen. Obama is safely back home convening his economic team like he really were the President he pretended to be in the Middle East and Europe I think this is a good time to analyze what we saw last Thursday in front of the Victory Column (Siegessaeule) in Berlin, Germany.

What we saw was not a speech in the American tradition of John F. Kennedy or Ronald Reagan even though the symbolism was meant to suggest to your mind that it was. No what we saw standing in front of the German people and calling out to the People of the world was more in line with Karl Marx and Vladimir Illich Ulyanov or Vladimir Lenin as you’ve heard of him.

Like a long lost wayward child the American leftist socialist movement lead by the Democrat presumptive nominee Sen. Barack Obama was accepted back home and embraced in its mother’s arms.

The acceptance that the Democrat’s presumptive nominee received in Europe therefore was symbolically the American socialist movement, in it’s present form the Democrat Party, connecting with its mother movement, the socialists movement of Europe ergo Sen. Obama’s, “People of the world.” The circle has been complete.

The struggle between the ideologies, the American socio-economic model and the European socialist model is obviously over and the European socialist model has won.

Sen. Obama’s call to his fellow socialists worldwide was a call which we will soon see manifested in America and after that happens, if Sen. Obama is elected to be President of the United States, we shall became the United Socialist States of America in a World governed by World socialist of Europe delivered into their hands of course by the American Socialist Barack Hussein Obama and the Democrat Party.

As Sen. Obama said, “People of the world look at Berlin,” because that is exactly where we are headed if Barack Obama is elected President.

You did want change didn’t you? This change will supersede the United States Constitution with the more progressive United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (See here) That’s only because American laws and America’s justice system are so passé now days, wouldn’t you say? All of the progressive justices know that European law is better than American law just ask Justice Anthony Kennedy and Justice Stephen Breyer

America will become just another socialist state of the world in addition to that her people will be asked to pay for all of the ills of the world, global warming and of course Sen. Obama’s Global Poverty Act.

That act could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States that’s American taxpayers’ money to fund the Senator’s world socialist dreams that is why I call this hard move to the left a socialist movement and if Barack Obama is elected I fear this will only be the beginning.

[The]bill called the "Global Poverty Act," sponsored by Democratic Senator Barack Obama, was quickly passed by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday and could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States… the major media's cover-up of the bill, which makes levels of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations, demonstrates the media's desire to see Senator Obama elected to the presidency. –Accuracy in Media

Obama is popular in Europe because he represents the leftist socialist movement that Europeans have embraced for decades and they are only too happy to see the United States has finally acquiesced to it.

Have we? Only you can decide that.

Obama Slaps America in the Face Amid World Tour

Sen. Obama in front of Number 10 Downing Street

Katie Couric revealed an Obama slap in America’s face, it’s hard to believe but she has! Of all people who would have guessed that Couric would uncover a greater controversy than the Rev. Jeremiah Wright controversy right in the middle of the Obama, “I’m the inevitable President of the United States” world tour? (See video)




Sitting down with Sen. Obama in Ammon, Jordan just after he had visited Iraq and Afghanistan Couric could not get Sen. Obama to admit that the surge was primarily responsible and that the surge was the catalyst for political and military improvements in Iraq or that it was America’s victories in Iraq which made his world tour possible.

Obama instead attempted to credit only the Iraqi efforts; the Sunni fight against al Qaeda and the Shia government’s fight against al Qaeda, however, both would not have been possible without America’s resolve to stay in Iraq when Democrats, Sen. Obama included, insisted that America should leave Iraq or cut and run because the Iraq war could not be won and was in fact already lost.

In contrast Couric’s interview with Sen. McCain set a different tone on the success in Iraq. Sen. McCain on the other hand credits the American effort for the success that we presently see in Iraq.

Ms. Couric also showed statistics that bear out the fact that it was indeed the America surge that was primarily responsible for the turn around in Iraq.

Why couldn’t Sen. Obama just be honest and admit to Ms. Couric what she, and what we, already know?

Because Sen. Obama is tied to a radical leftist agenda which prevents acknowledging the truth and if that truth is positive and if that truth credits America or Republicans Sen. Obama nor any other partisan Democrat will acknowledge America’s or Republican success.

