The Pot, Calling the Kettle..............

Sorry, I can’t say that word.......... I might be accused
of not being “politically correct”.

I quote from the Associated Press...........

WASHINGTON - The question of whether Sarah Palin has ever been to Iraq pushed Obama aides Saturday to accuse the McCain campaign of outright lies, distortions and distractions to the American people.

Since Republican presidential nominee John McCain tapped the Alaska governor to be his running mate on Aug. 29, questions about her experience have been fueled by her relatively brief tenure in office, as well as a dearth of foreign travel.
Palin made a well-documented trip to Kuwait and Germany last year to visit U.S. troops, and over time, the governor and her staff have revealed she also visited Canada and Mexico. Meanwhile, her aides clarified that a purported visit to Ireland was little more than a refueling stop during her trip to the Middle East.

So now, the Obama campaign is splitting hairs over the “honesty” of the information originally released by the McCain campaign, concerning Sarah Palin’s trips.

In his continuing effort to derail this dynamo to the White House, Obama is questioning her honesty.........hmmmmmmmmmm.

Let’s see now......................

OBAMA'S "NOT EXACTLY'S"

1.) Selma Got Me Born - NOT EXACTLY, your parents felt safe enough to have you in 1961 - Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in 1965. (Google' Obama Selma ' for his full March 4, 2007 speech and articles about its various untruths.)>

2.) Father Was A Goat Herder - NOT EXACTLY, he was a privileged, well educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government.

3.) Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter - NOT EXACTLY, he was part of one of the most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever had.

4.) My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom - NOT EXACTLY, your cousin Raila Odinga has created mass violence in attempting to overturn a legitimate election in 2007, in Kenya It is the first widespread violence in decades. The current government is pro-American but Odinga wants to overthrow it and establish Muslim Sharia law. Your half-brother, Abongo Obama, is Odinga's follower. You interrupted your New Hampshire campaigning to speak to Odinga on the phone.

Obama's cousin Odinga in Kenya ran for president and tried to get Sharia muslim law in place there. When Odinga lost the elections, his followers have burned Christians' homes and then burned men, women and children alive in a Christian church where they took shelter.. Obama SUPPORTED his cousin before the election process here started. Google Obama and Odinga and see what you get. No one wants to know the truth.

5.) My Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian - NOT EXACTLY, she does her daily Salat prayers at 5 AM according to her own interviews. Not to mention, Christianity wouldn't allow her to have been one of 14 wives to 1 man.

6.) My Name is African Swahili - NOT EXACTLY, your name is Arabic and 'Baraka' (from which Barack came) means 'blessed' in that language. Hussein is also Arabic and so is Obama.

Barack Hussein Obama is not half black. If elected, he would be the first Arab-American President, not the first black President. Barack Hussein Obama is 50% Caucasian from his mother's side and 43.75% Arabic and 6.25% African Negro from his father's side. While Barack Hussein Obama's father was from Kenya , his father's family was mainly Arabs.. Barack Hussein Obama's father was only 12..5% African Negro and 87.5% Arab (his father's birth certificate even states he's Arab, not African Negro). From....and for more....go to.....

http://www..arcadeathome.com/newsboy.phtml?Barack_Hussein_Obama_-_Arab-American,_only_6..25%_African

7.) I Never Practiced Islam - NOT EXACTLY, you practiced it daily at school, where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that faith for 31 years, until your wife made you change, so you could run for office. 4-3-08 Article "Obama was 'quite religious in islam'" http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=60559

8.) My School In Indonesia was Christian - NOT EXACTLY, you were registered as Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies for making faces (check your own book).

February 28, 2008. Kristoff from the New York Times a year ago: Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it'll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset." This is just one example of what Pamela is talking about when she says "Obama's narrative is being altered, enhanced and manipulated to whitewash troubling facts."

9.) I Was Fluent In Indonesian - NOT EXACTLY, not one teacher says you could speak the language.

10.) Because I Lived In Indonesia , I Have More Foreign Experience - NOT EXACTLY, you were there from the ages of 6 to 10, and couldn't even speak the language. What did you learn, how to study the Koran and watch cartoons.

11.) I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs - NOT EXACTLY, except for Africa (surprise) and the Middle East (bigger surprise), you have never been anywhere else on the planet and thus have NO experience with our closest allies.

12.) I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion - NOT EXACTLY, you were quite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no mention of Kenya and no mention of struggle to identify - your classmates said you were just fine.

13.) An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office - NOT EXACTLY, Ebony has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist.

14.) A Life Magazine Article Changed My outlook on Life - NOT EXACTLY, Life has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist.

15.) I Won't Run On A National Ticket In '08 - NOT EXACTLY, here you are, despite saying, live on TV,
> that you would not have enough experience by then, and you are all about having experience first.>

16.) Voting "Present" is Common In Illinois Senate - NOT EXACTLY, they are common for YOU, but not many others have 130 NO-VOTES.

17.) Oops, I Mis-voted - NOT EXACTLY, only when caught by church groups and Democrats, did you beg to change your mis-vote.

18.) I Was A Professor Of Law - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.

19.) I Was A Constitutional Lawyer - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.

20.) Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill - NOT EXACTLY, you didn't write it, introduce it, change it, or create it.

21.) The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass - NOT EXACTLY, it took just 14 days from start to finish.

22.) I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill - NOT EXACTLY, your bill was rejected by your own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation - mainly because of your Nuclear donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came.

23.) I Have Released My State Records - NOT EXACTLY, as of March, 2008, state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be released, exposing all the special interests pork hidden within.

24.) I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess - NOT EXACTLY, you were part of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld Gardens . You failed to mention anyone else but yourself, in your books. >

25.) My Economics Bill Will Help America - NOT EXACTLY, your 111 economic policies were just combined into a proposal which lost 99-0, and even YOU voted against your own bill. >

26.) I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois - NOT EXACTLY, even your own supporters claim to have not seen BOLD action on your part.

27.) I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year - NOT EXACTLY, they were not YOUR bills, but rather handed to you, after their creation by a fellow Senator, to assist you in a future bid for higher office.

28.) No One on my campaign contacted Canada about NAFTA - NOT EXACTLY, the Candian Government issued the names and a memo of the conversation your campaign had with them.

29.) I Am Tough On Terrorism - NOT EXACTLY, you missed the Iran Resolution vote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah supports the destruction of Israel .

30.) I Want All Votes To Count - NOT EXACTLY, you said let the delegates decide.

31.) I Want Americans To Decide - NOT EXACTLY, you prefer caucuses that limit the vote, confuse the voters, force a public vote, and only operate during small windows of time.

32.) I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate - NOT EXACTLY, you passed 26, most of which you didn't write yourself.

33.) I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics - NOT EXACTLY, you used tactics to eliminate Alice Palmer from running against you.

34.) I Don't Take PAC Money - NOT EXACTLY, you take loads of it.

35.) I don't Have Lobbyists - NOT EXACTLY, you have over 47 lobbyists, and counting.

36.) My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad - NOT EXACTLY, your own campaign worker made the ad on his Apple in one afternoon.

37.) I Have Always Been Against Iraq - NOT EXACTLY, you weren't in office to vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time.

38.) I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care - NOT EXACTLY, your plan leaves us all to pay for the 15,000,000 who don't have to buy it

God help us if we just sit idly by and let this person become our next president. It would be suicidal for us to do nothing to prevent this from happening. Copy and paste this and send it to everyone that you know. It's time that the "Silent Majority" takes a stand. Please get out to vote on Election Day, if you care about our country.

The “Ladies” of the View

What a misnomer............ !

To anyone who saw the hatchet job that those rejects
from real life tried to do, remember what I write here.

Joy, who was her usual “lovely” self, was bed enough,
but I was totally surprised by the way that Barbara
Walters attacked McCain, without even giving him a
chance to respond. She pressed and pressed, in an
obvious attempt to rattle him into possibly saying
that could be misconstrued later.

I, along with thousands of others, took note that at no
time did she look McCain in the face, but rather had her
eyes riveted on the monitor that was facing her. That
made it obvious that this entire “interview” was a left-
wing set-up, in order to make him look as bad as possible
to the viewing audience.

Her unwarranted attacks on Sarah Palin were also quite
vehement and irritating. At no point, did she allow
John McCain a moment to gather two thoughts together,
and I guess that was her intention. Barbara, you gave
away your liberal position within the first three minutes
of the interview.