In fact Sen. Obama feels more comfortable speaking before the world as he did in Germany and fault America for past deed that Socialist throughout the world object to, even if those deeds lead to freedom and prosperity for the world.

To see just how reticent and resistance to speaking the truth Sen. Obama is I’ve posted the full interview with Katie Couric. You can see for yourself the Democrat tactic of only speak negative about Republicans, President Bush and the war in Iraq as employed by Sen. Obama and by doing so Sen. Obama’s unintentional slight of America in general.

Nevertheless, it is a slight and a startling revelation of the hyper-partisanship of Democrats and proof that Sen. Obama is the same old divisive politician that Democrats have tended to set forth in the last two Presidential elections. (See video about 23mins)

Can a Citizen of the World lead America?

U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama waves to the crowd after making a speech in front of the Victory Column (Siegessaeule) in Berlin July 24, 2008.

"Tonight, I speak to you not as a candidate for President, but as a citizen -- a proud citizen of the United States, and a fellow citizen of the world."—Senator and Democrat presumptive nominee Barack Hussein Obama

Sen. Barack Obama has not yet secured his Party’s nomination. Sen. Obama has not been elected President of the United States of America. Yet Sen. Obama stood in front of the Victory Column (Siegessaeule) in Berlin and lectured 200,000 German people and called out to the people of the world for all existing divisive walls of the world to be torn down. I think the Senator presumes too much!

"The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes, natives and immigrants, Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand,"—Sen. Barack Hussein Obama

What is so preposterous and hypocritical about a Democrat making such a plea is it was Democrats who have build the walls of partisan separation in this country. A Democrat has no business lecturing the world about tearing down walls that divide, if it were not for Al Gore and the 2000 elections and subsequently the likes of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Charles Schemer, Hillary Clinton, and Howard Dean American would not be stuck in the quagmire of a Red State Blue State divide.

Sen. Obama’s words were words coming from an ultra-Partisan that only beat out a super Partisan Sen. Hillary Clinton because the radical left wing netroots of George Soros and Moveon.org boosted his candidacy to a multimillion dollar campaign victory. This is the same radical far left wing arm of the Democrat Party which wishes to help Sen. Obama secure the Presidency now.

Sen. Obama’s Party is guilty of building walls of partisanship and separation in this country. For almost 8 years Sen. Obama’s Party undermined and demonized the leader of the Free world. So much so that leaders of oppressive theocratic and socialist nations felt welcome to come to the United Nations in New York and denounce our President before the world.

If the world hates America and America’s president it is because Democrats introduced and unleashed the venom of political hatred into the political mainstream of world politics. For Sen. Obama to call on the world to tear down walls epitomizes the sheer two-facedness of the Democrat party.

Sen. Obama’s hypocrisy notwithstanding the question that begs an answer is as a citizen of the world would Sen. Obama’s total allegiance be to the United States of America or would he feel that he is subject to the United Nations’ World Court at The Hague?

For that matter would a President Obama felt that he has two governing principles, the U.S. Constitution and the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to be equally followed?

Would a President Obama allow the World Court to try a U.S. citizen for any reason?

Would a President Obama, and citizen of the world, govern by superceding the U.S. constitution with International law if he felt that it was appropriate to do so?

I don’t know maybe I’m old-fashioned but I think that one should first be President of the United States of America before one goes around the world acting like it and lecturing the world. (Transcript of speech)

People of Berlin - and people of the world - the scale of our challenge is great. The road ahead will be long. But I come before you to say that we are heirs to a struggle for freedom. We are a people of improbable hope. Let us build on our common history, and seize our common destiny, and once again engage in that noble struggle to bring justice and peace to our world.—Barack Hussein Obama

Also, before you call on the people of the world Sen. Obama maybe you should be elected President of the World or some such magnanimous title befitting of someone of your vision to speak to the world’s masses.

I’m thinking that Americans would settle for someone who is an American first, last and always. America now faces challenges that will require the full attention and allegiance of its elected leader someone who will protect American from all enemies both foreign and domestic if that is not your vision as to what an American President is Sen. Obama then maybe you should run for President of the world.

Right now in America it is not the time for blurred citizenship we need a leader who can tell the difference between an American citizen and someone who uses the American citizens. We need a President who will protect America from those who have no allegiance to this great country and its traditions but continue to take her resources and wealth.

America is in serious need of a President, a citizen of America and in your speech before the German people and the world Sen. Obama you told America that, that person is not you! (see entire speech)about 20mins.

Global warming has made us stupid!

Dr. David Evans
I was in a meeting the other day (true story) and the presenter shot this Global warming round off on us a captive audience of about fifty people. She said, “Whether you believe in Global warming or not the climate is changing!”

I don’t know much else of what she said after that because my mind went into overdrive picking apart the logical fallacies of her little sneak assault on the reasoning capabilities of everyone in that room.

This was somewhat of an educated person, she took the time to name her degrees and her expertise, but somehow she didn’t quite understand just how ridiculously preposterous her statement was.

She might as well as said, “Whether you believe in Santa Claus or not there are men dressed in red suits at the mall.”

While it is true that men dress in red suits at the mall, particularity during the holiday season, that does not support nor does it prove that there is a Santa Claus!

Neither does drawing a false correlation between the fact that the earth’s climate does change to validate the erroneous claims of Global warming, prove the theory of Global warming!

Dr David Evans a one time proponent of anthropogenic global warming spent six years doing carbon accounting, building models for the Australian government to estimate carbon emissions from land use change and forestry. When he started that job in 1999 Evans says the evidence that carbon emissions caused global warming seemed pretty conclusive, but since then new evidence has weakened that case. Therefore he is now skeptical.

So scientific evidence changed the mind of Dr. Evans, which is quite extraordinary because global warming was Dr. Evans’ livelihood as he outlines in his article, “I was on the Global warming Gravy Train.”

Coming out against the political correct accepted model that man-made carbon dioxide emissions are the cause for raises in the earth’s temperature would put Dr. Evans out of a job. Yet he did just that with his paper entitled, “Carbon Emissions Don’t Cause Global Warming”

Some of us will continue to accept and support fallacious climate change arguments no matter what the scientific evidence. But according to a growing body of scientist and scientific evidence, “It’s not CO2 that causes Global warming, stupid!” (see video)

Congratulations!!!!!!

The Dems have just come up with a plan........... (finally),
but one that has no chance in hell, of ever working.

Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi intend to block the lifting of the
offshore drilling ban. In their infinite wisdom, and against
the wishes of a very large majority of American voters, the
congressional Democrats will do all they can to prevent
President Bush’s lifting of the offshore drilling ban from
becoming fact.

What is wrong with these morons? Are they that stupid
naturally, or did they have to take special “Congressional
Idiot” courses? With each passing day they show that
their heads and their asses are totally interchangable,
that they took office under false pretenses. As usual,
Democrats campaign promises in no way correlate to fact.

Talk to any first-year economics student, and he/she will
tell you that when the US federal government legislates or
regulates who may buy what on the world market, the trading
simply moves offshore. What good will it do to prevent
oil speculators from running up the market in the US, when
we can only “control” less than 15% of the world’s oil output.
The best that can happen is these speculators will move offshore,
out of reach of the US government, and the idiots who came
up with such a brilliant idea.

Of course it never occurred to them that by immediately
authorizing offshore drilling, opening up Anwar, using the
billions of barrels of shale oil in the Rockies, and authorizing
immediate construction of 45 new nuclear power plants......
we could see improving oil prices thoughout the world in a
couple of months. All that the markets need is the FEAR
that the US will become energy independent quickly, and
you will see prices fall like a lead balloon. The speculators
will tread cautiously, for fear of stepping into the deep end
of the pool, and the Saudis will have to increase production
in order to retain the income to which they have become
accustomed.

Once the urgency is addressed, we can proceed with research
into wind, solar, water and biofuels, which will take much
longer to become a reality, than tapping the oil we know is
in the ground.