To pretend to host an “interview” and then have the
audacity to spring onto the attack without warning is both
despicable and typical of the left. Had it not been for
Cindy McCain putting Walters in her place, with a lot more
class than Barbara could ever have, the interview might
have been a total disaster. Manufactured, of course.

My analysis of that fiasco is that the ones to get hurt the
most are the “Witches of Viewick” and not Senator John
McCain nor Governor Sarah Palin. Any viewers with
intelligence could see right through this oh so obvious
plan, whether hatched by Barbara Walters or ABC.

And speaking of ABC, Charles Gibson tried real hard to
throw a few curve balls at Sarah Palin during her interview.
I think that she hit them right back at him. Particularly
the ones concerning the non-existent “Bush Doctrine”

Democrats Deceptive on Drilling!!!!!

The Dems are doing everything they can to shift
the blame for their no-action Congress onto the
Bush administration and the Republicans in general.

Now they are accusing the Republicans of not being
cooperative in speedily passing their “new” energy
bill. They have taken the original intention of the
bill and added all kinds of earmarks and windfall
programs to it. Why can’t we just have the “drill
here, drill now” legislation that the voters want?
All they really have to do is lift the Federal ban
on offshore drilling.

Their thinly disguised "new" plan to allow offshore drilling
is merely a rehash of their previous crap. They keep
saying “let the oil companies drill in the areas in which
they already hold leases”................... hello!!!!.... every
time they try, the liberal Democratic-backed “green
groups” file suits through their closest ally, the ACLU.
The “Gorites” got a stronger grip on the Congress, since
the “inventor of the internet” managed to pull off the
biggest coup in history, by getting the Nobel Peace Prize
for something that he really knows nothing about. This
“green hysteria” ignited the volcano, that just might
blow the Dems right back where they were four years
ago.

Face it!!! Our (well, maybe yours, because I didn’t vote
for any of these phonies) elected Democratic Congressmen and
women, headed up by “Captain” Harry Reid and “First Mate”
Nancy Pelosi, couldn’t care less about you and me. For them,
it’s still all about “me”, power, and the ship of state, and let the
public be damned. For all their pre-election hype, they are just
yesterdays warmed-over milk-toast.

I hope that the sheep who in ‘06, followed the advice of the labor
unions, Wall Street, and the Environmentalists, with the
help of the MSM, will finally admit that they made an
enormous mistake in 2006, and fix the congress. This time,
not with partisan “revenge-seekers”, but with honest, caring
public servants, who truly represent the will of the people.

Change is coming, and let’s hope it's in the public's best interest!

Would Jesus Organize for ACORN

ACORN or the “Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now” is a radical 60’s style “In Your Face” group that Barack Obama proudly claims association with. Though Sen. Obama worked with other groups primarily it is this group that Obama cut his “community organizer” chops with.

Investigative reporter Stanley Kurtz in his, “Inside Obama’s ACORN” shows us a better picture of what Sen. Obama did as a community organizer as he also helps us to understand the workings of the political action group, ACORN. (see article)

What is interesting to me is that several Democrats have made the claim that Jesus was a community Organizer in answer to Republican Vice President hopeful Sarah Palin’s remark that Democrat look down on her experience as a small town mayor so she equated her experience to that of a community organizer only her job had responsibilities.

This remark drew the ire of Obama supporters who like Congressman Steve Cohen wants to make it plain that organizing for the community should in no wise be looked down upon because Jesus the Christ himself was a community organizer. Cohen makes this observation on the floor of Congress: (see video)



In his article Mr. Kurtz lays out that Sen. Obama was a trainer of ACORN leadership as well Obama trained members in techniques of direct political action, which is protesting and storming meetings. Yet a recent look at the organization shows some startling lack of organization and ethics. (see video)





ACORN seems to be less than discriminatory in their hiring practices too. (see video)




And once hired ACORN doesn’t seem to want to pay workers wages which is ironic because one of ACORN’s main political action items is to fight for higher worker’s wages. (see video)




Instead of the small army of reporters, lawyers and investigators that have descended on the small Alaskan town of Wasilla to attempt to find something to damage Gov. Sarah Palin if there is a real story, and there is, that story is how the political Jesus, Barack Hussein Obama has turned the political water of community organizing for ACORN into the political wine of running to be President of the United States of America.

Some unbelieving skeptics should look into this miracle.

Hmmmmmmmmmm!

I just finished watching the “9/11 Presidential Forum”.
Several things struck me. Senator Obama echoed much of
what Senator McCaine said, almost to the letter, with the
exception that Obama got much more applause, even when
the audience was not supposed to do that. And the reason
for that?............... the forum was held at Columbia
University, Senator Obama’s Alma Mater.

I applaud Senator McCain for mentioning that Columbia
should have an ROTC presence on campus. During his time
slot, Senator Obama agreed with John McCain, probably much
to the chagrin of the president of Columbia. Both candidates
want to see more volunteer cooperation, but McCain wants it
to be primarily voluntary, with no remuneration whatsoever,
while Obama seems to tie all his suggestions up with additional
benefits for the volunteers.............meaning more government
supervision or cooperation and probably remuneration. One
way or the other, Obama’s plans will involve bigger government
and more federal expenditures. So where is the "volunteerism"?

I was fascinated by how Obama twisted the “community organizer”
flap around, to make it seem as though he was attacked by the
Republicans. He seems to forget that it was his campaign that
initiated the exchange, by accusing Sarah Palin of being unqualified, based on the fact that she had been a small-town mayor. Two things that they totally failed to mention were that Sarah Palin was mayor for a ten year period, before moving on to Governor of Alaska, which Obama’s campaign always seems to ignore.
Obama's "community organizer" accomplishments pale in comparison. w

On a one-on-one basis, there is no way that Obama’s two years
as a junior senator can hold a candle to even the small-town mayor
standing of McCain’s choice of VP candidate. Add to that the
prestige and experience of her Governorship, and the undeniable
fact that Obama has been campaigning for half of his tenure in the
senate. Just more cheap shot by Obama...........even at such a forum.

Aside from that, both the candidates more or less agreed on quite
a few points. But.................did anyone notice that Obama quoted McCain word for word, as though this were his original statement? At the end of his segment, he stated that, “change happens from the bottom up, not from the top down”............wow, how original!

McCain has been saying that for weeks!

Another Example of Dem Hypocrisy!

One of the Obama campaign’s chief talking points is
the "high rate of unemployment" that we presently have.
But yet, they still aim to compound the problem.

This is how the Democrats have been able to “increase
their voter registration”, by filling the country with aliens,
legal and not. And at the same time taking a swipe at the
Bush administration for having lost American jobs.
Not to mention (ahem!) that the unemployment rate during the
Clinton years was higher.

The U.S. House Judiciary Committee desperately wants
to give away 550,000 American jobs! If it were to pass, H.R. 5882 would bring in 550,000 permanent greencard holders, above the 1 million immigrants already planned! With U.S. unemployment shooting up to a five-year high, this is the very worst time to add more competition to Americans.

But Nancy Pelosi and her allies backed down yesterday before they could get the immigration increase past the Judiciary Committee. They thought it would be easy. Instead, they ran into a buzzsaw.

Thanks to caring groups such as “Numbers USA”, (check it out), the
Congress has been flooded with phone calls and faxes,
virtually killing the “Democratic give-a-way of American
jobs”.


And then the Obama campaign has the gall to accuse the
Bush administration of causing Americans to lose jobs overseas?

This is political BS, and the voters should be made to know
just who is causing this and why this is happening.

I can assure everyone that if Obama is elected, we can all kiss
our jobs goodbye. Or maybe we should all just move to Mexico,
since there will no longer be anybody there!

Community Organizer-in-Chief

Obama teaching at the University of Chicago Law School. The topic is apparently “Power Analysis,” also his topic at ACORN training. The illustration is Labeled “Relationships Built on Self Interest.”

"I don't intend to lose this election. John McCain doesn't know what he's up against."—Senator Barack Obama

Now that’s an ominous statement wouldn’t you say, someone campaigning to become President of the United States of America using a veiled threat of some sort against his rival and just what is Senator McCain up against when he campaigns against Barack Hussein Obama?

Sen. Obama is a community organizer turned politician by his own admission, so just what is a community organizer any way?

I’m thinking if placing lipstick on a pig still results in a pig then a community organizer elected to the White house will still be nothing more than a community organizer.

Here’s a truth, you can put a community organizer in the White house but you’ll still have a community organizer and not a President. Any ways here’s how Senator Obama is connected with the notorious left wing political agitation group ACORN.