In addition to moving toward energy independence, these actions
will create millions of new jobs, and prevent the “tax and spend”
liberals from completely ruining the country. The last thing we
need on top of the present oil crisis, is for some self-serving idiot like Obama to get into office and raise taxes on EVERYONE. If you take a look at his plan, IN DETAIL, his idea of “rich” is anyone making over $50,000 per year. Even if you believe the hype
that he is going to “reduce” your taxes by $1,000, he hides very
well, the undisputable fact that when he allows the Bush tax cuts
to expire...... your taxes will actually RISE by $1,500.00

Don’t blame me,..........I didn’t vote the Democrats into office,
you did!

Lights cameras, action!

Sen. Barack Obama and Afghan President Hamid Karzai in Kabul

It's all fake! It’s the making of the image of a President named Obama. One might call it high drama; I would call it fantasy on the scale of the new Batman movie the Dark Knight. I’m just waiting to see if Keith Ledger’s nomination for an Oscar will be in any way threatened.

Andrea Mitchell just blew up Sen. Obama’s foreign policy burnishing. Chris Matthew’s leg may tingle whenever he hears Barack Obama speak but even a tingling Chris Matthew’s leg wouldn’t help Sen. Obama now.

Obama’s campaign hoped a few pictures with foreign dignitaries and touring the war zone would give the Senator foreign policy credibility by osmosis not to mention the Senator took a plane load of reporters to record the Senators every step.

But wait according to Andrea Mitchell, Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent for NBC News up to this point no reporter has been allowed within arms length of the Senator.

Everything coming out of this trip is completely staged to ensure that the Senator doesn’t make one of the gaffes that he so frequently makes. There has not been one substantial interview by a real reporter. What’s so incredible about this is Mitchell breaks this story and Chris Matthews attempts to continue on with glowing accolades of his hero as if Ms. Mitchell didn’t just bring the whole house down on this made for TV Obama fiction. (see video)



Obama in Iraq a place that by all Democrat accounts Obama shouldn’t even be in, because according to Sen. Harry Reid, Congressman John Murtha and the good Sen. Obama himself the war in Iraq was lost. And Iraq is now under the control of al Qaeda.

What?!? That isn’t so? That’s not the reality of Iraq? The surge actually did work? Iraq is stable enough for a United States presidential hopeful to visit and tour with an entourage of news and campaign filmmakers who will use this trip as a campaign ad for Sen. Obama.

I can’t wait! But in all fairness, I must admit that any campaign ad that I see coming out of the middle east and Europe featuring Sen. Obama will only remind me of how wrong he, his Democrat allies and the Liberal leaning media was about Iraq and the surge. I will see any ad or news account as proof that the Republicans were right and that they alone are deserving of winning in the House, the Senate and the White house in November.

Oh wait a minute Obama’s not using the real reporters that he took to cover his trip, that’s almost as low as planting questions in a democrat debate to make one look good. I guess Obama and Clinton do have some things in common. Clinton plants questions and Obama fakes foreign policy tour movies.

Here’s another movie term, “cut.” Senator Obama will probably hear that term after the fake media and fake film crew wrap up filming his descent on Iraq, only thing is when the Democrats use that term “and run” is usually attached to it!

The Woman is "Wacko"!!!!!

I heard Nancy Pelosi's desperate attempt to take
major swipes at President Bush, as incompetent
and helpless. Well, if he is, it is 100% the
fault of the liberals in Congress.

Have you looked at approval ratings lately? She
had the gall to mention that he now has the lowest
approval rating since he first got into offiice.
Duhhhhhhh........ but she totally failed to mention
that because he is President, legislation that fails
to pass is usually blamed on the man in charge.

It just so happens that most of what Bush has tried
to do since the 2004 elections (misguided at best)
has been thwarted by a partisan and bitter Congress.
Had this pathetic excuse for a Congress (18% approval
rating, by the way) passed worthwhile legislation and
reversed the ban on offshore drilling, we probably
would not be in the situation that we are in right
now. Not with the economy, nor with the high gasoline
prices.

So Nancy, ............. let's put the blame where it
really belongs. Squarely on the shoulders (or hips
as the case may be) of the current "do-nothing" Congress,
with the WORST APPROVAL RATING EVER, in the history of
the United States Congress.

Obama In Iraq

Sen. Obama and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki

On Monday, [Sen. Obama] inspected the southern city of Basra, where an Iraqi-led offensive launched in March broke the control of Shiite militias with suspected links to Iranian forces.

Anbar, meanwhile, was the birthplace of the Sunni insurgency and scene to some of the intense urban battles of the war that Obama has long opposed.—Associated Press

Just the sound of it is astonishing. The sheer irony of this moment should not be lost on anybody! The fact that any United States Democrat can set foot in Iraq is a tribute to President George Bush and the Republicans.

Sen. Obama should have taken out his prayer rug faced west toward the White house, fell on his knees and prayed for the long life of President Bush then the Senator should have repented from his sins of cursing Iraq into the hands of al Qaeda by supporting Democrats efforts to sabotage the United States war efforts all along the way by chanting the Democrat mantra, “We can’t win in Iraq, we can’t win in Iraq!”

Not only that, Democrats including Sen. Obama, were convinced that the surge would not work.



The fact that Sen. Obama is able to travel to a former hotbed of the Sunni insurgency to talk with tribal leaders is a Republican victory, the fact that Sen. Obama could sit in an ornate gold-colored chair next to the Anbar governor, Maamoun Sami Rashid al-Alwani, is a Republican victory, the fact that he also met with Sheik Ahmed Abu Risha, the older brother of Abdul-Sattar Abu Risha, a leader of a Sunni revolt against al-Qaida in Iraq, that too is a Republican victory.(see story)

This trip should be called the “Democratic we were wrong, the Republicans were right Magical Middle East tour”

The fact that Sen. Obama can talk about an "aspirational timeline, with a clear date," for the departure of U.S. combat forces once again is a Republican victory because we all know that if the United States of America were under Democrat leadership we would have cut and run like Sen. Obama, Sen. Harry Reid, Congressman John Murtha and all of the Democrat Congressional leadership along with all of the Democrat leaning media all wanted to do.

For any Democrat to stand in the Middle East and pretend that they know something about foreign policy is a Sen. Hillary Clinton fantasy flight over Bosnia situation. There was no sniper fire as Sen. Clinton imagined as there is nothing that Sen. Obama can do to get foreign policy credentials on a trip, that if his and fellow Democrats’ policies had been enacted, he would not have been able to take!

This whole trip is an attribute to Republican leadership that has produced safety all around the world. Apparently Sen. Obama felt save enough to visit what used to be an al Qaeda stronghold that was taken over by the policies that he and other Democrats fought so hard to defeat.

Republicans should be proud that even a Democrat who was wrong about the war in Iraq can go to Iraq and see the Iraq is not lost to al Qaeda, we are not losing in Iraq and there is progress politically and militarily in Iraq.

When Sen. Obama gets back he ought to go over to the White house and thank President Bush personally for not listening to him and his fellow Democrats about Iraq and then he should apologize for all of the things that he said that were clearly wrong and clearly politically motivated.

But that’ll never happen that’s just my little flight over Bosnia fantasy!

Poor Democrats they think that an Obama field trip equals foreign policy credentials

Sen. Barack Obama

“What you’re about to see is enormous publicity,” Democratic strategist Susan Estrich said. “He’s got three anchors coming with him. He’s got the glitterati of the press corps.”

With his visit, the presumptive Democratic nominee is recreating the kind of public whirlwind that he enjoyed at the height of the Democratic primary — only on a global scale.—Foxnews.com

How do you market your inadequate black male, a term used by Clinton supporter Harriet Christian, to the American people when you know that he hasn’t the experience to lead in this uncertain time.

Why you send him on a week long Middle east, European field trip and when he comes back, voilà! He has foreign policy credentials!

If only it were that easy. If that were the case Jane Fonda’s 70’s two week trip to Hanoi would have qualified her as an expert on the Vietnam war, or Nancy Pelosi’s short trip to Syria at a time of war, a country which was considered to be a state supporter of terrorism certainty makes Pelosi an expert on terrorism or Sen. Hillary Clinton flight over Bosnia undoubtedly make her an expert on American aircraft taking fire over war zones!