[…]ACORN noticed him when he was organizing on the far south side of the city with the Developing Communities Project.

He was a very good organizer. When he returned from law school, we asked him to help us with a lawsuit to challenge the state of Illinois’ refusal to abide by the National Voting Rights Act, also known as motor voter… Obama took the case, known as ACORN vs. Edgar (the name of the Republican governor at the time) and we won.

Obama then went on to run a voter registration project with Project VOTE in 1992 that made it possible for Carol Moseley Braun to win the Senate that year. Project VOTE delivered 50,000 newly registered voters in that campaign (ACORN delivered about 5000 of them).

Since then, we have invited Obama to our leadership training sessions to run the session on power every year, and, as a result, many of our newly developing leaders got to know him before he ever ran for office.

Thus, it was natural for many of us to be active volunteers in his first campaign for State Senate and then his failed bid for U.S. Congress in 1996. By the time he ran for U.S. Senate, we were old friends.—Toni Foulks, a representative of ACORN (see source)

So Sen. Obama was a community organizer for a community group with the acronym ACORN or the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, that is a radical left wing agitation group which still to this day receives federal funding for its voters registration arm.

But registering voters is not all that ACORN does, ACORN attempts to rally the vote for particular candidates but first what is ACORN: (see video)



ACORN also holds Rallies as a political action group mostly encouraging those who would identify with left wing ideology to get out and vote. (see video)



There have been accusations of corrupt practices regarding collection of voter registration cards and ACORN Voter registration collectors falsifying voter registration cards.(see video)



Maybe Senator Obama is correct, maybe Senator McCain doesn’t know what he’s going up against. Maybe Senator Obama should tell us all exactly what ACORN is about. In the least tell us what role they are playing in this election.

…according to ACORN, Obama trained its Chicago members in leadership seminars for several years in the early '90s. And Obama sat on the boards of the Woods Fund and Joyce Foundation, both of which poured money into ACORN's coffers.

Naturally, ACORN's political action committee has warmly endorsed his presidential candidacy.—Michelle Malkin

Tony Rezko,Weatherman terrorist William Ayers, Rev. Jeremiah Wright and now ACORN, just another in a long line of radical affiliations in the life of the most Liberal and inexperienced Democrat candidate to run for president of the United States Sen Barack Hussein Obama the Democrat presumptive Community Organizer-in-Chief.

The Commander-in-Speech

Chris Matthews reporting on the Commander-in-Speech

Just what are Senator Barack Obama’s accomplishments? Two autobiographies; “Dreams From My Father”, “The Audacity of Hope” and a speech that he gave at the 2004 Democrat Convention. In just under 4 years Obama has only 143 working days in the Senate and has no legislative accomplishes.

In addition to that Obama hasn’t chaired any major committees in just under 4 years of service in the U.S. Senate and now He’s running for the highest political office in the United States of America.

Prior to that Sen. Obama was a 5 year part-time Illinois state legislator with no major legislative history in the Illinois state senate.

Obama who said in 2004 after he won the U.S. Senate Illinois senate seat that he would not consider running for the Presidency in 2008 because he wouldn’t know what he’d be doing. So essentially Sen. Obama felt that he wouldn’t have the experience or the qualifications to ran for president in 2008, boy what a difference 143 working days in the Senate make. NOT!!!

So the Democrat electorate by-passed all the more qualified candidates; Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana, Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware, Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut, Senator John Edwards of No. Carolina, Congressman Dennis Kucinich Ohio, Governor William B. Richardson of New Mexico and Senator Hillary Clinton of New York, all who have more experience than Barack Obama yet Democrats threw experience aside because they wanted the “Speech.”

Even though everyone knows that Sen. Obama isn’t experience enough to do the job Obama seems to believes that campaigning for the presidency is all the experience one needs to be President. (see video)



In spite of the fact that Obama doesn’t have the experience he just might pull it off and become the first affirmative action Black candidate to become president. (see video)



And the speech that got Sen. Obama launched on the trajectory to become the first Black President of these United States of America, I thought that you might enjoy seeing some excerpts from Senator Obama’s 2004 Democratic Convention speech. The speech that made Sen. Obama instantly qualified to became President. (see video)



All Hail to the Commander-in-Speech Barack Hussein Obama! And thank God for general elections where Independents and Republicans wouldn’t let the Democrat’s mistake punish us with an Inadequate Black Male President in the person of one Senator Barack Hussein Obama!

N.O.W.

The “women” of NOW, best described as very liberal,
feminine men, would do themselves a very big favor
if they would return to their roots.

Their original purpose was for all women to come
together and support one another. It was to have
been an organization, national in scope, to foster the
fair and equal treatment of women in all walks of life.

What a joke this has turned out to be. It has been
hijacked by the far left, and is presently being used
as a “hit” group for the ultra-liberals in the country,
from which to launch their unwarranted personal attacks.

This is an organization that should have been touting the
accomplishments of Sarah Palin, instead of trying to
destroy her. But....... I guess now, when you join such a
group as this, you do so with the hope of banning together
with a bunch of wanna-bees, who are nothing more than
frustrated women with penis-envy, you get what you deserve.
They will go plodding on, keeping the polyester suit makers
in business, in a vain attempt to present a strong front for a
failing organization.

False nomenclature, without a doubt. Maybe they should
consider renaming this group. NoOvarianWhining!

Obama’s Lipstick Smears!!!!

Well, I guess there is no doubt about it now. The
so-called “outsider” in politics, the man who could
change Washington, has shown the world that he
is simply a run-of-the-mill. hack politician, who much
against his claims, deals in the dirty politics of
personal attacks...... and from the bottom of the deck.

He has a history of this. He gained his position in
Chicago by having his opponents eliminated on
“technicalities”, leaving a clear field for him, with
no opposition. He deftly managed to sweep Hillary
from contention, and then, instead of giving her at
least the position she had earned, he works a deal with
her to help her pay a portion of her campaign debt.
All the traits of the old, corrupt, Chicago democratic
machine!!!!

This wanna-be is nothing more than a gutter-snipe
in an expensive suit. And the entire Democratic
campaign is in a conspiracy to try to destroy Sarah
Palin, who has resurrected the Republican party.

Suddenly, the Democratic men seem to be very
interested in “lipstick”. First Biden took a swipe
at Sarah Palin, using the word, and then Obama did.

It was no coincidence, and one that was certainly
not lost on his bevy of followers, when Obama took
an oh-so-obvious, dirty swipe at Sarah Palin. Her
statement during her acceptance speech, that "the
difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull is
lipstick", was with deliberate viciousness, mimicked
by Senator Obama. His radical followers reveled
in his insulting remark that, “you can put lipstick on
a pig, and it’s still a pig”. I take this as meant to be
a swipe at all women....... even the ultra-liberal hacks
at organizations such as NOW.

We have already heard his defenders knocking
themselves out, trying to explain that he was referring to
John McCain, and not Sarah Palin. But tell me!
What on earth has lipstick to do with John McCain?..and
what are the chances of any opposing candidate
“accidentally” using the word “lipstick” in a speech
only one week after the first female candidate did???

You figure it out!

I guess when you feel yourself seriously slipping in the
polls, you pull out all the stops, no matter how dirty!

These Democrats just don’t get it

Sen. Joe Biden

Sen. Biden is a man of distinguished public service. That doesn’t excuse poor logic or bad facts.

Asked when life begins, Sen. Biden said that, “It is a personal and private issue.” But in reality, modern biology knows exactly when human life begins; at the moment of conception. Religion has nothing to do with it.

People might argue when human “personhood” begins – though that leads public policy in very dangerous directions – but no one can any longer clam that the beginning of life is a matter of religious opinion.—Archbishop Charles J. Chaput

There is no wonder Liberals and Democrats are so confused with leaders like Sens. Barack “Above my pay grade” Obama and Joe “I love to hear myself speak” Biden, Democrats can’t help but except inferior ideas and clouded truth.

If you saw Meet the Press last Sunday you probably missed Tim Russert like I did. Tom Brokaw who hosted the program is no Tim Russert, Brokaw is more like a dithering old drunk slurring his words and ideas like an Anon devotee on weekend leave. Hi Tom!

Mr. Brokaw brought up the subject that speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi just got skewered for by the Catholic Church, Abortion. (see story)

The Church in a rare rebuke which was directed at Pelosi, declared the Congresswoman’s views regarding abortion are contradictory to the Churches teachings and her ideas regarding abortion are simply wrong.

Not only that Sen. Obama blew this same question weeks ago at the Saddleback Church so badly that he is now apologizing for being to flippant in his answer. It must be tiring having to go back and constantly correct what you’ve said, Sen. Obama.

Since Obama and Pelosi had so much trouble with this question Brokaw thought he would allow Biden to clean it up, a third bite of the apple if you will. Sen. Biden is asked by the drunk sounding Brokaw when life begins and this was Biden’s response: (see video)



WHAT? Does Biden think because of his much speaking that he is fooling any one? Well that answer Sen. Biden was a hot mess! So much so, that Sen. Biden, a Catholic , drew his own person rebuke from the Catholic church by Archbishop Charles J. Chaput. (see letter)

In his Meet the Press interview, Sen. Biden used a morally exhausted argument that American Catholics have been hearing for 40 years; i.e., that Catholics can’t “impose” their religiously based views on the rest of the country.

But resistance to abortion is a matter of human rights, not religious opinion. And the senator knows very well as a lawmaker that all law involves the imposition of some people’s convictions on everyone else. That is the nature of the law.

American Catholics have allowed themselves to be bullied into accepting the destruction of more than a million developing unborn children a year. Other people have imposed their “pro-choice” beliefs on American society without any remorse for decades.—Archbishop Charles J. Chaput

If only Democrats in the Democrat Party were as discerning as the Church, Obama, Biden and Pelosi would be excommunicated from the Party for reckless distortion of the truth.

Democrats may be accepting of lying and delusional politicians like Obama, Biden and Pelosi but come November Democrats may find that the other half of the country Independents and Conservatives, like the Church, have a higher standard for truth telling.

As well Independents and Conservatives have a much higher standard for candidate qualifications.

OBAMA'S "NOT EXACTLY'S"

(1.) Selma Got Me Born - NOT EXACTLY, your parents felt safe enough to have you in 1961 - Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in 1965. (Google' Obama Selma ' for his full March 4, 2007 speech and articles about its various untruths.)


(2.) Father Was A Goat Herder - NOT EXACTLY, he was a privileged, well educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government.


(3.) Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter - NOT EXACTLY, he was part of one of the most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever had.


(4.) My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom - NOT EXACTLY, your cousin Raila Odinga has created mass violence in attempting to overturn a legitimate election in 2007, in Kenya It is the first widespread violence in decades. The current government is pro-American but Odinga wants to overthrow it and establish Muslim Sharia law. Your half-brother, Abongo Obama, is Odinga's follower. You interrupted your New Hampshire campaigning to speak to Odinga on the phone.

Obama's cousin Odinga in Kenya ran for president and tried to get Sharia muslim law in place there. When Odinga lost the elections, his followers have burned Christians' homes and then burned men, women and children alive in a Christian church where they took shelter.. Obama SUPPORTED his cousin before the election process here started. Google Obama and Odinga and see what you get. No one wants to know the truth.


(5.) My Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian - NOT EXACTLY, she does her daily Salat prayers at 5 AM according to her own interviews. Not to mention, Christianity wouldn't allow her to have been one of 14 wives to 1 man.


(6.) My Name is African Swahili - NOT EXACTLY, your name is Arabic and 'Baraka' (from which Barack came) means 'blessed' in that language. Hussein is also Arabic and so is Obama.

Barack Hussein Obama is not half black. If elected, he would be the first Arab-American President, not the first black President. Barack Hussein Obama is 50% Caucasian from his mother's side and 43.75% Arabic and 6.25% African Negro from his father's side. While Barack Hussein Obama's father was from Kenya , his father's family was mainly Arabs.. Barack Hussein Obama's father was only 12..5% African Negro and 87.5% Arab (his father's birth certificate even states he's Arab, not African Negro). From....and for more....go to.....

http://www..arcadeathome.com/newsboy.phtml?Barack_Hussein_Obama_-_Arab-American,_only_6..25%_African


(7.) I Never Practiced Islam - NOT EXACTLY, you practiced it daily at school, where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that faith for 31 years, until your wife made you change, so you could run for office.
4-3-08 Article "Obama was 'quite religious in islam'" http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=60559


(8.) My School In Indonesia was Christian - NOT EXACTLY, you were registered as Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies for making faces (check your own book).

February 28, 2008. Kristoff from the New York Times a year ago: Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it'll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset." This is just one example of what Pamela is talking about when she says "Obama's narrative is being altered, enhanced and manipulated to whitewash troubling facts."


(9.) I Was Fluent In Indonesian - NOT EXACTLY, not one teacher says you could speak the language.


(10.) Because I Lived In Indonesia , I Have More Foreign Experience - NOT EXACTLY, you were there from the ages of 6 to 10, and couldn't even speak the language. What did you learn, how to study the Koran and watch cartoons.

(11.) I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs - NOT EXACTLY, except for Africa (surprise) and the Middle East (bigger surprise), you have never been anywhere else on the planet and thus have NO experience with our closest allies.

(12.) I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion - NOT EXACTLY, you were quite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no mention of Kenya and no mention of struggle to identify - your classmates said you were just fine.

(13.) An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office - NOT EXACTLY, Ebony has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist.

(14.) A Life Magazine Article Changed My outlook on Life - NOT EXACTLY, Life has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist.

(15.) I Won't Run On A National Ticket In '08 - NOT EXACTLY, here you are, despite saying, live on TV,
that you would not have enough experience by then, and you are all about having experience first.

(16.) Voting "Present" is Common In Illinois Senate - NOT EXACTLY, they are common for YOU, but not many others have 130 NO-VOTES.

(17.) Oops, I Mis-voted - NOT EXACTLY, only when caught by church groups and Democrats, did you beg to change your "mis-vote".

(18.) I Was A Professor Of Law - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.

(19.) I Was A Constitutional Lawyer - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.

(20.) Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill - NOT EXACTLY, you didn't write it, introduce it, change it, or create it.

(21.) The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass - NOT EXACTLY, it took just 14 days from start to finish.

(22.) I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill - NOT EXACTLY, your bill was rejected by your own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation - mainly because of your Nuclear donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came.

(23.) I Have Released My State Records - NOT EXACTLY, as of March, 2008, state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be released, exposing all the special interests pork hidden within.

(24.) I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess - NOT EXACTLY, you were part of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld Gardens . You failed to mention anyone else but yourself, in your books.

(25.) My Economics Bill Will Help America - NOT EXACTLY, your 111 economic policies were just combined into a proposal which lost 99-0, and even YOU voted against your own bill.

(26.) I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois - NOT EXACTLY, even your own supporters claim to have not seen BOLD action on your part.

(27.) I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year - NOT EXACTLY, they were not YOUR bills, but rather handed to you, after their creation by a fellow Senator, to assist you in a future bid for higher office.

(28.) No One on my campaign contacted Canada about NAFTA - NOT EXACTLY, the Candian Government issued the names and a memo of the conversation your campaign had with them.

(29.) I Am Tough On Terrorism - NOT EXACTLY, you missed the Iran Resolution vote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah supports the destruction of Israel .

(30.) I Want All Votes To Count - NOT EXACTLY, you said let the delegates decide.

(31.) I Want Americans To Decide - NOT EXACTLY, you prefer caucuses that limit the vote, confuse the voters, force a public vote, and only operate during small windows of time.

(32.) I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate - NOT EXACTLY, you passed 26, most of which you didn't write yourself.

(33.) I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics - NOT EXACTLY, you used tactics to eliminate Alice Palmer from running against you.

(34.) I Don't Take PAC Money - NOT EXACTLY, you take loads of it.

(35.) I don't Have Lobbyists - NOT EXACTLY, you have over 47 lobbyists, and counting.

(36.) My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad - NOT EXACTLY, your own campaign worker made the ad on his Apple in one afternoon.

(37.) I Have Always Been Against Iraq - NOT EXACTLY, you weren't in office to vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time.

(38.) I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care - NOT EXACTLY, your plan leaves us all to pay for the 15,000,000 who don't have to buy it

GOD HELP US IF WE JUST SIT IDLY BY AND LET THIS PERSON BECOME OUR NEXT PRESIDENT. IT WOULD BE SUICIDAL FOR US TO DO NOTHING TO PREVENT THIS FROM HAPPENING. PASS THIS ON TO ALL THE ONES YOU VALUE, JUST AS I AM DOING. IT'S TIME THE "SILENT MAJORITY" TAKE A STAND! GET OUT AND VOTE! PLEASE!