Such is the ridiculous thinking of the Democrat Party. Their candidate has virtually no experience or leadership in the area of foreign policy so 4 months before the election of the United States President, Democrats package what equates to a laughable grade school field trip to Afghanistan and Europe to give their candidate the appearance of foreign policy credentials. (See story)

So here’s how a conversation would go, Sen. Obama do you feel that you have the foreign policy experience to lead this nation at this time?

Sen. Obama would probably respond (heavily coached by his Democrat mentors, no doubt) I have spoken to leaders in Afghanistan, Jordan, Israel, Germany, France and England face to face, I have seen our troops doing their jobs and I commend them for their valiant efforts and I believe that I have enough information to make the proper judgments for America in regards to Iraq, Afghanistan and the war on terror.

But not even Democrats really believe that Sen. Obama has the experience to lead no matter what he does in the next 4 months. (see video)



The question is would you hire someone for a job because that person visited one of your work sites or that person had a cadre of friends that would tell them the right things to say in an interview with you?

Democrats are betting the Presidency on the fact that you, dear voter will do exactly that.

A splashy public speech in Germany. A wreath-laying at Israel's Holocaust museum. Perhaps a short side trip to the Palestinian West Bank. A visit to the palace of Jordan's king. Quick stops in Paris and London. They're all on the agenda of Sen. Barack Obama when the presumptive Democratic nominee takes his campaign overseas in the coming days.

The tour is designed to burnish Obama's national security and foreign policy credentials and beef up his image as a commander in chief with U.S. voters as he meets with international leaders. As long as Obama does not make a gaffe, the highly choreographed, nearly weeklong trip may plug what has been a lingering hole in his resume despite more than a year of campaigning.—Lynn Sweet, Sun-Times

Just months ago Democrat leaders and their allies in the media were telling the American people that the surge in Iraq, that General Petraeus advocated and which President Bush put into action, would fail.

Democrat Senate Leader Harry Reid pronounced that the Iraq war was lost, Congressman John Murtha declared that the surge would not work, Moveon.org slandered and libeled the General in a discounted printed ad taken out in the New York Times rhyming the General’s name with betray us. And Sen. Hillary Clinton all but called the General a liar and a toady for the Bush Administration when she said that believing the General’s assessment on Iraq would require, “The willing suspension of disbelief.” But they were all wrong!


No Democrat has, as of this date, apologized or admitted that they showed the slightest bad judgment or that they were just blatantly wrong in talking down our military efforts in Iraq.

No Democrat has denounced those politically motivated acts. Democrat acts which obviously were meant to turn the American people against the war and the president, acts committed to make the war effort look bad for the President’s administration.

Based on the poor judgment that Democrats have made since they voted to give the president the authority to go to war with Iraq, they’ve selected a Chicago community organizer turned one year Senator to be their nominee for the most powerful job in the world. They knowing that he doesn’t have the credentials to lead send him on a week’s tour four months before the election hoping that you will equate this tour with leadership and judgment to lead America.

This is an astounding affront to the intelligence of the American people. Do Democrats honestly believe that the American people can no longer tell the difference between appearances and actuality?

Or maybe it is something even more insidious than that, maybe Democrats believe that Americans don’t care about the quality of their leaders anymore. After all, Democrats did offer up Bill Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry and now Barack Obama.

Democrats are fast becoming the Party of make-believe and tinsel town. From phony sniper fired to phony foreign policy credentials. Make the candidate look presidential, make him seem to have the right credentials and create the image.

Yeah that good enough for a star struck America!

As the great and powerful Oz once said, “Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!” Why because that man really wasn’t great or powerful and I suspect that minus the efforts to make Sen. Obama a world rockstar/foreign policy expert in a week, just a pull back of the media curtain will leave the American people with Harriett Christian’s assessment, the Democrat Party has nominated an inadequate black male.

And then they, the Democrats, have sent him on a field trip to convince you otherwise.

It’s Getting harder to Justify Belief in Global Warming

As real as Global warming?

The American Physical Society, an organization representing nearly 50,000 physicists, has reversed its stance on climate change and is now proclaiming that many of its members disbelieve in human-induced global warming.—Michael Asher

Using Sen. Clinton’s words believing in the theory of anthropogenic global warming requires "a willing suspension of disbelief." The United Nation’s International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and Al Gore says that there is a consensus in the scientific community that anthropogenic Global warming or as it recently called Climate change is caused by man-made emissions of CO2, carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere.