The Left is Hatin’ on Palin

Gov. Sarah Palin
She is all woman no doubt; wife, mother, business woman, executive and now Republican Vice-President nominee. So who is trying to destroy her and why?

Sen. Obama is because he’s wanted to be President since he was in Kindergarten only thing is compared to Sarah Palin’s accomplishments Sen. Obama is exposed as the inadequate Black male that Hillary Clinton backer Harriet Christian described him as.

Obama’s thin résumé and premature campaign to be President is a gross overstep which he and the Democrat Party is betting that Americans will overlook if he uses the standard Democrat playbook of 1) Bush bashing, 2) talking America’s war effort down, 3) talking the economy down, 4) linking Senator McCain with President Bush, then 5) talking Sen. McCain down and finally 6) attempting to destroying Gov. Sarah Palin.

Sen. Obama is not the only one who wishes Gov. Palin’s political career ill the radical Liberal Left sees Sen. McCain’s choice for Vice President as a threat too.

From the instant of Palin's designation on Friday, August 29, the American left went into a collective mass seizure from which it shows no sign of emerging.

The left blogosphere and elite media have, for the moment, joined forces and become indistinguishable from each other, and from the supermarket tabloids, in their desire to find and use anything that will criminalize and/or humiliate Palin and her family.

In sharp contrast to the yearlong restraint shown toward truthful reports about John Edwards's affair, bizarre rumors have been reported as news, and, according to McCain campaign director Steve Schmidt, nationally known members of the elite media have besieged him with preposterous demands.—Jeffrey Bell, the weekly standard

Gov. Palin is seen as a threat to the Left’s narrative that a woman must choose between career and family and that only the Democrat Party would allow a minority the opportunity to be President of the United States. (see story)

If the McCain Palin ticket should win that would mean that Hillary Clinton would not be the presumptive first woman President of the United States of America, Gov. Palin would. Palin would because as Vice President in addition to her already solid résumé Gov. Palin would have more real experience than any other woman who could run for the office only the left means to prevent that by destroying Sarah Palin.

Flag Flak!

Just watch the Obama campaign continue to squeel and
protest this new campaign incident.

The Republican National Convention, used 12,000 small
American flags, that were supposedly rescued from a
dumpster outside the Democratic Convention Center.

A nearby concession stand owner, noticed after the close of
the convention, some 25-30 plastic garbage bags, in and
around the dumpsters. They were filled to the bursting
point with the small flags that the delegates were
waving during the Republican Convention.

The Obama campaign insists that the flags were "extras"
and were intended for storange, and the the McCain
campaign illegally took them from the location. Since
when do American flags get "stored" in dumpsters........
Mr "Patriotic" Obama?

Wiggle out of this one, if you think that you can. This
is one issue that won't go away before election day. You
can count on that..........even if it means that I have
to post it every day!!!!

Ranks right along with Michelle's "proud" statement, the
William Ayers association, and the "Reverand" Wright
controversy.

Way to go.........NOBAMA!!!!!

Bitter, Bitter, Biddie!

I just finished reading Froma Harrop’s commentary on
John McCain’s Vice Presidential choice, at Rasmussen
Reports. Froma Harrop.......... for the sake of expediency,
I’ll just call her “frump”, starts out by attacking Sarah
Palin, and winds up attacking John McCain. This is a true
"liberal hit piece".........right out of the box.

This woman is so obviously a die-hard women’s libber in
the third tri-mester of frustration. She tries really
hard to dissuade anyone from voting for Sarah Palin,
based on her own warped thinking and conversation with
one friend.

Her quote, “Don't They Have Birth Control up in Alaska?”,
is not only demeaning, but disgusting. Maybe where
“frump” comes from, it’s expected that all teenagers
should be encouraged to engage in sexual conduct, ever protected.
Somebody should wise-up “frump” and tell
her that she doesn’t represent the entire US, nor does
she speak for the world.

More admire the Palins strong moral stand, than this
obviously transparent attempt by “frumpie” to blacken
Sarah Palin’s reputation with half-truths and inuendo...
even calling the Palin family “dysfunctional” I can only
imagine what “frumpies” family is like......... but then...
....... no one here is running a kangaroo court.

I see a past-prime writer, who actually believes that she
speaks for most of the women in the United States. I
know far too many of them to believe that a bitter, dried
up wanna-be is representative of intelligent married women
and single moms, many of whom have faced the same personal
family problems.

“Frump” is so typical of the aging women’s liberation
movement. You know the ones I mean. Those who
demonstrate at the drop of a hat, and keep the “polyester
pants suit” manufacturers in business. They feel that it
is their duty to dictate just when another, far more
qualified woman, should run for public office. Sarah
Palin was right!!! What really pisses women like this one
off, is that Sarah isn’t looking for their approval.

So stick with your friends “frump”............. because
nothing is so reassuring as speaking to the choir.
Time will tell just how much back-lash your ultra-critical
and intentionally biased article brings.

You do realize that she will be the next Vice President
of the United States, don’t you? You have just helped
her along.

It all comes down to Change

Republican Presidential Nominee Sen. John McCain
In November of 2006 I wrote to expose Democrats’ campaign of hate hoping that the American people would see though partisan attempts to vilify Republicans and George W. Bush making those names synonymous with everything that is wrong in America.

It is no secret that Democrats hate Republicans and everything that they stand for because we have witnessed 6 years of pure unadulterated hate coming from the Democrat’s side of the aisle very little policy, plan or vision for America but big hate of Republican ideas, Republican policy and Republican values.

Democrats are hoping that 6 years of talking down the Republicans will result in victories across America and control of either or both of the Senate and House of Representatives. Democrats are counting on the growing discontent with the war that they have helped to ferment will sweep them into control of power in America.

Democrats are depending on the politics of hate to be a winner for them on Tuesday.—Alaphiah

Democrats were successful in branding the Republicans in 2006 as they were successful in winning the advantage that they sought in Congress that year.

The method which Democrats used to win in 2006 is what inspired this blog. Democrats started using language to misrepresent what they actually meant, a kind of Orwellian misdirection of meaning in order to achieve an alternate goal, a kind of “War is Peace” scenario only their themes always pitted Left against Right. We call it being politically correct today.

What that is, is using language to change the way we perceive the reality around us. The most immediate example of this is how we used to refer to those who entered our country by crossing the border illegally, as Illegal Aliens.

In order for you and I to be more accepting of this illegality Liberals have change the way we refer to Illegal Aliens and only refer to them as migrants.

Therein lays the danger in corrupting language, the illegality continues but it is hidden from the mind because the word migrant elevates someone who breaks our immigration laws to the same category as those who come through Ellis Island legally.

All the while, the impact is 20 million additional people in this country that are here to benefit themselves by using the scarce resources of this country, but have no particular allegiance to this country’s interest.

This brings me to my point. Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama are speaking about the same word, change. And though there is a common denotation for the word change there are different connotations. (see story)

Listening to Sen. McCain make his case for the presidency last night it was clear that this patriot wishes to change the partisanship, rancor and impasse that 16 or more years of ultra partisan politics have produced in Washington D.C.

But in contrast, listening to Sen. Obama last week it is unmistakable that the change that he is advocating for is based in Party politics. Sen. Obama change is the completion of the job started in 2006, first Congress and now the White house. The change that Democrats want is Republicans out of office and an end to Conservatism.

Sen. McCain is on the right side of the message of change, the correct side, there is no doubt about it to fair minded people. Yet almost 8 years and hundreds of millions of dollars have produced an alternate reality it this country where we can no longer agree on the meaning of what is right and what is wrong.

And when that happens that is like having AIDS. This country has politic AIDS we lack the ability to distinguish what is actually good, beneficial and preservative to our nation that is the reason that a Barack Obama can even be compared to a John McCain.

When I hear these two men speak it is clear that though they are speaking about the same country,they are, in fact, speaking about two very different places.

Sen. Obama speaks about an America that never was and never will be because Obama’s America is a fairy tale. Sen. McCain speaks about traditions that have made this country great. Traditions that he knows about because he’s lived them.

Sen. Obama is backed by those who hate this country and would change it into something else.

Sen. McCain is backed by a tradition that has laid down its life for this country as it is and would only change the things that seek to destroy America.

So it all comes down to change.

OUCH!!!!!!

As much as the Obama campaign, and liberals in general,
would have you believe that they are not concerned by
the McCain/Palin ticket, the facts prove otherwise.

Sarah Palin’s speech last night has scared them to the point
of “impacting their alimentary canals”! (For a more polite
way of saying what I actually mean).

Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid, when asked about her
speech, had a one-word comment. “Shrill”! Now when
was the last time that Reid was speechless?

As for the official comments from the Obama campaign,
they claimed that Mrs.Palin was “mocking” Senator
Obama’s “community organizer” accomplishments. Pardon
me, but wasn’t it the Obama campaign that was mocking
Sarah Palin’s “small town Mayorship”?

Watch it libs..........what goes around, comes around!

Some Cud to Chew on!

Tom Winter, Editor-in-Chief of Human Events, praises
the all-revealing new book by crack investigative
reporter David Freddoso........

The Case Against Barack Obama...The Unlikely Rise and
Unexamined Agenda of the Media's Favorite Candidate.

This book is jam-packed with facts that the liberal
media have done their best to suppress, in their
unrelenting efforts to get the ultra-liberal senator
elected to the highest office in the land.

Here are some of the points he discovered............

The corrupt Chicago Machine politician who "made a
U.S. senator" out of Barack Obama -- and how he did it.

Payback: How Obama intervened to keep the Chicago
Machine in power while he was a U.S. senator.

How he won his first election by having his lawyers
knock his opponents off the ballot on technicalities.

His vocal support for a grotesque "infanticide bill"
that was too extreme even for Nancy Pelosi.

How his wife's salary tripled the year he became a
senator and started earmarking funds to her employer.

How Obama has repeatedly steered legislation to pay
off campaign donors.

"I've never done any favors for him," says Obama about
convicted developer Tony Rezko. Oh, but he has...

An eye-opener for the led blindly Obama backers......
and plenty of ammunition for the Republicans come November.

PALIN

Republican Vice President Nominee Sarah Palin

Before I became governor of the great state of Alaska, I was mayor of my hometown.

And since our opponents in this presidential election seem to look down on that experience, let me explain to them what the job involves.

I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a "community organizer," except that you have actual responsibilities.

I might add that in small towns, we don't quite know what to make of a candidate who lavishes praise on working people when they are listening, and then talks about how bitterly they cling to their religion and guns when those people aren't listening.

We tend to prefer candidates who don't talk about us one way in Scranton and another way in San Francisco. -- Sarah Palin, Republican Vice President Nominee

Who is Sarah Palin? She is the woman that Sen. Hillary Clinton was pretending to be and she is the Presidential candidate that Barack Obama wishes he was.

She has all of the experience, all of the charisma, and all of the genuineness that completely eclipses the Democrat Presidential ticket. (transcript of Palin’s speech)

Goodbye pantsuits we much prefer skirts and dresses and women who are woman enough to wear them.

If there were any thoughts that Conservatism is on the wane please relieve yourself of them because Sarah Palin is the future of Conservatism and boy the future is looking bright!

From her opening acceptance of the Republican nomination to be Vice President Gov. Palin set the tone to let it be known that she is a gifted orator and consummate politician. Gov. Palin’s acceptance speech was a rollout of personal introduction, family, political accomplishments, political philosophy, support for John McCain and justification of Republican and Conservative ideas. Oh yeah and Barack Obama push backs!

Gov. Palin’s career is demonstrative of the fact that she can bring home the bacon and fry it up in a pan and never, never have to attempt to act like a man.

Sen. McCain choice of this rising star is a tribute to his judgment and all but assures that he will be the 44th President of these United States of America.

Republican Vice President nominee Sarah Palin endeared herself to the GOP last night and put Washington on notice that a McCain-Palin administration will shake up the business as usual Washington insiders and bring the change that we all have been waiting for. And as well McCain-Palin will defend America from America’s enemies both foreign and domestic.

Sarah Palin you do us all proud! Now let’s work to get this historic Presidential team elected to serve in November! Sorry Sen. Obama you just don’t measure up to a Sarah Palin.

Obama: I’m better qualified than Governor Palin

Reporter Anderson Cooper and Sen. Barack Obama

“My understanding is that Gov. Palin’s town, Wassilla, has I think 50 employees. We've got 2500 in this campaign. I think their budget is maybe 12 million dollars a year – we have a budget of about three times that just for the month,”—Sen. Barack Obama

Does filling out a job application qualify one for a job that one is applying for? To Democrat hopeful Barack Obama it does.

In yet another ridiculous statement that is supported by most Democrats,(why else would they select him for their candidate?) Sen. Obama compared himself to the bottom of the Republican ticket. That’s right apparently Obama feels that Sen. McCain is too above his pay grade so Obama is comparing himself with vice President presumptive nominee Sarah Palin. (see story) (and here)

According to CNN Political Ticker’s Ed Hornick in an interview on CNN's Anderson Cooper 360 Monday night, Obama was asked about whether his experience in the U.S. Senate dealing with weather-related situations compares to Palin’s executive experience running the state of Alaska and as the small town mayor of Wasilla, Alaska.

“My understanding is that Gov. Palin’s town, Wassilla, has I think 50 employees. We've got 2500 in this campaign. I think their budget is maybe 12 million dollars a year – we have a budget of about three times that just for the month,” Obama responded.

Oops, will someone please alert Sen. Obama that he is only referring to Gov. Palin's experience as Mayor of Wasilla (though that experience is even more than Obama’s) but as we all know Gov. Palin has been Governor of Alaska for 2 two years that's 583 more working days than Obama's 143 working days in a 4 year Senate term of which he spent the larger portion of the tax payer's paid time campaigning for President.

The people of Illinois have been cheated out of the representation that they elected Senator Obama for by this stone stepping politician. It’s not fair but just another small inconvenience truth to borrow from another famous Democratic partisan. But that’s nothing compared to what the American people will be cheated out of if Obama is elected President.

Look, people are beginning to notice that Senator Obama’s résumé is equal to : I served part-time in the Illinois senate where I voted present the majority of the time to avoid creating a voting record and was elected Senator and served 143 working days in the Senate of a 4 year term. I did this all so that I could use these positions to elevate myself to run for the office of President of the United States of America as I said I would way back in Kindergarten. (Stone stepping!)

As for Governor Palin’s résumé it is chock full of actual accomplishments, Senator Obama is finding that he has to justify being first on a ticket that he is clearly not experienced enough to be first on.

Democrats should have listened to Sen. Clinton’s assessment when she told Gov. Richardson of New Mexico during the Democratic primaries that Sen. Obama wasn’t ready and that he can’t win.

This sad sorted tale of self-delusion and self deceit is a culmination of years of Democrats attempting to deceive the American people. Howard Dean, John Murtha, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Charles Schumer, Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton, Al Gore John Kerry and Barack Obama all deceivers, all deluded and all attempting to gain power for Party's sake.

The truth is Sen. Obama is not better qualified than the bottom of the Republican ticket and the truth also is, everyone else is beginning to realize that too!



In the follow 9 min. video listen how CNN’s Anderson Cooper and Sen. Obama pretend that Sen. Obama is President Obama. Watch as presumptive President Obama takes credit for legislation that Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal signed into law.

Jindal signed a $1 billion wetland restoration project into law on August 13th.

Finally Cooper sets Obama up with the question of his experience over Gov. Palin’s experience and Senator Obama pretends that Alaska’s FY2008 operating budget is not $11.2 billion, and the state of Alaska doesn’t employs approximately 15,000 people and that Alaska is not this country's 7th largest economy. Obama pretends that Gov. Palin is still a small town mayor. Incidentally if she were she'd still have more executive experience than Sen. Obama!



Senator Obama the United States doesn’t have 57 states and one to go, and you are not qualified to be President of the United States. And talking down Gov. Sarah Palin wouldn't make you better experienced than she!

Hey “Daily Kos”, Publish This!

I laughed so hard I actually slid off my recliner.

This morning, I saw the Fox & Friends program on
Fox News of course, and had the laugh of my life.

While the Democratic Convention was going on in
Denver, the premier news program sent a junior
reporter into the ongoing demonstrations. His job
was to interview several demonstrators, in order to
get some answers to very profound questions, including
what are you protesting with this demonstration?

He was armed with photos of various political
personalities, from both political parties. His
approach was casual and on a “college-age level”, to
be more in sync with the demonstrators. It was totally
amazing that not one of those “interviewed” knew any of the
individuals in the photos presented. Demonstrators
who casually throw “Dick Cheney” around in their
far-left conversations, had no idea who he was. Not
only couldn’t they say who he was, but what he did!
Going through the “gallery”, the reporter got the same
exact reaction from every interviewee. Not a clue!!!!

Fast forward to the Twin Cities. New reporter, new
demonstrators. Same result!!!!