The American Physical Society once lent its voice to the clamor of dire global warming warnings. However the APS no longer believes that Al Gore and James Hansen’s theories are valid.

Jeffrey Marque APS forum editor explains,” There is a considerable presence within the scientific community of people who do not agree with the IPCC conclusion that anthropogenic CO2 emissions are very probably likely to be primarily responsible for global warming that has occurred since the Industrial Revolution."

It’s not the CO2, stupid! And man is not the culprit. In addition to that, the APS is willing to debate all comers unlike Gore and his associates.
Lord Christopher Monckton a UK climate researcher wrote a paper in which he states his beliefs that the IPCC has overstate its case regarding Global warming. Monckton believes that CO2 has little effect on global climate.

Larry Gould, Professor of Physics at the University of Hartford and Chairman of the New England Section of the APS, called Monckton's paper an "expose of the IPCC that details numerous exaggerations and "extensive errors."

In spite of the IPCC errors that Al Gore has based his entire Global warming “Inconvenient Truth” on, Gore was in Washington yesterday attempting to exploit high gas prices in a speech at Washington's Constitution Hall, Gore called for total independence from gasoline within the next 10 years. Sen. George Voinovich (R-Ohio) found Gore’s speech ridiculous.

There’s too much money to be made in Global warming to turn back now, it doesn’t matter whether Global warming is real or not. As Gore said the scientific debate on global warming is over.

Hey I demand a recount! I think there are some hang issues in this debate somebody call an attorney!

World Court Messin’ with Texas

Convicted rapist, murderer Jose Medellin

"The world court has no standing in Texas and Texas is not bound by a ruling or edict from a foreign court, [i]t is easy to get caught up in discussions of international law and justice and treaties. It's very important to remember that these individuals are on death row for killing our citizens."—Robert Black, spokesman for Texas Governor’s Office

The fact that two American teenaged girls were brutality raped for hours, sodomized, and murdered by a gang of six cold-blooded killers almost turns out to be only a subplot for those who support illegal entry into the United States.

In complications that only occur when a nation willfully leaves its borders unenforced coupled with international meddling into U. S. affairs the memories of Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena have been forever diminished by the country of Mexico, President Bush and the International World Court at the Hague.

In spite of ruling of the World Court Texas will continue with the execution of the confessed, tried, and sentenced murderer, Jose Medellin.

Jennifer Ertman, 14 and Elizabeth Pena, 16 are dead due largely because the United States refuses to enforce its borders against the invasion of illegal aliens into the United States.

But somehow the deaths of two teenage American girls is unimportant what is important is that illegal aliens are protected by the full measure of international law and treaties or so it would seem.

The International World Court at the Hague, the United States President, the Mexican Government, the State of Texas and the United States Supreme Court have figuratively battled over the graves of Ertman and Pena on the behalf of an illegal alien, Jose Medellin and his rights as an illegal alien in the United States.

Apparently the inadequate State courts of Texas that tried, convinced and sentenced Medellin to death for the murders was not good enough for the country of Mexico, President Bush and the International Court at the Hague.

The state of Texas rightly tried, convicted and sentenced Medellin to death the same as any citizen of this country. Mexico argued in effect, to the Supreme Court and then to the World Court, that because Medellin is not a citizen of the United States he has special rights.

The United States Supreme Court ruled that the country of Mexico, nor a President of these United States by treaty with a foreign government nor the World Court supercedes the sovereignty of the United States of America.

Jose Medellin is due to be put to death August 5, 2008 by the state of Texas for his part in the cruel and heinous torture, rape, sodomizing and murder of the two American teenagers.

This is an American tragedy that can and should be laid at the feet of everyone who advocates for open borders. You killed Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena just as surely as Jose Medellin and his gang did.

Only you get to pretend that you are not guilty and that you had nothing to do with the deaths of these two young girls.

May Jennifer and Elizabeth now at last rest in peace after they receive a small measure of justice for their untimely deaths and may you all who advocate for open borders be brought to some justice of your own!