The highlight of the series was the final photo shown
to them. It was Senator Joe Biden.......... Democratic
candidate for the vice presidency. The responses ranged
from “don’t know him” to “is he on TV?” They too,
didn’t have a clue.

Then the coup de grace......... “Why are you demonstrating,
what are you against?” And the response..........
“I can’t remember.............???????

This is the mentality of the “millions of new voters” that
the Democrats have been bragging about registering?

God please help this country!

McCain strikes Alaskan Gold with Palin pick

Senator John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska
Americans could not have asked Sen. McCain for a better pick to be his Presidential running mate than Gov. Sarah Palin. (see story)

While Obama's selection of Biden further marks Obama's inexperience, because Biden was selected to make up for the foreign policy experience that Obama doesn’t have, McCain's choice of Palin shows the wisdom of experience and political know-how.

Obama's choices will always be limited by his inexperience whereas McCain's experience will always show an unlimited ability to do the unexpected for the good of the country.

Democrats nominated Sen. Barack Obama a 3 year street organizer and a 7 year part-time Illinois state senator and college lecturer who has served only 143 actual days of a 4 year U.S. Senate term, now if any of us would have actually reported to work 143 days in four years we would have been fired.

Yet the rest of Sen. Obama’s time in the U.S. Senate at tax payer’s expense has been used to run for President. In comparison Gov. Palin has run two businesses and has the executive experience that neither Sens. Obama, Biden, Clinton nor McCain has.

Gov. Palin was elected governor of Alaska in 2006 before that she served 7 years as mayor of Wasilla, Alaska. Gov. Palin served 7 years on the Wasilla City Council.

Gov. Palin was a television sports reporter for 2 years and co-owned a commercial fishing operation for 20 years and owned a sport vehicle rental business for 4 years.

Gov. Palin was also chairwoman of Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission for 2 years. Gov. Palin has actual accomplishments compared to Sen. Obama’s résumé padding.

The fact is the GOP’s bottom of the ticket is more qualified to than the top and bottom of the Democrat ticket combined. Gov. Palin is more qualified than Sen. Obama to be President right now today! (see résumés)




Barack Obama is not ready to be President as stated by every Democrat that opposed him in the Democratic primaries and the fact that Democrats would have this man as their nominee is a travesty to the Office of President of the United States. However is it typical of a Party that for the last 8 years has been attempting to undermine the duly elected administration of President George W. Bush.

Creating Orwellian Worldview salutes Sen. McCain and his pick for Vice President running mate Gov. Sarah Palin.

The comparison between the McCain ticket and the Obama ticket is the difference between grown ups and children, it is the difference between experience and inexperience, and it is the difference between McCain the man and Obama the boy.

It is the difference between honorably serving this country as Sen. McCain has done all his adult life or for the first time as an adult being proud of your country ala Michelle Obama. Obama is simply not ready to lead. (see video)

Problems for Sarah???

Well, since the news broke that Sarah Palin's seventeen
year old daughter is five months pregnant, the far-left
garbage machines are already in full swing. They are
churning out their best vintage swill, in an attempt to
denegrate the Republican Vice-Presidential choice.

What total idiots!!!.......... no, sorry, I take that back.
That would be an insult to clinical idiots.

They fail to look at the moral side of this situation.
Palin's daughter, echoing her mother's own courage and love,
will keep the child, and the father of the child will marry
her. Though we all have our personal feelings about the
situation, I applaud the actions of all concerned, and their
belief that we take responsibility for our deeds.

Of course, this goes totally against the liberal point of
view. A far-left liberal wouldn't hesitate for a moment
to abort the child, blame the school system for failure to
supply proper birth control education or methods, and
probably seek financial remuneration from anybody who might
be within earshot! Whatever happened to responsibility for
our own actions?

What might conceivibly have been a potential problem for
the already embattled Governor, this displays not only the
moral fibre of the entire Palin family, but the true
Republican philosophy of independence and self reliance.

Obama’s Acceptance Speech was Old Wine Skins

Democrat Presidential Nominee Sen. Barack Obama

"And no one puts new wine into old wineskins ; otherwise the new wine will burst the skins and it will be spilled out, and the skins will be ruined.”—Luke 5:37 NAS

No one apparently except Barack Obama that is. Predictable, totally and fully predictable, Barack Obama’s acceptance speech could have been written by a 5th grade Democrat and it probably was!

After eight years of seeing Democrat treasonous political subterfuge we know exactly what these puerile individuals are going to do even before they do it.

And Obama did not disappoint. Its like Democrats have this formula and every Democrat who opens his or her mouth will recant verbatim the Democrat liturgy and Obama was on point Thursday night.

First attack George Bush, Second talk down the economy, third attempt to link John McCain to George Bush and then talk down John McCain. Turn on the digital recorder every time every Democrat will use this broken record this monotonous droning of negativity against Republicans.

That’s a summary of Sen. Obama speech and you all know it. That’s all they got! Democrats have got to make America look bad in order to justify their existence, America must look bad so that the electorate will vote for a Democrat. Bush, McCain and the Republicans must be demonized in order that you will willingly accept the socialism and the counter American Presidential candidacy of Barack Obama that Democrats are offering.

Democrats are not offering anything new it’s the same old Liberalism that has failed worldwide. So much so that the world is attempting to shed the cradle to grave socialist policies that American Liberals now tout in their health care policies in contradiction to the World’s attempt to be more like America. How else would you explain the European Union? The European Union is Europe’s attempt to come together in the likeness the United States of America to compete against and ultimately defeat the United States economically.

Be that as it is, Obama acceptance speech was a lack luster compilation of his stump speeches in which he went around and talked down America, talked down George Bush, and launched new George Bush like attacks against John McCain, attacks that the American people grow weary of, attacks that are the same old Democrat political tactics in partisanship that have virtually broken down Washington D.C. Tactics that are old wine skins for a politician that has promised the new wine of change.

Americans are only now coming clear on who broke Washington that is why this Democrat lead Congress has a lowest approval rating than any other Congress in history. Democrats have systematically sowed the seeds of hate politics and have paved the road to America's destruction with anti-American rhetoric in their attempt to change and remake America into their own Democratic socialist image.

Democrats first sent Al Gore who represented a continuation of the obfuscated Clinton years but America rejected Al Gore. So if the Clinton years were so great why didn’t Gore win in a landslide?

Then Democrats sent John Kerry who represented anybody but Bush, any administration than the current administration. Kerry would be more European and Europe would love him but Americans rejected John Kerry. So if the Democrats approach to government and foreign policy was better than Bush then why did the American people reject John Kerry?

Now Democrats are offering Barack Obama who is supposed to represent new wine, a completely fresh new way of doing things, change, the ultimate savior of us all. But Obama is using the old wine skins of Democrat blame America first; he did that in his European tour talking down America in Germany.

Obama is using the Democrat old wine skin of demonizing and blaming George Bush for all things. That is why Obama could not say that the surge is working and credit Bush for mounting the surge in the face of scathing opposition from the Democrat Party, opposition that Obama was chief among.

Obama is using the old wine skin of Democrat partisan politics the us against them. Accusing they, the Republicans, of breaking Washington and then using the we, the Democrats, as the fixers of Washington ala Hillary Clinton. When in truth any fair minded person knows that Democrats have equal responsibility in what is wrong in America.

Democrat give President Bush authority to go to war in Iraq, Democrat voted to fund the war and Democrats have done everything that they can to sabotage America hoping that we would lose in Iraq so that they would win the White house. (see here)

This is the legacy on which Barack Obama stands, this is nothing new! Voting for Obama will not bring change or a break from Washington as usual politics. Obama is the very best or worst (depending on your point of view) of Democrat old style Liberalism.

Sen. Obama is Old wine skins there is nothing new about his politics as there was noting new in his acceptance speech. His speech was the same old promises that the Democrats made in 2006 remember they said if they were given the majority in Congress they would change the course of America and end the war. All broken promises!

Well they got the majority that they asked for did they change America? Did they even keep one of their promises? And Sen. Obama won't either because he can't. Why he's already reneging on his promise of immediate withdrawal from Iraq.

Old wine and old wineskins. Sorry but that's Barack Obama and that's what I heard in his acceptance of the Democrat's nomination for President of the United States of America big Democrat promises but no way and experience to deliver those promises.

You and Us!

I get a real sour feeling when I see the TV ads from Union Bank
of Switzerland. They are so magnanimous, kind, dependable
and interested in your welfare. They brag about their strength
of assets, when other banks are failing. Do a little research folks, before you buy into their line.

This is the bank that refused to pay Holocaust survivors and the
families of Holocaust victims, the gold that was rightfully theirs.
Gold stolen by the Nazis and placed in safety deposit boxes in the
Swiss banks. Gold from jewelry, artifacts and even teeth, pulled
from the mouths of the prisoners before execution.

This is the bank that would have you believe that they are committed
to the welfare of the public, when in fact, this is the bank that “spent nine years pursuing tiny debts of British officers interned in Switzerland for part of the 1939 - 1945 WWII”.

“According to documents released at the Public Record Office, the
Union Bank of Switzerland lent money to 140 British officers who
had escaped from POW camps in Italy and Germany, and reached
neutral territory, often starving and dressed in rags”.

“A letter sent by UBS to the (British) War Office in 1954 said that 28 of the officers had failed to repay debts, which ranged from £8 to £70 (£160 to £1,400 at today's values). Eventually, the debts were paid from the public purse, although at least one officer had paid his debt eight years earlier”.

The above quotes are from an August 15, 1998 article by Ben Fenton,
of the British Telegraph News.

Now, does anybody wonder why the Swiss have the reputation of being
such a “solid” country? When you have the wealth of the world in
your coffers, much of it ill-gotten and in secret accounts, and you share none of your own wealth, how can you not be the most financially secure country in the world?

Chuck Schumer, You're a Schmuck!

Of all the idiotic criticisms of John McCain's choice of Sarah Palin, Governor of Alaska, as his Vice Presidential running mate..... none makes less sense than NY Senator Chuck Schumer's.

He said in essence, that choosing her was ridiculous, in light of her total lack of experience. Duuhhhhhhh, Senator........ are we comparing apples to apples, or apples to bananas?

Sarah Palin has extensive experience, not only at the ground-roots level of government, but as Mayor of a small town and finally Governor of Alaska,.... a not so small state. Neither Obama nor Biden have ever been responsible for governing anything. Biden has basked in the glory of his long tenure on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Obama................ well, Obama gave a speech in 2002.

The liberals are treading on very dangerous ground when they start talking about experience and "lack of". I am sure that McCain knows at least as much as Biden about foreign relations, having taken many trips to Western Europe, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and the Far East. So, I believe that the Republican's candidate for the presidency is very well grounded in reality. Nobody can say that about the Democrats presidential candidate.

Face it............we have a lop-sided competition here. The republicans have an experienced presidential candidate and VP candidate with limited experience in world affairs. The democrats have a VP candidate, experience in world affairs, and a presidential candidate who was a "community organizer". Neither the democratic top of the ticket nor the bottom of the ticket has ever managed or run a government.........large or small. That cannot be said about the republican ticket.

Separately.......... I just wanted to take a small piece of that "schmuck" title that I gave to Schumer......... and pass it on to former President Carter. Your comment about John McCain bleeding his "prisoner status" is revolting, disgusting and so much in keeping with your level of mentality. You, the quintessential "do nothing" president, who's only talent was to count his peanut profits, should apologize immediately. I always said while you were President, that you denigrated the respect of the office. Little did I realize that since that time, your downward spiral would continue. You have truly hit bottom!!!

Democrats Vow to Take America Back

Outside DNCC around the perimeter of the Pepsi Center

Out of this turmoil there emerged a powerful body of left-wing opinion and activism that turned the old national consensus upside down.

Rejecting Henry Clay’s “my country - right or wrong,” the left substituted “my country - always wrong.” More extreme elements declared their country to be the most oppressive society in history - racist at home and imperialist abroad - while discovering sublime virtues in genocidal tyrants from Mao Tse-Tung to Pol Pot.

While this raging ideological virus infected in varying degree a wide range of American institutions - e.g. media, academia - its principal victim was the national Democratic Party.—William Maloney

After a night that began with the Democrat Party nominating Sens. Barack Obama and Joe Biden as their President and Vice President choices for the November general election the night culminated in Sen. Obama vowing that Democrats would take America back. (see related video)



Obama’s statement came in a surprise appearance at the National Democrat convention after speeches from former President Bill Clinton and Obama’s pick for Vice President Joe Biden.

Sens. Obama and Biden inside DNCC Pepsi Center

But where is this mystical magical time and place which Liberal Democrats who call themselves Progressives wish to take America back to?

In his The Europeanization of the Democrat Party William Maloney brilliantly and succinctly diagnoses the Democrat Party’s threat to take America back. (see story)

Maloney recants that, [In less than a decade the party that boldly sponsored the Berlin airlift, the Marshall Plan, and the NATO alliance went from the confident activism of the hawkish John Kennedy - “pay any price, bear any burden to assure the success of liberty” - to the “Blame America First” defeatism of George McGovern - who aptly themed his 1972 acceptance speech as “Come Home, America.”

Betraying allies in Vietnam, ignoring genocide in Cambodia, accepting communist aggression from Angola to Afghanistan, and bowing to humiliation in Iran, America’s defense of liberty abroad was reduced to Carter’s pathetic gesture of boycotting the Moscow Olympics.

The sorry Democratic mismanagement of both economic and foreign policy led to a series of landslide Republican presidential victories and finally a decade of GOP congressional dominance. Yet, amazingly, none of these severe reality checks halted the Democrats' steady leftward drift.]

Maloney reminds America that there is no rosy Democrat future for America based on a time in the past where Democrats produced an American Narvanic experience.

There is only the prospect of America hating Liberals attempting to remake America into a nightmare of a dream. Not a Martin Luther King dream of living in Christian harmony but the nightmare of forcing America into the failed socio-economic policies of Europe.

Policies that even now Europe is attempting to cast off. This is where Democrat Liberals would take America back to if Democrats were elected in greater numbers in Congress and if Barack Obama were elected President. (see video)



America is not going back to a Democrat make believe fantasy, some Camelot that never existed not as long as the other half of the country joined by Independents have a say in this election.

2000 and 2004 failed to wake Democrats from their delusions about America and the American people but saying no to Barack Obama and the Democrat Party in 2008 sends a strong message that the American people will not taken in by the rhetoric and pretense of Democrat play acting.

The America people will not allow Democrats to “take America back” to never, never land, its time for Democrats to end the self delusion about Europe and come back to the American family!



It's time Democrats offer some real choices instead of false hope and false woman's rights advocates.

It's time Democrats quit talking down America it is time Democrats stop talking down the economy and it is time Democrats stop apologizing to Europe for America's protection of Europe and for America's rebuilding of Europe after World War II.

Most of all it time that Democrats stop seeking leadership under false pretenses, false change and false Messiahs.

The're Making the Bulls Larger Today!

It must be so.......... because I have never seen so
much "bullcrap" in one location. The Democratic
Convention is a mix of propaganda, celebrity, empty
promises and outright BS.

To listen to Obama, one would have to believe that all
his grand promises would be filled. Except for the
ones that are too difficult, cost too much, or not have
the backing of a Democratic Congress. What makes these
mindless sheep, who scream endlessly at the Convention,
think for one minute that Obama actually will be able
to change one thing in "old Washington", when he has
BECOME, "old Washington". Add to that, his poor
choice of Biden as his VP, and you HAVE "old Washington".

He speaks in generalities, of all the passions that all
Americans have. To want peace, prosperity, a comfortable
home, a reliable job, good schools, etc., etc. And he
claims that all of his unrealistic programs will be paid for
while giving tax cuts to some 250,000,000 people, allowing
small business the lower taxes necessary for them to grow.

Obama is going to examine the budget "line by line" and
eliminate wasteful and ineffective programs, in order to
free funds for his promises. Duuhhhhhhhhh, isn't that what
President Bush has done for the past eight years? BUT,
when he did that, the cries from the left side of the aisle
in Congress were deafening. I guess that Congress will just
give Obama a larger shovel!

The few good ideas that he "proposed" were stolen directly
from his oponent, John McCain, who was the first to advocate
offshore and Anwar drilling, more nuclear power plants, and clean
coal technology, while we develop the alternate energy sources.
Up until tonight, I thought Obama was still against those plans,
and wanted us all to check our tire pressure, and save as much
oil as offshore drilling would produce. He is truly the epitome
of the Washington politician!!!!!

This man is definitely a "rock star celebrity". All fluff
and fanfare, and absolutely no substance. And the Democrats
have done a fantastic job of creating a silk purse out of a
sow's ear. An eloquent ear I grant, but one filled with
empty rhetoric.

He promises a "turning point" in American History. Maybe so,
but none of us want that direction to be down!!!!!